| 01:17.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 01:40.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rogersja (~RogersJa@S0106001346faf79f.gv.shawcable.net) |
| 02:18.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 02:48.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev miguel3239 (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 03:44.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 03:45.01 | *** part/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 06:17.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~Julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 06:45.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kwk (~kleine@carbon.gonicus.de) |
| 06:50.47 | *** part/#asterisk-dev jacc0 (~jacco@213.34.68.141) |
| 07:05.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:818b:42da:8ff8:e20c) |
| 07:33.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 07:43.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@mail.redfish-solutions.com) |
| 09:26.33 | jmls | is a mixmonitor file stereo ? inbound channel 0, outbound channel 1? |
| 11:03.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:03.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:31.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:31.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:24.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~cVsup@189.83.144.228) |
| 12:25.28 | snuff-home | mornin kp |
| 12:35.17 | kpfleming | hi |
| 12:35.27 | kpfleming | it's a day of thunderstorms and tornado warnings here |
| 12:37.23 | leifmadsen | good times |
| 12:37.58 | snuff-home | mm.. whole lot of fine weather here.. |
| 12:38.01 | snuff-home | 22c |
| 12:38.35 | snuff-home | is still debating his func_memcache vs one on reviewboard by someone else.. |
| 12:41.43 | snuff-home | all this talk about 1.4/1.6 eol'ing.. reminded of patch for cel for 1.8 an db fields.. |
| 12:49.35 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kwk (~kleine@carbon.gonicus.de) |
| 13:16.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Freeaqingme_ (~dolf@dsl-083-247-011-232.solcon.nl) |
| 13:44.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 13:47.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162) |
| 13:50.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 13:50.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 13:54.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 13:58.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev e_dot_zilla99 (~e_dot_zil@8.224.32.34) |
| 13:59.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 13:59.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:27.02 | Kobaz | aughh |
| 14:27.02 | Kobaz | what does this mean |
| 14:27.38 | Kobaz | [2011-04-27 10:22:42] WARNING[27976]: loader.c:393 load_dynamic_module: Module 'pbx_config.so' did not register itself during load |
| 14:29.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rogersja (~RogersJa@S0106001346faf79f.gv.shawcable.net) |
| 14:30.04 | kpfleming | usually that means it's an old module |
| 14:30.45 | Kobaz | hmm |
| 14:30.51 | Kobaz | if i try to load it again, asterisk crashes |
| 14:31.12 | Kobaz | if i do a core restart now then everything works |
| 14:31.17 | kpfleming | weird |
| 14:31.19 | Kobaz | i can try recopying the modules over |
| 14:31.29 | Kobaz | every day at 10am i have a core restart when convenient |
| 14:31.34 | Kobaz | sometimes it comes back up, sometimes it doesn't |
| 14:32.30 | Kobaz | oh wait, aughh, this is the old old system that i have 1.6.0.19 |
| 14:32.49 | Kobaz | every time i try to upgrade i get crashes, so i got stuck on 1.6.0.19 |
| 14:33.03 | Kobaz | i can try the new 1.8 |
| 14:33.37 | Kobaz | 1.8.3.3 |
| 14:42.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:42.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:47.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asilva (~andre@2801:88:1000:2::18) |
| 14:48.13 | asilva | Just a doubt - The release of asterisk-1.6.2.18 contains the fixes made in 1.6.2.17.3 ? because in changelog there isn't such fixes! |
| 14:49.47 | Kobaz | it wont have the fixes if 1.6.2.18 came out before 1.6.2.17.3 |
| 14:50.09 | Kobaz | oh wait, i might be remembering the release cycle wrong |
| 14:50.14 | Kobaz | 1.6.2.x is one branch |
| 14:50.44 | Kobaz | so actually 1.6.2.18 would have everything from 1.6.2.17.3 unless something was taken back out due to a problem |
