| 00:06.58 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-ed9cab03995b843d) |
| 01:05.58 | bearded_blitz | M13790 |
| 01:06.00 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Applications/app_queue 0013790: Queue stats are no longer reset by 'reload' or 'module reload app_queue.so' reported by bcnit (Karma: +3.00) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13790 |
| 07:03.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 07:34.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs seanbright (n=sean@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/seanbright) |
| 07:34.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o seanbright] by ChanServ |
| 10:14.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@213.136.49.145) |
| 10:52.41 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:13.33 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim) |
| 12:14.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs shazaum (n=shazaum@unaffiliated/shazaum) |
| 12:15.20 | shazaum | morning... |
| 13:32.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:32.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 14:30.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs gaetronik (n=gaetan@eficaz2.manquehue.net) |
| 14:30.17 | gaetronik | Hi there |
| 14:33.27 | jsmith | Good ${EPOCH}, all... |
| 14:34.31 | gaetronik | i have new hints for bug 11373 |
| 14:35.43 | gaetronik | it crashes only for a connexion who make Action QueueStatus |
| 14:35.55 | lmadsen | M11373 |
| 14:35.56 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Core/ManagerInterface 0011373: crash at manager.c pointer error reported by enst (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11373 |
| 14:36.17 | gaetronik | and the s structure carry size value with garbage in the core |
| 14:36.28 | lmadsen | gaetronik: this is with a recent version of asterisk? |
| 14:36.33 | gaetronik | 1.4.21.1 |
| 14:36.50 | lmadsen | cool, are you requesting the bug re-opened so you can add the information requested? |
| 14:37.00 | lmadsen | i.e. you have the valgrind report? |
| 14:38.43 | gaetronik | i have no valgrind report |
| 14:39.01 | gaetronik | i will post one in less than a week |
| 14:39.30 | gaetronik | time for * to crash twice |
| 14:42.07 | lmadsen | gaetronik: ok, please come ask for the report to be reopened when you have valgrind output as per the developers request |
| 14:42.15 | gaetronik | ok |
| 14:42.25 | lmadsen | and we'll be happy to do that for you |
| 14:42.27 | lmadsen | thanks! |
| 14:54.50 | lmadsen | Corydon76-dig: ping? |
| 14:54.55 | lmadsen | M13919 |
| 14:54.57 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_iax2 0013919: [patch] Asterisk core dumps random reported by barthpbx (Karma: +1.00) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13919 |
| 14:55.15 | lmadsen | can you review the patch and commit if appropriate? Reporter states issue is resolved by the patch. |
| 14:55.36 | lmadsen | needs another status in the bug tracker that says, "Ready For Review" |
| 14:55.44 | lmadsen | jpeeler: any idea how hard that would be to add? |
| 14:56.01 | lmadsen | we could just rename Pending Release Branch to that since it's never used |
| 14:58.31 | lmadsen | hrmmm... what would also be cool is setting to that status, is causing a trigger to request which patch gets posted to reviewboard (but that's something that is obviously more complex than just changing the wording of a status) |
| 15:15.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs seanbright (n=sean@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/seanbright) |
| 15:15.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o seanbright] by ChanServ |
| 15:21.24 | lmadsen | heads off for his appointment at the gym |
| 15:26.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-9bd21b276a6a76f1) |
| 15:26.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 15:39.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
| 16:24.08 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-ff2c9ba78e685fe9) |
| 16:24.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 16:34.52 | jpeeler | lmadsen: adding the status wouldn't be hard |
| 16:35.04 | jpeeler | the second thing... harder |
| 17:34.26 | lmadsen | jpeeler: yes, the 2nd thing was more of a, "hey, that's a neat idea", but I figured the first thing should be a fairly trivial change? |
| 17:34.39 | lmadsen | and we're not even using Pending Release Branch anymore, so I figure we just need to rename that status |
| 17:35.05 | jpeeler | actually it's turning out to not be so trivial for some reason, but say go ahead if it is what you really want/need |
| 17:36.32 | lmadsen | oh really? hrmmm... well that sucks. I figured it'd be a really nice status so that when I find a bug that was Ready For Testing, that someone came back and said, "hey! it works!" then I could set it to that status so the devs could review it and then commit if it made sense to do so |
| 17:37.02 | lmadsen | I suppose I could just go ahead and use Pending Release Branch for that status, then when you have some time to fix the words it should just change... ? |
| 17:47.45 | jpeeler | well i was going to work on it now |
| 17:47.55 | jpeeler | but that would certainly work |
| 17:50.52 | lmadsen | jpeeler: i just didn't want to distract u from something more important |
| 17:51.44 | jpeeler | it shouldn't take too long |
| 17:51.55 | jpeeler | just turns out a simple text modification doesn't work |
| 17:52.24 | lmadsen | gotcha |
| 17:58.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak_ (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 18:46.02 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mnicholson (n=mnichols@nat/digium/x-3e302fefc436dcfc) |
| 19:04.05 | caio1982 | is svn.digium.com down or something? it's redirecting to mantis and even direct urls to some branch via viewvc is returning 404 |
| 19:04.49 | file | yes it is currently unavailable |
| 19:05.55 | caio1982 | ah ok :) |
| 19:06.01 | caio1982 | thanks file |
| 19:06.24 | jsmith | caio1982: An email went out to the -dev list informing developers that it was down for maintenance |
| 19:07.23 | caio1982 | law of the universe #15, you should never read ML emails during your finals :D |
| 19:07.30 | caio1982 | jsmith: sorry, will check that next time hehe |
| 19:07.42 | jsmith | caio1982: Good point... |
| 19:07.52 | jsmith | caio1982: Probably shouldn't hang out in IRC either, though :-p |
| 19:08.27 | caio1982 | hmm you happen to be right i guess :) |
| 21:28.14 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 21:28.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 22:25.01 | lmadsen | M13243 |
| 22:25.02 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/CodecHandling 0013243: [patch] Set(SIP_CODEC=xxxx) only applies to first inbound leg of call reported by samdell3 (Karma: +1.75) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13243 |
| 22:25.24 | lmadsen | putnopvut: how many bugs do you have assigned to you? there is a patch there for review (so hopefully that means not too much work?) |
| 22:25.33 | putnopvut | lmadsen: let's see... |
| 22:25.46 | lmadsen | perhaps that is something that should be posted to reviewboard |
| 22:25.47 | putnopvut | 14 issues assigned to me. |
| 22:25.55 | lmadsen | ohhh... that means I can assign 1 more :) |
| 22:26.06 | putnopvut | oh boy! |
| 22:26.08 | lmadsen | chooses to save it for a really good one |
| 22:26.22 | lmadsen | hrmmm... I need to find more issues to assign to mnicholson :) |
| 22:27.09 | mnicholson | heh, still working on the ones you gave me, finally got my test environment working |
| 22:28.00 | putnopvut | mnicholson: has he been loading you down yet? |
| 22:28.01 | putnopvut | :) |
| 22:28.06 | lmadsen | mnicholson: w00t! |
| 22:28.20 | lmadsen | not yet... he hasn't hit the 2 digit mark yet :) |
| 22:28.48 | putnopvut | M13531 |
| 22:28.50 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/General 0013531: [patch] Hold logic broken? reported by sgofferj (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13531 |
| 22:29.10 | putnopvut | Based on time, and the reporter's latest comment, should I go ahead and commit the bastage? |
| 22:29.30 | mnicholson | putnopvut, nope, I only have 2 issues :) |
| 22:29.34 | lmadsen | ummm.... is it a fairly safe change? :) |
| 22:29.45 | lmadsen | oh it looks simple enough |
| 22:29.50 | lmadsen | I'd say commit it |
| 22:29.51 | putnopvut | lmadsen: yeah, it changes an integer comparison to an unsigned 64-bit integer comparison. |
| 22:29.54 | putnopvut | Very safe. |
| 22:29.59 | lmadsen | I'd say just go ahead |
| 22:30.06 | putnopvut | Cool. Will do. |
| 22:30.09 | lmadsen | especially since you got feedback it appears to have worked |
| 22:30.22 | putnopvut | The tricky part is determining whether this is a regression or not. |
| 22:30.34 | putnopvut | Because technically, we didn't even look at the version number in the o line of the SDP in 1.4 |
| 22:30.48 | putnopvut | But then again, the hold functionality worked for the reporter in 1.4, but not in 1.6.0 |
| 22:30.55 | putnopvut | thinks it's fine to commit to 1.6.0 |
| 22:31.32 | lmadsen | I would agree |
| 22:39.11 | lmadsen | M12036 |
| 22:39.13 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Channels/NewFeature 0012036: [patch] RFC 3372 SIP-T receive implementation reported by gasparz (Karma: +1.00) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12036 |
| 22:39.20 | lmadsen | any interest in actually moving that issue forward? |
| 22:40.49 | lmadsen | heh... the 4 oldest issues (in terms of last updated) in the bug tracker are chan_misdn related |
| 22:42.55 | Qwell | lmadsen: 5 oldest ;/ |
| 22:43.07 | lmadsen | ooo! :) |
| 22:43.31 | lmadsen | and next two that follow are chan_mobile :( |
| 22:44.58 | Qwell | yes! |
| 22:46.49 | seanbright | would chan_mobile work with an iphone? |
| 22:47.07 | seanbright | i'm guessing no |
| 22:48.12 | lmadsen | I'd think it'd work with my Nokia E61i though |
| 22:48.41 | seanbright | iphone supports very limited profiles |
| 22:48.44 | seanbright | i think just headset |
| 22:49.43 | lmadsen | M12794 |
| 22:49.45 | MuffinMan | [new] [LibPRI] General 0012794: Unknown IE 26 (Unknown Information Element) reported by hellc2 (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12794 |
| 22:50.14 | lmadsen | He mentions AOC in the bug note. Does that mean it should be related to 7494? |
| 22:50.16 | lmadsen | M7494 |
| 22:50.19 | MuffinMan | [acknowledged] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_zap/NewFeature 0007494: [patch][post 1.4] Decoding / Encoding / sending AOC-D messages ("Advice of charge") reported by alexmayrhofer (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7494 |
| 22:58.11 | Deeewayne | lmadsen: I think those two issues are related |
| 22:58.21 | lmadsen | Deeewayne: thx, I will create a relationship |
| 23:19.52 | lmadsen | M12575 |
| 23:19.54 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core/Jitterbuffer 0012575: IAX forcejitterbuffer + maxjitterbuffer reported by nvrpunk (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12575 |
| 23:20.30 | lmadsen | someone is recommending (stevedavies) that a commit by jim dixon at r52494 be reverted which may resolve that issue |
| 23:20.38 | lmadsen | (in chan_iax2.c) |