| 06:11.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:b749:768d:ed77:7c9a) |
| 06:19.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82) |
| 09:04.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.53) |
| 11:32.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pc-m (~pcm@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 12:47.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 13:06.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ncuebctxdyguiwub) |
| 13:06.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 13:36.43 | seanbright | so based on my reading of the externalMedia patch, if it's not a static RTP payload, we can't use it |
| 13:36.46 | seanbright | is that correct? |
| 13:37.08 | gtjoseph | uhm, no. i don't think so. |
| 13:37.29 | gtjoseph | what makes you think that? |
| 13:37.38 | seanbright | well, there is no sdp |
| 13:38.05 | seanbright | so how are the payload codes negotation for non-static payloads? |
| 13:38.18 | seanbright | s/negotiation/communicated/ |
| 13:38.39 | gtjoseph | they're not. you _do_ have to know what to expect. |
| 13:38.40 | seanbright | (i know there is no negotiation) |
| 13:38.49 | seanbright | ok |
| 13:39.03 | gtjoseph | at the present time anyway |
| 13:39.08 | seanbright | maybe i don't understand rtp |
| 13:39.12 | seanbright | let me look at the code more |
| 13:39.45 | gtjoseph | it should just stream out whatever format you specified when you created the external media channel. |
| 13:40.11 | file | what seanbright is getting at is, under what payload? |
| 13:40.13 | seanbright | right, so if you stream out ulaw, it will use payload code 0 |
| 13:40.20 | seanbright | what if you stream out opus? |
| 13:40.35 | gtjoseph | i haven't tried it tbh. |
| 13:40.37 | seanbright | k |
| 13:40.57 | gtjoseph | it _should_ work. I can test it right now. |
| 13:41.01 | seanbright | heh |
| 13:41.04 | gtjoseph | gimme a min |
| 13:41.05 | seanbright | i don't doubt it will work |
| 13:44.33 | seanbright | i have to assume it will be somewhere between 96 and 127 |
| 13:45.05 | gtjoseph | tell you in a sec |
| 13:45.06 | file | indeed |
| 14:15.50 | gtjoseph | stupid typos in my test script. anyway... |
| 14:16.27 | gtjoseph | type 107 |
| 14:16.31 | gtjoseph | opus that is |
| 14:16.51 | seanbright | ok |
| 14:17.25 | seanbright | i assume there is code somewhere in the formats stuff that does that mapping? |
| 14:17.39 | gtjoseph | it may be in rtp |
| 14:17.44 | file | rtp_engine.c |
| 14:17.46 | gtjoseph | for the dynamic stuff |
| 14:18.00 | seanbright | sure enough |
| 14:18.19 | gtjoseph | we'll be doing another encapsulation shortly that will have a better header |
| 14:18.30 | seanbright | what is that? |
| 14:18.54 | gtjoseph | well bford is working on audiosocket right now. |
| 14:19.22 | seanbright | you said better |
| 14:19.25 | seanbright | i heard it |
| 14:19.45 | gtjoseph | let me put it this way... we can make it naything we want. |
| 14:19.57 | seanbright | ok, super secret project, got it |
| 14:20.08 | seanbright | probably commercial, i'm probably annoyed, bob's your uncle |
| 14:20.13 | seanbright | heh |
| 14:20.18 | gtjoseph | nope. it's in gerrit now. |
| 14:20.20 | file | unless it's so secret I don't even know about it... |
| 14:20.35 | seanbright | ok, so that i am clear... |
| 14:20.41 | gtjoseph | it's seà n mccords thing |
| 14:20.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (uid358942@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-srdchkjooqcqjchu) |
| 14:20.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 14:20.57 | seanbright | "we'll be doing another encapsulation" => "we'll be doing audiosocket encapsulation" |
| 14:21.03 | seanbright | yes? |
| 14:21.10 | gtjoseph | yes |
| 14:21.13 | seanbright | got it |
| 14:21.22 | seanbright | i read it as there was _third_ one coming |
| 14:22.00 | gtjoseph | there will be. i'm thinking about what an "ari" encapsulation might look like. |
| 14:22.12 | seanbright | like... websocket frames? |
| 14:22.47 | gtjoseph | possibly.but maybe just over udp or tcp to start |
| 14:22.59 | seanbright | interesting |
| 14:23.12 | gtjoseph | or maybe websocket to start. not sure what the transport would be. |
| 14:23.22 | seanbright | what about realaudio encapsulation? |
| 14:23.28 | gtjoseph | i'm just thinking about what we'd want in a packet header |
| 14:23.49 | gtjoseph | sorry. i can't roll back time to the '90s |
| 14:24.02 | seanbright | in terms what what you'd want in a packet header, i have some ideas on that |
| 14:24.14 | gtjoseph | sure send them my way. |
| 14:24.22 | seanbright | https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3550#section-5.1 |
| 14:24.32 | seanbright | let me know what you think |
| 14:24.33 | seanbright | :P |
| 14:24.49 | gtjoseph | Ha! |
| 14:25.37 | gtjoseph | I was thinking things like channel id, bridge id, format, opaque data, etc. |
| 14:30.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@static-71-174-102-211.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 14:41.58 | seanbright | call it... IAX3 |
| 14:46.13 | gtjoseph | we were thinking about that |
| 14:46.17 | gtjoseph | don't laugh |
| 14:46.26 | file | wat |
| 14:46.27 | gtjoseph | (but we're not any more) |
| 14:47.20 | seanbright | well, i love iax, so thanks for getting my hopes up |
| 16:44.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tsearle (tsearlehac@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-tgzgovdnntuobjjg) |
| 16:44.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tsearle] by ChanServ |
| 18:01.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00f4d7ddd1bc0987bc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |