| 00:13.44 | *** join/#asterisk-doc locksy (n=locksy@mrtg.sisgroup.com.au) |
| 13:42.27 | *** join/#asterisk-doc TK9 (n=Miranda@p54B2AC84.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 14:24.34 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MatsK (n=mk@3.80-203-81.nextgentel.com) |
| 16:28.37 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith (n=jsmith@64.0.193.140) |
| 16:28.37 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 17:19.22 | blitzrage | jsmith: morning! |
| 17:21.44 | jsmith | Good morning blitzrage |
| 17:25.37 | blitzrage | oh! check with your boss about some old computers too |
| 17:25.48 | blitzrage | you know what I'm talking about :D |
| 17:34.11 | jsmith | Yeah, I'm working that angle as well. |
| 17:34.37 | blitzrage | niiiiice |
| 17:34.46 | blitzrage | "but boss... I'm leaving and you said I could have some :)" |
| 17:35.12 | jsmith | Exactly. |
| 17:35.25 | jsmith | The only things that haven't been decided is "when" and "how much" |
| 17:35.39 | blitzrage | oh I see :D |
| 17:35.51 | blitzrage | isn't that pretty much the only things that ever needed to be figured out :) |
| 17:35.56 | blitzrage | othar than that you COULD buy some |
| 17:36.17 | blitzrage | but I'm finding I need to put myself a nice lab together... |
| 17:36.22 | blitzrage | ideally 3 computers |
| 17:37.09 | blitzrage | you can pretty much create most toplogies with 3 computers... 4 is more ideal because then you can use the 4th as the "provider" |
| 17:53.19 | jsmith | Yup. |
| 17:53.39 | jsmith | I found some nice used Dell rackmount servers at a local store yesterday... |
| 17:53.48 | jsmith | They were only $1500 a piece :-( |
| 17:53.54 | blitzrage | ouch |
| 17:54.07 | blitzrage | I'm thinking that much MAX for all 4 :) |
| 17:54.08 | jsmith | Yeah... |
| 17:54.18 | blitzrage | ideally like $200 each... |
| 17:54.26 | blitzrage | well.. ideally free :) |
| 17:54.27 | jsmith | Yeah... |
| 17:54.32 | jsmith | I hear you there. |
| 17:54.35 | jsmith | I'll see what I can do. |
| 17:54.44 | blitzrage | realistically $200 each :) or less |
| 17:55.10 | blitzrage | coolio |
| 19:32.18 | *** join/#asterisk-doc Alric (n=nbowyer@masq.hyperusa.com) |
| 20:56.21 | jsmith | Alric: Question for you... |
| 20:56.37 | jsmith | Alric: What's the cheap Cisco IP phone that still talks SIP -- the 7912? |
| 21:00.01 | blitzrage | jsmith: are you thinking the SPA941? |
| 21:00.07 | blitzrage | its about $130 |
| 21:00.24 | blitzrage | http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=1202&osCsid=b58e75576274e1c5b11d9256c6068144 |
| 21:01.01 | jsmith | blitzrage: No, the SPA-941 doesn't have a second ethernet port. |
| 21:01.07 | jsmith | blitzrage: Otherwise, I'd be all over them. |
| 21:01.07 | blitzrage | really? that sucks |
| 21:01.27 | jsmith | Yeah, notice how the Sipura SPA-841s don't either?!? |
| 21:01.33 | jsmith | Same guts, different body. |
| 21:01.41 | blitzrage | makes sense... guess there is no SPA942 |
| 21:01.55 | blitzrage | yah.. I knew they were the same phone :) |
| 21:02.16 | jsmith | Yeah, no SPA-942 |
| 21:02.19 | jsmith | At least not yet. |
| 21:02.22 | jsmith | :-( |
| 21:02.37 | jsmith | Oh well, I'll suggest they buy Polycom IP-501s. |
| 21:02.47 | blitzrage | aye |
| 21:03.09 | jsmith | That is, if I had one to get the configuration all setup on :-) |
| 21:03.16 | blitzrage | the 7912 does have the bridge |
| 21:03.27 | jsmith | Hmmmn.. and it does SIP? |
| 21:04.11 | blitzrage | jsmith: :D maybe we'll try to find one when in Cali |
| 21:04.14 | blitzrage | ompatible with Cisco CallManager Version 3.3(2) and later, using the Skinny Client Control Protocol (SCCP) protocol SIP (RFC 2543) |
| 21:04.20 | jsmith | :-( |
| 21:04.27 | blitzrage | notice SIP as well |
| 21:10.48 | jsmith | Anybody have a good supplier for Polycoms? |
| 21:11.38 | blitzrage | ask [TK]D-Fender in #asterisk |
| 21:11.41 | blitzrage | he might know |
| 21:12.52 | jsmith | Who is he? |
| 21:13.42 | blitzrage | I met him at the Meet Asterisk in Montreal -- and he uses Polycoms a lot |
| 21:13.47 | blitzrage | I'll just ask for you |
| 21:20.20 | blitzrage | jsmith: do you know if you can run Asterisk in xen? |
| 21:23.07 | blitzrage | http://www.ccpin.com <<-- try that for polycom |
| 21:24.40 | jsmith | blitzrage: I don't see why not -- you'd probably have problems talking to the Digium hardware though. |
| 21:25.01 | blitzrage | thats fine... I don't think I'd need hardware for testing most bugs |
| 21:25.17 | blitzrage | I'm thinking that having a server where people could come in and test bugs would be cool... |
| 21:25.30 | blitzrage | dedicate a "server" to each person who I assigned to |
| 21:26.01 | blitzrage | or use it locally to keep bug patches and tests separate |
| 21:28.19 | jsmith | Yeah... |
| 22:12.59 | Alric | 7912 does SIP, and has as switch port |
| 22:13.08 | Alric | I hate them though. |
| 22:13.38 | Alric | I wouldn't buy them, personally. |
| 22:24.49 | jsmith | OK... that solves that problem then. |
| 22:24.50 | jsmith | Next! |
| 22:25.13 | Alric | What problem? |
| 22:26.50 | Alric | My problems with the 7912 are: it doesn't understand differences in DST (that I've been able to find out), so you have to manually increment / deincrement the timezone to manually adjust (hellua bad for management). They have no XML interface, and their SIP stack is a bit different (worse, imo) from the 7940/7960, and their config files are compiled, so making changes is even worse :) |
| 22:34.11 | blitzrage | it says it uses RFC2543... thats probably the reason |
| 22:34.20 | blitzrage | thats an old RFC |
| 22:40.38 | jsmith | blitzrage: FYI -- http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsajax/ looks interesting |
| 22:41.17 | Alric | The DST thing is the most annoying. |
| 22:41.32 | Alric | Its more recent the 7940/7960, but its software is vastly inferior. |
| 22:45.30 | blitzrage | jsmith: oooooo |
| 22:46.01 | jsmith | blitzrage: I thought you'd like that... |
| 22:57.45 | *** join/#asterisk-doc ToTo (n=ToTo@host56-162.pool875.interbusiness.it) |
| 23:00.04 | blitzrage | jsmith: have you looked at the XML? I think we still need some more info to be able to "generate" a book |
| 23:16.05 | jsmith | blitzrage: Haven't... been swamped |
| 23:16.18 | blitzrage | understandable |
| 23:22.54 | jsmith | blitzrage: Doesn't look that bad to me |
| 23:23.59 | blitzrage | looks good... just not sure if it contains all the info we need to create an HTML document from it... I think we still need a file... forget what its called... like a format file or something... its been a while since I did DocBook |
| 23:30.02 | jsmith | Yeah, but that shouldn't be impossible... we may even be able to use some of the svnbook work |
| 23:33.28 | blitzrage | quite true |
| 23:33.40 | blitzrage | probably same file (what is that word I'm trying to think of?) |