| 01:22.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Sipster (~Sipster@modemcable045.5-200-24.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 02:24.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drclue (~drclue@ip-65-49-163-54.wireless.dyn.beamspeed.net) |
| 02:39.18 | *** part/#asterisk-dev drclue (~drclue@ip-65-49-163-54.wireless.dyn.beamspeed.net) |
| 05:56.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mboehn (mathias@2001:470:dc99:dc99::aaaa) |
| 06:17.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Sipster (~Sipster@modemcable045.5-200-24.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 07:07.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:07.51 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 07:10.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@228.Red-88-9-110.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 07:18.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 07:33.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@buero-gw.dortmund.loca.net) |
| 07:43.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev MuffinMan (~muffinman@asterisk/issue-tracker-bot/muffinman) |
| 08:58.26 | tzafrir | mvanbaak, here? |
| 10:44.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 10:44.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:00.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev akshayb (~akshay@140.203.214.142) |
| 11:04.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ccesario (~ccesario@189-29-60-113-ac.cpe.vivax.com.br) |
| 11:04.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@228.Red-88-9-110.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hc_e (~hc@pdpc/supporter/active/hc-e) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmworx (~jeval@mail.octasic.com) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (~michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jerome` (~jerome@atom.dedwen.info) |
| 11:09.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mbranca (~matteo@host139-217-static.224-95-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 11:09.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by niven.freenode.net |
| 12:16.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (~ugelt@reserved-225136.rol.raiffeisen.net) |
| 12:41.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 12:44.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ccesario (~ccesario@189-29-60-113-ac.cpe.vivax.com.br) |
| 13:14.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 13:14.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 13:22.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 13:25.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@yoda.kanatek.com) |
| 13:35.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 13:35.39 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 13:35.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 13:38.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hugorebelo (~hugo@200-171-132-124.completo.com.br) |
| 13:41.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (~eliels@201.234.94.226) |
| 13:41.28 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 13:42.58 | rrb3942 | is their a particular reason that the AGI manager command uses a 'CommandID' instead of an 'ActionID'? |
| 13:43.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@147.Red-88-24-188.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 13:43.46 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: thanks for the review |
| 13:43.55 | pabelanger | rrb3942: Example? |
| 13:44.43 | rrb3942 | just looking at the documentation for it and it lists a 'CommandID', and looking in the patch that implemented it I do not see an ActionID |
| 13:45.47 | rrb3942 | https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.php?file_id=16826&type=bug was the patch it looks like |
| 13:45.59 | rrb3942 | err whoops wrong one |
| 13:46.26 | rrb3942 | https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.php?file_id=16865&type=bug |
| 13:47.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 13:50.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@yoda.kanatek.com) |
| 13:51.58 | rrb3942 | pableanger: the asterisk doc lists a 'CommandID' for it, and looking at the patch that implemented it, it seems to lack reference to an ActionID |
| 13:52.03 | rrb3942 | https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.php?file_id=16865&type=bug |
| 13:52.32 | pabelanger | rrb3942: which issue is the patch from? |
| 13:52.41 | rrb3942 | 11282 |
| 13:53.57 | pabelanger | rrb3942: Not sure, is an old patch though. 18+ months |
| 13:54.53 | pabelanger | rrb3942: Looks to be only 1 instance of CommandID in asterisk source. |
| 13:55.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@UNVLON55-1176057127.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 13:57.18 | rrb3942 | pableanger: yeah this command looks like it could use a little work, no actionids are being used and all responses require you have 'agi' events on |
| 13:57.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 13:57.38 | pabelanger | rrb3942: patches welcome :) |
| 13:58.22 | rrb3942 | i will try, not to good at c, and don't play with agi much either :) |
| 13:59.48 | pabelanger | rrb3942: I would agree however, some corners of AMI are not well documented, and not consistent across modules. |
| 14:02.53 | rrb3942 | pableanger: yeah, i have posted a few small patches to try to make things consistent. I just get wary whenever it involves changing more than a few lines of code |
| 14:04.35 | pabelanger | rrb3942: Main problem is, we cannot make drastic changes to AMI, as we will break alot of application. baby steps |
| 14:05.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:05.51 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:09.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 14:09.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 14:12.17 | rrb3942 | pabledanger: yep I understand the problem, doesn't mean it shouldn't get fixed eventually though. Having consistency and documentation helps with new users and those of use trying to provide libraries for working with asterisk. I think this warrants an issue on the tracker at least, and I may take a stab a patch later. |
| 14:16.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (~jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 14:16.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 14:18.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 14:18.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 14:43.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@h-68-167-124-171.cmbrmaor.static.covad.net) |
| 14:44.10 | eliel | The _softhangup value is exclusive if AST_SOFTHANGUP_DEV is set, then AST_SOFTHANGUP_TIMEOUT can't be? |
| 14:45.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@95.122.8.54) |
| 15:02.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:02.37 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:03.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:03.47 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:37.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev akshayb (4d4b6192@gateway/web/freenode/ip.77.75.97.146) |
| 15:39.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 16:45.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 16:56.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev minaguib (~mina@modemcable109.56-20-96.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 16:57.30 | minaguib | Hi folks. I have a few Nortel I2002 phones talking to asterisk using chan_unistim. They work very well, however they have display issues since chan_unistim assumes the device has 3 lines whereas these phones only have 1 |
| 16:57.48 | minaguib | I modified chan_unistim to add support for specifying "height" per device, and it works well |
| 16:58.02 | minaguib | How can I contribute this back upstream ? |
| 16:58.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Gary_B (~IceChat7@85.211.169.212) |
| 16:58.48 | minaguib | (mods did on an asterisk svn checkout of trunk) |
| 16:59.03 | Gary_B | are the newer versions of Q.931 fully backwards compatible? |
| 16:59.20 | Gary_B | that is the 2002 / 2003 versions |
| 16:59.37 | Gary_B | to use with equipment configured with the original |
| 17:05.23 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: ping |
| 17:06.22 | Corydon76-dig | pong |
| 17:06.44 | Gary_B | anyone got any ideas on my q? |
| 17:07.23 | Corydon76-dig | Gary_B: they're merely clarifications of the standard, to deal with outright errors and ambiguities |
| 17:07.58 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: the cid_ton is made of two values? it is technology independent? |
| 17:08.41 | Corydon76-dig | cid_ton is not |
| 17:08.48 | Corydon76-dig | it's an enum |
| 17:08.49 | eliel | lol |
| 17:09.12 | eliel | but it is not defined in channel.h |
| 17:09.15 | Corydon76-dig | sip lastmsgssent is two values, though |
| 17:09.30 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: yes, already removed that, based on your comments |
| 17:09.31 | Corydon76-dig | No, the values are defined in libpri.h |
| 17:09.39 | eliel | ok, i will check that |
| 17:09.40 | eliel | thanks |
| 17:10.04 | Corydon76-dig | PRI_TON_* |
| 17:11.19 | eliel | i also think it is defined in chan_misdn |
| 17:11.43 | Gary_B | my boss asked the telecom was our ISDN lines Q.931, he though they said it was Q.931 V0.8, i took this to be V1998, planning to put a dial through gateway on the trunk which im thinking will deliver the newest standard to rest of the setup, and wandering will equipment need reconfigured |
| 17:11.46 | Corydon76-dig | Probably is |
| 17:12.24 | eliel | and one question more, _softhangup is an enum, or it is a group of flags? |
| 17:12.29 | Corydon76-dig | Gary_B: very unlikely. I don't know of any equipment that says it's to one version of the standard but not another |
| 17:12.49 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: good point... it's a group of flags... |
| 17:14.11 | Gary_B | @Corydon76-dig: do you see any reason a call recorder which taps into the trunk lines (Mercom) should be different |
| 17:14.26 | Corydon76-dig | Had another thought while I was reviewing yesterday. Eventually, when we implement PUT, we'll need to mark certain fields as read-only |
| 17:14.42 | Corydon76-dig | Gary_B: No, I don't |
| 17:14.59 | Gary_B | Thanks very much for this help! |
| 17:15.05 | Gary_B | Enjoy! |
| 17:15.15 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: either because they are derived values or because altering them doesn't make sense |
| 17:15.15 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Gary_B (~IceChat7@85.211.169.212) |
| 17:16.20 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: yes in gsoc 2009 we already though that, and russell told me to avoid thinking about the PUT api at the moment, but i think we will need to add a new parameter to each structure member to mark them as read, or read write |
| 17:17.12 | Corydon76-dig | Cool |
| 17:17.24 | tzafrir_laptop | "write" basically triggers an action, right? |
| 17:17.37 | tzafrir_laptop | If so, write-only may also be useful |
| 17:18.14 | tzafrir_laptop | ("reset statistics") |
| 17:18.34 | Corydon76-dig | tzafrir_laptop: I doubt we'd do that through this interface, though |
| 17:18.58 | Corydon76-dig | Dunno, maybe |
| 17:19.27 | Corydon76-dig | There's no harm in setting an additional type, even if it's left unused, though |
| 17:24.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@83.39.70.194) |
| 17:25.46 | eliel | gsoc 2011 maybe? |
| 17:25.49 | eliel | he |
| 17:47.01 | Corydon76-dig | Right, for Asterisk 1.10 |
| 17:50.00 | minaguib | What does "License PENDING (v3.0)" mean on my ticket+patch I submitted ? |
| 17:50.26 | minaguib | I already went through the "license" and signed it in the top menu and it's no longer there |
| 17:50.55 | minaguib | (this in reference to https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17600 ) |
| 17:51.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@95.122.8.54) |
| 17:53.51 | jsmith | minaguib: As I understand it, each signed license has to be checked by a human |
| 17:54.01 | jsmith | minaguib: (To make sure it wasn't signed by "Mickey Mouse", for example) |
| 18:00.49 | minaguib | I see. Thanks. |
| 18:01.34 | Kobaz | allrightey |
| 18:01.47 | Kobaz | sooo... i have 10 channels that refuse to hang up |
| 18:01.51 | Kobaz | how should i debug |
| 18:01.58 | Kobaz | i do have debug threads enabled |
| 18:02.23 | Kobaz | they are all suck on AGI()... and the agi process has ended |
| 18:13.14 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: we will only have the description of the enum cid_ton if libpri is installed (to include libpri.h) |
| 18:13.46 | Corydon76-dig | Why? |
| 18:14.14 | Corydon76-dig | I wasn't aware that the text was even available |
| 18:14.57 | Corydon76-dig | They are just constants, and they should equally apply if e.g. libss7 was in use without libpri |
| 18:15.09 | pabelanger | Q: Did Digium create a Dialogic channel driver for ABE? |
| 18:15.29 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger: yes, but due to licenses, it has to remain closed source |
| 18:16.08 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger: IIRC, the license fee to use the Dialogic license is equal to the cost of buying a new Digium card |
| 18:16.24 | pabelanger | Corydon76-dig: Are people able to buy it from Digium, like SFA? |
| 18:16.40 | pabelanger | Corydon76-dig: Ya, would not surprise me the cost |
| 18:16.46 | kpfleming | go look at the Dialog Diastar stuff... they have ways to use Dialogic cards with Asterisk now (via chan_woomera) |
| 18:16.50 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger: it only works in extremely limited circumstances |
| 18:17.42 | pabelanger | Was more curious then anything. Seen a few threads about it on lists |
| 18:17.53 | pabelanger | Didn't realize Digium created one |
| 18:18.05 | kpfleming | point them at Diastar... that's the only Dialogic-supported way of using their cards with Asterisk now |
| 18:18.09 | Corydon76-dig | The cost of the Dialogic license is the main reason why it was shelved |
| 18:18.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev akshayb (4d4b6192@gateway/web/freenode/ip.77.75.97.146) |
| 18:18.51 | Corydon76-dig | Plus, we don't really sell software like that without support, and we cannot support it |
| 18:19.40 | Corydon76-dig | It would cost more to get a support tech up to speed on it than we could ever hope to derive from something that costs that much |
| 18:19.59 | kpfleming | Corydon76-dig: point has been made... move on :-) |
| 18:20.06 | Corydon76-dig | Heh |
| 18:20.29 | Corydon76-dig | kpfleming: is the horse dead yet? |
| 18:20.40 | kpfleming | it's an aardvark, actually, and yes |
| 18:20.52 | file | resurrects it |
| 18:21.05 | kpfleming | do you have a +10 wand of resurrection? |
| 18:21.28 | putnopvut | Fact: "aardvark" is one of the few English language words derived from Afrikaans. |
| 18:21.44 | kpfleming | what about Afrikaans? |
| 18:22.10 | putnopvut | The word itself? Probably from Dutch |
| 18:22.38 | kpfleming | yeah, that would make sense |
| 18:24.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev iscario (~quassel@24.244.71-86.rev.gaoland.net) |
| 18:31.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~me@c-98-248-105-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 18:36.06 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: well, i can define them again in channel.h and avoid using libpri |
| 18:36.22 | eliel | but to get the definition of each PRI_TON_* i need to include libpri |
| 18:36.30 | eliel | and to do it, it must be installed |
| 18:36.40 | putnopvut | I added a debug level 0 message to some code and then ran Asterisk with debug and verbosity at 0. The debug message did not print. If I turn either the verbosity or the debug level up to 1, then the message appears. Is this by design? |
| 18:37.10 | kpfleming | unfortunately it is, yes |
| 18:37.20 | kpfleming | no debug messages appear unless verbose >= 1 |
| 18:37.26 | putnopvut | Okay, it seemed vastly unintuitive that I had to have verbosity on to see a debug message. |
| 18:37.37 | kpfleming | it is indeed |
| 18:38.00 | kpfleming | but i suspect if we changed it, there would be a lot of debug messages that would start appearing because their levels are too low |
| 18:38.35 | putnopvut | We could make a dev-mode only change. |
| 19:12.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~me@c-98-248-105-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 19:21.42 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: to avoid including libpri in channel.c i will have to do something like this: http://pastebin.com/AN0THaU2 |
| 19:31.38 | Corydon76-dig | eliel: If you want, you can lose the defines and wrap the whole thing in a HAVE_LIBPRI or whatever the definition is |
| 19:31.58 | Corydon76-dig | I misunderstood what you were going to do |
| 19:32.14 | eliel | Corydon76-dig: ok! will do that and avoid duplicating this |
| 19:47.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jacke (jacke@valhalla.bofh.org) |
| 19:51.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 19:51.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 19:53.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 19:53.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 20:01.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 20:06.05 | *** part/#asterisk-dev iscario (~quassel@24.244.71-86.rev.gaoland.net) |
| 20:14.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982_ (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 20:32.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev diegomad (~mad@190.146.200.120) |
| 20:35.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 20:54.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@h-68-167-124-171.cmbrmaor.static.covad.net) |
| 20:54.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 21:06.53 | pabelanger | eliel: ping? |
| 21:07.05 | eliel | pong |
| 21:07.31 | pabelanger | eliel: Any documentation about your GSOC2010 branch? I'm going to try and play with it tonight |
| 21:08.09 | eliel | there is a branch data_api_providers_gsoc2010 in my team/eliel branch |
| 21:08.53 | pabelanger | eliel: Ya, already grabbed that :) |
| 21:09.13 | pabelanger | *CLI> data get ... right? |
| 21:13.00 | eliel | yes, it is one of the ways to access it |
| 21:13.13 | eliel | if you have colours in the CLI you will get a fancy output |
| 21:18.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@Paawc.gbis.com) |
| 21:49.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jacke (jacke@valhalla.bofh.org) |
| 21:59.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jacke (jacke@valhalla.bofh.org) |
| 22:06.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mbranca (~matteo@host139-217-static.224-95-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 22:18.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@95.122.8.54) |
| 22:50.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev akshayb (4d4b6192@gateway/web/freenode/ip.77.75.97.146) |