| 01:01.31 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 01:54.57 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs dlynes (n=dlynes@d154-20-9-152.bchsia.telus.net) |
| 01:57.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (i=dwayne@nat/digium/x-1402dd23bfd73270) |
| 01:57.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 01:58.06 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs angler (i=angler@pdpc/sponsor/digium/angler) |
| 02:24.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs angler (i=angler@pdpc/sponsor/digium/angler) |
| 02:38.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Juggie (n=Juggie@CPE001601df17fb-CM001a6682d7b6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 02:38.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Juggie] by ChanServ |
| 02:40.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@65.88.2.5) |
| 02:40.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 05:03.30 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs dlynes_laptop (n=dlynes@d154-20-9-152.bchsia.telus.net) |
| 05:08.58 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs yoman_ (n=are@85-250-5-254.bb.netvision.net.il) |
| 08:26.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 09:57.26 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mbranca (n=matteo@host-210-mi.linuxserver.it) |
| 11:06.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:02.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fs-locaweb (i=FS-LocaW@200.234.206.130) |
| 12:03.20 | fs-locaweb | Situation: When I try to make an attended transfer and the Monitor application is activated for the call, the legs of audio loses sync at the recorded file. Does anybody know how to fix this issue? |
| 12:24.24 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs blitzrage (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 12:24.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
| 13:52.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (i=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-1cce6607037b1858) |
| 13:52.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:02.02 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs dlynes_laptop (n=dlynes@d154-20-9-152.bchsia.telus.net) |
| 14:09.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 14:24.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs dlynes_laptop (n=dlynes@d154-20-9-152.bchsia.telus.net) |
| 14:58.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jcmoore (n=jcmoore@unaffiliated/tgrman) |
| 15:02.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
| 15:02.48 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 15:49.14 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agallo (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 16:10.31 | blitzrage | M7787 |
| 16:10.32 | MuffinMan | [confirmed] [Asterisk] Core/General 0007787: [patch] DTMF Caller-ID support. reported by ehsnils http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7787 |
| 16:10.58 | blitzrage | Should those patches be marked as code? Do they require a license? |
| 16:11.46 | russellb | all patches should be marked |
| 16:11.51 | putnopvut | blitzrage: They should be marked as code. |
| 16:12.08 | blitzrage | done |
| 16:12.17 | blitzrage | ok -- we need a license on file to move this forward then |
| 16:13.41 | blitzrage | status updated to reflect that |
| 16:19.26 | blitzrage | let me just make sure I'm doing this right.... any code I find which has been in the bug tracker since before the new license agreement stuff was merged into the bug tracker, should be marked as code if it is code, and if the new license agreement has not been signed, then I should mark the bug Needs License? |
| 16:20.47 | blitzrage | Qwell: 8096 now has the suggestions you asked for implemented into the patch -- this might be mergable |
| 16:20.57 | blitzrage | I can test if you wish first |
| 16:23.34 | Qwell | to be honest, I'm not all that fond of it |
| 16:25.04 | Qwell | blitzrage: for stuff uploaded before the new license agreement, there is a magic button on the user management page |
| 16:25.15 | Qwell | submit predated license |
| 16:25.22 | Qwell | that's for people who previously had a disclaimer |
| 16:25.31 | blitzrage | gotcha -- I'll mark this one as such on this bug then |
| 16:27.18 | blitzrage | Qwell: I don't think I have access to that page.... |
| 16:27.24 | Qwell | oh |
| 16:27.26 | Qwell | what bug? |
| 16:27.38 | blitzrage | 7787 |
| 16:27.45 | blitzrage | (see link above) |
| 16:28.24 | blitzrage | as for 8096... is it the concept you don't like, or how it is implemented? Anything we can do to try and get that bug resolved? |
| 16:28.31 | Qwell | the concept |
| 16:28.43 | putnopvut | M8096 |
| 16:28.44 | MuffinMan | [feedback] [Asterisk] Core/General 0008096: [Patch] Add rollback Option to makefile reported by tristan_mahe http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8096 |
| 16:29.17 | blitzrage | so in these cases... what do we do? Say thanks for the patch, but we don't want it? :) |
| 16:29.32 | Qwell | blitzrage: fixed |
| 16:29.40 | blitzrage | thx! |
| 16:29.45 | Qwell | yeah, I don't know.. |
| 16:30.08 | blitzrage | status fixed... |
| 16:30.27 | blitzrage | does that mean it goes to a vote? :) |
| 16:30.43 | Qwell | well, let me explain why I don't like it |
| 16:30.46 | blitzrage | ok cool |
| 16:30.48 | blitzrage | that might help |
| 16:31.36 | Qwell | what happens in the case where a dir changes? what if somebody rolls back twice? What if you try to rollback in 1.6 and rollback-install in 1.8? |
| 16:32.11 | Qwell | easiest way to go about this is to just keep copies of the source around that you want to be able to reinstall |
| 16:32.29 | blitzrage | I tend to agree |
| 16:32.35 | blitzrage | this could cause more problems than its worth |
| 16:32.42 | Qwell | yep.. |
| 16:32.54 | blitzrage | plus just keeping the source seems easier to manage... |
| 16:32.58 | blitzrage | which is what I've done |
| 16:33.13 | Qwell | we do it on misery |
| 16:33.24 | Juggie | my asterisk dir has like 10 different source versions |
| 16:33.32 | blitzrage | ya, same here |
| 16:33.35 | blitzrage | if not more sometimes |
| 16:33.35 | putnopvut | Juggie: only 10? |
| 16:33.43 | blitzrage | he is only part time :) |
| 16:33.52 | putnopvut | Yeah, I'm just messing with him. |
| 16:33.52 | blitzrage | Qwell: do you want to put those comments into that bug and close it then? |
| 16:33.56 | Juggie | i did a fresh centos5 install when it came out :) |
| 16:34.27 | blitzrage | or you can put in the comments, and I'll agree and close it |
| 16:39.17 | Qwell | closed |
| 16:39.25 | blitzrage | thx! |
| 16:40.19 | blitzrage | hawt |
| 16:40.26 | blitzrage | can I have a platinum star? |
| 16:40.28 | Qwell | NO! |
| 16:40.35 | file | no, and just because you asked... |
| 16:41.07 | blitzrage | :) |
| 16:41.12 | file | stupid telemarketers... I don't want an alarm system |
| 16:41.21 | putnopvut | I want one for my office. |
| 16:41.22 | blitzrage | heh |
| 16:41.24 | blitzrage | sure you do! |
| 16:41.36 | Corydon76-dig | I want an anti-alarm system |
| 16:42.05 | Qwell | putnopvut: I was *really* close to asking yesterday if we had to set off the alarm if we wanted to go |
| 16:42.15 | blitzrage | :) |
| 16:42.42 | putnopvut | I never ever want to go to alarm school. |
| 16:43.06 | Corydon76-dig | only if the alarm school is on Monday |
| 16:43.10 | blitzrage | I'm really tempted to use some of my complex dialplan code to test trunk and see where it breaks.... |
| 16:43.15 | blitzrage | but I should probably write documentation :( |
| 16:43.29 | putnopvut | blitzrage: it'll break in several places probably. |
| 16:43.34 | blitzrage | I imagine so |
| 16:43.44 | putnopvut | But you know something, discovering bugs before a release is a good thing. |
| 16:43.46 | blitzrage | but that would be the point :) |
| 16:44.07 | Corydon76-dig | Qwell: I have to wonder if the ops people have a sense of humor |
| 16:44.56 | Corydon76-dig | Telling us that we'd have to pay for the damage if we didn't hang our white boards "properly" for one |
| 16:45.22 | file | whiteboard hanging is a valuable skill |
| 16:46.05 | blitzrage | I've never seen so many wasted cycles about white boards :) |
| 16:46.06 | file | blitzrage: do you not posess said skill? |
| 16:46.22 | blitzrage | file: I do possess said skill as I hung my own whiteboard in my room |
| 16:46.32 | blitzrage | however... I have an office now, and should really think about relocating it to said office |
| 16:46.34 | file | but did you hang it properly? |
| 16:46.37 | Corydon76-dig | blitzrage: which room is yours? |
| 16:46.53 | putnopvut | My whiteboard says "poop" on it. |
| 16:47.08 | Corydon76-dig | putnopvut: is it upside down? |
| 16:47.16 | putnopvut | Nope. |
| 16:47.26 | Corydon76-dig | I think it is. dood |
| 16:47.27 | putnopvut | Oh wait, I am though. |
| 16:47.29 | Qwell | mine only says "BLUE" ;/ |
| 16:47.36 | putnopvut | In red marker, too right? |
| 16:47.41 | blitzrage | Corydon76-dig: mine is the room beside my bedroom |
| 16:47.51 | Corydon76-dig | blitzrage: kinky |
| 16:48.08 | blitzrage | I don't see how... but cool :) |
| 17:41.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 17:53.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jlfs (i=jlfs@64-142-22-71.vpn.sonic.net) |
| 17:54.19 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jlfs (i=jlfs@64-142-22-71.vpn.sonic.net) |
| 18:04.30 | blitzrage | M11129 |
| 18:04.31 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_dial 0011129: Set CHANNELFORWARD variable to allow more control over setting CALLERID(num) on calls forwarded by 302 "Moved Temporarily" reported by eurodrew555 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11129 |
| 18:04.45 | blitzrage | can someone agree or disagree with me there? |
| 18:06.23 | putnopvut | Looking... |
| 18:06.24 | Qwell | sounds logical |
| 18:06.42 | blitzrage | ok, then I'm gonna close |
| 18:07.14 | file | blitzrage is turning into a proper bug marshal! |
| 18:07.19 | blitzrage | oh snap |
| 18:08.44 | putnopvut | What's the bug count down to? |
| 18:09.01 | file | 383 |
| 18:09.08 | putnopvut | Doing better... |
| 18:09.16 | blitzrage | 382! |
| 18:16.31 | Qwell | 381 |
| 18:19.13 | putnopvut | blitzrage: you rule |
| 18:19.23 | blitzrage | I'm just trying to find something to work on :) |
| 18:19.48 | blitzrage | I wish I could just code so i could actually be useful :) |
| 18:19.58 | file | come visit, I'll teach you to code! |
| 18:20.06 | blitzrage | file: that might not be a bad idea... |
| 18:20.12 | blitzrage | since I can actually fly to parts of Canada |
| 18:20.31 | blitzrage | file: or you could come here since I have a 2nd bed now and no room mate, and an office |
| 18:20.39 | file | also true |
| 18:20.47 | Qwell | OR you both could come here |
| 18:20.57 | file | ha |
| 18:21.11 | blitzrage | actually... that's not true |
| 18:21.23 | blitzrage | I can't go to the office without a VISA |
| 18:21.27 | blitzrage | I've been flagged! |
| 18:21.30 | Qwell | flagged? |
| 18:21.51 | file | yuck, $383 for toronto to moncton |
| 18:21.53 | blitzrage | flagged in the database |
| 18:21.59 | Qwell | ugh |
| 18:22.05 | blitzrage | immigration at the airport |
| 18:22.16 | blitzrage | yuck |
| 18:22.24 | blitzrage | M10297 |
| 18:22.24 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_skinny 0010297: Unload/load support for chan_skinny reported by DEA http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10297 |
| 18:22.31 | blitzrage | is this ready for testing, or does it need more work? |
| 18:23.11 | Juggie | blitzrage is a bad border hopper. |
| 18:23.15 | blitzrage | it's true |
| 18:23.19 | blitzrage | M4825 |
| 18:23.23 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Core/CodecInterface 0004825: [patch][post 1.4] New codec negotiation algorithm reported by bamby http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825 |
| 18:23.26 | blitzrage | is there anything that can be done here to move it forward? |
| 18:23.33 | Qwell | blitzrage: I don't think 10297 is ready |
| 18:23.43 | blitzrage | Qwell: ok, I didn't think so either, but thought I'd check |
| 18:25.05 | file | 10297 was a rough stab at it |
| 18:25.52 | blitzrage | I see |
| 18:31.03 | blitzrage | M10072 |
| 18:31.04 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_chanspy 0010072: [patch]: Added control over the spying party and ability to spy on calls both ways, including incoming on queue. reported by xmarksthespot http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10072 |
| 18:31.23 | putnopvut | Ah, a joetester patch. |
| 18:31.24 | blitzrage | code review? Worth my time to test? |
| 18:31.39 | putnopvut | He says it's good, I know that much. |
| 18:32.11 | blitzrage | ok... but that mean it's actually good? :) |
| 18:32.30 | putnopvut | I don't know. file, you know more about chanspy... |
| 18:32.37 | putnopvut | than I do, that is. |
| 18:33.00 | putnopvut | Of course, if file backports the audiohook chanspy, then 10072 may become null and void. |
| 18:33.04 | blitzrage | mostly curious if it would be a waste of my time to test that patch out to move it forward, or whether that is something that might go in... ? |
| 18:33.09 | blitzrage | right |
| 18:33.25 | blitzrage | I see he has a branch already... would that be something better to test? |
| 18:34.28 | putnopvut | blitzrage: I don't know if testing 10072 is worth it or not, considering that mvanbaak has already tested it himself. |
| 18:34.35 | blitzrage | true that |
| 18:34.37 | file | I would pass over 10072 |
| 18:34.45 | Qwell | 380 |
| 18:34.49 | putnopvut | I'm willing to bet the two of you probably would set up similar tests. |
| 18:35.07 | blitzrage | agreed |
| 18:35.09 | blitzrage | ok, passing over |
| 18:35.43 | russellb | blitzrage: testing file's audiohooks-1.4 branch would be welcome |
| 18:35.54 | russellb | just make use of MixMonitor and Chanspy |
| 18:35.54 | blitzrage | yes boss! |
| 18:35.56 | blitzrage | :D |
| 18:35.57 | russellb | make sure it doesn't blow up |
| 18:36.06 | russellb | heh |
| 18:36.09 | file | russellb: get off my brain waves |
| 18:36.13 | file | :( |
| 18:36.16 | blitzrage | i already have dialplan code for my clustered platforms I can use as a base |
| 18:36.16 | russellb | <3 |
| 18:36.24 | file | they aren't reference counted, if you try to use them and I destroy them... |
| 18:36.26 | file | that would be bad |
| 18:36.39 | russellb | blitzrage: perfect ... your complex setups are good at exposing bugs :-D |
| 18:36.42 | putnopvut | Yeah, russell would segfault. |
| 18:36.53 | blitzrage | russellb: ya, after that I might try trunk and find all sorts |
| 18:37.06 | russellb | hot |
| 18:37.16 | file | blitzrage: but yes, I just did a final once over look to make sure I didn't miss anything... but that branch should be okay |
| 18:37.28 | file | go off and expose bugs |
| 18:37.32 | blitzrage | sweet -- I'll start building a cluster then! |
| 18:37.43 | russellb | file: that's going to close like 15 bugs ... |
| 18:37.44 | blitzrage | wonder if Paul got that cluster built at Digium on the Xen boxes |
| 18:37.50 | file | russellb: I hopez |
| 18:38.12 | file | and if a few are still around at least I thoroughly know the code |
| 18:38.20 | blitzrage | aye |
| 18:38.30 | russellb | file: have you gone through all the bugs and asked people to try that branch? |
| 18:38.37 | file | russellb: in process |
| 18:38.42 | russellb | hawt |
| 18:38.51 | russellb | file: you rock |
| 18:38.54 | russellb | blitzrage: and you rock, too |
| 18:39.17 | russellb | keep up the good work, folks :) |
| 18:40.21 | blitzrage | thx :) |
| 18:40.50 | blitzrage | is anyone really good at setting up Xen machines at Digium? (instead of me figuring it out myself) |
| 18:40.54 | putnopvut | 379 |
| 18:40.56 | blitzrage | I think there is a doc on the wiki |
| 18:41.04 | blitzrage | but if someone knew how to do it in 5 mins... :) |
| 18:41.29 | putnopvut | I've never set up a vm. |
| 18:41.35 | blitzrage | heh |
| 18:41.56 | russellb | i have only used vmware ... and not at much |
| 18:42.04 | russellb | s/at/that/ |
| 18:42.05 | Qwell | blitzrage: MattN I think |
| 18:42.15 | putnopvut | Whoa, when did infobot come here? |
| 18:42.20 | Qwell | like a month ago :D |
| 18:44.12 | blitzrage | ok, then time for me to go learn Xen and build myself a cluster I suppose. My poor desktop here I don't think is powerful enough.... |
| 18:44.27 | blitzrage | hrmmm... maybe I'll try here first just to try and save some time |
| 18:44.39 | blitzrage | hopefully I get lucky :) |
| 18:45.54 | Qwell | 384 |
| 18:46.50 | putnopvut | Dangit, people need to stop submitting new bugs. It's messing with the count :) |
| 18:47.02 | blitzrage | :) |
| 18:47.05 | blitzrage | 8050 what?! |
| 18:47.13 | Qwell | it's still 379 :D |
| 18:47.21 | blitzrage | ya, was gonna say |
| 18:48.27 | russellb | i shall join! |
| 18:49.04 | blitzrage | just for fun |
| 18:49.10 | blitzrage | mostly because I like music |
| 18:49.29 | russellb | ... because i like music |
| 18:49.32 | blitzrage | :) |
| 18:49.38 | file | music is good |
| 18:50.58 | blitzrage | the worst part about this CentOS5 appliance is untar'ing it |
| 18:51.03 | blitzrage | takes a few mins... |
| 18:55.36 | blitzrage | :) |
| 18:55.45 | file | 378 |
| 18:58.19 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 18:58.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:03.20 | Qwell | I seem to have lost a bug |
| 19:04.57 | Qwell | M11096 |
| 19:04.58 | Qwell | yay |
| 19:04.59 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core-General 0011096: [patch] Modify the return values on load_module(). reported by eliel http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11096 |
| 19:06.23 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@62.49.235.130) |
| 19:08.28 | blitzrage | file: ummm... I think there is a bug here... |
| 19:08.42 | blitzrage | when I do "asterisk -rvvv" I get: |
| 19:08.52 | blitzrage | Usage: logger mute |
| 19:08.52 | blitzrage | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:08.52 | blitzrage | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:09.14 | file | O.o |
| 19:09.19 | blitzrage | nevermind |
| 19:09.30 | blitzrage | it happened because I didn't restart Asterisk |
| 19:09.32 | blitzrage | not doing it now |
| 19:09.42 | file | naughty. |
| 19:09.44 | russellb | putnopvut: ping |
| 19:10.15 | russellb | or Qwell: ping |
| 19:10.31 | russellb | I'm looking for someone that isn't extremely busy this afternoon, who could write a security advisory ... |
| 19:11.45 | putnopvut | russellb: sure, I'll do it. |
| 19:11.55 | russellb | ok, awesome |
| 19:11.57 | russellb | i'll jabber you. |
| 19:12.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 19:48.28 | blitzrage | file: well... it seems to work at least :) |
| 19:48.51 | blitzrage | now I guess I should look at the bugs and see if i can find how to make it crash |
| 20:08.12 | blitzrage | I'm not in HSV |
| 20:09.51 | Qwell | blitzrage: how about some Aroma's? |
| 20:09.58 | blitzrage | or that |
| 20:10.08 | blitzrage | I really hope they start using the HSV local mailing list for things like this soon |
| 20:10.10 | Qwell | don't feel bad, btw - the cupcakes were gone in like 8 seconds |
| 20:10.16 | Qwell | yeah, did they create one? |
| 20:10.36 | blitzrage | there has been one around already, which is supposed to come up in a managers meeting at some point |
| 20:10.42 | blitzrage | so in like 3 mths it should be resolved |
| 20:10.44 | Qwell | oh |
| 20:11.11 | Qwell | Skulltrail - what an interesting name for a CPU platform |
| 20:11.50 | blitzrage | oh... apparently that was supposed to be addressed on Oct 29th |
| 20:12.10 | Qwell | there was no managers meeting this week |
| 20:12.14 | blitzrage | makes sense |
| 20:12.15 | blitzrage | VON |
| 20:12.20 | blitzrage | so next week I guess |
| 20:12.41 | Qwell | that's a silly email address btw |
| 20:14.46 | blitzrage | indeed |
| 20:17.35 | file | survey rather |
| 20:19.42 | blitzrage | heh |
| 20:21.39 | Qwell | I said "the coffee you're giving us now sucks" |
| 20:21.52 | blitzrage | I don't drink coffee |
| 20:21.52 | Qwell | and I said that they should sell redbull :P |
| 20:22.09 | blitzrage | redline is better :) |
| 20:30.24 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@64.251.114.2) |
| 20:31.13 | putnopvut | M11120 |
| 20:31.14 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Sounds 0011120: Some sound files have zero length reported by DavidYerger http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11120 |
| 20:31.22 | putnopvut | This is assigned, but to no one... |
| 20:31.29 | putnopvut | How does that work? |
| 20:32.55 | Qwell | well, I set it to confirmed, but it didn't like it it seems.. fixing |
| 20:39.05 | file | putnopvut: you can do that |
| 20:39.30 | Qwell | "assigned" is really two fields. |
| 20:39.44 | Qwell | it's a category, and it points to a user |
| 20:39.59 | Qwell | they can be done separately - like you can have confirmed and assigned to me |
| 20:41.05 | putnopvut | I guess while we're talking about the bugtracker, what's the difference between "confirmed" and "acknowledged"? |
| 20:41.21 | blitzrage | everyone else can go home now |
| 20:41.24 | Qwell | confirmed is like "yes, it's a problem" |
| 20:41.38 | Qwell | acknowledged is like "meh, yeah, I see your report" |
| 20:45.56 | russellb | lol |
| 20:46.22 | russellb | i have gone through and written detailed workflows with descriptions for all the states before |
| 20:46.48 | russellb | i probably have it around somewhere if anyone cares |
| 20:47.17 | putnopvut | I pretty much use "assigned" "feedback" and "closed" |
| 20:47.30 | blitzrage | indeed |
| 20:47.37 | blitzrage | or License Required |
| 20:47.39 | Qwell | resolved |
| 20:47.42 | Qwell | > closed |
| 20:47.45 | putnopvut | Qwell: yeah |
| 20:47.48 | putnopvut | But it ends up closed. |
| 20:47.52 | Qwell | right |
| 21:04.30 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs eurodrew555 (n=eurodrew@host-84-9-36-247.bulldogdsl.com) |
| 21:13.37 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs eurodrew555 (n=eurodrew@host-84-9-36-247.bulldogdsl.com) |
| 23:11.31 | blitzrage | M11134 |
| 23:11.32 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core/PBX 0011134: Make the EXCEPTION() application use 'reason' instead of 'type' to get the error reason reported by blitzrage http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11134 |
| 23:11.54 | russellb | did you write a patch?!?! |
| 23:12.08 | blitzrage | YES!!! |
| 23:12.12 | russellb | that's hot! |
| 23:12.23 | blitzrage | hence my questions about structs :) |
| 23:12.33 | blitzrage | sooooooooo simple, but I tested and it works :) |
| 23:51.57 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
| 23:51.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |