| 00:10.49 | mvanbaak | I'm off |
| 00:10.51 | mvanbaak | latero all |
| 00:28.26 | seanbright | well that... sucks |
| 00:28.44 | russellb | seanbright: :( |
| 00:28.47 | russellb | sorry :( |
| 00:28.51 | seanbright | ain't no thang |
| 00:45.12 | seanbright | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2005-12/msg00182.html |
| 00:46.29 | russellb | interesting ... |
| 00:46.42 | seanbright | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2005-12/msg00174.html\ |
| 00:47.05 | seanbright | that one is the money shot |
| 00:47.12 | seanbright | "For most if not all targets these trampolines are created on the |
| 00:47.13 | seanbright | stack, and thus require the stack to be executable." |
| 00:47.20 | russellb | nods |
| 00:47.29 | russellb | pretty much the nail in the coffin or whatever |
| 00:47.31 | seanbright | stupid programming |
| 00:47.44 | seanbright | no with C++... |
| 00:47.45 | seanbright | heh |
| 00:47.48 | seanbright | err, now* |
| 00:49.16 | seanbright | so the real question... do i just revert my patch from earlier that changed directed pickup/features/etc or do i modify to use run-o-the-mill functions? |
| 00:49.31 | russellb | i swear, every time i accidentally leave my phone on silent, that's when i miss like 10 messages |
| 00:49.32 | russellb | :( |
| 00:49.36 | seanbright | heh |
| 00:49.49 | codefreeze-lap | I see a message "-- Got SIP response 482 "Loop Detected" back from 111.11.1.11" followed by " -- Now forwarding SIP/222.22.2.22-b854ae80 to 'Local/18864680680@inbound' (thanks to SIP/111.11.1.11-1e8967d0)" .... and because of it, the chaninfo func isn't working.... what is happening? anybody know? |
| 00:49.50 | codefreeze-lap | " |
| 00:50.11 | russellb | chaninfo func? |
| 00:51.29 | codefreeze-lap | russellb: oops, sipchaninfo, as in " chan_sip.c:12072 function_sipchaninfo_read: This function can only be used on SIP channels." |
| 00:53.12 | russellb | so i guess ... you're using it on a local channel? |
| 00:53.45 | codefreeze-lap | yes, the question I guess is "why"... |
| 00:54.31 | snuff-work | because it was from a 302? |
| 00:54.31 | codefreeze-lap | the remote end is saying "Loop detected", and in response, we fire up a local channel....? |
| 00:54.32 | file | blinks |
| 00:54.55 | russellb | I'm ... not sure |
| 00:55.01 | russellb | i'd have to see your config, sip trace, etc. .. |
| 00:55.03 | russellb | and i'm about to leave |
| 01:00.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (n=me@c-67-188-204-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 01:00.47 | *** part/#asterisk-dev russellb (n=russellb@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 01:36.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 01:36.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 01:42.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@ip68-3-60-66.ph.ph.cox.net) |
| 01:48.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.165.55) |
| 01:54.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=dwayne@76.29.245.9) |
| 01:54.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 02:01.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev russellb (n=russell@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 02:01.47 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 02:34.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sasargen (n=chatzill@173.4.162.163) |
| 02:41.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jfarrell (n=jfarrell@unaffiliated/jfarrell) |
| 02:41.16 | jfarrell | hello |
| 02:41.24 | jfarrell | got a quick question for some of the gurus out there; |
| 02:41.47 | jfarrell | we have a prospective client who is looking to create something similiar to TrixBox and HUD for their organization |
| 02:42.20 | jfarrell | they have contracted us, though we are a .NET shop. We want to do the work for them, however, I am having difficulty ascertaining development options for Windows based systems |
| 02:42.23 | jfarrell | are there any? :) |
| 02:43.51 | snuff-work | jfarrell: best to ask in #asterisk |
| 02:44.01 | jfarrell | ahh then i shall |
| 03:13.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev steliosk (n=Stelios@ipa107.2.tellas.gr) |
| 03:17.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev codefreeze-lap (n=murf@72.21.67.40) |
| 03:17.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o codefreeze-lap] by ChanServ |
| 03:54.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64 (n=chatzill@63.224.43.239) |
| 04:28.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=arodgers@S010600095b33697f.vc.shawcable.net) |
| 04:32.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@202.56.7.181) |
| 04:43.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sasargen (n=chatzill@173-4-162-163.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 04:48.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:48.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 04:58.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev smurf (n=smurf@debian/developer/smurf) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 05:49.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _charly_ (i=kroseneg@sunrise.schmidham.net) |
| 05:50.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@202.56.7.181) |
| 06:59.25 | philipp64 | Qwell: ping |
| 06:59.45 | philipp64 | oej: you about? |
| 07:09.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 07:09.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by ChanServ |
| 07:11.10 | oej | philipp64: Good morning! |
| 07:12.46 | mvanbaak | good mornin oej |
| 07:13.03 | oej | Morning! |
| 07:20.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev steliosk (n=Stelios@ipa107.2.tellas.gr) |
| 07:21.09 | philipp64 | oej: morning. |
| 07:21.31 | philipp64 | has there been any discussion on the nat/conntrack issue? |
| 07:21.54 | philipp64 | I wanted to add a note to the bug, but it was closed as resolved... and I think only bug marshals can update closed bugs, no? |
| 07:22.19 | philipp64 | (sorry, I'm more adept with bugzilla than mantis.) |
| 07:22.41 | philipp64 | anyway, I wanted to ask that if there's an email thread discussing the bug, to copy me on it... |
| 07:22.49 | philipp64 | since I might be writing the code... :-) |
| 07:24.44 | philipp64 | oej: or good night. should be going to sleep soon. |
| 07:25.37 | oej | Well, Russell decided to close it. Start a new thread on asterisk-dev to discuss it and read John's document. |
| 07:25.53 | philipp64 | I'm not on asterisk-dev. |
| 07:26.02 | philipp64 | can anyone subscribe? |
| 07:29.06 | philipp64 | hmmm... guess so. |
| 07:29.17 | philipp64 | I thought it was a closed list. not sure where I got that impression. |
| 07:29.27 | philipp64 | must be thinking of kernel-dev. |
| 07:38.51 | oej | we're wide open :-) |
| 07:39.31 | oej | There is a closed list for bug-marshals, but hardly ever used |
| 07:42.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=arodgers@S010600095b33697f.vc.shawcable.net) |
| 07:42.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:42.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 08:18.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (i=vanbaak@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 08:18.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by ChanServ |
| 08:33.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 08:33.39 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 09:00.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev IsUp (n=nocturne@unaffiliated/isup) |
| 09:43.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dr-Linux|home (n=Nothing@119.63.130.34) |
| 09:44.19 | Dr-Linux|home | there is bug in app_queue.so, AddQueueMember/dynamic queue doesn't support wrapuptime |
| 10:04.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _ys (i=yuri@91.151.196.254) |
| 10:32.28 | snuff-home | mmmm.. |
| 11:06.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (n=eliel@200.61.172.61) |
| 11:06.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 11:20.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:19.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.170.194) |
| 12:26.15 | eliel | we missed http://bugs.digium.com/svnstats in the migration :-( |
| 12:29.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (n=ugelt@reserved-225136.rol.raiffeisen.net) |
| 12:52.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sasargen (n=chatzill@68-245-128-23.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 13:02.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:02.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 13:07.13 | *** part/#asterisk-dev DarKnesS_WolF (n=sherif@unaffiliated/sherif) |
| 13:20.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev shido6 (n=shido6@209.114.208.111) |
| 13:22.44 | lmadsen | morning all |
| 13:33.15 | oej | Morning! |
| 13:42.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jsmith (n=njsmith@72.21.36.138) |
| 13:42.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 14:01.39 | lmadsen | kpfleming: when bugs got moved over to the new server, something changed in that bug reports now come from noreply@digium.com instead of noreply@bugs.digium.com |
| 14:01.52 | lmadsen | (which inadvertently broke my mail filter) |
| 14:01.56 | lmadsen | fyi |
| 14:13.02 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=dwayne@76.29.245.9) |
| 14:16.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ctooley (n=ctooley@174-153-162-87.area2.spcsdns.net) |
| 14:16.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o ctooley] by ChanServ |
| 14:50.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wwalker (n=wwalker@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/wwalker) |
| 15:08.37 | tzafrir_laptop | The sample indications.conf tells that the countries should be sorted alphabetically |
| 15:08.45 | tzafrir_laptop | Where is this actually used? |
| 15:09.11 | jsmith | My best guess is that they should be sorted alphabetically just to keep the sys-admins happy |
| 15:09.20 | jsmith | I don't know that there's a technical reason to do so |
| 15:11.42 | tzafrir_laptop | This sorting is the only thing that prevents me from moving the bulk of this file to somewhere under /var/lib/asterisk |
| 15:11.58 | tzafrir_laptop | it's mostly data |
| 15:15.47 | seanbright | nothing i am seeing in res/res_indications.c or main/indications.c seem to rely on it being sorted. |
| 15:20.13 | seanbright | i am however seeing open coded linked lists |
| 15:20.17 | seanbright | for whatever reason. |
| 15:22.13 | jsmith | Sounds like another janitor project |
| 15:22.31 | seanbright | meh. if it ain't broke... |
| 15:22.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@dsl093-157-131.phx1.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
| 15:23.02 | file | they have already been changed in higher versions |
| 15:23.07 | tzafrir_laptop | seanbright, the really interesting thing is: can libtonezone be used elsewhere besides chan_dahdi? |
| 15:23.14 | seanbright | file: not in trunk |
| 15:23.29 | seanbright | tzafrir_laptop: dunno |
| 15:24.09 | tzafrir_laptop | Because we have duplicate tonezones information in dahdi-tools:zapnedata.c and indications.conf |
| 15:29.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 15:29.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 15:29.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 15:29.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 15:35.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:46.35 | codefreeze-lap | wonders where the cool "annotated" view of the source went to in the ViewVC stuff on svn.digium.com....! |
| 15:48.10 | file | codefreeze-lap: an email went out to the dev list awhile ago about that :P |
| 15:48.24 | seanbright | search engine spider + annotate = server death |
| 15:50.13 | codefreeze-lap | file: Don't use it much, but it sure can be handy !!! |
| 15:50.57 | file | and by awhile I mean weeks |
| 15:51.31 | seanbright | codefreeze-lap: you can do the ol' "svn blame [file ...]" thing |
| 15:56.14 | seanbright | blames file all the time |
| 15:56.41 | file | seanbright: <3 |
| 15:56.47 | seanbright | :) |
| 15:57.18 | tzafrir_laptop | praises file |
| 15:57.39 | tzafrir_laptop | annotates seanbright |
| 16:08.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (n=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-f7f48e86c9c89fef) |
| 16:08.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 16:10.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (n=sruffell@adsl-074-185-078-025.sip.bhm.bellsouth.net) |
| 16:10.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 16:14.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev getsmart (n=getsmart@host147-66-dynamic.17-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 16:14.04 | getsmart | hi guys |
| 16:14.25 | getsmart | say I have configured a sip account to dial out. is an account of a sip provider. Auth, succed, but I got 300 as response (sip multiple choice). |
| 16:14.32 | getsmart | any way to manage it? |
| 16:14.41 | Corydon76-dig | getsmart: #asterisk |
| 16:14.47 | getsmart | oh, well :) |
| 16:14.53 | getsmart | just coming from there |
| 16:15.16 | getsmart | redirecterd here :) sorry about that |
| 16:15.34 | Corydon76-dig | If your question isn't about C-level code, it generally belongs in #asterisk |
| 16:16.33 | getsmart | ok, so may ask the question: where find doc about how to manage sip 300 in asterisk (c code just fine to read) |
| 16:16.44 | tzafrir_laptop | <[TK]D-Fender> getsmart: Ok, thats interesting... this looks like an #asterisk-dev question |
| 16:16.49 | getsmart | yeah :) |
| 16:17.00 | getsmart | thanks for reporting. sorry guys |
| 16:17.12 | getsmart | just puzzling .... |
| 16:17.50 | getsmart | just looking for hints to proceed further |
| 16:19.09 | getsmart | say, case 300: /* Multiple Choices */ |
| 16:19.18 | getsmart | goes to parse_moved_contact(p, req); |
| 16:19.25 | getsmart | so it looks managed |
| 16:21.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-9092b3e1e59426f5) |
| 16:21.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 16:32.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=arodgers@204.239.8.157) |
| 16:33.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bweschke (n=BJ_Wesch@74.94.3.214) |
| 16:33.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bweschke] by ChanServ |
| 16:35.25 | file | hey bweschke |
| 16:35.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev russellb (n=russellb@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 16:35.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 16:39.00 | bweschke | hey file ! |
| 16:39.38 | lmadsen | hey bweschke!! |
| 16:39.48 | lmadsen | notices bweschke uses tab completion |
| 16:43.59 | putnopvut | I love reviewboard more and more every day. |
| 16:44.02 | russellb | heh |
| 16:44.15 | russellb | seanbright: did you use post-review for that? or did you just not add the description? |
| 16:44.26 | lmadsen | putnopvut: ya man... I've looked at some things, and it's pretty hawt |
| 16:44.29 | russellb | just wondering if there is something I need to tweak ... |
| 16:49.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarylVOIP (n=daryl@75.147.121.177) |
| 16:49.09 | bweschke | hey lmadsen! |
| 16:49.18 | lmadsen | bweschke: howdy my friend! |
| 16:49.28 | kpfleming | lmadsen: let jpeeler know about the mantis address change |
| 16:49.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarylVOIP (n=daryl@75.147.121.177) |
| 16:49.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@68.208.65.50) |
| 16:49.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 16:49.39 | lmadsen | jpeeler: ^^ |
| 16:49.40 | lmadsen | :) |
| 16:49.42 | lmadsen | will email |
| 16:49.56 | kpfleming | seanbright: hey, i used the ?: with no 'true value' thing this morning |
| 16:50.40 | lmadsen | also used that today.... but in dialplan |
| 16:52.14 | jpeeler | lmadsen: i think that's a mailserver setting, nothing changed in mantis |
| 16:52.18 | jpeeler | will check it out |
| 16:52.22 | lmadsen | merci |
| 16:52.30 | lmadsen | emailed you incase you can't get to it right away |
| 16:52.38 | lmadsen | since it's quite low priority |
| 16:52.52 | lmadsen | probably something in the mail server as you said because it's coming from insect |
| 16:53.28 | jpeeler | actually, can you forward one of the emails? |
| 16:53.43 | lmadsen | sure thing |
| 16:54.02 | lmadsen | done |
| 16:54.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (n=me@adsl-66-218-53-172.dslextreme.com) |
| 16:54.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak_ (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 16:54.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak_] by ChanServ |
| 16:57.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffspeff (n=jeff@c-69-245-31-86.hsd1.ky.comcast.net) |
| 16:58.20 | mvanbaak_ | mornin |
| 17:04.21 | putnopvut | hello mvanbaak_ |
| 17:05.00 | Qwell | M13846 |
| 17:05.02 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_misdn 0013846: GSM sound quality degraded reported by t-o (Karma: neutral) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13846 |
| 17:05.06 | Qwell | putnopvut: is that related to the stuff you did? |
| 17:05.20 | kpfleming | what does the little bubble-with-ellipsis on the reviewboard dashboard mean? |
| 17:05.29 | putnopvut | Qwell: what stuff I did? |
| 17:05.53 | Qwell | putnopvut: umm, chan_misdn timing stuff I think? |
| 17:06.09 | putnopvut | Qwell: I have no idea what you're talking about. |
| 17:06.19 | Qwell | recording too fast, or something |
| 17:06.32 | putnopvut | Oh, that was only for MixMonitor |
| 17:06.36 | Qwell | ahh |
| 17:06.40 | Qwell | so, no |
| 17:06.46 | putnopvut | Right, completely separate issue. |
| 17:08.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (i=vanbaak@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 17:08.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by ChanServ |
| 17:08.32 | Qwell | kpfleming: image is convo.png.. maybe it means you're involved? |
| 17:09.10 | mvanbaak | meh, forgot the screen session ;) |
| 17:11.01 | Qwell | oh, New Updates.. |
| 17:11.17 | Qwell | kpfleming: see ellipsis on the far right.. clicking that brings up a menu |
| 17:11.58 | kpfleming | ahh |
| 17:11.59 | kpfleming | thanks |
| 17:12.34 | kpfleming | do we have any plans to use the 'starred' feature for anything? |
| 17:14.23 | russellb | not yet |
| 17:14.30 | russellb | i think it's for your own use |
| 17:14.48 | russellb | if you have a long list of stuff in your review list, but you want to mark certain ones as most important for yourself to look at |
| 17:15.03 | russellb | starring it for you doesn't star it for others, i guess is what i'm saying ... |
| 17:15.13 | kpfleming | ok |
| 17:23.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ctooley (n=ctooley@doc-24-32-196-69.concordia.ks.cebridge.net) |
| 17:23.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o ctooley] by ChanServ |
| 17:29.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:29.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 17:29.54 | eliel | russellb: i have no permissions on -addons yet |
| 17:30.29 | russellb | eliel: k, one sec |
| 17:31.04 | russellb | you should now |
| 17:31.28 | Corydon76-dig | poketh russellb for a reviewboard account |
| 17:31.39 | russellb | what do you want the name to be? |
| 17:31.44 | russellb | tilghman ok? |
| 17:31.48 | Corydon76-dig | Corydon76 ok? |
| 17:31.59 | russellb | Can it please be real name based? |
| 17:32.05 | Corydon76-dig | Okay, tilghman, then |
| 17:32.09 | russellb | thank you :) |
| 17:32.22 | Corydon76-dig | You may have to remind me from time to time, though |
| 17:32.53 | seanbright | kpfleming: awesome. the ?: doesn't make the stack executable though, does it? |
| 17:32.57 | seanbright | pouts |
| 17:33.13 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: nope |
| 17:33.16 | seanbright | russellb: post-review for what? |
| 17:33.33 | seanbright | Corydon76-dig: i know that, silly. |
| 17:33.50 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: You asked, silly boy |
| 17:33.59 | russellb | seanbright: nevermind :) |
| 17:34.18 | seanbright | Corydon76-dig: it was in reference to my reluctant removal of the nested functions which i <3 |
| 17:34.43 | Corydon76-dig | nests seanbright |
| 17:36.22 | seanbright | holy crap |
| 17:36.27 | seanbright | lots'o'comments |
| 17:39.45 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: ping |
| 17:39.53 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: pong |
| 17:40.37 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: While I was adding LISTFILTER, I had a thought of another documentation element that might be useful to include in the XML: See also (which is a section included in The Book) |
| 17:40.56 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: it is already there :-) |
| 17:40.56 | russellb | seriously |
| 17:40.58 | russellb | ? |
| 17:41.03 | russellb | he's been adding those all over the place |
| 17:41.05 | russellb | read commits :-p |
| 17:41.14 | Corydon76-dig | Oh, okay |
| 17:41.25 | Corydon76-dig | I just didn't see any in func_strings.c |
| 17:41.31 | russellb | fair enough |
| 17:41.39 | russellb | yeah, they're just now starting to get added |
| 17:41.43 | russellb | there is a bunch that would be good to add |
| 17:42.06 | Corydon76-dig | CUT, FIELDQTY, and LISTFILTER are all related, as they all work on lists |
| 17:42.16 | eliel | yes, i am using tfot to add those, but new apps where add since the release of tfot for 1.4 |
| 17:42.55 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: I'd have to say that TFOT is pretty accurate in terms of the See also's |
| 17:42.59 | kpfleming | which probably means they should have related names too :-) |
| 17:43.08 | Corydon76-dig | (given that I edited most of them) ;-) |
| 17:43.31 | eliel | About this, I think the output for the see also tag should be somthing like 'appname(), funname(), etc()' and not what we have right now that is very confusing |
| 17:44.03 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: should be a differentiation between apps and functions |
| 17:44.30 | Corydon76-dig | Doesn't really matter what, just pick one and stick with it |
| 17:45.22 | Corydon76-dig | Apps have parens, functions don't (like tfot) or vice versa |
| 17:46.04 | eliel | well, i like that |
| 17:49.21 | seanbright | kpfleming: nub question... when you say to create a static function for freeing the tone zone, you mean an API call, correct? |
| 17:49.29 | seanbright | which would not have the 'static' keyword... |
| 17:49.31 | kpfleming | no, just a function in the module |
| 17:49.44 | seanbright | oh |
| 17:49.46 | kpfleming | since it would only be called from inside that module |
| 17:50.08 | seanbright | ohhhhhhhhhhh |
| 17:50.15 | seanbright | ok, i thought you meant free_zone() |
| 17:50.15 | russellb | ^_^ |
| 17:50.16 | seanbright | which is duped |
| 17:50.29 | seanbright | between main/indications.c and res/res_indications.c |
| 17:50.49 | kpfleming | just get rid of the code duplication, which has to be changed any time the structure gets modified |
| 17:50.52 | kpfleming | that was the point |
| 17:50.56 | seanbright | gotcha |
| 17:50.57 | seanbright | done and done. |
| 17:51.05 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: I duped that code to fix a memory leak |
| 17:52.32 | seanbright | how does doing that fix a leak? |
| 17:54.03 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: the list used to grow everytime you did a reload |
| 17:56.04 | seanbright | ah. |
| 17:56.37 | lmadsen | mvanbaak: ping! |
| 17:57.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@dsl093-157-131.phx1.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
| 17:58.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bweschke (n=BJ_Wesch@74.94.3.214) |
| 17:58.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bweschke] by ChanServ |
| 18:04.59 | eliel | I think the post-commit of -addons is not sending emails... |
| 18:05.40 | kpfleming | it is, i saw them |
| 18:07.57 | eliel | kpfleming: ups, you are right, i though it were being send to asterisk-commits, i wasn subscribed to asterisk-addons-commits |
| 18:16.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _ys (n=yuri@236-069.nat.mns.ru) |
| 18:19.54 | sasargen | i'm looking for a little help. i have been looking at app_voicemail.c in 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6.0, trying to understand how it loads global, per context, and per mailbox settings from voicemail.conf. |
| 18:20.02 | sasargen | i see that load_config() is hardcoded with variable names to check in the "general" context and sets global values |
| 18:20.16 | sasargen | i also see where it iterates through the contexts and adds each mailbox, setting options to an ast_vm_user struct for each mailbox |
| 18:20.31 | sasargen | however, i can't figure out where it handles per context values, or where it stores these values. can anyone explain how this or tell me where i should look for more info? |
| 18:57.53 | caio1982 | is it a feature or a bug not to be able to get information of meetme rooms if nobody has joined them yet (thus ast_conference is null?)? |
| 18:58.34 | Qwell | caio1982: they don't exist in memory unless there's somebody in the conference, I believe |
| 18:58.41 | caio1982 | yep |
| 18:59.00 | caio1982 | Qwell: i wonder if parsing meetme.conf in a command for that, in this case, would be too bad |
| 18:59.11 | caio1982 | as it's parsed every time someone joins a room anyway |
| 18:59.20 | caio1982 | Qwell: too hackish? :( |
| 19:01.42 | putnopvut | sasargen: there really aren't per-context values to be set in voicemail.conf. Each option pertains either globally (i.e. set in the general section) or per-mailbox. |
| 19:05.23 | sasargen | putnopvnt, thanks for response, that's what i thought, but the voicemail.conf.sample specifically says otherwise for 1.4 and 1.6 "; Define maximum number of messages per folder for a particular context." \n ";maxmsg=50" |
| 19:08.10 | sasargen | does that just mean the documentation is incorrect? |
| 19:08.28 | putnopvut | sasargen: hmm, I think it may be. I can double-check to be safe, though. |
| 19:10.37 | putnopvut | sasargen: The best I can see is that the only variable in voicemail.conf that can be set within a context, but not for a specific mailbox is the zonemessages setting. |
| 19:11.01 | putnopvut | I see this in the load_config function. |
| 19:12.43 | sasargen | puntonpvut: you mean where it parses the zonemessages context to get load definitions of time zones? |
| 19:13.12 | putnopvut | sasargen: ah, you're right. It is the zonemessages context. |
| 19:13.33 | putnopvut | ( I misread the strcasecmp as using "var" instead of "cat" as the first argument) |
| 19:15.22 | sasargen | putnopvut: the voicemail.conf.sample file for 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 all state that this usage is possible, but i don't see any code that would actually make it work |
| 19:16.03 | putnopvut | sasargen: it makes me wonder if perhaps that is a leftover piece of information from even pre-1.2. |
| 19:16.43 | sasargen | putnopvut: that's before my time :) |
| 19:16.48 | putnopvut | me, too :) |
| 19:17.15 | russellb | not me! |
| 19:17.15 | russellb | w00t |
| 19:18.19 | russellb | i don't recall per-context settings ever being supporte |
| 19:18.23 | putnopvut | um, speaking of weird configuration things in voicemail.conf, what is the purpose of the "options" setting? |
| 19:18.40 | russellb | however, I _do_ recall at one point something being merged and being taken back out ... |
| 19:18.49 | putnopvut | It looks like you could set up a nice stack overflow by doing something like options=options=options=options=options=options=options=... |
| 19:18.50 | russellb | that I vaguely remember as sounding similar to this ... |
| 19:19.24 | sasargen | putnopvut: option holds the "|" separated string of actual option values |
| 19:20.03 | putnopvut | sasargen: but you don't actually have to use the word "options" to set those. |
| 19:21.40 | seanbright | when i add a comment in reviewboard, does it e-mail everyone else? |
| 19:21.46 | seanbright | i didn't get a copy |
| 19:22.03 | putnopvut | seanbright: which review request? |
| 19:22.10 | seanbright | Convert open coded... |
| 19:22.20 | putnopvut | I just got one from you. |
| 19:22.23 | russellb | seanbright: you have to publish your comments |
| 19:22.28 | seanbright | i did... i think |
| 19:22.37 | russellb | oh ok, then yeah, it should go to all reviewers |
| 19:22.42 | putnopvut | yeah, I got it "Put back the description which somehow got lost" |
| 19:22.50 | sasargen | putnopvut: that whole option thing is handled by the strange combination of apply_options_full(), apply_options, and apply_option |
| 19:22.53 | seanbright | putnopvut: yeah... but did you get the memory leak comment? |
| 19:23.08 | seanbright | 29 minutes ago? |
| 19:23.18 | putnopvut | seanbright: I apparently did not. |
| 19:23.22 | seanbright | strange |
| 19:23.34 | putnopvut | I only have the initial request and the updated description. |
| 19:23.37 | seanbright | k |
| 19:24.32 | seanbright | i'm glad, because i think my observation was bogus :) |
| 19:24.41 | putnopvut | lol |
| 19:24.58 | putnopvut | So reviewboard didn't send the e-mail because it was smart enough to know that it shouldn't :) |
| 19:25.28 | russellb | however, the email settings on that server were just being tweaked with, so you might have hit a bad time window |
| 19:25.34 | seanbright | awesome! |
| 19:25.38 | putnopvut | ah, true |
| 19:26.38 | putnopvut | seanbright: I like your honesty in mentioning that you really had ohloh in mind more than anything for the list conversion :) |
| 19:26.49 | russellb | lol |
| 19:27.16 | russellb | that's awesome ... |
| 19:27.24 | seanbright | that may not have been... honest |
| 19:27.26 | putnopvut | seanbright: does ohloh still list your primary language as autoconf? |
| 19:27.29 | seanbright | someone asked for my motivation |
| 19:27.39 | seanbright | putnopvut: i think so, yeah. |
| 19:28.33 | seanbright | russellb: i keep looking over that "The original code inserted at the head of the list" comment |
| 19:28.43 | seanbright | and i think you're... not right |
| 19:28.44 | seanbright | heh |
| 19:28.54 | seanbright | or i just need more caffeine |
| 19:29.12 | russellb | let me look again, i may have misread |
| 19:29.37 | russellb | you're right |
| 19:29.37 | seanbright | keep in mind _INSERT_TAIL to an empty list is effectively an _INSERT_HEAD |
| 19:29.38 | russellb | i fail |
| 19:29.45 | seanbright | ok cool |
| 19:30.00 | seanbright | this marks the first time that i was right and russellb was wrong... |
| 19:30.04 | seanbright | needs a smoke |
| 19:30.11 | putnopvut | I have recorded this moment |
| 19:30.12 | russellb | considers taking up smoking |
| 19:30.24 | putnopvut | russellb: it's pretty awesome. Just don't overdo it. |
| 19:30.32 | russellb | ha |
| 19:30.54 | Qwell | russellb: I'm sure Julie would be *thrilled* with that |
| 19:31.22 | russellb | yes! |
| 19:31.45 | Qwell | offers russellb some nicotine gum, to quit before he starts |
| 19:32.06 | russellb | declines |
| 19:32.07 | Qwell | "second hand smoke kills." "looks like I made the right choice then..." |
| 19:37.03 | sasargen | putnopvut: russellb: it looks like app_directory.c does check per-context in voicemail.conf for "directoryintro", but nothing in app_voicemail.c does |
| 19:37.26 | snuff-home | mm what happened to our bots.. no pastrychef.. |
| 19:38.09 | putnopvut | sasargen: you are correct, sir. |
| 19:38.16 | russellb | the server they were on has gone out of commission |
| 19:38.24 | russellb | i'll bring them back eventually |
| 19:38.40 | seanbright | commit commit commit! |
| 19:38.47 | seanbright | oh, he's still here. |
| 19:39.07 | snuff-home | ah.. thought that might have been the case.. |
| 19:39.22 | snuff-home | goes and views commits mailing list |
| 19:43.33 | sasargen | putnopvut: russellb: i don't want per-context settings for voicemail, but should i file a bug since the documentation doesn't match the functionality? |
| 19:44.11 | putnopvut | sasargen: It's such an easy thing to fix, I think I can just make the change right now while I'm thinking about it. |
| 19:45.06 | sasargen | putnopvut: yeah! easy changes are fun |
| 19:45.56 | sasargen | putnopvut: would that automatically fix it for 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6? |
| 19:46.24 | putnopvut | I'm only putting the documentation change in 1.4, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, and trunk. |
| 19:47.09 | seanbright | Qwell: hey, thanks guy |
| 19:47.54 | sasargen | putnopvut: now everybody will think that the functionality was removed from 1.4 just to cause heartbreak for users :) |
| 19:48.38 | putnopvut | sasargen: yeah, it may seem a bit odd. The thing is 1.2 only gets security updates now. |
| 19:50.41 | sasargen | putnopvut: yep, just want to give jsmith a heads-up in case uncle ward comes after him about it |
| 19:51.44 | putnopvut | Gotcha. I tried to make it clear in the commit message that I was just updating the documentation so that it would be correct. |
| 19:52.40 | jsmith | sasargen: What makes you think that would happen? :-) |
| 19:52.45 | jsmith | sighs |
| 19:56.11 | seanbright | putnopvut: you know what... i think ohloh just lists them alphabetically |
| 19:56.32 | seanbright | oh! C is higher now! woo |
| 20:02.13 | putnopvut | yay! |
| 20:13.25 | Qwell | seanbright: now where's mine? :P |
| 20:14.01 | seanbright | heh |
| 20:14.17 | seanbright | i can't just kudo right back |
| 20:14.20 | seanbright | it wouldn't seem sincere |
| 20:17.16 | Qwell | do they still make Kudos? |
| 20:17.24 | seanbright | i hope so |
| 20:17.26 | seanbright | i want one |
| 20:17.50 | jsmith | Yes |
| 20:18.32 | putnopvut | I don't like Kudos as much as most other types of granola bars. |
| 20:18.56 | seanbright | Qwell: you need a picture on ohlot |
| 20:19.02 | seanbright | s/lot/loh/ |
| 20:19.03 | Qwell | no I don't |
| 20:19.20 | Qwell | no pictures of me exist |
| 20:19.56 | putnopvut | seanbright: so...seeing your picture on ohloh, I have to say, you're a bit young to have the smoking habit you do. |
| 20:20.13 | seanbright | putnopvut: that was 1985 |
| 20:20.18 | seanbright | before you were born |
| 20:20.19 | seanbright | heh |
| 20:20.32 | putnopvut | Give me some credit here! I was born in '83 |
| 20:21.07 | seanbright | i'll be 30 in like 2 months |
| 20:21.09 | seanbright | i'm depressed |
| 20:21.22 | putnopvut | I will be 25 in 29 days. |
| 20:21.24 | file | I'm file. |
| 20:23.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 20:23.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 20:29.27 | lmadsen | I will be 28 soonish |
| 20:30.06 | bweschke | is started to feel very old |
| 20:30.44 | jsmith | bweschke: You too, eh? |
| 20:30.58 | bweschke | jsmith: good. so it's not just me. :-D |
| 20:31.16 | jsmith | bweschke: No, I'm now classified as an "old fart" |
| 20:36.42 | putnopvut | man, all these new kudos...maybe I'll reach rank 10 :) |
| 20:46.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev telecos (n=sergio@84.166.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) |
| 21:01.15 | kpfleming | ugh.. i am being kudo'd all over the place |
| 21:02.21 | putnopvut | Are you complaining? |
| 21:02.49 | kpfleming | well, i should return the favors, but i'm busy |
| 21:04.05 | russellb | same here, heh |
| 21:06.30 | lmadsen | what is all this talk about kudo? |
| 21:06.37 | lmadsen | does not know what this "kudo" is |
| 21:07.47 | kpfleming | ohloh |
| 21:12.11 | snuff-work | kudos = good will |
| 21:16.39 | bweschke | kpfleming: do you guys have the candy bars that they have to give out when they give one ? |
| 21:16.54 | kpfleming | no |
| 21:17.07 | bweschke | kpfleming: implement that policy - it makes them much more valuable. ;-) |
| 21:21.18 | seanbright | i kudo'd everyone |
| 21:21.31 | seanbright | i'm a kudo slut |
| 21:21.54 | russellb | s/kudo // |
| 21:22.12 | seanbright | well that goes without saying |
| 21:23.35 | bweschke | http://www.kudosbar.com/kudos/index.htm |
| 21:24.04 | seanbright | mmmmmmmm |
| 21:24.12 | seanbright | and only 100 calories! |
| 21:24.21 | seanbright | i am watching my girlish figure. |
| 21:24.36 | Corydon76-dig | o.O |
| 21:24.37 | bweschke | they are quite good - if I do say so myself. :-) |
| 21:24.48 | snuff-work | finds that a little disturbing |
| 21:25.05 | Corydon76-dig | wonders what seanbright's cup size is |
| 21:25.10 | snuff-work | lmao |
| 21:25.12 | seanbright | come on... i've been in here for *months* |
| 21:25.13 | bweschke | wow |
| 21:25.16 | seanbright | i make jokes, that's what i do |
| 21:25.20 | bweschke | lol |
| 21:27.34 | snuff-work | mm.. what is it with hp and sun.. both have redone their website in the past couple of weeks |
| 21:28.13 | seanbright | is going to try and sneak a bool in his next patch... |
| 21:28.52 | seanbright | not too sneaky since i announced it. |
| 21:29.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sergee (n=serg@voip1.west-call.com) |
| 21:35.57 | seanbright | i can't fix this, but i keep seeing it |
| 21:35.59 | seanbright | http://pastebin.ca/1247297 |
| 21:43.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JT (n=j@unaffiliated/jt) |
| 21:44.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 21:44.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 22:00.14 | russellb | seanbright: smartass :-p |
| 22:07.15 | seanbright | stop acting surprised :) |
| 22:08.20 | snuff-work | so who's un-nesting functions.. poor jtodd on bug tracker already fallen on osx menuselect :) |
| 22:08.51 | seanbright | bug #? |
| 22:09.42 | seanbright | got it |
| 22:10.46 | snuff-work | ;) |
| 22:10.46 | seanbright | oh crap |
| 22:10.46 | seanbright | we forgot about menuselect |
| 22:10.46 | kpfleming | i thought i undid that one already |
| 22:10.53 | seanbright | you left a stub |
| 22:10.56 | kpfleming | oh |
| 22:10.58 | kpfleming | oops |
| 22:13.44 | seanbright | it's much easier to find nested functions when there is an 'auto ' in front of them |
| 22:15.02 | kpfleming | seanbright: you are a character |
| 22:15.25 | seanbright | i can tone it down if you like :) |
| 22:15.25 | russellb | actually, he's 10 of them |
| 22:15.33 | kpfleming | ouch |
| 22:15.42 | seanbright | i take it as a compliment |
| 22:15.52 | seanbright | we all do |
| 22:17.50 | seanbright | kpfleming: does this mean anything to you: |
| 22:17.51 | seanbright | /home/sbright/dev/asterisk/openlist/include/asterisk/utils.h:532: error: â__memcpy_ichkâ is static but used in inline function â_ast_strndupâ which is not static |
| 22:18.01 | seanbright | besides where my home directory is. |
| 22:18.09 | kpfleming | weird |
| 22:18.19 | seanbright | 4.3.2 |
| 22:18.21 | kpfleming | no, i don't think i've ever seen that before |
| 22:18.28 | seanbright | when building res_snmp |
| 22:18.30 | seanbright | ok |
| 22:19.44 | kpfleming | res_snmp builds for me with 4.3.2 |
| 22:20.25 | seanbright | alrighty. probably a local env thing. |
| 22:34.46 | kpfleming | cripes... i need to pass an additional bit of information in to ast_add_extension2, which would result in ast_add_extension3 |
| 22:35.14 | russellb | ha |
| 22:35.24 | russellb | time to create a struct. |
| 22:35.28 | seanbright | you doing the 'except ->' thing? |
| 22:35.32 | seanbright | err, except => |
| 22:36.46 | kpfleming | yes |
| 22:36.49 | seanbright | awesome |
| 22:36.50 | kpfleming | playing with it anyway |
| 22:37.16 | kpfleming | but even adding a struct doesn't help a lot, unless the struct has a 'version' field so it can be ABI compatible |
| 22:37.27 | kpfleming | but i'll follow that route for now |
| 22:37.33 | kpfleming | since this is just an experiment anyway |
| 22:37.36 | russellb | right .. |
| 22:40.05 | kpfleming | something for my computer to chew on compiling while i do real work |
| 22:41.08 | jtodd | looks like nesting problem may be solved for MacOS - it's compiling further than it did before... |
| 22:41.31 | seanbright | asterisk will still die... unless we added the nested function argument in cflags |
| 22:42.08 | kpfleming | we removed the nested functions, right? |
| 22:42.14 | seanbright | not committed |
| 22:42.18 | kpfleming | oh |
| 22:42.24 | jtodd | Just hit an ael/ael_lex error. |
| 22:42.25 | kpfleming | well, jtodd, don't waste your time, they are going away anyway |
| 22:42.33 | jtodd | "GLOB _ABORTED" undeclared. |
| 22:42.37 | seanbright | ugh |
| 22:42.39 | kpfleming | weird |
| 22:42.44 | kpfleming | trunk? |
| 22:42.48 | jtodd | Yep. |
| 22:42.50 | snuff-work | heh didn't u fix that? glob.. |
| 22:42.52 | seanbright | is there really a space there? |
| 22:43.02 | seanbright | snuff-work: on solaris, yes. |
| 22:43.08 | jtodd | ael.flex:574: error: 'GLOB_ABORTED' undeclared (first use in this function) |
| 22:43.14 | seanbright | oh good |
| 22:43.33 | kpfleming | it's defined further up in that very file |
| 22:43.46 | jtodd | ael.flex:71:1: warning: "GLOB_ABORTED" redefined |
| 22:44.10 | kpfleming | oh... so a newer version of darwin has i tnow |
| 22:44.12 | kpfleming | lovely |
| 22:44.28 | jtodd | Or I could just dump the ~8 lines of error entirely if anyone wants me to clutter up the channel with it. |
| 22:44.43 | kpfleming | can you try commenting out line 823 of res/ael/ael_lex.c? |
| 22:44.49 | jtodd | sure, hang on. |
| 22:45.32 | jtodd | works. |
| 22:45.48 | codefreeze-lap | hmmm, sounds like that pesky glob stuff for pattern matching in includes |
| 22:45.52 | kpfleming | ok |
| 22:46.02 | kpfleming | so we need to change that code to just check to see if GLOB_ABORTED is already defined |
| 22:46.10 | kpfleming | not always define it on Darwin |
| 22:46.13 | codefreeze-lap | but be careful, guys, ael_lex.c is generated. Changing it will get undone in future |
| 22:46.21 | kpfleming | because apparently the latest Darwin has it nw |
| 22:46.32 | kpfleming | codefreeze-lap: yes, i know, i know how to rebuild it, just did it a few days ago :_) |
| 22:46.48 | codefreeze-lap | just a reminder |
| 22:47.14 | kpfleming | thanks |
| 22:47.37 | seanbright | i locally modify my makefile to regenerate it :) |
| 22:49.27 | kpfleming | jtodd: ok, you can revert your local change and update |
| 22:51.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bird_of_Luck (n=melifaro@secured.by.ipfw.ru) |
| 22:59.01 | jtodd | OK. |
| 23:00.06 | seanbright | is that something that configure can/should figure out? |
| 23:03.03 | jtodd | kpfleming: Problem solved. Will close bug. |
| 23:09.44 | kpfleming | thanks |
| 23:09.48 | kpfleming | seanbright: ideally, yes |
| 23:09.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@bzq-179-75-202.static.bezeqint.net) |
| 23:09.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 23:10.12 | kpfleming | ideally, there would never be any platform-specific ifdefs in the code at all, it should all be handled by the configure script |
| 23:10.58 | seanbright | but that's a PITA |
| 23:11.13 | kpfleming | why? |
| 23:11.23 | kpfleming | it means we never have to do what i just did |
| 23:11.29 | seanbright | i thought that is where you were going with it |
| 23:11.36 | seanbright | i should have added a ? to the end |
| 23:11.46 | kpfleming | lol |
| 23:11.53 | kpfleming | but not ?: |
| 23:12.01 | seanbright | i saw that a few minutes ago |
| 23:12.03 | seanbright | well played. |
| 23:12.12 | russellb | that would cause a disturbance in the force |
| 23:12.21 | seanbright | oh it's committed, baby |
| 23:12.37 | seanbright | commit asterisk 155080 |
| 23:12.43 | MuffinMan | [155080] Committed by kpfleming on 2008-11-06T21:12:03.566055Z: coding style/guidelines cleanup, plus use new side-effect safe S_OR |
| 23:12.44 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 23:12.44 | MuffinMan | .. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=155080 |
| 23:12.49 | seanbright | hawt. |
| 23:13.43 | russellb | ha |
| 23:13.49 | russellb | why not use ast_string_or() there? |
| 23:13.56 | kpfleming | sure |
| 23:14.13 | kpfleming | i'd replace it in the entire tree if i was up to it |
| 23:14.31 | russellb | no, I meant use ast_string_or instead of the ?: you added |
| 23:14.40 | seanbright | yeah... how about we *not* make that a janitor |
| 23:14.41 | russellb | ast_variable_retrieve() ?: "default" |
| 23:15.33 | russellb | shrugs |
| 23:17.00 | russellb | annnnnnnnnnnnyway |
| 23:17.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sasargen (n=chatzill@173-7-245-142.area7.spcsdns.net) |
| 23:17.00 | seanbright | i'll tell you why... because ?: is *awesome* |
| 23:17.00 | seanbright | that's why |
| 23:17.00 | russellb | nub |
| 23:17.13 | russellb | that's what you are! |
| 23:17.38 | seanbright | one time, at band camp, i put a ?: in my ternary statement |
| 23:17.49 | russellb | oh no you didn't! |
| 23:18.04 | seanbright | heh |
| 23:18.13 | seanbright | so how about that open source PBX, asterisk? |
| 23:18.29 | russellb | never heard of it |
| 23:18.38 | seanbright | i hear they use nested functions |
| 23:18.44 | seanbright | laaaaaaaaaaaaame |
| 23:23.59 | seanbright | as an asterisk related aside... i know you two gents (russellb & kpfleming) are busy, but i'd like you to take anotehr gander at this two reviewboard jobbies and give me a thumbs up or down. the ao2_callback thing in chan_sip i'm a little iffy on. anyway, no rush. |
| 23:24.18 | kpfleming | yes, tomorrow |
| 23:24.53 | russellb | yes, tomorrow |
| 23:26.11 | russellb | for now, http://icanhascheezburger.com |
| 23:26.15 | russellb | jk |
| 23:26.30 | snuff-work | dance skillz i got em |
| 23:37.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.34.1) |
| 23:40.28 | Qwell | d'oh |
| 23:40.34 | lmadsen | lol |
| 23:59.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-9092b3e1e59426f5) |
| 23:59.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sergee (n=serg@voip1.west-call.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (n=putnopvu@nat/digium/x-f7f48e86c9c89fef) |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pgarcia (n=chatzill@yoda.kanatek.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mbranca (n=matteo@93-62-230-243.ip24.fastwebnet.it) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 23:59.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+oooo Deeewayne putnopvut kpfleming jpeeler] by irc.freenode.net |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev MuffinMan (n=muffinma@asterisk/issue-tracker-bot/muffinman) |
| 23:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-d6c5048d458cbaea) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |