| 00:16.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.54.51) |
| 00:39.08 | *** part/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.54.51) |
| 00:49.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jaux (~jaux@70.26.52.191) |
| 01:26.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dharper (~dharper@ppp118-209-102-217.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net) |
| 01:57.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 01:57.48 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 05:05.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@c-67-170-173-27.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 05:36.56 | JunK-Y | with simon's help, is there any works done for iax in ipv6? |
| 07:28.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at) |
| 07:28.04 | schmidts | good morning |
| 07:49.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 07:49.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 08:01.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lftsy (~lftsy@194.38.160.117) |
| 08:07.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:903a:a2f0:c553:3f84) |
| 08:16.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:16.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 08:45.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 09:05.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@163.117.211.10) |
| 11:32.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 11:32.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 12:10.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guax (~guax@unaffiliated/guaxinim) |
| 12:13.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~Dovid@office.mypbxmanager.net) |
| 12:13.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br) |
| 12:13.56 | guax | any info about 17820? the issue was submited on august last year, patch approved but then forgotten. |
| 12:14.30 | WIMPy | M17820 |
| 12:19.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rgagnon (~rgagnon@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 12:19.51 | Marquis42 | guax: That's a pretty trivial patch. Once the Digiums guys pop into IRC I'll ask if I can just commit (i.e., no review) otherwise I'll put it up for review. |
| 12:21.12 | guax | Marquis42, thanks. |
| 12:21.46 | Marquis42 | No problem. I know those guys have tons on their plate, so knocking out a few issues here and there is the least I can do. |
| 12:21.56 | guax | Marquis42, if it helps we've been using it since the issue date and no problem appeared. |
| 12:22.42 | Marquis42 | Yes, having feedback about it working without issue is definitely helpful. I took a quick glance at the code and that's quite obviously the correct fix, so I don't think it will be an issue. |
| 12:25.02 | guax | :) |
| 12:25.07 | anonymouz666 | guax: good to know that exist people using chan_agent :-) |
| 12:25.48 | guax | anonymouz666, haha, you're alive! Im getting rid of it for the next version of our software. But until there i need to support it |
| 12:26.40 | anonymouz666 | there are things that only chan_agent can do |
| 12:28.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:28.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:28.44 | guax | well, i am actually getting rid of agentcallbacklogin not chan_agent. |
| 12:29.11 | guax | indeed the "online agent" is a feature i can't simulate easily |
| 12:29.37 | anonymouz666 | yeap that's what I am talking about |
| 12:34.38 | Dovid | is there any way of seeing if a channel still exists ? |
| 13:15.43 | JunK-Y | Dovid: core show channel chan_name |
| 13:16.51 | Dovid | Junk-Y: figured that out. seems my bug is still there :( |
| 13:16.59 | Dovid | Junk-Y: Are you a dev ? |
| 13:17.10 | file | what's the bug? |
| 13:17.51 | Dovid | file: look at my last note: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18722 |
| 13:18.06 | file | right. |
| 13:18.09 | file | I'll tell you why |
| 13:18.31 | file | a thread can normally only handle 1 channel at a time, which means if you use the gosub dial options or whatever when that channel is in there the other one has to go some place else |
| 13:18.45 | file | so it sorta gets suspended until the gosub execution is complete |
| 13:18.59 | Dovid | file: any way of "breaking it" |
| 13:19.05 | file | breaking what? |
| 13:19.14 | Dovid | so it dies paceefully |
| 13:19.27 | file | it will die peacefully, you just want it to die at the exact moment that it literally is hung up |
| 13:19.29 | Dovid | that if first leg hangs up even b4 gosub exits that it should die |
| 13:19.38 | Dovid | file: correct. |
| 13:19.59 | file | which you would have to write some sort of synchronization between the autoservice code (which is where the other channel is suspended in) and the code that is executing the gosub |
| 13:20.18 | Dovid | its what >>>I<<< want. i am not a dev. i want to pay one to do that for me. i understand the logic and why. question is if it can be "fixed" for me |
| 13:20.38 | file | or somehow relate the two channels so you can trigger a hangup on the other, which right now they are not related |
| 13:20.44 | Dovid | file: Don't know c which is why i am here, putting bountys on the list etc. |
| 13:20.52 | Dovid | file: exactly |
| 13:21.21 | WIMPy | Dovid: You could make it happen without changing Asterisk by doing it via AMI. |
| 13:21.40 | Dovid | WIMPy: Not really |
| 13:22.04 | WIMPy | You can watch for the hangup event and then request a hangup on the other channel. |
| 13:22.17 | Dovid | WIMPy: I tired. I check to see if the original channel is up. Astertisk is showing that it is even though it hung up |
| 13:22.34 | file | the hangup is deferred |
| 13:22.47 | WIMPy | You don't get a hangup event? |
| 13:22.49 | Dovid | file: but it show up in the AMI right away ? |
| 13:22.54 | file | I doubt it |
| 13:23.14 | Dovid | WIMPy: I wasnt looking for hang up. i was looking to see if the channel was still there |
| 13:23.22 | Dovid | let me see if I see the hang up event |
| 13:24.06 | JunK-Y | Dovid: do you have the same problem using M (macro) ? |
| 13:24.49 | Dovid | WIMPy: i dont get the event till the second leg hangs up. i will only get it if I sniff on port 5060 and see asterisk sending 200 to the BYE |
| 13:25.03 | Dovid | Junk-Y: I am pretty sure |
| 13:25.17 | Dovid | file: in this regard a macro would behave the same way ? |
| 13:25.24 | file | yes |
| 13:25.49 | WIMPy | I guess it might be easier to convinve ppl that not getting the hangup event actually is a bug. |
| 13:26.47 | WIMPy | At least I think it is. But that's just MHO. |
| 13:27.29 | file | it's triggered when the channel within Asterisk is hung up |
| 13:27.34 | file | not when we get notification |
| 13:28.52 | WIMPy | Probably it more fits to the logic of newstate. But that seems to be an important notification to me. |
| 13:29.11 | WIMPy | Just that you usually don't need it as hangup tells the same story. |
| 13:30.10 | Dovid | ima bit lost here. but there seems to be an issue |
| 13:30.56 | JunK-Y | not sure to fully understand why you wanna hangup phone1, since it isnt bridge to phone2 yet? |
| 13:32.22 | Dovid | JunK-Y: very simple. call screening. |
| 13:32.53 | Dovid | if I have call screening on a loop playig a message waiting for the person to press 1 and take the call |
| 13:49.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev razu_ (~razu@razu.data.ee) |
| 13:55.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162) |
| 14:06.05 | Dovid | file: Can I pay you directly to "fix it" or are you strictly Digium ? |
| 14:07.14 | file | I am strictly Digium. |
| 14:07.48 | Dovid | :(:( |
| 14:07.51 | Dovid | soo frustrating |
| 14:08.50 | WIMPy | Not that I have much hope, but have you tried looking if CEL can be made to produce any output? |
| 14:11.14 | Dovid | CEL == ? |
| 14:11.35 | WIMPy | Call Event Logging |
| 14:11.43 | JunK-Y | you probably mean AEL? |
| 14:12.21 | WIMPy | How is that going to help? |
| 14:16.29 | anonymouz666 | where I can see the difference between digium cards generations? |
| 14:23.14 | anonymouz666 | just the generation number then :P |
| 14:34.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dms (~Adium@nat/digium/x-daijrqnmukwprhpb) |
| 14:43.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114) |
| 14:57.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Sipster (~Sipster@modemcable045.5-200-24.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 14:59.03 | leifmadsen | WIMPy: CEL == Channel Event Logging |
| 14:59.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:59.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:00.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:00.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:09.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 15:09.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 15:27.17 | WIMPy | Almost :-) |
| 15:36.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev MuffinMan (~muffinman@asterisk/issue-tracker-bot/muffinman) |
| 15:40.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:57.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-itfysnerwrbcbusm) |
| 15:57.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 15:57.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 16:15.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@173.14.206.193) |
| 16:20.05 | philippel_mac | question before I file a ticket, I have set my parkext to '70' and restarted asterisk, diaplan show parkedcalls shows 70 + the hints, but also '700' so the default does not seem to be changed, just the new exten added |
| 16:20.26 | philippel_mac | is this a bug I should file or is there maybe something dumb I am doing |
| 16:20.30 | philippel_mac | btw on 1.8 |
| 16:22.11 | jsmith | philippel_mac: I'm pretty sure I saw someone else mention it |
| 16:22.29 | jsmith | philippel_mac: So there very well be a bug against it already -- maybe russellb or leifmadsen already know? |
| 16:22.53 | philippel_mac | thx, that's why I posted here before searching the bug system and then filing it. |
| 16:22.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rgagnon (~rgagnon@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 16:23.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev luckman212 (~irc@pool-173-77-253-145.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 16:24.09 | leifmadsen | actually searching first should be the initial step with asking here the penultimate step :) |
| 16:24.22 | kpfleming | you said penultimate |
| 16:24.28 | leifmadsen | I sure did! |
| 16:24.37 | leifmadsen | I spent thousands of dollars at school to use that word |
| 16:25.10 | guax | leifmadsen, any word about 17820? :) |
| 16:25.15 | leifmadsen | M17820 |
| 16:25.17 | MuffinMan | [ready for review] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_agent 0017820: [patch] AGENTBYCALLERID not set for agent logged from AMI reported by guaxinim https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17820 |
| 16:25.25 | leifmadsen | points at Marquis42 |
| 16:25.29 | philippel_mac | leifmadsen: understand, though I'm not expecting anyone to go looking for me, but asking here can result in someone saying 'yup we know' using no brain cycles, vs. spending a lot of time searching just to find it is a known issue |
| 16:25.49 | leifmadsen | philippel_mac: sorry, I don't have 800 issues memorize :D |
| 16:26.09 | philippel_mac | nope - but I get the same thing in my channel |
| 16:26.09 | leifmadsen | I can recall something similar to what you described, but I don't know for sure |
| 16:26.19 | philippel_mac | if someone asks and I happen to know I say 'yup' |
| 16:26.23 | leifmadsen | so you're saying you know better than? :) |
| 16:26.24 | philippel_mac | if not I say go check and file otherwise |
| 16:27.10 | leifmadsen | the easiest thing I find is to just select the Category related to what you're searching for and looking through the list because usually they aren't more than about 10 issues long (except for cases such as chan_sip, or perhaps chan_iax2) |
| 16:27.40 | guax | leifmadsen, talked to him earlier. knows what timezone he is, so i can synchronize the talk? |
| 16:27.56 | philippel_mac | leifmadsen: yum, thanks |
| 16:27.57 | leifmadsen | I'm not sure I understand the question |
| 16:28.04 | leifmadsen | yum install thanks |
| 16:28.07 | leifmadsen | No package found. |
| 16:28.19 | guax | [10:24] <Marquis42> guax: That's a pretty trivial patch. Once the Digiums guys pop into IRC I'll ask if I can just commit (i.e., no review) otherwise I'll put it up for review. |
| 16:28.32 | leifmadsen | guax: right, there you go |
| 16:40.44 | guax | leifmadsen, i just wait then? |
| 16:51.09 | kpfleming | leifmadsen: ping me on jabberz plz |
| 16:55.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 17:04.54 | leifmadsen | guax: sure thing -- Marquis42 was looking into it and I think was just waiting for someone to say, "go ahead!" so hopefully anytime now |
| 17:07.08 | guax | ok, thanks |
| 17:07.41 | leifmadsen | kpfleming: I did |
| 17:08.12 | leifmadsen | did done again! :) |
| 17:09.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev i_heart_asterisk (~chatzilla@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 17:09.28 | *** part/#asterisk-dev i_heart_asterisk (~chatzilla@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 17:10.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev i_heart_asterisk (~chatzilla@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 18:02.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asilva (~andre@2801:88:1000:2:240:a7ff:fe10:28f) |
| 18:48.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~Dovid@213.8.121.90) |
| 19:00.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@192.55.64.189) |
| 19:32.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-wzjhtokzjpnsjghu) |
| 19:33.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-ydmklpduuqozmval) |
| 19:38.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 19:38.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:02.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-ikvwljsfwolitkgs) |
| 20:03.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-jjuybojlbdydkyms) |
| 20:21.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@CPE002719f00364-CM0026f396812d.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 21:47.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@CPE003048b11058-CM0026f396812d.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 22:01.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 22:01.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 22:06.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 22:06.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 22:09.42 | snuff-work | mm.. is it just me or does runtests.py not work with the '-t' flag anymore to test a single module? |
| 22:16.00 | pabelanger | snuff-home: which test? |
| 22:28.59 | snuff-work | try any... so ./runtests.py -t func_srv |
| 22:29.02 | snuff-work | or similar |
| 22:29.21 | snuff-work | u don't see it run anything.. it just spits out in xml.. tests=0 tests-complete=0 |
| 22:29.25 | snuff-work | or similar |
| 22:45.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 22:45.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 23:24.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rgagnon (~rgagnon@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |