IRC log for #asterisk on 20110614

00:02.40*** part/#asterisk Tech_Travis (~Travis_El@cpe-76-168-191-127.socal.res.rr.com)
00:05.13leifmadsenmichael-i: use GoSub()
00:06.56michael-ileifmadsen: I thought that but was reading that GoSub() will not work as expected from the applicationmap
00:07.15michael-ileifmadsen: but I shall try as a good instructeeeeeee shall
00:21.19michael-ileifmadsen: awesome....asterisk segfaults when I load up app_stack
00:21.23michael-itime to go home :)
00:24.42*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@corp.fuzecore.com)
00:25.07*** join/#asterisk Cain` (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
00:31.45*** join/#asterisk kaldemar (~kaldemar@unaffiliated/kaldemar)
00:50.40*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~irc@2001:470:1f07:1225:7c23:92b3:7e50:df74)
00:53.43*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@210.17.219.183)
01:11.39*** join/#asterisk WiretapSeven (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
01:24.37*** join/#asterisk blake (~blake@2607:f8b8:2:2:129a:ddff:feb1:9b59)
01:27.25*** join/#asterisk WiretapWork (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
01:29.36*** join/#asterisk MatBoy (~MatBoy@wiljewelwetenhe.xs4all.nl)
01:38.21*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
01:57.48*** join/#asterisk Canabinoide (~fred@187.120.134.214)
02:11.44*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
02:24.43linuxgeckoarrghh.
02:25.13linuxgeckothis should be a lot more simple than this//   one shoudl be able to at least MODERATELY expect libs to complie right.
02:25.40WiretapWorklinuxgecko, it sounds almost like you're using Gentoo...
02:28.17luckman212hey can anyone recommend a decent analog gateway that has >8 FXS ports?  i tried a Mediatrix 4116 but found it nearly impossible to configure.  i just need something to use as an interim solution for a customer who has an old analog Avaya phone system.  i basically want to replace their POTS lines with a SIP trunk and have the gateway feed out into the existing FXO ports on the legacy PBX
02:28.27Canabinoideis gone.. autoaway after 15 min ..[cyp(l/on.p/on)]
02:28.43WiretapWorkCanabinoide, turn that off!
02:28.44luckman212they'll use it like that for ~6 months before they have budget to replace all the legacy phones etc
02:28.56p3nguincanabinoide: You've been asked to turn that off.
02:30.32WiretapWorkluckman212, Cisco VG224?
02:30.52WiretapWorkPlanet probably do something too
02:31.32luckman212WiretapWork: is that SIP?
02:33.18WiretapWorkluckman212, either SIP, SCCP or H323, most probably SIP
02:33.27WiretapWorkhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/index.html
02:35.03luckman212hm looks nice but I'm fairly sure it'd take me 6 months to learn how to configure it
02:35.44luckman212if they were planning to hang onto this piece of equipment for longer than that it would make sense
02:40.16luckman212if you had to choose between a Grandstream GXW4024 or an Audiocodes MP-124  (almost 3x the price) which would you pick?
02:44.03Canabinoidehas returned.. back again ..[gone/15m 37s]
02:44.25*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
02:50.31WiretapWorkluckman212, cisco stuff is not that bad
02:50.50WiretapWorkCanabinoide, FUCKING TURN THAT FUCKING OFF
02:51.59*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
02:53.11*** join/#asterisk simplydrew (~simplydre@unaffiliated/simplydrew)
02:54.08*** join/#asterisk qr42 (~qr42@ip68-4-151-50.oc.oc.cox.net)
02:54.59luckman212WiretapWork: oh no I am sure it's an excellent piece of kit,  I am just guessing that I'm not up to the challenge of configuring it by next week
02:55.18WiretapWorkluckman212, no, what I mean is, if you can handle asterisk, you'll like cisco
02:55.22WiretapWorkthere is a lot of similarity
02:55.46WiretapWorkand there is a channel full of cisco nerds at the ready if you get stuck
02:56.30luckman212haha.. ok well I will definitely consider it.  I see them for $8-900 on ebay which is very comparable to those others
03:05.48*** join/#asterisk jpsharp (~jsharp@2001:470:5:47e::19)
03:16.51*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@pool-173-51-129-161.lsanca.fios.verizon.net)
03:24.53linuxgeckoWiretapWork: I'm compiling from source as if i were.   the iksemel i can find in suse's repo doesn't seem to have gnutls in it. so i'm trying to compile a iksemel from source that does..  and i can't get it to like the gnutls i have in repo, and i can't get it to like the gnutls i compiled myself.
03:25.54WiretapWorkfun
03:26.48linuxgeckoWiretapWork:  yeah.
03:27.26Canabinoideis gone.. autoaway after 15 min ..[cyp(l/on.p/on)]
03:27.50linuxgeckoall i need to know is how to feed iksemel's ./configure the right info so it will actually compile in gnutls use.
03:28.43WiretapWorkp3nguin, do you have the power?
03:33.29*** join/#asterisk WiretapSeven (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
03:38.27linuxgeckoI'm switching us to asterisk-relayed googlevoice, but the wife wants a cordless phone. might you be able to recommend a cordless hardphone?
03:39.13mzbIP Phone or ATA+cordless?
03:39.32mzbif the latter I have a great deal of success with Panasonic cordless phones
03:40.01mzb18hr talk time, excellent handsfree quality, and great range
03:40.05luckman212i like the VTech cordless dect phones myself
03:41.14mzbPanasonic == DECT, btw
03:41.16sunfonePanasonic is the only one I have seen with a mini headset jack
03:41.36sunfoneI use them all day long plugged into an SPA2102
03:41.44sunfonebattery life is exagerrated
03:41.49sunfoneI get about 4 hours talk time
03:42.01WiretapWorkmzb, pana have released some DECT IP Phones
03:42.13mzbhmm
03:42.42sunfonethat seems like such a waste... why?  What do you get that you don't get with a cheap ATA?
03:42.48mzbI'm using KX-TGA250AZ which I bought for $25 ea ... great result for the price
03:42.54sunfoneexactly
03:42.54WiretapWorkclean handling of multiple lines
03:43.07sunfonehrm I guess so
03:43.11mzband I got a large box of sp2000's a few years ago for $20 (delivered)
03:43.29WiretapWorkI mean, I'm pretty happy with my V-Tech 5.8GHz WDECT phone that cost me $25
03:43.44WiretapWorkit handles being attached to an ATA almost as if it were a native IP phone
03:44.02sunfoneI even do my recordings with it via the ATA
03:44.06WiretapWorkline switching/cwait behaves perfectly, etc
03:44.15sunfoneis it dual line?
03:44.20WiretapWorknope
03:44.25WiretapWorkthat's the thing
03:44.30sunfonethere are some
03:44.37WiretapWorkit supports the same multiple-line feature my ATA does in software
03:44.51sunfoneas far as CW you mean?
03:44.51WiretapWorkso you hit the 'on' key in mid call, and it holds one call and opens anotherl ine
03:44.55WiretapWorkye
03:44.57WiretapWorkyes*
03:44.57sunfoneright... flash
03:45.02WiretapWorkyes
03:45.07WiretapWorkexcept it still knows about the call on hold
03:45.10sunfonebut it would be useful to have an actual second line too
03:45.15WiretapWorkdoesn't pretend it doesn't exist like most do
03:45.24sunfoneYa the Panasonic does that too
03:45.38sunfoneI have to be careful not to inject hold music in conference calls :)
03:45.43WiretapWorklol!
03:46.57sunfonenight all... I've had enough for one day
03:48.41*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@pool-173-51-129-161.lsanca.fios.verizon.net)
03:55.09*** join/#asterisk celord (~celord@200.91.75.115)
03:58.55*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@pool-173-51-129-161.lsanca.fios.verizon.net)
04:02.17linuxgeckoeither,  but i can't seem to unlock the ata someone gave me.
04:02.53linuxgeckoit's a linksys rtp300 that seems locked to someone ( i think it's vonage)
04:03.20linuxgeckoso rather than hasle with that ( unless it's REALLY simple,) i was thinking cordless IP phone
04:03.43*** join/#asterisk luckman212_ (~irc@2001:470:1f07:1225:7c23:92b3:7e50:df74)
04:04.26linuxgeckowhat is DECT good for?
04:04.41WiretapWorka lot more than war
04:09.05virothis is probaly an annoying question but whats the best sub $120 voip phone
04:10.43WiretapWorkthat's not as much annoying as unanswerable
04:16.24*** join/#asterisk g00gle (~thameema@c-98-248-232-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
04:17.11*** join/#asterisk radic (~radic@dslb-178-002-239-103.pools.arcor-ip.net)
04:23.09*** join/#asterisk WiretapWork_ (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
04:23.35*** join/#asterisk brookshire (mbrooks@hijacked.us)
04:29.41*** join/#asterisk Wiretap_Work (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
04:30.01SkoZombieviro: I like the snom gear, but I dont know if they have anything that cheap
04:30.32SkoZombieeverytime I thought I've bricked a snom phone with a firmware update, they've had details online on how to de-brick
04:34.28*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
04:35.09*** join/#asterisk blake (~blake@2607:f8b8:2:3:129a:ddff:feb1:9b59)
04:44.15*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-34-131.smartone-vodafone.com)
04:51.50*** join/#asterisk fulcan (~root@li345-191.members.linode.com)
05:09.11fulcanworking on a 72 hr teliax error. maybe someone might have an answer    http://pastebin.com/HEzCeGwr
05:11.43*** join/#asterisk ferdna (~yup@cpe-67-10-220-35.elp.res.rr.com)
05:13.14linuxgeckofulcan: 72 hour???
05:13.33fulcanyup
05:14.28fulcanlinuxgecko I have come far, but I am about fed the f&ck up.
05:15.41*** join/#asterisk freeman_u (~freeman@193.110.114.54)
05:16.50linuxgeckofulcan:  sorry that i can't help.  never used teliax, and i'm working on using google voice.
05:17.12*** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@196-209-7-14.dynamic.isadsl.co.za)
05:17.18*** join/#asterisk celord (~celord@201.198.102.2)
05:20.12ChannelZfulcan: Your context 'decisions' has no extention that would match 7185696200
05:21.21fulcanChannelZ yes it does. ?
05:21.30ChannelZno it doesn't
05:22.22ChannelZLines 24 through 32.
05:23.14fulcanwhat does this do? exten => lineIn1,s,GotoIF($["${CALLERID(num)}" = "7185696288"]?myPhone1))   ??  and that goes to  ->[myPhone1]   or I am totally jacked up on my understanding of how extensions refer to a context....
05:23.51*** join/#asterisk g_r_eek (~g_r_eek@173-9-142-122-Miami.FL.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
05:24.00ChannelZthat's extension 'lineIn'
05:24.24ChannelZand your priorities are all messed up too
05:24.25*** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~moi@178.128.143.44.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
05:25.51fulcanwuzamarine comes in GLUED to the inbound and in a desperate attemt to try ANYTHING to get rid of it, I renamed it,,, but that 'should' send it to "7185696288"]?myPhone1))???
05:27.02ChannelZreread the error - Call from 'wuzamarine' TO EXTENSION '7185696200' rejected (emphasis mine)
05:27.46fulcanwuzamarine = sticky glued bs. -> ext 718***   what am I missing here?
05:28.01ChannelZI don't even know what you're saying now
05:28.18fulcanthe extension is defined in [7185696200]
05:28.33ChannelZThat's a different context.
05:29.02fulcan[7185696200] is the extension context??
05:29.36*** join/#asterisk el3slave (~email@ip68-4-133-145.oc.oc.cox.net)
05:29.40ChannelZ[7185696200] is a context called "7185696200" with extensions in it
05:29.58ChannelZYour failed call is coming into a context called "decisions"
05:30.24ChannelZThe extension it's trying to find in that context is 7185696200.  That extension doesn't exist
05:30.50fulcanthen what does [7185696200.] do?
05:30.57ChannelZHell if I know
05:31.44fulcanone sec, before I stick my foot any deeper.
05:32.18ChannelZContexts are like boxes.  If you're inside one box, you can't do anything to (or even see) the contents of another box sitting beside you.
05:33.11fulcan"7185696288"]?myPhone1))   = "match string"]?goHere))???
05:33.58ChannelZthat's irrelevant at this point because you're not even getting there
05:34.31fulcan??????  It's looking in decisions,,, is it not?
05:34.50kaldemar[7185696200.] does not do anything. it is just a name for a context.
05:34.50ChannelZ*sigh* yes but that part of the dialplan isn't even being run
05:35.19ChannelZ7185696200 is your DID you're trying to call in on, yes?
05:35.21kaldemaronly extensions instruct asterisk to actually do something.
05:36.23fulcandecisions has ""7185696288"]?7185696288))"  I shouldn't even be talking about myPhone1 because I through in the safety context. why does it now go there?
05:36.41kaldemarwhat is "decisions"?
05:36.57fulcankaldemar a context to make decisions.
05:37.49ChannelZyou're biting off more than you can chew without understanding the basics.  Hang on a second.
05:38.58ChannelZhttp://pastebin.com/yidmUUVh
05:39.22kaldemarfulcan: so you have a device in sip.conf as [wuzamarine]. it has context=decisions under it. when an incoming call matches [wuzamarine], asterisk looks for the dialled number in [decisions] in extensions.conf.
05:39.48fulcanChannelZ whats that?
05:40.04ChannelZA replacement for your extensions.conf for the [decisions] context.  Try it.  You'll like it.
05:40.06fulcankaldemar no device called wuzamarine.
05:40.10ChannelZThen look at it and you'll see why it works.
05:40.18kaldemarin your case, the number was 7185696200. so you need an extension (exten => ...) in [decisions] that matches the number. for example exten => 7185696200,1,dosomething.
05:41.12kaldemarexten => wuzamarine would match if the number was "wuzamarine", not 7185696200. exten => lineIn1 would match if the number was "lineIn1" instead of 7185696200.
05:41.42kaldemarfulcan: show your sip.conf
05:41.50fulcanChannelZ decisions analyzes wheather the inbound number is from one did or another. depending on its 'decision' the call is forwarded to the conjunctive context.
05:41.53ChannelZit's on the end of his paste
05:42.10ChannelZfulcan: I don't care, it's totally broken and doesn't work.  I'm trying to help you understand WHY
05:42.12kaldemarhm. too early for me...
05:42.49*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-fvovsxryopgymujv)
05:43.05ChannelZthe only "decision" at this point can be made WITHOUT a single GotoIf because your provider calls the extension of your DID
05:43.26fulcanChannelZ I can do one line just fine. It's when I program two that kills me so hosing [decisions] to prove a single line point is just a waste of time.
05:43.34ChannelZAnd as I have pointed out and kaldemar just did, your current logic is all hooked up to an extension called "lineIn1" which is impossible to call
05:43.37kaldemarwell, whatever the device is named, there must be a matching extension in [decisions]. do as ChannelZ told in his pastebin and see instant results.
05:44.07ChannelZIf you have another DID called 1112223344, you make that an extension and do what you want with it.
05:44.09fulcankaldemar sip.conf is in my original post my friend.
05:44.22kaldemarfulcan: found it already.
05:45.17fulcan<ChannelZ> the only "decision" at this point can be made WITHOUT a single
05:45.33fulcan+GotoIf because your provider calls the extension of your DID    is not making sense my friend.
05:45.39ChannelZWhile you might be able to get one line running, you don't seem to actually understand how or why which is what I'm trying to help you with
05:45.55ChannelZLOOK at the bit I pastebinned.
05:46.32fulcanwhat does [7185696200] do?  is this not an extension definition?
05:46.35ChannelZYour provider is sending a call TO *extension* 7185696200
05:46.43ChannelZof for christ sake man, are you even reading what we're saying?
05:46.54fulcanwhat does [7185696200] do?  is this not an extension definition?
05:47.16kaldemarfulcan: and GotoIf does not work how you expect it to. "GotoIf(condition?[labeliftrue][:labeliffalse])" <-- label is a priority (1), extension and a priority (12345,1) or context and extension and priority (myPhone1,12345,1).
05:47.17ChannelZI'm not trying to be an A-hole here but we've explained it 3 times and you're not even paying attention
05:47.44WiretapSevenfulcan, don't be a cunt
05:48.03*** join/#asterisk sgimeno (~sgimeno@163.117.206.10)
05:48.10ChannelZand for the last time NO [7185696200] IS NOT an extension definition!
05:48.16p3nguinThe string in [] is a CONTEXT.
05:48.24WiretapSevenit is a PEER definition if its in sip.conf
05:48.24kaldemarfulcan: [7185696200] is a name for a context. extensions are define as exten => <extension>,<priority>,...
05:48.35p3nguinThe string after exten => is an extension.
05:49.23fulcanGotoIf(["${CALLERID(num  ((grab the caller id is the condition))?[string = 7185696200)"  this seems pretty elementary to me.
05:49.47*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
05:49.51ChannelZit's wrong
05:49.56ChannelZwe're telling you it's wrong
05:50.02kaldemarfulcan: you have serious problems with the syntax.
05:50.19fulcanthen --> goto this ->  7185696200 extension definition
05:50.25ChannelZAnd it has nothing to do with your actual problem at this point which is that Asterisk will never even execute that line.
05:50.27*** join/#asterisk showme (~showme@24.94.180.175)
05:50.43WiretapSevenfulcan, that is about as useful as tits on a bull
05:51.44kaldemarfulcan: GotoIf($[true]?blah) does not go to extension blah, it goes to a priority in the current extension.
05:51.53fulcanat this point, what the fucking answer because my fingure is on the fucking delete button.
05:52.06ChannelZI showed you
05:52.20ChannelZhttp://pastebin.com/yidmUUVh - it's the most basic thing in the world
05:52.21kaldemarfulcan: you already got your answer. try what ChannelZ pasted and you'll see how it works.
05:52.24fulcanpost answer fuck theory
05:53.06kaldemarnow go copy and paste and try it.
05:53.11ChannelZAnd that's the last time I'm helping because you're being an ass.
05:53.36WiretapSevenfulcan, you are a fucking tool, you know that?
05:54.02fulcansorry, really agravated. not at you either, me...
05:54.19WiretapSevenbeing an ass in here will not get your problem solved
05:54.22ChannelZI get it but you're aggravated to the point you're not even bothering to listen to what we're saying
05:54.30WiretapSevenlistening and a little creative googling will get your problem solved
05:56.14*** join/#asterisk Thedr (~Thedr@59.191.225.49)
05:56.30ThedrHi guys
05:56.31fulcanemerge --unmerge is the only answer.
05:57.02ThedrDoes anyone know if a different code was ever used to access voicemail apart from *97 or *98?
05:57.19WiretapSevenwow... he honestly can't get it working, I'm impressed
05:57.21ChannelZIt can be anything you want, really...
05:57.27WiretapSevenThedr, you can set it to anything under the sun
05:58.02Thedrok, would that be configured in the sip.conf?
05:58.07ChannelZI don't know what fulcan's problem was.. he must have though I was trying to format his HD or something
05:58.14WiretapSevenThedr, no, because it is not relevant to SIP
05:58.24WiretapSevenChannelZ, he's a gentoo user :P
05:58.35WiretapSevenhe doesn't even know 'emerge -C' ffs :P
05:59.15ChannelZThedr: Are you using FreePBX maybe?
05:59.26WiretapSevenprobably
05:59.34WiretapSevenin which case you configure it on the feature codes menu
06:00.02Thedrno, this is an older system, I think before even freepbx
06:00.08WiretapSeventrixbox?
06:00.13WiretapSeven:P
06:00.25WiretapSevenyou'll have to dig through extensions.conf to find the feature code
06:00.35ChannelZwell if you're doing it manually, extensions.conf - you can make any extension you want run VoiceMailMain
06:00.59Thedrah thanks
06:01.22ThedrThanks a bunch for that, at least I have a starting point now
06:02.18ChannelZSure - we're happy to have a good listener :)
06:03.15WiretapSevenXD!
06:14.04*** join/#asterisk schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at)
06:14.08schmidtsgood morning
06:15.57*** join/#asterisk cerberus_za (~coert@41-134-110-162.dsl.mweb.co.za)
06:17.45*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.223.57.78)
06:18.31*** join/#asterisk fulcan (~root@li345-191.members.linode.com)
06:18.32fulcan"<kaldemar> fulcan: GotoIf($[true]?blah) does not go to extension blah, it goes to a priority in the current extension."   <--  I am looking into this 'a lot'.  ChannelZ, kaldemar, WiretapSeven, I am an ass. thank you for putting up with me. I am off this one till tomorrow. I hope I didn't piss anyone off. Good night my friends.
06:18.48fulcansame error with your change though....  :(
06:19.06*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@dsl-242-10-219.telkomadsl.co.za)
06:19.31jkroonwhat could possible causes of fxotune -i not reducing echo by a reasonable margin be?
06:20.08jkrooni've got a set of four lines on a Digium AEX800 card, 2 x quad FXO where I see up to 0.3 echo ratio even after running fxotune -i and loading with fxotune -s
06:22.13*** join/#asterisk bdfoster (~bdfoster@unaffiliated/bdfoster)
06:22.15ThedrThanks guys found it and let the client know, they soon discovered they had 100 unread voicemail.
06:22.31*** join/#asterisk Insonic (~kvirc@ip-178-203-122-117.unitymediagroup.de)
06:35.04*** join/#asterisk WiretapSeven (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
06:38.10*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.223.57.75)
06:39.09*** join/#asterisk cneb3000-laptop (~cneb30000@02da1dc1.bb.sky.com)
06:41.27cneb3000-laptopa little un-related to asterisk but interesting all the same. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/technology/14security.html?_r=1&hp
06:41.52cneb3000-laptopintruders changed the account number variable in the address bar once they logged into a bank. and got access to other account
06:41.54cneb3000-laptop>_<
06:42.07Thedrwow
06:44.25*** part/#asterisk xSmurf (~MrSmurf@unaffiliated/mrsmurf)
06:46.37*** join/#asterisk zkn (~zkn@195.222.14.202)
06:50.04*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-171-103-215.ip.telfort.nl)
06:55.11*** part/#asterisk g00gle (~thameema@c-98-248-232-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
06:59.09*** part/#asterisk markfoodyburton (~Adium@LMontsouris-156-24-44-5.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr)
07:00.27zknhello
07:02.46zknquestion about "cdr_adaptive_odbc.conf"
07:03.58zkndo I understand correctly that I need to manually create the table for adaptive odbc, too ?
07:04.40*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~irc@2001:470:1f07:1225:7c23:92b3:7e50:df74)
07:12.39*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
07:14.45*** join/#asterisk WiretapMac (~wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
07:15.43*** join/#asterisk ickmund (~ickmund@cli-5b7e85fc.bcn.adamo.es)
07:22.58*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:34c6:13ab:604f:ed9d)
07:25.00*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-62-23.smartone-vodafone.com)
07:25.04*** join/#asterisk screenn (~screenn@178.151.86.196)
07:27.24*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~david@41.225.9.81)
07:27.55*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~irc@pool-74-108-1-53.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
07:30.33*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226)
07:35.36*** join/#asterisk WiretapMac (~wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
07:48.25*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-62-23.smartone-vodafone.com)
07:48.29wdoekes2zkn: you have to create all tables manually, afaik
07:48.51wdoekes2and the adaptive one should be tailored to your needs, so the more reason to do it yourself
07:58.13*** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/atheme.member.chainsaw)
08:04.21*** join/#asterisk darksk1ez (~mhb@darkskiez.ipv6.darkskiez.co.uk)
08:09.46zknwdoekes2, i would need the normal native cdr columns and data only
08:10.56wdoekes2then I'm unsure why you want the adaptive version
08:10.59zknas I understand from the book, the adaptive odbc should create everything automagically, apart from the table (it seems, as I have not yet got it to enter any data to my MySQL db)
08:11.52zknadaptive version was recommended for new version of Asterisk, so i thought i'd give it a try
08:11.58wdoekes2mm.. the only experience I have with cdr_adaptive is that I didn't get it to work in a short amount of time.. but that was quite a while ago ;)
08:13.08kaldemarzkn: http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/asterisk-Monitoring.html#default_cdr_fields
08:13.22*** join/#asterisk sxpert (~sxpert@navsys.org)
08:14.08zknkaldemar, ok, so i need to create the whole table manually before the DB will accept any data from (adaptive) odbc
08:15.07kaldemarzkn: asterisk won't create it for you either.
08:15.25*** join/#asterisk engrxyz (~puitpyitr@212.23.51.7)
08:15.57zknheh, ok, i guess i hoped too much from it, then.. no problem, will create the table for it
08:17.04zknbut briefly, what benefits does the adaptive connector have compared to the "normal" one? why would one prefer one to the other?
08:17.10kaldemarhttp://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/asterisk-DB.html#database_storing-cdr <--
08:17.58kaldemaryou can choose the data that goes into the database and add additional data created by yourself with the CDR function
08:18.34zknaha, great, that would suit me well
08:19.41zknthanks for clarifications
08:30.15zkncan MySQL and PostgreSQL be compared in the sense that one is better for Asterisk that the other one?
08:30.25zknthan*
08:31.20sxpertthey probably are equally suited.
08:31.34sxperthowever postgresql is way more powerfull
08:32.02zknin what way?
08:32.13*** join/#asterisk Poincare (~jefffnode@2001:470:d6b3:4::2)
08:32.41sxpertit allows you to do more complicated things, including stored procedures in multiple languages
08:32.56sxpertcompare postgresql and oracle
08:33.09sxpertwhereas mysql is more limited in functionnality
08:35.49*** join/#asterisk mandla (~mandla@168.167.180.161)
08:36.29zknokay
08:36.38zknthanks
08:39.09*** join/#asterisk irroot (~irroot@dsl-185-122-97.dynamic.wa.co.za)
08:43.40*** join/#asterisk mickecarlsson (~Micke@h95n1c1o1101.bredband.skanova.com)
08:56.56*** join/#asterisk EncRyptO (encrypto@unaffiliated/encrypto)
08:56.56*** join/#asterisk Faustov (~fst@gentoo/user/faustov)
09:03.44irrootbanging head on wall
09:07.00zknok, i got my first entry to my MySQL db with adaptive odbc, however calldate was recorded as 0000-00-00 00:00:00 - how can i fix that to record correct system time ?
09:09.33zkngot it :)
09:10.21*** join/#asterisk sourcode (~code@ppp-58-8-90-32.revip2.asianet.co.th)
09:12.06*** join/#asterisk freeman_u (~freeman@193.110.114.54)
09:15.13*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@197.107.252.135)
09:28.36*** join/#asterisk caveat- (hoax@newshell1.bshellz.net)
09:38.24*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~david@41.225.9.81)
09:45.44*** join/#asterisk aberrios (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
09:49.10*** join/#asterisk screenn (~screenn@178.151.86.196)
09:50.33*** join/#asterisk MarKsaitis (~MarKsaiti@host81-137-62-5.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
10:10.01*** join/#asterisk TimeRider (~steve@188-220-33-123.zone11.bethere.co.uk)
10:10.58*** join/#asterisk remx (~remx@corporate.runecho.com)
10:11.40*** join/#asterisk screenn (~screenn@178.151.86.196)
10:15.08*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-61-8.smartone-vodafone.com)
10:19.35*** join/#asterisk ruyo (~psantos@a83-132-152-91.cpe.netcabo.pt)
10:19.46MariusAgonSorry for my newby'ness, but, when should I use PlayBack() and when BackGround() applications?
10:20.46WiretapSevenwhen you need them?
10:21.12WIMPyUse background if you want DTMF input to let you go to other extensions in the dialplan while playing.
10:21.28irroot^^^^
10:21.46MariusAgonthank you
10:22.24*** join/#asterisk orn (~orn@rtr1.sh23.sip.is)
10:23.34*** join/#asterisk cyborg-one (1000@79.140.9.126)
10:24.42*** join/#asterisk sropas (sropas@101.108.11.101)
10:24.45MariusAgonI'm just 22 and started working is just my start so don't laugh at me please too much
10:25.16sropasI will need some help on Asterisk Business Edition.
10:25.42irrootdefine too much >:-)
10:26.32MariusAgonNo isterical laugh
10:26.34MariusAgon:)
10:26.55sropasmy license said, I registered to a different host and has already changed HOST-ID the maximum allowd time, you must contact Digium to be able to activate this key again.
10:29.21*** join/#asterisk fhmiv (~fhmiv@adsl-065-005-242-247.sip.ags.bellsouth.net)
10:31.12*** join/#asterisk kaii (~kh@ciphron.de)
10:39.52*** join/#asterisk mechbangirc (~mechbangi@115-186-140-164.nayatel.pk)
10:40.49mechbangirccan I do something like host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for an IP based auth trunk in sip.conf
10:43.01mechbangirccarrier does not provide user/pass registeration, traffic comes from 3 different IPs so instead of three different trunk definition I want to use single trunk with 3 different IPs? is it possible??
10:44.09mechbangircdo I have to port forward something in router to get your replies OR are you guys sleeping...
10:45.51WiretapSeven~ask
10:45.51infobotQuestions in the channel should be specific, informative, complete, concise, and on-topic.  Don't ask if you can ask a question first.  Don't ask if a person is there; just ask what you intended to ask them.  Better questions more frequently yield better answers.  We are all here voluntarily or against our will.
10:45.52irrootis not sure does not think so .. try if it breaks you can tell us ... and keep the pieces :P
10:46.15WiretapSevenyou can define host as a hostname
10:46.26WiretapSeventhey will probably have a hostname that matches all three addresses
10:46.41*** join/#asterisk cyborg-one (1000@79.140.9.126)
10:47.53WIMPyThat's supposed to work?
10:48.24mechbangircthanks guys, my screen was not showing anything I thought that way. WiretapSeven: what if they dont publish that host name is there any way I can reverse find it?
10:48.54WiretapSevenerm yeah
10:49.01WiretapSevenyou can do a dns look up on the ip address
10:49.26mechbangirchow do i do that nslookup ??
10:49.34WIMPySure, but that will just pick one random address, won't it?
10:49.35WiretapSevenwtf is nslookup?
10:49.53WiretapSevenWIMPy, if its inbound it doesn't really matter so long as all the addresses have valid PTR records
10:50.00WiretapSevenfor the same origin
10:50.44WIMPyAh, well, that's the thing then. They have distinct PTR records.
10:52.08irrootfake it in hosts ??
10:52.51WIMPyNot easier that jsut creating multiple peers with templates. Just more confusing.
10:55.18*** join/#asterisk mechbangirc (~mechbangi@mbl-65-157-81.dsl.net.pk)
10:56.05WIMPyComparing PTR records seems like a security issue, though.
10:56.13mechbangircWiretapSeven: any web tool to find DNS information
10:57.27mechbangircWIMPy: I dig the ip and it does not give me any hostname
10:57.35WiretapSevenWIMPy, well, yes, true
10:58.16*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@m121-202-61-8.smartone-vodafone.com)
11:02.12mechbangircI am using this site http://www.iptools.com and could not find host name against one of the IP of that carrier
11:04.04mechbangircI read somewhere i can do host=IP&IP&IP if I do this how can I verify that it works for all the IPs I specified as I dont have any balance in my account?
11:33.15*** join/#asterisk din3sh (~angelica@41.136.101.69)
11:34.35din3shhello ppl
11:35.46din3shcan anyone advise, i have compiled 1.4.41 but now Cisco phones previously working fine with 1.4.22 wont register
11:38.14atheosdin3sh - I don't know if 1.4 was affected, but 1.6 & 1.8 are experiencing this issue: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18951
11:38.38atheosI'm  on 1.6.2.17.1 for the same issue
11:39.22din3shis 1.8.4.2 still having the issue?
11:40.26din3shi compiled 1.4.41 jst before peak time in an office with 150 extensions
11:40.27din3shloll
11:40.34din3sh150 cisco 7911
11:40.39atheosdin3sh - possible http://snapvoip.blogspot.com/2011/05/cisco-phones-and-asterisk-184.html
11:41.12atheosdin3sh - I was in a similar boat 2 weeks ago, just do a make install from your previous build, and your phones will fire back up.
11:41.38din3shi didnt have time to roll back
11:41.53din3shthankfully i had another stable server as backup
11:42.05din3shjust switched over to the other server
11:42.17atheosoh, well, that's just bad preparation :) always assume problems will occur on an upgrade !
11:42.36din3sham running 1.4.22 without any problems
11:42.48din3shi jst wanted to have the remote called ID working
11:43.13din3shany chances u have got that running?
11:45.04atheosnot applicable on the system I maintain
11:45.14din3sh:(
11:45.26din3shcall centre?
11:45.56leifmadsendin3sh: that problem is resolved in 1.8.4.2
11:46.14din3shhello leif
11:46.21leifmadsen1.8.4.2 contains fixes for the cisco registration
11:46.31din3shahh good
11:46.35din3shi jst downloaded it
11:46.41din3shcompiling it
11:47.31din3shis the registration problem on 1.4.41 also resolved in 1.4.42?
11:47.44leifmadsenI don't know -- check the ChangeLog
11:47.47leifmadsenthat's what they are there for
11:47.54din3shlol
11:47.58din3shok
11:48.03atheosno such love for 1.6.2.18 unfortunately
11:48.06leifmadsenI'm not sure I get the joke
11:48.17leifmadsenlook at the svn log then for the 1.6.2 branch and see if it was fixed there
11:48.28din3shok will do
11:48.30leifmadsenlook at the bug that fixed the issue, and see what revision and which branches it was committed in
11:48.36leifmadsenthere is LOTS of data on where and what is fixed
11:55.06*** join/#asterisk billmania (~bill@38.98.130.98)
12:04.37*** join/#asterisk fish-bulb (~qcstewart@nat/digium/x-kpsmxwiaboyhhqvz)
12:07.57mandlahttp://pastebin.com/gaxDJGnt
12:08.01mandlaPlease help...
12:08.28WIMPymandla: Got your card working?
12:09.10mandlaWIMPy, the card is working fine, now the problem is that i cant get calls to go outside the office.
12:09.14*** part/#asterisk SkoZombie (~quassel@60-240-15-173.tpgi.com.au)
12:09.57WIMPymandla: I don't know what you're trying to do in your dilpaln, but it dials nothing.
12:10.29mandlaWIMPy, let me pastebin my dialplan.
12:11.23din3shcisco registers on 1.8.4.2
12:11.24din3shtested
12:11.26din3sh:)
12:11.43mandlaWIMPy, http://pastebin.com/2nwCnLRV
12:12.27irrootmandla dumenlanf
12:12.29mandlaWIMPy, Im in Botswana, and our PSTN lines are like 3659999, and we append +267 as a country code.
12:12.31irrootmandla dumenlang
12:13.22mandlairroot, dumela irroot, o tsogile?
12:14.50irrootyou got me not fluent all well lets see if we can help
12:14.50WIMPymandla: The important part is missing. But maybe you should simplify your dialplan?
12:15.23*** join/#asterisk pc-m (~pascal@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca)
12:15.26WIMPyThat looks as if you try to look like freepbx :-)
12:18.20irrootmandla keep it simple indeed
12:18.23irrootexten => _0X.,1,Dial(g2/${EXTEN})
12:18.40irrootanything starting with a 0 is passed out
12:18.40*** join/#asterisk fhmiv (~fhmiv@c-67-173-205-151.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
12:18.44irrootmandla keep it simple indeed
12:18.46irrootexten => _0X.,1,Dial(DAHDI/g2/${EXTEN})
12:19.07irrootand build up from there
12:20.54mandlairroot, should i wipe out everything i got in extension.conf and replace it with exten => _0X.,1,Dial(DAHDI/g2/${EXTEN})?
12:21.45WIMPyAnd are you sure it should be g2?
12:22.14mandlaWIMPy, i just found it that way.
12:22.19irrootfor the "[context]" calls are coming from
12:22.41irrootcheck chan_dahdi.conf and see what group your lines are to be sure
12:23.05WIMPymandla: That's not going to help. You need a dialplan for your situation, not somebody elses.
12:23.49din3shtrying to build up from freepbx dialplan with little knowledged of dialplan gonna hurt
12:23.50din3sh:D
12:23.51*** join/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137-237-233-124.harris.com)
12:24.50WIMPydin3sh: That might be true if only either of the conditions is met.
12:25.54din3shit mandla's case i think
12:26.23din3shshould wipe off the freepbx dialplan and build up simple as u sugeested
12:26.38WIMPyIs that from freepbx?
12:27.18din3shseems so
12:27.39din3shelastix?
12:27.49mandlaIts a default dialplan i found in the extension.conf, all i did was to add my dcdmcr calling rule and dcdmc dailplan.
12:27.57mandlaFrom AsteriskNow.
12:28.25din3shoh oki
12:28.40WIMPymandla: Don't do that. If you've got it working and know what you're doing, you can start to add parts from other peopl's dialplans you think might be useful.
12:29.21WIMPyFor the beginning, better start with a blank one and only put exactly that into it, what you really need.
12:29.37mandlaSo guys, should i scrap out what i have on extensions.conf and add exten => _0X.,1,Dial(DAHDI/g2/${EXTEN}) only?
12:30.38WIMPyIf all numbers you want to dial start with 0 and you wan to dial out the 2nd group, yes. But I doubt both.
12:30.45din3shoutgoing call uses group2 in chan_dahdi?
12:31.05WIMPyHave you take a look at how to create dialplans, either in the book or elsewhere?
12:34.08mandlaGuys everything seems to be commented out in chan_dahdi.conf.
12:34.39mandlaLike said before, i prefer doing this without reading.
12:34.47atheosmandla - do you have this added in your chan_dahdi.conf? #include dahdi-channels.conf
12:35.02din3shwithout reading?
12:35.13din3shwoooo that will hurt :)
12:37.31WIMPyNo. It's just not going to work.
12:37.32atheos<PROTECTED>
12:38.10din3shhis chan_dahdi is all commented
12:38.17WIMPyThe dialplan is the most essential part of the Asterisk configuration and personalisation. Without understanding it, you won't be able to make too much use of Asterisk.
12:38.47din3shits like trying to fix a car without having any knowledge on how to work on the engine
12:39.23din3shRTFM!
12:39.25din3sh:D
12:39.32mandlaOk, let me ask a simple question, what should be in chan_dahdi.conf?
12:40.24WIMPyThe basic stuff just for placing calls is rather simple. You don;t have to care about the fancy stuff for now.
12:40.44WIMPychan_dahdi.conf needs the hardware channels you've got.
12:41.05din3shhe doesnt even differentiate basic from fancy cause he doesnt understand the dialplan logic
12:42.02WIMPyYes, but for now, Dial() should be all he needs. But with at least one context and one pattern.
12:44.55*** join/#asterisk ariel_ (~chatzilla@pdpc/supporter/active/abatista)
12:50.44*** join/#asterisk corretico (~luis@201.201.44.82)
12:50.56*** join/#asterisk cneb3000 (~Ben@87.127.15.113)
12:51.43*** join/#asterisk jaytee (~jforde051@unaffiliated/jaytee)
12:57.01*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
12:58.55WIMPymandla: Why did you chose to use Asterisk, BTW?
12:59.43mandlaWhy? It was just orders from the top.
13:00.24mandlaWhat i really need now is to call outside.
13:07.01*** join/#asterisk adyn (~adyn@pdpc/supporter/active/adyn)
13:08.46irrootmandla
13:09.16irrootdude perhaps getting it on a ip address and allowing someone to log in and sort it out ??
13:12.25*** join/#asterisk _Corey_ (~chatzilla@64.121.4.75)
13:14.45*** join/#asterisk Buklov (~Buklov@mail.sapsun.su)
13:14.50*** join/#asterisk ketema (~ketema@kjhmacpro.ketema.net)
13:15.05*** part/#asterisk ketema (~ketema@kjhmacpro.ketema.net)
13:18.19Kattyhi
13:19.29WIMPyKatty: My Asterisk seems to wok. Now I don't know what to do with it. Please help.
13:19.46Kattyoh that's simple.
13:19.48Kattyjust ignore it
13:19.56sxpertWIMPy: hah, so we get sauteed beef & vegetables ?
13:20.01n3hxsWok?  stir it.
13:20.06sxperthehe
13:20.11Kattyspeaking of food
13:20.24Kattyi recently watched a video on the effects of glucose and fructose on the liver.
13:20.28Kattypretty amazing.
13:20.40sxpertmakes you crave for more I'm sure ;)
13:20.40Kattymakes me not want to eat fructose ever again
13:20.46Kattyoh yes.
13:20.55Kattysome nasty stuff.
13:21.01_Corey_no fruit for you?
13:21.09sxpertKatty: yeah, high fructose corn sirup is eeevil
13:21.15sxpert(blame sodas for that crap)
13:21.15Kattyjust as evil as sugar
13:21.22WIMPybetter not to eat at all.
13:21.25Kattybut sugar ratio of glucose to fructose is slightly higher than hfcs
13:21.35*** join/#asterisk puzzled (~patrick@puzzled.xs4all.nl)
13:21.54sxperthigh frequency counter ?
13:21.56Kattyi decided to see just how much sugar i'm consuming.
13:22.01sxperthybrid fiber coax ?
13:22.10adynif I want to kill my liver I'll do it with beer.
13:22.10Katty21g so far today, and it's only breakfast time.
13:22.34Kattyinterestingly enough, fructose has the same effect on the liver as ethanol
13:22.43Kattyexcept your brain can't metabolize fructose, so you don't get a happy buzz
13:22.54sxpertKatty: better have ethanol then ;)
13:23.05adyn+1 for beer then
13:23.09Kattyadyn: oh yes.
13:23.14n3hxsthinks he should look for a way to convert fructose to alcohol.
13:23.26Kattyalchohol is fermented sugar, silly
13:23.28sxpertn3hxs: use bender
13:23.41_Corey_But the corn grower's association has a commercial that says "corn sugar" is like regular sugar!?
13:23.50Kattyit is.
13:24.00Kattyit's a chemical combination of 1 glucose to 1 fructose molecule
13:24.03Kattymuch like sugar.
13:24.22sxpertcorn sugar is pure crap
13:24.23n3hxslooks for the little packet of yeast.
13:24.37_Corey_I love their subtelty tho...  change "corn syrup
13:24.43_Corey_" to "corn sugar"
13:24.43n3hxsand another cup of coffee.
13:24.49Kattyafter some research i found that malt barley syrup and brown rice syrup has no fructose
13:25.05sxpert_Corey_: hehe, they don't fool me
13:25.11Kattythey're mostly glucose. 80% of glucose goes to your muscles and organs for energy
13:25.17sxpertKatty: +2 for guinness then ;)
13:25.21Katty*hee*
13:25.33luckman212guys I have my * server behind my NAT, and my IP phone sitting on my desk, also behind the same NAT.   I've set canreinvite=yes on my Trunk and this works with *outbound* calls, the RTP gets connected directly from the phone <--> ITSP.  however for incoming calls, the call just drops as soon as  I pick up the desk phone.   anyone have success getting this type of setup to work?
13:25.47luckman212localnet= is defined correctly btw.
13:26.22luckman212I've done some wireshark captures and it appears the asterisk is sending an INVITE to my ITSP with  a LAN IP (192.168.x.x) address
13:26.39luckman212which is odd, not sure why it would do that... I have nat=yes defined in my general sip.conf
13:27.10Kattyhfcs was introduced into the american market in 1975. in 1982 the american heart association found a link between LDLs and heart disease, so they told everyone to lower their fat intake from 40% to 30%, and we did. to make up for the lost taste, they added sugar to everything, or hfcs since it was cheaper.
13:27.46Kattylater on, they found that the LDL test needs a trigliceride test along with it to tell if it's good ldl or bad ldl. they found out that dietary fat made good ldl, carbs and sugar made bad ldl.
13:28.13sxpertKatty: depends on the carbs too
13:28.21Kattybut the fda won't touch it now, because you won't immediately get sick from massive fructose consumption because the brain doesn't metabolize it like ethanol
13:28.39Kattysxpert: very true, speaking sugar type carbs here specifically tho
13:28.44sxpertyeah
13:28.50sxpertstuff like bread is good
13:28.55sxpertstuff like coke is evil
13:28.59Kattyand no one else wants to touch it cause of exports
13:29.06Kattycoke is a huge conspiracy, if you ask me
13:29.09atheosall this talk of beer and bread is making me hungary.
13:29.13Kattyin 1985ish, i believe, they came out with New Coke
13:29.33jayteewhich was a flop
13:29.38Kattymore sodium, which makes you pee which leads to thirst. more caffeine, which is more diueretic and happy feelings, and then more sugar to cover up the taste of the sodium
13:29.46*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-tvrlqqzfbfrnerhn)
13:29.53sxpertatheos: so you're a country ?
13:30.00Kattywell more caffieine which makes you pee, then more sodium, and then more sugar...or hfcs
13:30.05Kattythey knew what they were doing
13:30.10sxpertyeah
13:30.13sxpertthis shit is evil
13:30.15Kattyand juice has nearly as much sugar as coke does
13:30.22Kattybut it's WIC approved
13:30.24atheos<PROTECTED>
13:30.24Kattygo figure that out
13:30.25jayteehfcs is an alien conspiracy to fatten us all up. the harvester ships are coming!
13:30.29*** join/#asterisk ariel_ (~chatzilla@pdpc/supporter/active/abatista)
13:30.37Kattyhfcs is japan's way of getting back at us ;)
13:30.43Kattyeither that or china? i forget which
13:30.49Kattythey invented it in 1966 tho
13:31.26jayteeread some of the horror stories about aspartame and you'll never use artificial sweetener in anything again
13:31.29Kattyyou ever get yourself off soda for awhile, and then try to drink it again?
13:31.38Kattyi actually stopped aspartame because it made me hungry
13:31.48sxperteven worse than than
13:31.49WIMPyin this channel hfcs is usually something that comes from Cologne.
13:31.49Kattyi knew there was no way i'd get my diet under control if i was drinking aspartame
13:31.51sxpertthat
13:32.09adynone of my friends did an experiment and tried to get off all processed sugars.
13:32.20jayteeone of it's components is wood alchohol and it breaks down into formaldehyde and a neurotoxin when stored over 85 degrees. the higher the temp, the more formaldehyde.
13:32.21sxpertaspartam in drinks leads to methanol poisoning when bottles are exposed to sunlight's UVs
13:32.22adynthey had withdrawl symptoms very close to a drug addicts
13:32.26Kattyadyn: were they able to?
13:32.29adynyes
13:32.30Kattydoen't surprise me
13:32.47Kattyjaytee: wow, nice.
13:32.59Kattyglad i stopped drinking it
13:33.13jayteeand we owe our thanks to Donald Rumsfeld, former Sec of Defense who before he did that was CEO of Searle.
13:33.22atheosisn't aspartame being linked to the gulf war syndrome a popular conspiracy theory?
13:33.29adynit was a college funded experiment so they were provided meals. While another group ate nothing but processed sugars (well as close to nothing as you can get and still get nutrition). And then another group just ate whatever they wanted.
13:33.34atheosI think I heard/read that somewhere
13:33.44jayteeFDA shot down aspartame the first time around until Rumsfeld got his buddies in the Reagan admin. to appoint a new head of the FDA who would play ball.
13:33.45sxpertnah, that's from "depleted" (my ass) uranium shells
13:34.02Kattyjaytee: i can believe that for sure
13:34.25Kattyjaytee: i consider aspartame just another piece of the coke conspiracy
13:34.26atheossomething about the desert heat mixed with diet coke = problems
13:34.36adynthe person that was off sugar totally had more energy, was more alert, and ended up in better physical condition than the others.
13:34.39Kattyjaytee: just about everyone i talk to says that diet coke makes them hungrier than usual
13:34.44jayteethere were some studies that tried to link GWS to aspartame but nothing conclusive. More likely the depleted uranium or some bacterial agents or nerve compounds that were present in some areas.
13:34.47sxpertjaytee: as well, 9/11 was a nice way to disguise actual explosives based building implosion
13:35.13*** join/#asterisk kaldemar (~kaldemar@unaffiliated/kaldemar)
13:35.25_Corey_I'm reminded of Al Pacino's rant against sugar in Scent of a Woman...
13:35.34Kattyi'm not sure how you can eat processed foods and expect to get all the vitamins and minerals you need.
13:35.46Kattythey rip all the fiber out to reduce cooking time
13:35.59Kattyi guess a lot of things are fortified tho, aren't they
13:36.19atheosbrawndo, it's got electrolytes
13:36.32_Corey_haha, that's what we need
13:36.46sxpertatheos: hahaha
13:36.46atheoswell, it is what plants crave.
13:36.57atheosI freakin love that movie
13:36.58sxpertwhich is why they don't grow
13:37.00sxpertyeah
13:37.04sxpertthat was awesome
13:37.19Kattyidk, but i don't ever see any pro athletes drinking sports drinks
13:37.24Kattyyou see that gatorade am stuff?
13:37.32Kattyi think it's marketed towards kids.
13:37.38*** join/#asterisk DND (~ctcarino@94.200.7.26)
13:37.54DNDhi guys. what's the major difference between 1.4 and 1.6
13:37.55DND?
13:38.24DNDbecause we wanted to have this zoho phonebridge on our new asterisk but it only supports 1.4.
13:38.31DNDwill i loose some important features?
13:38.40DNDwe are using asterisknow by the way
13:40.03kaldemarDND: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.6.2.18/CHANGES http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.6.2.18/UPGRADE-1.6.txt
13:40.49*** join/#asterisk razu (~razu@2001:ad0:1:1:202:b3ff:fe36:921c)
13:41.27KobazDND: i'm not aware of any feature removals between 1.4 and 1.6 but there are breaking api changes
13:41.37*** join/#asterisk epsolon77 (~jstann@70-91-80-37-washingtondc.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
13:41.45epsolon77can anyone hear me?
13:41.54ChainsawYes, we copy.
13:41.58ChainsawPlease proceed with your question.
13:42.14epsolon77Thank you chainsaw, I actually don't have one
13:42.27epsolon77I've was having issues with another channel, and knew the people here were friendly
13:42.58ChainsawAh, okay :)
13:43.14Kattyidk about that.
13:43.18Kattyi'm sooooo not friendly
13:43.20Kattyshakes fist
13:43.40epsolon77you don't happen to know the max number of NAT's configurable on dd-wrt do you?
13:43.43epsolon77:-D
13:43.44sunfoneWhew... just finished my breakfast of pure aspartame and fructose corn syrup
13:43.52beekhugs Katty
13:43.52Kattysunfone: go go liver
13:43.56Kattyhugs beek
13:44.00Kattybeek: ohai, howrechu
13:44.03beekSee -- katty is friendly!
13:44.05Kattyepsolon77: i don't know off hand.
13:44.09Kattybeek: shhhhhhhh
13:44.15Kattybeek: i have a reputation to uphold!
13:44.30Chainsawis lucky enough to find aspartame disgusting
13:44.33epsolon77thanks Katty, I figured no one would know
13:44.39sunfonenow for coffee and splenda...
13:44.42epsolon77I'm just going to have to try it and find out
13:44.44epsolon77darn
13:44.48beekaspartame has an awful aftertaste.
13:44.55Kattyya some people say it tastes bitter
13:44.58Chainsawbeek: I wonder if that's the aspartame or the filler.
13:44.58epsolon77I'll have to play with something new...woah is me
13:45.02Kattyi never noticed it, but it sure did make me hungry
13:45.03epsolon77I'm a real sugar guy
13:45.26Chainsawbeek: Aspartame is so sweet compared to sugar it's 3% aspartame and 97% filler, at least on coffee sweetener.
13:45.28beekDon't know.  But it can really ruin an otherwise delicious glass of iced tea.
13:45.33Chainsawnods in agreement
13:45.41Kattyalso agrees
13:46.21ChainsawThis is why I could never switch to diet coke or coke zero. So I did the right thing and gave it up entirely.
13:46.30Kattyit's pretty amazing how much less i eat without drinking soda anymore
13:46.38epsolon77I am so glad others feel this way
13:46.50KattyChainsaw: 1, 12oz can, of coke translates to about 8lbs of fat a year
13:46.54epsolon77I can't stand diet coke, but I'm in an office full of people that think it helps them lose weight
13:46.54Kattyi think
13:47.04ChainsawKatty: Better for your teeth as well.
13:47.06Kattyepsolon77: sadly, it doesn't :<
13:47.10atheosKatty - 1 per day?
13:47.11KattyChainsaw: true dat
13:47.14epsolon77it's the carbonation that gets your teeth
13:47.27Chainsawepsolon77: The acidity doesn't help.
13:47.27Kattyatheos: yes pretty sure, could be more tho
13:47.39Kattyatheos: i think my 8lb number may have came from the 1955 8oz bottle
13:47.40beekPhosphoric acid is what hurts the teeth.
13:47.55epsolon77well carbonic acid as well, which is the carbonation
13:47.59atheosI can believe that.  I drink about 1-2 a month. I think they are about 150 calories each
13:48.12Kattyyep
13:48.18epsolon77and as I recall there's more molar capability from the carbonic then from the phosphoric, but my wife's the chemist, not I
13:48.20ChainsawI've switched to 1 coffee in the morning (no milk, no sugar) and 100% tea afterwards (milk, no sugar).
13:48.32Kattymilk has sugar in it
13:48.34epsolon77careful of kidney stones
13:48.35Kattybut it's milk sugar
13:48.39Kattynot very sweet at all
13:48.40beekI'm just quoting my dentist who was explaining why soda is evil.
13:48.49epsolon77I'm a big tea drinker and it got me a lovely stone
13:48.51Kattyi'm going to try unsweetened almond milk
13:49.00Kattyi hear it's lower in sugar, and still tastes pretty good
13:49.06Chainsawepsolon77: It's always something isn't it.
13:49.18Kattythe more unrefied sugar i can get out of my diet, the happer my  liver will be about it
13:49.26epsolon77beek, I'm not going to say I'm deffintaly right, in any case the end result is --soda---bad for body
13:49.39*** join/#asterisk becca_r (~IceChat77@72.165.148.230)
13:49.40epsolon77however geeks like me will die without caffinee...
13:49.49Kattygeeks everywhere will agree soda is bad for you.
13:49.56epsolon77chainsaw, yes, except kidney stones are a ver BIG something
13:50.00Kattyepsolon77: try switching to tea
13:50.07Kattyepsolon77: iced tea, what country are you in?
13:50.17beekI have no pulse without caffiene.
13:50.25Kattybeek: me either, i'm a literal zombie without it
13:50.31Kattybeek: and a cranky mean zombie at that
13:50.40Kattyhas tea tho
13:50.42Sylnaisugar and caffeine are the best way to code
13:50.45ChainsawKatty: Yeah, I have the 1 high-octane no frills coffee to start me up.
13:50.57epsolon77katty, I do drink mostly tea, however I ended up witha  kidney stone that put me on some great pain meds for a week
13:50.59KattyChainsaw: not a fan of that coffee taste :<
13:51.00jayteewhen I tried getting off caffeine I ended up having tachycardia and dizzy spells
13:51.00epsolon77and I'm in the US
13:51.04beekWent to the doctor's for a checkup.   BP:  125/65.    And that was AFTER two mugs of coffee, a large glass of iced tea and a diet pepsi.
13:51.07*** join/#asterisk dandre (~daniel@ble59-2-81-56-122-47.fbx.proxad.net)
13:51.12epsolon77sylnai I'm right with you
13:51.16Kattyepsolon77: i don't think you got the kidney stone from drinking tea
13:51.18epsolon77I can't stand coffee
13:51.31Kattyepsolon77: can you tolerate the taste of splenda?
13:51.33beekI have an alter to coffee in the machine room:
13:51.50beekFrench press, kitchenaide grinder, freshly-roasted beans.
13:51.53Kattyjaytee: what's tachycardia?
13:51.57epsolon77katty, yes you do.  It increases the uric acid and calcium in the blood stream which then becomes a specific type of kidney stones
13:51.59jayteerapid heart beat
13:52.07Kattyepsolon77: ahh, i see.
13:52.12epsolon77and that stone looks like a mace head with especially pointy spikes all over it
13:52.17Kattyepsolon77: is that something that will eventually come to past?
13:52.22*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@210.17.219.183)
13:52.25Kattyerm pass
13:52.30Kattyepsolon77: or will tea always do that to you?
13:52.33jayteeultrasound breaks up the stones in most cases
13:52.49epsolon77katty: yes they pass, but it hurts like holey heck twice over until it does
13:52.50Kattyjaytee: not sure i've ever had a rapid heart beat when coming off caffeine
13:53.00jayteenot everyone does
13:53.02Kattyepsolon77: no i mean will you continue to get kidney stones if you keep drinking tea
13:53.23jayteedepends on your metabolism and genetics
13:53.29epsolon77katty: I get you now, yes, if you drink too much tea it could cause kidney stones
13:53.33jayteenot everyone gets kidney stones
13:53.39Kattyjaytee: what did you do? ween yourself off slowly or just take it easy?
13:53.44epsolon77very true jaytee
13:53.44ChainsawIt's certainly not happened to me, and I've been drinking tea for a long while.
13:53.56jayteeI weaned slowly but in retrospect not slowly enough
13:54.06Kattynods
13:54.15Kattyhow much were you drinking per day?
13:54.32ChainsawAnd was it tea/coffee or something more concentrated?
13:54.33Katty^- jaytee
13:54.33epsolon77katty: I'd say about 5 cups per day
13:54.41jayteemy grandmother drank several cups of tea every day. lived to be 93 and never had a kidney stone. in the end it was pancreatic cancer.
13:54.46epsolon77chainsaw: no regular old lipton tea
13:54.52Kattyepsolon77: i drink more tea than that now, so i'm guessing no kidney stones in the near future for me, phew
13:55.03epsolon77jatee: well I can't say the kidney stone will kill you, though you may wish it did
13:55.09Chainsawjaytee: Great grandmother made it to 97 on mostly tea, yeah.
13:55.23Kattyi'm sure it was more than just tea that made her live that long
13:55.32jayteekidney stones can cause excruciating pain
13:55.33ChainsawKatty: Sheer willpower.
13:55.38Kattynow that i can believe ;)
13:55.49epsolon77katty: It also has somethign to do with how much water you mix in there, if you get dehydrated you become more likely to get a kidney stone, and men are more likely to get them then women
13:55.59Kattyah hmm.
13:56.08Kattyi do 1 lipton cold brew tea bag, with 1c of splenda
13:56.11Kattyand then 1 gallon of water
13:56.23jayteeI remember my dad lying on the floor pounding his fist and his face was all red from the pain.
13:56.30Kattyjaytee: oh my :<
13:56.37Kattyi sure hope i never get one
13:56.49Kattythe appendix joining the other side was bad enough
13:56.53epsolon77jaytee: the pain was great enough to make me puke and pass out
13:56.59Katty^- appendix
13:57.07jayteeback then all they could do was surgery. now they have ultrasound treatments that can break up the larger stones into small particles that will pass.
13:57.12epsolon77katty: i hope NO ONE gets one, howvere that jsut won't be
13:57.15Kattywell, almost pass out. i felt it coming and layed down real quick
13:57.37Kattyyay for new technology
13:57.37epsolon77katty: no I passed out laying down
13:57.41jayteeyeah
13:57.42Kattyepsolon77: poor thing :<
13:57.55epsolon77katty: but yes, appendicitus sucks too
13:57.59jayteewe still can't cure cancer but we can give 80 year old men erections though :-)
13:58.16Kattyepsolon77: honestly, the fear at the hospital was worse than the whole appendix thing
13:58.19epsolon77jaytee: yeah, with pills that give you cancer
13:58.32coppicebig pharma goes where the money is
13:58.44jayteemy appendix almost ruptured. I was in convulsions on the floor of my barracks latrine when a buddy found me and took me to the emergency room at the base hospital
13:58.51*** join/#asterisk becca_r (~IceChat77@72.165.148.230)
13:59.08jayteecoppice, very, very true! sad but true.
13:59.38coppicealthough in this case they focussed on the hard up
13:59.48epsolon77if anyone wants a reason not to take viagra and the like, go research how the treat the "go to a doctor if you have an erection lasting more than 4 hours" issue
14:00.04jayteeshunts
14:00.20epsolon77bit needle with muscle relaxers where no man wants a needle
14:00.22beekSame kind of thing killed "Olean" non-fat cooking oil.    One of the possible side effects:  anal leakage.
14:00.25epsolon77gig*
14:00.28epsolon77crap
14:00.30epsolon77big*
14:00.35epsolon77EPIC typing fail
14:01.18epsolon77sigh, I'm currently in a fight with my father in law over who is paying for my son's birthday party
14:01.27jayteeGod made sugar, man made Aspartame, God made pot, man made booze. Who do you trust?
14:01.38JerJerPOT
14:01.55epsolon77actually little bacteria made booze...man just figured out how to make it strong enough to kill us with it
14:01.59jayteebig pharma is one of the biggest opponents of medical marijuana.
14:02.10coppiceI don't trust anyone referencing creatures from bad fiction
14:02.22beekcoppice:  +1
14:02.27epsolon77I don't have a problem with marijana, but you would have to restrict it from driving and crap
14:02.34jayteeif people were able to use it legally big pharma wouldn't sell as much anti-depressants.
14:02.37beekepsolon77: Like alcohol
14:02.40coppiceyeast makes booze. its a fungus, not a bacteria
14:02.41_Corey_goes back to his bowl of Soylent Green
14:02.56jaytee"It's made from people!!!"
14:03.04epsolon77coppice: thank you for the correction
14:03.04sxpert_Corey_: we're tuesday. tuesday is day of soylent yellow !
14:03.18coppice"We let people into our secrets"
14:03.23_Corey_:)
14:03.38*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
14:03.39epsolon77point is still there though, beer and wine is actually very healthy though
14:03.44epsolon77when used in moderation
14:04.07epsolon77a glass of red wine a day is great for your heart, two will shorten your life
14:04.08*** join/#asterisk Praise (~Fat@unaffiliated/praise)
14:04.10coppicecyanide is delicious, when used in moderation
14:04.16WIMPyepsolon77: So what to do, when you're not a Radio DJ or something? :-)
14:04.46*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@196.25.195.42)
14:05.00epsolon77WIMPy: I don't get it....and I'm being serious
14:05.30*** part/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
14:05.30jayteelooks like today Anonymous is launching a campaign against the Federal Reserve and Bernanke
14:05.33WIMPyIf you've got no mederation going on.
14:05.42WIMPyAnd that was not serious.
14:06.04*** join/#asterisk sourcode (~code@ppp-58-8-90-32.revip2.asianet.co.th)
14:06.18jaytee"Surely you can't be serious?" "I am serious....and don't call me Shirley!"
14:06.56*** join/#asterisk celord (~celord@201.198.102.2)
14:07.19epsolon77WIMPy: I'm doing too many things to understand this thing called "humor" right now
14:07.29epsolon77sorry
14:07.52epsolon77and I am so far out of the alcohol thing I miss most jokes referring to it
14:08.00epsolon77I can't stand the taste
14:08.07epsolon77my record is 6 wine coolers in one year
14:08.23jayteeah! a binge drinker
14:08.39Kattygrins
14:08.58tzangermorning
14:08.58n3hxsBungie drinker.. right through the nose.
14:09.11epsolon77I take that back, I do drink religously
14:09.16epsolon77a sip of wine every sunday
14:09.28Kattyhi tzanger
14:09.34Kattyi drink rarely, has too many calories
14:09.40Kattyand i'd rather eat my calories than drink them
14:09.43beeksleeps in on Sunday and has a glass of wine in the evening.
14:09.47tzangerI think it was W.C. Fields. "Water? Never touch the stuff. The fish fuck in it."
14:09.48epsolon77katty: HERE HERE!
14:09.53tzangermorning Katty
14:09.58jayteeI could never get on board with that whole transubstantiation thing.
14:10.06epsolon77tzanger: too true too true
14:10.18epsolon77tzanger: but I'm sure someoen enjoys that thought...
14:10.20Kattywater's so icky
14:10.20beekjaytee: Legitimizing canabalism?
14:10.28jayteebeek, exactly
14:10.32Kattymom's water is good tho.
14:10.38Kattywell water
14:10.47jayteefull of arsenic
14:10.56tzangertwo cannibals are eating a clown. one stops, turns to the other and says "wait... does this taste funny to you?"
14:11.02tzangerwell water > *
14:11.06epsolon77katty: OHHHHHh.....for a second I thought you were referring to the "water" your mom makes, and I was getting worried
14:11.07*** join/#asterisk [sr] (~Unknowned@pa8-84-91-197-8.netvisao.pt)
14:11.08[sr]howdy
14:11.09_Corey_Whiskey is the water of life...  don't forget that
14:11.15Katty[sr]: howdy
14:11.16beektzanger: bah-dum-bum.
14:11.16coppicearsenic? must be near a fab :-)
14:11.20tzangerbeek: yes.
14:11.21[sr]hi Katty
14:11.30[sr]is there any default option to hang up call's when they are on hold?
14:11.47[sr]my setup hang's up them and I don't remember setting nothing
14:11.56[sr]after 5m +-
14:12.04epsolon77I try to avoid hanging up.....
14:12.13epsolon77I know you can call the hangup function inside the dialplan...
14:12.19epsolon77but I don't know if that helps you
14:12.46[sr]not much
14:13.36epsolon77[sr]: you are trying to get your system to hang up on anyone that has held from more than 5 min?
14:14.05[sr]no
14:14.21[sr]they'r hanging up!!!! 'n i don't remember setting nothing on this matter
14:14.30*** join/#asterisk McBoingbo (~McBoingbo@mail.hrsg.ca)
14:14.31epsolon77ok, so the exect oposite
14:14.31[sr]maybe it's a new default on 1.8x
14:14.41epsolon77I couldn't imagine that
14:14.55*** join/#asterisk Tech_Travis (~Travis_El@cpe-76-168-191-127.socal.res.rr.com)
14:14.56McBoingboAnyone know of a good VOIP provider in Brazil? We are in Canada
14:15.15epsolon77I know of a decent asterisk compatible provider in canada...
14:15.46epsolon77[sr]:is there possibly an extension that is getting rung after a timeout?
14:16.00epsolon77like an operator group that is dialed when the call is on hold too long?
14:16.06*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
14:16.13[sr]the test is calling two internal extensions
14:16.14McBoingbono, we are IN Canada using Babytel, but Babytel does not go as far out as Brazil, so need to get a local number there and tie it to our Asterisk server here
14:16.21[sr]just did the 2nd test and hang up again
14:16.49McBoingboI can google easy enough, but I would prefer a company that has been tried before
14:17.01WIMPy[sr]: Any info on the console?
14:17.06tzafrir_laptoptries pushing rapid-tunneling once again: http://rapid-tunneling.sourceforge.net/README.html
14:17.07epsolon77McBoingbo:I can't say that I do sorry
14:17.15[sr]WIMPy: only normal hangup info
14:17.54tzafrir_laptopdebs are available from http://updates.xorcom.com/pkg-voip/repo-i386-sid/pool/main/r/rapid-tunneling/
14:18.12tzafrir_laptopI believe they'll work for practically any deb distro
14:18.28*** join/#asterisk putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
14:18.28*** mode/#asterisk [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
14:19.28epsolon77[sr]: are you calling into a hunt group that rings to two extensions?
14:19.41[sr]no, 1 extension only
14:20.21epsolon77I would look for a if busy hangup call, but it's been a while since i've done dialplan programming
14:20.51epsolon77where it's not actually putting it on hold, just ringing the extension, and it will only ring for x seconds before hanging up
14:21.45epsolon77ok I have to run...later all!
14:21.47*** part/#asterisk epsolon77 (~jstann@70-91-80-37-washingtondc.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
14:23.13*** join/#asterisk KavanS (~KavanS@LINBIT/KavanS)
14:24.12[sr]tau, 5m after the hold started, it hangup
14:26.03*** join/#asterisk _pepo_ (c837e07d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.200.55.224.125)
14:26.07_pepo_hi friends
14:26.26*** join/#asterisk din3sh (~din3sh@41.136.102.76)
14:26.33_pepo_please, how do I change the number of caller when do a call?
14:27.31*** join/#asterisk The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel)
14:27.52din3shSET CALLERID
14:28.03din3shuse SET CALLERID
14:28.07*** join/#asterisk fulcan (~root@li345-191.members.linode.com)
14:28.35_pepo_thanks
14:32.03Kobazcore show function CALLERID
14:32.04Kobazfor more info
14:32.56fulcancan someone explain to me why -> http://pastebin.com/Y2901nUP would fundamentally 'not' work?
14:33.37*** join/#asterisk Ad-Hoc (~nimbus@athedsl-392953.home.otenet.gr)
14:34.08beekfulcan: Line 1 of context [7185696200] needs to be sequence 1
14:34.22_Corey_You're missing an argument in your Goto
14:34.24beekLine 18 of your listing.
14:35.02*** join/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
14:38.00fulcanbeek would the 718 context require answer?
14:38.48fulcan_Corey_ the pattern match?
14:39.11*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-171-103-215.ip.telfort.nl)
14:39.13Kattychugs 16 oz of tea
14:39.24Kattywaits for brain to de-fuzzify
14:39.31_Corey_Your goto is not right, Goto(context,exten,pri)
14:39.33beekfulcan: Only if you haven't done so before.  The "answer" persists between contexts.
14:41.30ruben23hi guys anyone have chance to help, i got this issue on my asterisk---> http://i52.tinypic.com/23ixank.jpg ----> i already installed fail2ban on it.
14:43.30adynblock the IP yourself using iptables
14:44.43beekKatty:  De-fuzzification completed?
14:44.51Kattywell, it's better.
14:45.04Kattyi think i'm gonna need some more tho
14:45.55[sr]brb
14:51.23luckman212guys I have my * server behind my NAT, and my IP phone sitting on my desk, also behind the same NAT. I've set canreinvite=yes on my Trunk and this works with *outbound* calls, the RTP gets connected directly from the phone <--> ITSP. however for incoming calls, the call just drops as soon as I pick up the desk phone. anyone have success getting this type of setup to work?
14:52.02luckman212localnet= is defined correctly, and I've done some wireshark captures and it appears the asterisk is sending an INVITE to my ITSP with a LAN IP (192.168.x.x) address -- which is odd, not sure why it would do that... I have nat=yes defined in my general sip.conf
14:56.50WIMPyluckman212: Unless your firewall/router intercepts that reinvite, spoofs it and dynamically forwards some port to your phone, you'll be outofluckman212.
14:58.08luckman212WIMPy: why?  the fw doesn't block outbound connection... * should send out the INVITE with the WAN IP address and the port that my phone is accepting media on, wouldn't there be a pinhole open for that RTP port?
14:58.40WIMPyWhere could that possibly come from?
14:58.54luckman212I don't see how this would be any different if my * server was out on some public IP somewhere, it would still need to send the INVITE if I don't want all the media proxied
14:59.43luckman212I thought that's how RTP behind a nat worked, doesn't the phone send out a few packets to open up the pinhole for whatever port its receiving media on
15:00.12luckman212I mean, this *does* work 100% fine for outbound calls initiated from inside the nat.
15:00.21WIMPyIt's possible, but noone knows if the port stays the same.
15:00.26luckman212and I checked to make sure media is direct, not flowing through the * box
15:00.48luckman212oh yeah for sure the port definitely does change
15:01.28WIMPyYou could always write the 436th addition to SIP to support a passive mode RTP "connection".
15:02.04luckman212hmm
15:02.30luckman212so how do hosted voip companies provide their service then, without taking over the customer's firewall completely?
15:03.03*** join/#asterisk jaskew (~jdaskew@netblock-75-79-182-110.dslextreme.com)
15:03.49luckman212i don't understand how a phone, behind a nat, could accept an inbound connection + RTP (with a somewhat-randomized incoming port) without first opening up some sort of pinhole after responding to the INVITE
15:05.00*** join/#asterisk dandre (~daniel@ble59-2-81-56-122-47.fbx.proxad.net)
15:09.48*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
15:09.51drmessanoluckman212, if you were using a hosted PBX, each phone would be registered to the host and have its own connection through the firewall
15:10.15luckman212drmessano: but when you say "connection" I assume you mean SIP registration, but what does that have to do with RTP?
15:11.42drmessanoEach phone will negotitate its own RTP stream with the host.. It's well documented how this works with a device behind a NAT.. your scenario involves a PBX behind the NAT, a call coming in from a host outside the NAT, and an invite to another device behind the NAT.. of course it's not going to work..
15:15.23*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
15:15.34luckman212I don't really see how the PBX being either behind or in front of the NAT makes any difference, sorry if I'm being thick about it
15:16.32luckman212either way the PBX should be sending the SDP saying essentially "I've got an endpoint at IP 44.55.66.77 (public/wan IP) that wants to accept media on port 45678 ...
15:16.51luckman212whether it sends that packet from behind the NAT or outside of it, shouldn't make any difference?
15:17.23drmessano<PROTECTED>
15:17.48luckman212no that isn't what I meant
15:17.56drmessanoIt's what you should have meant
15:18.49luckman212if the PBX is communicating with a device on the other side of the NAT (which it should know based on the localnet= directive) then it should alter the IP sent out in the SDP,  at the same time, if two endpoints both behind the NAT are attempting to set up a call, then it should retain the local subnet (192.x.x.x)
15:19.09luckman212I thought that was the whole point of the nat=yes + localnet= settings
15:19.14drmessanothen it should alter the IP sent out in the SDP  <--- NO
15:19.27luckman212drmessano: again sorry to be thick but, why not?
15:19.29drmessanoFor itself as a SIP CLIENT
15:19.36drmessanoAsterisk is a B2BUA
15:20.02drmessanoAs far as Asterisk is concerned, when you ask Asterisk about that device, it's on a private subnet
15:20.04*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm)
15:20.15drmessanoThat's how Asterisk is communicating with the device.. that's all it knows
15:20.51*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
15:21.49drmessanoThe point of NAT=YES and your localnet is to EXCLUDE it from replacing the External IP in the SDP.  Otherwise, all hosts are external
15:22.11*** join/#asterisk awclin (~alinford@80.169.133.251)
15:22.31luckman212how could that be all it knows?  it knows that it is behind a nat, and it knows that there's a channel on a public IP that needs to be bridged to a UA on a private IP that is on it's own subnet, so I don't see where there's a breakdown that causes Ast to send out an INVITE to a device on the public internet with a 192.168.x.x address (I mean this should never happen right?  it's totally invalid...)
15:23.21*** join/#asterisk emsLinux (~emsLinux@190.251.101.201)
15:24.06drmessanoThere is no concept of valid or invalid addresses... why do you think we need to force externip and those lovely localnet settings.. SIP needs to be begged into behaving properly..
15:24.18*** join/#asterisk shtoom (shtoom@14.96.192.52)
15:24.19emsLinuxGood morning, i have a question, maybe u guys can help me. I want to change the default e-mail text from the Asterisk e-mail notification, also de the language to espanish when a user speaks that language, can anyone help me with this?
15:25.13luckman212drmessano: I guess I have a lot to learn.   I am not trying to be rude I do appreciate your guidance.  I just really don't see why it works for an outbound call but not an inbound one... that's where I am getting stuck
15:25.37psilikonemsLinux, email for vm?
15:25.51*** join/#asterisk arielb27 (~chatzilla@pdpc/supporter/active/abatista)
15:25.58luckman212asterisk is handling the SIP signalling between my local UA and the external ITSP, and yet it *IS* able to bridge the call successfully removing itself from the media path
15:26.00emsLinuxyes, for the voicemail, just to let know my clients they have a new voicemail
15:26.09psilikonemsLinux, voicemail.conf
15:27.25psilikonemsLinux, Look for 'emailbody='
15:27.29*** join/#asterisk _Corey_ (~chatzilla@64.121.4.75)
15:29.17emsLinuxfound it, but is commented, im using FreePBX, i don't know if the framework uses another file to specified the message, am i wrong?
15:29.24sunfoneAm struggling with a Polycom IP650, a smattering of IP335s (7), and BLF... they are all configured to watch each other, so I would expect "core show hints" to show 8 watchers all the time... but instead I see a random number of watchers between 0 and 8 for each extension... and the IP650 sometimes "loses" the hint for a phone and its blinking... anyone have Polycom BLF experience?
15:30.26sunfoneemslinux: you want vm_email.inc
15:30.39sunfoneyou can safely change it
15:31.21emsLinuxi see, im gonna check it
15:31.57emsLinuxis vm_email.inc at /etc/asterisk/ ?
15:32.12emsLinuxyes it is :)
15:33.24*** join/#asterisk cVsup (~cVsup@189.107.161.175)
15:36.40luckman212drmessano: do you have any suggestions for reading up on the various NAT scenarios?  I know the voip-info links but was looking for any other reading material
15:37.26sunfoneluckman: why do you care if the RTP path is separate if your ast and your phone are on the same LAN?
15:37.27drmessanoThe SIP RFC's
15:37.35*** part/#asterisk cVsup (~cVsup@189.107.161.175)
15:38.55*** join/#asterisk heise2k (~rheise@static-108-16-123-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net)
15:39.54luckman212sunfone: because I have a very small pbx, with a very small cpu, and I just dont want it needlessly proxying media or transcoding & introducing latency if it doesn't have to
15:41.04leifmadsenif it isn't transcoding, the amount of processing asterisk has to due is negligible
15:41.13JerJerluckman212:  you may want to look into Kamailio
15:41.20leifmadsen+1
15:41.41sunfoneluckman: how many simultaneous calls do you expect?
15:41.52fulcancurious if someone could point me in the right direction on a record/call forward issue.  http://pastebin.com/5TYaucX9
15:42.01JerJerI have deployed a few embedded solutions that utilize just kamailio
15:42.19sunfoneJerJer: cool!
15:42.25leifmadsenfulcan: dialplan problem:   exten => 7185696200,n,DBget(temp=CFIM/7185696200) ; Get CFIM key, if not existing, goto 102
15:42.29leifmadsenDBget() does not exist
15:42.33leifmadsenjust like the console tells you
15:42.40luckman212JerJer: is that similar to sipproxd?
15:42.50JerJerluckman212:  i doubt it
15:43.04leifmadsenruns off to lunch
15:43.15JerJerjust ate lunch
15:43.29luckman212leifmadsen: the problem is, my deskphone supports g722 so, asterisk sets up every call as a transoded one, coding g722<->ulaw because of course the trunk only does ulaw
15:43.38leifmadsenok...
15:43.39luckman212so yeah it does wind up doing a lot of xcoding
15:43.56leifmadsenmake ulaw the preferred codec then
15:43.57irrootsomething is borked in event.c
15:44.02leifmadsenirroot: yep
15:44.07JerJerand/or Disable G.722
15:44.08leifmadsenirroot: see ASTERISK-18002
15:44.09irrootMWI subscriptions
15:44.15leifmadsenalready found :)
15:44.20irrootpatching
15:44.33leifmadsenirroot: check with rmudgett if you can since he is supposed to be working on it
15:44.36sunfoneluckman: so do you keep g722 on to talk internally then?
15:44.48luckman212sunfone: yes or to dial SIP uri's
15:44.59fulcanleifmadsen I took out the variable from the web sample and replaced it with a static entry. Wouldn't "exten => 7185696200,n,DBget(temp=CFIM/7185696200)" be the correct syntax?
15:45.01irrootok got it working again by hack job
15:45.11leifmadsenfulcan: not if DBget() doesn't exist
15:45.26luckman212leifmadsen: if I make ulaw the preferred codec I think the phone would never use g722 for anything, since just about everything supports ulaw
15:45.53leifmadsenit should negotiate to ulaw if both end points support it
15:45.57JerJermake asterisk's preferred codec ulaw
15:45.58leifmadsenonly transcoding when there is no common codec
15:46.02fulcanleifmadsen it is saying that the asterisk database does not exist?
15:46.31leifmadsenfulcan: it is saying the DBget() application does not exist
15:46.33leifmadsennothing more
15:46.41leifmadsenyou probably want the DB() function
15:46.49leifmadsenSet(Result=$(DB(foo/bar)})
15:46.59luckman212leifmadsen: would I do this in the peer definition? i.e. allow=ulaw&g722
15:47.04leifmadsenno
15:47.09leifmadsenallow=g722
15:47.11leifmadsenallow=ulaw
15:47.19irroottwo lines ^^^
15:47.36leifmadsenok I really am going to lunch
15:47.39leifmadsenis NOT HERE
15:47.48Qwellhey leifmadsen
15:48.01luckman212so the codecs are prioritized in the reverse order of their position in the .conf?
15:49.19irrootis on way home
15:49.39fulcanleifmadsen replace with 'exten => 7185696200,n,DB(result=CFIM/7185696200)'?
15:52.02fulcan?
15:56.31WIMPyCFIM? Is that american for CFU?
15:56.43fulcanleifmadsen DB gives the same application error. Am I missing a third party application or something?
15:58.51fulcanWIMPy that is simply the only example of a standard call forward on voip-info that I could find. it appears to be an asterisk db function.
15:59.28leifmadsenfulcan: you didn't read what I wrote before
15:59.33leifmadsenDB() function
15:59.35leifmadsennot application
15:59.48leifmadsenSet(Result=${DB(foo/bar)})
15:59.53leifmadsenQwell: ohai!
16:00.07leifmadsenluckman212: no, they are prioritized from top to bottom
16:00.32leifmadsenfulcan: I suggest reading....
16:00.34leifmadsen~thebook
16:00.34infobotAsterisk: The Definitive Guide, 3rd Edition (ISBN 0-596-51734-3) available at http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596517342. Asterisk: The Definitive Guide is released under a Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) and is available for reading online at http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/, or ~buybook
16:02.59fulcanleifmadsen nothing on callforwarding so that's about 500 pages of useless info at this point.
16:03.13leifmadsenfulcan: except for learning how to write a dialplan
16:03.50fulcanleifmadsen I need a forward and then I am done.
16:03.50luckman212leifmadsen: I bought "the book" :) but which version contains the most up-to-date info?  is the ofps version updated with errata?
16:17.19*** part/#asterisk awclin (~alinford@80.169.133.251)
16:19.30*** join/#asterisk jacobkiers (~jacobkier@82-168-215-74.ip.telfort.nl)
16:19.30*** join/#asterisk becca_r (~IceChat77@72.165.148.230)
16:19.53*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-188-237-245-50.moldtelecom.md)
16:25.36*** join/#asterisk cyborg-one (1000@188-115-172-249.broadband.tenet.odessa.ua)
16:26.19fulcandoes -> "Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/teliax-0000000e' status is 'UNKNOWN'' mean that it can't find the outbound context?
16:26.56Chainsawfulcan: Generally that means your extension numbering leaves to be desired.
16:27.06Chainsawfulcan: i.e. you go 1 2 3 n n n n n 10
16:27.21Chainsawfulcan: Which you can't do. From n to an explicit number needs a goto.
16:27.44WIMPyOr a label.
16:28.03WIMPyInstead of an explicit number, that is.
16:28.40Chainsawnods
16:29.53*** join/#asterisk hobodave (~hobodave@pdpc/supporter/professional/hobodave)
16:31.10hobodaveCould someone link me the "how to debug SIP" page? Can't find it with my google-fu
16:31.44WIMPysip set debug ...
16:31.55fulcansame 'unknown' without error but call disconnects as soon as it hits asterisk?    http://pastebin.com/FwpbQ2kC
16:32.23hobodavethere is a wiki page that someone here previously linked me
16:34.52hobodaveWIMPy: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Collecting+Debug+Information for future reference
16:37.29*** join/#asterisk KavanS (~KavanS@LINBIT/KavanS)
16:37.33*** join/#asterisk cneb3000-laptop (~cneb30000@02da1dc1.bb.sky.com)
16:40.06*** join/#asterisk moos3 (~rgenthner@cpe-74-75-157-202.maine.res.rr.com)
16:40.36moos3is there a way to call func_odbc GET statments from the console to debug them
16:42.21*** join/#asterisk irroot (~irroot@197.168.96.141)
16:45.10*** join/#asterisk drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano)
16:46.11*** join/#asterisk m_tadeu (~quassel@89.181.83.71)
16:46.41*** join/#asterisk awclin_ (~alinford@80.169.133.251)
16:48.33leifmadsenmoos3: you can only debug it from the server side, not the asterisk side
16:48.53leifmadsenenable SQL statement logging and look to see what is requested by asterisk and what the server returns
16:48.56moos3k
16:49.04leifmadsenODBC kind of hides all the debugging stuff from you
16:49.11moos3oh
16:49.26leifmadsenso that's why I always debug from the server side
16:49.31leifmadsenSQL server side*
16:52.49*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
16:56.21*** join/#asterisk m_tadeu (~quassel@89.181.7.187)
16:58.28fulcanSame 'unknown' without error but call disconnects as soon as it hits asterisk?    http://pastebin.com/DMv2hZKm
17:02.03*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-053179.ics.uci.edu)
17:02.46*** join/#asterisk pushpop (~pushpop@pool-173-77-230-33.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
17:04.42*** join/#asterisk Deeewayne (~dwayne@68-64-220-110.static.forethought.net)
17:04.42*** mode/#asterisk [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ
17:06.38*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
17:10.37*** join/#asterisk moy (~moy@CPE002719f00364-CM0026f3a1701d.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
17:12.04*** join/#asterisk celord (~celord@200.91.75.115)
17:14.00*** part/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
17:14.19*** join/#asterisk PoWeRKiLL (~powerkill@bzq-79-177-30-92.red.bezeqint.net)
17:14.34*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
17:14.46fulcanyet I can make a call just fine???  mv dialscript-do /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/  works like a champ but the forward does not????
17:16.01*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
17:21.05*** join/#asterisk grEvenX (~even@cC0FD00C3.dhcp.bluecom.no)
17:21.30Kattyhai
17:25.28*** join/#asterisk pdtpatrick_ (~pdtpatric@mainstwan.farheap.com)
17:26.37irroothi there K
17:27.03irroottonight you can fix MWI indication
17:28.42*** join/#asterisk leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
17:28.42*** mode/#asterisk [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
17:29.09irrootleifmadsen the MWI problem im having is not the same
17:35.54*** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~nate@24.143.28.16)
17:36.06*** join/#asterisk irroot (~irroot@197.106.191.224)
17:38.49leifmadsenirroot: oh no? ouch
17:40.10irrootyeah but i think i sorted it svn says blame russel
17:43.41*** join/#asterisk citywok (~citywok@67-134-194-33.dia.static.qwest.net)
17:51.11leifmadsenoh snap
17:52.50Kattywaves at leifmadsen
17:52.58leifmadseno/
17:53.38sezuanIs anyone aware of a skype-xmpp-transport using Asterisk For Skype?
17:56.24irrootleifmadsen new jira or post fix on the same issue ??
17:56.29Kattydoes anyone make their own pasta?
17:56.49irroothehe Katty guess that is no dont eat pasta ...
17:57.35irrootok new jira
17:57.36*** join/#asterisk fofware (~fabian@wdctf.siup.gov.ar)
17:58.12Kattywhy not?
17:58.16Kattywhat do you eat?
17:58.23leifmadsenirroot: ummm.... probably need a new issue, but it should be linked because they both need to get fixed
17:58.23fulcan[general]
17:58.24fulcanstatic=yes
17:58.24fulcanwriteprotect=no
17:58.24fulcanautofallthrough=yes
17:58.24fulcan[globals]
17:58.24fulcan[default]
17:58.24fulcanexten => 7185696288,1,Answer
17:58.25fulcanexten => 7185696288,2,Goto(7185696288,7185696288,1)
17:58.25fulcan[7185696288]
17:58.25linuxgeckoanyone here know how to make the configure for iksemel happy enough that it will compile in gnutls support?   it's not liking the gnutls i have installed..  i've tried distro package, and i've tried self-compiled gnutls.  nothing yet makes it happy.
17:58.26fulcan;exten => _[*#0-9].,1,MixMonitor(${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%F%T)}-${CALLERID(num)}-${EXTE$
17:58.26fulcanexten => 7185696288,1,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=5)      ; Set Digit Timeout to 5 secon$
17:58.27fulcanexten => 7185696288,2,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=10)  ; Set Response Timeout to 10 s$
17:58.27fulcan;exten => 7185696288,1,Set(CFIM=7185696288)
17:58.28fulcan;exten => 7185696288-CFIM,2,Dial(SIP/7185696288/7185696288,30,Ttr)
17:58.33Kattyi'm curious to know what people in affrica eat. do you eat giraffe steaks?
17:58.35linuxgeckofulcan: !!!!!!!
17:58.42linuxgeckofulcan:  USE A PASTEBIN
17:58.47fulcansorry.
17:58.49linuxgeckosorry for the caps
17:58.49Kattyi'll use your pastebin in a minute
17:59.02fulcanI thought I was pasting a url, mistake.
17:59.09WIMPyhands linuxgecko some autoignore
17:59.36linuxgeckoWIMPy:  ??
18:00.13WIMPyDoesn't your client have flood protection?
18:00.30p3nguinuses katty's pastebin.
18:00.54Qwellp3nguin: woah, woah, woah, bounries
18:00.54WIMPypastabin?
18:00.57Qwellboundries*
18:01.06linuxgeckoWIMPy: it might,   but channel rules/bots have normally been sufficient for me.   not sure if it's turned on in my client.
18:01.22*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@41.242.10.219)
18:01.22*** join/#asterisk emsLinux (~emsLinux@190.251.101.201)
18:01.33fulcanMixmonitor break my rtp stream for some reason. Without it, everything works fine but when I implement it, the call breaks @ forward  ->  http://pastebin.com/TZrN0ie2
18:02.04KattyQwell: what did you have for dinner last night
18:02.20QwellKatty: umm
18:02.24emsLinuxHello again, i got a noob question, Asterisk is storing the voicemails messages as root instead as asterisk user, is there a problem with this? is there any way i can change it?
18:02.27Qwellsteak and cheese hot pockets.
18:02.31Qwellyeah, I eat well.
18:02.35irrootleifmadsen this goes back to 1.6 from what i can see odd that there not complaints
18:02.36Kattygoodness.
18:02.49Kattyirroot: what did you have for dinner?
18:02.50QwellKatty: You just have to come cook for me.
18:02.52leifmadsenirroot: o.O
18:02.55KattyQwell: i think this is a trend amongst usa
18:03.00Kattyleifmadsen: what did you have for dinner?
18:03.19leifmadsenI haven't eaten dinner yet
18:03.22leifmadsenit's only 2pm
18:03.22Qwellleifmadsen has someone to cook for him
18:03.29leifmadsenactually I usually cook :)
18:03.34Qwellshut your face
18:03.37Kattyleifmadsen: dinner last night
18:03.41leifmadsenlast night I bbq'd steak, potatoes and veggies
18:03.55leifmadsenalso had break with balsamic vinegar and oil
18:04.00leifmadsens/break/bread/
18:04.33p3nguinemslinux: Yes, there's a problem with it.  The problem is that you are running asterisk as root.
18:04.44Kattyleifmadsen: that sounds quite tasty, and lacking in sugar. which is good.
18:04.45irrootKatty we eat food :P tonight its tuna salad .... mmm there is no real "african" food but if you find your self here ask for "pap 'n vlies"
18:04.56leifmadsenKatty: tonight we are having pulled pork though
18:04.57Kattyirroot: tuna salad?
18:05.02Kattyleifmadsen: in bbq sauce?
18:05.07leifmadsenKatty: yep
18:05.12Kattyleifmadsen: homemade, or bottled?
18:05.19leifmadsenbottled; dianas
18:05.30Kattynot familiar with that brand. why that brand?
18:05.58leifmadsenbecause it's delicious
18:06.13leifmadsenhttp://www.dianasauce.com/
18:06.27Kattyah, isee.
18:06.31Kattylooks
18:06.56leifmadsenruns off for a snack
18:07.36Kattywell i've seen worse ingredient lists
18:08.05fulcancan anyone tell me why mixmonitor would break a call?
18:08.16leifmadsendefine "break"
18:09.15fulcanwithout the line, everything works, implement it and the call breaks at the forward.
18:09.34leifmadsendefine "break"
18:09.39fulcanexten => _[*#0-9].,1,MixMonitor(${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%F%T)}-${CALLERID(num)}-${EXTEN$   is what breaks the call
18:09.49leifmadsenwell that most certainly looks wrong
18:09.59leifmadsenlook at the end of the line
18:10.11leifmadsenyou certainly can't end with a $
18:10.14fulcanbreak = no longer connected = no working = broken
18:10.36fulcanexten => _[*#0-9].,1,MixMonitor(${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%F%T)}-${CALLERID(num)}-${EXTEN}.WAV,a);
18:11.03fulcanputty ate the end of it. there is the full line.
18:11.05leifmadsenwhere is the console output? can you better define the sequence of events and what is happening at each spot?
18:11.18jkroonwhen using fxotune, -n gives a number to dial, dialstr, is it possible to put "pauses" into it?  What I want to do is dial a number, wait about 10 seconds then send a single DTMF digit ... ?
18:11.36leifmadsenjkroon: try "w"
18:11.41leifmadsenthat's what Dial() uses
18:11.47leifmadsenw == 500ms wait
18:12.14jkroonfxotune invokes the ioctl directly passing the given string, so unless the w is dealth with by the kernel I don't think that will work ?
18:14.54leifmadsenI dont' think there is anything you can do then
18:14.59leifmadsenunless a comma works
18:15.14jkroonwill just check ...
18:15.15leifmadsen(used to be used by modem dialing software back in the day)
18:15.47jkrooni also recall something about a , way back (* 1.2) causing a wait.
18:16.18irrootif i come to astricon it looks possible i must hook up a bottle of dorringdraad [barbed wire] mampoer [moonshine] for you guys
18:16.37jkroonja irroot :p
18:16.42*** join/#asterisk Intel`` (~DND@92.96.215.129)
18:17.18Intel``hi guys. i wanted to know if i can disable call forward on one extension via the cli?
18:18.13leifmadsenhow is the call forward being triggered in the first place?
18:18.23Intel``via *72
18:18.45irrootjkroon did it as "straaf drink" on fridays
18:18.47leifmadsenis that a dialplan match or features.conf match?
18:19.34leifmadsenor are you passing that through to the phone company
18:19.44WIMPyOr is it done in the phone?
18:19.53leifmadsenso many questions, so few answers :)
18:20.00Intel``ohh hmm im using asterisknow so this means freepbx did the feature codes
18:20.11jkroonleifmadsen, looks like w is implemented in chan_dahdi.c
18:20.15jkroonwill try the ,
18:20.35Intel``hm i will just login to that phone
18:20.41Intel``i have the passwords anyway :D
18:21.11jkroonIntel``, sounds like a GS phone?  *72 implemented locally on the phone.
18:21.40*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~ewieling@206.sub-75-202-72.myvzw.com)
18:21.50jkrooneither bounce the phone remotely or switch it off from the phone itself, no cli shortcut i'm afraid.
18:22.05*** part/#asterisk ManxPower (~ewieling@206.sub-75-202-72.myvzw.com)
18:23.33*** join/#asterisk n0tk (~n0tk@gateway/tor-sasl/n0tk)
18:23.48Kattyweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
18:24.05Kattybeek: enough tea has been consumed to properly de-fuzzify
18:24.42irrootwho killed captain pants
18:24.51jkroonleifmadsen, the , works thanks :)
18:26.42emsLinuxQuestion: I have the voicemail.conf with the emailbody in spanish, but i cant make the date appears in spanish too, theres any way to do this, i show a little example...  "por parte de "David Gomez" <****>, el Tuesday, June 14, 2011 at 02:22:05 PM, asi que"
18:28.42emsLinuxAlso, the asterisk server is sending 2 email messages, one as Asterisk PBX and the other one as i setted up, dunno what to do
18:30.02leifmadsenjkroon: np was just a guess ;)
18:35.04jkroonleifmadsen, acutally your initial guess was right, it's a W though :)
18:35.16jkroonjust checked dahdi-base.c from dahdi-linux
18:35.20leifmadsenheh
18:38.17PoWeRKiLLHi
18:38.53PoWeRKiLLDo you think that recompiling the kernel with  1000hz make a diferrence
18:38.53PoWeRKiLL?
18:39.40tzangerhmm
18:39.49tzangeranyone from Milan or local to Milan?
18:42.53*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@corp.fuzecore.com)
18:46.29*** join/#asterisk CaptainPants (~CaptainPa@nat/digium/x-efuwrrjnupypprws)
18:46.39*** join/#asterisk CaptainPants (~CaptainPa@nat/digium/x-uktnxvldfwuouuea)
18:49.02jkroonPoWeRKiLL, no, not in my experience.
18:49.10jkroonmost of my systems run with NOHZ
18:50.04*** join/#asterisk CaptainPants (~CaptainPa@nat/digium/x-ihuiaicfkqyhsvgu)
18:51.08*** join/#asterisk CaptainPants (~CaptainPa@nat/digium/x-hfmbrlnoizumwtpg)
18:52.22*** join/#asterisk CaptainPants (~CaptainPa@nat/digium/x-ajltuahecesyxhgx)
18:52.48beekKatty:  That's good to know.  So you're now ready to get to work?  :D
18:55.51*** join/#asterisk jaytee (~jforde051@unaffiliated/jaytee)
19:06.54fulcaneverything worked perfect till I added my second line and now I am getting the same error as earlier, 'rejected because extension not in context 'default'. I put it there statically for a reason. What am I missing?    http://pastebin.com/PMGP69zc
19:09.51*** join/#asterisk Naikrovek (~jjohnson@unaffiliated/naikrovek)
19:12.02jayteefulcan, your priorities in the default context are messed up. each unique extension entry has to start with 1 and either increment or be set to "n" for next.
19:12.27jayteechange the 4 to a 1, save, do a dialplan reload and test again.
19:13.20fulcanjaytee perfect!!!  TY!
19:13.28jayteeYW!
19:13.28fulcanDONE!!!!!   :)
19:13.42jayteeand you might want to browse the book
19:13.46jaytee~thebook
19:13.47infobotAsterisk: The Definitive Guide, 3rd Edition (ISBN 0-596-51734-3) available at http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596517342. Asterisk: The Definitive Guide is released under a Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) and is available for reading online at http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/, or ~buybook
19:14.19*** join/#asterisk digilink (~digilink@unaffiliated/digilink)
19:14.34fulcana flawless yet simple voice recording server that has clear as a bell audio even though the call basically circles the globe. You can't even tell.   :)
19:14.44jayteeit's available online to read or you can buy it from Amazon or O'Reilly. well worth the cash for people learning asterisk.
19:14.53jayteehas tons of good stuff about security in it too.
19:15.02*** join/#asterisk digilink (~digilink@unaffiliated/digilink)
19:15.06Naikrovekyeah
19:15.08Naikrovekgood book
19:15.50*** join/#asterisk FlaPer87 (~FlaPer87@unaffiliated/flaper87)
19:16.20fulcanI don't mind reading it when I am not under pressure for the simple stuff. I read the book years ago but discovered how horribly rusty I am.  Cheers my friends. This is a 'mission accomplish'!
19:19.28*** join/#asterisk digilink (~digilink@unaffiliated/digilink)
19:20.22jayteefulcan, cool! you'll find there's lots of great new features in * 1.6 and especially 1.8.x
19:26.04*** join/#asterisk anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br)
19:45.07*** join/#asterisk michael-i (~anonymous@204.11.230.58.static.etheric.net)
19:53.09*** join/#asterisk jaskew (~jdaskew@netblock-75-79-182-110.dslextreme.com)
19:58.28*** join/#asterisk n0tk (~n0tk@gateway/tor-sasl/n0tk)
19:58.39*** join/#asterisk quidpro (~quid246@CPE00131078b0b5-CM000f9f7eff1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
19:58.55*** join/#asterisk PoWeRKiLL (~powerkill@bzq-79-177-30-92.red.bezeqint.net)
19:59.51*** join/#asterisk autofsckk (~autofsckk@unaffiliated/autofsckk)
20:01.54quidproThis has been a long standing "bug" of mine... but is there a way to encrypt IAX2 secret in the iax.conf?
20:02.29Qwellquidpro: No, because anything that has access to it, can just decrypt it.
20:03.15quidproQwell:  True.  I thought it was possible to md5secret in sip.conf thought?
20:03.26*** join/#asterisk Naikrovek (~jjohnson@unaffiliated/naikrovek)
20:03.29QwellThat isn't anywhere near the same thing.
20:04.06*** join/#asterisk qr42 (~qr42@ip68-4-151-50.oc.oc.cox.net)
20:04.14*** join/#asterisk Rufus (Rufus@unaffiliated/rufus)
20:04.50quidproPity... I hate having things in plaintext.
20:04.59quidproOne more reason not to use IAX2 I guess.
20:05.14Qwellneither would help anything even remotely
20:05.32QwellIf you don't trust people, don't give them access to your box.
20:05.47Kattybeek: something like that.
20:05.51Kattyprods Qwell
20:05.58quidproI know... but you can't always predict security holes.
20:06.25Qwellquidpro: You're missing the point.  Anything that can read any method we add, is necessarily able to decrypt it.
20:08.17quidproQwell, no I get the point.  But I am saying someone gets access to your RealTime MySQL DB.... IAX2 secret is there for the reading.  While on the SIP side, I use OpenSIPS and it stores the passwords hashed ha1, ha1b
20:08.57QwellThat's great, but OpenSIPS is, as the name implies, Open Source.
20:09.08Qwell*anything* can decrypt any method that it uses.
20:09.35QwellIt provides nothing more than a(n extremely false) sense of security.
20:09.58*** join/#asterisk n0tk (~n0tk@gateway/tor-sasl/n0tk)
20:10.09quidproOf course, if you dig deep enough anything is crackable.
20:10.16QwellNo
20:10.26QwellWe aren't talking about digging.  We're talking about reading the code that decrypts it.
20:10.36Qwellhttp://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/PlainTextPasswords
20:10.42QwellRead that, it explains the problem pretty well.
20:11.36quidproI just glanced over it and yes it does have a point.  But Linux is open source too... yet passwords aren't stored in plaintext (AFAIK).
20:11.59QwellBecause login doesn't send your password anywhere.
20:12.13QwellIt reads what you gave it, and matches the hash against /etc/passwd - that is *very* different.
20:12.22*** part/#asterisk moos3 (~rgenthner@cpe-74-75-157-202.maine.res.rr.com)
20:13.35QwellAsterisk necessarily needs the password, so that it can send it to the other side.
20:15.24*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202)
20:17.24quidproI guess that is more true of an outbound context... but I am talking about inbound only.  I have no clue how IAX2 authentication works, but surely there could be a way to store PWs by precomputing the possible hashes.
20:18.04jayteea one-way hash can't be reversed. it's like cranking the meat grinder backwards trying to make steak out of hamburger
20:18.51michael-i...but since you send the hamburger...and the other side expects hamburger...everyone's happy and "you're in" (laptop spin)
20:20.06quidproThat's why I like SIP... not to mention much easier to LB.
20:20.35Qwellmichael-i: okay, great, so you're storing exactly what the other side needs
20:20.47leifmadsenit's probably nearly trivial to add md5secret to chan_iax2 by looking at the chan_sip implementation
20:20.52QwellOH NO, they don't have the plaintext password.  Fine, just send the hash, which is also in the file.
20:20.59leifmadsen:)
20:21.56quidproIsn't that the purpose of NONCE... to prevent replay attacks?
20:22.07QwellYou're *storing* the hash.
20:22.10michael-iQwell: exactly...apply the same f() to both sides...doesn't matter. Whatever is stored is what you send. Only way around the whole dilemma is to use a different auth machanism
20:22.18QwellThe hash which is now, in the scenario just described, required by the protocol.
20:22.42michael-imachanism? e-gads, gotta slow down
20:22.48*** join/#asterisk Scorpio2007 (~Scorpio20@jose-tc.ctc.biz)
20:24.03*** part/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137-237-233-124.harris.com)
20:24.04Qwellquidpro: If you want to live with your false sense of security, great, use SIP.
20:27.48*** join/#asterisk cmendes0101 (~nn@pool-173-51-199-161.lsanca.fios.verizon.net)
20:28.13*** join/#asterisk pc-m (~pascal@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca)
20:28.16*** join/#asterisk gandhijee (akp@ip67-152-15-148.z15-152-67.customer.algx.net)
20:28.25*** join/#asterisk theorem (~Theorem@rrcs-24-103-43-99.nyc.biz.rr.com)
20:28.31jayteeI've been living with a true sense of insecurity for decades.....but then everyone else calls it paranoia
20:28.52Qwelljaytee: Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
20:29.22theoremcurious -- I'm trying to dig out the SIP details from my MagicJack device.  anyone done this before or have a recommended client to use -- credentials I've snagged don;t seem to authenticate me. :-/
20:29.41QwellYou don't.
20:30.50theoremQwell: I will do a bit more poking about then.
20:35.16theoremQwell: hmm, you seem to be right .. SIP support on MagicJack is dead since the password revolves now every 5 mins.  I did have an inkling that the the https session was doing some funny business.
20:35.33Qwellof course I'm right
20:35.43leifmadsentheorem: I've gone through it all -- you can't do that anymore
20:35.53leifmadsenas you've just figured out
20:36.13theoremleifmadsen: anything of comparable quality/price ?
20:36.19leifmadsenuse a real ISP
20:36.21leifmadsenITSP
20:36.30leifmadsenmost are around 1c/min
20:36.32*** join/#asterisk golikwid|mac (~chrislees@207.30.30.130)
20:36.46leifmadsensometimes you can get a free DID from somewhere like Indiana or Wisconsin
20:37.57theoremso, 2000 minutes per year to be comparable with MagicJack ... I do chew through about 60min per day.
20:38.12QwellYou aren't comparing like things.
20:38.15leifmadsenaye
20:38.39theoremQwell: true, a real SIP device is much more flexible.
20:41.02*** join/#asterisk hetii (~hetii@87.99.51.172)
20:41.03theoremand I assume something like a SIP softphone on a smartphone would be an amazing benefit.
20:41.06hetiiHello :)
20:41.08hetiiis it possible provide somehow in faxmail modem with one should be used by hylafax?
20:42.09*** join/#asterisk jc319 (~jc318@78.86.169.203)
20:42.38quidproFirst was MagicJack... now what's the new one like Qaboo or something.
20:42.55leifmadsenno idea, I just use a real ITSP and be done with it
20:46.45*** join/#asterisk Quintana (~sylvain@aghnar.doowan.net)
20:50.22*** join/#asterisk WiretapWork (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
20:50.49theoremoh, and I have a GoogleVoice account -- anyone want an invite ?
20:51.07Qwellsince when is it still invite only?
20:51.56theoremdunno, I have invites.
20:51.57*** join/#asterisk Z_God (~julius@2001:610:1908:8000:21e:ecff:fe5d:679e)
20:54.24quidproI thought anybody (US Only) could get GV now?
20:55.15quidproI still have GMail invites... so probably "old code" laying around
20:55.17jc319how come US only?
20:55.42Qwellbecause it costs a hell of a lot of money to not be US only?
20:55.52quidproJC:  Probably to CYA in other jurisdictions (ie. UAE)
20:56.06theoremquidpro: actually it's still rather clever -- it give the "feel" of a "special" system, while still being quite available to anyone.  free advertising.
20:56.33quidprotheorem:  Just the red velvet rope in front of a club.
20:56.40theoremquidpro: right
20:57.32*** join/#asterisk kamikazemicrowav (~kamikazem@seraph.contegix.com)
20:57.34theoremquidpro: however, I have a bit of a problem with the red velvet rope .. invite systems are a notably better served.
20:58.51quidproTheorem:  I agree.
20:58.59jc319to call US-only, a-ha. I thought 'sign-up form' is for US subscribers only which is not easy to detect based on IPs only, so I was wondering if they check ID or something to sign up!
20:59.57Qwellcountry isn't easy to detect, based on IP?
20:59.58theoremjc319: not really ... I assume it's done based on the forwarding number(s)
21:00.17theoremQwell: no, geo locatable IPs are relatively easy to fake.
21:00.20QwellThere are companies that exist for that sole reason.  We're talking about Google here.  They know.
21:00.48Kattythrows marshmallows at Qwell
21:01.09WIMPyI've been told, you only need to use an US proxy to sign up. Frrom then on you can use it worldwide.
21:03.38jc319Google Voice is not available in your country. Thanks for visiting Google Voice. We're not yet open for users outside the US, but are planning to expand our service to additional countries in the future.
21:04.03jc319country is easy to detect based on IP databases. However you cannot detect if the IP you just detected is the real one (proxy n stuff)
21:11.32Qwellsighs at Katty
21:13.01Katty:<
21:13.06Kattyhugs Qwell
21:14.11*** part/#asterisk quidpro (~quid246@CPE00131078b0b5-CM000f9f7eff1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
21:17.56michael-iIs the only way to share a variable between caller and callee, astdb?
21:20.00leifmadsenmichael-i: Set(__InheritedChannelVariable=value)
21:21.50michael-ileifmadsen: I tried that. Incrementing the variable with an applicationmap macro() from caller and callee kept independent values.
21:22.03leifmadsenyes they are separate channels
21:22.25leifmadsencore show function SHARED()
21:23.05michael-ibows deeply
21:23.18Kattytwitches
21:23.25michael-ileifmadsen: you should write books on this stuff!
21:23.30Kattyresists...
21:23.34michael-i...
21:24.14Qwellmichael-i: nah, they'd be terrible
21:24.25Qwell>.>
21:24.26Qwell<.<
21:24.27leifmadsenQwell: +1
21:24.49leifmadsenwriting documentation is overrated
21:24.59Qwells/writ/read/
21:25.58pabelangerclones leifmadsen
21:26.27Kattyclones leifmadsen's clone.
21:28.35leifmadsenwe're going down the rabbit hole people
21:28.39tzangerKatty: don't do that, the original's already retarded enough
21:29.30tzangerI'm going to have to get to Toronto to have a few beers with him sometime soon though or I'll lose my ability to call him names in a friendly manner
21:32.42leifmadsentzanger: indeed
21:32.46leifmadsenyou've already lost your free beers
21:32.47Kattygiggles
21:32.54tzangeryikes
21:32.58tzangerspeaking of yikes
21:33.02tzangerI bought some Brava yesterday
21:33.05leifmadsenNICE!
21:33.06tzangerI will not make that mistake again
21:33.11leifmadsenOh :)
21:33.13leifmadsenI like brava
21:33.19tzangerthat stuff is the Coors Light of Labbatt
21:33.22leifmadsennot as much as guinness or other beers, but ya
21:33.33leifmadsenRickards Red is also delicious
21:33.38tzangersticks to Tuborg, Dab and such
21:33.42Kattythis must be Male Beer Talk
21:33.44tzangeryes Rickard's is good, I also like Waterloo Dark
21:33.47Kattyi'm not comprehending anything
21:33.53tzangerguinness is okay, I'm not a huge fan of stouts
21:33.59leifmadsenI also like Steamwhistle
21:34.02tzangerKatty: you should watch and learn, this is important stuff
21:34.15leifmadsenI can drink guinness all night without getting full of carbonation
21:34.20tzangeractually you've shattered a stereotype I've held
21:34.27Kattyguiness is icky
21:34.33leifmadsenyou're icky!
21:34.36Kattythe after after taste is ok tho
21:34.37leifmadsenjoke
21:34.37tzangerI thought rollerderbiers were beer drinkers
21:34.39leifmadsens
21:34.40Kattykind of like..chocolatey
21:34.52leifmadsenit's more coffee than chocolate ;)
21:35.17Kattythe after taste is coffee
21:35.22Kattythe after after taste is chocolatey
21:35.32tzangerI don't like much aftertaste, but I'm a big fan of hoppy beer
21:36.47leifmadsenis in expense filing mode.... it's not a fun mode
21:36.54Kattybleh, hoppy beer is often bitter
21:36.58tzangerleifmadsen: eww.
21:37.15leifmadsenwent to an on-site deployment last week so now I have to do all the expense filing
21:37.37tzangerKatty: I think that's why I tend to like it. something that cuts through the slobber and stuff in my mouth and doesn't leave me parched and wanting another drink
21:37.51Kattyah :<
21:38.21tzangerwater just kind of bounces off my gums/etc. coke cuts it too but it's so sugary I'm thirsty after drinking it
21:40.03leifmadsenQwell: YOU'RE GOING TO ASTRICON!!!!!!!!!!
21:40.15Qwelllies
21:40.21leifmadsenya, you're right
21:40.24leifmadsenthere is still time :)
21:40.34Qwellwhat did I miss?
21:40.39KattyQwell is busy that weekend
21:40.43Kattywe're going to go to uhhh
21:40.44QwellKatty: oh?
21:40.46Kattynudges Qwell
21:40.49Kattyhelp me out here
21:40.54QwellOh, right, that "thing".  With "you"
21:41.05Kattyyes yes,.... we're going to uhh YEMEN
21:41.06tzangerPIXIECON!
21:41.14KattyYES
21:41.17Kattypixiecon in yemen
21:41.27Qwellleifmadsen: have they started sending out the talk approval thingies or something?
21:41.35*** join/#asterisk angryuser_laptop (~angryuser@90-156-167-83.reverse.alphalink.fr)
21:41.44leifmadsenQwell: not sure, apparently the schedule is up though
21:41.49Qwelloh?
21:42.13leifmadsenhttp://www.astricon.net/conferenceProgram.aspx
21:43.02QwellI am on there
21:43.17Qwellhuh
21:43.41Kattyi put you on it
21:43.47Qwellsweet, I'm competing with Kerry, Rod, and pabelanger
21:44.02Qwellpabelanger: attendance winner buys the first round that night! :P
21:44.39pabelangerQwell: :)
21:44.41Kattywow, i recognize half the names on there
21:44.42Qwellwoah woah woah, I'm on there twice.
21:44.44Qwellthat's not my talk
21:44.45Kattymaybe i /should/ go
21:46.17QwellKatty: of course you should go
21:46.48Qwellwe can "go to Yemen" another time
21:48.37linuxgeckoyay!!!!    /me needs to RTFM a bit more carefully the first few hundred times , next time.
21:48.49p3nguinnods
21:50.04linuxgeckothe solution was int eh iksemel link i pasted when i first found the solution to iksemel with gnutls.   but i didn't read that they had a solution to version mismatch also.
21:53.13*** join/#asterisk fhmiv (~fhmiv@adsl-065-005-242-247.sip.ags.bellsouth.net)
21:57.13linuxgeckoarrgh..   compiling it with gnutls doesn't seem to have helped :-(
21:58.12linuxgeckohow do i know that the iksemel is working, and it's not me?
21:59.50Kattyyou're a GECKO
21:59.55Kattywhat is a gecko doing compiling things
22:00.02Kattyshouldn't you be sitting on rocks
22:00.06Kattyand changing colors and such
22:00.39WiretapWorkKatty, that would be a Karma Chamaeleon
22:01.27linuxgeckohehe
22:01.59Kattyoh :>
22:02.03Kattyk'then! carry on!
22:34.25*** join/#asterisk brainiac (~mhauss@c-68-52-249-113.hsd1.tn.comcast.net)
22:35.16brainiacDoes anyone know why Asterisk (1.4.31) would stop reporting?
22:37.21beekYou're a bit light on details so I doubt that you'll get much of a reply.
22:37.50WiretapWork~ask
22:37.50infobotQuestions in the channel should be specific, informative, complete, concise, and on-topic.  Don't ask if you can ask a question first.  Don't ask if a person is there; just ask what you intended to ask them.  Better questions more frequently yield better answers.  We are all here voluntarily or against our will.
22:40.15*** part/#asterisk hetii (~hetii@87.99.51.172)
22:44.01*** join/#asterisk so| (~studyofli@static-50-43-92-34.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net)
22:47.25brainiacI have an Asterisk 1.4.31 at a very busy site.  It records calls with the reports.  The customer went to run reports on the system and there was nothing after 9:25A.  Asterisk stopped reporting and it seems there is no way to recover the missing reports or recordings.
22:48.55brainiacIt seems the only way to prevent this is to restart Asterisk.  This system is running a single 24 channel sip trunk.  Any ideas about what could have caused this?
22:54.26michael-ileifmadsen: got my recording macro + cdr magic figured out (applicationmap + macro + master_channel + h extension + func_cdr) thanks for the pointers!
23:02.57linuxgeckobrainiac:  am i assuming too much to think that you have checked disk space?
23:04.15*** join/#asterisk Dovid (~Dovid@213.8.121.90)
23:04.24Dovidanyone from Digium here ?
23:20.24jc319p3nguin PING?
23:21.54linuxgeckoDovid: something digium-specific??(  I'm not from Digium)
23:22.07WiretapWorkDovid...
23:22.08WiretapWork~ask
23:22.08infobotQuestions in the channel should be specific, informative, complete, concise, and on-topic.  Don't ask if you can ask a question first.  Don't ask if a person is there; just ask what you intended to ask them.  Better questions more frequently yield better answers.  We are all here voluntarily or against our will.
23:23.18linuxgeckoWiretapWork:  i love the final xor in that bot response :)
23:23.30WiretapWorkXD
23:25.26Dovidsorry. back
23:25.57Dovidi have an issue with Digium Fax Driver. Trying to put in a support ticket but the site keeps asking me to log in -> chose a site. I am logged in and then it re-eats
23:26.20*** join/#asterisk WiretapWork_ (~Wiretap@unaffiliated/wiretap)
23:28.19jc319I'm aware Lync (new version of Microsoft OCS) and Asterisk are not exactly identical solutions but I was just wondering if there is a similar solution in 'Asterisk world' to this 'Call Admission Control' feature of Lync? ( http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/ff731056.aspx )
23:40.01*** join/#asterisk Cesare (~Adium@creati59.lnk.telstra.net)
23:44.36*** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave)
23:45.39kaldemarjc319: sure. for example with group functions in the dialplan.
23:48.02linuxgecko\
23:52.11*** join/#asterisk Eitan (~Eitan@adsl-99-22-192-148.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.