| 00:21.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 00:21.54 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 04:35.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Kobaz (~kobaz@its.kobaz.net) |
| 05:09.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bof22 (~Thunderbi@185.13.183.107) |
| 06:00.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@LStLambert-657-1-90-73.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 07:04.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tsearle (~tsearle@37.19.10.33) |
| 07:11.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tsearle (~tsearle@37.19.10.33) |
| 07:29.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 08:47.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@LStLambert-657-1-90-73.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 12:47.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 12:47.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 13:15.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev scgm11_ (~scgm11@r186-52-82-219.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) |
| 13:46.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev scgm11_ (~scgm11@r186-50-33-140.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) |
| 14:15.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-lyixuovekpvaxjue) |
| 14:15.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ |
| 14:22.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stefan27 (~stefan27@static-212-247-4-149.cust.tele2.se) |
| 14:36.39 | stefan27 | newbie question about the SIP protocol and asterisk again: When asterisk has received an INVITE SDP offer and has transmitted an answer with 200 OK; what kind of channel state is the chan_sip channel in until it has received the "ACK"? Is the channel considered 'Up' before the ACK is received, would it bridge rtp audio received from the remote end before the ACK is received? |
| 14:39.08 | stefan27 | (also where can I read the full rules about the semantics of "ACK" in INVITEs - are those rules dictated by RFC3261?) |
| 14:43.45 | file | it'd likely be up, it would pass media even before that, and yes |
| 14:48.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~Marquis42@d14-69-240-195.try.wideopenwest.com) |
| 14:48.15 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Marquis42] by ChanServ |
| 14:50.02 | stefan27 | thanks |
| 15:17.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tsearle (~tsearle@37.19.10.33) |
| 15:20.14 | cresl1n | rmudgett: there, it's done. |
| 15:20.25 | cresl1n | +2'd the rtp patch |
| 15:20.44 | rmudgett | :) |
| 15:21.05 | cresl1n | Can we get some eyeballs on t.38 support in the sdp layer from file? |
| 15:21.23 | cresl1n | putnopvut, rmudgett, gtjoseph |
| 15:21.55 | putnopvut | SURE THING MR FREDRICKSON |
| 15:22.40 | cresl1n | so enthusiastic :-) |
| 15:23.04 | file | No. |
| 15:24.09 | cresl1n | gives file a plate |
| 16:08.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-32-14.wall.uls.co.za) |
| 16:20.58 | file | gtjoseph: where do we go to download logs/backtraces/etc in Jenkins 2 |
| 16:21.30 | gtjoseph | should be the same place. they shoul dbe tarballed. let me check |
| 16:22.35 | gtjoseph | oh that's interesting. |
| 16:22.39 | gtjoseph | hmmm |
| 16:22.49 | file | add it to the list? |
| 16:23.17 | gtjoseph | yeah weird. they're being archived but not showing up on the ui. |
| 16:23.31 | gtjoseph | i'm trying to clean stuff up today |
| 16:42.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 17:40.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 18:20.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d006dc08d81ebd91123.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 18:34.14 | seanbright | whichever one of you decided that have a FILE * in the tcptls stuff... please step forwarf |
| 18:34.24 | seanbright | forward* |
| 18:34.29 | file | they are not here. |
| 18:35.10 | seanbright | well, they should be ashamed |
| 18:44.13 | rmudgett | Git blame will point the finger... |
| 18:48.00 | seanbright | i figured it out |
| 18:53.49 | cresl1n | gtjoseph: what exactly happened with https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/5343/ |
| 18:53.55 | cresl1n | oh |
| 18:53.58 | cresl1n | had a failure |
| 18:54.28 | gtjoseph | i'm monitoring those |
| 18:54.35 | cresl1n | is the sip failure an intermittent failure or is taht a problem? |
| 18:54.38 | cresl1n | ok |
| 18:54.40 | gtjoseph | and will merge as necessary |
| 18:54.51 | gtjoseph | the sip failure is a long standing one |
| 18:54.57 | gtjoseph | i think we have an issue open for it |
| 18:55.03 | gtjoseph | that's my weekend task though |
| 18:55.04 | cresl1n | good to know |
| 18:55.05 | cresl1n | ok |
| 18:55.48 | cresl1n | rmudgett: when you have a second can you look over file's t.38 patch on gerrit? |
| 18:56.23 | file | it's dependent on Mark's SDP merge thing, so it'll have to be rebased once that is sorted out |
| 18:58.24 | cresl1n | ok |
| 19:19.29 | seanbright | oh, looks like that FILE * was removed in master. splendid. |
| 19:42.14 | rmudgett | seanbright: TCP/TLS: We should really put forth an effort to remove that code in future versions. :) |
| 19:47.56 | seanbright | lulz |
| 19:48.37 | seanbright | rmudgett: fixed |
| 20:47.37 | leifmadsen | FRIDAY |
| 20:51.44 | file | is |
| 20:58.02 | rmudgett | as friday does |
| 21:00.04 | rmudgett | recheck |
| 21:00.33 | rmudgett | need more recheck |
| 21:09.34 | cresl1n | time to weekend |
| 21:09.37 | cresl1n | bye everybody! |
| 21:31.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 22:04.57 | rmudgett | file: Now to merge the T.38 patch into my branch. Those asserts really became ugly didn't they. |
| 22:05.03 | file | yes. |
| 22:05.19 | file | there are consequences to your comments. |
| 22:06.14 | rmudgett | Could have used #ifdef AST_DEVMODE instead |