| 00:39.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net) |
| 00:39.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 01:13.54 | WIMPy | Has anything happened to IAX? All calls go to the h extension for me. |
| 01:14.18 | WIMPy | Well, only those that would match an extension. Those that wouldn't match are rejected. |
| 01:16.34 | WIMPy | [2012-03-08 02:15:03] == Spawn extension (dial-user, 23240, -1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/yeti-lmaa-189' |
| 01:16.47 | WIMPy | I wonder if the -1 is a hint? |
| 01:19.13 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net) |
| 01:32.35 | WIMPy | Downgraded to 10.2.0 and it works again. |
| 01:43.31 | jsmith | WIMPy: Yes, priority -1 is the same as "hint" |
| 01:44.34 | WIMPy | So that is obviousely bad. |
| 01:51.52 | WIMPy | I can't find anything in svn log I'd realte with that. Maybe it's not inside chan_iax2? |
| 01:52.13 | WIMPy | But the same context is workig with chan_sip and chan_lcr. |
| 01:56.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net) |
| 01:56.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 03:16.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 04:04.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 05:13.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 05:13.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 05:31.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@50-76-98-170-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 07:23.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at) |
| 07:23.52 | schmidts | good morning |
| 08:18.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev WIMPy (~wimpy@e183095026.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 09:34.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 09:34.48 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 09:40.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@static-213-115-251-100.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 09:40.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 09:40.44 | oej | Morning folks |
| 09:41.28 | wdoekes2 | morn olle |
| 10:10.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oron_laptop (~oron_lapt@local.xorcom.com) |
| 10:23.26 | schmidts | morning olle |
| 10:24.23 | oej | hello stefan |
| 10:27.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 10:27.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 16:02.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (~infobot@rikers.org) |
| 16:02.59 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Tier 4 support is in #2,000 |
| 16:22.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@38.100.211.103) |
| 16:50.28 | Corydon76-work | kpfleming: ping |
| 16:50.48 | kpfleming | Corydon76-work: pong |
| 16:51.19 | Corydon76-work | https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1592/ Would you agree that this is a realtime bugfix? |
| 16:51.54 | Corydon76-work | Someone asked, and it's plausible, so I wanted agreement |
| 16:52.06 | kpfleming | well, i wouldn't say that it's a bug fix, but i'd agree that without it a documented feature is unnecessarily hard to use |
| 16:52.12 | kpfleming | so i'd not object to that going in |
| 16:52.19 | kpfleming | we should get an opinion from putnopvut too though |
| 16:52.49 | putnopvut | looks |
| 16:54.36 | putnopvut | I would also disagree that it is a bug fix. It is a nice feature to have though. |
| 16:55.32 | leifmadsen | at least things would be consistent in how they work, which could be a good thing |
| 16:56.03 | kpfleming | well, as it stands today, if your database decides to change the order of the columns returned in a query (which it can do if it wants), then your system falls apart |
| 16:56.14 | putnopvut | Yeah, and now that I think about how realtime works, it's bloody difficult to get it to accurately return columns in an order like people might desire for permit/deny. |
| 16:56.20 | kpfleming | right |
| 16:56.47 | Corydon76-work | There was a similar fix for allow/disallow that only went into trunk, because I didn't consider it a bugfix. |
| 16:56.58 | putnopvut | The only thing stopping me from saying "commit it, you studly man!" is the that the only testing done is "it compiles" |
| 16:56.58 | kpfleming | since it is permit/deny, this could *almost* be considered a security issue, since if the columns are returned in the wrong order, your system will be open to people that you tried to block |
| 16:57.28 | Corydon76-work | Ooo, yeah, that's true |
| 16:58.03 | kpfleming | i'm not sure it's worth an advisory, but it adds to the justification for getting it put into the release branches |
| 16:58.12 | kpfleming | but i agree with putnopvut, we should have some actual testing done first |
| 16:58.26 | Qwell | kpfleming: would that suggest that it would go into 1.4/1.6.2 then as well? |
| 16:58.59 | kpfleming | i would not issue a directive for that, but if the consensus was that it should, i would not object to that either |
| 16:59.46 | Qwell | it would potentially put it in a weird state if we did, and didn't make releases |
| 17:00.28 | Corydon76-work | If it went into 1.4/1.6.2 and we made releases, it would look weird if we also didn't write a security document for it |
| 17:00.36 | kpfleming | agred |
| 17:00.42 | kpfleming | s/e/ee/ |
| 17:01.05 | kpfleming | so we should probably move this to the mailing list to get some more opinions |
| 17:01.08 | Corydon76-work | So we need to test, and if I want it to go into 1.4/1.6.2, I need to write a security advisory for it |
| 17:01.18 | Corydon76-work | Okay |
| 17:19.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 17:19.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 18:01.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 18:01.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 18:46.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oron_laptop (~oron_lapt@line25-214.adsl.actcom.co.il) |
| 19:41.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@rrcs-173-197-0-67.west.biz.rr.com) |
| 20:22.54 | tzafrir_laptop | sruffell, are there any plans for a 2.5 / 2.6 release any time soon? |
| 20:23.05 | sruffell | yes…..definitely next week. |
| 20:23.08 | sruffell | 100% |
| 20:23.20 | sruffell | (and another 2.4…just for good measure) |
| 20:23.21 | tzafrir_laptop | Thanks |
| 22:50.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@221.red-80-28-139.adsl.static.ccgg.telefonica.net) |
| 23:30.19 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-dlbchxqurcvuyozf) |