IRC log for #asterisk-bugs on 20081124

04:25.21*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir_ (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
06:28.44*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
06:59.59*** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se)
08:44.50*** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak (i=mvanbaak@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak)
09:55.05*** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak (i=mvanbaak@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak)
11:26.08*** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982)
11:40.00*** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim)
12:59.42*** join/#asterisk-bugs shazaum (n=shazaum@unaffiliated/shazaum)
13:00.11shazaumhi guys
13:04.40shazaumfile putnopvut , yo
13:07.43*** join/#asterisk-bugs shido6 (n=shido6@209.114.208.111)
13:12.58*** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
13:12.58*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ
15:39.12Entomologist*** CLOSED (13950) [Channels/chan_sip/Registration] on excessive registraton failures: security feature to lockout the IP
15:39.12EntomologistReported by: jperry999  Karma: 0
15:39.12Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13950
15:39.12Entomologist*********************************************************
16:02.40*** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-46e65ec17e34f6c8)
16:02.40*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ
16:26.11*** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler)
16:26.42Entomologist*** CLOSED (13924) [General] new user extension above 6049 block voicemail extension
16:26.42EntomologistAssigned to: pari
16:26.42EntomologistReported by: linvinus  Karma: 1
16:26.42Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13924
16:26.42Entomologist*********************************************************
17:07.58*** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-lap (n=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home)
17:07.58*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ
17:08.25*** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se)
17:19.36guax!bug 13538
17:19.55guax=/
17:21.55DagMollerguax, eh no plural
17:22.06DagMoller!bugs 13538
17:22.06guax!bugs 13538
17:22.06Corydon76-lapM13538
17:22.08MuffinMan[assigned] [Asterisk] Applications/app_mixmonitor 0013538: [patch] Recording stops after Transfer when using MixMonitor() reported by mbit (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13538
17:22.20guaxDagMoller: yep, it works
17:22.21Corydon76-lapM, as in Mantis
17:22.30DagMollerguax, hehe
17:33.14*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
17:50.58*** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982_ (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982)
18:11.04Entomologist*** CLOSED (13946) [Applications/NewFeature] [patch] Add new application MinivmMWI to app_minivm.c
18:11.04EntomologistAssigned to: otherwiseguy
18:11.04EntomologistReported by: Marquis  Karma: 14.25
18:11.04Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13946
18:11.04Entomologist*********************************************************
18:15.10lmadsenw00t
18:28.51jsmithAwesome!
18:28.55jsmithDid it get accepted?
18:39.24lmadsenit was commited
18:39.37lmadsenr158808 into trunk
19:29.40Entomologist*** CLOSED (12941) [Channels/chan_sip/Registration] Failing registrations to peer via DNS name breaks all other peers
19:29.40EntomologistReported by: btrain1227  Karma: 0
19:29.40Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12941
19:29.40Entomologist*********************************************************
19:38.41lmadsenM13863
19:38.43MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] General 0013863: [patch] 1.6.1 beta2 does not build on PPC reported by jcollie (Karma: +89.75) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13863
19:38.56lmadsenis there anyone in here I can assign that issue to? I don't even know who here still runs on PPC...
19:58.04lmadsenM13828
19:58.05MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Core/General 0013828: !! Unknown IE 50 (cs5, Unknown Information Element) & RTCP SR transmission error, rtcp halted reported by fdecher (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13828
19:58.32lmadsenis this actually a bug? or just a NOTICE/WARNING on the console?  (i.e. please see asterisk-users for support)
19:59.07lmadsenI'm just gonna close it, because I think it is just logging
20:01.26lmadsenmeh... i'll be nice and let him respond
20:09.01mvanbaakwhat we really need to fix is the warning in ./configure "Report this at www.asterisk.org"
20:11.38mvanbaaklmadsen: wouldn't it be nice if you set a bug to 'ready for review' that the thing will get thrown at reviewboard automagically ?
20:12.14lmadsenmvanbaak: heh, yes, I had mentioned that, but that will require more work than was required to change 'pending release branch' --> 'ready for review'
20:12.20lmadsenbut I agree, that was the 2nd part I had mentioned
20:12.39lmadsenmvanbaak: that should really be changed to 'Report this at bugs.digium.com' :)
20:15.31mvanbaakgheh
20:15.40mvanbaakthis is fun:
20:16.13mvanbaak% grep -rni 'Report this to www.asterisk.org' * | wc -l
20:16.13mvanbaak<PROTECTED>
20:47.10Qwelllooks at Entomologist
20:51.47*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
20:53.11mnicholsonshould bug 13883 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13883) be fixed in 1.6.0?  This could break applications developed against 1.6.0.
20:56.09mnicholsonanyone have objections to adding EVENT_FLAG_AGI as presented in bug 13873 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13873)?
20:56.14Qwellit isn't really a bug.. it's just inconsistent
20:56.24mnicholsoni consider it a bug
20:57.05mnicholsonwell, I should add to that, but I agree with you
20:57.15Qwelltricky
20:57.27mnicholsonim not sure it qualifies as a bug to be fixed in a previous release
20:57.41Qwellis the Join event new?
20:57.45mnicholsonno
20:58.51Corydon76-lapOn 13883, it's not a regression.
20:59.24Corydon76-lapBut yes, it's a bug, so 1.6.1 and later, only
20:59.30mnicholsonok
21:01.12Corydon76-lapon 13873, I'm kind of resistant to implementing application-specific flags
21:01.47Corydon76-lapOnce we go down that road, it's never ending
21:03.23Corydon76-lapIn terms of EVENT_FLAG_CALL, there have always been a lot of events there, and we've only recently separated out some of them
21:03.36Corydon76-lapto EVENT_FLAG_DIALPLAN
21:05.44mnicholsonCorydon76-lap, yeah, really the whole event flags thing is broken
21:06.19mnicholsonbut I don't see a reason not to seperate the AGI events out
21:07.05mnicholsonthey are not specially call related events, they are agi related mostly
21:08.21mnicholsonok, if I have a bug in 1.6.1 and trunk, that was introduced in trunk, do I commit the fix to 1.6.1 and then merge to trunk or the other way around?
21:08.28Corydon76-lapIs there a better name that we can come up with that isn't "AGI" ?
21:08.32Qwellmnicholson: trunk>1.6.1
21:08.47mnicholsonQwell, that is until 1.6.1 is released right?
21:08.53Corydon76-lapCorrect
21:08.57mnicholsonok
21:09.01Qwellwell, since it's a regression, it still would
21:09.12Qwell(if it was introduced after 1.6.0)
21:09.17Corydon76-lapQwell: it's not a regression if it's introduced in trunk
21:09.27mnicholsonQwell, it was introduced into trunk, then merged to 1.6.1
21:09.50QwellCorydon76-dig: if the bug didn't exist in 1.6.0?
21:09.59mnicholsonno, no bug in 1.6.0
21:10.04mnicholsonyes, this is a regression bug
21:10.12Corydon76-lapYeah, then okay
21:10.34Corydon76-lapDepends on whether it was related to a new feature or not
21:13.23mnicholsonnope, existing feature
21:13.44Corydon76-lapYeah, regression fix, then
21:14.39mnicholsonso would I do mergetrunk6 in that case?
21:14.47Corydon76-lapCorrect
21:15.06Corydon76-lapDirectionality of fixes doesn't change
21:15.27Corydon76-lapIt's always 1.2->1.4->trunk->1.6.x
21:15.37mnicholsonoh, see that's what confused me
21:15.49mnicholsonso that always stays the same then
21:15.56Corydon76-lapCorrect
21:16.17Corydon76-lapThe question only becomes whether we do a step or not, not the directionality
21:16.37mnicholsonwe need dvcs badly
21:16.47Corydon76-lapEh?
21:17.02Corydon76-lapoh, nvm
21:18.08Corydon76-lapmnicholson: go ahead with 13873 on trunk and 1.6.1, then
21:19.25Corydon76-lapI hate it, but there doesn't seem to be anything better
21:20.30mnicholsonCorydon76-lap, ok. You may have been confused earlier, as I was talking about a different bug with the regression stuff.
21:21.55Corydon76-lapmnicholson: I'm not confused.
21:22.22mnicholsonok
21:22.29QwellM13945
21:22.30mnicholsongood
21:22.31MuffinMan[feedback] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/Subscriptions 0013945: Asterisk can't watch for more than 5 devices on a single hint reported by mdu113 (Karma: +5.50) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13945
21:22.34Corydon76-lapmnicholson: but since it's a new feature and 1.6.1 has not yet been released, it's best for the flag to be consistent across releases
21:22.37QwellCorydon76-dig: extension limit is longer in 1.6, right?
21:23.04Corydon76-lapQwell: it won't be as of 1.6.2
21:23.08mnicholsonCorydon76-lap, oh, I didn't know that has not been released yet, even better
21:23.11QwellO.o
21:23.20Corydon76-lapQwell: other than the 8192 character line limit
21:23.32Qwellit won't be longer in 1.6.2?
21:23.35Corydon76-lapmnicholson: we're only into betas of 1.6.1
21:23.58Corydon76-lapQwell: prior to 1.6.2, the limit is 256, I believe
21:24.07Qwelloh
21:24.16Corydon76-lapQwell: it's a matter of a variable substitution buffer
21:24.34Qwellso, known issue, won't fix
21:24.51Qwellrather, known limitation
21:25.08Corydon76-lapIt's an open question.  Do you think it deserves to be fixed?
21:25.12Qwellno
21:25.15lmadsenyes
21:25.21lmadsenis just being difficult
21:25.27QwellIf it will cause stack issues, no.  Definitely not.
21:25.35Qwellmaking it dynamic is a feature
21:25.55Corydon76-lapQwell: actually, in 1.6.2, it's using heap for the buffer (ast_str)
21:25.58Qwelliirc, that's what is changing, right?
21:26.25Corydon76-lapYou're right; it would cause stack issues
21:27.22Entomologist*** CLOSED (13955) [Core/FileFormatInterface] Asterisk crashes when Playback/Backround with non existing file.
21:27.22EntomologistAssigned to: mnicholson
21:27.22EntomologistReported by: chris-mac  Karma: 2.5
21:27.22Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13955
21:27.22Entomologist*********************************************************
21:27.50QwellCorydon76-dig: Do you want to take care of 13945?  You know a lot more about how that works
21:30.00Corydon76-lapSure
21:30.34mnicholsonthis svn merging stuff seems very primitive compared to what I am used to, it feels dirty
21:30.52mvanbaakmnicholson: compared to ?
21:31.01mnicholsonmonotone
21:31.09mvanbaaknever heard of :)
21:46.07lmadsenM13301
21:46.08MuffinMan[ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/General 0013301: [patch] AMI UpdateConfig -- When creating category, memory allocation failure in config.c reported by trevo (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13301
21:46.16lmadsenCorydon76-dig: how did you reproduce that issue? I can't seem to get asterisk to crash
21:46.33Corydon76-laplmadsen: not the crash, but the corrupt file
21:46.48Corydon76-laplmadsen: do exactly as he does and your iax.conf will be corrupt
21:46.57lmadsenoh! I didn't even notice that part. Looking
21:47.18lmadsenaha... I see
21:47.24lmadsenlet me patch and try again
21:47.26Corydon76-laplmadsen: it only crashes when you do it many, many, many times in a row, and eventually, Asterisk runs out of memory while loading a humongous iax.conf
21:47.35lmadsenok, that makes perfect sense now
21:47.43lmadsenissue reproduced -- testing fix now
21:56.08Entomologist*** CLOSED (13513) [Resources/res_monitor] Recording transcoded call with Monitor() uses 3 licenses of G.729
21:56.08EntomologistAssigned to: kpfleming
21:56.08EntomologistReported by: blitzrage  Karma: 35
21:56.08Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13513
21:56.08Entomologist*********************************************************
21:56.20Entomologist*** CLOSED (13873) [Core/ManagerInterface] [patch] new eventflag for agiexec-events on ami
21:56.20EntomologistAssigned to: mnicholson
21:56.20EntomologistReported by: fnordian  Karma: 9.5
21:56.20Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13873
21:56.20Entomologist*********************************************************
22:29.18*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
22:31.33lmadsenhas gotten the Ready For Testing issues down from like... 17 to 13 I think...
22:37.12*** join/#asterisk-bugs telecos (n=sergio@67.166.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es)
22:47.16lmadsenhey, just to see if I did it right... does anyone else see a filter in mantis for 'Ready For Review' ?
