| 00:13.03 | hojuruku | [TK]D-Fender: I wrote an email about your so called "faggot" openwrt vs the real faggot #lede-dev :P https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2016-July/041930.html I know you'll like it. |
| 00:14.12 | hojuruku | #vuc is where the queer action is at. I recorded their after show talking about wife sharing cuck stuff when they thought they were all alone on the conference. Vuc.me - no thanks. No wonder #freeswitch forked their own vuc replacement - or "afterparty" |
| 00:15.15 | [TK]D-Fender | TL;DR |
| 00:16.40 | drmessano | [TK]D-Fender: You started a movement, apparently |
| 00:16.49 | *** join/#asterisk babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hsgacepsbfqakkvp) |
| 00:16.50 | drmessano | [TK]D-Fender: nothing some Pepto won't cure |
| 00:17.28 | *** join/#asterisk piling (~piling@unaffiliated/piling) |
| 00:18.06 | hojuruku | haha |
| 00:18.49 | hojuruku | now when's my second tear support for #siproxd going to answer the question. Seeing #siproxd doesn't work with most VSPs it's mostly only asterisk users using it :P |
| 00:19.05 | hojuruku | ^tear^tier |
| 00:19.44 | hojuruku | If I came on #asterisk and started poaching users to #freeswitch you'd hate my guts wouldn't you? that's lede-dev vs openwrt :p |
| 00:19.59 | [TK]D-Fender | <drmessano> [TK]D-Fender: You started a movement, apparently <- leads leave bowels out of this. |
| 00:20.50 | drmessano | Im sure siproxd has a vibrant user community |
| 00:21.07 | hojuruku | [TK]D-Fender: did you see that mailing list post pisstaking the queers in opensource development. The lead developer of #systemd is a real SOB and queer. Maybe the homophobic #gentoo are behind this: http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page |
| 00:21.11 | drmessano | and by that, I mean, they are all set on fire |
| 00:21.14 | [TK]D-Fender | With the right accelerant I'm sure that's possible... |
| 00:21.28 | [TK]D-Fender | drmessano, TIMING BRO |
| 00:21.32 | hojuruku | haha |
| 00:22.43 | hojuruku | also #sixxs saw a comment i made on IRC and took the whole hotel ipv6 tunnel i set up offline with 50 users and BGP with no notice. Your IRC comments can get your internet connection terminated. Guess who runs them too? do your research. He loves cats! |
| 00:22.55 | [TK]D-Fender | heads off to his show.... |
| 00:23.48 | drmessano | hojuruku: You should probably start a Whites-Only Anti-LGBTQ community for open source users. Build a huge fireWALL to keep everyone out. |
| 00:24.00 | b11d | omfg wkwkwkwk |
| 00:24.02 | b11d | lol |
| 00:24.13 | hojuruku | Then there is the biggest example, Brendan Eitch of Mozilla I mentioned in my email :P You can support #opensource without supporting http://accelerate.lgbt/about - oh that's the other name for #wordpress |
| 00:24.41 | file | blinks |
| 00:25.08 | drmessano | Maybe not-z.com is open? |
| 00:25.17 | drmessano | #justsayin |
| 00:26.34 | drmessano | file: No need to blink, I am pretty sure he's serious |
| 00:26.39 | *** join/#asterisk fstd_ (~fstd@unaffiliated/fisted) |
| 00:26.43 | Samot | Yup. |
| 00:27.08 | hojuruku | drmessano: the solution is the opposite, Rush Limbaugh proposed it already when I was in America in 2005 before a gay child fucking pedo cop Christopher Kent Bowersox (now convicted see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2jmU-Fp_M4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll_xtO2SFvc) attemped to murder me.. ah yes. Old Limb-auh said build a fence around San Fran Cisco. FENCE THEM IN. Now when California implodes they all run to Austin Texas... |
| 00:27.09 | hojuruku | Australia has already made a big gay firewall. If any australian blogs about anti-gay marriage blogs being blocked in Australia the fines are 60k per day. I'm serious. Even time magazine calls it the great firewall of Australia: http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1995615,00.html |
| 00:28.15 | drmessano | wonders when this became #TEDTalks |
| 00:28.21 | Samot | It's been awhile since we've had just a randomly crazy troll. |
| 00:28.36 | hojuruku | Sorry it's $11,000 dollars a day for complaining about internet censorship of anti-gay marriage sites. biggest newspaper in Australia confirms it: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/17/1237054787635.html |
| 00:28.45 | newtonr | hojuruku, lets keep the topic on Asterisk please. you are treading the line on our community code of conduct. |
| 00:28.53 | file | this is extremely off topic and venturing into code of conduct territory, please cease |
| 00:28.55 | hojuruku | sorry it's tech stuff. I thought you liked tech stuff about firewalls, you clowns brought it up :) |
| 00:28.59 | Samot | Just treading? |
| 00:29.04 | newtonr | hojuruku, https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Community+Code+of+Conduct |
| 00:29.17 | hojuruku | ban me I use #freeswitch see if i care :P |
| 00:29.33 | Samot | Of course. |
| 00:29.38 | Samot | It's always FreeSwitch users. |
| 00:29.41 | hojuruku | is that against the code of conduct to use another software switch? oh SIP express router isn't bad either. What's it called these days? |
| 00:29.49 | file | if you stop you won't be banned of course |
| 00:30.14 | hojuruku | If you self-censor free speech and comply with the asterisk overlordss. Man I have to delete 10 years of your mailing list in my gmail now... |
| 00:30.35 | hojuruku | I was using quicknet and h323 b4 asterisk :P |
| 00:30.49 | hojuruku | https://gigaom.com/2009/02/02/quicknet-what-might-have-been/ |
| 00:30.56 | file | okay? |
| 00:31.05 | hojuruku | yes gay lord. im done. |
| 00:31.39 | hojuruku | remember it was [TK]D-Fender who mentioned faggot here on the chat first. Will he be diciplined Did he break the code of conduct doing that? |
| 00:31.48 | hojuruku | Or are you bigots? |
| 00:32.06 | hojuruku | you log the channel or you want cut and paste from my scrollback buffer? |
| 00:32.30 | Samot | Hes Canadian. Theres a ratio to respect. |
| 00:32.37 | file | you don't need to cut and paste |
| 00:32.43 | file | 'nor have you been banned |
| 00:32.45 | Samot | You need at least one Canadian. |
| 00:33.01 | hojuruku | nope. Australian POLITICAL REFUGEE IN HK BEFORE SNOWDEN http://bit.ly/aurefugee2 aka http://twitter.com/VGB_OPSEC "homophobic" hacker :P |
| 00:33.04 | file | this warning applies to everyone |
| 00:33.19 | file | and serves as a reminder that we do have a code of conduct and to please respect it |
| 00:34.14 | hojuruku | but my dad is in Australia and they are after him too: here's his latest interview http://truthnews.com.au/web/radio/story/cultural_marxism_101 by they i mean @nodiscrim @NCATNSW @GarryBurnsblog @PIACNews @DavidShoebridgeMP and a few others. I had to say names instead of they, or i'd look like a tin foil hat wearer. Does truthnews sound genuine enough? |
| 00:34.25 | Samot | You probably need to ban drmessano. This is probably his fault. |
| 00:34.28 | hojuruku | ok now i'm done. |
| 00:34.34 | newtonr | yup, just tone it down and act like reasonable adults and we don't have to ban anyone. We rarely ban anyone here and we'd like to keep it that way. |
| 00:34.53 | drmessano | Samot: 9/11 was a conspiracy |
| 00:35.05 | drmessano | Samot: You mean like that? |
| 00:35.17 | hojuruku | I came in here asking for help with a SIP issue regarding does anyone know any proxy that can userspace proxy sip without adding an extra SIP VIA header and then [TK]D-Fender starts talking this and that about faggots. It's not me really. |
| 00:35.17 | Samot | Yup |
| 00:35.38 | file | hojuruku, stop. |
| 00:36.02 | Samot | We told you the answer. |
| 00:36.16 | hojuruku | what was that? rack off? oh yeah GOOGLE |
| 00:36.23 | drmessano | hojuruku: If you feel like someone has triggered you on IRC, your best bet is to walk away, take a few deep breaths, and realize this isn't real life. |
| 00:36.25 | hojuruku | I remember, scroll up. |
| 00:36.30 | Samot | You could remove the route records. Its your proxy |
| 00:36.59 | hojuruku | I'm not triggered I'm pulling the trigger, everyone is going STOP STOP STOP STOP.. I can't handle this oh no i'm..... what exactly? ah yes triggered to stop free speech. NOW PLEASE LET IT BE DONE |
| 00:37.04 | drmessano | hojuruku: You can also place the offending party on ignore |
| 00:37.08 | Samot | Proxy add route records |
| 00:37.25 | hojuruku | no he's not offending! I thanked him for using the word faggot first then I got in trouble. See the logs guys ^^^^^ |
| 00:37.51 | hojuruku | [TK]D-Fender: I love you man, even though you said I used a faggot openwrt linux distro that packages your beloved asterisk 11 and 13 |
| 00:37.52 | Samot | And hes ignoring the topic he asked about. |
| 00:38.14 | hojuruku | ok i'm done triggering you guys, out to by smokes thank god it's over. |
| 00:39.45 | Samot | Just remember they can pull you over driving your riding lawn mower drunk. |
| 00:40.24 | hojuruku | not in vietnam, i ride a 150cc lawnmower that only goes 100km p/h |
| 00:41.16 | Samot | Ahhh. This is the result of too much dog in your diet. |
| 00:41.51 | b11d | and too much China in your seas |
| 00:43.24 | drmessano | Samot: Thats a racial stereotype |
| 00:43.38 | Samot | 100 |
| 00:44.02 | drmessano | Samot: Most Open Sores Projects are Racists |
| 00:44.12 | drmessano | Samot: Like 9/11 |
| 00:46.36 | Samot | Rofl |
| 00:47.00 | drmessano | Im working on an Asterisk based telephony distro for Communist regimes |
| 00:47.06 | drmessano | I'm gonna call it RedBox |
| 00:47.11 | drmessano | What do you think? |
| 00:47.44 | Samot | Someone used that name |
| 00:48.03 | drmessano | This happens to me all the time |
| 00:48.21 | drmessano | I had this idea for a mobile clothing stain removal service |
| 00:48.25 | drmessano | But Spotify was taken |
| 00:51.27 | Samot | Your kind of luck |
| 00:52.18 | Samot | Did you have an idea for a mobile touch screen device that could play media and read documents? |
| 00:54.06 | Samot | If so you can sue Apple for 10bn |
| 00:59.44 | drmessano | Well no, sadly |
| 01:02.19 | drmessano | But I did have this other idea |
| 01:02.43 | drmessano | You know those copy holders you use when typing? |
| 01:03.08 | *** join/#asterisk TECFALL (~dschuett@ip68-13-31-237.om.om.cox.net) |
| 01:03.27 | drmessano | I made one out of clay, that looked like a circus performer.. |
| 01:03.35 | drmessano | I called it the Adobe Acrobat Reader |
| 01:03.41 | drmessano | and I got sued so hard |
| 01:06.11 | Samot | Haha |
| 01:06.27 | Samot | I wrote some code once... |
| 01:06.39 | Samot | Released it as SCO... |
| 01:06.44 | Samot | It didnt end well. |
| 01:08.12 | drmessano | Kinda like the guy that had a line of fishnets with patterns on them representing characters from famous books |
| 01:08.22 | drmessano | It called it Novel NetWare |
| 01:09.43 | Samot | Thats a good one |
| 01:09.47 | drmessano | I think it would be cool if American Standard came out with a toilet called the "Commode 64" |
| 01:10.40 | Samot | Only of little tanks shoot water at my dropping poop |
| 01:11.12 | drmessano | Oh god.. Towlie episode of SP |
| 01:11.13 | Samot | But there may ne cases were its centipede. |
| 01:11.43 | drmessano | "We dont care" |
| 01:11.48 | drmessano | "Dude, we dont care" |
| 01:16.37 | b11d | Just gotta get a little high... |
| 01:18.42 | drmessano | OH GOD HERE IT IS |
| 01:19.03 | *** join/#asterisk zway (~zway@cpe-71-76-159-67.triad.res.rr.com) |
| 01:19.15 | drmessano | Thats it |
| 01:19.21 | drmessano | Thats the melody to funkytown |
| 01:19.27 | drmessano | YESH!!!! |
| 01:20.38 | TECFALL | Is there a "Best Practice" for sip types between asterisk servers? friend vs peer? |
| 01:21.05 | drmessano | Yes, know what a Friend does.. if you don't need a Peer+User, then pick one |
| 01:21.18 | drmessano | Like, use peer |
| 01:28.51 | hojuruku | Samot: I think the next release of siproxd i think has a plugin that will do what i want.. i'll investigate. |
| 01:29.33 | hojuruku | Samot: you claim to have wrote sco? In the 90s I saw sco being used for telephony boxes at Equant formally knowing as sita.int now site.aero's private digital network division (the fast internet then) |
| 01:30.11 | hojuruku | Samot: Aren't Novell bastards :P I'm a Master CNE too :P MCSE since 98 NT 4.0. Like that means shit anyway with braindumps. Man I hate M$ |
| 01:30.51 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 01:31.12 | hojuruku | They are trying to offer me free tests to bring me back to their fold, why would anyone run M$ Hybrid-Kernel shit. I feel sorry for the M$ types who have to install linux using Windows PE scripting and SCCM aka SMS |
| 01:33.47 | hojuruku | But if it makes you feel better I hate apple more because the CEO... I wrote a post on how to use qemu + kvm. http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/OSXKVM/ Evil macs are just PCs now with a SMC chip and a queer copyrighted code word on that chip that works like a lame HSM (hardware security module) or dongle. People pay double for a secret queer code word installed in rom on their PC that is a crime to even publish. I did.... and |
| 01:33.47 | hojuruku | wordpress took my blog down the next day because they feared all those artistic types queers not paying the other queers and running MacOS for free at 99% speed (assuming they have the right graphics cards) on LVS that emulates their belovered SMC controller and the secret fag code word. |
| 01:37.30 | hojuruku | drmessano: The Scottish MacDonalds clan (which I evolve from along with the Northern Irish terorrist McKee Clan) were sued by McDonalds [tm][sm][etc] Hamburgers for dare naming their bar in one of their own castles after their own name they had for 100s of years. It may relate to payback for this in 97. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/talk.politics.animals/TcLav_7t-Hk |
| 01:42.39 | Samot | So telephony and stuff. |
| 01:45.53 | hojuruku | 7 OTs vs how many from you guys? wc -l it :P |
| 01:46.55 | hojuruku | Samot: You didn't really write santa cruz operation aka SCO Unixware :P did you? |
| 01:47.21 | hojuruku | I used to do field support for that now and then when it was in use in the 90's. Popular with a few accounting RDBMs. |
| 01:53.14 | hojuruku | drmessano: You are wrong. It's called redstar linux. They might be interested. I released the dirt on gayped Judge Kirby and North Korea attacked and it made world news. I went to their Embassy in Vietnam and dropped off a care packet in the month before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Star_OS http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-12/kim-jong-un-hates-this-judge-michael-kirby-on-the-dictators-future my comments bragging about |
| 01:53.15 | hojuruku | doing it, https://disqus.com/home/discussion/nknews/north_korea_arrests_24_year_old_american_citizen/ also here days after. I wish i blogged it before North Korea went public. http://www.nknews.org/2014/04/north-korea-arrests-24-year-old-american-citizen/ I'm kicking myself. I remember driving to the NK embeassy on my bike, deliberately with mud smeared over the numberplate. It was fun. |
| 01:53.51 | hojuruku | drmessano: I wonder if they communist redstar package asterisk too like you were talking about above ^^^ :) |
| 01:54.42 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 01:55.42 | drmessano | Wtf |
| 01:56.11 | drmessano | I'm not wrong about anything |
| 01:56.16 | drmessano | So please stop |
| 02:01.06 | Samot | I honestly thought he left. |
| 02:02.06 | drmessano | I think he's got some kind of drunk homophobia stinky cabbage fetish |
| 02:04.53 | Samot | It's not even interesting. |
| 02:05.39 | Samot | It's like watching a Dane Cook special. |
| 02:06.38 | drmessano | or David Blaine |
| 02:06.52 | drmessano | "Wanna see some hatred?" |
| 02:06.57 | Samot | A recycled and tired routine that so many have done before him. Uninteresting, unimaginative and uncreative. |
| 02:07.57 | Samot | Or even worse... |
| 02:08.02 | Samot | A Tyler Perry movie. |
| 02:08.23 | drmessano | Soul Food 3 |
| 02:08.50 | Samot | I kid you not, my wife was just watching 50 Shades of Black. |
| 02:08.59 | drmessano | HAH |
| 02:09.11 | Samot | I remember when the Wayon's were funny. |
| 02:09.27 | Samot | And not one trick ponies. |
| 02:09.29 | drmessano | Im not sure the kids were ever funny |
| 02:09.57 | drmessano | Marlon and Damon and that whole crew |
| 02:10.09 | drmessano | Marlin.. |
| 02:10.19 | Samot | Damon was funny as hell. |
| 02:10.32 | drmessano | God yes |
| 02:10.43 | Samot | In Living Color was awesome. |
| 02:12.00 | *** join/#asterisk simplydrew (~simplydre@unaffiliated/simplydrew) |
| 02:13.22 | *** join/#asterisk justdave_ (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 02:35.07 | TECFALL | I am just starting to teach myself asterisk. I want to make sure I am doing things as secure as possible. Is this how I would go about connecting two asterisk servers and their devices (desk phones)? http://pastie.org/10900709 |
| 02:37.52 | TECFALL | Oops. I had a typo on the site peer names: http://pastie.org/10900710 |
| 03:05.32 | *** join/#asterisk Oatmeal (~Suzeanne@75-103-145-152.ccrtc.com) |
| 03:09.20 | hojuruku | I may as well go out with a bang. My dad is being sued for not loving GAY MARRIAGE ACTIVISTS (pubished as such) ramming their cocks up infant arseholes, then after they get arrested the greatest gay marriage activist in singapore put the photos of baby rapists Mark Newton and Peter Truong with their child rape victim up online as a poster boy for gay marriage. So i'll spam this youtube comment complete with typos now and be gone! Homophobic |
| 03:09.21 | hojuruku | not to love gay baby sex eh? My dad deserves to be sued for critizing those who fuck babies? Seriously guys and gays... I rather be banned than be here with people who say it's homophobic to oppose all children given instruction by in school to join adult gay porn sites. That's just the tip of the iceberg. fucken queers don't own open source. |
| 03:09.22 | hojuruku | Yesterday 5:39 PM |
| 03:09.22 | hojuruku | <PROTECTED> |
| 03:09.26 | hojuruku | Edit |
| 03:09.28 | hojuruku | <PROTECTED> |
| 03:09.30 | hojuruku | +Genevieve Topalov +Sharon Gifford +Penny Sharpe |
| 03:09.32 | hojuruku | The Gay baby sex lover suing my dad for vilifying published (http://tinyurl.com/equalmarriageequalsboyrape) Gay Marriage activists Mark Newton and Peter Truong having hardcore anal sex with 22 month old Drake Newton and Russian infant ( because it's homosexual vilification crime not to love published gay marriage activists forcing their penis through a baby's anus as described in US supreme court documents linked to from these this site: |
| 03:09.37 | hojuruku | http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2013/07/the-story-the-abc-doesn-t-want-you-to-see/) Also see about my dad's lawsuit: His online comment: https://web.archive.org/web/20140722080525/https://www.causes.com/posts/891061 - the video he linked to in that comment about gay dads baby anal sex : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sH8VeOIP7g |
| 03:09.41 | hojuruku | Anyway if you want you can look into the eyes of the gay dads baby sex victim still being used for as a poster boy for gay marriage, gay adoption and decrminalizing sodomy in singapore by Sigapore's greatest Gay Marraige Activist who uploaded a picuture of and named the child rape victim 8 months after his rapist gay dads were arrested. Wordpress say it's homophobic to oppose gay dads baby fuck victims being used as poster boys for Gay |
| 03:09.46 | hojuruku | marriage and for the rest of that life that rape victim boy has to see his photo being used to push the cause of those who raped him as a baby. http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/pastor-ambushes-goh-chok-tong-with-demand-to-defend-377a/ |
| 03:09.50 | hojuruku | Here is my dad's recent radio interview about the ongoing lawsuit being accused of the cirme of not loving baby anal sex by http://twitter.com/garryburnsblog &@PIACNEWS &@NCATNSW &@nodiscrim http://www.truthnews.com.au/web/radio/story/cultural_marxism_101 - Anyway back on topic - this baby sex lover serial gay homosexual vilification litigant Garry "Boylover" Burns and first gay marriage activist on national TV after Australian former |
| 03:09.57 | hojuruku | Rainbow Labor Prime minister first announced gay marriage -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY-HOPphCps suing my dad on his blog praises safe schools and Alister Crowley's accolite Alfred Kinsey - watch the Kinesy Syndrome and Kinsey's pedophiles documentaries on youtube (YOU MUST SEE THESE). He was the first to "find" children are sexual objects. Here is how he did it! He ruled that when a baby shakes in pain it's having an orgasm in his |
| 03:10.02 | hojuruku | book Sexual history of the American male. Then he got some of his OTOAustralia.org.au NAZI baby raping mates to fuck a baby and watch it shake in pain until it had "an orgasm" . Then he ruled child are sexual beings! So there you have it because a nazi satanist raped a baby up the arse and it shook in pain all our kids need gay child sex education. Do you follow the logic? Because I don't. |
| 03:10.21 | hojuruku | That's about #safeschools - so is this buddy the founder of the program wrote a paper the gays must support the pedo kidfuckers, read it on the scribd link here: |
| 03:10.28 | hojuruku | http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/twos-company-threes-allowed-luke-mckee-4-7-16/ |
| 03:10.48 | hojuruku | ok go ban, see if i care, goodnight |
| 03:11.12 | hojuruku | Samot: and lets end it with this. YOU ARE A CUCK |
| 03:11.20 | hojuruku | <Samot> I kid you not, my wife was just watching 50 Shades of Black. |
| 03:12.21 | hojuruku | and remember i wasn't the first to say faggot or homophobic on this channel today, there are logs guys. now rotate on that and piss off. |
| 03:12.30 | Samot | So is someone going to ban this guy? |
| 03:12.45 | hojuruku | lady wife sharing cucks go first.. oh sorry they go last :P |
| 03:13.45 | Samot | Very clever. |
| 03:14.13 | hojuruku | no more pearls after swine |
| 03:32.08 | hojuruku | with 10 years of hojuruku@gmail.com lurking on the digium mailing list a perm ban would give me an outlet to bitch about to a lot of people. |
| 03:32.40 | hojuruku | the post would be about selective enforcement of your acceptable use policy whatever, considering you twats mentioned "homophobia" and the words "faggot" first calling me one. |
| 03:32.53 | hojuruku | i think i got away with ^^^ so leave it at that cuck. |
| 03:32.56 | Samot | No one called you anything. |
| 03:33.11 | hojuruku | yes they did, scroll up. a fair bit :P |
| 03:33.30 | Samot | Let me correct that. |
| 03:33.35 | hojuruku | liar, queers and cuck libs always lie through their teeth when they caught out like jacob blaustien all over my youtube.com/hojuruku channelo. |
| 03:33.40 | Samot | No one called you anything until you started spew spam |
| 03:34.14 | hojuruku | he supports bowersox the pedo gay cop done for child porn who came out as a homo after being arrested for child porn here: who attempted to murder me in 05. http://www.cellpals.com/bowersoxchristopher1210.htm |
| 03:34.26 | Samot | Shame if failed. |
| 03:34.33 | Samot | Shame it failed. |
| 03:34.40 | hojuruku | i'll sroll up and find the first rude thing said to anyone since i joined with a tech support question |
| 03:35.01 | Samot | Yes. I've read the comment. |
| 03:35.17 | Samot | You came in here for support on something that's not supported here. |
| 03:35.21 | hojuruku | <hojuruku> [TK]D-Fender I love you already mate! I got banned from #lede-dev for not supporting gay marriage. I hope that openwrt fork dies and gets gobbled up like libav will soon be by FFMPEG! |
| 03:35.21 | hojuruku | <hojuruku> funny bugger you'r cool. I'm a conserative anti-gay-pedophilia activist and i like your use of the word faggot. I am http://twitter.com/VGB_OPSEC - refugee of the west gay pedos like snowden and assange http://bit.ly/aurefugee2 for the UNHCR paperwork in HK before snowden went there b4 russia. |
| 03:35.22 | Samot | Were told numerous tims. |
| 03:35.30 | hojuruku | my responses are there, where's this channel log it doesn't go back that far. |
| 03:35.34 | Samot | You kept spamming about your issue that we can't solve. |
| 03:36.39 | hojuruku | pastebin time |
| 03:37.39 | hojuruku | http://pastebin.ca/3655837 unfortuantely [TK]D-Fender first attack using the word faggot about openwrt isn't in the scrollback i assumed it was i have to increase my buffer size or use znc (ON OPENWRT.. naah a host in russia) |
| 03:38.05 | hojuruku | anyway after i his openwrt jibe there was a big discussion about other pissed of asterisk users defending it for like a hour after i left the chat. |
| 03:38.56 | Samot | Sure. |
| 03:39.16 | hojuruku | anyway don't be twats i'll find someone who put the logs in google, you ban, then everyone who ever contributed to the user -dev list gets spammed. you don't like free speech i'll give you a taste of it. what you going to do? I'm a political refugee in a non-extradition country like weev who did the nazi printer hack. |
| 03:39.18 | Samot | However, I haven't seen anyone spew hate comments for the last six hours. |
| 03:39.25 | hojuruku | hate of baby sex? |
| 03:39.25 | Samot | Except for you. |
| 03:40.04 | hojuruku | do you love baby sex? is it wrong to critize gay marriage activists doing human trafficking and sharing their son in 30 countries with a passport they shouldn't have got. Listen them to say it's homophobic to oppose is fucking babies here http://archive.org/details/TwoDadsAreBetterThanOne |
| 03:40.42 | hojuruku | listen to the radio stations call them disgusting, they my gay stalker sues my dad for making a comment about them linking to my youtube channel. then there is the case of @sunoljohn being sued and he lost in court because he linked to http://tinyurl.com/abcplugspedos - search abcplugspedos in austlii.edu.au case law |
| 03:40.50 | hojuruku | it's really a crime not to love sticking your cock up a babies arse |
| 03:41.11 | Samot | You're the one fixated on it. Not us. |
| 03:41.54 | hojuruku | me and the whole national media: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lKi35LBQE |
| 03:42.20 | hojuruku | i used the psychological projection argument first. Faggots are trying to take my families home. OK I am meant to bead down and not fixate on it. No big deal we are being sued for not loving fucking babies. |
| 03:42.26 | hojuruku | sorry gay marriage activists published as such fucking babies. |
| 03:42.46 | hojuruku | you sick bastards used faggots first on a chat dev chat room and called me a faggot. You deserved what you got. |
| 03:42.56 | hojuruku | I only talked tech and tech only first. Check the logs pricks. |
| 03:43.16 | Samot | And if you check the logs, I replied to your questions with tech answers. |
| 03:44.15 | hojuruku | for god sake i'll write the siproxd plugin myself if i have to rather than try and see how slim asterisk can be on openwrt. it's tainted, not openwrt astersik with lefist dvelopers that say if you don't love acts of pedophilia done by those who identify as gay dads you are a homophobe |
| 03:44.32 | SeiGGy | wow, apparently I walked back to my PC at the totally wrong moment |
| 03:44.41 | Samot | What did the last part of that statement have to do with the first part. |
| 03:44.56 | Samot | Absolutely nothing. |
| 03:45.06 | Samot | So you make talking about the tech part not even worth it. |
| 03:45.23 | Samot | Because now you just sound like a idiot spewing random idiotic things. |
| 03:45.45 | hojuruku | look in the eyes of the gay dads baby fuck victim and tell me i'm wrong. http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/pastor-ambushes-goh-chok-tong-with-demand-to-defend-377a/ that was posted 8 months after the two men in the photo arrested for child sex. Why is it a crime to vilify those who identify as gay? Peter Truong's lawyer last week said he identifies as a homosexual not a pedophile (Angeln Gates CC steve Debrota) watch LEFTIST GAY |
| 03:45.45 | hojuruku | ABC talk about these baby fuckers in 2 hour documentary made by a lesbian carol meldrum hanna - 4 corners the boy with the henna tattoo - why is it a crime to vilify them raping babies? |
| 03:46.22 | Samot | You do realize that the high majority of child molesters are not gay. |
| 03:46.42 | hojuruku | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xufh8XysHJ4 |
| 03:47.32 | hojuruku | Samot: CDC says 1.8 % of america gay, so 1.0% homosexual male. 35% of all child sex cases are gay man on boy rape. Want the government sources. That means a mother has to be 30x times more concerned about a gay man near their kid than a hetrosexual. Those are the cold hard facts? Want gov sources? Please say yes you know i got them |
| 03:48.12 | Samot | Are you kidding me? |
| 03:48.20 | hojuruku | but technically more pedophiles hetrosexual. on in 1 gay search "pubmed homosexuality pedophilia" for a real medical study done by PHD's in statistics and medicine - not uc davis rainbow psych department. |
| 03:48.38 | hojuruku | but homosexual pedophiles are more prolific rape more victims per pedo. |
| 03:49.04 | Samot | Do you have an actual Asterisk question? |
| 03:49.11 | Samot | Or perhaps even a VoIP related question? |
| 03:49.13 | hojuruku | it's a homosexual act to do male on male anal sex right? the gay cop that arresetd me in america now jailed for kiddy porn also had an adult latino partner, so you can't say he's not a gay pedo too. |
| 03:49.13 | Samot | Or topic? |
| 03:49.29 | hojuruku | I did before before you faggots started attacking me dropping the faggot word first when i only talked tech |
| 03:49.34 | SeiGGy | did this guy come from /b/ or something? |
| 03:49.38 | Samot | No one attacked you. |
| 03:49.43 | Samot | At all. |
| 03:49.49 | hojuruku | http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr077.pdf CDC STATS |
| 03:50.01 | hojuruku | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756 |
| 03:50.09 | Samot | Oh he's upset because he can't get siproxd to not be non-RFC compliant. |
| 03:50.19 | hojuruku | most cited study on PUBMED nothing refutes it. |
| 03:50.20 | SeiGGy | ah |
| 03:50.23 | Samot | And therefore can't work with the "broken" telcos. |
| 03:50.48 | nix8n82 | So everyone in #asterisk made you a victim hojuruku? |
| 03:50.53 | hojuruku | https://www.bravehearts.org.au/files/Facts%20and%20Stats_updated141212.pdf that's where the 35% comes from it's actually 38% for boys but the 3% are hetorsexual women child raping cougars. |
| 03:51.08 | SeiGGy | yeah, I'll just hang out over here and keep working on ARI then |
| 03:51.11 | hojuruku | nope just Samot and [TK]D-Fender being twats. |
| 03:51.13 | Samot | Because, you know, proxies add route records on packets that pass through them. |
| 03:51.36 | Samot | hahah. [TK]D-Fender hasn't said a word in like six hours. |
| 03:51.44 | Samot | That's him being a twat for sure. |
| 03:51.51 | hojuruku | now im done. leave me alone you pricks you started it- scroll way back before things got hot and see who are the name calling faggots. I'm like Rambo now saying BUT HE TOOK FIRST BLOOD |
| 03:52.02 | hojuruku | yeah and i been up more than 6 hours |
| 03:52.24 | nix8n82 | Why are you punishing the rest of the channel with worthless crap? |
| 03:52.35 | Samot | No one knows. |
| 03:52.44 | Samot | But it's been like six hours. |
| 03:52.51 | hojuruku | it's worthless to keep children save from leftist programmers who beleive every young child should get gay child sex education lessons. ah fuck off. i don't want to be here. |
| 03:52.58 | SeiGGy | ok...so any news on TTS for ARI? |
| 03:53.04 | hojuruku | i'll leave, if you perm ban tomorrow I'll spam next moth. otherwise fuck off |
| 03:53.04 | Samot | All because all day today we told him we couldn't support his siproxd issues. |
| 03:53.08 | nix8n82 | Yes yes it is |
| 03:53.15 | *** part/#asterisk hojuruku (~sabayonus@unaffiliated/hojuruku) |
| 03:53.34 | Samot | And I bet he really feels like he "won" |
| 03:53.36 | SeiGGy | oh thank FSM...what the fuck was his problem? |
| 03:53.42 | Samot | He showed us. |
| 03:53.45 | Samot | That was it. |
| 03:53.52 | Samot | He kept asking about siproxd |
| 03:53.57 | Samot | We told him we don't support it. |
| 03:54.00 | Samot | He kept going. |
| 03:54.05 | SeiGGy | I haven't seen madness like that since #warez back in like '96 when I was a teenager...lmao |
| 03:55.16 | Samot | Oh sorry, this was over OpenWRT. |
| 03:55.29 | Samot | And TK expressing his opinion on it and it's users. |
| 03:55.47 | SeiGGy | wow...some people... |
| 03:56.17 | SeiGGy | well in other news, seriously though, any news about Asterisk 14 in the last month or so? |
| 03:56.36 | Samot | I'll most likely skip over it. |
| 03:57.00 | SeiGGy | I seriously need the generic TTS in it for ARI |
| 03:57.17 | SeiGGy | that's the last hold over for us keeping our old SIP Engines around (VoiceElements & ACULAB) |
| 03:59.53 | Samot | I'm not a 100% on ARI but how is ARI not handling TTS? |
| 04:01.16 | Samot | Oh I see what you're saying. |
| 04:02.13 | SeiGGy | yeah, can't fire off TTS generation from ARI yet |
| 04:02.19 | SeiGGy | it's slated for Asterisk 14 |
| 04:02.29 | SeiGGy | and I'm not about to go back to AGI to get it to work |
| 04:03.21 | SeiGGy | all good though, they'll roll out 14 soon enough, found a post that feature lock is July 20th, which means we could probably see it released by EOY |
| 04:03.40 | Samot | It's slated for October but it looks like that questionable. |
| 04:03.49 | SeiGGy | as long as 14 is out by summer 17', I won't have to worry about trying to integrate AGI |
| 04:03.54 | Samot | It's "tentative" right now. |
| 04:04.07 | SeiGGy | yeah, I'm guessing probably Dec-Feb is more likely |
| 04:04.26 | Samot | You seriously can't make an ARI call to TTS engine? |
| 04:04.32 | SeiGGy | nope |
| 04:04.39 | SeiGGy | not that I've found at least |
| 04:04.55 | Samot | Well that may change my AGI to ARI plans. |
| 04:05.54 | SeiGGy | problem is that every TTS engine has a different API, so there was no shared standard for ARI to wrap |
| 04:06.10 | Samot | That part I understand. |
| 04:06.27 | Samot | I just didn't realize I just couldn't use ARI to make the call like I do with AGI or dialplan. |
| 04:06.55 | SeiGGy | so each engine needs to extend ARI (which I haven't found one that does yet) until they add the generic TTS API to ARI and then the TTS providers implement the API |
| 04:06.58 | Samot | I haven't had a lot of time to really play with ARI in any application. |
| 04:07.17 | SeiGGy | ARI is what got us to move to Asterisk |
| 04:07.50 | Samot | Well in the grand scheme ARI is still young. |
| 04:07.54 | SeiGGy | we're a C#/.NET shop, and our previous stuff used VoiceElements, which is a really overpriced SIP Engine from some Saudi Arabian company |
| 04:08.20 | SeiGGy | and then ACULAB before that, which was an Israelie company I think |
| 04:09.12 | SeiGGy | err VE was in Denver and maybe their support was in SA? I can't remember...we've not been too happy with them lately |
| 04:09.55 | SeiGGy | so when we went to rebuild our platform, we evaluated a bunch of different packages, and Asterisk 13 had just come out of beta with ARI support. And it worked perfect for us. So we've started rebuilding our platform around it |
| 04:10.43 | SeiGGy | went to AstriCon 15, solved a few problems we had with early implementation, and found out the roadmap for TTS support |
| 04:11.57 | SeiGGy | I've got this crazy workaround that I've been working on that might work as a stopgap if 14 gets delayed past Feb. Involves calling a TTS server to generate the audio file, FTP it to the Asterisk instance, then use ARI to force asterisk to reload the sound files, and play the newly generated audio |
| 04:12.03 | SeiGGy | it's hacky as shit, lmao, but I think it'll work |
| 04:24.35 | *** join/#asterisk L337gamer21 (~L337gamer@75-163-181-146.clsp.qwest.net) |
| 04:25.20 | L337gamer21 | Hello - I Need Some Help With Asterisk - Should Be Super Simple lol |
| 04:31.58 | L337gamer21 | is anyone here tonight :) |
| 04:38.08 | ChannelZ | Yes |
| 04:39.18 | L337gamer21 | Nice :) Im Having A Bit Of A Hard Time Getting Something On ASterisk Server To Work. It Should Be Possible But I Cant Figure It Out |
| 04:39.59 | *** join/#asterisk bof22 (~Thunderbi@185.13.183.107) |
| 04:40.18 | L337gamer21 | Need To Give Customer 800 Number -> Customer Calls That # - Answers Plays A Announcement - Then I Need It To Transfer It To One Of Our Local DID's On The Same System |
| 04:40.48 | L337gamer21 | If Anyone Could Help That Would Be Amazing :) - If Not Thats Fine Too |
| 04:41.09 | ChannelZ | yeah.. ok.. |
| 04:41.13 | ChannelZ | waves |
| 04:42.33 | Samot | Ain't no one got time to wait more than a minute for an answer. |
| 04:43.45 | *** join/#asterisk L337gamer21 (~L337gamer@75-163-181-146.clsp.qwest.net) |
| 04:45.15 | L337gamer21 | Note To Self - Dont Use Quit In Chat Window - Im New To IRC If Anyone Cant Tell lol |
| 04:46.13 | ChannelZ | Well you've got your shift key working pretty good :P |
| 04:46.29 | ChannelZ | So do you have an existing, already running Asterisk setup? |
| 04:47.22 | L337gamer21 | Yes - I do - i have always typed like that. its easier for me |
| 04:47.49 | wyoung | Samot: bronchitis? |
| 04:48.57 | Samot | ? |
| 04:49.17 | wyoung | Samot: something else you aint go not time for |
| 04:50.26 | ChannelZ | Well so what you want to do is not hard though I'm unclear on the last bit, "I need it to transfer to one of our local DIDs on the same system" |
| 04:50.56 | L337gamer21 | sorry |
| 04:51.31 | ChannelZ | You would just Goto() to jump to whatever extension handles that DID if you're wanting it to behave like someone called that DID which is handled by the same asterisk |
| 04:52.03 | L337gamer21 | oh ok |
| 04:52.48 | L337gamer21 | yeah basically the customer calls a 1-800 number and we want to have that customer auto transfered to a local area number to deal with that IVR and select what dept |
| 04:53.03 | L337gamer21 | now to go read up on Goto() :) |
| 04:53.42 | ChannelZ | Yeah if that IVR is on the same system you just Goto(context,extension,priority) |
| 04:54.36 | ChannelZ | like Goto(incoming,3334445555,1) assuming 3334445555 was your DID which was in the [incoming] context, and that's where your IVR for that normally starts... |
| 04:55.50 | L337gamer21 | that makes sense :) |
| 04:56.34 | Samot | Why do you need to transfer the number? |
| 04:56.46 | Samot | Why can't the 800 number just hit the IVR? |
| 04:56.55 | ChannelZ | Presumably he has dialplan that does things already created |
| 04:57.19 | L337gamer21 | to get the call off of the 800 number thats charging per the min |
| 04:57.28 | Samot | That's not how it works. |
| 04:57.31 | ChannelZ | Oh. Well that's actually different. |
| 04:57.41 | Samot | The call is coming in on the 800 |
| 04:57.43 | ChannelZ | You can't transfer it "off" the line like that |
| 04:57.50 | Samot | What you do with inside the PBX has no bearing on the charges. |
| 04:57.54 | Samot | You're still getting charged. |
| 04:58.25 | Samot | The only way to avoid a toll free charge is to either not use it or call them back. |
| 04:59.31 | Samot | So in this case the 800 should just hit the IVR. |
| 04:59.37 | Samot | Because that's where it needs to go. |
| 05:00.01 | L337gamer21 | yeah it is :) trying to save money but i guess i will just deal with it :) |
| 05:00.26 | Samot | The carrier isn't charging you because the call hit your PBX. |
| 05:00.40 | Samot | Your carrier is charging you because they connected to call and have to pay for it. |
| 05:00.53 | Samot | The terminating carrier on a toll free pays the costs. |
| 05:03.07 | L337gamer21 | :) Makes Sense |
| 05:03.41 | L337gamer21 | I Need To Take Asterisk Training lol :) |
| 05:03.47 | *** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@165.255.59.184) |
| 05:14.02 | L337gamer21 | Thanks For The Info - Ill Be On Here Just On Another Screen |
| 05:22.56 | *** part/#asterisk L337gamer21 (~L337gamer@75-163-181-146.clsp.qwest.net) |
| 05:33.30 | *** join/#asterisk robink_ (~quassel@unaffilated/robink) |
| 05:45.50 | *** join/#asterisk bof22 (~Thunderbi@185.13.183.107) |
| 05:50.21 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 05:52.01 | *** join/#asterisk [[thufir]] (~thufir@192.157.119.39) |
| 06:01.21 | [[thufir]] | what's the distinction between sip trunking and sip registration? |
| 06:01.27 | *** join/#asterisk st2 (~st@static.78-158-207-178.kgts.ru) |
| 06:04.04 | *** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw) |
| 06:04.28 | st2 | hello, i had issue with Dial command inside GoSub subroutine. when Dial command exit with non-zero status, executing of subroutine interrupts too. When caller hangup before connect i've got interrupt of my extension scenario. http://pastebin.com/1aVmqAtZ here is my call log, And here is my part of dialplan according to incomming call http://pastebin.com/giD6vVLg |
| 06:21.05 | st2 | Any suggestions? |
| 06:48.14 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 06:54.40 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@d5152CCD8.static.telenet.be) |
| 06:57.24 | *** join/#asterisk jchillerup (~xxxxx@ip-188-95-224-221.kna.citycloud.se) |
| 06:58.32 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:59.58 | jchillerup | Hi. I need some handholding! :) I want to set up Asterisk in a two-site (but still very small-scale, around 40 handsets) setup, where one of the sites is on a satellite link. I'm concerned about how the latency (800ms-ish, 600 on a good day) might affect the communication on a protocol level. Does SIP/IAX2 suffer at such high latency? |
| 07:00.52 | Samot | st2 "exit non-zero status" is not an error. |
| 07:02.17 | st2 | yep, i know. but interrupt of scenario is issue for me. call isn't going to h extension. it's just interrupt |
| 07:02.57 | Samot | Well it's ringing extension 102 |
| 07:03.04 | Samot | I don't see 102 pick up the call. |
| 07:03.52 | st2 | yep, cause i've hangup call to check non-zero exit of dial |
| 07:04.11 | st2 | using dial inside subroutine is correct? |
| 07:05.23 | Samot | Yes. |
| 07:05.30 | Samot | You can use dial in the subroutine. |
| 07:08.50 | Samot | Well I don't see an h extension in the dialplan so when you hang up, it's done. It just processes a normal hang up. |
| 07:09.01 | st2 | and what behavior is expected when dial command exit with non-zero status inside of subroutine? |
| 07:09.16 | st2 | going to h extension of subroutine? |
| 07:09.20 | Samot | It means that dial() completed successfully. |
| 07:10.01 | Samot | You're also not dialing from the sub.. |
| 07:10.13 | Samot | You're dialing from the results of that subroutine check. |
| 07:10.30 | Samot | Unless there is more dialplan you are not showing. |
| 07:13.17 | st2 | -- Executing [incomming@sub-call:18] ExecIf("SIP/sip_new-pops_1-0000670f", "0?Playback(vm-nobodyavail):Dial(SIP/new-pops_102,60,gM(logger)t)") in new stack |
| 07:13.38 | st2 | i call from "call" subroutine |
| 07:13.52 | Samot | So there is more dialplan. |
| 07:14.06 | Samot | Because you're not showing what calls the sub-call subroutine. |
| 07:14.31 | st2 | ok, let me a little time i'll publish all dialplan of this user |
| 07:14.59 | Samot | Well perhaps someone else will be able to help. It's 3:15AM for me. I'm heading to bed. |
| 07:18.59 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 07:21.12 | st2 | ok, thank you for answers) |
| 07:22.22 | *** join/#asterisk makowals (~makowals@matt-mbp.cern.ch) |
| 07:22.24 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 07:29.17 | *** join/#asterisk mirela666 (~mirkob@2a00:1950:400:0:79d3:e955:4a6d:5dd8) |
| 07:29.50 | *** join/#asterisk UncleKiwi (~UncleKiwi@unaffiliated/unclekiwi) |
| 07:36.33 | *** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-41-127.rn.hr.cox.net) |
| 07:41.42 | *** join/#asterisk ronybeck (~rony@46.140.63.234) |
| 07:46.21 | *** join/#asterisk tparcina (~tomo@212.92.200.41) |
| 07:54.50 | *** join/#asterisk cervajs2 (~cervenka@gatekeeper.bm.ipex.cz) |
| 08:02.30 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@137.158.23.63) |
| 08:15.45 | *** join/#asterisk whizzi_ (~whizzi@185.21.52.255) |
| 08:16.56 | *** join/#asterisk mub (~Jub@65-123-23-3.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 08:25.58 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.4.0.122) |
| 09:42.20 | *** join/#asterisk hojuruku (~sabayonus@unaffiliated/hojuruku) |
| 10:00.36 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe1 (~CeBe@a81-14-235-90.net-htp.de) |
| 10:06.04 | *** join/#asterisk pppingme (~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme) |
| 10:06.14 | *** join/#asterisk babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-asswdsnmyfbyvgvi) |
| 10:18.00 | file | good morning |
| 10:19.20 | st2 | morning. could you help me with Dial issue inside GoSub sobroutine? |
| 10:22.43 | file | this early probably not |
| 10:23.02 | file | attempts to wake up |
| 10:26.42 | st2 | ok, I can wait. |
| 10:27.16 | st2 | while you're awaiking I post new call log and full extensions of user |
| 10:27.23 | file | if you provide the info that Samot mentioned, someone else may be able to help |
| 10:27.24 | *** join/#asterisk pppingme (~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme) |
| 10:27.45 | st2 | http://pastebin.com/52xh6Ywm - new call log |
| 10:28.27 | st2 | http://pastebin.com/2qLVeKjJ - more extensions. include subroutines and pickup extension of user |
| 10:29.14 | st2 | any help will be appreciated |
| 10:32.59 | *** join/#asterisk clopez (~tau@neutrino.es) |
| 10:38.47 | *** join/#asterisk sebm (~sebastien@84.19.41.82) |
| 11:02.21 | *** join/#asterisk catphish (~catphish@unaffiliated/catphish) |
| 11:02.50 | catphish | is there a documented method by which chan_sip chooses a peer for an incoming sip request? |
| 11:18.33 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@137.158.23.63) |
| 11:21.59 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@dustpuppy.is.co.za) |
| 11:55.55 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 11:57.19 | *** join/#asterisk chendy (~alexc@121.34.131.71) |
| 11:59.43 | *** part/#asterisk chendy (~alexc@121.34.131.71) |
| 12:07.41 | *** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 12:16.11 | *** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 12:28.43 | *** join/#asterisk zerohalo (~zerohalo@uranium.zerohalo.net) |
| 12:29.53 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~Joe@216-191-106-165.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 12:35.57 | [TK]D-Fender | catphish, by IP clearly. First one gets it. if that one's auth doesn't work you're DOA. |
| 12:36.26 | [TK]D-Fender | user = from. Friend = user + peer |
| 12:42.45 | catphish | oh, i think i need to better understand the different types, when i said peer, i meant any combination of user / peer / etc |
| 12:43.16 | catphish | so user is based on the from header only? and peer based on the IP only? |
| 12:49.22 | [TK]D-Fender | for device selection, yes |
| 12:49.35 | [TK]D-Fender | then the auth is checked against that "first hit" and that's what you've got |