| 14:51.14 | Kobaz | unless there was an exception and 1.6.2.17.x was only for 1.6.2.17 |
| 14:52.57 | asilva | its kinda confusing heeeh |
| 14:52.57 | leifmadsen | Kobaz: 1.6.2.18 would contain everything after 1.6.2.17-rc1 up to the point 1.6.2.18-rc1 was created |
| 14:53.10 | leifmadsen | in the changelog you will see some additional changes were merged due to security releases |
| 14:53.29 | leifmadsen | Kobaz: 1.6.2.17.{1,2,3} would be always based on 1.6.2.17 |
| 14:53.34 | leifmadsen | with specific revisions merged in |
| 14:53.41 | leifmadsen | (for security and whatnot) |
| 14:54.09 | leifmadsen | after an rc1 is created, the tags are never based on the branches -- always based on the previous tag with 1.6.2.X-rc1 being the root |
| 14:54.42 | Kobaz | so if there is a .1 off of a point release |
| 14:54.50 | Kobaz | then that's a new branch? |
| 14:54.54 | leifmadsen | no |
| 14:55.00 | leifmadsen | it's a copy of the previous tag + changes |
| 14:55.05 | Kobaz | ah okay |
| 14:55.12 | leifmadsen | svn cp $AST/1.6.2.17 $AST/1.6.2.17.1 |
| 14:55.16 | Kobaz | k |
| 14:55.22 | Kobaz | and then 1.6.2.17.1 -> forward? |
| 14:55.23 | leifmadsen | svn merge -c 123456 $AST/1.6.2 . |
| 14:55.35 | Kobaz | okay so that goes back to the branch |
| 14:55.40 | leifmadsen | 1.6.2.17.1 is then the root for 1.6.2.17.X+n |
| 14:55.56 | leifmadsen | changes are committed to the branch, then merged from the branch to the tag |
| 14:55.59 | leifmadsen | specific revisions |
| 14:56.06 | Kobaz | yeah, k |
| 14:56.14 | leifmadsen | so 1.6.2.17.1 is exactly what was contained in 1.6.2.17 + specific change merged from the branch |
| 14:56.21 | Kobaz | yeah |
| 14:56.48 | leifmadsen | 1.6.2.17.2 is exactly what was contained in 1.6.2.17.1 + specific revisions merged from the branch |
| 14:56.52 | Kobaz | what happens with timing for say 1.6.2.18... you might tag an rc, and then find a security problem in .17 |
| 14:57.36 | leifmadsen | then 1.6.2.17.1 is created, those changes are merged to that tag and released. Then prior to 1.6.2.18 being released, those same changes are merged prior to release |
| 14:57.50 | Kobaz | okay so you would do another rc |
| 14:57.56 | leifmadsen | not necessarily |
| 14:58.01 | Kobaz | to make sure 1.6.2.17.x changes made it into .18? |
| 14:58.08 | leifmadsen | only if changes other than security related were done |
| 14:58.11 | Kobaz | ah |
| 14:58.15 | Kobaz | okay makes sense |
| 14:58.25 | leifmadsen | svn cp $AST/1.6.2.18-rc $AST/1.6.2.18 |
| 14:58.30 | Kobaz | yeah |
| 14:58.32 | leifmadsen | svn merge -c 123456 $AST/1.6.2 . |
| 14:58.37 | leifmadsen | where . is 1.6.2.18 tag |
| 14:58.53 | leifmadsen | which is why you'll see in the changelog something like: |
| 14:58.58 | leifmadsen | * Asterisk 1.6.2.18 released |
| 14:59.01 | Kobaz | yeah |
| 14:59.06 | leifmadsen | * Changes related to AST-2011-005 and AST-2011-006 |
| 15:02.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-dwbgrpndlehfmgwz) |
| 15:02.57 | Kobaz | i have a bunch of logging improvements in app_dial |
| 15:03.07 | Kobaz | is there any convention that should be followed? |
| 15:04.04 | Kobaz | like, almost every single message in wait_for_answer() is without any kind of context |
| 15:04.09 | Kobaz | %s is ringing |
| 15:04.17 | Kobaz | totally meaningless in a busy system |
| 15:04.39 | asilva | So to clear it up 1.6.2.18 ist branch with merges from 1.6. <18 right? |
| 15:04.42 | Kobaz | so instead i have: ast_verb(3, "%s calling %s (callee is ringing)\n", in->name, c->name); |
| 15:05.06 | Kobaz | asilva: yes |
| 15:06.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 15:06.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 15:06.02 | asilva | ok. i got confused because i couldn't see the fixes from 1.6.2.17.3 changelog in 1.6.2.18 changelog.. but now you confirmed its the newest i'm ok with that! |
| 15:21.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162) |
| 15:49.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JonathanRose (~jonathan@nat/digium/x-fwkodizszpvtlhbo) |
| 15:51.32 | russellb | JonathanRose: pabelanger: http://bamboo.asterisk.org/build/viewBuildResultsSuccessfulTests.action?buildKey=ASTTRUNK-LUCID-AMD64&buildNumber=513&pageSize=50&pageIndex=1 |
| 15:51.44 | russellb | <PROTECTED> |
| 15:51.54 | russellb | <PROTECTED> |
| 15:51.59 | pabelanger | russellb: ya, just found it. I was looking in chan_sip.c |
| 15:53.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:54.05 | JonathanRose | "This test case has never failed." |
| 15:54.15 | russellb | \o/ |
| 15:54.21 | JonathanRose | no pressure. |
| 15:54.30 | Freeaqingme_ | whoever cares: the copyright notice that's displayed when starting the asterisk binary with 1.8.4-rc2 still uses the year 2010 instead of 20111 |
| 15:54.43 | russellb | ooh, thanks |
| 15:54.47 | russellb | I guess I'll change it |
| 15:55.04 | pabelanger | JonathanRose: Nice, add your test and see what happens :) |
| 15:56.34 | russellb | commit asterisk 315810 |
| 15:56.35 | MuffinMan | [315810] Committed by russell on 2011-04-27T15:55:48.028988Z: Set the copyright year to 2011 in the startup message. |
| 15:56.36 | MuffinMan | .. |
| 15:56.36 | MuffinMan | .. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=315810 |
| 15:57.16 | Freeaqingme_ | speaking of quick responses ;) |
| 15:57.21 | kpfleming | russellb: too bad you can't just put 'insert current year here' |
| 15:57.52 | Freeaqingme_ | the webinterface is slower with indexing than the bot? |
| 15:58.07 | russellb | kpfleming: i'm sure it could be done ... but is it worth the 30 minutes to dev and test it? meh |
| 15:58.37 | kpfleming | well, and you'd have to make it a static year when you made a tag |
| 15:59.11 | russellb | yeah ... a .year file that is used to define a constant in a header at build time ... |
| 15:59.14 | russellb | sillyness |
| 15:59.36 | Freeaqingme_ | you could just put it in your calendar. Every first monday of the year: change date |
| 15:59.50 | russellb | it's more fun to just let someone notice and remind |
| 16:00.15 | Freeaqingme_ | heh |
| 16:00.25 | Freeaqingme_ | well, it's a way of increasing community involvement I suppose :P |
| 16:01.22 | Freeaqingme_ | russellb, either the svn webview is slow, or you should also still merge it with the 1.8 branch? |
| 16:02.14 | russellb | that commit was for the 1.8 branch |
| 16:02.25 | russellb | i think the mirror might be be broken, will check on it now |
| 16:03.41 | russellb | yep, broke |
| 16:03.42 | Freeaqingme_ | no worries. I can also just check the svn repo itself. It's just that this link was provided |
| 16:06.12 | russellb | it's syncing up now |
| 16:06.35 | russellb | should be good now |
| 16:10.19 | Freeaqingme_ | cool |
| 16:10.37 | Freeaqingme_ | just noticing, the years in the copyright notices in the source code are also outdated |
| 16:11.44 | russellb | yeah, those are fine, should only change them when we're actually making substantial changes to the file |
| 16:11.50 | russellb | ... but we usually forget |
| 16:12.28 | Freeaqingme_ | russellb, heh. I'm a ZendFramework contributor, and with ZF we just run some grep and sed foobar each year to update them all at once |
| 16:12.56 | Freeaqingme_ | may be an idea. Not that anybody really cares |
| 16:14.37 | Qwell | Freeaqingme: that isn't accurate though |
| 16:14.49 | Qwell | Since the copyright doesn't change unless you actually make significant changes. |
| 16:16.40 | Freeaqingme_ | dunno about that. We regard the framework as a whole I think, so as long as it is worked on each year an update is appropriate |
| 16:16.53 | Freeaqingme_ | I think, though IANAL |
| 16:30.55 | leifmadsen | So when that Snom joins we get this: |
| 16:30.56 | leifmadsen | 2011-04-27 12:29:08] ERROR[23074]: chan_sip.c:28592 setup_srtp: No SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session. |
| 16:31.03 | leifmadsen | [2011-04-27 12:29:23] ERROR[24389]: res_rtp_asterisk.c:2053 ast_rtp_read: Bad address cast to IPv4 |
| 16:33.21 | russellb | leifmadsen: the polycom song would be very appropriate right now |
| 16:33.52 | russellb | leifmadsen: you'll need to leave time for the count of callers to play before it starts |
| 16:34.18 | russellb | xlnt. |
| 16:35.16 | russellb | leifmadsen: nobody thought it was funny :-( |
| 16:35.22 | leifmadsen | fail |
| 16:44.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 16:44.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 16:49.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-skmednpjuzsjtvsl) |
| 16:51.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-rspuhxikawzrzhbs) |
| 16:53.47 | e_dot_zilla99 | fail whale |
| 16:54.11 | mnicholson | maybe the packet that is causing that RTP error message isn't an rtp packet or something |
| 17:04.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rogersja (~RogersJa@S0106000f6695039f.gv.shawcable.net) |
| 17:07.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sakajawebe (~chazz@nat/digium/x-cbbienjewtxiiyxt) |
| 17:16.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 17:16.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 17:24.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-hmalkqagnjeqehjb) |
| 17:28.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 17:28.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 17:36.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev not_schmaltz (~Athens@74-92-102-230-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 18:01.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 18:01.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 18:02.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-tzpzxznppgotbngv) |
| 18:10.48 | Kobaz | perhaps |
| 18:10.50 | Kobaz | er |
| 19:37.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 19:39.06 | seanbright | nothing worse than getting heckled by your own teammates |
| 19:39.28 | seanbright | any bugs i can work on? |
| 19:39.49 | seanbright | looks at mantis |
| 19:46.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wedhorn (~wedhorn@123-243-209-34.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 19:47.51 | leifmadsen | seanbright: there are at least 3 bugs :) |
| 19:48.10 | leifmadsen | seanbright: I recommend looking at the roadmap and seeing if you can bang out anything in the 1.4/1.6.2 Final Release roadmap |
| 19:48.17 | leifmadsen | that would be extremely useful |
| 19:48.21 | seanbright | will do |
| 19:50.20 | seanbright | so i haven't followed the thread on -dev as closely as i should |
| 19:50.30 | seanbright | but has oej pointed out actual problems in 1.8? |
| 19:50.39 | seanbright | or just FUD? |
| 19:50.49 | Qwell | I do not believe so. |
| 19:51.29 | seanbright | that reduces the chances of his concerns being alleviated |
| 19:52.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br) |
| 19:53.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 19:53.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:07.01 | leifmadsen | seanbright: ya, I think a couple of people were asking for specific issues that has stopped him (and others) from migrating to 1.8, but the only response I saw was, "I don't have time to file issues" |
| 20:07.25 | leifmadsen | some other people have provided issue numbers which was useful, and I've been assigning them to the roadmap that I pointed you to |
| 20:07.30 | leifmadsen | seems like they are getting closed out pretty quickly |
| 20:09.42 | seanbright | ok, awesome |
| 20:09.52 | seanbright | looking now |
| 20:10.06 | leifmadsen | excellent thanks! |
| 20:10.23 | leifmadsen | of course there are Ready For Review and Ready For Testing issues which may contain some low hanging fruit |
| 20:40.35 | seanbright | s/AstriCon 2001/AstriCon 2011/ |
| 20:46.27 | Qwell | seanbright: Does it actually say 2001 somewhere? I was totally trolling on David, thinking it was his typo. |
| 20:46.35 | file | yes. |
| 20:46.42 | Qwell | Where? |
| 20:46.47 | seanbright | subject line |
| 20:47.01 | seanbright | -dev mailing list |
| 20:47.03 | Qwell | oh, it changed for -dev |
| 20:47.06 | Qwell | I was looking at -biz |
| 20:47.08 | seanbright | Bryan M. Johns |
| 20:57.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~terry@69.76.221.65) |
| 21:29.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 21:29.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 21:31.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 21:34.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 21:35.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 21:35.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 21:40.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cyphorious (~cyphoriou@chello062178189196.2.15.tuwien.teleweb.at) |
| 21:40.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 21:40.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 21:42.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev seraphie (~erin@207.98.195.107) |
| 22:14.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 22:20.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~cVsup@189.83.144.228) |
| 22:23.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asilva (~andre@2801:88:1000:2::18) |