| 01:18.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=silver@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 01:18.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 01:18.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguerom@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 02:30.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs IgorG (n=FeedomPa@195.162.32.126) |
| 02:31.22 | IgorG | Hello, anyone here? |
| 08:02.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=beige@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 08:02.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 08:02.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-home (i=gold@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 08:02.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-home] by ChanServ |
| 09:46.20 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@soll4-125.cust.blixtvik.net) |
| 10:57.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 11:59.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs blitzrage (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 11:59.12 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
| 13:27.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs zerohalo (n=zeroHalo@pool-72-70-79-233.bstnma.east.verizon.net) |
| 14:11.46 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs blitzrage (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 14:11.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
| 14:20.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@h460565e0.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 14:21.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 14:42.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (i=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-6788265e7022a3ca) |
| 14:42.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:45.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguerom@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 14:45.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs d1mas (n=chatzill@host-99.dataart.net) |
| 14:53.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs hi365 (n=hi365@mail.pcgeula.co.il) |
| 14:54.49 | hi365 | are there any know problems with queues in 1.14.11? my queues slowes dont the system to a crawl after about 12hr |
| 14:55.07 | hi365 | cpu load is low, as is memory usage :( can pinpoit the problem |
| 14:58.21 | putnopvut | hi365: I haven't heard those sort of complaints with queues. |
| 15:02.19 | putnopvut | heh |
| 15:04.25 | jmls | there's _nothing_ wrong with app_queue.c |
| 15:04.38 | jmls | ~lart putnopvut |
| 15:04.38 | infobot | strangles putnopvut with a 9-pole serial cable |
| 15:05.09 | putnopvut | Oh, there's plenty wrong with it. I just haven't heard of it eating up CPU like that. |
| 15:06.04 | d1mas | last time I updated to HEAD (it was yesterday), app_queue was crashing asterisk :) |
| 15:06.13 | jmls | well, why don't you put in the Queue(queue|^) option ^ flag:- "Eat All CPU flag" |
| 15:06.28 | jmls | then it behaves as expected ;) |
| 15:08.00 | putnopvut | d1mas: yeah, I saw that issue in the tracker. |
| 15:08.13 | putnopvut | I just pulled up app_queue to see what's causing the problem. |
| 15:10.32 | d1mas | well the issue is already closed :) but I see no commit which closes it... |
| 15:11.51 | jmls | d1mas: closed because a duplicate .. |
| 15:11.53 | jmls | M10987 |
| 15:11.54 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_queue 0010987: new app_queue crashes reported by andrew http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10987 |
| 15:13.09 | putnopvut | Right, and I believe I have found the error causing that crash. |
| 15:13.22 | putnopvut | I'm working out a patch right now and will upload it on 10987 when I have it finished. |
| 15:13.27 | d1mas | ahh. Ok then. I thought both were closed |
| 15:21.02 | putnopvut | Actually, I decided against uploading the patch since the problem was rather obvious. I just tested and the crash is gone. |
| 15:21.14 | putnopvut | Committed in revision 85852 |
| 15:21.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 15:21.43 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jcmoore (n=jcmoore@unaffiliated/tgrman) |
| 15:25.49 | d1mas | will ty later today |
| 15:25.52 | d1mas | try |
| 15:31.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fedealves (i=johndoe@97-243.187-72.tampabay.res.rr.com) |
| 15:32.19 | fedealves | hello gentlemen, has anybody looked at bug id 10973? it is still sitting there after I uploaded the traces. I would really appreciate some help. |
| 16:27.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs kpfleming (i=kpflemin@nat/digium/x-45eb5bf90ac65ade) |
| 16:27.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 16:41.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@h460565e0.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 16:41.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 16:48.41 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 17:06.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs matsk (n=mk@host-217-213-138-53.mobileonline.telia.com) |
| 18:16.45 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-lap (i=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 18:16.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 18:48.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-away (i=snuff@220-253-159-93.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
| 19:02.55 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 19:05.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 20:19.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak (i=michiel@vanbaak.xs4all.nl) |
| 21:03.48 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs zerohalo (n=zeroHalo@pool-72-70-79-233.bstnma.east.verizon.net) |
| 22:19.40 | putnopvut | I asked this yesterday and didn't get a response. Thought I'd ask again. |
| 22:19.53 | putnopvut | Hold on... |
| 22:20.04 | russellb | o.O |
| 22:20.06 | putnopvut | M10885 |
| 22:20.07 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_queue 0010885: Queue recording via monitor-format and monitor-join produces output different from MixMonitor reported by Alric http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10885 |
| 22:20.15 | putnopvut | (I was looking for the bug ID) |
| 22:20.45 | putnopvut | It appears as if monitor-join is broken, and since the same functionality can be achieved in queues using monitor-type=mixmonitor |
| 22:20.55 | putnopvut | I was wondering if we could just deprecate the monitor-join option. |
| 22:21.10 | putnopvut | (but fix it in 1.4 still) |
| 22:26.44 | russellb | sounds reasonable |
| 22:29.54 | putnopvut | russellb's approval (no matter how passionate it may be) is always a good sign. |
| 22:30.21 | russellb | heh |
| 22:31.08 | russellb | i think the astounding lack of opinion means, "sounds good, go ahead" |
| 22:31.38 | putnopvut | Yeah, I just always like to double-check on something like this in case someone has a really good reason for keeping it around. |
| 22:33.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ZX81 (n=matt@202.49.106.158) |
| 23:04.07 | russellb | putnopvut: UPGRADE.txt as well plzkthx |
| 23:13.03 | putnopvut | Yes, I'm writing that now. |
| 23:13.08 | russellb | k |
| 23:14.59 | Qwell | huh... if nothing is using a kernel module... does it still...do stuff? |
| 23:21.31 | russellb | that's a very generic question |
| 23:21.41 | Qwell | yeah |
| 23:21.45 | russellb | how about, potentially, yes |
| 23:21.59 | russellb | just like you can load an asterisk module that nothing actually "uses", but could be "doing stuff" |