| 12:49.51 | [TK]D-Fender | So multiple peers with same host = FIRST one hit EVERY time |
| 13:10.09 | catphish | last question: which takes precedence? username, or IP address, which one is matched first? |
| 13:13.26 | [TK]D-Fender | I *think* it's the user. Easy to test.... |
| 13:15.49 | file | user |
| 13:16.19 | *** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50) |
| 13:19.01 | [TK]D-Fender | yes given "friend" is what I use for multiple devices behind the same NAT so that it hits the username first |
| 13:19.27 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 13:20.48 | catphish | makes perfect sense, thanks, i also frequently uses devices behind a NAT, but then i wondered if that only worked because of the recorded port |
| 13:21.11 | catphish | i guess users don't require registration, so there wouldn't always be a port recorded |
| 13:21.27 | catphish | thanks both! |
| 13:26.15 | *** join/#asterisk malcolmd (malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 13:26.15 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 13:48.44 | file | users don't actually have any host or port at all |
| 13:51.08 | [TK]D-Fender | Doesn't "host" technically restrict the origin? |
| 13:51.49 | [TK]D-Fender | Where if a device has registered when dynamic, that last reg (while respected) gets used to filter out non-reg attempts at calls? |
| 13:53.55 | catphish | my understanding (i may be wrong): users don't have a host/port, they authenticate and make calls, friends can register, then they have a host/port from the registration, optionally they can send invites without further auth (from the host/port they registered from) "insecure=invite" |
| 13:55.51 | [TK]D-Fender | insecure has it not challenge peers based on the IP, not sure if it takes the user portion the same.... |
| 13:58.24 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-tqqsexwdtnurayit) |
| 14:04.04 | *** join/#asterisk apb1963 (~apb@107-146-220-94.res.bhn.net) |
| 14:05.22 | Samot | st2: So sub-call still isn't a sub-routine. It actually looks to be the main context for the calls. |
| 14:05.55 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@137.158.23.63) |
| 14:08.10 | *** join/#asterisk pvoigt_ (~Linux@unaffiliated/pvoigt) |
| 14:12.26 | *** join/#asterisk pvoigt_ (~Linux@unaffiliated/pvoigt) |
| 14:13.39 | st2 | Samot: incomming call goes throught new-pops_pickup extension. it's realteim extension that looks like: |
| 14:13.41 | st2 | new-pops_pickup | s | 1 | GoSub | sub-call,incomming,1(new-pops,SIP/new-pops_102&SIP/new-pops_101&SIP/new-pops_103) |
| 14:15.10 | Samot | I believe I specifically ask for that portion of the dialplan. All I got was an extended version of the original two contexts. |
| 14:15.28 | Samot | You said you were going to post all the dialplan. That part doesn't exist in what you posted. |
| 14:16.44 | Samot | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/ng1qKDM1/ |
| 14:16.54 | Samot | same => n,Goto(s,1) |
| 14:17.03 | Samot | You don't have an s extension in the context. |
| 14:19.48 | Samot | I'm still confused as to what the actual problem is. |
| 14:21.46 | st2 | (17:16:22) Samot: same => n,Goto(s,1) this is part of inc_wrong extension of sub-call context? |
| 14:22.08 | Samot | You don't have an s extension in sub-call |
| 14:22.40 | Samot | You don't have anything in sub-call that is: exten => s,1,SOMETHING |
| 14:23.08 | st2 | i know. this command is not valid. but it does not execute while incomming call processing |
| 14:24.25 | Samot | You understand that when you execute dial() it "leaves" the dialplan to deal with dial() |
| 14:24.36 | *** join/#asterisk happy-dude (uid62780@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fhbdrudfrogcjwpy) |
| 14:24.42 | Samot | So the next line after dial() should be dealing with that response. |
| 14:25.57 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 14:26.00 | Samot | Again, this is a subroutine call. You haven't show the actual dialplan that calls this subcall routine and how it handles the call after the dial. |
| 14:28.10 | st2 | http://pastebin.com/CYJvaEwV full new-pops_pickup context |
| 14:28.56 | st2 | i thought that i can call sub-routine in s extension and fully process call inside subroutine |
| 14:29.52 | st2 | so after Dial exiting asterisk try to find command by address new-pops_pickup,s,2 ? |
| 14:30.38 | Samot | There is no 2 |
| 14:31.06 | Samot | You call sub-call... |
| 14:31.43 | Samot | Sub-call does stuff, hits dial(), completes dial(), returns back to new-pops_pickup,s,1 to do something next. |
| 14:32.17 | Samot | You've actually have never left new_pops_pickup,s,1 when you call sub-call. |
| 14:32.37 | *** join/#asterisk newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-pawuiulhigzsgxaq) |
| 14:32.37 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 14:32.48 | Samot | So the next thing that's going to happen is h |
| 14:33.12 | Samot | Oh wait, this is database output |
| 14:33.24 | Samot | Not the actual dialplan that was written out. |
| 14:34.22 | st2 | can I show you dialplan before changes? i working on another clients now. maybe it will be heplful |
| 14:34.52 | Samot | Sure. |
| 14:34.57 | Samot | But all of it, not pieces. |
| 14:39.55 | *** join/#asterisk justdave_ (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 14:40.34 | st2 | http://pastebin.com/H5A9smzf - context of another user |
| 14:40.42 | st2 | sorry for formatting( |
| 14:45.33 | st2 | whin dial() exitting into s extension of nasty112_pickup context it successfully going to next after dial extension |
| 14:56.18 | *** join/#asterisk KerioMorgan (~Adium@us.kerio.com) |
| 14:56.23 | st2 | sorry. it goes to nasty112_pickup,h,1 extension |
| 14:58.30 | *** join/#asterisk absentbird (~absentbir@216.235.104.187) |
| 14:58.32 | Samot | I'm not reading database output. |
| 14:58.37 | Samot | Show me an actual dialplan. |
| 14:58.46 | absentbird | I am trying to troubleshoot some analog lines through a t1 card on an asterisk server. Is there a simple way to send a ring to a channel to see where it goes? |
| 14:59.38 | [TK]D-Fender | T1 != analog |
| 14:59.59 | absentbird | Right, it then goes to a channel bank which outputs analog |
| 15:00.06 | absentbird | I probably should have mentioned that. |
| 15:00.19 | absentbird | But I am interested in ringing the channels from the asterisk server. |
| 15:00.40 | [TK]D-Fender | "dahdi show channels" |
| 15:00.54 | [TK]D-Fender | it'll tell you the context. non-DID based calls = "s" |
| 15:01.02 | [TK]D-Fender | (which you should already know) |
| 15:01.29 | [TK]D-Fender | Your configs should also tell you that context... |
| 15:01.39 | [TK]D-Fender | and shouldn't be confusing either |
| 15:01.40 | st2 | Samot: it is actual realtime dialplan |
| 15:01.55 | Samot | All dialplan is real time |
| 15:02.20 | st2 | i mean dialplan that storing in mysql database |
| 15:04.03 | absentbird | So I am trying to route this Asterisk server to an analog paging system. I don't know which channel the paging system is on though. I was thinking I could send a ring to each channel and see which one went to the paging system. |
| 15:05.28 | st2 | maybe asterisk searching h extension in sub-call context? |
| 15:06.01 | [TK]D-Fender | absentbird, that would be a call OUT. |
| 15:06.07 | [TK]D-Fender | absentbird, So ... go place calls |
| 15:06.13 | [TK]D-Fender | there is no "just send a ring" |
| 15:07.05 | absentbird | [TK]D-Fender: That... makes so much sense. Thank you. |
| 15:07.31 | *** part/#asterisk AviiNL (~AviiNL@185.21.52.255) |
| 15:13.18 | st2 | yep! |
| 15:13.58 | st2 | i've add new h extension in sub-call and it solve the problem |
| 15:14.09 | Samot | Yeah, what I said last night. |
| 15:14.14 | st2 | thank you Samot! |
| 15:14.24 | st2 | it was very hard to understood |
| 15:14.52 | st2 | i thought that subroutine should goto pickup extension |
| 15:14.55 | Samot | You were missing the h extension. |
| 15:15.00 | Samot | you had no way to process the hangup |
| 15:15.09 | Samot | Not hard to understand, I said it last night. |
| 15:17.13 | st2 | i thought that gosub it is like function in ordinary programming language |
| 15:18.26 | st2 | but it is like simple goto but with ability to transfer parameters |
| 15:19.23 | *** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-yxgywwgzcxsgtbso) |
| 15:23.58 | [TK]D-Fender | And a programmed return location |
| 15:27.21 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@137.158.23.63) |
| 15:30.29 | *** join/#asterisk F2Knight (~F2Knight@c-50-139-85-237.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 15:33.18 | Samot | Yup. |
| 15:33.32 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net) |
| 15:34.35 | *** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 15:36.56 | *** join/#asterisk scv (solar@162.217.176.109) |
| 15:37.10 | scv | is there a flag to disable q850 reason codes under ast13/pjsip |
| 15:37.25 | scv | afaik there's a setting for chan_sip but had no luck finding similar setting for chan_pjsip |
| 15:39.25 | scv | both yealink and grandstream don't play nicely with both sip and q.850 reasons, if they're both present they just ignore both |
| 15:39.39 | scv | yea it's an EP problem but getting gs to fix a bug is nigh impossible |
| 15:43.18 | *** part/#asterisk cervajs2 (~cervenka@gatekeeper.bm.ipex.cz) |
| 15:43.24 | Samot | Yup. It's also a Yealink bug. |
| 15:44.11 | *** join/#asterisk mjordan (mjordan@nat/digium/x-qznpratbjjcraxqk) |
| 15:44.12 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 15:45.25 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net) |
| 15:46.34 | scv | as far as i can see my only option is to strip the header with a proxy |
| 15:46.41 | scv | pjsip seems to offer no way to disable it |
| 15:47.08 | mjordan | scv: which header? |
| 15:47.30 | scv | Reason: Q.850;cause=[blah] |
| 15:47.42 | mjordan | why do you need it removed? |
| 15:47.45 | mjordan | Reason headers are pretty standard |
| 15:47.53 | Samot | Yealink and GS have issues with it. |
| 15:47.57 | scv | i stated above, both yealink and grandstream sip stacks fail to handle it properly |
| 15:47.59 | mjordan | that's ... odd. |
| 15:48.04 | mjordan | scv: sorry, just joined a bit ago |
| 15:48.05 | scv | well it's yealink and grandstream |
| 15:48.05 | Samot | Yealink users reported this problem like 5 months ago. |
| 15:48.08 | scv | what do you expect :) |
| 15:48.21 | scv | it took gs 9 months to fix the remote root bug i reported ... |
| 15:48.49 | mjordan | scv: have you tried unloading res_pjsip_rfc3326? |
| 15:49.26 | mjordan | RFC 3326 being the reason header RFC https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3326.txt |
| 15:49.46 | mjordan | That module in Asterisk - for the PJSIP stack - is what does the manipulation for that header. Not loading it *should* mean it isn't added. |
| 15:50.41 | scv | unloaded and seems to still fail, let me look at the sip messages |
| 15:50.42 | scv | sec |
| 15:51.58 | [TK]D-Fender | ~gs |
| 15:51.58 | infobot | GrandSuck phones & gateways are cheap junk which should be avoided with extreme prejudice. |
| 15:52.30 | Samot | ^ 100 |
| 15:52.32 | scv | find me a gigabit color desk phone that i can get for $40 |
| 15:52.35 | scv | and i'll switch |
| 15:52.40 | Samot | Snicker. |
| 15:52.55 | scv | i must have a hell of a pain tolerance though |
| 15:53.03 | mjordan | As odd as it is to say it when you're the guy on an open source project: sometimes, you really do get what you pay for. |
| 15:53.18 | scv | you do though :p |
| 15:53.29 | Samot | That's because Yealink isn't free beer. |
| 15:53.31 | scv | its acceptable for the price |
| 15:53.41 | Samot | Or GS. |
| 15:53.42 | scv | yealink is madly failing to comply with the gpl |
| 15:53.47 | scv | gs claims they do but they don't either |
| 15:54.15 | scv | yealink's "gpl sources" tarball contains a mips toolchain and some ancient 2.6.1x kernel |
| 15:54.22 | scv | their phones aren't even mips based |
| 15:54.27 | Samot | I always find it funny that people using cheap phones like Yealink and GS have issues making them work properly but still say "It's good for the price" |
| 15:54.49 | Samot | So you spent $40 on a phone then 3 hours getting it to work. |
| 15:55.04 | scv | the phone works fine outside of showing a missed call when that q.850 header is present |
| 15:55.06 | Samot | That would have been $160 phone in my case. |
| 15:55.18 | scv | 4x the price doesn't justify not having a "missed call" indicator |
| 15:55.30 | Samot | Get an SNOM |
| 15:55.32 | scv | also, we're talking about over 1000 phones in this case |
| 15:55.37 | Samot | Of course. |
| 15:55.39 | Samot | It's always the case. |
| 15:55.41 | scv | 4x the price makes a difference there |
| 15:55.46 | Samot | 1000 phones that don't do the one thing people want them to do |
| 15:57.10 | catphish | whats the issue with yealink? i've always found their support to be excellent |
| 15:57.19 | Samot | A 5 month old bug. |
| 15:57.29 | catphish | what was it? i missed that |
| 15:57.42 | Samot | It's not rfc3326 compliant. |
| 15:57.44 | catphish | or rather, i dont know what q.850 does |
| 15:57.52 | Samot | q.850 is the ISDN cause code. |
| 15:58.18 | catphish | just reading rfc3326 |
| 15:58.35 | catphish | the problem is they don't handle "answered elsewhere"? |
| 15:58.48 | Samot | Right. |
| 15:58.48 | scv | they do |
| 15:58.55 | scv | just doesn't work with both q.850 and sip header present |
| 15:59.09 | scv | chan_sip doesnt do that by default (optional toggle) thus the issue never surfaced |
| 15:59.24 | catphish | ah i see, i still use chan_sip atm |
| 15:59.52 | catphish | except... how does q.850 relate to SIP? |
| 16:00.00 | Samot | It's the ISDN code. |
| 16:00.06 | Samot | The codes that have been around forever. |
| 16:00.10 | Samot | Those translate to SIP |
| 16:00.15 | absentbird | how do I dial to a dahdi channel from the console? asterisk -r and then console dial [extension] but I'm not sure how to write the dahdi extensions. |
| 16:00.41 | catphish | yeah, i got that, but how does that relate to SIP? there's an extra header with ISDN info? |
| 16:00.54 | scv | the header supports identifying what type of code it is |
| 16:01.04 | catphish | ah ok |
| 16:01.05 | scv | chan_pjsip sends both the q.850 and SIP codes |
| 16:01.05 | Samot | q.850 cause code 18 |
| 16:01.10 | Samot | It means the user is busy |
| 16:01.15 | Samot | SIP gives you 486 |
| 16:01.54 | file | yeah, cause code mapping is not always a 1 to 1 thing, a few ISDN cause codes may map to the same SIP response code |
| 16:01.56 | Samot | So multiple q.850 cause codes end up translating to the same SIP code. |
| 16:02.21 | Samot | So you may get five 503 Errors from your carrier.. |
| 16:02.30 | Samot | But you could have 3 different q.850 codes |
| 16:03.34 | scv | anyway, as much as i'd love to not use grandstreams i'm a bit tied into them at this point :p |
| 16:03.41 | scv | i'm also very sadly intimately familiar with them so w/e |
| 16:04.01 | Samot | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/RaxCiGzu/ |
| 16:04.14 | Samot | That's how I deal with various q.850 codes for a client. |
| 16:04.43 | Samot | Those are basically the most common codes. |
| 16:04.52 | Samot | Along with 16 which is a successful call. |
| 16:05.41 | Samot | 22 = "This number has changed" |
| 16:07.13 | scv | mjordan: res_pjsip_rfc3326.so being unloaded results in *no* reason header |
| 16:07.25 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 16:09.12 | scv | http://paste.ee/r/2rhBL |
| 16:09.45 | scv | i can probably just patch chan_pjsip since i use my own rpms but i'd really rather not do that |
| 16:10.21 | scv | i wonder how much work is involved in making an actual proper toggle within asterisk |
| 16:10.33 | file | there is no configuration ability to select only one or not, unloading the module will indeed not add either |
| 16:10.53 | scv | rough |
| 16:11.33 | scv | i'm not even sure if a patch like that is acceptable to submit since it's just working around broken uac sip stacks |
| 16:11.34 | scv | :/ |
| 16:11.54 | file | to configure it? it would be |
| 16:12.04 | file | I mean, it would have to go through code review |
| 16:12.09 | scv | of course |
| 16:12.22 | file | but there's no reason from a fundamental perspective that it wouldn't be |
| 16:13.00 | *** join/#asterisk makowals (~makowals@adsl-84-227-186-141.adslplus.ch) |
| 16:14.21 | scv | i guess from a concept of purity, asterisk shouldn't be responsible for these phone manufacturers being lazy/incompetent/building their sip stack to work against chan_sip and not RFC |
| 16:14.27 | scv | but w/e |
| 16:14.39 | scv | i'll try patching it out and if that works i'll submit a patch with a toggle |
| 16:14.47 | file | good luck1 |
| 16:14.50 | file | ! |
| 16:14.52 | scv | thanks |
| 16:16.20 | scv | this would be my first time submitting a patch |
| 16:16.25 | scv | any wiki or docs on procedure? |
| 16:17.15 | file | https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Patch+Contribution+Process for how to contribute |
| 16:17.49 | file | from a "what you need to modify" there's not really any documentation, but if you find an option already you can follow it along and see |
| 16:22.35 | scv | the actual patchwork i'm not worried about just the procedure for submitting review/ what to base against (assuming master/head/etc) / etc |
| 16:22.37 | scv | etc etc etc |
| 16:22.46 | scv | this looks like what i needed |
| 16:22.47 | scv | thanks file |
| 16:25.24 | file | yw |
| 16:39.59 | scv | yep, patch out the q.850 and it works like a charm |
| 16:40.09 | scv | just tested against a yealink w52p and a gs gxp2130 |
| 16:44.39 | WIMPy | didn't get the story. You don't get missed calls when the header is present? |
| 16:47.02 | scv | WIMPy: grandstream and yealink sip stacks suck and can't handle multiple Reason headers |
| 16:47.25 | scv | if SIP and q.850 reasons are both present, they ignore both |
| 16:47.37 | WIMPy | Yeah, I got it that far. But what's happening? |
| 16:48.18 | WIMPy | Providers often aren't much better. |
| 16:48.27 | scv | presumably they only check for a single Reason: header and the Q.850 one is sent first |
| 16:48.31 | scv | and they don't check against that |
| 16:48.44 | WIMPy | I've kearned that either you get to talk to someone. Everything else is just a general call failure. |
| 16:48.50 | scv | not really 100% sure, i don't feel like firing up IDA just to pick at GS code some more |
| 17:10.17 | *** mode/#asterisk [+b *!*@unaffiliated/hojuruku] by newtonr |
| 17:11.52 | *** kick/#asterisk [hojuruku!RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-pawuiulhigzsgxaq] by newtonr (You continued violating the community code of conduct after being warned twice. Not cool.) |
| 17:15.11 | *** join/#asterisk TECFALL (~dschuett@38.121.113.66) |
| 17:15.25 | TECFALL | why won't my Cisco 7942 register with asterisk? http://pastie.org/10901317 |
| 17:16.26 | *** join/#asterisk pchero (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 17:16.35 | WIMPy | See. That's what you get when you moan about the quality of Grandstream. Someone comes with a Cisco 79xx. |
| 17:17.12 | malcolmd | hah |
| 17:18.53 | TECFALL | WIMPy: I would love a grandstream |
| 17:20.48 | scv | haha |
| 17:21.21 | scv | honestly they've improved considerably over the last 4 years |
| 17:22.03 | WIMPy | I already loved that old GS I got hold of recently. |
| 17:22.15 | scv | what model |
| 17:22.39 | WIMPy | GXP2000 |
| 17:22.45 | scv | ah classic :) |
| 17:22.48 | scv | very fast boot time |
| 17:22.56 | [TK]D-Fender | BarbieTone Deluxe |
| 17:22.59 | scv | i actually just um |
| 17:23.04 | scv | tossed one of those |
| 17:23.07 | scv | a few days ago |
| 17:23.20 | WIMPy | Really good call handling. The best I've seen on any IP phone so far. |
| 17:23.35 | [TK]D-Fender | I'm running most of my 11-year old Polycom IP600's still. Rock solid. |
| 17:24.10 | [TK]D-Fender | WIMPy, Considering Polycom's join/split, multiple calls/key + key spanning I haven't seen anything that matches it... |
| 17:24.30 | WIMPy | Maybe. But that GS would be something wich would work for users. |
| 17:24.31 | [TK]D-Fender | And that's in an 11 year+ old model |
| 17:24.49 | TECFALL | So, i guess i am just SOL with my 79xx? |
| 17:25.20 | WIMPy | People have made them work. But expect to invest a few days. |
| 17:25.30 | [TK]D-Fender | TECFALL, You asked us why it won't register... and you only showed us a peer. |
| 17:25.58 | TECFALL | [TK]D-Fender: asterisk -rv isn't showing it even attempting to register |
| 17:26.00 | [TK]D-Fender | TECFALL, You don't show your mechanic a brochure for your car and then ask why it crashed. |
| 17:26.24 | [TK]D-Fender | SIP DEBUG <- If you're not enabling and looking for this .. then it isn't qualified as looking. |
| 17:26.57 | [TK]D-Fender | "sip set debug on" |
| 17:27.10 | scv | WIMPy: the new GXP2130 is pretty decent for an end user phone |
| 17:27.42 | scv | there were numerous issues early on after release but they're pretty solid these days |
| 17:30.33 | TECFALL | [TK]D-Fender I enabled sip debug and I am not seeing any traffic from the phone. |
| 17:31.28 | [TK]D-Fender | Then either you configured the phone wrong or you have a networking issue of some kind (firewall inbetween, routing, etc) |
| 17:33.59 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@154.73.32.15) |
| 17:37.08 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@137.158.23.63) |
| 18:03.13 | *** join/#asterisk zway (~zway@74.203.105.194) |
| 18:23.22 | *** join/#asterisk plasmoduck (~cjg@103.251.66.171) |
| 18:32.59 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@2a02:1811:c52c:1700:9896:95e1:ba38:219e) |
| 18:46.51 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@96.81.150.137) |
| 18:52.37 | *** join/#asterisk KerioMorgan (~Adium@gw-us.kerio.com) |
| 19:00.34 | *** join/#asterisk makowals (~makowals@adsl-84-227-186-141.adslplus.ch) |
| 19:28.25 | *** join/#asterisk DivideBy0 (~DivideBy0@unaffiliated/divideby0x0) |
| 19:29.11 | *** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@chello080109194026.3.graz.surfer.at) |
| 20:11.29 | *** join/#asterisk TECFALL (~dschuett@38.121.113.66) |
| 20:11.37 | TECFALL | does this ring a bell to anyone? Purely numeric hostname (230), and not a peer--rejecting! |
| 20:11.48 | TECFALL | 230 is the number i am dialing |
| 20:12.16 | [TK]D-Fender | and there is no peer defined for it |
| 20:12.23 | [TK]D-Fender | and t isn't a hostname. Or IP. |
| 20:13.35 | TECFALL | well _2XX is defined in the outbound context of my calling extension. |
| 20:13.46 | [TK]D-Fender | no |
| 20:13.54 | [TK]D-Fender | that is a DIAL tthat is placing a call. |
| 20:14.05 | [TK]D-Fender | this is not a "dilaplan extenion not found" error |
| 20:14.22 | [TK]D-Fender | neesd a new keyboard at work... |
| 20:14.54 | TECFALL | I |
| 20:15.05 | [TK]D-Fender | ~pb |
| 20:15.09 | infobot | A "pastebin" is a web-based service where you should paste anything over 3 lines so you don't flood the channel. Here are links to a few: http://www.pastebin.com, http://pastebin.ca, http://channels.debian.net/paste, http://paste.lisp.org, http://bin.cakephp.org/; or install pastebinit with yum or aptitude. |
| 20:15.20 | [TK]D-Fender | ^^^ |
| 20:15.21 | [TK]D-Fender | Show the call so we can point it out to you... |
| 20:15.40 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 20:16.06 | TECFALL | shouldn't a NoOp print out before my _2XX rule? so I know for sure it is getting into my outbound context? |
| 20:16.17 | [TK]D-Fender | Show the call... |
| 20:16.32 | [TK]D-Fender | NoOp doesn't "just printt". Your dialplan flows through the steps as you defined them.... |
| 20:16.44 | [TK]D-Fender | Show the call |
| 20:16.49 | [TK]D-Fender | And the actual dialplan |
| 20:20.22 | TECFALL | [TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/vRY2U7ru |
| 20:20.48 | [TK]D-Fender | "core set verbose 10" |
| 20:20.48 | [TK]D-Fender | ^ |
| 20:20.52 | [TK]D-Fender | and show another call |
| 20:20.59 | [TK]D-Fender | You're not looking at the actual dialplan flow.... |
| 20:23.09 | TECFALL | http://pastebin.com/xN10Ni1G |
| 20:23.49 | TECFALL | ignore that last paste |
| 20:24.50 | TECFALL | ok, i see it now. how do i get it to show the dialplan flow by default without all the other info clutering up the console? |
| 20:25.20 | [TK]D-Fender | just show the call |
| 20:25.34 | [TK]D-Fender | Time is very short here... |
| 20:25.55 | TECFALL | I see the problem now that I can see the dialplan flow |
| 20:26.12 | TECFALL | i guess it was a matter of setting verbose to 10 |
| 20:26.16 | [TK]D-Fender | As I said, you're doing a Dial() for a device you have not defined. |
| 20:26.36 | TECFALL | Well, yes. It was routing to the wrong location. |
| 20:26.50 | [TK]D-Fender | You're dialing... exactly what you told it to... |
| 20:26.55 | TECFALL | i know |
| 20:27.03 | [TK]D-Fender | which is not a valid devicename |
| 20:27.25 | [TK]D-Fender | That's the problem when using patterns whose full range of possibilities doesn't always work out for you |
| 20:29.35 | [TK]D-Fender | And ... checkout time, BBIAB |
| 20:30.10 | *** join/#asterisk igcewieling (~ewieling@ip98-170-211-145.pn.at.cox.net) |
| 20:30.58 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 20:32.38 | igcewieling | https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Call+Identifier+Logging Is there any way to get the Call Identifier for a call in the dialplan? |
| 20:34.51 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 20:51.43 | TECFALL | ok, so now I am having this problem: http://pastebin.com/fc0QwQCJ |
| 20:55.03 | igcewieling | TECFALL: what version of asterisk? |
| 20:55.40 | TECFALL | igcewieling: 13.9.1 |
| 20:56.07 | igcewieling | I'm only familiar with 11 |
| 20:57.37 | *** join/#asterisk RichiePBX (~RichiePBX@ppp203-122-193-29.static.internode.on.net) |
| 20:57.54 | igcewieling | you don't have an extension 249 in the [outbound] context? |
| 20:58.49 | TECFALL | igcewieling: I am dialing 230 which is in outbound and the context of the phone 249 which i'm dialing from is set to outbound |
| 21:02.25 | RichiePBX | Hey guys having issues with no audio and call dropping on my extensions. Setup: Elastix on the cloud, remote extensions using Cisco 7970. Here is a debug log dump: http://pastebin.com/03evrB6d any assistance would be appreciated. |
| 21:03.00 | rmudgett | igcewieling: Dialplan has no access to the callid. A patch would be needed to add that feature. The best candidate would be to make the CHANNEL function access the callid. |
| 21:03.18 | igcewieling | rmudgett: thanks. |
| 21:03.49 | *** part/#asterisk igcewieling (~ewieling@ip98-170-211-145.pn.at.cox.net) |
| 21:05.49 | WIMPy | Is QUEUE_VARIABLES(QUEUEHOLDTIME) the same as the expected wait time announced to the caller (if enabled)? |
| 21:29.33 | RichiePBX | Hey guys having issues with no audio and call dropping on my extensions. Setup: Elastix on the cloud, remote extensions using Cisco 7970. Here is a debug log dump: http://pastebin.com/03evrB6d any assistance would be appreciated. |
| 21:38.18 | scv | you have a firewall problem somewhere |
| 21:47.05 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 21:53.55 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 21:54.45 | Samot | So many things are already wrong with that. |
| 22:09.15 | *** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@chello080109194026.3.graz.surfer.at) |
| 22:23.43 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@198-48-218-90.cpe.pppoe.ca) |
| 22:31.28 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 22:39.59 | *** join/#asterisk L337gamer21 (~yaaic@2601:281:c400:a300:f006:c12b:ea89:b34d) |
| 22:43.09 | *** join/#asterisk Deeewayne (~dwayne@c-68-32-120-188.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
| 22:43.09 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 23:12.16 | *** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 23:15.22 | absentbird | I am getting an error when I try to call a DAHDI channel: Unable to create channel of type 'DAHDI' (cause 34 - Circuit/channel congestion) |
| 23:21.06 | *** join/#asterisk justdave_ (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |
| 23:29.46 | *** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-tqqsexwdtnurayit) |
| 23:51.32 | *** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave) |