| 04:14.04 | *** join/#asterisk-doc file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 04:20.40 | *** join/#asterisk-doc file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 12:06.16 | *** join/#asterisk-doc snuff-home (i=snuff@60-240-117-7-nsw-pppoe.tpgi.com.au) |
| 12:56.56 | *** join/#asterisk-doc ctooley (n=ctooley@209.33.106.198) |
| 13:48.02 | *** join/#asterisk-doc lmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:48.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 15:17.06 | Juggie | mooooo |
| 15:25.36 | jsmith | Good Moooooorning, Juggie |
| 15:47.23 | Juggie | eugh... i'd rather be sleeping |
| 16:00.45 | *** join/#asterisk-doc wwalker (n=wwalker@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/wwalker) |
| 16:03.13 | wwalker | is there any documentation on SipAddHeader? http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+SIPAddHeader is awfully vague. Do I just "SipAddHeader("X-Meetme-Args: SXiAa")" then Dial, then on the meetme server "Set(meetme_args=SIP_HEADER(X-Meetme-Args))" |
| 16:04.15 | jsmith | wwalker: Yeah, it's pretty much that easy... |
| 16:08.27 | wwalker | jsmith: thank you |
| 17:22.36 | wwalker | <PROTECTED> |
| 17:22.48 | wwalker | [Apr 3 12:03:21] DEBUG[19928]: chan_sip.c:4835 parse_request: Header 12: X-Meetme-Args: (15) |
| 17:25.59 | ctooley | wwalker, can you crank up the verbosity and see exactly how SipAddHeader is being called inside of asterisk? |
| 17:26.16 | Juggie | wonders why SIP_HEADER() is read only. |
| 17:26.48 | ctooley | Juggie, writing to some headers is dangerous? |
| 17:27.06 | ctooley | has thought of submitting a patch to allow that for a while. |
| 17:27.08 | Juggie | but its the same as SipAddHeader |
| 17:27.30 | ctooley | Juggie, you can't "replace" a header with SipAddHeader. It just tacks them on. |
| 17:27.49 | Juggie | ah ic. |
| 17:28.41 | Juggie | well you could easily add that restriction to sip_header |
| 17:28.48 | Juggie | just dont allow setting of an existing header |
| 17:29.23 | ctooley | Juggie, but I would prefer to be able to do header changes in the dialplan as well. I'm going to be digging deep in chan_sip again, I might look at a write version of SIP_HEADER() as well. It's something that I'm having to do the hard way at the moment. |
| 17:30.35 | ctooley | Modifying some of the header's can allow for some pretty good flexibility as well. |
| 17:30.51 | ctooley | But, it's also reaching a bit outside the original realm of Asterisk. |
| 17:31.29 | ctooley | wwalker, and I both work for Excel, and we stretch the "original realm" of Asterisk pretty much every day anyway. |
| 17:31.31 | jsmith | ctooley: You could always set an arbitrary SIP header, then have your SIP proxy rewrite the response with the appropriate SIP response. |
| 17:31.51 | ctooley | jsmith, you're assuming we aren't abusing Asterisk to be our proxy. |
| 17:32.06 | jsmith | ctooley: Yes, I am making that assumption. I know you too well ;-) |
| 17:32.13 | ctooley | :) |
| 17:32.31 | ctooley | If you know me so well, why would you make the assumption? |
| 17:32.53 | jsmith | I refuse to answer that in public ;-) |
| 17:32.59 | ctooley | hahaha |
| 17:39.52 | ctooley | jsmith, Besides, if I have a proxy do it, I have to put intelligence in more than one place. |
| 17:40.41 | jsmith | ctooley: Some people might suggest that putting all of your intelligence eggs in one basket might be unwise |
| 17:40.52 | jsmith | doesn't really care, as long as it works and works well |
| 17:42.18 | ctooley | Depends on your definition of a basket. I see little value of running a separate technology on a different server just for the sake of it being a different technology. Especially since if worst comes to worst, the way we have it set up, the Proxy can become an active call server. |
| 17:44.34 | ctooley | Reheated Chinese food with a block of reheated "rice" and for desert a fresh brownie. |
| 17:44.50 | ctooley | I might just skip lunch, eat the desert and hope supper is better. |
| 17:45.16 | Juggie | does it360 provide any food i wonder |
| 17:45.19 | Juggie | i guess they do lunches |
| 17:47.46 | Juggie | and for a change mark's keynote is @ 12:10 |
| 17:47.50 | Juggie | not 9am |
| 17:48.02 | Juggie | so i might actually see it for a change :) |
| 17:49.13 | file | I wouldn't bet on that... |
| 17:50.49 | ctooley | By 12:10 I'm so hungry I never get to see anyone |
| 17:51.10 | Juggie | file haha, why woudnt you bet on that |
| 17:51.15 | Juggie | i can be awake and ready by 12:10 :) |
| 17:51.23 | file | uh huh |
| 17:52.10 | Juggie | pish! |
| 17:52.28 | Juggie | these trips might be work for yo, but they are vacations for me! :) |
| 17:53.29 | ctooley | During Astricon last year we rolled out 2 different Asterisk platforms and 2 new core database servers on the crappy connection in Phoenix. They're always work for me. :( |
| 17:54.08 | ctooley | It did help that we did it at 2AM, so I was moving pretty slow for my presentation the next day, I almost filled my entire timeslot. |
| 17:54.14 | lmadsen | Juggie: ya, I wouldn't mind actually attending the conference this year :) |
| 17:55.13 | Juggie | there wont be a problem w/ internet in toronto |
| 17:55.28 | Juggie | MTCC is million times better then any astericon venue i've been to |
| 17:55.35 | Juggie | *astricon |
| 17:56.11 | ctooley | Oh come on. The hotel in Dallas was luxurious and in a great location. :) |
| 17:57.04 | Juggie | lmadsen, whats the internet hub in TO called again |
| 17:57.07 | Juggie | the peering building |
| 17:57.36 | lmadsen | 151 Front? |
| 17:57.42 | Juggie | whats it called though |
| 17:57.46 | lmadsen | couldn't tell ya... |
| 17:58.11 | Juggie | http://www.151frontstreet.com/ |
| 17:58.12 | lmadsen | I asked tzanger for ya though |
| 17:58.25 | lmadsen | hehe... just called 151 front I guess :) |
| 18:00.13 | ctooley | Hmmm, have you guys ever been in there |
| 18:01.27 | Juggie | no |
| 18:01.33 | Juggie | but its like a block from the mtcc |
| 18:03.06 | ctooley | I'm always on the lookout for good carrier hotel's |
| 18:03.16 | ctooley | I'm really needing one in Mexico City. |
| 18:03.19 | Juggie | they are likely the best in toronto |
| 18:03.28 | Juggie | best in canada, its own mostly by bell i believe |
| 18:03.39 | Juggie | *owned |
| 18:04.54 | ctooley | Terming traffic to Mexico is a lot more difficult for us than terming it to Canada, but we're mostly riding peering agreements to get there. |
| 18:06.01 | Juggie | http://www.torix.net/stats.php |
| 18:06.34 | ctooley | I wonder if GX could get us a new GigE from 350 E Cermack to 151 Front. |
| 18:06.45 | ctooley | Might have to come from one of our NYC sites though. |
| 18:07.16 | ctooley | CHI2 is a primary site for us though, might be better coming from there. |
| 18:07.24 | Juggie | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Internet_Exchange |
| 18:10.37 | ctooley | Yeah, that Torix isn't really what we're looking for. We route call traffic, not internet. :) |
| 18:11.07 | ctooley | We'd tack up our own space in the meetme and do carrier interconnect, just like in 350 Cermack. |
| 18:17.16 | Juggie | torix is just layer too |
| 18:17.23 | Juggie | 2 |
| 18:17.34 | Juggie | a building full of network cables and ac'ed rooms |
| 18:23.23 | ctooley | Torix just rents space from 151 Front. Just like the Equinox facilities. |
| 18:23.57 | ctooley | They seem relatively new though, having just broke the 7Gbps mark. |
| 18:24.30 | Juggie | 10Gbps |
| 18:24.34 | ctooley | not that 7Gbps is a small mark |
| 18:24.52 | Juggie | 151front is torix |
| 18:25.34 | ctooley | The Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is an Internet Exchange Point located in a carrier hotel at 151 Front Street West |
| 18:26.44 | Juggie | ya i guess... the carrier hotel just doesnt do internet |
| 18:26.46 | Juggie | does phones, etc... |
| 18:26.57 | Juggie | alot of phone calls run through 151 |
| 18:31.09 | ctooley | yeah |
| 18:33.12 | Juggie | anyways its a good building |
| 18:36.38 | ctooley | yeah, looks like it. |
| 18:36.51 | ctooley | Wish I could got to IT368 |
| 18:36.59 | ctooley | *IT360 |
| 19:36.32 | Juggie | zzzz |
| 19:40.43 | Juggie | cant wait for tomorow to be over |
| 19:40.49 | wwalker | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:40.52 | wwalker | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:40.55 | wwalker | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:41.01 | wwalker | <PROTECTED> |
| 19:41.18 | wwalker | -- AGI Script Executing Application: (SipAddHeader) Options: (X-Meetme-Args|IMwsaAx) |
| 19:41.24 | wwalker | sorry |
| 19:54.15 | ctooley | turn on sip debugging for the peer you're sending the request to and see what the header looks like in the SIP message. "sip set debug peer PEERNAME" |
| 20:29.15 | wwalker | [Apr 3 12:03:21] DEBUG[19928]: chan_sip.c:4835 parse_request: Header 12: X-Meetme-Args: (15) |
| 20:44.04 | wwalker | I've tried 3 different ways and none of them work right. does anyone know how I should be formatting this? http://rafb.net/p/ysqyZC42.html |
| 20:44.37 | wwalker | The second one (with a PIPE, and NO space) at least passes the argument,b ut includes the PIPE as part of the value :( |
| 20:50.16 | ctooley | have you tried replacing the | with a comma? |
| 20:50.43 | ctooley | notes that this channel is known for making obvious comments. :) |
| 20:52.49 | wwalker | ARG!!!!!! |
| 20:53.27 | wwalker | SipAddHeader("X-Meetme-Args:SXiAa") - NO DELIMITER AT ALL no space, no comma, no pipe. |
| 20:54.23 | wwalker | adding a space apaprently ends the value |
| 21:00.21 | jsmith | wwalker: Yeah, that seems like a bug |
| 21:00.39 | jsmith | (at least to little ol' me) |
| 21:13.02 | ctooley | I haven't looked to AddHeader for a while. But, by RFC the spec says that the : is the separator between the key and value and a space is something that while most implementations support is not part of the header format. |
| 21:13.29 | ctooley | There's some implementations of SIP that will not support spaces after the colon. |
| 21:35.18 | wwalker | teach me to learn SMTP first. |
| 21:37.23 | ctooley | ;) |
| 21:46.48 | lmadsen | ctooley: if you moved to 151 front, and all else failed, you could always call me to walk down there too :) |
| 21:47.15 | ctooley | We wouldn't move there, we'd just potentially add another pop |
| 21:47.29 | ctooley | We don't have any pop's outside the domestic 48 right now though. |
| 21:47.40 | lmadsen | gotcha |
| 21:47.50 | ctooley | And we're pretty set on Digital Realty Trust where we can use them. |
| 21:48.03 | lmadsen | welp, gona try and make some food quick before brit gets here and we go rollerblading |
| 21:48.06 | ctooley | Though we do have a few that aren't DRT |
| 21:48.34 | ctooley | bah all that outdoorsy activity without killing something along the way is bound to lead to a long healthy life. |