| 00:38.55 | wildzero-cw | hello, the "p->dialing == 1; in chan_dahdi, but DAHDI/1-1 is answered" issue is in relation with: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13034 without the: "patch_trunk_183progress_klaus3000.txt" i get audio from between chan_sip<->chan_dahdi<->libpri_nt_ptmp<->isdn_device |
| 00:43.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _charly_ (i=kroseneg@sunrise.schmidham.net) |
| 00:54.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtodd (i=d7usr99d@ns.fox-den.com) |
| 00:54.41 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jtodd] by ChanServ |
| 01:28.07 | philipp64 | tzafrir_laptop: you there? |
| 01:28.13 | tzafrir_laptop | yes |
| 01:28.28 | philipp64 | is it debian that went to eglibc? |
| 01:29.26 | philipp64 | hmmm. guess so. that's what www.eglibc.org says. so they haven't done it yet? |
| 01:29.31 | philipp64 | a work in progress? |
| 01:30.52 | philipp64 | I'm wondering what the pain and suffering will be like making the switch over for astlinux. |
| 01:31.07 | philipp64 | especially since it will probably be me that ends up doing it. |
| 01:31.14 | philipp64 | we're a little short-handed these days. |
| 01:35.04 | tzafrir_laptop | eglibc is a fork of glibc more in the meaning of a branch |
| 01:35.32 | tzafrir_laptop | heck, glibc, in a completely unrelated move, moved to git :-) |
| 01:36.08 | tzafrir_laptop | quite a few of the patches in the diff between eglibc and glibc are patches Debian had to apply anyway |
| 01:45.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Psychobilly (n=moi@adsl282-9.kln.forthnet.gr) |
| 01:45.46 | Psychobilly | hello since i didnt get any answer in #asterisk about a prob lem i have with my ael code can i ask here? :) |
| 01:47.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (n=eliels@120-17-235-201.fibertel.com.ar) |
| 01:47.06 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 01:47.47 | Psychobilly | pls im desperate :) |
| 02:05.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=dwayne@76.29.245.9) |
| 02:05.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 02:05.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@CPE001cdfec4cee-CM00080dab8485.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 02:14.16 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev by Qwell -> Topic for #asterisk-dev is: Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- ViewVC for SVN is currently down for the forseeable future -=- Never bowl against twilson or rmudgett for money. |
| 02:26.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 02:26.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 02:28.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant1 (n=brett@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 02:28.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant1] by ChanServ |
| 02:40.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=CunningP@216.231.52.133) |
| 03:03.57 | seanbright | anyone around? |
| 03:19.17 | moy | hey seanbright |
| 03:27.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip68-103-153-140.ks.ok.cox.net) |
| 03:32.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 03:32.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 03:32.49 | moy | I need to commit a small fix to the R2 code in 1.6.2, should I commit first to 1.6.2 branch and then use merge4trunk? |
| 03:33.15 | Qwell | moy: does it apply to trunk too? |
| 03:33.20 | moy | yep |
| 03:33.37 | Qwell | trunk first, then mergetrunk6 |
| 03:33.46 | moy | ah, got it |
| 03:34.06 | moy | Qwell: thanks! |
| 03:34.09 | Qwell | 1.4>trunk, trunk>1.6.0 (if it applies), trunk>1.6.1 (if it applies), trunk>1.6.2 |
| 03:34.18 | Qwell | all done separately, as needed |
| 03:37.57 | leifmadsen | yo |
| 03:43.38 | snuff-home | Qwell: i'm guessing u lost bowling.. |
| 03:43.48 | Qwell | snuff-home: that would be an understatement. |
| 03:43.49 | leifmadsen | sounds right :) |
| 03:43.59 | Qwell | we got thoroughly owned. |
| 03:44.05 | leifmadsen | we? |
| 03:44.10 | leifmadsen | who pwned? |
| 03:44.14 | Qwell | 9 of us went tonight. |
| 03:44.17 | Qwell | leifmadsen: /topic |
| 03:44.51 | leifmadsen | lol |
| 03:44.52 | leifmadsen | nice |
| 03:45.00 | leifmadsen | 10 or 5 pin? |
| 03:45.10 | Qwell | 10 |
| 03:45.14 | Qwell | never heard of 5-pin |
| 03:45.20 | leifmadsen | really?! |
| 03:45.23 | leifmadsen | no wonder you lost |
| 03:45.26 | Qwell | heh |
| 03:45.36 | snuff-home | 5 pin sounds like drunken bowling.. where 10 blurs into 5.. |
| 03:45.38 | leifmadsen | 5 pin has smaller bowling balls |
| 03:45.40 | Qwell | twilson managed to master the steveramjet style of bowling |
| 03:45.48 | Qwell | stevie* |
| 03:45.49 | leifmadsen | which is? |
| 03:45.57 | Qwell | crazy spin/hook |
| 03:46.22 | leifmadsen | ah gotcha |
| 03:46.24 | snuff-home | u mean like wii bowling style? ;) |
| 03:46.29 | Qwell | snuff-home: exactly! |
| 03:46.40 | leifmadsen | I have a pretty good spin with 5 pin. Been a while for 10 pin |
| 03:46.50 | Qwell | putnopvut got some pretty crazy reverse spin on one shot... |
| 03:46.53 | leifmadsen | I can spin it both ways too so it curls to the left or right |
| 03:46.58 | seanbright | 5 pin? |
| 03:47.01 | seanbright | you mean duck pin. |
| 03:47.07 | seanbright | invented in the great state of maryland |
| 03:47.11 | leifmadsen | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-pin_bowling |
| 03:47.32 | leifmadsen | wow, apparently it is a canadian thing |
| 03:47.42 | seanbright | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckpin_bowling |
| 03:47.45 | seanbright | cooler |
| 03:47.55 | seanbright | cuz it's from the US of A |
| 03:48.09 | leifmadsen | actually... invented in Toronto, Ontario |
| 03:48.19 | leifmadsen | 5-pin anyways :) |
| 03:48.56 | seanbright | oh |
| 03:49.01 | seanbright | and there are only 5 pins |
| 03:49.02 | seanbright | weird. |
| 03:49.10 | seanbright | damn hippies |
| 03:49.11 | leifmadsen | ya |
| 03:49.12 | leifmadsen | lol |
| 03:49.26 | leifmadsen | each pin has a different amount |
| 03:49.48 | leifmadsen | back corner are 2 pts, inner pins 3 pts, centre 5 pts |
| 03:50.12 | seanbright | cool |
| 03:52.03 | leifmadsen | it's pretty fun |
| 03:52.08 | leifmadsen | usually you drink heavily when playing |
| 03:52.24 | leifmadsen | btw... the USD *SUX* |
| 03:52.26 | leifmadsen | hard. |
| 03:52.41 | seanbright | thanks |
| 03:52.42 | leifmadsen | down 11 cents to the CAD in the last month |
| 03:53.02 | leifmadsen | gonna be back to CAD worth more than USD in another month at this rate |
| 03:53.12 | seanbright | god forbid |
| 03:53.13 | leifmadsen | wants the USD to be worth lots |
| 03:54.23 | leifmadsen | http://www.x-rates.com/d/CAD/USD/graph120.html |
| 03:54.40 | seanbright | that's depressing |
| 03:55.34 | leifmadsen | no kidding |
| 03:55.40 | seanbright | and on that note |
| 03:55.41 | seanbright | i rest. |
| 03:56.21 | leifmadsen | I might as well go do something productive like read some more Pro Drupal Development, or go to bed |
| 04:15.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=bbryant@c-68-59-20-153.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 04:15.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 04:42.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jetsnoc (n=brian@dsl-75-010.twf.pmt.org) |
| 04:59.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.36.12) |
| 05:09.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176) |
| 05:26.38 | moy | Qwell: the property changes in . when using mergetrunk6 are normal? |
| 05:27.21 | Qwell | moy: `svn diff -N .` - does it show what property is changing? |
| 05:27.39 | Qwell | trunk-merged I think is the one it would change |
| 05:28.03 | moy | ah ok, yes, that is the one |
| 05:28.22 | Qwell | if it's changing anything else, it's bad |
| 05:36.31 | moy | Qwell: when should I block a change? for example, do I need to block this change I did for 1.6.1 and 1.6.0 since there is no R2 support on those branches? |
| 05:36.54 | Qwell | I think changes are only being blocked in the latest branch |
| 05:37.10 | Qwell | so like a new feature in trunk would be blocked in 1.6.2 |
| 05:37.40 | moy | ah, I see, then I missunderstood http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2009-March/037221.html .. says something about 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 |
| 05:38.13 | Qwell | you may be reading it correctly |
| 05:38.30 | Qwell | I mean, it won't hurt to block in a branch. |
| 05:50.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wubbla (n=wubbla@212-183-38-23.adsl.highway.telekom.at) |
| 05:50.05 | wubbla | hi! |
| 05:52.38 | wubbla | anyone here familiar with the SNOM-call-pickup code in asterisk-trunk? |
| 06:26.11 | wubbla | can i somehow access the "masqueraded" extensions of a multiple extensions hint (exten => group,hint,SIP/1&SIP/2&SIP/3) chan_sip.c:transmit_state_notify() |
| 06:27.49 | wubbla | so for example in transmit_state_notify(struct sip_pvt *p, ...): i can access the masqueraded extension ("group") via p->exten |
| 06:29.09 | wubbla | sadly, what i acutally need to have are the masqueraded extensions (SIP/1&SIP/2&SIP/3)... |
| 06:29.26 | wubbla | how can i do this? |
| 06:29.27 | wubbla | any ideas? |
| 07:38.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@bzq-179-75-202.static.bezeqint.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:38.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _charly_ (i=kroseneg@sunrise.schmidham.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:38.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev denon (i=denon@synapse.subneural.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:38.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by irc.freenode.net |
| 10:16.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Errotan (n=Errotan@5403E7BF.catv.pool.telekom.hu) |
| 11:50.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.165.33) |
| 12:29.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_lap (n=atis_lap@195.13.166.253) |
| 12:29.15 | atis_lap | anybody with commit access around? |
| 12:29.30 | atis_lap | i found tiny documentation bug |
| 13:15.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 13:15.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 13:28.42 | atis_lap | kpfleming: ping |
| 13:29.01 | kpfleming | who is talking to me? eh? eh? |
| 13:29.21 | atis_lap | hehe.. you're the only one dev online |
| 13:29.45 | atis_lap | kpfleming: i found tiny bug in comment doc for ast_cli_complete |
| 13:29.59 | atis_lap | cli.h |
| 13:30.03 | kpfleming | i'm not really online |
| 13:30.10 | kpfleming | it's 08:30 on saturday |
| 13:30.12 | atis_lap | hehe |
| 13:30.21 | atis_lap | const choices = { "one" ... |
| 13:30.25 | atis_lap | it should be |
| 13:30.30 | atis_lap | choices[] = ... |
| 13:30.36 | atis_lap | or you get compiler warning |
| 13:30.38 | kpfleming | what branch |
| 13:30.40 | kpfleming | trunk? |
| 13:30.42 | atis_lap | trunk |
| 13:30.58 | kpfleming | will fix, one second |
| 13:31.13 | atis_lap | good :) |
| 13:31.22 | atis_lap | this seems too small to create an issue :D |
| 13:31.58 | kpfleming | fixed |
| 13:32.58 | atis_lap | thanks :) |
| 13:48.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Greek-B0y (n=greek@41.222.89.77) |
| 13:50.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:50.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 13:54.12 | leifmadsen | yo |
| 14:07.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wubbla (n=wubbla@213-33-2-174.adsl.highway.telekom.at) |
| 14:21.14 | kpfleming | leifmadsen: oy! |
| 14:22.27 | file | falls over |
| 14:41.33 | seanbright | am i right in thinking that with the new channel refcounting stuff, creating 'dummy' ast_channel structs and passing those into the core is going to result in disaster? |
| 14:41.45 | seanbright | and by 'dummy' ast_channel structs i mean: |
| 14:41.51 | seanbright | struct ast_channel dummy; |
| 14:41.58 | seanbright | dummy.wahtever = whatever; |
| 14:46.19 | seanbright | yes. yes that is bad. because calling ast_channel_lock on a bare ast_channel will result in ao2 trying to lock a non-ao2 object. |
| 14:46.23 | seanbright | i like answering my own questions. |
| 14:46.26 | file | that would have been bad anyway since it wouldn't have been properly initialized |
| 14:46.35 | file | (pre astobj2 channel days) |
| 14:46.50 | file | depending on what you are actually passing the channel to at least |
| 14:47.15 | seanbright | substitute_vars and friends |
| 14:47.20 | seanbright | that is what cdr_custom does |
| 14:47.58 | seanbright | but doing "${CDR(clid)}" is fine, since that never locks the channel |
| 14:48.06 | seanbright | doing "${EPOCH}" does |
| 14:48.10 | seanbright | which is where i'm seeing the issue |
| 14:48.25 | file | nods |
| 14:48.53 | file | I have a sneaking feeling there's a way to do the sub without the channel, but I can't remember how |
| 14:52.31 | seanbright | that would be easier |
| 14:52.37 | seanbright | but ast_channel_alloc'ing feels safer |
| 15:01.49 | seanbright | something is leaking ao2 refs, too. just not sure where. |
| 15:05.52 | seanbright | file: if you have a few minutes, could you take a glance at http://pastie.org/private/ksj5vmywvqfyqwrybpk5a and let me know if you see something glaringly wrong? if not, no biggie. |
| 15:06.07 | seanbright | it's only 49 lines |
| 15:06.48 | file | nothing off the top of mon tette |
| 15:06.49 | kpfleming | they could be looooong lines |
| 15:07.11 | seanbright | is the lock necessary? |
| 15:07.25 | file | kpfleming: 4 hours 53 minutes |
| 15:07.27 | seanbright | i'm alloc'ing and releasing the channel in the same function |
| 15:07.49 | kpfleming | file: eh? |
| 15:08.07 | kpfleming | seanbright: are you handing the channel pointer to any other threads? if not, no, the lock is not needed |
| 15:08.08 | file | kpfleming: they countered me! |
| 15:08.14 | kpfleming | crud |
| 15:08.36 | seanbright | kpfleming: i am not. but it will be in the global channel list, right? |
| 15:08.52 | kpfleming | i suppose so |
| 15:09.15 | file | nothing will actually get it though and try to muck with the contents |
| 15:09.31 | seanbright | good point. |
| 15:09.34 | seanbright | ok, thanks fellas :) |
| 15:18.53 | seanbright | that was fun. |
| 16:11.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 16:11.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 16:34.59 | leifmadsen | kpfleming: oy! :) |
| 16:50.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=CunningP@216.231.52.133) |
| 17:31.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtodd (i=a6r0rbei@ns.fox-den.com) |
| 17:31.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jtodd] by ChanServ |
| 18:17.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 19:15.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 19:30.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (n=eliels@120-17-235-201.fibertel.com.ar) |
| 19:30.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 22:03.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jthurman42 (n=jthurman@c-67-169-218-181.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 22:13.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jthurman42 (n=jthurman@c-67-169-218-181.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 22:24.03 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Errotan (n=Errotan@5403E7BF.catv.pool.telekom.hu) |
| 22:31.56 | jthurman42 | Is there are generic server routine for UDP like there is for TCP/TLS (tcptls.c)? |