| 01:48.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@76.29.239.233) |
| 01:48.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 04:14.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:14.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o file] by irc.freenode.net |
| 04:20.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:20.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o file] by irc.freenode.net |
| 04:32.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs implicit (n=implicit@ip72-211-213-26.oc.oc.cox.net) |
| 04:32.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o implicit] by ChanServ |
| 06:41.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls (n=jmls_hom@mail.tessera.co.uk) |
| 07:50.47 | mvanbaak | hhmm |
| 07:50.56 | mvanbaak | mantis is sending empty mails every now and then |
| 08:19.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 11:11.05 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs DagMoller (n=aguirre@unaffiliated/dagmoller) |
| 12:21.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:53.50 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1) |
| 12:53.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 13:04.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Victor_Yure (n=Victor_Y@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 13:48.02 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:48.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 14:11.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mbranca (n=matteo@mi-gw1.voismart.net) |
| 15:11.55 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs seanbright (i=seanbrig@65.207.74.18) |
| 15:23.57 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 15:24.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@216.207.245.1) |
| 16:09.07 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 16:39.26 | *** topic/#asterisk-bugs by Qwell -> Asterisk Bugs Discussion -=- http://bugs.digium.com/ -=- http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines - If you are not discussing a report already posted to the bugtracker, the discussion probably belongs in #asterisk. -=- Best overall issue count: 272 -=- Monitor new reports in #asterisk-commits -=- Test bugs marked Ready For Testing -=- Mantis happy now. |
| 16:47.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs gaetronik (n=gaetan@200.111.138.170) |
| 16:49.20 | gaetronik | Hi |
| 16:49.35 | gaetronik | i wan't to ask if a bug is known befor filling a bug report |
| 16:49.42 | Qwell | ask away |
| 16:50.10 | gaetronik | when i do several asterisk -r -x "queue show" i didn't get always all my queues |
| 16:50.22 | gaetronik | i don't use any realtime things+ |
| 16:50.32 | Qwell | sounds like a bug |
| 16:51.09 | Corydon76-vcch | gaetronik: are you running asterisk with the -p option? |
| 16:51.29 | gaetronik | i don't think, but i will verify |
| 16:51.39 | Corydon76-vcch | The method we use for determining the end of output is a length of silence |
| 16:51.51 | gaetronik | 24844 ? Sl 343:04 /usr/sbin/asterisk -f -vvvg -c |
| 16:53.07 | gaetronik | the problem is that i can't stopthe service for doing an upgrade |
| 16:53.26 | gaetronik | i'm using a 1.4.16.2 |
| 16:57.16 | gaetronik | it's not alway reproductible |
| 16:57.24 | gaetronik | looks like depends on load |
| 17:07.39 | Corydon76-vcch | Yeah, load would be a reason why the console would pause |
| 17:08.01 | Corydon76-vcch | and hence -x would sense it needed to disconnect |
| 17:11.36 | Corydon76-vcch | If you wanted to increase the timeout, you could try increasing the 3rd parameter to poll() inside ast_remotecontrol |
| 17:12.11 | Corydon76-vcch | 200 should be sufficient |
| 17:12.56 | Juggie | Corydon76-dig, isnt -x pretty flawed anyway, on a busy system with verbose/debug etc enabled are you not likely to get other stuff in your output besides your request. |
| 17:13.02 | Corydon76-vcch | The danger of making the value too high is that it might never disconnect |
| 17:13.12 | Corydon76-vcch | Juggie: correct |
| 17:13.42 | Juggie | its not really the best way to get information from asterisk |
| 17:13.48 | Corydon76-vcch | The only foolproof way of doing that is with an AMI connection and an Action: Command, since you decide when to disconnect |
| 17:14.04 | Juggie | right. |
| 17:14.56 | Corydon76-vcch | The problem is that on the console, there is no identifier used with CLI command output to distinguish it from other output |
| 17:21.41 | gaetronik | ok i will use an ami command instead of my poor script |
| 17:29.03 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 17:35.39 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Victor_Yure (n=Victor_Y@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 17:53.28 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 18:27.37 | putnopvut | M11963 |
| 18:27.39 | MuffinMan | [feedback] [Asterisk] Resources/res_snmp 0011963: res_snmp.sohangs asterisk at startup reported by amessina http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11963 |
| 18:27.45 | putnopvut | Can this be closed based on the last comment added? |
| 18:29.12 | Qwell | works for me |
| 18:32.34 | codefreeze | In bug 12364, which I reported, and is assigned to mwa, I propose a two line fix to the get_ilbc_source.sh script, that corrects the newly downloaded code to avoid a compiler problem on 64 bit ubuntu... is that OK? |
| 18:40.45 | putnopvut | codefreeze: I think it makes sense to not have buggy code, but I'm not sure it's our responsibility to do that. Also, I have absolutely no idea if doing that violates licenses and such. |
| 18:42.08 | codefreeze | shrugs... **we** don't make the change. The user that runs the download script makes the change... |
| 18:42.57 | putnopvut | right...that's why theses license-related things are always mega-confusing to me and I try to not do anything unless I'm told it's okay. |
| 18:43.39 | codefreeze | yeah, me too. THat's why I present the question, and hesitate to commit |
| 18:45.00 | codefreeze | If the license says you can't modify anything, then that would be bad. But few such source level licenses actually do that. If they are that paranoid about changes to the code, then they usually distribute binaries. |
| 20:34.28 | jsmith | codefreeze: When in doubt, talk to Kevin |
| 20:37.01 | mvanbaak | when in doubt, commit without testing |
| 20:37.02 | mvanbaak | ;) |
| 20:37.30 | Juggie | i'd like to know who actually uses ilbc. |
| 20:38.21 | mvanbaak | Juggie: why ? |
| 20:38.31 | mvanbaak | what about it ? |
| 20:38.37 | Juggie | because its not a very good codec |
| 20:38.48 | mvanbaak | it's better then gsm |
| 20:39.17 | mvanbaak | actually, it sounds pretty ok |
| 20:39.38 | Juggie | anyway using a script to fix someone elses code automatically |
| 20:39.44 | Juggie | thats a pretty slippery slope |
| 20:40.08 | mvanbaak | script, patches, fork in your own svn |
| 20:40.12 | mvanbaak | what's the difference |
| 20:44.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |