| 02:34.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@208.53.50.136) |
| 02:34.35 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 03:13.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@208.53.50.136) |
| 03:13.14 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 06:59.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@unaffiliated/tuxd00d) |
| 07:41.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 08:25.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.126) |
| 08:34.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss (259d3426@gateway/web/freenode/ip.37.157.52.38) |
| 13:26.53 | seanbright | file: do you have specific thoughts on utility functions to translate between pj_sockaddr & ast_sockaddr without going into a string first? |
| 13:27.15 | file | I'm not against them? :D |
| 13:27.24 | seanbright | that's what i was looking for |
| 13:27.48 | seanbright | it would make them each less opaque and potentially prone to change |
| 13:27.58 | seanbright | although i assume pjsip won't be changing their side anytime soon |
| 13:34.52 | file | I think it is unlikely |
| 14:13.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-rhmdhhnvkzfpvwws) |
| 14:13.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 14:16.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-zgxfmqgyhcgwnpuo) |
| 14:16.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ |
| 14:26.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 14:26.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 14:57.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-koufguqbyrcnnvuc) |
| 14:57.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 15:14.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@unaffiliated/tuxd00d) |
| 16:34.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.173) |
| 16:41.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (uid27319@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dvvvenrbmwuhqmtd) |
| 17:31.15 | seanbright | looks forward to the beating he shall receive on r10013 |
| 17:31.33 | seanbright | i finally figured out how to get a feature i want into asterisk |
| 17:31.40 | seanbright | i just implement it poorly and put it up for review |
| 17:31.55 | seanbright | and then rmudgett and i iteratively fix it until it's done :{ |
| 17:31.58 | seanbright | err, :P |
| 18:28.28 | seanbright | question about keep alives: where is the double CRLF that we send specified? rfc5626 is the closest thing i could find |
| 18:29.42 | file | I don't know of an RFC for it explicitly |
| 18:55.39 | seanbright | are we at the point where we can remove https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/blob/master/utils/astdb2bdb.c |
| 18:55.43 | seanbright | and db1-ast |
| 18:56.11 | seanbright | are people still upgrading from bdb? |
| 18:56.18 | file | probably can, but for what reason? |
| 18:56.28 | seanbright | cuz |
| 18:56.40 | seanbright | is that compelling enough? |
| 18:56.49 | file | almost, almost |
| 18:57.10 | seanbright | how about we just change it to not compile by default? |
| 18:57.40 | file | points at cresl1n |
| 18:58.03 | seanbright | oh cresl1n |
| 18:58.31 | seanbright | just doing a fresh build and the first thing built is bdb and it annoyed me |
| 18:58.34 | seanbright | heh |
| 19:11.46 | coreyfarrell | astdb has useed sqlite3 since 10.0.0. I think providing the conversion utility for 3 LTS versions (11, 13 and 16) is more than enough. even if we don't want to remove astdb2sqlite3 yet it seems like astdb2dbd should be deleted (it goes the wrong way). |
| 19:13.35 | cresl1n | I'd not be opposed to removing the down migration version of the tool |
| 19:13.42 | cresl1n | But that'd probably be a master thing |
| 19:19.03 | coreyfarrell | cresl1n: so you think Asterisk 17 should continue offering astdb2sqlite3? could it be disabled by default? |
| 19:19.55 | cresl1n | is the reason you're asking do to a dependency problem? |
| 19:20.04 | cresl1n | s/do/due/ |
| 19:22.10 | coreyfarrell | nope, just a fan of deleting unneeded code. |
| 19:22.16 | cresl1n | Gotcha |
| 19:22.31 | coreyfarrell | so like seanbright my reason is "cuz". |
| 19:22.35 | cresl1n | :-) |
| 19:28.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (~dwayne@2605:a600:8050:5600:829d:1142:5677:7e57) |
| 19:28.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 20:26.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sduthil (~sduthil@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 20:28.19 | seanbright | ohhh. release day? |
| 20:28.39 | malcolmd | happy dance time |
| 20:29.57 | cresl1n | yessir |
| 20:33.36 | file | well, release candidates |
| 21:32.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev scgm11_ (~scgm11@187.192.163.69) |
| 21:41.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev scgm11_ (~scgm11@187.192.163.69) |
| 22:14.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sh_smith (~sh_smith@cpe-76-174-26-91.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 22:50.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev scgm11_ (~scgm11@187.192.163.69) |
| 23:01.54 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-rhmdhhnvkzfpvwws) |