| 03:46.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
| 03:46.54 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 08:07.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ZX81 (n=ZX81@202.20.97.211) |
| 08:27.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 08:32.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs sx|lappy (n=sxpert@lgit-1225.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr) |
| 09:02.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ZX81_ (n=ZX81@202.20.97.211) |
| 09:17.09 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@gw-sthlm01.rebtel.com) |
| 10:14.33 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@81.138.42.77) |
| 10:28.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls@81.138.42.77) |
| 11:24.58 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs flujan (n=flujan@200-160-115-020.static.spo.ctbc.com.br) |
| 13:59.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs flujan (n=flujan@200-160-115-020.static.spo.ctbc.com.br) |
| 14:02.43 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs flujan (n=flujan@200-160-115-020.static.spo.ctbc.com.br) |
| 14:09.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-home (n=snuffy@220-253-11-146.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
| 14:11.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs d1mas (n=chatzill@host-99.dataart.net) |
| 14:33.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1) |
| 14:33.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:26.46 | flujan | putnopvut: hi, how are you doing? :) |
| 15:26.58 | flujan | the queue lock issue is fixed by the patch... |
| 15:27.22 | flujan | up to now, no stops on the server... It is running on the production environment for 7 hours now. :D |
| 15:27.33 | putnopvut | All right. That's wonderful! |
| 15:34.56 | flujan | putnopvut: yes.. thank you sir. :D |
| 15:35.34 | flujan | putnopvut: lets wait for the 1.4.19 to have a vanilla asterisk install. :D |
| 15:37.19 | d1mas | file: are you doing bugs today? :) (hello) |
| 15:37.44 | file | yes yes yes.... |
| 15:37.45 | file | I know. |
| 15:38.50 | putnopvut | flujan: I don't understand what you mean. |
| 15:47.38 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 15:47.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 16:16.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguerom@h-68-167-124-171.cmbrmaor.covad.net) |
| 16:28.20 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
| 16:28.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 16:36.30 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ZX81 (n=ZX81@202.20.97.211) |
| 16:38.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 16:39.25 | flujan | putnopvut: A install without patchs and stuff.. :D |
| 16:39.39 | flujan | just a ./configure && make && make install. :D |
| 16:39.51 | flujan | do not need to apply patchs and stuff. :D |
| 16:40.42 | putnopvut | Oh, I see what you're saying. |
| 16:40.54 | d1mas | russelb: hello :) What is wrong with the following idea: there is a special thread (or set of threads) which constantly run the code of ast_read for every channel in the system. The frames returned are put to special buffer in ast_channel. The ast_read never blocks - just returns the frame from the buffer? |
| 16:42.14 | flujan | putnopvut: I need to fill another bug, dunno if it is a bug or a feature... I set busy-limit=1 and call-limit=2 to my agents... with this behavior, even if a agent is already on a call it receives other call from the queue. |
| 16:42.42 | flujan | putnopvut: I believe that thoe queue try_calling is not considering this, am I right? |
| 16:44.46 | putnopvut | Have you set ringinuse=no for the queue? |
| 16:45.03 | putnopvut | And are you using realtime SIP peers? |
| 16:45.59 | d1mas | russelb=russellb, sorry |
| 16:47.26 | russellb | d1mas: sorry, busy, let me think and get back to you |
| 16:47.45 | d1mas | sure |
| 17:02.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguerom@h-68-167-124-171.cmbrmaor.covad.net) |
| 17:25.03 | lmadsen | hrmm... ok... can someone tell me if I'm crazy in thinking that the dialplan is executing a function even though the application is returning false on the condition? |
| 17:25.04 | lmadsen | http://www.pastebin.ca/896438 |
| 17:25.15 | lmadsen | it seems like asterisk is executing the function even when it shouldn't be |
| 17:26.41 | BBHoss | looks that way |
| 17:26.57 | lmadsen | ya... |
| 17:32.57 | lmadsen | I opened a bug |
| 17:33.07 | lmadsen | M11957 |
| 17:33.09 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_exec 0011957: It appears that a true branch is executed even when ExecIf() returns false reported by blitzrage http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11957 |
| 17:33.40 | lmadsen | it'll probably get closed because that's the way the parsing engine works.. but I opened it anyways |
| 17:51.49 | flujan | putnopvut: no, I am using static sip.conf file |
| 17:51.56 | flujan | and I do not set this option... |
| 17:52.13 | putnopvut | Try setting the option and see if that fixes the problem. |
| 17:52.37 | putnopvut | ringinuse is designed to no attempt ringing members if their device is "in use" |
| 17:52.55 | putnopvut | Since you have a call-limit set and you're not using realtime sip peers, that should work for your setup. |
| 17:57.38 | flujan | putnopvut: for call-limit =1 it works flawless but sometimes the user need to receive and place a call... I will check and let you know about it. :D |
| 17:58.14 | putnopvut | Right, call-limit=1 is not a good idea for the reason you mentioned. |
| 18:05.47 | flujan | putnopvut: with call-limit=2 and busy-level=1 and ringinuse=no on the queues.conf I start seeing Ring+Inuse on the queue. |
| 18:06.12 | flujan | putnopvut: so I believe it is not reading the ringinuse=no option or is just ignoring it. |
| 18:06.14 | flujan | :( |
| 18:06.36 | putnopvut | What happens if you remove the busy-level? |
| 18:06.54 | putnopvut | And where did you place the ringinuse option? |
| 18:07.35 | flujan | on the queues.conf general options. |
| 18:17.06 | flujan | putnopvut: and with or without the busy-level I still see the Ring+Inuse on the queue. :( |
| 18:17.28 | flujan | it just delivers calls fast with the call-limit=1 |
| 18:17.30 | flujan | :( |
| 18:17.51 | putnopvut | Okay, that's the problem. You need to put the ringinuse option inside the queue definition, not in the general section. |
| 18:18.15 | flujan | ok, since it is realtime I will try it.. |
| 18:18.15 | flujan | just a second. |
| 18:18.21 | putnopvut | Okay, thanks. |
| 18:36.55 | lmadsen | putnopvut: so can I change 11957 to acknowledged? |
| 18:38.31 | putnopvut | lmadsen: Yeah, that sounds good. |
| 18:39.30 | lmadsen | I think I'm gonna change the title to, "Functions are executed before a condition is evaluated" |
| 18:40.03 | lmadsen | and done :) |
| 18:40.26 | putnopvut | All right. |
| 18:40.52 | lmadsen | thx for the response |
| 18:41.47 | flujan | putnopvut: yeap, solved. :) Thanks for the tip. :D |
| 18:42.20 | putnopvut | Great! |
| 19:00.23 | flujan | putnopvut: last question, the autofill=yes should be used on the general or also inside the queue configuration? |
| 19:00.44 | putnopvut | inside the queue configuration. |
| 19:14.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 19:18.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Hemos\ (n=cyberspa@host120-205-static.104-80-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 19:47.23 | jmls | if I wanted to use curl from another * application, should I use the acf_curl_exec function in func_curl.c ? |
| 19:48.31 | jmls | or can I just use the CURL function itself ? |
| 19:51.56 | JunK-Y | u can use the CURL function directly. |
| 19:56.47 | jmls | JunK-Y: thanks |
| 19:57.03 | jmls | So I would just say CURL(foo) etc ? |
| 19:57.22 | Corydon76-dig | jmls: Read res_config_curl |
| 19:57.41 | jmls | that uses ast_variables |
| 19:57.48 | jmls | helper thingy |
| 19:57.53 | Corydon76-dig | Correct |
| 19:58.04 | Corydon76-dig | pbx_substitute_variables_helper |
| 19:58.11 | jmls | but I don't want to set channel variables, just send data |
| 19:58.26 | Corydon76-dig | What do you think CURL is? |
| 19:59.22 | jmls | sorry, don't understand the question |
| 20:00.16 | Corydon76-dig | CURL() is essentially a variable |
| 20:00.16 | JunK-Y | jmls: CURL going pbx_substitute_variables_helper() if im correct. |
| 20:00.25 | Corydon76-dig | So to get it to go, you ask Asterisk to perform substitution on a string that contains that variable |
| 20:00.40 | Corydon76-dig | and then just ignore the result, if you like |
| 20:00.51 | jmls | ohhhh, ok |
| 20:01.00 | Corydon76-dig | but you still have to run it to get it to go |
| 20:59.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs infobot (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
| 20:59.48 | *** topic/#asterisk-bugs is Asterisk Bugs Discussion -=- http://bugs.digium.com/ -=- http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines - If you are not discussing a report already posted to the bugtracker, the discussion probably belongs in #asterisk. -=- Overall issue count: 328 -=- Monitor new reports in #asterisk-commits -=- Want to help? Test bugs marked Ready For Testing |
| 22:08.25 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs monkeytype (n=Bill@216.207.245.1) |
| 22:55.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |