| 00:22.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sysreq (n=sysreq@unaffiliated/sysreq) |
| 01:41.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev russellb_ (n=russell@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 01:41.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o russellb_] by ChanServ |
| 02:22.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 02:22.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 03:05.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@CPE00195bf6526b-CM0018682bdbd4.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 03:10.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.34.8) |
| 03:36.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev russellb_ (n=russell@asterisk/digium-open-source-team-lead/russellb) |
| 03:36.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o russellb_] by ChanServ |
| 05:00.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=arodgers@S010600095b33697f.vc.shawcable.net) |
| 10:20.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fiesch (n=MFischal@host-88-217-147-18.customer.m-online.net) |
| 10:20.29 | *** part/#asterisk-dev fiesch (n=MFischal@host-88-217-147-18.customer.m-online.net) |
| 10:23.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (n=eliels@200.61.172.61) |
| 10:23.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 10:47.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mosty (n=mosty@130.41.233.220.exetel.com.au) |
| 11:01.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 11:58.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.34.2) |
| 12:15.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ctooley (n=ctooley@mo-71-1-105-142.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |
| 12:15.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o ctooley] by ChanServ |
| 12:47.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev shazaum (n=shazaum@unaffiliated/shazaum) |
| 13:03.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sasargen (n=chatzill@70.4.72.139) |
| 13:04.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev easycrypt (n=savek@ip-62-155.emscb.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) |
| 13:04.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dioedu (n=dioedu@201.7.117.114) |
| 13:35.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.251.152) |
| 13:40.53 | lmadsen | happy monday! |
| 13:41.33 | russellb | grumbles |
| 13:41.37 | russellb | good mornin' lmadsen |
| 13:41.46 | lmadsen | heh... how goes today sir? |
| 13:41.54 | Marquis42 | lmadsen: Not sure how happy it is, but it is Monday... |
| 13:42.03 | lmadsen | Marquis42: :D |
| 13:42.05 | russellb | today is good so far |
| 13:42.09 | lmadsen | I just woke up and I'm way too chipper |
| 13:42.37 | russellb | yeah, you need to stop that |
| 13:42.47 | lmadsen | someones gotta be right? |
| 13:43.01 | russellb | not necessarily :) |
| 13:45.16 | lmadsen | so based on phone call that John Todd et al plus I had on Friday, I may start a process to prune old accounts on the bug tracker that have not been logged into since January of 2006 (or some other arbitrary date to be decided). I would give warning on the -dev list and such, but I think it might be about time to clean up that database |
| 13:45.27 | lmadsen | thoughts? |
| 13:48.46 | russellb | you can't really do that. |
| 13:49.05 | russellb | because if the accounts have ever been active, there is issue history associated with the account |
| 13:49.09 | russellb | you can't just delete the account |
| 13:49.26 | russellb | so, the pruning will need to be more intelligent than that |
| 13:49.48 | russellb | if the account hasn't been logged in to for a long time, and has never created an issue, uploaded a file, made a comment, etc ... |
| 13:50.55 | lmadsen | ok, that makes sense then |
| 13:51.05 | lmadsen | that is good feedback |
| 13:51.26 | lmadsen | so basically we can prune accounts that don't have any activity on the bug tracker |
| 13:52.09 | russellb | nods |
| 13:52.13 | lmadsen | there are currently 23 accounts that have never been logged into :) |
| 13:52.15 | russellb | and aren't so new that we haven't given them a chance :) |
| 13:52.39 | lmadsen | aye |
| 13:52.50 | lmadsen | I'm surprised the number of never logged in accounts is so low |
| 13:53.07 | russellb | well there is an easy button to prune those |
| 13:53.15 | russellb | and has been done a number of times |
| 13:53.47 | lmadsen | yes, I see the button. It's on the same page as the number I was looking at |
| 13:55.03 | russellb | I can get you a database dump if you want to work on the pruning query ... |
| 13:55.09 | mvanbaak | [in his best Deedee voice] 'oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, what does this button doooooooooooooooooooo' |
| 13:55.12 | russellb | but ... what's the motivation for doing it? |
| 13:57.05 | lmadsen | basically to clean up the database in the hopes we can eventually merge with asterisk.org |
| 13:57.27 | lmadsen | for the documentation project too |
| 13:57.55 | lmadsen | we may want to use the same licenses, or licensing scheme to control documentation submissions, just like code submissions |
| 13:58.48 | lmadsen | on a side note.... man I've been getting a lot of spam in my digium account lately |
| 13:59.10 | russellb | same here |
| 13:59.21 | russellb | make sure they have postini enabled for you .. |
| 13:59.26 | russellb | i have it, but some still gets by |
| 14:00.59 | lmadsen | ya... I get some sort of quarantine msg every few days |
| 14:01.15 | lmadsen | just been worse lately... but easy enough to delete |
| 14:01.43 | lmadsen | anyways, time to make me some breakfast and have a shower and such. If you remember to shoot me over that DB sometime over the next week or so that'd be great. |
| 14:13.36 | Juggie | lmadsen, why delete the accounts, mantis just needs to be smarter |
| 14:13.51 | lmadsen | it's not about mantis |
| 14:13.55 | Juggie | eg, in the reporter drop down box, why not list people that have actually reported a bug, vs, every single user. |
| 14:14.07 | lmadsen | it's about merging databases of logins to eventually get to a single login between the two sites |
| 14:14.20 | Juggie | whats site #2 |
| 14:14.35 | lmadsen | see above |
| 14:15.29 | Juggie | ah ic |
| 14:15.47 | Juggie | mantis accounts should take precedance :) |
| 14:24.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sysreq (n=sysreq@unaffiliated/sysreq) |
| 14:25.19 | lmadsen | not something you'll have to worry about for quite some time |
| 14:37.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev codefreeze-lap (n=murf@72.21.67.40) |
| 14:37.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o codefreeze-lap] by ChanServ |
| 14:39.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtodd (n=jtodd@blob.fox-den.com) |
| 14:50.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gambler1 (n=mene_sun@dragan.eunet.yu) |
| 15:00.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmooze (n=schmooze@h69-129-142-83.mdsnwi.tisp.static.tds.net) |
| 15:11.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Rem| (n=remi@bg-fw2out.monmouth.com) |
| 15:15.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@unaffiliated/jameswf-home) |
| 15:38.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (n=sruffell@nat/digium/x-c70148d58ad7dd06) |
| 15:38.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:39.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mog (n=mog@nat/digium/x-f29c2cfacc657fd3) |
| 15:39.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mog] by ChanServ |
| 15:48.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:55.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-d793fe808324370c) |
| 15:55.39 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 16:10.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 16:12.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 16:18.05 | eliel | russellb: thanks for the review on manager logout, i knew i was doing something wrong there... |
| 16:18.48 | russellb | no problem |
| 16:19.45 | Juggie | nice.... a phone call from 1-000-000-0000 |
| 16:19.49 | Juggie | i'll surely answer that |
| 16:20.35 | denon | maybe it's the first guy to ever get a nanpa number issued! |
| 16:20.38 | denon | you could be missing out |
| 16:21.39 | Juggie | scratch that |
| 16:21.41 | Juggie | its got 10's |
| 16:21.46 | Juggie | er, 10 0's |
| 16:22.06 | Juggie | hmm nm i'm dumb thats correct |
| 16:22.09 | Juggie | anyway no thanks ;) |
| 16:27.37 | lmadsen | Juggie: heh, I've gotten that number before -- it's a call that you've won a cruise :) |
| 16:34.19 | tzanger | yep |
| 16:34.30 | tzanger | (foghorn) this is your captain speaking... |
| 16:34.49 | tzanger | that's where I wish I could send ONE POINT TWENTY ONE JIGGAWATTS down the copper pair |
| 16:35.21 | tzafrir_laptop | do you hate your provider that much? |
| 16:35.23 | mvanbaak | </violence_mode> |
| 16:42.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-lap (n=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 16:42.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 16:43.52 | freddyk | any news about new bridging routines |
| 16:43.53 | freddyk | ? |
| 16:44.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (n=me@adsl-66-218-53-172.dslextreme.com) |
| 16:44.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 16:44.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 17:05.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev flujan (n=flujan@internet.nube.com.br) |
| 17:05.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtodd (n=jtodd@blob.fox-den.com) |
| 17:21.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev brookshire (i=mbrooks@hijacked.us) |
| 17:22.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rene- (n=renemend@200.34.66.137) |
| 17:23.07 | *** part/#asterisk-dev rene- (n=renemend@200.34.66.137) |
| 17:27.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev korihor (n=korihor@201.210.239.172) |
| 17:33.05 | jsmith-teaching | freddyk: You'd have to talk to file... that's his baby |
| 17:33.38 | file | freddyk: questions asked may get answered |
| 17:34.13 | Corydon76-lap | jsmith-teaching: it keeps him up all night? |
| 17:35.22 | jsmith-teaching | Corydon76-dig: Yeah... but luckily I haven't seen it spit up or need diaper changes |
| 17:35.40 | Qwell | just wait |
| 17:38.22 | russellb | Corydon76-lap: chan_sip is upset right now ... |
| 17:38.31 | russellb | likely related to ast_str_opaque |
| 17:38.38 | Corydon76-lap | OK |
| 17:39.31 | Corydon76-lap | Have a crash? |
| 17:39.32 | russellb | [Dec 15 11:44:19] WARNING[3827]: chan_sip.c:12018 get_destination: Huh? Not a SIP header ()? |
| 17:39.40 | russellb | i get that every time it gets a SUBSCRIBE |
| 17:41.09 | Corydon76-lap | russellb: Hrm, that doesn't appear to be using ast_str at all right there |
| 17:41.46 | russellb | hm, ok |
| 17:41.52 | russellb | I may have jumped the gun on passing the blame :-) |
| 17:42.26 | file | wonders |
| 17:45.07 | putnopvut | russellb: out of curiosity, what is the top line of the SUBSCRIBE? Just wondering if it really isn't a SIP URI... |
| 17:45.47 | lmadsen | russellb: heh, yep, I saw that same thing this morning too |
| 17:46.35 | russellb | SUBSCRIBE sip:station1_line2@milo:5060 SIP/2.0 |
| 17:47.05 | Qwell | ooo, russellb |
| 17:47.10 | Qwell | buildbot is mad at you :p |
| 17:47.15 | russellb | sweet |
| 17:48.49 | russellb | Qwell: those don't appear to be my fault |
| 17:49.03 | Qwell | russellb: it misplaces blame a lot |
| 17:50.21 | file | blames Qwell |
| 17:50.57 | Corydon76-lap | blames file |
| 17:55.47 | russellb | plays the blame game |
| 17:56.42 | jsmith-teaching | figures that he's probably to blame |
| 17:56.57 | russellb | it's probably file's fault, actually |
| 17:57.24 | file | russellb: that change I did wouldn't have done it! |
| 17:57.40 | Qwell | that's what they all say! |
| 17:57.43 | russellb | file: if not directly, then indirectly for sure |
| 17:58.38 | file | hrm, that is true |
| 18:07.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-4c02d21bba67dd54) |
| 18:07.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 18:13.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@CPE00195bf6526b-CM0018682bdbd4.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 18:15.36 | *** part/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-bd8eabb52cbe799f) |
| 18:15.36 | russellb | Corydon76-lap: confirmed that the ast_str merge introduced this issue ... |
| 18:15.46 | russellb | now to look through the changes to see what went wrong |
| 18:16.22 | Corydon76-lap | Nothing can go wrong... go wrong... go wrong... |
| 18:25.39 | Corydon76-lap | s/go wrong.../go wrong... <click> /g |
| 18:30.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (n=davidvos@74-47-21-87.dsl1.ckvl.tn.frontiernet.net) |
| 18:31.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=arodgers@204.239.10.119) |
| 18:31.29 | russellb | Corydon76-lap: it would be good if you looked, too |
| 18:31.58 | Corydon76-lap | russellb: I was looking, and it wasn't clear. |
| 18:32.11 | russellb | k |
| 18:39.15 | Corydon76-lap | russellb: the only major change other than the conversion to opacity was in passing in -1 to many ast_str_append, where the buffer should have been large enough already |
| 18:40.23 | russellb | i tried changing those back to 0 and that wasn't it |
| 18:44.46 | Corydon76-lap | The only other places I was thinking of were in init_req and init_resp |
| 18:47.01 | russellb | if we're going to use this -1 thing, we need to increase SIP_MIN_PACKET |
| 18:47.09 | russellb | the whole point of using ast_str was to support packets > 4096 bytes |
| 18:47.19 | russellb | by using -1 to restrict resizing, we're now limited to 1024 bytes |
| 18:47.21 | russellb | which is bad .. |
| 18:47.51 | Corydon76-lap | But the point was that we're indexing pointers inside of the dynamic string, which, if resized, the pointers become invalid |
| 18:47.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (n=sruffell@nat/digium/x-af4eb482d98d80d0) |
| 18:47.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 18:47.58 | russellb | right, i totally understand |
| 18:48.11 | russellb | which is why instead of changing -1 back to 0, we need to make the packet size 4096 instead of 1024 |
| 18:48.21 | russellb | so that it works just like 1.4 |
| 19:37.08 | *** part/#asterisk-dev flujan (n=flujan@internet.nube.com.br) |
| 19:48.54 | russellb | thanks Corydon76-lap |
| 19:53.43 | sruffell | tzafrir_laptop: creating symlinks for libtonezone.so.1 and libtonezone.so.1.0 worked on my test here. ldconfig will only recreate the so.2.0 link. So...any objections before committing and rolling 2.1.0.2 of dahdi-tools? |
| 19:53.54 | Qwell | sruffell: What is the proposed fix? |
| 19:54.05 | sruffell | ah..and I was just looking to see if you were logged in here. |
| 19:54.33 | sruffell | manually creating the symlinks to 1.0 and 1 to the 2.0 library. |
| 19:54.44 | Qwell | I know Kevin had a thought about it, but not sure he ever said what his thought was :) |
| 19:54.58 | sruffell | in his email, he was just talking about rolling it back to 1.0 |
| 19:54.59 | Qwell | so libtonezone would install 5 .so.* files? |
| 19:55.11 | sruffell | 2 so files, and 4 symlinks |
| 19:55.12 | Qwell | .so, .so.1, .so.1.0, .so.2, .so.2.0 ? |
| 19:55.21 | Qwell | 2 so files? |
| 19:55.24 | sruffell | well..actuall, one .a file, one .so.2.0 file, and 4 symlinks |
| 19:55.28 | Qwell | ok |
| 19:55.34 | sruffell | -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 207164 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.a |
| 19:55.35 | sruffell | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.so -> libtonezone.so.2.0 |
| 19:55.35 | sruffell | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1 -> libtonezone.so.2.0 |
| 19:55.35 | sruffell | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1.0 -> libtonezone.so.2.0 |
| 19:55.35 | sruffell | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.2 -> libtonezone.so.2.0 |
| 19:55.35 | sruffell | -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 204069 Dec 15 11:47 /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.2.0 |
| 19:55.52 | Qwell | and SO2 is backwards compat? |
| 19:56.02 | Qwell | (yes, my terminology is terrible there) |
| 19:56.15 | sruffell | yes...with the exception of the one in zap, but then you'll get an error that /dev/zap can't be opened. |
| 19:56.15 | tzafrir_laptop | Qwell, the ABI and API have not changed |
| 19:56.22 | Qwell | okay |
| 19:56.31 | tzafrir_laptop | the change is zaptel->dahdi (in the implementation) |
| 19:56.46 | sruffell | so commit? |
| 19:56.48 | Qwell | so what happens if you have an older version of 1.4? |
| 19:56.54 | Qwell | pre 1.4.22/dahdi changes |
| 19:57.08 | sruffell | then you will get a failure on chan_zap anyway. |
| 19:57.16 | Qwell | then...you'd be silly for installing dahdi. gotcha |
| 19:57.16 | sruffell | because you won't see any of the /dev/zap files. |
| 19:57.25 | Qwell | worksforme |
| 19:57.26 | tzafrir_laptop | earlier versions hsould have conflicted |
| 19:57.43 | Qwell | oh |
| 19:57.55 | Qwell | what happens with builds of Asterisk that are done after this change? |
| 19:58.06 | Qwell | will they link against .so.1.0 or .so.2.0? |
| 19:58.15 | tzafrir_laptop | sruffell, maybe add a note to packagers that those symlinks are not requires unless you want to be compatible to the specific dahdi-tools version |
| 19:59.04 | tzafrir_laptop | (a comment in the makefile?) |
| 19:59.24 | sruffell | good idea. |
| 19:59.36 | sruffell | they will link with so.2.0 |
| 19:59.42 | Qwell | cool |
| 19:59.52 | Qwell | because .so.2.0 is the "real" file, right? |
| 19:59.56 | sruffell | right. |
| 20:00.00 | Qwell | k |
| 20:00.14 | sruffell | ok..I'll add the comment, commit, and start rolling the next release. |
| 20:00.36 | sruffell | 2.1.0.2+2.1.0.2 is a long version..... |
| 20:00.54 | Qwell | sruffell: You haven't seen my dahdi kernel package versions. |
| 20:01.01 | sruffell | heh... |
| 20:01.13 | Qwell | kmod-dahdi-linux-PAE-2.0.0-1_centos5.2.6.18_92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm |
| 20:01.36 | sruffell | no dahdi specific version number in there? |
| 20:01.40 | Qwell | 2.0.0 |
| 20:01.47 | sruffell | ahh... |
| 20:01.52 | sruffell | hits self on head |
| 20:01.58 | Qwell | sorry, should've linked the other one, heh |
| 20:02.07 | Qwell | kmod-dahdi-linux-PAE-2.1.0-1_centos5.2.6.18_92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm |
| 20:03.02 | sruffell | I'm just going to add the note in the Makefile where the links are created... |
| 20:03.23 | Qwell | +1 |
| 20:03.50 | sruffell | actually..meeting brb |
| 20:50.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mog (n=mog@nat/digium/x-1fedce2afa829be7) |
| 20:50.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mog] by ChanServ |
| 21:12.38 | snuff-work | putnopvut: ping? |
| 21:14.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-75b7e425a10117f4) |
| 21:15.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (n=otherwis@72.128.38.41) |
| 21:18.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev BlargMaN00 (n=blarg@12.234.16.130) |
| 21:18.35 | BlargMaN00 | can someone help me figure out why I * won't create a core.* file?? |
| 21:18.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev qdk (n=qdk@94.191.229.7.bredband.3.dk) |
| 21:19.04 | Corydon76-lap | BlargMaN00: please ask in #asterisk |
| 21:22.22 | *** part/#asterisk-dev BlargMaN00 (n=blarg@12.234.16.130) |
| 21:22.45 | putnopvut | snuff-work: pong |
| 21:24.36 | snuff-work | i updated the jabber review.. as per the 'JID' screenname thing.. i will get around to reverting that.. (when orignally making diff on old branch change was not there) |
| 21:25.07 | snuff-work | i just noticed i still have a few whitespace issues there.. and bad ref counts.. ;) |
| 21:28.17 | snuff-work | atm i'm trying to figure out why i would segfault at module unload when it 'seems' to reach right number of ref's..0.. |
| 21:37.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev telecos (n=sergio@38.166.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) |
| 21:48.16 | putnopvut | snuff-work: thanks for following up. I'll look to see if I can find that info out, too. |
| 22:11.27 | snuff-work | np.. if u want to see the crash just uncomment the buddy ref in the module_unload |
| 22:11.53 | snuff-work | looking @ the utils/refcount output i seem to be 'closer' now |
| 22:21.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-11341e61e30fef0a) |
| 22:32.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-b844755e5553b1ef) |
| 22:46.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mosty (n=mosty@eth1426.vic.adsl.internode.on.net) |
| 23:24.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (n=davidvos@74-47-21-87.dsl1.ckvl.tn.frontiernet.net) |
| 23:27.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.34.1) |
| 23:27.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 23:27.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 23:36.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev obnauticus (n=lol@about/windows/regular/obnauticus) |
| 23:54.41 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=Deeewayn@nat/digium/x-4c02d21bba67dd54) |