22:54.58seanbrightdoes
22:57.32lmadsenw00t
22:57.34lmadsenthanks
22:58.21*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir_ (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
23:02.22lmadsenM13888
23:02.24MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_h323 0013888: Cannot compile SVN with patch from bug report 11261 (H323Plus) reported by lukanr (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13888
23:02.37lmadsenok... so I can agree with this last note, but... there is no code, so this is a feature request right?
23:03.37Qwelllmadsen: I agree with your assessment
23:03.46lmadsenQwell: can you close that for me?
23:04.04lmadsenI already closed the other one, and it looks bad if I'm the only one closing those types of issues :)
23:04.13lmadsenif someone else does it, then I'm backed up ;)
23:04.20Qwellthe other did have patches..  lemme look
23:04.51lmadsen<PROTECTED>
23:05.39Qwellnot backward compat it doesn't look like
23:08.06Qwelllast release in Feb
23:09.04lmadsenya... but I looked at the CVS activity
23:09.10lmadsenthere were some commits this month
23:09.17lmadsenhttp://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=194599&ugn=h323plus&type=cvs&mode=12months
23:11.28Qwellgroans
23:12.32Corydon76-lappokes lmadsen with a transaction
23:13.01lmadsenCorydon76-dig: o.O
23:13.11jsmithCorydon76-lap: Did you see my comments re: tx support in ODBC in the -users mailing list?
23:13.20lmadsenwtf... this member of parliament has a rocker hairdo and is wearing a leather jacket
23:13.34Corydon76-lapjsmith: did you see the work I did today on transactions?
23:13.46lmadsenjsmith: there was just a commit re: tx in odbc...
23:14.08Corydon76-lapIt be about ready to test.
23:14.37Qwelllmadsen: I don't know...
23:14.50lmadsenQwell: hrmmmm
23:14.56Qwell13888 being open is wrong
23:15.07Qwell"hey, this other bug ...blah"  no, BUT
23:15.34Qwellit's a reasonable thing, especially if there are patches.  I have a few problems though
23:15.50Qwell1) It has to be backwards compat.  Nothing else is acceptable.
23:16.04Qwell2) He has to get feedback/testing.  It can't just sit open for 9 months again.
23:16.06lmadsenif anything, we could close the new bug, and re-open the other bug. But I will wait for your comments.
23:16.45jsmithCorydon76-lap: Yes, that's why I pinged you :-p
23:17.06Qwelllmadsen: that sound about right?
23:17.28lmadsenQwell: yes, I will reopen the other issue, and close the new issue, and make a note re: your requirements
23:17.34Corydon76-lapjsmith: when did you ping me?
23:17.42lmadsenthanks Qwell
23:18.12jsmithCorydon76-lap: Approximately 4 minutes ago, when I said "Did you see my comments re: tx support in ODBC..."
23:18.21Corydon76-lapjsmith: the post on the ML is what inspired me to go back and figure out what was missing
23:18.21Qwellthis is why forks are silly.
23:18.32QwellThey first thing they often do is say "ZOMFG, LET'S MURDER THE API"
23:19.58Entomologist*** CLOSED (13888) [Channels/chan_h323] Cannot compile SVN with patch from bug report 11261 (H323Plus)
23:19.58EntomologistReported by: lukanr  Karma: 0
23:19.58Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13888
23:19.58Entomologist*********************************************************
23:23.25lmadsenQwell: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13888#95449
23:23.42lmadsenGAH!
23:23.49lmadsenI just reopened the issue I closed
23:24.23Entomologist*** CLOSED (13888) [Channels/chan_h323] Cannot compile SVN with patch from bug report 11261 (H323Plus)
23:24.23EntomologistReported by: lukanr  Karma: 0
23:24.23Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13888
23:24.23Entomologist*********************************************************
23:25.26lmadsenQwell: see my comment on 11261 now if you're interested
23:35.07Qwellsaw, and commented
23:46.58mnicholsonCorydon76-lap, Qwell, do you think that Join event change should go into 1.6.1? (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13883)
23:52.09Corydon76-lapmnicholson: might as well
23:52.27mnicholsonok

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.