| 00:59.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.39.243) |
| 02:10.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev joshaidan_ (~brianj@24.109.210.41) |
| 02:31.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@71-34-110-194.ptld.qwest.net) |
| 03:58.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 06:16.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@lmlo.sil.at) |
| 06:16.52 | schmidts | good morning |
| 06:59.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 07:13.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@163.117.211.10) |
| 07:27.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@91.183.59.105) |
| 07:27.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:00.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@buero-gw.dortmund.loca.net) |
| 09:04.32 | schmidts | oej thanks for your suggestions |
| 09:05.42 | oej | Schmidts: No problem :-) |
| 09:05.56 | oej | Since I'm often teaching this stuff, I want to have clarity and not confuse people. |
| 09:06.10 | oej | They're often confused enough when getting to know asterisk. |
| 09:06.10 | oej | ;-) |
| 09:06.10 | schmidts | :D |
| 09:06.15 | schmidts | thats true! |
| 09:06.59 | schmidts | i have taken a short look at chan_iax2.c to see if something like a dump dialogs exists there allready but i have to say i dont know iax much so iam not sure how to implement something like iax2 show pvts |
| 09:09.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 09:31.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tiny_D (~tiny_D@mail.snom.com) |
| 09:36.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~Julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 10:18.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 10:18.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 11:09.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@163.117.211.10) |
| 11:21.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 11:21.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 11:24.24 | schmidts | hello leif |
| 11:25.24 | schmidts | leifmadsen do you have an idea how could know how asterisk should act like described in issue 15994 |
| 11:25.26 | MuffinMan | [acknowledged] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/Transfers 0015994: Wrong handling of INVITE with Diversion tag when Asterisk has seen the callid before reported by orn https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15994 |
| 11:31.10 | leifmadsen | schmidts: I'll have to look at it in a bit, but nothing comes to mind immediately, but I also probably don't understand the Diversion tag well enough |
| 11:32.29 | schmidts | as far as i have understood this rfc 5806 the diversion header should be added on a 302 package and could also be possible on a forwarded response |
| 11:32.52 | schmidts | in this case a proxy forward the response back to asterisk |
| 11:33.41 | leifmadsen | does this mean we're in a spiraling situation? |
| 11:34.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:34.48 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:34.50 | schmidts | yes |
| 11:35.31 | schmidts | but i am not sure if kamilio does it right |
| 11:37.28 | leifmadsen | ya, that'd be a good question for someone a bit more familiar with the intricacies of SIP I suppose |
| 11:37.41 | leifmadsen | at least to make sure the SIP msging is right, then to determine if Asterisk is doing the right thing for the situation |
| 11:47.07 | schmidts | as i have written in the issue, i have asked klaus darillion about this and he means that asterisk should tread every incoming invite as a new call but i am not sure about this |
| 11:47.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 11:51.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@2607:f2c0:a000:166:218:f3ff:fe51:c71) |
| 11:57.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:57.53 | leifmadsen | schmidts: I think in general, that is typically what Asterisk does |
| 11:58.22 | leifmadsen | but that is just from observing, and not necessarily from any particular or reasonable knowledge :) |
| 12:04.39 | kpfleming | no, not every INVITE is a new call |
| 12:07.13 | schmidts | it should not be for example a retransmit |
| 12:07.26 | kpfleming | or a re-INVITE |
| 12:31.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 12:31.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 12:33.48 | schmidts | ok there is new info to this issue |
| 12:34.29 | schmidts | with 1.8 this works as expected cause 1.8 does a diversion check to an incoming invite (as response) too not only if its an request |
| 12:34.49 | leifmadsen | yay 1.8?! |
| 12:35.27 | schmidts | 1.8.0.rc2 |
| 12:35.49 | schmidts | the question is, is this a bug which should be solved in 1.6.2 too or not ;) |
| 12:36.39 | kpfleming | no. the decision was made not to do that in previous releases, because it's very invasive, and the cost (CPU time) to do the checking required changing around structures |
| 12:37.06 | kpfleming | when you are using 1.6.2, have you set 'pedantic' on? |
| 12:37.58 | schmidts | i havent tried this by myself, the reporter said it works with 1.8 but i can ask him to test it with pedantic |
| 12:38.25 | kpfleming | 1.8 has pedantic on by default, and pedantic is required to distinguish forked incoming requests |
| 12:39.01 | schmidts | ok i see, could be the reason why this works with 1.8 |
| 12:39.09 | kpfleming | yes |
| 12:39.40 | kpfleming | it's the reason why the default was changed in 1.8, because it's no longer as much of a performance burden as it used to be |
| 12:40.53 | schmidts | ok |
| 12:43.25 | schmidts | i have asked the reporter to test this with pedantic=no on 1.8 if its reproducable and with pedantic=yes in 1.6.2 to solve this |
| 12:43.31 | schmidts | thank you kevin! |
| 12:43.36 | kpfleming | very welcome |
| 12:45.01 | leifmadsen | schmidts: which issue is that? Sounds like we could close it after the reporter has responded. Do you have the ability to close issues? |
| 12:46.05 | schmidts | issue 15994 and i am not allowed to close them, only to change to new ;) |
| 12:46.07 | MuffinMan | [acknowledged] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/Transfers 0015994: Wrong handling of INVITE with Diversion tag when Asterisk has seen the callid before reported by orn https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15994 |
| 12:46.09 | leifmadsen | schmidts: I just upgraded you to 'manager' in mantis so you have the ability to close issues now |
| 12:46.22 | schmidts | thank you ;) |
| 12:46.53 | leifmadsen | schmidts: I've just made you a bug marshal :) if you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask. Also, all issues marked as "New" please leave that way instead of moving to another status so that I can triage them. |
| 12:47.08 | leifmadsen | You're welcome to still comment on them of course |
| 12:47.29 | leifmadsen | (New issues get triaged by me and imported into our tracking software so they can be assigned to developers) |
| 12:47.39 | schmidts | ok i wont touch the status ;) |
| 12:47.52 | leifmadsen | once they are out of New you're welcome to change them as appropriate though |
| 12:48.01 | leifmadsen | i.e. set to feedback, acknowledged, ready for testing, etc |
| 12:48.04 | file | returns leifmadsen to the 'New' status |
| 12:48.15 | leifmadsen | returns file to the 'Nub' status |
| 12:48.23 | schmidts | ok got it |
| 12:48.38 | leifmadsen | thanks for the help! |
| 12:48.51 | schmidts | np ;) |
| 13:03.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 13:10.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev seanbright (~sean@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/seanbright) |
| 13:10.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o seanbright] by ChanServ |
| 13:18.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev crowbar7 (~JKLOBUCAR@12.2.84.2) |
| 13:34.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br) |
| 13:50.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 14:15.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (~dwayne@75-150-14-49-Atlanta.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 14:15.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 14:21.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev erinspice (~erin@207.98.195.107) |
| 14:32.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:32.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:34.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 14:34.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 15:03.05 | schmidts | kpfleming there is a response to the issue we talked before. in 1.8 with sip pedantic turned off it doesnt work, but in 1.6.2 with pedantic active it still doesnt work so only the change in 1.8 used with pedantic acitve solves this |
| 15:04.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-qtxwratgkrujubnn) |
| 15:05.46 | leifmadsen | schmidts: so it sounds like to me the issue could be closed as "Fixed in 1.8" |
| 15:09.22 | schmidts | ok thank you |
| 15:13.27 | schmidts | gtg cya all |
| 15:14.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:14.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:19.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 15:19.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Sipster (~Sipster@modemcable045.5-200-24.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 15:21.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 15:22.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:30.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:30.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 16:28.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 16:35.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 16:53.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 16:55.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 17:21.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@174.Red-88-13-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 17:35.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@UNVLON55-1176057127.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 17:43.18 | guilhermebr | I write a app module in 3 files. how to compile my module and the objects? Makefile only compile the app_ |
| 17:48.07 | Corydon76-home | See the example of chan_sip in channels/Makefile |
| 17:48.35 | Corydon76-home | Ditto for chan_iax2 and chan_dahdi |
| 17:54.04 | guilhermebr | Corydon76-home, tnks!! and sorry for dont see this before... |
| 18:26.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@71-34-110-194.ptld.qwest.net) |
| 19:05.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev niekvlessert (~niek@82-171-252-6.ip.telfort.nl) |
| 19:05.25 | *** part/#asterisk-dev niekvlessert (~niek@82-171-252-6.ip.telfort.nl) |
| 19:27.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk) |
| 19:52.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 19:52.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 19:58.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-klbmhqwijkhxiqri) |
| 20:04.31 | *** part/#asterisk-dev jmls (~Julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 20:12.05 | *** part/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-klbmhqwijkhxiqri) |
| 20:22.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev erinspice (~erin@207.98.195.107) |
| 20:25.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 21:23.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev w9sh (~chatzilla@adsl-068-209-117-205.sip.asm.bellsouth.net) |
| 21:31.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@2002:c037:40af:1234:fa1e:dfff:fedd:e05b) |
| 21:46.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cobolfoo (~cobolfoo@bas7-quebec14-1096764300.dsl.bell.ca) |
| 21:46.58 | cobolfoo | Hello, I have a TDM400p and when I monitor his sound level (with dahdi_monitor and friends) I saw a huge difference between strength between local speaker and remote speaker. There is a way to egalize it at ASTERISK / DAHDI level with some kind of AGC ? |
| 22:06.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@192.55.64.175) |