IRC log for #asterisk-bugs on 20090417

00:19.45*** join/#asterisk-bugs tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@bzq-179-75-202.static.bezeqint.net)
00:23.17*** join/#asterisk-bugs eliel (n=eliels@151-202-114-200.fibertel.com.ar)
02:13.33*** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
02:13.33*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
02:53.58*** join/#asterisk-bugs The_Boy_Wonder (n=davidvos@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
02:54.01*** join/#asterisk-bugs mnicholson (n=mnichols@nat/digium/x-6e0db4074b36f880) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
02:54.01*** join/#asterisk-bugs Entomologist (n=nobody@76.164.171.226) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
05:19.31*** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net)
05:19.31*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ
06:29.00*** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net)
06:29.00*** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
06:29.00*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo bbryant putnopvut] by irc.freenode.net
11:56.23*** join/#asterisk-bugs eliel (n=eliels@200.61.172.61)
12:13.29*** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim)
12:25.25*** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
12:25.25*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
12:47.28*** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
12:47.28*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
13:29.35Entomologist*** CLOSED (14615) [Core/PBX] exten => ANSWER not found when extenpatternmatchnew=yes
13:29.35EntomologistAssigned to: mmichelson
13:29.35EntomologistReported by: steinwej  Karma: 0.25
13:29.35Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14615
13:29.35Entomologist*********************************************************
14:28.19*** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982)
14:41.29Entomologist*** CLOSED (14256) [Channels/chan_sip/General] [patch] SIP Channel name is not unique
14:41.29EntomologistAssigned to: file
14:41.29EntomologistReported by: Nick_Lewis  Karma: 5.25
14:41.29Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14256
14:41.29Entomologist*********************************************************
14:48.49*** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176)
15:18.29*** join/#asterisk-bugs d1mas (n=chatzill@host-99.dataart.net)
15:20.18d1masHello. Just read a forum - ppl tying to use new fax from Digium and there are lots of complaints about application name conflict - as I understand, the new module provides ReceiveFax - exactly the same name as app_fax in the 1.6 tree. The question is - why/
15:21.48russellbit's that way on purpose, so that you can swap them in and out and use the same dialplan
15:25.25d1masrussellb: if arguments are compatible you can easily swap ReceiveFax and SomethingElse just by modifying single line of dialplan.... And this way you can use BOTH....
15:25.48russellbwhy would you want to use both?
15:28.41russellbalso, we do have a goal of writing a new module that uses spandsp that plugs in to the new res_fax architecture
15:28.44d1masrussellb: me? no particular reason. I just find it really strange making this kind of problems for people - why couldn't they have both at the same time just for testing? How is it possible to submit patches for app_fax now if these patches make parameters incompatible with Digium fax?
15:28.53russellbthat way, there will only be one app, and underneath it can use both fax engines
15:29.02d1masah...
15:29.16russellbbut, that part is still in progress ...
15:31.32d1masrussellb: anyway, I'm not sure maybe people are just not reading documents accurately or something but it seems everyone who tries to install Digium fax spends time tying to understand why it is not working and then discovers the name issue...
15:32.09d1mas(just to be on the same page - i did NOT read the installation docs because i did not try to install digium solution)
15:33.18d1mas(I just read what people are doing on forums
15:43.12Entomologist*** CLOSED (14306) [CDR/General] CDR not written when Busy() used
15:43.12EntomologistAssigned to: mnicholson
15:43.12EntomologistReported by: cristiandimache  Karma: 0
15:43.12Entomologisthttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14306
15:43.12Entomologist*********************************************************
15:51.30russellbd1mas: Thanks for the feedback
16:32.10*** join/#asterisk-bugs philippel (n=p_lindhe@pool-98-111-74-92.sttlwa.fios.verizon.net)
16:33.04philippeltzafrir_laptop ping
16:33.15tzafrir_laptopphilippel, pong
16:33.31philippeltzafrir_laptop this was your comment no?: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14739
16:33.47philippelconcerning 'won't fix' for pre 1.6?
16:38.37tzafrir_laptopphilippel, hmm.. where does the magic value 2048 come from?
16:39.00philippelnot magic, it's what was tested for the particular person's installation to get over their issue
16:39.42philippelI would suggest that at least an 'easy' fix be implemented, bumping it up to something like 4096 or so - so that the number of cases that run into issues is significanlty minimized
16:40.24philippelat the current setting, it really is an 'issue' since it means that an installation of 100 extensions (actually something more like 75) can not do a voiicemail blast group to all employees
16:41.00*** join/#asterisk-bugs xpot (n=james@70.91.210.233)
16:41.29philippelIt would also be appropriate, if such a 'kludge' was done, to detect if the passed in parameter is longer than the bufffer size and print a warning in the log as opposed to silent failure
16:41.50philippelsince I"m understanding that the proposed fix will not work pre-1.6?
16:46.05*** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak_ (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak)
16:48.50*** join/#asterisk-bugs JunK-Y (n=junky@modemcable206.69-20-96.mc.videotron.ca)
16:48.50*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o JunK-Y] by ChanServ
17:58.08*** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net)
17:58.08*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ
18:30.14BlargMaN00file: ping
18:30.23filefalls over
18:30.40BlargMaN00lol
18:30.59BlargMaN00i created that patch for the option to require audio before reinvite...  and it works...
18:31.20BlargMaN00should i create a new report for a new feature, or attach to 14850??
18:31.36filenew report is fine
18:31.40BlargMaN00cool
18:54.47BlargMaN00M14927
18:54.48MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Core/NewFeature 0014927: [patch] Create option to require audio before reinvite reported by BlargMaN (Karma: +3.50) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14927
18:55.37BlargMaN00file: ^^^^^  There you go...  check it out, and let me know what you think...
20:19.27leifmadsenM14920
20:19.28MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/TCP-TLS 0014920: Segmentation fault after almost exactly ~ 500 finished SIP over TCP calls. reported by vrban (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14920
20:19.41leifmadsenthat subject is kinda humourous
20:19.56leifmadsenI read that as, "Segfault after almost exactly approximately 500..."
20:20.05leifmadsenalmost exactly approximately...
20:21.50BlargMaN00exactly only different...
21:50.46*** join/#asterisk-bugs tfrew (n=tfrew@office.neteasyinc.com)
22:21.58*** join/#asterisk-bugs SuD (n=alex@89.140.32.2.static.user.ono.com)
22:22.40SuDhttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14631 <-- Hi, anybody want to review my bug? It's about queues and ghost calls.
22:32.48Corydon76-digSorry, you said the one word that actually made people less likely to look at your issue -- queues.  :-P j/k
22:33.03Corydon76-digM14631
22:33.05MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_queue 0014631: [patch] Ghost calls with queues and spa942 and 922 reported by latinsud (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14631

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.