| 00:00.49 | BladeRunner99 | Who knows if Kapejod take a look to this channel sometimes ???? |
| 00:02.12 | markit | BladeRunner99: why not go to his channel and ask? ;) |
| 00:02.53 | BladeRunner99 | markit: do u know Kapejod ' |
| 00:03.01 | markit | BladeRunner99: join #asterisk-drinkers |
| 00:03.19 | algorithmn | so camophone is located in arizona... (always enjoyed the controversial topics) |
| 00:03.19 | markit | BladeRunner99: he is the creator of chan_capi and bristuff |
| 00:03.58 | Total-Net | Ehsan: how to get oh323 and * to converse both ways |
| 00:07.31 | *** join/#asterisk DrPeanut (~dustin@dhcp065-025-065-114.neo.rr.com) |
| 00:07.37 | pcm | algorithM: is someone doing camophone with asterisk ? |
| 00:08.16 | *** part/#asterisk netghost (~rollotomn@delmar-209-137-161-171-dsl.cavtel.net) |
| 00:08.48 | *** join/#asterisk lilneon (lilneon@cuscon4861.tstt.net.tt) |
| 00:10.05 | algorithmn | pcm: camophone is the next attempt at publically advertising the potential use of asterisk itself |
| 00:10.42 | pcm | algorithm: why are you saing 'next' attempt. was star38 the 1st ? |
| 00:10.49 | algorithmn | i would say so |
| 00:10.56 | algorithmn | there are many companies that sell it right now |
| 00:11.03 | algorithmn | some more paranoid then others |
| 00:11.04 | DrPeanut | I cannot get the TDM400P to work under Linux 2.6. I get a ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) when i do a service zaptel restart |
| 00:11.29 | pcm | drpenuts: do ztcfg |
| 00:11.29 | algorithmn | i know of 4 with camophone with the most flagerent advertising motives |
| 00:11.57 | DrPeanut | ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) |
| 00:11.57 | pcm | algorithm: well it's not that hard after all to start similar service |
| 00:12.04 | algorithmn | not at all |
| 00:12.25 | algorithmn | securing your interests is the hard part |
| 00:12.39 | pcm | drpenut: did you load the proper module ? lsmod ... |
| 00:12.52 | jsharp | And did you hook up the secondary power connector? |
| 00:12.59 | jsharp | And are you using a PCI 2.2 compliant motherboard? |
| 00:13.10 | pcm | jsharp: hehe ... and ... and .. and :) |
| 00:13.11 | DrPeanut | Thats what I was worried about. the PCI 2.2 |
| 00:13.11 | twisted[work] | lol |
| 00:13.17 | twisted[work] | i just asked the same question in -dev |
| 00:13.17 | DrPeanut | zaptel 216836 0 works |
| 00:13.30 | DrPeanut | and i've seen linux pop up and see the card and say there is something in slot 0 |
| 00:13.32 | pcm | zaptel always works :) |
| 00:13.47 | pcm | that's the PCI chipset ... detected by the BIOS |
| 00:14.00 | DrPeanut | twist: moved it over here, sorry. |
| 00:14.20 | DrPeanut | secondary power - CHECK |
| 00:14.30 | DrPeanut | How do i know if I have a PCI 2.2 compliant board? |
| 00:14.30 | twisted[work] | s'ok |
| 00:14.37 | twisted[work] | DrPeanut, check your mobo's manual |
| 00:14.42 | DrPeanut | Its a 300Mhz |
| 00:14.44 | DrPeanut | its old |
| 00:14.45 | twisted[work] | or might be able to find out in bios |
| 00:14.49 | twisted[work] | then it probally doesn't |
| 00:14.59 | DrPeanut | thats what i suspected |
| 00:15.02 | twisted[work] | i have an old 300mhz system that only has 2.1 |
| 00:15.20 | DrPeanut | Its a Dell XPS D300 |
| 00:15.25 | jsharp | do an "lspci" |
| 00:15.50 | jsharp | and you should see "Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Model 300 128k" |
| 00:15.50 | algorithmn | pcm: i have somthing for you to think about. |
| 00:15.59 | jsharp | If not, then your system can't even see the board in the PCI slot. |
| 00:16.02 | DrPeanut | 00:0d.0 Communication controller: Individual Computers - Jens Schoenfeld Intel 537 |
| 00:16.05 | pcm | algorithm: what's that ? |
| 00:16.33 | DrPeanut | Is that what your looking for? |
| 00:16.49 | algorithmn | if caller id-spoofing is considered "untracable" then why do i disagree? |
| 00:17.16 | pcm | algorithm: you disagree with that 'thesis' ? |
| 00:17.20 | algorithmn | yes |
| 00:17.26 | jsharp | DrPeanut: Nope, thats not it. |
| 00:17.46 | BinaryGrey | Anyone used 3com 3101 or 3102 phones with asterisk? |
| 00:17.49 | pcm | algorithm: well as long as the asterisk that sets the callerid keeps it's cdrs :) |
| 00:18.01 | algorithmn | even easier |
| 00:18.08 | DrPeanut | my board is Intel Corp. 440LX/EX |
| 00:18.15 | algorithmn | and more legal (can i say that?) |
| 00:18.24 | *** join/#asterisk Juggie (agony@CPE00c049d9f271-CM014270110981.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 00:18.39 | pcm | algorithm: well we'll see if that's legal ... right now it's grey |
| 00:18.53 | algorithmn | the secret service won't comment either |
| 00:19.06 | algorithmn | the justice department doesn't know |
| 00:19.12 | *** join/#asterisk quickmoney (~jfu2808@216.254.143.32) |
| 00:19.21 | algorithmn | and the FCC is too busy dealing with howard stern |
| 00:19.23 | jsharp | 440LX, no I don't think that's PCI 2.2 |
| 00:19.58 | DrPeanut | I was afraid of that. Its weird that it comes up and shows me the interfaces |
| 00:19.58 | pcm | algorithm : who knows .. maybe FCC will launch some coops to investigate that ... heh |
| 00:20.10 | algorithmn | well... ;-) |
| 00:21.11 | algorithmn | .. awkward silence .. |
| 00:21.14 | pcm | algorithm: that was invented as a feature and not as a security thinggy ... |
| 00:21.26 | algorithmn | yes.. but people trust features |
| 00:21.30 | pcm | algorithm: that's why most likely it won't be illegal unless they'll change it's function ... |
| 00:21.46 | algorithmn | there is no circumvention of security precautions |
| 00:22.08 | algorithmn | decieving the public or fraud for that matter |
| 00:22.20 | algorithmn | could be the kicker |
| 00:22.56 | pcm | algorithm: well yeah .... maybe .... but it's like installing RH 4.1 in the bank connected to internet |
| 00:23.38 | algorithmn | but malicious exploitation is not overshadowed by gross negligence |
| 00:23.55 | DrPeanut | jsharp: I found some documentation online that Communication controller: Individual Computers - Jens Schoenfeld Intel 537 is what Linux 2.6 reports. Any idea if this is correct? |
| 00:24.22 | pcm | well check the lspci -nv class and subclass |
| 00:24.30 | pcm | and compare it with someone else's |
| 00:24.32 | jsharp | I don't think thats it. |
| 00:24.44 | jsharp | It should be a TigerJet communications controller. |
| 00:25.11 | DrPeanut | They said the X100P was that |
| 00:25.22 | *** join/#asterisk Moc (~mochouina@modemcable212.49-80-70.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 00:25.27 | cp5 | is it possible to "return" from a Goto? |
| 00:25.28 | DrPeanut | but the TDM400P was the Jens |
| 00:25.32 | algorithmn | if my question intrigues you, please try to figure for i will give you one vauge hint |
| 00:25.39 | pcm | cp5: only if you use Macro |
| 00:25.50 | pcm | cp5: goto never returns ... IHMO |
| 00:26.04 | aejlum | My sipura's always seem to loose registration with asterisk. I need to reboot the sipura's before I can make and receive calls. Has anyone experienced this before? |
| 00:26.32 | pcm | aejlum: set expiration in sip.conf to 180 seconds or lower |
| 00:26.37 | cp5 | IHMO? |
| 00:26.48 | pcm | IMHO |
| 00:26.56 | cp5 | that's an opinion? |
| 00:26.56 | Moc | aejlum you shure about making calls ? |
| 00:27.02 | cp5 | i need facts, pcm! |
| 00:27.03 | Moc | it not just receiving ? |
| 00:27.04 | aejlum | pcm: I see. I lowered it to 600 seconds. Originally it was 3600 seconds. |
| 00:27.13 | aejlum | Let me try 180 seconds. |
| 00:27.21 | pcm | cp5: oppinion is most likely a fact unless something has changed |
| 00:27.34 | cp5 | haha |
| 00:27.55 | aejlum | Moc: it can sometimes make calls. It just doesn't receive calls most of the time. Only works after reboot. |
| 00:28.14 | Moc | aejlum yes your behind a nat ? |
| 00:28.30 | aejlum | Moc: yes... |
| 00:28.48 | Moc | you can lower the experi.. like pcm said |
| 00:28.53 | *** join/#asterisk snewpy (~markl@203-206-83-5.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
| 00:29.00 | Moc | or forward your udp port |
| 00:29.19 | Moc | frOM YOUR FIREWALL TO YOUR SIPURA |
| 00:29.22 | Moc | sorry |
| 00:29.52 | Moc | im stuck with 1 hand rihtnow |
| 00:29.55 | aejlum | Moc: ic.... I want to make it as transparent as possible to the user. Don't want them messing around with their firewall. |
| 00:30.44 | *** join/#asterisk drazvan (~drazvan@romsat011.fx.ro) |
| 00:30.56 | Moc | aejlum you will need to change the expiery on the sipura |
| 00:31.17 | *** part/#asterisk algorithmn (~algorithm@ool-182f90c0.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 00:31.31 | drazvan | hello everyone. does anyone here know how one could obtain an 101xxxx code (long distance carrier code)? |
| 00:31.40 | Moc | 101 ? |
| 00:31.51 | drazvan | like 1010321 ... 7 digit code |
| 00:31.59 | drazvan | act as a long distance carrier |
| 00:32.18 | drazvan | http://www.thedigest.com/faq/picodes.html |
| 00:32.18 | aejlum | Moc: if I change it in asterisk, will it force the sipura's to re-register? Even it it's set to 600 in the sipura's? |
| 00:32.28 | Moc | aejlum, I dont know |
| 00:32.35 | Moc | I always change it on the phone on my side |
| 00:32.50 | aejlum | alright.... I'll do the same. |
| 00:32.55 | drazvan | I think those codes are sometimes called "dial around numbers" |
| 00:33.20 | lilneon | a/part |
| 00:33.23 | Uther_P | i'm outta here, l8rzz guyz |
| 00:33.25 | *** part/#asterisk lilneon (lilneon@cuscon4861.tstt.net.tt) |
| 00:35.26 | drazvan | ok, it looks like I found the answer to my own question: http://www.thedigest.com/faq/sellfaq.html |
| 00:35.34 | drazvan | short version: it costs over 1 million $ |
| 00:36.31 | Total-Net | how do I get oh323 and * to converse both ways? |
| 00:37.03 | *** part/#asterisk drazvan (~drazvan@romsat011.fx.ro) |
| 00:39.46 | *** part/#asterisk BladeRunner99 (~morrison@adsl-ull-155-67.44-151.net24.it) |
| 00:40.12 | BinaryGrey | Anyone used 3com 3101 or 3102 phones with asterisk? |
| 00:41.51 | Moc | aint those NBX phone ? |
| 00:42.29 | Moc | ok it has SIP support |
| 00:42.45 | Moc | BinaryGrey, you got that phone ? or are looking for a phone ? |
| 00:43.11 | puzzled | BinaryGrey: you need a sip image but 3Com does not give you a sip image at delivery. appareantly you need to load the sip image on the phone using their pbx |
| 00:43.22 | *** join/#asterisk Kumbang (~kumbang@167.205.22.54) |
| 00:43.36 | puzzled | which defeats the purpose of trying to use the phones with asterisk |
| 00:43.55 | BinaryGrey | yeah im looking...grr, even the newer ones ? |
| 00:44.23 | puzzled | dunno, that's what I read on the list iirc |
| 00:45.07 | Oswap | hey |
| 00:45.09 | BinaryGrey | The website says "Delivers the versatility of 3Com NBX H3 or SIP call control support" but SUPPORT doesnt mean "enabled" |
| 00:45.18 | Moc | BinaryGrey, check the polycom phone |
| 00:45.24 | Moc | they are great and at very good price |
| 00:45.34 | puzzled | it will be enabled by loading sip on the phone through the 3Com pbx |
| 00:45.43 | BinaryGrey | SIP default on the polycomm ? |
| 00:45.47 | puzzled | yes |
| 00:45.52 | puzzled | good phones |
| 00:46.02 | Moc | BinaryGrey, yes Polycom are the best IP phone out there |
| 00:47.03 | BinaryGrey | awesome |
| 00:47.27 | Moc | they got the IP 300 at 120$, IP 500 at 170$ and ip 600 at 290$ |
| 00:48.44 | Moc | the handfree on the IP 500 and ip 600 is better than the cisco 7960 |
| 00:48.56 | BinaryGrey | love the price points wow |
| 00:49.08 | Moc | and the display is larger and easier to read than cisco too |
| 00:49.23 | Moc | yes polycom phone are at resonable price for that type of phone |
| 00:50.13 | *** join/#asterisk pcm (~pcm@user-69-73-0-22.knology.net) |
| 00:50.34 | *** part/#asterisk eKo1 (~abc@63.245.57.70) |
| 00:50.41 | pcm | ups, had a fight with cable modem .... |