| 01:08.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 05:57.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev coreyfarrell (~coreyfarr@68-114-57-249.dhcp.davl.vt.charter.com) |
| 05:57.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o coreyfarrell] by ChanServ |
| 06:03.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 06:11.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.126) |
| 07:14.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:b749:768d:ed77:7c9a) |
| 07:24.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82) |
| 07:33.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-217-33-206.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 07:36.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-217-33-206.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 09:42.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 11:08.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.110) |
| 11:45.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_1 (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:b749:768d:ed77:7c9a) |
| 11:49.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:b749:768d:ed77:7c9a) |
| 12:51.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pc-m (~pcm@ipagstaticip-cf899324-841a-2614-948a-7dbf21746b29.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 13:21.58 | coreyfarrell | is there any policy (official or otherwise) on new features to chan_sip? |
| 13:22.29 | file | nothing really, but I'd personally discourage touching chan_sip at all costs |
| 13:23.39 | coreyfarrell | "chan_sip is fragile and has no active maintainers. Personally I think new features do not belong in chan_sip, should instead be implemented for chan_pjsip." -- is that a reasonable response to the most recent message on asterisk-dev? |
| 13:23.57 | file | yes |
| 13:37.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev andresalo (~andres.al@223.red-83-61-5.staticip.rima-tde.net) |
| 13:48.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sahmed (~sahmed@cpe-70-114-236-63.austin.res.rr.com) |
| 15:16.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 15:16.06 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ |
| 15:22.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (uid358942@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-bqzqjmurtmtedpsl) |
| 15:22.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 15:27.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ziiwmiulluwfrdlw) |
| 15:27.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 15:46.02 | seanbright | gtjoseph: something for you if you get bored... i can't build 13 with bundled pjproject if i enable the UB sanitizer |
| 15:46.34 | seanbright | i can't work out how all of the bundled stuff works, so i'm not quite sure how to fix |
| 15:46.45 | gtjoseph | really? |
| 15:46.47 | gtjoseph | hmmm. |
| 15:46.56 | seanbright | yeah, the other sanitizers work fine |
| 15:47.05 | seanbright | it fails when it tries to build the pjsip-apps stuff |
| 15:47.33 | gtjoseph | are you talking about the undefined sanitizer? |
| 15:47.44 | seanbright | yes |
| 15:47.57 | seanbright | is it not called the UB sanitizer? |
| 15:48.05 | seanbright | UBSan |
| 15:48.12 | seanbright | undefined behavior sanitizer |
| 15:48.24 | seanbright | this conversation is now undefined behavior |
| 15:48.37 | gtjoseph | was looking in menuselect :) |
| 15:48.40 | seanbright | gotcha |
| 15:48.50 | gtjoseph | but yes we're talking about the same one. |
| 15:49.03 | gtjoseph | i know the leak and address ones work as i use them all the time. |
| 15:49.11 | gtjoseph | i'll check on UB |
| 15:50.24 | seanbright | thanks |
| 15:52.06 | *** part/#asterisk-dev sahmed (~sahmed@cpe-70-114-236-63.austin.res.rr.com) |
| 15:52.21 | gtjoseph | yeah it fails. thankfully it's only in pjsua and not the libs themselves. |
| 15:55.05 | gtjoseph | oh. it's when it links pjsua to the libs. that's when it shows up all the issues in the libs. :( |
| 15:55.51 | seanbright | so i did something to get it to work... one sec |
| 15:56.22 | seanbright | in this file: third-party/pjproject/source/build/rules.mak |
| 15:56.49 | seanbright | i added '-fsanitize=undefined' to the ld call in the 'ifneq ($(EXE),)' block |
| 15:56.58 | seanbright | and it worked |
| 15:57.14 | seanbright | obviously less than ideal |
| 15:57.20 | gtjoseph | hmmm. i wonder if we're not passing down the correct flag |
| 15:57.40 | seanbright | which would be weird because why would the UB sanitizer be any different? |
| 15:57.51 | gtjoseph | hmmm. i wonder if we're not passing down the correct flag |
| 15:57.57 | seanbright | which would be weird because why would the UB sanitizer be any different? |
| 15:57.59 | gtjoseph | and there some mismatch somewhere |
| 15:58.27 | gtjoseph | i just build without --devmode and it worked. |
| 16:05.22 | seanbright | interesting |
| 16:06.36 | gtjoseph | its quite possible that without devmode the option isn't being used. |
| 16:06.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dakudos (~dakudos@2607:fb90:6ed5:4122:f453:5bca:adef:9a50) |
| 16:14.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sduthil (~sduthil@ipagstaticip-cf899324-841a-2614-948a-7dbf21746b29.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 16:18.37 | gtjoseph | seanbright: the domain_name issue is weird. i also compile with 9.2.1 and it should have been caught. |
| 16:19.09 | seanbright | maybe the additional sanitize flags are doing something? |
| 16:19.49 | gtjoseph | i would have thought that an unitialized error would be thrown before the sanitizer even kicks in. |
| 16:19.56 | seanbright | i don't disagree |
| 16:58.35 | gtjoseph | seanbright: i created https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28622 on your behalf. |
| 17:00.20 | seanbright | thanks pal |
| 17:00.31 | seanbright | i've assigned you on my behalf |
| 17:00.32 | seanbright | :P |
| 19:06.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00f4d7ddd1bc0987bc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 19:16.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@anantes-655-1-124-21.w90-59.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 19:28.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sduthil (~sduthil@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 19:54.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cresl1n (uid299068@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 19:54.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 20:00.09 | gtjoseph | reminder to folks on my construct.protocols reviews...do NOT +2 them. that has to be coordinated with docker image changes |