| 06:49.51 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 08:02.00 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs corretico (n=laguilar@201.201.46.106) |
| 08:05.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs corretico (n=laguilar@201.201.46.106) |
| 08:12.31 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 11:22.39 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:19.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ccesario (n=ccesario@189-19-6-236.dsl.telesp.net.br) |
| 15:20.08 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 15:20.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:21.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs DocAwesome (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 15:21.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o DocAwesome] by ChanServ |
| 15:28.47 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 15:28.47 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 15:31.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs xpot (n=xpot@70-91-210-233-BusName-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 15:41.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs davidbrillert (n=aragon12@h216-235-8-130.host.egate.net) |
| 15:43.02 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 15:49.55 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 15:52.36 | TheDavidFactor | leifmadsen, ping |
| 15:53.10 | leifmadsen | TheDavidFactor: pong |
| 15:53.17 | TheDavidFactor | Hello sir |
| 15:53.57 | TheDavidFactor | did you see the recent email on -dev about reopening a closed issue? |
| 15:55.51 | leifmadsen | I have not, but I can look now |
| 15:55.56 | leifmadsen | I hadn't got as far as the mailing list |
| 15:56.41 | leifmadsen | which thread is it? |
| 15:56.52 | leifmadsen | found it |
| 15:56.56 | leifmadsen | just didn't scroll down far enough |
| 15:57.05 | seanbright | he claims to have a patch |
| 15:57.09 | TheDavidFactor | well, I can reopen an issue and I like to be helpful, but the poster says he's got a patch to add. The issue was closed with commits, should it be reopened? |
| 15:57.14 | seanbright | but it doesn't require a patch |
| 15:57.52 | jsmith | What's wrong with giving them the benefit of the doubt, and re-opening? |
| 15:58.21 | seanbright | nothing i guess |
| 15:58.25 | TheDavidFactor | well, since it was closed with a commit would it be better to open a new issue with his patch? |
| 15:58.28 | leifmadsen | already reopened |
| 15:58.30 | seanbright | but a patch for something that isn't a bug is a bit strange |
| 15:58.42 | leifmadsen | we'll let him submit it then close it :) |
| 15:58.52 | leifmadsen | debate closed |
| 15:59.16 | leifmadsen | perhaps his patch adds new functionality |
| 15:59.30 | seanbright | then it doesn't apply to 15820 |
| 15:59.36 | seanbright | it should be a nice issue. |
| 15:59.37 | leifmadsen | well, we'll see what happens |
| 15:59.38 | seanbright | but... |
| 15:59.40 | seanbright | debate closed |
| 16:00.18 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-lap (n=Corydon7@nat/digium/x-hzcrpatuouavmhag) |
| 16:00.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 16:04.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor (n=chatzill@fw1.safedataisp.net) |
| 16:38.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs The_Boy_Wonder (n=davidvos@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 17:25.11 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@0x4dd624b2.adsl.cybercity.dk) |
| 18:01.15 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 18:41.55 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-20.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 19:22.46 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ebroad (n=EB@72.11.213.195) |
| 19:24.32 | ebroad | leifmadsen, ping |
| 19:24.42 | leifmadsen | ebroad: pong! haven't seen around in a bit |
| 19:24.48 | leifmadsen | seen you* |
| 19:24.57 | ebroad | yea, i just bought a house |
| 19:25.08 | ebroad | so ive been busy with all that house jazz\ |
| 19:25.16 | ebroad | appliances, cabling etc |
| 19:25.30 | ebroad | i finally got some extension on my * box over the holiday |
| 19:25.41 | leifmadsen | ah yes, I know how that is |
| 19:25.59 | ebroad | yup, and being an incurable DIYer doesnt make it any easier |
| 19:26.07 | leifmadsen | heh, don't ya know it |
| 19:26.41 | ebroad | got a question about 1.6.1.9 |
| 19:27.34 | ebroad | someone reopened a ticket regarding the patch that file committed sometime back which resolved issues with tcp |
| 19:27.44 | ebroad | M16049 |
| 19:27.46 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability 0016049: [patch] Call fails to go through starting with build 1.6.0.14 reported by parisioa (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16049 |
| 19:27.56 | ebroad | the patch was included in 1.6.1.10 |
| 19:28.02 | ebroad | but not in 1.6.1.9 |
| 19:28.17 | ebroad | curious as to why(and i need to respond and close it out) |
| 19:29.27 | leifmadsen | because 1.6.1.9 was a security release |
| 19:29.35 | ebroad | doh, i just read the changelog |
| 19:29.43 | ebroad | that explains it |
| 19:29.49 | leifmadsen | 1.6.1.10 was the first bug fix release in quite some time, since 1.6.1.6 I think |
| 19:32.01 | ebroad | cool |
| 19:32.21 | leifmadsen | closed |
| 19:32.39 | ebroad | yup, just closed it out |
| 19:32.50 | leifmadsen | so did I :) |
| 19:32.55 | leifmadsen | even better, heh |
| 19:33.07 | leifmadsen | your note was slightly nicer than mine |
| 19:33.35 | ebroad | eh |
| 19:33.38 | ebroad | it all works |
| 19:34.04 | ebroad | now that monday morning is gone |
| 19:34.29 | ebroad | i got some time to work on 16238 |
| 19:35.04 | leifmadsen | nice |
| 19:35.10 | leifmadsen | that is a good one to get fixed |
| 19:35.14 | ebroad | yup |
| 19:35.27 | ebroad | the question is, who and what broke sdp version parsing |
| 19:35.29 | leifmadsen | M16238 |
| 19:35.31 | leifmadsen | indeed |
| 19:35.32 | MuffinMan | [confirmed] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/General 0016238: sip calls drop because of BYE's reported by seandarcy (Karma: +2.00) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16238 |
| 19:35.51 | leifmadsen | would that happen to be in the last line of an SDP header? |
| 19:35.53 | seanbright | ran into that this week with 1.6.1 svn |
| 19:35.58 | leifmadsen | M16268 |
| 19:36.01 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/General 0016268: [patch] Last line of SDP is not being parsed reported by sgimeno (Karma: +3.00) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16268 |
| 19:36.03 | leifmadsen | it's not that issue is it? |
| 19:36.15 | ebroad | that was 1.4 i believe |
| 19:36.38 | leifmadsen | all versions |
| 19:36.54 | leifmadsen | including 1.4 (for the closed issue) |
| 19:36.59 | ebroad | ah |
| 19:37.05 | ebroad | it was committed to all indeed |
| 19:37.20 | leifmadsen | I'm curious if that issue still exists in the latest SVN |
| 19:37.25 | seanbright | i can test |
| 19:37.27 | ebroad | that was committed 11/23 |
| 19:37.40 | ebroad | 16238 was posted 11/12 |
| 19:37.41 | leifmadsen | seanbright: that's be hawt |
| 19:38.00 | leifmadsen | so that seems about right then |
| 19:39.08 | ebroad | i don't see how that broke it |
| 19:39.21 | ebroad | lets see what was committed around then |
| 19:39.22 | leifmadsen | ok, they are just both SDP, so they may be totally unrelated |
| 19:39.31 | seanbright | hmmm |
| 19:39.40 | seanbright | the refression fix went into the tags |
| 19:39.43 | seanbright | not the branches |
| 19:39.48 | leifmadsen | it went into both |
| 19:40.02 | seanbright | the_boy_wonder's commits today did not |
| 19:40.04 | leifmadsen | scroll up some more |
| 19:40.12 | leifmadsen | no, kpfleming commits were branches |
| 19:40.15 | seanbright | right |
| 19:40.20 | leifmadsen | boy wonder is the same commit to the tags |
| 19:40.21 | seanbright | i've already tested with those commits |
| 19:40.28 | seanbright | and it's still dead |
| 19:40.34 | leifmadsen | ok, then separate issue |
| 19:40.42 | seanbright | (still requires the ignoresdpversion option) |
| 19:40.56 | leifmadsen | ok, then that needs to be resolved too |
| 19:41.06 | leifmadsen | russellb: ping? |
| 19:51.19 | ebroad | i suspect r227759 |
| 19:51.31 | seanbright | asterisk commit 227759 |
| 19:51.36 | seanbright | commit asterisk 227759 |
| 19:51.39 | MuffinMan | [227759] Committed by mnicholson on 2009-11-04T20:13:50.075391Z: Modify the SDP parsing code to parse session and media level items separately. |
| 19:51.39 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 19:51.40 | MuffinMan | ..With the new code, media level proprieties should no longer be confused with session level proprieties. This change also reorganizes some of the SDP parsing code which should make it easier to manage in the future. |
| 19:51.40 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 19:51.41 | MuffinMan | ..(closes issue #14994) |
| 19:51.44 | MuffinMan | ..Reported by: frawd |
| 19:51.46 | MuffinMan | ..Tested by: frawd, mnicholson, file |
| 19:51.49 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 19:51.51 | ebroad | ill let you know as soon as i am done compiling |
| 19:51.51 | MuffinMan | ..Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/414/ |
| 19:51.53 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 19:51.56 | MuffinMan | .. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=227759 |
| 19:57.18 | ebroad | jackpot |
| 20:01.48 | ebroad | 227758 works |
| 20:01.55 | ebroad | 227759 is broken |
| 20:04.11 | leifmadsen | nice |
| 20:11.15 | leifmadsen | seanbright: you tried latest SVN right? |
| 20:12.33 | seanbright | tried 1.6.1 a couple days ago |
| 20:12.41 | seanbright | after the latest chan_sip commits |
| 20:12.44 | leifmadsen | oh, I thought you updated today |
| 20:13.04 | seanbright | i did, but i just got main/rtp.c and app_queue.c |
| 20:13.12 | seanbright | not related to the sdp issue |
| 20:13.47 | leifmadsen | hmmm, beyond Revision: 230879 right? |
| 20:13.49 | leifmadsen | ebroad: you too? |
| 20:14.21 | ebroad | leifmadsen, 2 days ago |
| 20:14.31 | ebroad | i reverted back to 237758 |
| 20:14.32 | ebroad | works fine |
| 20:14.37 | ebroad | 237759 doesnt |
| 20:14.58 | ebroad | looks like mnicholsons changes to sdp parsing |
| 20:16.21 | ebroad | i testing with viatalk |
| 20:16.59 | ebroad | and they aren't bumping the sdp version when responding with 183 session progress or 200 ok after the line picks up |
| 20:19.14 | file | I'm not getting a call drop, but I am getting no audio if I force that scenario |
| 20:20.50 | file | ah. |
| 20:21.06 | file | pokes at it some more |
| 20:21.15 | ebroad | the question is |
| 20:21.30 | ebroad | should they be bumping the sdp version |
| 20:23.58 | file | doesn't matter right now, that causes the problem but it's not the problem |
| 20:24.19 | file | the real problem is that the sdp version check is treated as a truly fatal error |
| 20:24.31 | leifmadsen | truly fatal error? sounds bad. |
| 20:24.42 | file | equivalent to chan_sip received a malformed SDP |
| 20:24.52 | file | means the code doesn't send an ACK |
| 20:24.57 | file | I think. |
| 20:28.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs lmsteffan (n=laurent@reef.ac-noumea.nc) |
| 20:33.11 | file | was correct |
| 20:36.25 | leifmadsen | is there g722 transcoding in asterisk? |
| 20:36.35 | seanbright | yes |
| 20:36.38 | leifmadsen | hmmm ok |
| 20:36.43 | leifmadsen | M16326 |
| 20:36.46 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Codecs/codec_g722 0016326: Siemens S685IP g722 gets not translated reported by himbeere (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16326 |
| 20:36.47 | russellb | only in 1.6 |
| 20:36.53 | jsmith | leifmadsen: How can you not know that? |
| 20:36.56 | jsmith | taunts leifmadsen |
| 20:37.04 | leifmadsen | kicks jsmith in the shins |
| 20:37.15 | leifmadsen | oh nevermind |
| 20:37.20 | leifmadsen | I think that is a dupe of 16238 |
| 20:37.41 | file | it's not. |
| 20:37.55 | leifmadsen | oh? |
| 20:38.02 | leifmadsen | oops then :) |
| 20:41.59 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs davidbrillert (n=aragon12@h216-235-8-130.host.egate.net) |
| 20:42.15 | davidbrillert | russellb here? |
| 20:42.56 | davidbrillert | m16354: Segfault in ast_frdup (crash in ast_frisolate) |
| 20:43.02 | russellb | M16354 |
| 20:43.05 | davidbrillert | sorry russel :( |
| 20:43.05 | MuffinMan | [acknowledged] [Asterisk] Core/Channels 0016354: Segfault in ast_frdup reported by aragon (Karma: +4.25) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16354 |
| 20:43.12 | davidbrillert | yup |
| 20:43.59 | russellb | that crash makes me very sad. |
| 20:44.07 | davidbrillert | me too lol |
| 20:44.37 | russellb | some of the debug info seems to be missing from the bt |
| 20:44.45 | russellb | might be missing DONT_OPTIMIZE |
| 20:44.54 | davidbrillert | nope |
| 20:45.29 | leifmadsen | corrupted memory? |
| 20:45.55 | davidbrillert | Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault so I assume no |
| 20:46.03 | leifmadsen | makes random statements sometimes |
| 20:46.07 | davidbrillert | but i'm no expert |
| 20:46.11 | davidbrillert | ;) |
| 20:46.25 | russellb | however, this is different than the previous MOH crashes |
| 20:46.39 | russellb | I wish I knew where in ast_frdup() it died |
| 20:46.50 | russellb | without that, I can't do much. |
| 20:47.52 | davidbrillert | valgrind? |
| 20:51.32 | davidbrillert | i'll bet this is still related to m15609 |
| 20:52.33 | davidbrillert | introduced by r200991 |
| 20:52.33 | davidbrillert | https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/175/ |
| 20:52.33 | lmsteffan | I have just submitted a bug report with a patch, and |
| 20:52.57 | lmsteffan | M16355 |
| 20:53.02 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/PBX 0016355: [patch] Hints do not have the correct state on initialization reported by lmsteffan (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16355 |
| 20:54.17 | leifmadsen | lmsteffan: yes you have :) |
| 20:54.32 | leifmadsen | and I have set it to Ready for Testing |
| 20:54.33 | lmsteffan | and I categorized it as Core/PBX for lack of a better idea. Actually, it has to to with the event handling system and more specifically with te comparison function between two events. |
| 20:54.45 | leifmadsen | hmmm, let me see if I can find a better category |
| 20:54.51 | leifmadsen | that may be fine though |
| 20:56.15 | leifmadsen | only thing I can think of that might be more appropriate would be Channels/chan_sip/Subscriptions |
| 20:58.09 | ebroad | file, ping |
| 20:58.16 | file | pong |
| 20:58.44 | ebroad | it looks like we ACK the ok |
| 20:58.50 | ebroad | but then * sends a bye |
| 20:58.55 | file | I put a fix in SVN already |
| 20:59.44 | ebroad | i see |
| 21:00.03 | file | is fast like that |
| 21:02.22 | Corydon76-lap | Fast File System |
| 21:18.04 | lmsteffan | leifmadsen:actually it's only about hints, and occurs regardless of whether there any subscriptions. If the event subsystem can be considered part of Core/PBX then let's keep the category as is. |
| 21:18.45 | leifmadsen | lmsteffan: no problem, I left it as was |
| 21:41.53 | philipp64 | can someone re-close 15729? I wanted to add a note to it which required re-opening it. |
| 21:48.34 | leifmadsen | M15729 |
| 21:48.36 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Applications/app_voicemail/IMAP 0015729: IMAP greetings not stored in dovecot reported by lmadsen (Karma: +39.25) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15729 |
| 21:48.48 | leifmadsen | already closed |
| 23:14.58 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |