| 01:17.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs d3wayne (n=deeewayn@76.29.245.9) |
| 05:57.57 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 06:58.09 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=AGX@host63-216-static.34-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 07:44.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mbranca (n=matteo@mi-gw1.voismart.net) |
| 08:15.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs implicit (n=implicit@ip68-105-92-210.sd.sd.cox.net) |
| 08:15.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o implicit] by ChanServ |
| 08:52.32 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mbranca (n=matteo@mi-gw1.voismart.net) |
| 08:54.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mbranca (n=matteo@mi-gw1.voismart.net) |
| 10:00.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Juggie (i=Juggie@CPE001601df17fb-CM001a6682d7b6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 10:00.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jmls_home (n=jmls_hom@mail.tessera.co.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 10:00.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak (n=michiel@vanbaak.xs4all.nl) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 10:00.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 10:00.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Juggie] by irc.freenode.net |
| 11:25.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs DagMoller (n=aguirre@unaffiliated/dagmoller) |
| 12:09.23 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 13:09.46 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:09.47 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 14:05.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1) |
| 14:05.54 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:25.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs implicit (n=implicit@ip68-105-92-210.sd.sd.cox.net) |
| 14:25.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o implicit] by ChanServ |
| 14:52.11 | putnopvut | M12309 |
| 14:52.13 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core-General 0012309: * segfault when not using DONT_OPTIMIZE flag reported by junky http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12309 |
| 14:52.25 | putnopvut | Would I be impaled if I went ahead and closed this as a compiler bug? |
| 14:53.56 | file | probably not. |
| 15:16.15 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@216.207.245.1) |
| 15:34.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 15:50.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs DagMoller (n=aguirre@unaffiliated/dagmoller) |
| 16:42.11 | JunK-Y | putnopvut: any idea would would cause this? we never used a compiler bug when using 1.2. |
| 16:43.18 | putnopvut | JunK-Y: I have no idea what could cause that. It seems odd to me that the issue would only happen when optimizations are turned on. |
| 16:45.40 | JunK-Y | its the opposite, it only happens when it is not. |
| 16:46.19 | Corydon76-dig | JunK-Y: the bug says the opposite |
| 16:46.44 | Corydon76-dig | "segfault when NOT using DONT_OPTIMIZE flag" |
| 16:47.01 | Corydon76-dig | in other words, segfault when optimizations are on |
| 16:47.29 | Corydon76-dig | We've seen a few places where the newest gcc has additional optimizations that cause bugs in the -O3 range |
| 16:48.38 | Juggie | JunK-Y, how was the drive to montreal |
| 16:50.36 | JunK-Y | ha then i expressed myself in a bad way, its crashing when the flag isnt there. |
| 16:50.53 | JunK-Y | Juggie: not bad, we only stopped in brockville for the redbull-break |
| 16:51.19 | JunK-Y | we had like 5 minutes of slowdown when getting out of downtown |
| 16:51.35 | Corydon76-dig | JunK-Y: right, which is the same as saying that optimizations are turned on |
| 16:51.50 | Corydon76-dig | The flag is backwards (on when optimizations are off) |
| 16:51.58 | Juggie | so its crashing when its optimized. |
| 16:52.17 | JunK-Y | exact |
| 16:52.25 | Juggie | silly french guys :) |
| 16:52.26 | Corydon76-dig | Right, and we've seen some recent compiler bugs with recent gcc versions |
| 16:52.32 | JunK-Y | i will try to a previous gcc soon. |
| 16:52.44 | Corydon76-dig | JunK-Y: what version were you using? |
| 16:52.47 | JunK-Y | Juggie: silly french guys that eat slowly huh? :) |
| 16:52.57 | JunK-Y | 3.4 iirc |
| 16:52.58 | Juggie | yeah |
| 16:53.04 | Juggie | you are SOOOO slow |
| 16:53.17 | Corydon76-dig | JunK-Y: Try 4.1.2. I've had good success with that version |
| 16:53.29 | Juggie | i ate a large fries, and 2 big macs, and junky was not even 1/2 way though one bigmac and a regular fries |
| 16:53.40 | Juggie | and he started eating when i got in the mcdonalds lineup |
| 16:53.42 | putnopvut | yuck, McDonald's. |
| 16:53.56 | Juggie | we wanted something quick |
| 16:54.04 | Juggie | and we ate at every other resturant on the street :) |
| 16:54.36 | JunK-Y | juggie: im sick like crazy now, so i think i was even slower than habitual, since i was not feeling all right. |
| 16:54.45 | JunK-Y | Corydon76-dig: will try with 4.1.2. |
| 16:55.08 | JunK-Y | offers a good bigmac to putnopvut :) |
| 16:55.09 | Juggie | JunK-Y, its going aroun |
| 16:55.12 | Juggie | everyone is sick |
| 16:55.38 | JunK-Y | silly ontarian that bring this shit :) |
| 16:55.44 | Juggie | *around |
| 16:55.50 | Juggie | hey i'm not sick |
| 16:56.32 | JunK-Y | even if its you, i will survive and i still love you :) |
| 17:00.39 | Juggie | ummmmmmmmm |
| 17:00.42 | Juggie | hides |
| 17:08.55 | Corydon76-dig | #asterisk-bugs: spreading the love... |
| 17:09.43 | putnopvut | 46% of asterisk-bugs are contracted through the spread of love. |
| 18:55.34 | Qwell | M12351 |
| 18:55.37 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/NewFeature 0012351: [patch] Permit dialplan to control if more digits should be entered reported by Corydon76 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12351 |
| 18:55.39 | Qwell | sounds like that's about ready to go in |
| 19:41.31 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs bkruse (n=bkruse@216.207.245.1) |
| 22:04.03 | jsmith | Oooh! |
| 22:04.06 | jsmith | I found a bug! |
| 22:06.04 | Corydon76-dig | Are you sure? |
| 22:09.25 | jsmith | Well, it's not a big bug |
| 22:09.28 | jsmith | But yes, I'm quite sure. |
| 22:09.55 | jsmith | CLI tab completion doesn't work for "agi show" |
| 22:11.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs implicit (n=implicit@ip68-105-92-210.sd.sd.cox.net) |
| 22:11.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o implicit] by ChanServ |
| 22:11.13 | Corydon76-dig | jsmith: unimplemented, I'm sure |
| 22:11.39 | jsmith | Oh, not a bug then :-( |
| 22:22.10 | Qwell | the for loop on line 1511 of chan_unistim hurts my head |
| 22:22.25 | Qwell | it appears to only work by sheer chance |
| 22:23.39 | putnopvut | Qwell: why? |
| 22:24.00 | putnopvut | Do you mean the exit conditions or the sprintf inside? |
| 22:24.02 | Qwell | because SIZE_HEADER just so happens to be the size of the mac address in the struct... |
| 22:24.23 | Qwell | and I'm still not clear why it's starting at 15 |
| 22:25.30 | putnopvut | Qwell: perhaps the 15 byte firmware version string goes in the buffer first? |
| 22:27.26 | Qwell | in order to get there, it had to match buf+SIZE_HEADER to the mac address |
| 22:28.02 | putnopvut | Okay, so...SIZE_HEADER is 6. |
| 22:28.07 | Qwell | yeah.. |
| 22:28.39 | putnopvut | So the buffer contains six bytes, followed by a mac address. |
| 22:28.41 | Qwell | which accounts for 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x9a, 0x0d in packet_recv_mac_addr |
| 22:28.51 | Qwell | then the mac address starts 0x07... |
| 22:29.47 | Qwell | wait, buf + 6 matches packet_recv_mac_addr |
| 22:30.31 | Qwell | you can see the confusion :p |
| 22:30.35 | putnopvut | yeah. |
| 22:31.03 | putnopvut | Mac address is FF:FF:FF:FF:9a:0d:07:31:38? |
| 22:31.21 | Qwell | no, the mac starts 07:31:38:.. |
| 22:31.30 | Qwell | I think? |
| 22:32.03 | Qwell | (no combination of the above mapped to Nortel on the ieee mac address list) |
| 22:32.24 | putnopvut | Well, the memcmp is comparing the contents at buf+SIZE_HEADER to the contents of packet_recv_mac_addr |
| 22:33.10 | putnopvut | So, it makes me think that that Mac address is hard-coded in the packet? |
| 22:33.13 | putnopvut | wtf? |
| 22:33.18 | putnopvut | Do I just totally not get this? |