| 02:46.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-home (n=tilghman@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 02:46.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-home] by ChanServ |
| 02:47.46 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (n=tilghman@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 02:47.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 03:08.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ZX81 (n=matt@202.20.97.211) |
| 03:16.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=Fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 03:50.43 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs h0 (n=Fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 04:06.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-home (i=four@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 04:06.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-home] by ChanServ |
| 04:07.58 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=white@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 04:07.58 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 08:59.26 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs aiksa[LV] (n=aiks@mx.fiveplus.lv) |
| 08:59.46 | aiksa[LV] | Hi everyone. ASnyone active here? |
| 09:00.15 | aiksa[LV] | Just wanted to know whether I should submit a bug to the tracker, or if I am experiencing know issue |
| 09:01.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-home (i=indigo@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 09:01.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-home] by ChanServ |
| 09:03.05 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=orange@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 09:03.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 09:03.28 | aiksa[LV] | oh well, I guess it sleep time for the asterisk developers :) |
| 13:22.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=Fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 13:29.48 | De_Mon | aiksa[LV] if you had actually explained what you were experiencing, someone could have replied by now. |
| 13:30.04 | De_Mon | at any rate, to find out if its a known issue all you gotta do is look on the bug tracker! |
| 13:38.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguerom@h-68-167-124-171.cmbrmaor.covad.net) |
| 13:41.30 | mvanbaak | ~question |
| 13:41.30 | infobot | [question] If you have a question and want people to give useful answers, make sure you have read this first: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
| 13:41.48 | mvanbaak | ~ask |
| 13:41.48 | infobot | Questions in the channel should be specific, informative, complete, concise, and on-topic. Don't ask if you can ask a question first. Don't ask if a person is there, just ask what you intended to ask them. Better questions more frequently yield better answers. We are all here voluntarily or against our will. |
| 13:43.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (i=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-2204ec29780e4615) |
| 13:43.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:17.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
| 14:17.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 14:32.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=Fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 14:44.00 | russellb | btw ... I tweaked svnbot yesterday |
| 14:44.10 | russellb | it now notes what files were changed in the commit |
| 14:44.15 | russellb | which also shows which branch it came from |
| 15:14.40 | Juggie | sweet |
| 15:14.53 | Juggie | how was the flight back russell? |
| 15:14.55 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-lap (i=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 15:14.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 15:15.26 | Juggie | Corydon76: ping |
| 15:15.29 | russellb | it was alright ... |
| 15:15.36 | Juggie | mine sucked |
| 15:15.56 | Juggie | on the 4hrs from phoenix -> detroit i had some big guy next to me who kept invading my personal space... |
| 15:16.10 | Juggie | like his elbow half way into my seat, and same with his legs hah |
| 15:16.32 | Juggie | it was rather uncomfortable as i was trying to be as small as i could to not take up any room and sleep, and the more room i gave him, the more he took |
| 15:16.40 | Juggie | i'll never ever fly NWA again, what a joke. |
| 15:16.46 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs michael-i (n=michael-@Ldf84.l.pppool.de) |
| 15:16.50 | Corydon76-lap | pong |
| 15:17.17 | Juggie | Corydon76 without being able to give me a definitate answer, can you elaborate a little more on the confusion about the moz license. |
| 15:17.50 | Juggie | re if someoen releases a lib under that license. |
| 15:17.50 | Corydon76-lap | Ask a lawyer |
| 15:18.10 | Juggie | i have no idea where i'd find a lawyer who knew anything about open source licenses :) |
| 15:18.41 | Juggie | i guess i can just email sales@digium and let them deal with it. |
| 15:18.55 | Corydon76-lap | Quite simply, it's too unclear an area for me to give you any better clue about it |
| 15:19.11 | Corydon76-lap | sales won't know anything about it |
| 15:19.51 | Juggie | ah i see... i was toying with the idea of paying digium to implement something in *, as i have before.. but the library thats avail, unless they were to write their own, is under moz 1.1. |
| 15:20.04 | Corydon76-lap | In fact, I'd say it's gray enough that the library owner will need to file a disclaimer for that to work |
| 15:20.25 | Corydon76-lap | That would be the legally cautious way to go |
| 15:20.30 | Juggie | that may not be a huge problem given who it is.. |
| 15:21.53 | Juggie | see pm for details if your curious. |
| 15:22.47 | Juggie | i just assume that if sales/contracting were to entertain the offer, they would have to check into the legality of it. |
| 15:23.08 | Juggie | which is why it would not really be my problem. |
| 15:41.32 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@000-222-951.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 15:41.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 15:42.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ted_brown (n=angel@212.145.176.154) |
| 16:26.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=Fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 16:53.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ted_brown (n=angel@212.145.176.154) |
| 16:53.42 | ted_brown | hi |
| 16:53.42 | ted_brown | i need to reopen a closed bug |
| 16:53.47 | ted_brown | and i don't know how |
| 16:54.24 | ted_brown | will i open a new one? |
| 16:56.15 | file | what bug? |
| 16:56.33 | ted_brown | 10406 |
| 16:56.56 | file | done |
| 16:57.13 | ted_brown | thanks |
| 16:58.12 | Corydon76-lap | What about 10406? |
| 17:00.25 | ted_brown | i've had another deadlock |
| 17:00.52 | Corydon76-lap | Got a new 'core show locks' for me? |
| 17:01.18 | ted_brown | yes, it's already uploaded |
| 17:03.24 | Corydon76-lap | Well, it's not the same deadlock, anyway |
| 17:04.29 | ted_brown | it looks quite similar |
| 17:07.24 | Corydon76-lap | I'll have to get out paper and pencil again |
| 17:08.52 | ted_brown | if you need more info, i haven't still killed the process |
| 17:11.42 | ted_brown | one question |
| 17:11.49 | Corydon76-lap | k |
| 17:12.02 | ted_brown | why are there so many iax threads if we are not using iax? |
| 17:13.41 | ted_brown | jaja |
| 17:13.51 | ted_brown | :) |
| 17:16.00 | Corydon76-lap | ted_brown, there doesn't appear to be a deadlock at all |
| 17:16.48 | ted_brown | well, the pri lines are down |
| 17:17.00 | ted_brown | but there are calls from them stuck in queues |
| 17:17.09 | Corydon76-lap | Hmmm |
| 17:17.32 | ted_brown | and we couldn't make sip calls |
| 17:19.25 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ecarrera (n=IceChat7@160.Red-80-26-93.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 17:20.40 | Corydon76-lap | russellb, ping |
| 17:23.23 | ted_brown | if you don't think it's a deadlock |
| 17:23.32 | ted_brown | what else can it be? |
| 17:23.39 | ted_brown | need any test? |
| 17:23.54 | Corydon76-lap | I need to study this a bit |
| 17:24.28 | Corydon76-lap | I initially missed that something was locked twice |
| 17:25.31 | Corydon76-lap | So yes, deadlock, different one, I'm going to need some time to come up with a fix for it, though |
| 17:25.38 | ted_brown | ok |
| 17:25.50 | ted_brown | i'll go home then |
| 17:25.54 | ted_brown | many hours here |
| 17:26.05 | ted_brown | thank you |
| 17:26.19 | Corydon76-lap | Don't thank me, yet, I haven't fixed it |
| 17:26.31 | ted_brown | i trust you :) |
| 18:09.37 | russellb | Corydon76-lap: pong |
| 18:10.04 | file | russellb: you have a meeeeeting |
| 18:10.11 | russellb | lol |
| 18:10.14 | russellb | D'OH |
| 18:10.19 | file | late :( |
| 18:14.16 | mvanbaak | lol |
| 18:15.14 | file | mvanbaak: did my double CTCP reply confuse you? |
| 18:16.23 | mvanbaak | yup |
| 18:16.33 | file | do a CTCP version |
| 18:16.44 | mvanbaak | wtf ? |
| 18:16.45 | file | that'll confuse you even more! :D |
| 18:16.57 | mvanbaak | hahahahaha |
| 18:16.59 | mvanbaak | nice one |
| 18:16.59 | file | IRC proxy |
| 18:17.03 | mvanbaak | yeah |
| 18:17.10 | mvanbaak | my wife asked me what time it was there |
| 18:20.35 | mvanbaak | it looks like one of the latest commits fixed my reload crash |
| 18:23.16 | Juggie | hax0r |
| 18:23.23 | Juggie | pc & laptop i guess :) |
| 18:23.30 | file | yup |
| 18:23.53 | Juggie | it is (or it was) speed stepped down to 800mhz |
| 18:24.05 | file | it is |
| 18:24.17 | Juggie | you really should yell @ someone over your battery life |
| 18:24.21 | Juggie | get some new batteries |
| 19:29.22 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:29.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:30.36 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:38.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:39.35 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:40.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 20:13.44 | Juggie | russellb: ping? |
| 20:13.52 | russellb | pong |
| 20:14.25 | Juggie | just curious on that agi fix, in what situation would we have a EINTR or a EAGAIN but still somehow get \n? |
| 20:15.31 | russellb | you'll have to ask bmd |
| 20:15.35 | russellb | but it broke fastagi for him |
| 20:15.54 | russellb | it was giving him EAGAIN after a full read for some reason |
| 20:15.58 | Juggie | the reason i didnt put \n in there is someone could do VERBOSE blah\nVERBOSE mooo |
| 20:15.59 | russellb | so it just looped ... |
| 20:16.03 | Juggie | and stack two commands together |
| 20:16.14 | russellb | but fgets() should break on \n |
| 20:16.23 | russellb | because that's what fgets does |
| 20:16.27 | Juggie | ya, it *should* |
| 20:16.49 | Juggie | in theory, there is an error on his pipe, but still somehow getting the full string |
| 20:45.28 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs d1mas (n=chatzill@ip195.117.adsl.wplus.ru) |
| 20:46.15 | d1mas | hello. Couple of days ago I emailed asterisk-dev list proposing to remove splitting values by semicolon on res+conf_odbc |
| 20:46.42 | Corydon76-lap | Don't think that's going to happen |
| 20:46.50 | d1mas | why? |
| 20:47.19 | Corydon76-lap | I think we discussed what SHOULD happen, which you didn't address in your email. |
| 20:47.32 | Corydon76-lap | Come up with a method for escaping it |
| 20:49.24 | Corydon76-lap | Database is supposed to be a way to encapsulate what is already supported in flat files. We don't change the flat files to make the expression of the database easier |
| 20:49.32 | d1mas | what does it mean? placing ~; instead of semicolon? not gonna work because fullcontact column is written by the Asterisk itself it is not some kind of external data. Or are suggesting me to mdify code whuch reads/writes fullcontact too ? |
| 20:50.16 | Corydon76-lap | I am suggesting that your current approach isn't going to work |
| 20:50.25 | d1mas | what changes in flat files I insist ??? |
| 20:51.01 | Corydon76-lap | You asked to make various fields parseable by commas at the module level, rather than letting the config parser take care of it |
| 20:51.02 | d1mas | and that is something I do not understand completely. My approach is 100% compatible to what users already have in files/DB. why it isnt going to work? |
| 20:51.44 | Corydon76-lap | But it's not 100% compatible with what users already have in the DB |
| 20:51.44 | d1mas | it is |
| 20:52.22 | Corydon76-lap | Show me a patch and I'll show you it not working |
| 20:55.08 | d1mas | build_peer (or anything else reading the config) will just split "allow" parameter by coma and semicolon. (Ok, it can be pure semicolon if you insist. To me coma just looks better). So if user has allow=a;b;c, the odbc_conf will read is exactly as name=allow, value=a;b;c and then build_peer will split it. When user uses plaintext file, he will just specify allow multiple times as he... |
| 20:55.10 | d1mas | ...currently does so the piece of code parsin "allow" will be executed several times - once on each line. And since this piece of code _adds_ to allow list not replacing everything, it will work too. |
| 20:57.29 | Corydon76-lap | Yes, but you're ignoring that a semicolon is a comment in flat files |
| 20:57.51 | Corydon76-lap | That is EXACTLY why it was chosen as the delimiter in the DB |
| 20:58.55 | Corydon76-lap | Indeed, to use a semicolon in an option, you MUST escape it in the flat file |
| 20:59.06 | Corydon76-lap | Hence, escaping it for a DB isn't that far fetched |
| 20:59.15 | d1mas | hm... Sorry, how do I ignore that fact? plaintext file parser handles that - it just does not return rest of the line past semicolon, so I getting "pure value" |
| 21:00.14 | d1mas | Okay which means semicolon can not be used in plaintext file to list values. But user still can put several lines of "allow" exactly as he does now. |
| 21:00.26 | Corydon76-lap | Why don't you just escape the semicolon in the DB? |
| 21:00.37 | Corydon76-lap | It's just one field that you're trying to make this work for |
| 21:00.41 | d1mas | I can not. It is put by Asterisk itself not by me |
| 21:01.03 | Corydon76-lap | Then fix it in Asterisk for this one field |
| 21:01.26 | d1mas | Okay, I'm trying to do that because I really consider it is a bug that every field gets split at the level which has no idea what contant of that field is |
| 21:01.45 | Corydon76-lap | Hence why I suggested escaping |
| 21:02.25 | Corydon76-lap | It is not a bug. It is intentional behavior |
| 21:02.40 | d1mas | oh, you can call it feature of course :) |
| 21:02.55 | Corydon76-lap | No, it's just the way it was designed to work |
| 21:03.23 | Corydon76-lap | You could call it a shortcoming in the design, but it is NOT a bug. |
| 21:05.49 | d1mas | ok, I see you do not like my approach, but can you at least admit it IS fully compatible to existing DB/files? :) |
| 21:06.06 | Corydon76-lap | It is NOT fully compatible |
| 21:06.23 | d1mas | ok, can you give quick example where it fails? |
| 21:07.19 | Corydon76-lap | You'd have to patch anything that even remotely calls ast_config_load or ast_config_realtime to achieve compatibility |
| 21:07.55 | Corydon76-lap | and that's an architectural change that I'm unwilling to stand behind |
| 21:09.53 | d1mas | Okay, it is a bit unfair saying this gona introduce incompatibility because if I properly patch everything I will close this incompatibility myself. My words what in case it is properly patched, it works with 100% of existing files etc. But ok, I understand your position. (Although I do not like it) :) |
| 21:14.15 | d1mas | just curious if you allow semicolon in user passwords... |
| 21:15.20 | Corydon76-lap | Nope |
| 21:17.59 | d1mas | well, for IAX build_user do the concatenation of "parts" while build_peer does not. Looks like someone tried to solve problem with semicolon in non-list field for himself... |
| 21:21.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs kpfleming (i=kpflemin@nat/digium/x-86ed9096fc2683e9) |
| 21:21.54 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 21:28.09 | d1mas | corydon76, so is the patch deemed to be rejected or you could change your mind after looking at it? |
| 21:31.29 | Corydon76-lap | I reserve the right to change my mind at any time. In fact, I reserve the right to change my mind yesterday. |
| 21:33.34 | Corydon76-lap | violations of the space-time continuum notwithstanding |
| 21:36.17 | Deeewayne | Its been 417 days, but 7706 is now officially closed. Yay! |
| 21:36.56 | Corydon76-lap | Yay! |
| 21:37.25 | Corydon76-lap | It was a rather tough one, though |
| 21:37.50 | Corydon76-lap | probably was worth waiting until Russell wrote 'core show locks' |
| 21:38.05 | Deeewayne | Corydon76-lap: thanks for all your help, you saved me hours of debugging |
| 21:38.23 | russellb | <3 |
| 21:38.33 | Corydon76-lap | Heh, yw... nice that I happened to be working in the same spot, too |
| 21:39.09 | Corydon76-lap | russellb, 10406 got two uses of 'core show locks' |
| 21:39.19 | russellb | Corydon76-lap: awesome |
| 21:39.20 | Corydon76-lap | Two different deadlocks, one masked the other |
| 21:39.41 | russellb | that sounds quite exciting |
| 21:39.55 | Corydon76-lap | Quite |
| 21:40.03 | russellb | and to introduce cluster-wide deadlocks, i'm working on adding support for distributed locks :-p |
| 21:40.49 | russellb | hehe |