| 00:11.22 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: did you post the issue yet? |
| 00:16.54 | Marquis42 | Just finished up, yes. 16320 |
| 01:24.05 | leifmadsen | M16320 |
| 01:24.09 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/General 0016320: [patch] Incorrect reloading of realtime peer causes mailbox list to expand indefinitely reported by Marquis (Karma: +16.25) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16320 |
| 02:35.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 03:09.20 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmsteffan (n=laurent@195.221.84.4) |
| 03:12.24 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 03:12.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 03:20.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 03:20.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs xpot (n=xpot@70-91-210-233-BusName-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 03:20.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65.127.126.34) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 03:20.45 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs MuffinMan (n=muffinma@asterisk/issue-tracker-bot/muffinman) |
| 03:20.45 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ChanServ (ChanServ@services.) |
| 03:20.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo leifmadsen ChanServ] by irc.freenode.net |
| 06:23.07 | lmsteffan | I have found something that semms odd in the code but can't determine whether it's really a bug, nor its severity. I don't have the means to test it because it's a fringe case. What's the best way of proceeding : |
| 06:24.14 | lmsteffan | go ahead and open an issue on the bug tracker ? discuss it on this channel ? or on asterisk-dev ? or do anything else ? |
| 06:26.42 | Corydon76-dig | Ask on #asterisk |
| 06:26.50 | lmsteffan | The issue that I have is that a channel is apparently not released in ast_queue_frame when something (presumably not right) happens during ast_frdup |
| 06:26.58 | Corydon76-dig | First eliminate possible user issues |
| 06:27.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 06:27.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ccesario (n=ccesario@189-19-6-236.dsl.telesp.net.br) |
| 06:28.06 | lmsteffan | Er... I'm talking about C code here, and I'm ready to get into details if needed |
| 06:28.06 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mvanbaak (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 06:28.28 | Corydon76-dig | I'd wait about 10 hours, then bring it up on #asterisk-dev |
| 06:29.20 | Corydon76-dig | You're more likely to get a reasonable response if you discuss while developers are awake and alert |
| 06:29.24 | lmsteffan | oh you mean because of time lag ? |
| 06:29.42 | lmsteffan | sorry about that, I completely forgot! |
| 06:29.45 | Corydon76-dig | I mean because I'm tired and about to go to bed |
| 06:30.00 | Corydon76-dig | and the others are probably already in bed |
| 06:30.28 | Corydon76-dig | If tomorrow morning doesn't work out, keep in mind that it's the last day before an American holiday, so next Monday would be the next best shot |
| 06:31.17 | lmsteffan | ok thanks for this information, I'll try again in maybe 15 hours or so then and then next week. |
| 06:31.26 | lmsteffan | Have a good night. |
| 06:31.47 | Corydon76-dig | g'night |
| 06:54.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 07:55.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 07:56.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 09:05.14 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs sgimeno (n=sgimeno@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 09:58.51 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs sgimeno (n=sgimeno@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 10:37.06 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmsteffan (n=laurent@114.69.191.131) |
| 11:13.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 13:01.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs corretico (n=laguilar@201.201.46.106) |
| 13:45.09 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@eduroam-193-157-113-208.uio.no) |
| 13:50.24 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim) |
| 14:17.31 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 14:24.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:24.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:59.38 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor-H (n=chatzill@c-68-34-116-180.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
| 15:01.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs davidbrillert (n=aragon12@216.235.8.130) |
| 15:14.05 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fcois93 (n=Administ@bagnolet.acropolistelecom.net) |
| 15:14.24 | fcois93 | hello all |
| 15:14.33 | fcois93 | I have some problem with diversion and asterisk |
| 15:14.35 | fcois93 | if I look at the draft-levy-sip-diversion-08.txt, asterisk dont generate diversion at good time |
| 15:23.54 | putnopvut | fcois93: What version of Asterisk are you using, and when are you expecting Diversion to be generated? |
| 15:25.08 | fcois93 | I use asterisk 1.6.1. my phone generate a 302 with the new contact after the invite.I think that asterisk have to do the second invite with a diversion. no? |
| 15:25.58 | putnopvut | There's no requirement to do so. Support for sending Diversion after receiving a 302 is not in 1.6.1 |
| 15:26.11 | putnopvut | If you use Asterisk trunk, you should get the behavior you expect, though. |
| 15:36.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 15:36.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 15:44.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 15:44.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 15:46.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@212.178.82.20) |
| 15:54.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@12.187.84.162) |
| 16:04.44 | fcois93 | putnopvut: in fact, after a 302, I cant see if the call is a diversion because there are no diversion header! the simple difference beetween the two INVITE is a P-Asserted-Identity. |
| 16:04.44 | fcois93 | I can't say "If I have a P-Asserted-Identity, I have to add a diversion..."it isnt possible because P-Asserted-Identity isnt for diversion! |
| 16:04.44 | fcois93 | then, I need that asterisk add diversion header after 302 IF the user didnt add the diversion header in the 302 |
| 16:05.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor-H (n=chatzill@c-68-34-116-180.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
| 16:06.29 | putnopvut | Okay, and as I said before that functionality is not present in Asterisk 1.6.1. Not unless you change the source code. In Asterisk trunk, however, 302s will (or at least should) result in a Diversion header on the outgoing INVITE. |
| 16:08.39 | fcois93 | putnopvut: the problem is that my knowledge in C is limited |
| 16:10.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs codefreeze-lap (n=murf@72.21.67.40) |
| 16:17.07 | fcois93 | putnopvut: know you where can be the code for that? |
| 16:19.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 16:19.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 16:21.34 | putnopvut | fcois93: in Asterisk trunk, there is a function called add_diversion_header which may be a good starting point. It's in the file channels/chan_sip.c |
| 16:23.21 | fcois93 | putnopvut: it will be hard :-) |
| 16:23.36 | putnopvut | That's what she said |
| 16:24.30 | seanbright | ... |
| 16:29.17 | fcois93 | putnopvut: don't see it in chan_sip.c ! |
| 16:29.48 | putnopvut | Are you sure you're using Asterisk trunk? Check out from http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk |
| 16:31.11 | fcois93 | putnopvut: I just use the asterisk 1.6.1. I dont know the 'trunk version'?! |
| 16:32.49 | fcois93 | putnopvut: what is the difference between trunk and normal ? |
| 16:33.15 | putnopvut | The trunk is the most up-to-date development version with the latest features. It also is not as heavily tested and may have bugs. |
| 16:33.50 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 16:36.30 | fcois93 | putnopvut: can I ask to dev team to add this function ? if yes, where? |
| 16:38.33 | Corydon76-dig | It will never be in 1.6.1 |
| 16:45.53 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 16:48.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 16:48.49 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 16:55.59 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 16:58.54 | fcois93 | kamailio will be able to do it easyer |
| 17:05.38 | lmadsen | fcois93: you will probably want to read this blog: http://blogs.asterisk.org/2009/11/10/asterisk-project-update-astricon-2009/ the section about Asterisk Release Policy updates |
| 17:09.10 | fcois93 | leifmadsen: thank you, I think I need the 1.8 :-) |
| 17:09.43 | leifmadsen | we look forward to your testing and feedback when it is created :) |
| 17:12.21 | fcois93 | leifmadsen: off course yes! we need T38 and now, it isn't so good! we use SIP proxy between asterisk and T38 gateway. the proxy is the problem in fact for asterisk |
| 17:13.07 | leifmadsen | awesome, I can't wait to see some patches! |
| 17:13.31 | leifmadsen | otherwise, your patience is acknowledged |
| 17:13.43 | leifmadsen | runs off to write some more documentation |
| 17:27.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor-H (n=chatzill@c-68-34-116-180.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
| 18:02.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@85.24.86.40.generic-hostname.arrownet.dk) |
| 18:19.18 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor-H (n=chatzill@c-68-34-116-180.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
| 18:34.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@85.24.86.40.generic-hostname.arrownet.dk) |
| 19:36.18 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@212.178.82.20) |
| 19:38.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 19:57.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@85.19.87.179) |
| 20:59.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 21:00.43 | OwenL | Is there a bug marshal available? I have more information on the closed issue 14255. |
| 21:11.43 | Qwell | -EFOURDAYWEEKEND |
| 21:14.13 | mvanbaak | :) |
| 21:14.23 | mvanbaak | M14255 |
| 21:14.26 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability 0014255: Authentication seems to be broken again for SIP NOTIFY requests reported by zktech (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14255 |
| 21:14.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@85.19.87.179) |
| 21:15.38 | mvanbaak | OwenL: you want it to be reopened ? |
| 21:18.49 | OwenL | Yes please. It looks like the authorization is never called. |
| 21:21.09 | mvanbaak | k, hang on |
| 21:21.50 | mvanbaak | done |
| 21:22.12 | OwenL | Thanks! |
| 21:22.47 | mvanbaak | you're welcome |
| 21:34.42 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs OwenL (n=owen@c-98-236-190-29.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 21:36.25 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 22:11.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@0x4dd624b2.adsl.cybercity.dk) |
| 22:15.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmsteffan (n=laurent@reef.ac-noumea.nc) |