| 01:16.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev acidfoo_ (~acidfoo@157-52-14-38.cpe.teksavvy.com) |
| 02:11.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev opticron (~opticron@75.76.51.46) |
| 02:11.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o opticron] by ChanServ |
| 02:26.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 04:49.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fqzfabwxdqnzjsnc) |
| 04:59.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bof22 (~Thunderbi@185.13.183.107) |
| 06:53.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 07:21.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 07:38.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-35-201.wall.uls.co.za) |
| 07:48.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:48.51 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 07:59.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 09:33.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 09:59.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 11:40.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev acidfoo_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 12:18.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~Joe@216-191-106-165.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 13:30.05 | gtjoseph | getting delays and timeouts on 'git review' ops this morning. |
| 13:30.27 | gtjoseph | wonder if gerrit needs a nudge |
| 13:32.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@ip72-201-239-241.ph.ph.cox.net) |
| 13:40.00 | file | gtjoseph, hrm |
| 13:41.11 | file | indeed indeed |
| 13:41.18 | file | about 6 days is the magic number |
| 13:41.27 | file | memory usage is fine too |
| 13:41.49 | gtjoseph | netstat -antp ? |
| 13:42.36 | file | ha, nah, java heap space |
| 13:42.42 | file | restarting |
| 13:44.10 | gtjoseph | hmmm. wonder if the ssh package is the cause or just the canary? |
| 13:50.01 | file | I think it's a combo of that plus the repo size... |
| 13:55.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 13:55.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 13:57.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-bjduiehulcampeeu) |
| 13:57.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 14:11.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-csxqmqhsbpkswzss) |
| 14:11.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Qwell (~north@asterisk/developer/Qwell) |
| 14:11.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Qwell] by ChanServ |
| 14:17.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JunK-Y (~junky@pdpc/supporter/active/junk-y) |
| 14:19.29 | JunK-Y | good morning. |
| 14:20.36 | file | hello |
| 14:21.06 | acidfoo_ | JunK-Y yo buddy ! |
| 14:21.12 | JunK-Y | whats up file? |
| 14:21.15 | JunK-Y | hey acidfoo_ ! |
| 14:21.22 | cresl1n | Hate is waiting on a git clone of the asterisk repo to complete |
| 14:21.26 | file | workin' away, holdin' out for frozen yogurt |
| 14:21.29 | cresl1n | JunK-Y: !!!!! |
| 14:21.47 | file | cresl1n, git.asterisk.org is faster, github is even faster |
| 14:22.12 | cresl1n | faster than what? |
| 14:22.15 | file | gerrit |
| 14:22.44 | cresl1n | Nice - will have to try that. |
| 14:23.11 | file | and because the review sets up a different remote, you can clone from there and still submit reviews or pull down reviews |
| 14:23.17 | file | and the mirroring is almost realtime |
| 14:23.29 | cresl1n | I'll have to do it next time. |
| 14:23.50 | file | cresl1n, The More You Know(tm) |
| 14:24.24 | cresl1n | The more trouble you get into? |
| 14:24.26 | cresl1n | :-) |
| 14:24.34 | file | cresl1n, WRONG! |
| 14:24.38 | file | cresl1n, the more meetings and responsibility you get |
| 14:26.42 | cresl1n | Any reason why https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/2572/1/main/format_cap.c is not a no-brainer? |
| 14:27.15 | file | nope, but it needs to be cherry picked into the appropriate branches |
| 14:27.29 | file | and we should urge Alexei to start doing that |
| 14:30.16 | JunK-Y | cresl1n: !!!! |
| 14:30.26 | cresl1n | Hey JunK-Y!!! |
| 14:42.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-ikhdojofomdyydiq) |
| 14:49.12 | file | I think today is Tuesday. |
| 14:49.40 | gtjoseph | i think your right |
| 14:50.12 | gtjoseph | but it still kinda feels like a monday |
| 15:00.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev acidfoo_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 15:18.41 | cresl1n | +1 gtjoseph |
| 15:19.32 | gtjoseph | at least spring is here... the landscapers showed up to mow for the first time this year. |
| 15:19.54 | file | gtjoseph, mine showed up yesterday to move the gravel that got relocated to my lawn due to snow removal back to my driveway |
| 15:19.59 | file | spring is surely on its way here |
| 15:20.16 | gtjoseph | :) |
| 16:41.30 | gtjoseph | can someone give a re-review to 2367? I redid the locking to reduce the number of write locks but i've been staring at that code for a month now and my eyes cross when i look at it now |
| 17:21.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 17:21.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 17:57.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-179-40-172.cust.bezeqint.net) |
| 17:57.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 18:06.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net) |
| 18:06.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 18:12.25 | acidfoo_ | is there a place in chan_sip where the cached peer is updated ? I'm trying to find an example of that in the code, or does the peer is just linked, destroyed, recreated and then cached again ? |
| 18:20.09 | file | it's completely recreated if I remember right |
| 18:31.52 | acidfoo_ | ok |
| 18:32.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@ip72-201-239-241.ph.ph.cox.net) |
| 18:32.16 | acidfoo_ | I don't understand how the devicestate is preserved tho |
| 18:32.25 | acidfoo_ | if it's completely recreated :| |
| 18:55.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lnxslck (~lnxslck@av3-84-90-162-98.netvisao.pt) |
| 19:03.58 | gtjoseph | anyone got a reference for the Contact (uri)alias parameter? Kamailio uses it but I can't find any RFC or draft that specifies it. Google is no help. |
| 19:04.23 | file | gtjoseph, parameters in a Contact are opaque so it can be what it wants it to be |
| 19:04.42 | gtjoseph | uri parameters or Contact parameters?? |
| 19:05.13 | file | both |
| 19:05.30 | gtjoseph | hmmm |
| 19:06.41 | gtjoseph | pjproject barfs on Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1;alias=[1:2:3]abc> |
| 19:07.06 | gtjoseph | because it strips out the [] and leaves the scanner in an inconsistent state. |
| 21:34.13 | gtjoseph | Is there a hook that notifies issue watchers when a review is posted against the issue? |
| 21:34.50 | file | no, unless JIRA automagically does it |
| 21:35.12 | gtjoseph | i'm thinking not. |
| 21:35.45 | file | it's JIRA, so that's a safe bet |
| 23:17.18 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-csxqmqhsbpkswzss) |