| 00:27.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@c-71-228-179-90.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
| 00:27.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 00:41.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-22-114.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 00:41.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 01:17.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-22-114.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 01:17.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 02:19.47 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 02:19.47 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 06:18.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 06:26.50 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-26.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 07:41.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 08:00.26 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Hatrix (n=Hatrix@213.201.24.127.static.user.ono.com) |
| 08:02.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Hatrix (n=Hatrix@213.201.24.127.static.user.ono.com) |
| 10:16.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs itamarjp (n=itamar@189-015-69-079.xd-dynamic.ctbcnetsuper.com.br) |
| 11:28.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 11:34.25 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 11:34.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 12:32.38 | leifmadsen | morning all! |
| 12:41.13 | Marquis42 | morning leif! |
| 12:46.32 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: how goes? |
| 12:47.17 | Marquis42 | Quite well, actually. How about yourself? |
| 12:50.20 | leifmadsen | oh not too shabby -- just ramping up my virtual machine server (which had a HD crash last week) so I can get testing! :) |
| 12:52.18 | Marquis42 | Excellent, though HD crashes suck. :( |
| 12:52.57 | leifmadsen | oh ya... especially when they are supposed to be in a mirrored RAID, and the RAID stops working 4 months before the drive with all your data on it crashes |
| 12:53.05 | leifmadsen | the other 3 drives are working fine of course |
| 12:53.11 | Marquis42 | doh! |
| 12:53.26 | leifmadsen | doh indeed :) |
| 12:53.38 | leifmadsen | luckily I had somewhat of a backup of my books on another server, because that would have been twice... |
| 12:53.57 | Marquis42 | Well that's something at least. |
| 12:54.17 | leifmadsen | I have no gone out and gotten 2x 1.5TB drives and a NAS enclosure for backups, and avoided the crappy on-board RAID chip and just used the linux software raid |
| 12:54.45 | Marquis42 | That is an excellent idea. I've thankfully never before been bitten by onboard RAID, but in general I avoid it. |
| 12:54.45 | leifmadsen | and my production server is now an older HP DL360 server with hardware RAID hosted at Q9 (data centre) downtown |
| 12:54.56 | leifmadsen | ya, I learned the hard way I guess :) |
| 12:55.34 | Marquis42 | Yes, unfortunately. |
| 12:55.54 | leifmadsen | well, got lucky it only put me back about 2 days instead of a week... or more |
| 12:56.08 | Marquis42 | BTW, I committed an update to the sample config on my pubsub branch so that, you know, it might actually be useful without poring over the code to figure out what possible options exist. ;) |
| 12:56.17 | leifmadsen | I have now moved all my production images out to a colo instead of hosting them here on non-server grade hardware |
| 12:56.17 | Marquis42 | That's good. |
| 12:56.27 | leifmadsen | lol nice :) |
| 12:56.33 | leifmadsen | I'm hoping to look at it sometime today perhaps |
| 12:56.45 | leifmadsen | I have a bunch on my plate, and I wanna try and knock down some of these smaller issues assigned to me |
| 12:56.51 | leifmadsen | but I'm excited to give it a shot :) |
| 12:56.55 | Marquis42 | Cool. Whenever you have time, I know you have plenty of things on your plate. But I'll be around here if you have any questions. |
| 12:57.51 | leifmadsen | awesome -- I really do want to test it because I think it could solve some blockers for distributed queue agents |
| 12:58.04 | leifmadsen | we have AIS to solve those issues, but hopefully this will be a good WAN solution |
| 12:58.20 | Marquis42 | That's what I'm hoping for as well. |
| 12:59.46 | leifmadsen | since that's kinda what I'm talking about at astricon, I'm really excited to test and see how it works :) |
| 12:59.55 | leifmadsen | most likely will get mention in my slides |
| 13:00.00 | Marquis42 | Ah, very nice. Hopefully it will not disappoint. |
| 13:00.48 | leifmadsen | now attempts to reproduce and test this chan_vpb issue |
| 13:00.58 | Marquis42 | Good luck! :) |
| 13:01.05 | leifmadsen | thanks! |
| 13:02.00 | leifmadsen | the sooner I get these knocked off the sooner I can start building a queue cluster for testing :) |
| 13:02.15 | Marquis42 | Excellent |
| 13:02.25 | Marquis42 | Then I shall bother you no further. :) |
| 13:02.30 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 13:02.33 | leifmadsen | carry on |
| 13:27.08 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 13:27.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 13:39.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 13:39.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 13:55.06 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=nnjsmith@asterisk/training-and-documentation-guru/jsmith) |
| 13:55.06 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 14:03.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:03.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:14.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 14:14.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 14:59.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 15:09.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs wopsy (n=80475@AToulouse-754-1-1-6.w90-11.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 15:09.32 | wopsy | hi :) |
| 15:09.38 | wopsy | someone can help me ? i've a problem with asterisk and LDAP . pm pls :) |
| 15:19.35 | Qwell | wopsy: #asterisk |
| 15:21.29 | wopsy | thanks :) |
| 15:36.11 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 15:36.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:47.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176) |
| 15:48.16 | leifmadsen | Corydon76-dig: ping? |
| 15:48.20 | leifmadsen | M15623 |
| 15:48.22 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Applications/app_macro 0015623: [patch] 'h' extension never reach in a macro reported by sberney (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15623 |
| 15:48.31 | leifmadsen | should that issue be closed? |
| 15:49.25 | Corydon76-dig | leifmadsen: I'm waiting for them to resign themselves to the eventuality |
| 15:49.40 | leifmadsen | heh |
| 15:49.46 | Corydon76-dig | Once that occurs, yes, it can be closed |
| 15:49.49 | leifmadsen | ok, I'll leave it open for now |
| 15:51.08 | Corydon76-dig | If they don't respond today, I think you can close it |
| 15:51.35 | Corydon76-dig | 15765 was assigned to you, because it will result in a dot release of 1.2 |
| 15:52.04 | Corydon76-dig | and I wanted you to be cognizant before we committed it |
| 15:53.33 | leifmadsen | M15765 |
| 15:53.35 | MuffinMan | [confirmed] [Asterisk] Core/PBX 0015765: [patch] Incorrect parsing of day range in pbx.c reported by hooi (Karma: +0.25) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15765 |
| 15:53.39 | leifmadsen | ah gotcha |
| 15:53.44 | leifmadsen | cognizant? |
| 15:53.50 | leifmadsen | aware? :) |
| 15:54.06 | Corydon76-dig | aware and understanding |
| 15:55.04 | Corydon76-dig | Me talk pretty one day? |
| 15:55.06 | leifmadsen | gotcha -- well I confirmed the issue regardless :) If you could put a note in next time you assign something like that with what you want me to do with the issue, that'd help a bunch and not waste time reproducing issues that don't need it. |
| 15:55.15 | leifmadsen | some day |
| 15:55.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 15:55.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 16:15.54 | leifmadsen | file: ping? |
| 16:16.03 | file | leifmadsen: pong? |
| 16:16.33 | leifmadsen | I have a bug that I'm trying to reproduce, and it says, "Packet2Packet bridging" in the console output. I can't seem to get the Packet2Packet part up -- what am I missing? (all phones are on the same LAN) |
| 16:17.12 | file | there's nothing you should have to do to make it work |
| 16:17.31 | file | but have you looked at rtp debug to see if the packets are coming in? |
| 16:17.48 | leifmadsen | will double check -- I have a softphone in the mix, so that might be doing it |
| 16:37.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 16:37.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 16:49.57 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs generalhan (n=asd@about/windows/staff/generalhan) |
| 16:52.05 | generalhan | hey all, quick question. If a bug is submited but information was missing in the report, or some other kind of information is needed, will there be a feedback-type reply to the bug? as opposed to the devs just overlooking the bug because of incomplete data ? |
| 16:55.10 | Qwell | generalhan: usually, yes |
| 16:55.35 | Qwell | 15575 is a good example of this |
| 16:55.57 | generalhan | Qwell: perfect thank you. this was the first thing i have submitted, and wanted to be sure that i would get some type of feed back ... even if i royally screwed up my post |
| 16:57.50 | Qwell | what bug #? |
| 16:58.04 | generalhan | 15772 |
| 16:58.36 | Qwell | there's enough info there afaict. seems like there has to be some thought by a dev |
| 16:59.12 | Qwell | sort of a "what would happen if we just created the dir, if /foo didn't even exist". seems like it could be bad. dunno |
| 16:59.57 | generalhan | yea, i was kinda affraid that it might come back that way. but i had to give it a shot, since i have tried everything else to get this to work how i need it to |
| 17:02.06 | Qwell | that isn't a final determination by any means, it's just the type of question that would need to be answered by whoever looks at it. |
| 17:02.44 | generalhan | yes, i understand! i am going to get back to the drawing board on this anyway and see if i can come up with something else ... just in case it does turn out that way ! |
| 17:02.55 | generalhan | Qwell: thanks for the input |
| 17:03.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:07.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:09.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:11.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:12.27 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim) |
| 17:14.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:19.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:40.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Entomologist (n=nobody@76.164.171.226) |
| 17:45.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Victor_Yure (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 19:26.52 | Entomologist | *** CLOSED (15273) [Core/General] [patch] german time (20:01:00 oh clock) is announced wrong |
| 19:26.53 | Entomologist | Assigned to: tilghman |
| 19:26.53 | Entomologist | Reported by: Benjamin Kluck Karma: 0 |
| 19:26.54 | Entomologist | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15273 |
| 19:26.54 | Entomologist | ********************************************************* |
| 20:07.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176) |
| 21:01.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs eliel (n=eliels@200.61.172.61) |
| 22:39.53 | Entomologist | *** CLOSED (15169) [Functions/func_iconv] When building with uClibc, configure script mistakenly assumes iconv is always available |
| 22:39.53 | Entomologist | Reported by: pprindeville Karma: 4 |
| 22:39.54 | Entomologist | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15169 |
| 22:39.54 | Entomologist | ********************************************************* |
| 23:41.27 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-22-114.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 23:41.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 23:50.23 | generalhan | bah, time to get some sleep. thanks again for the help Qwell ! |