| 00:43.00 | leifmadsen | Juggie: pong? |
| 05:30.57 | Juggie | meh |
| 05:31.06 | Juggie | ack slightly late. |
| 11:21.41 | leifmadsen | pong (re-transmit #2) |
| 12:07.52 | leifmadsen | jsmith: ping |
| 12:31.44 | *** join/#asterisk-doc eliel (n=eliels@200.61.172.61) |
| 12:45.21 | leifmadsen | eliel: !!! |
| 12:45.31 | leifmadsen | eliel: is there a <ref type="manager"> ? |
| 12:45.43 | leifmadsen | I looked at the DTD and didn't see it -- and wasn't sure if manpage was right |
| 12:45.46 | leifmadsen | I presumed it wasn't |
| 12:45.55 | eliel | not yet, because we need to define how to show it in the CLI |
| 12:45.59 | leifmadsen | gotcha |
| 12:46.08 | leifmadsen | ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything for see-also |
| 12:47.11 | eliel | we can use ActionName(AMI) or AMI:ActionName or Action:ActionName |
| 12:47.18 | eliel | if we define this adding that is trivial |
| 12:48.53 | leifmadsen | gotcha |
| 12:48.59 | leifmadsen | well we can do that after getting the rest of these docs updated |
| 12:49.05 | eliel | ok |
| 12:49.14 | leifmadsen | because I'm going to have to go through and update and fix a whole bunch of stuff -- some things don't have descriptions, etc.... |
| 12:49.24 | leifmadsen | we might think about adding <example> as well |
| 12:49.33 | leifmadsen | and not showing that by default, but only on the CLI when you do |
| 12:49.43 | leifmadsen | core show application dial example |
| 12:49.54 | leifmadsen | or 'core show example Dial' |
| 12:50.08 | leifmadsen | then we can write up a dialplan snippet to show an example of how to use the application |
| 12:50.29 | leifmadsen | (btw: I prefer 'core show example <application>' |
| 12:50.30 | leifmadsen | ) |
| 12:50.31 | eliel | i agree |
| 12:50.38 | leifmadsen | seems straight forward |
| 12:50.59 | leifmadsen | would just be <example><para>...</para></example> |
| 12:51.00 | leifmadsen | I think |
| 12:51.06 | eliel | me too because core show application allows multiple application names <appname1> <appname2> ... |
| 12:51.12 | leifmadsen | ah yes |
| 12:51.29 | leifmadsen | ok, then motion passed on 'core show example' :) |
| 12:51.49 | eliel | core show application example |
| 12:51.57 | eliel | unless there is one applicatoin called example :) |
| 12:52.03 | eliel | core show function example |
| 12:52.07 | leifmadsen | that's what I had thought of |
| 12:52.18 | leifmadsen | core show example application Dial |
| 12:52.24 | leifmadsen | core show example function SIPPEER |
| 12:52.36 | leifmadsen | core show example manager Action |
| 13:00.35 | leifmadsen | eliel: so, question -- how should I handle the code changes when I convert the res_musiconhold.c stuff to AstXML ? |
| 13:00.45 | leifmadsen | they just seem to be pointers for the description |
| 13:04.40 | eliel | i don't know why they are not const |
| 13:04.58 | leifmadsen | they are deprecated it seems |
| 13:04.58 | leifmadsen | so they are just pointers... or something |
| 13:05.00 | leifmadsen | I have no idea how I should modify them >) |
| 13:05.01 | leifmadsen | :)* |
| 13:05.52 | eliel | it is the same |
| 13:06.04 | eliel | don't worry, just remove those pointers and put the docs in the xml |
| 13:06.09 | leifmadsen | ok |
| 13:06.11 | leifmadsen | will do that |
| 13:08.17 | *** join/#asterisk-doc ctooley (n=ctooley@74-46-117-97.dr01.clmb.ne.frontiernet.net) |
| 13:27.55 | leifmadsen | eliel: |
| 13:27.57 | leifmadsen | res_musiconhold.c:1682: error: play_moh undeclared (first use in this function) |
| 13:27.57 | leifmadsen | res_musiconhold.c:1682: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once |
| 13:27.57 | leifmadsen | res_musiconhold.c:1682: error: for each function it appears in.) |
| 13:29.29 | eliel | do not remove the applications name (play_moh, wait_moh, set_moh, ...), only descriptions and synopsis, sorry i didn't say that before |
| 13:30.47 | leifmadsen | I only have this... |
| 13:30.49 | leifmadsen | -static char *play_moh_syn = "Play Music On Hold indefinitely"; |
| 13:30.59 | leifmadsen | -static char *play_moh_desc = " MusicOnHold(class[,duration]):\n" |
| 13:31.12 | leifmadsen | do I just make it "" ? |
| 13:32.07 | leifmadsen | oh and this |
| 13:32.08 | leifmadsen | -static char *play_moh_desc = " MusicOnHold(class[,duration]):\n" |
| 13:32.10 | leifmadsen | oops |
| 13:32.17 | leifmadsen | static char *play_moh = "MusicOnHold"; |
| 13:32.30 | leifmadsen | just make it... |
| 13:32.35 | leifmadsen | static char *play_moh |
| 13:34.16 | eliel | svn diff and pastebin it will be easy to me |
| 13:34.53 | leifmadsen | I think I got it |
| 13:36.00 | eliel | ok |
| 13:36.45 | leifmadsen | heh... nice |
| 13:36.48 | leifmadsen | no errors on compile now |
| 13:36.52 | leifmadsen | is a real programmer! |
| 13:36.54 | leifmadsen | lol |
| 13:38.37 | leifmadsen | eliel: ok, check res_musiconhold.c when you have a chance -- I think that's right |
| 13:39.12 | eliel | ok, tomorrow i will commit all your code, today i will work in the gsoc project |
| 13:39.58 | leifmadsen | np |
| 13:40.07 | leifmadsen | I should have all the apps done this morning |
| 13:41.18 | eliel | great! |
| 13:44.07 | leifmadsen | moves onto ExternalIVR |
| 13:52.45 | leifmadsen | eliel: oh yuck... ExternalIVR syntax is going to be confusing for me -- I'll leave it for you for now :) |
| 13:55.16 | eliel | ok no problem |
| 16:12.40 | *** join/#asterisk-doc leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 16:12.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 17:14.29 | *** join/#asterisk-doc leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 17:14.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 17:47.45 | *** join/#asterisk-doc ToTo (n=ToTo@host174-151-dynamic.21-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 17:50.16 | *** join/#asterisk-doc waltervargas (n=usuario@190.207.69.66) |
| 17:50.19 | waltervargas | hi |
| 17:50.35 | waltervargas | anybody test Asterisk1.6 with res_ldap |
| 17:50.37 | waltervargas | ? |
| 17:52.50 | leifmadsen | waltervargas: I haven't -- this question you're going to ask is probably appropriate for #asterisk |
| 18:40.34 | leifmadsen | Juggie: ping? |
| 19:01.36 | jsmith-teaching | eliel: Ping? (re: syntax generator) |
| 19:01.50 | eliel | here |
| 19:08.55 | eliel | jsmith-teaching: pong |
| 19:09.38 | jsmith-teaching | eliel: Two questions... do I need to worry about reverse mode for parameters with argument nodes? |
| 19:10.20 | eliel | yes, to parse an argument you use the same logic as parsing a syntax node, reuse code |
| 19:10.24 | eliel | (or duplicate it) |
| 19:10.44 | jsmith-teaching | OK... |
| 19:10.59 | jsmith-teaching | I'll do that |
| 19:11.07 | jsmith-teaching | I've forgotten my second question now :-( |
| 19:12.08 | eliel | no problem, i will be here |
| 21:12.54 | jsmith-teaching | eliel: I remembered my other question |
| 21:13.08 | eliel | here |
| 21:13.12 | jsmith-teaching | eliel: Look at the output of "core show application VoiceMail", please |
| 21:13.33 | jsmith-teaching | eliel: Why is "options" the only parameter listed under [Arguments]? |
| 21:27.35 | eliel | because all the other argument don't have any documentation explaining them |
| 21:27.57 | eliel | in Argument we show parameters when we have more documentation to show |
| 21:37.42 | jsmith | Wouldn't it be better to show all of them, and just write something like (no description) |
| 21:37.44 | jsmith | I think that will encourage people to help out with the desciptions |
| 21:55.23 | *** join/#asterisk-doc waltervargas (n=usuario@190.207.69.66) |
| 22:00.53 | leifmadsen | jsmith-away: I agree |
| 23:08.43 | *** join/#asterisk-doc eliel (n=eliels@120-17-235-201.fibertel.com.ar) |