| 02:57.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev TazzNZ (~TazzNZ@office-nat1.ytechops.co.nz) |
| 03:03.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 03:56.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jagruti_ (~root@182.70.116.47) |
| 03:56.46 | *** part/#asterisk-dev jagruti_ (~root@182.70.116.47) |
| 04:15.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~leedm777@50-81-28-152.client.mchsi.com) |
| 05:13.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 06:34.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 06:34.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 07:47.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 08:19.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:19.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 08:22.07 | wdoekes | tzafrir: does gitorious asterisk update the tags automatically? |
| 08:24.16 | wdoekes | I'm asking, because this: |
| 08:24.16 | wdoekes | asterisk-gitorious$ git pull --rebase; git tag | grep ^v11 | sort -V | tail -n1 |
| 08:24.20 | wdoekes | Current branch svn_11 is up to date. |
| 08:24.22 | wdoekes | v11.12.0-rc1 |
| 08:25.05 | wdoekes | while the commits in svn_11 are up to date |
| 08:26.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev iceslice (~Rashed@unaffiliated/iceslice) |
| 08:32.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@static-213-115-251-100.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 08:32.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:39.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@static-213-115-251-100.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 08:39.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 09:16.26 | tzafrir | hmmm, it should |
| 09:21.39 | tzafrir | wdoekes, v11.6.0 is there |
| 09:21.52 | wdoekes | 6 is not 16 |
| 09:22.17 | tzafrir | sorry, v11.16.0 as well |
| 09:22.26 | wdoekes | it is? |
| 09:22.37 | wdoekes | in that case my pull isn't pulling in any tags |
| 09:22.47 | wdoekes | (I don't work much with tags) |
| 09:25.58 | wdoekes | asterisk-gitorious$ git pull --tags; git tag | grep ^v11 | sort -V | tail -n1 |
| 09:26.04 | wdoekes | Fetching tags only, you probably meant: git fetch --tags |
| 09:26.04 | wdoekes | v11.16.0-rc1 |
| 09:26.07 | wdoekes | so.. it works |
| 09:26.11 | wdoekes | sorry for the noise :) |
| 09:28.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev iceslice (~Rashed@unaffiliated/iceslice) |
| 11:07.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev iceslice (~Rashed@unaffiliated/iceslice) |
| 11:12.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~brad@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 11:12.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 11:34.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dustinm (~dustinm@105.ip-167-114-152.net) |
| 11:46.44 | tzafrir | Asterisk fails building with gcc 5: http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150205/asterisk_13.1.0~dfsg-1_unstable_gcc5.log |
| 13:08.46 | tzafrir | https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24783 |
| 13:45.54 | seanbright | ruh roh... AEL |
| 13:46.02 | seanbright | that's a clean piece of the codebase |
| 13:46.02 | seanbright | heh |
| 13:46.42 | Marquis42 | I'm pretty sure there's a little bit of my code in there, which means you can rest assured that it's anything but clean. ;) :D |
| 13:52.39 | blitzrage | true story, I've seen Marquis42's coding |
| 13:52.40 | blitzrage | ducks |
| 13:53.09 | Marquis42 | fucker :P |
| 13:53.11 | Marquis42 | <3 |
| 13:53.19 | blitzrage | yes yes, much love |
| 13:53.21 | blitzrage | lol |
| 13:54.23 | file | language :P |
| 13:56.08 | Marquis42 | I like your style, dude, but do you have to use so many cuss words? |
| 13:58.50 | skrusty | afternoon |
| 13:59.35 | file | g'day |
| 14:05.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 14:13.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (leedm777@nat/digium/x-aybwzprziyelngkt) |
| 14:23.16 | Kobaz | hey sooo |
| 14:23.44 | Kobaz | would chan_sip want to hang up if the far end keeps asking for a reinvite on a different codec that the sip peer is not configured for? |
| 14:24.15 | Kobaz | I'm seeing this: |
| 14:25.04 | Kobaz | http://pastebin.com/HV3GqQTX |
| 14:25.12 | Kobaz | why would asterisk hang up? |
| 14:32.48 | file | no clue |
| 14:35.15 | Kobaz | [2015-02-09 10:01:45.027] NOTICE[25344] chan_sip.c: Disconnecting call 'SIP/Seaport-CM-1-00000a05' for lack of RTP activity in 61 seconds |
| 14:35.18 | Kobaz | that'll do it |
| 14:35.26 | Kobaz | ugh |
| 14:36.58 | Kobaz | what's weird, is there *is* rtp on that ladder |
| 14:39.17 | pabelanger | file, I cannot remember, who is running point of the testsuite gitification? |
| 14:39.24 | pabelanger | . |
| 14:39.34 | file | ummmm I don't know if there's anyone running point currently |
| 14:39.43 | pabelanger | okay |
| 14:40.15 | pabelanger | maybe I should put my name in the hat |
| 14:40.16 | pabelanger | :) |
| 14:52.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-ejcicniwisvenbcv) |
| 14:52.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 15:11.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-fxrefuxlatfgdkdp) |
| 15:18.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 15:18.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 15:31.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 15:31.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:39.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgriepentrog (sgriepentr@nat/digium/x-beysquzysxymwgdf) |
| 15:44.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-nbhvqnarkqoimpyl) |
| 16:00.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 16:13.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 16:45.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (mjordan@nat/digium/x-txxsuxepchbeuxpb) |
| 16:45.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 17:17.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 17:17.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 17:53.13 | pabelanger | So, I want to create a python app to check dialplan syntax..... am I crazy? |
| 17:54.46 | mjordan | yes |
| 17:55.10 | pabelanger | sounds about right |
| 17:55.16 | pabelanger | I know check_expr in utils does something |
| 17:55.26 | pabelanger | but don't think anybody has used that in like 10 year |
| 17:55.28 | pabelanger | years* |
| 17:56.26 | mjordan | I wouldn't trust anything in utils |
| 17:56.39 | mjordan | honestly, if you were to write an interpreter, Python would be a good approach |
| 17:56.56 | mjordan | interpreter/linter |
| 17:56.58 | pabelanger | indeed |
| 17:57.20 | pabelanger | I'm trying to think of a way to get dialplan 'code coverage' |
| 17:57.21 | mjordan | the real trick is going to be the syntax of the apps |
| 17:57.22 | pabelanger | outside asterisk |
| 17:57.22 | file | I suppose it also depends on what you mean by "check dialplan syntax" |
| 17:57.26 | file | yeah |
| 17:57.27 | mjordan | but I think you could punt on that part |
| 17:57.48 | gtjoseph | just run asterisk with a skeleton config and no channel drivers |
| 17:58.08 | pabelanger | I'm thinking more from an automated test POV |
| 17:58.14 | pabelanger | sure, you can originate channels and stuff |
| 17:58.27 | pabelanger | but, it would be so much easier if you could lint some dialplan first |
| 17:58.45 | pabelanger | even, assertDial() |
| 17:58.49 | pabelanger | assertQueue() |
| 17:58.51 | pabelanger | etc |
| 17:59.32 | blitzrage | I'd primarily be checking for basic things to start like that extensions start with priority one, that same follows, that things are within a context, etc |
| 17:59.48 | blitzrage | maybe ignore the arguments to an app, but validate that the app/function name being used is valid |
| 17:59.51 | blitzrage | (e.g. no typo) |
| 17:59.59 | blitzrage | that would get you a lot of coverage already |
| 18:00.23 | gtjoseph | You could write a wrapper just like the testsuite does that starts, checks for errors, then kills. |
| 18:00.34 | coreyfarrell | pabelanger: I've tried thinking of ways to get dialplan test coverage as well.. how do you plan to collect run-time hits? Watch AMI Newexten or something? |
| 18:02.03 | pabelanger | coreyfarrell, so, I was thinking of using CEL for some |
| 18:02.18 | pabelanger | but, ya some sort of event to collect and match on |
| 18:02.57 | mjordan | http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/testsuite/asterisk/trunk/tests/pbx/dialplan/configs/ast1/extensions.conf |
| 18:03.05 | pabelanger | right |
| 18:03.07 | mjordan | the existing dialplan test in the test suite. |
| 18:03.16 | pabelanger | Ya, I remember writing some of that code |
| 18:03.24 | mjordan | there's been some additions |
| 18:03.29 | pabelanger | indeed |
| 18:03.44 | pabelanger | thats more to test functions in asterisk, which is good and cool |
| 18:03.47 | mjordan | I wouldn't say this approach is perfect - a lint/analysis tool would be great |
| 18:03.56 | pabelanger | I was thinking more about testing a GoSub, or something along that lines |
| 18:04.02 | mjordan | but things like dialplan pattern match testing are hard to do without just hitting a lot of different cases |
| 18:04.07 | mjordan | pabelanger: that's in there |
| 18:04.14 | mjordan | ; GoSub, Return, LOCAL, LOCAL_PEEK |
| 18:04.17 | coreyfarrell | mjordan: I may be thinking of something different from pabelanger, but I'm interested in being able to run a dialplan coverage report after manual testing of customer dialplan |
| 18:04.38 | pabelanger | mjordan, yup, see that now |
| 18:04.42 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: that would be cool |
| 18:04.49 | pabelanger | coreyfarrell, yes, I would like that too |
| 18:04.57 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: you could pretty easily write that by adding a trace counter to the exten structure in the pbx core |
| 18:05.20 | pabelanger | that would be nice |
| 18:05.20 | mjordan | and then have it dump out the dialplan with a 'was executed/was not executed' marker |
| 18:05.27 | mjordan | hell, you could even track how many times it was executed |
| 18:05.32 | pabelanger | right |
| 18:05.40 | mjordan | I would make it conditionally compiled in |
| 18:05.59 | mjordan | since that could add some overhead in what is already a slightly strained part of the code |
| 18:06.02 | pabelanger | right |
| 18:06.09 | pabelanger | dialplan show coverage |
| 18:06.12 | pabelanger | hotness |
| 18:06.25 | pabelanger | dialplan reset coverage |
| 18:06.38 | coreyfarrell | mjordan: that makes sense, it would get around issues of having external code understand includes and extension patterns |
| 18:10.33 | pabelanger | mjordan, ast_exten, right? |
| 18:11.48 | coreyfarrell | that would make sense to me |
| 18:12.48 | mjordan | pabelanger: believe so, yes, but I usually purge my memory after looking at pbx.c |
| 18:23.27 | pabelanger | mjordan, I see that |
| 18:24.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jacoby6000 (~jbarber@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 18:27.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 18:27.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 19:02.41 | tzafrir | mjordan, regarding gcc-5: what system do you have? |
| 19:03.12 | tzafrir | I installed it in a Debian Unstable + Experimental chroot |
| 19:03.59 | tzafrir | Should be simple to install on Debian / Ubuntu |
| 19:05.09 | mjordan | tzafrir: I'm running an ancient version of Fedora on one box and Linux Mint on the other |
| 19:05.37 | mjordan | I could spin up a VM, but I suspect that this is going to be one of those deep dives to try and figure out what the compiler is angry about. I'm a bit concerned that the semantics of extern inline changed suddenly |
| 19:05.43 | tzafrir | Should be doable on Mint |
| 19:05.50 | mjordan | granted, clang hates AST_INLINE_API as well |
| 19:05.51 | tzafrir | With schroot |
| 19:06.05 | mjordan | it's doable, the time to do it right now isn't :-) |
| 19:06.58 | tzafrir | OK. Let me know if you need help with it. It should take ~30 minutes to cnfigure schroot. Most of it is the chroot download |
| 19:22.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev linetrace (~linetrace@65.19.88.200) |
| 19:34.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zerohalo (~zerohalo@2601:6:f80:224:b066:cf0b:6b27:3658) |
| 19:44.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 19:44.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 20:58.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@213.133.141.248) |
| 21:04.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@213.133.141.248) |
| 21:18.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@213.133.141.248) |
| 22:07.24 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (mjordan@nat/digium/x-txxsuxepchbeuxpb) |
| 22:14.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (mjordan@nat/digium/x-oxjrxalcmynnmixx) |
| 22:14.12 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 22:14.17 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (mjordan@nat/digium/x-oxjrxalcmynnmixx) |
| 22:17.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-218-28-58.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 22:17.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 22:19.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@213.133.141.248) |
| 22:22.18 | jsmith | pabelanger: So, how good is this restaurant *really*? |
| 22:37.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~anonymous@213.133.141.248) |
| 22:57.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 23:32.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (~blatus@203.87.61.22) |
| 23:32.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 23:37.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jamuel (~Adium@50-78-107-201-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |