| 00:37.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs xpot (n=xpot@70-91-210-233-BusName-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 00:52.06 | Entomologist | *** CLOSED (16440) [Channels/chan_dahdi] Setting a call-forward on an analog phone results in the analog phone still being rung when dialed |
| 00:52.06 | Entomologist | Reported by: mmichelson Karma: 56.75 |
| 00:52.07 | Entomologist | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16440 |
| 00:52.07 | Entomologist | ********************************************************* |
| 02:59.48 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs correcaminos (n=laguilar@189.231.85.10) |
| 04:18.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Spiegel (n=spike@ip-166-187.interbild.net) |
| 06:54.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-21.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 08:16.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs corruptor (n=corrupto@85.94.32.98) |
| 08:17.45 | corruptor | hello. Can any1 talk about my crashes. Bug #16452 |
| 08:56.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 09:19.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Qwell (i=north@pdpc/sponsor/digium/Qwell) |
| 09:19.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Qwell] by ChanServ |
| 09:19.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 09:19.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o file] by ChanServ |
| 09:21.02 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs sgimeno (n=sgimeno@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 09:24.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs xpot (n=xpot@70-91-210-233-BusName-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 09:24.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russellb@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 09:24.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 11:10.56 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 13:05.43 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:05.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 13:33.42 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@71.228.179.90) |
| 13:33.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 14:00.51 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Marquis42 (n=bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 14:04.58 | leifmadsen | M16459 |
| 14:05.01 | MuffinMan | [ready for review] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/General 0016459: [patch] Change in sip show channels display format allowing more digits for CID reported by Rzadzins (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16459 |
| 14:05.10 | leifmadsen | can anyone think of a reason why expanding that would be "a bad thing" ? |
| 14:05.50 | leifmadsen | I'm just trying to think of existing applications that may expect the data to be 10 digits long? But if they are using that output into a script, then I'd suspect it'd be based on the tabs, not the field length |
| 14:07.29 | Marquis42 | I can't think of a good reason, and if somebody has a script that expects 10 digits then odds are quite good they are only using 10 or fewer anyway. |
| 14:08.14 | file | it just goes on and on my friend... |
| 14:10.54 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor (n=chatzill@fw1.safedataisp.net) |
| 14:12.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor (n=chatzill@fw1.safedataisp.net) |
| 14:12.35 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: ya, that's what I thought too |
| 14:12.52 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: now the question is -- is that new functionality, or a tweak that can be backported? |
| 14:27.43 | Marquis42 | leifmadsen: I would actually consider it a bug that it doesn't display the whole CID if it's over 10 digits, but that's me. |
| 14:28.06 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: ya... but just setting it to some arbitrary number doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me :) |
| 14:28.17 | leifmadsen | what happen when someone wants it 20 digits, or 35 digits? :) |
| 14:28.56 | mvanbaak | set it to AST_MAX_EXTENSION |
| 14:29.17 | mvanbaak | oh wait, it's the output |
| 14:30.11 | leifmadsen | aye |
| 14:30.18 | leifmadsen | and creating a configuration option seems silly |
| 14:30.25 | mvanbaak | it is |
| 14:30.45 | leifmadsen | I guess I'd rather see it as 16 digits for not other reason than it divides by many numbers :) |
| 14:30.59 | Marquis42 | haha |
| 14:31.02 | mvanbaak | whehehe |
| 14:31.30 | Marquis42 | Yeah, to be fair I didn't actually look at the patch itself to see how it was changed. I just think that limiting it to 10 is dumb. :) |
| 14:31.35 | leifmadsen | Marquis42: he just changed 10 to 15 |
| 14:31.48 | leifmadsen | I can agree it should probably be longer |
| 14:31.49 | Marquis42 | That's probably not the best approach. |
| 14:32.18 | mvanbaak | grab them all, find the longest, and set it to strlen of that one |
| 14:32.27 | leifmadsen | ya, I'm thinking it should be something dynamic |
| 14:32.32 | leifmadsen | I like that approach best |
| 14:57.23 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-21.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 15:28.10 | corruptor | hello. Can any1 talk about my crashes? Bug https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16452 |
| 15:35.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 15:35.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 15:38.44 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs |Cybex| (n=John@atwork-21.r-212.178.82.atwork.nl) |
| 15:44.40 | Entomologist | *** CLOSED (16453) [Applications/app_voicemail/ODBC] the value of odbcstorage is not taken into account |
| 15:44.41 | Entomologist | Reported by: ced Karma: 0 |
| 15:44.41 | Entomologist | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16453 |
| 15:44.41 | Entomologist | ********************************************************* |
| 15:52.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 15:52.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:55.25 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 15:57.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Victor_Yure (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 16:06.40 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 16:20.00 | leifmadsen | don't we already have a method of writing to a file? |
| 16:20.03 | leifmadsen | (from the dialplan |
| 16:20.03 | leifmadsen | ) |
| 16:20.22 | leifmadsen | M16461 |
| 16:20.24 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Functions/NewFeature 0016461: [patch] for reading and writing to text file reported by skyman (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16461 |
| 16:20.28 | mvanbaak | Exec('echo "foo" > bar.txt'); |
| 16:20.59 | leifmadsen | heh, that too :) |
| 16:21.07 | leifmadsen | although I think you forgot SHELL() |
| 16:21.34 | mvanbaak | yeah, but you get what I mean |
| 16:22.00 | leifmadsen | ya :) |
| 16:22.14 | leifmadsen | I'm just curious how much it makes sense to add the same functionality to the ENV() function |
| 16:22.26 | leifmadsen | it does seem to make sense in order to keep all that functionality in a single location |
| 16:22.45 | mvanbaak | ENV is for more then reading/writing to the enviroment vars ? |
| 16:23.00 | leifmadsen | well, I didn't think so... |
| 16:24.15 | mvanbaak | I think it should go into FILE() |
| 16:24.28 | file | meep |
| 16:24.36 | mvanbaak | hey file |
| 16:25.02 | leifmadsen | mvanbaak: agreed |
| 16:25.08 | leifmadsen | FILE() seems like a good place for it |
| 16:25.16 | leifmadsen | I don't see why else you wouldn't use FILE() |
| 16:25.25 | leifmadsen | since FILE() is so much more logical than ENV() |
| 16:25.30 | leifmadsen | file: oh hi! :) |
| 16:25.32 | mvanbaak | exactly |
| 16:25.51 | mvanbaak | this has nothing to do with the enviroment. It's all file operations |
| 16:25.56 | leifmadsen | agreed |
| 16:26.01 | leifmadsen | comments forthcoming! |
| 16:26.21 | mvanbaak | hurray \o/ I contribute again |
| 16:27.50 | leifmadsen | mvanbaak: oh -- func_env.c contains the FILE() function |
| 16:27.54 | leifmadsen | it's likely that's where it is |
| 16:27.58 | leifmadsen | (I can't see the code yet) |
| 16:28.08 | mvanbaak | me neither. That would make sense indeed |
| 16:28.19 | leifmadsen | ok, lets assume he put it into the FILE() function :) |
| 16:28.27 | mvanbaak | yes |
| 16:30.07 | mvanbaak | we should move that stuff into func_file.c |
| 17:10.40 | Corydon76-dig | mvanbaak: why? |
| 17:17.55 | Entomologist | *** CLOSED (16113) [General] [patch] Auto-fallthrough when attempting to enter DTMF using Background() in a Macro() |
| 17:17.56 | Entomologist | Assigned to: tilghman |
| 17:17.56 | Entomologist | Reported by: OrNix Karma: 0 |
| 17:17.57 | Entomologist | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16113 |
| 17:17.57 | Entomologist | ********************************************************* |
| 17:22.09 | mvanbaak | because it has nothing to do wit ENV |
| 17:35.30 | Corydon76-dig | Everything external to Asterisk is the environment. Hence, files unrelated to Asterisk are environmental |
| 17:36.10 | Corydon76-dig | There's your relation (and incidentally, the exact reason why I put FILE() there) |
| 17:36.41 | seanbright | eh |
| 17:37.11 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: does it surprise you to learn that I wrote FILE() ? |
| 17:38.23 | seanbright | it does not |
| 17:39.25 | Corydon76-dig | Would it surprise you to learn that I wrote the Kama Sutra? |
| 17:40.30 | leifmadsen | not really |
| 17:40.53 | Corydon76-dig | It would surprise me, actually |
| 17:59.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs ebroad (n=EB@72.11.213.195) |
| 18:00.21 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 18:55.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs miguel3239 (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 19:14.32 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs guax (n=guaxinim@unaffiliated/guaxinim) |
| 19:43.20 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 19:58.22 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs mpe (n=mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 21:01.50 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs TheDavidFactor-H (n=thedavid@nc-71-0-16-133.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |