| 00:05.49 | *** join/#asterisk celer (~celer@pc1.robertwaltersjp-unet.ocn.ne.jp) |
| 00:06.07 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@96.81.150.137) |
| 00:12.38 | *** join/#asterisk fstd_ (~fstd@unaffiliated/fisted) |
| 00:37.37 | *** join/#asterisk SpaceInvaders (~SpaceInva@cpe-172-73-70-53.carolina.res.rr.com) |
| 00:38.49 | SpaceInvaders | Hey I'm using the Fedora 23 build and I have posted a question in #fedora. I used dnf install asterisk (on Fedora 23) and noticed there's no /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/chan_sip.so -- is there an easy fix or does that mean I have to DL code and compile? |
| 00:39.28 | SpaceInvaders | ok its in asterisk-sip |
| 00:39.32 | SpaceInvaders | question answered |
| 00:41.38 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 00:56.18 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 01:12.12 | *** join/#asterisk u0m3 (~u0m3@84.232.219.206) |
| 03:06.47 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 04:20.16 | *** join/#asterisk raspberrypifan (~raspberry@cpe-69-204-230-28.nyc.res.rr.com) |
| 04:21.16 | raspberrypifan | hey all, very stupid question but something that im being told by the people im working with |
| 04:21.20 | raspberrypifan | apparently sip peer to peer is directly via an ip address with no user name or password |
| 04:22.33 | Mango45 | Maybe it uses a username and password, maybe it doesn't. |
| 04:22.53 | Mango45 | It could use user/pass, IP authentication, or no authentication at all. |
| 04:24.25 | raspberrypifan | how would it use no authentication |
| 04:26.52 | Mango45 | The INVITE would be accepted without 401 UNAUTHORIZED. |
| 04:29.11 | raspberrypifan | well i learnt something |
| 04:29.14 | raspberrypifan | i had no idea you cold do that |
| 04:29.18 | Mango45 | :) |
| 04:29.27 | raspberrypifan | so for ip authentication nothing really changes then |
| 04:29.38 | raspberrypifan | its still the basic sip conf |
| 04:30.01 | raspberrypifan | how would i add it in the conf file would it start with a user name type thing in brackets |
| 04:30.38 | Mango45 | for IP authentication you set host= in sip.conf. For password authentication, use host=dynamic and secret= |
| 04:30.59 | raspberrypifan | but you would still set it up as with an extension user name |
| 04:31.38 | Mango45 | Extensions and usernames are two different things. |
| 04:31.45 | Mango45 | They can be the same, but do not have to be. |
| 04:32.24 | raspberrypifan | well when i add something to sip.conf it starts with [xxxx] that would be a username |
| 04:32.25 | raspberrypifan | right |
| 04:32.25 | Mango45 | For example |
| 04:32.30 | Mango45 | Right. |
| 04:32.36 | Mango45 | [raspberrypifan] |
| 04:32.38 | Mango45 | type=peer |
| 04:32.58 | Mango45 | context=some_context_name |
| 04:33.11 | Mango45 | defaultuser=raspberrypifan |
| 04:33.15 | Mango45 | host=192.168.1.2 |
| 04:33.24 | Mango45 | port=35060 |
| 04:33.42 | Mango45 | I forget why you need defaultuser at the moment. |
| 04:33.44 | Mango45 | Googles |
| 04:34.27 | Mango45 | Note: In most cases, there is no need to set the defaultuser= option. The name of the device is the name within the square brackets above the configuration section. |
| 04:36.09 | Mango45 | How about that. I've been using it all this time for no reason. |
| 04:37.34 | raspberrypifan | in this case the host would just be the ip of the wholesale carrier |
| 04:37.42 | raspberrypifan | and that would be it, authentification by ip? |
| 04:37.52 | raspberrypifan | if they give me a block of ip can i do the / notation |
| 04:38.47 | Mango45 | No, it must be an IP address, not a subnet. |
| 04:39.13 | Mango45 | Generally the carrier or service provider will provide you with the proper information to use for sip.conf, that works with their services. |
| 04:39.48 | raspberrypifan | well its backward it would seem |
| 04:39.55 | raspberrypifan | they sent the ppl i work with |
| 04:40.01 | raspberrypifan | a deployment sheet with black spots to add information |
| 04:40.25 | raspberrypifan | i feel rather bad as what im doing is basically putting wires together with tape |
| 04:40.34 | raspberrypifan | so forgive me if i should rather confused |
| 04:40.39 | drmessano | I they ASKED for information, I would presume it's for an ACL on their end |
| 04:40.46 | drmessano | If* |
| 04:42.52 | raspberrypifan | well i sent them a username password and ip address to connect to my asterisk box |
| 04:43.04 | raspberrypifan | but apparently they do ip authenticacion which i dont know about and thats it |
| 04:43.19 | raspberrypifan | it doesnt really ask for more information besides the ip address and the protocols we are using |
| 04:43.33 | drmessano | Sure.. they validate your IP and thats it |
| 04:44.03 | raspberrypifan | i gotta say i must have skipped the part of the asterisk book where it explains ip authentication |
| 04:44.15 | drmessano | Theres nothing to explain |
| 04:44.28 | drmessano | They allow calls from ONE IP or a range of IPs |
| 04:44.34 | drmessano | They send the calls to ONE IP |
| 04:44.38 | drmessano | Done |
| 04:44.50 | raspberrypifan | i just had thought you always had to have a user name and password to connect |
| 04:44.54 | raspberrypifan | it seemed like the normal thing |
| 04:45.00 | drmessano | Well.. no |
| 04:45.18 | drmessano | Your provider will never authenticate to your asterisk box |
| 04:45.26 | drmessano | ITSPs do not auth |
| 04:45.41 | drmessano | With IP authentication, they are just trusting an IP for your calls |
| 04:45.48 | raspberrypifan | ah i see |
| 04:46.03 | raspberrypifan | well its backwards in this case |
| 04:46.06 | raspberrypifan | im selling them acces |
| 04:46.08 | raspberrypifan | to the pstn |
| 04:46.18 | drmessano | ok |
| 04:47.46 | raspberrypifan | but i suppose the principal is the same |
| 04:48.18 | raspberrypifan | its rather exciting to me though, to think u can just use an ip to get call in |
| 04:50.12 | raspberrypifan | so why is it that sip robots that try to access my system always seem to be doing so with a username and password, shouldnt htey just be trying to run a bunch of ips through the box |
| 04:50.42 | Mango45 | You need a firewall if sip robots are attempting to access your system. |
| 04:50.57 | raspberrypifan | yea i added the ip to the iptables |
| 04:51.00 | drmessano | If their IP doesn't match the peer configuration, it's invalid |
| 04:51.11 | drmessano | You can't just arbitrarily change your IP |
| 04:51.30 | raspberrypifan | dont they have a whole block of ips to play wit htho |
| 04:51.39 | raspberrypifan | i would imagine these robots are run by powerful ppl |
| 04:51.44 | raspberrypifan | with lots of ips |
| 04:52.04 | drmessano | Sure.. But are any of them the SAME as the host entry in your peer? NO |
| 04:52.20 | drmessano | They can have millions of IPs.. they have to have one that matches |
| 04:52.23 | drmessano | IPs are unique |
| 04:52.44 | drmessano | You dont just plug one in and boom, spoof |
| 04:53.21 | raspberrypifan | i mean obviously i know ips are unique |
| 04:53.51 | raspberrypifan | but who knows what advanced technology and exploits these bots might have, in my mind anyway |
| 04:54.19 | drmessano | "Who knows" is not science.. There is science behind how IP networking works |
| 04:54.38 | drmessano | and no, you can't just magic your way into using the same IP |
| 04:54.44 | raspberrypifan | im not talking about the ip part more on the asterisk side of the authentication |
| 04:54.53 | drmessano | ..... |
| 04:55.10 | drmessano | This is precisely what I am talking about |
| 04:55.18 | drmessano | What do you think IP based authentication is based on? |
| 04:55.22 | drmessano | *IP* |
| 04:55.27 | raspberrypifan | yes i get that |
| 04:55.41 | drmessano | What do think that host= line in your peer config means? |
| 04:56.09 | raspberrypifan | the person who seats me at my table in the restaurant |
| 04:56.25 | drmessano | Then this is all completely lost on you |
| 04:56.35 | drmessano | Peer matching is a basic Asterisk concept |
| 04:58.14 | raspberrypifan | i must have skipped the whole asterisk book then |
| 04:58.24 | raspberrypifan | though im sure i read it |
| 04:58.42 | drmessano | You cant just write some script that tells a remote Asterisk box "Hey Dude my calls are coming from IP XX.XX.XX.XX, no really.. " they have to be ACTUALLY coming from that IP |
| 04:59.15 | drmessano | Which is why those calls, on a properly configured box, fail miserably |
| 04:59.47 | raspberrypifan | i see, so why dont we just generally use ip authentication without user/pass |
| 04:59.59 | drmessano | We do |
| 05:00.38 | raspberrypifan | most of the stuff ive seen on the non big commercial side is user/pass |
| 05:00.43 | raspberrypifan | sometimes i have seen they add the ip |
| 05:00.45 | raspberrypifan | to be extra sure |
| 05:00.46 | drmessano | Its a helluva lot more secure than using registration nonsense |
| 05:00.58 | raspberrypifan | but i hadnt seen it without any user/pass |
| 05:01.00 | raspberrypifan | until right now |
| 05:01.02 | drmessano | Most larger ITSPs dont allow registration |
| 05:01.57 | raspberrypifan | i gotta say in these last 10 minutes my mind has been blown |
| 05:03.22 | raspberrypifan | while were at it, what is radius supposed to do |
| 05:03.26 | raspberrypifan | i was told that they use that for billing |
| 05:04.23 | drmessano | Depends on how its implemented.. RADIUS is a pretty general protocol used for many things. |
| 05:04.48 | raspberrypifan | yea like i said im basically working on a business being done in a shack in the middle of the jungle |
| 05:04.57 | raspberrypifan | run by someone who knows only buzz words |
| 05:05.18 | raspberrypifan | this person kept talkign about peer to peer as being ip based authentication |
| 05:05.57 | drmessano | Thats not untrue |
| 05:06.49 | raspberrypifan | but thats very generally, peer to peer can also be with user/password. Also does user/pass auth have some specific name |
| 05:13.57 | raspberrypifan | drmessano: i do appreciate your advice tho |
| 05:15.01 | drmessano | If you read the book, I would suggest a refresher. All of this is well-covered in the book. This really is essential knowledge to possess. |
| 05:15.16 | drmessano | Important, even |
| 05:17.02 | raspberrypifan | possibly essential |
| 05:17.03 | raspberrypifan | it seems |
| 05:22.21 | raspberrypifan | so how is it that radius and billing could be connected drmessano |
| 05:22.28 | raspberrypifan | and speaking of that an recommendation for asterisk billing |
| 05:29.32 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 05:33.03 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:02.57 | *** join/#asterisk raspberrypifan (~raspberry@cpe-69-204-230-28.nyc.res.rr.com) |
| 06:11.47 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 06:12.44 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 06:13.51 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 06:23.33 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:46.38 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@d5152CCD8.static.telenet.be) |
| 06:50.27 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 06:53.07 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe (~CeBe@a81-14-235-90.net-htp.de) |
| 07:04.56 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 07:30.12 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:34.01 | *** join/#asterisk mirela666 (~mirkob@2a00:1950:400:0:dde5:e7d4:3fc3:db1c) |
| 08:08.15 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-35-201.wall.uls.co.za) |
| 08:24.40 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net) |
| 08:26.59 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net) |
| 08:28.35 | *** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-41-127.rn.hr.cox.net) |
| 09:05.40 | *** join/#asterisk tsaf (~pastos@static.175.201.47.78.clients.your-server.de) |
| 09:26.02 | *** join/#asterisk ronybeck (~ronybeck@46.140.63.234) |
| 10:25.15 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.120) |
| 10:38.22 | *** join/#asterisk Penguin (~xwQ5kwYl6@20264.odci.gov.united-states.rltk.us) |
| 10:39.43 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 10:48.08 | *** join/#asterisk Haris (~haris@unaffiliated/haris) |
| 11:08.00 | *** join/#asterisk bounceman (~bounceman@185.32.9.250) |
| 11:08.12 | bounceman | Hey, what do you think about this UDP Recv-Q? jkroon http://codepad.org/0cB5Vp6E |
| 11:08.30 | bounceman | Aw he is not here. |
| 11:11.05 | bounceman | Any wizard here that could give any assistance? |
| 11:13.48 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-35-201.wall.uls.co.za) |
| 11:18.43 | bounceman | jkroon, Ive been looking for you |
| 11:18.51 | bounceman | From todays observations http://codepad.org/0cB5Vp6E |
| 11:19.10 | bounceman | Major locking there |
| 11:21.39 | jkroon | bounceman, http://downloads.uls.co.za/patches/asterisk-11.5.0-sip_profile.diff |
| 11:22.44 | jkroon | it's basically a hard-coded performance analyser. |
| 11:23.31 | jkroon | patch chan_sip with it and you'll get "Processing of SIP packet took %ldus by stage %s\n" NOTICE values logged whenever a packet takes longer than handle_request_max_time us. |
| 11:23.44 | jkroon | it's what I used to track the REGISTER => astdb problem. |
| 11:24.02 | bounceman | Do I have to rebuild asterisk? |
| 11:24.09 | jkroon | sorry for the fugglyness factor of the code. |
| 11:24.10 | jkroon | yes. |
| 11:24.58 | jkroon | you can nuke the last hunk which always log the time taken to process a SIP packet to VERBOSE (which really aught to be debug but I was lazy) |
| 11:25.24 | jkroon | i'm betting you'll find that it's only REGISTER frames that hit that. |
| 11:26.07 | jkroon | other users have stated that DNS could be a problem too, the reality is that I could not find any DNS lookups in any of the paths dealing with *incoming* SIP frames. |
| 11:27.56 | jkroon | tracking the fact that it's astdb causing the problem I tracked by manual code inspection, don't remember the details, just remember that it was a very, very long night. |
| 11:32.36 | bounceman | I wouldn't mind to log the time of all packages |
| 11:33.24 | bounceman | Is you patch compatible with asterisk 11.16? |
| 11:37.01 | jkroon | if it applies it is yes, if not i think it's time to try and take it mainline. |
| 11:37.14 | jkroon | should be though ... |
| 12:01.23 | bounceman | Well I have loaded it now |
| 12:01.26 | bounceman | time for testing... |
| 12:03.33 | bounceman | jkroon: does this script (unmodified) output timers for all sip packages? |
| 12:03.37 | bounceman | I mean how can I verify that it is working |
| 12:03.51 | jkroon | If I recall yes. |
| 12:04.21 | jkroon | + handle_request_do_logtime(); => ast_verbose("Processing of SIP packet (%s) took %ldus.\n",... so yes it should. |
| 12:05.11 | bounceman | Processing of SIP packet (SIP/2.0) took 58us. |
| 12:05.12 | bounceman | whoho |
| 12:07.16 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 12:10.31 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~Joe@216-191-106-165.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 12:12.47 | bounceman | this is good sh*t jkroon |
| 12:15.06 | jkroon | hahahaha |
| 12:15.12 | jkroon | something you reckon needs to go mainline? |
| 12:15.39 | bounceman | Yes, it is obvious that it is a good tool |
| 12:16.02 | bounceman | Atleast submit it for comment |
| 12:16.04 | jkroon | obviously the "longer than" portion needs some work in order to be configurable (ie, the 100ms currently used) should become a global config option. |
| 12:16.15 | jkroon | it needs some work prior to that. |
| 12:30.01 | bounceman | jkroon: on what process times should we start to lift one eyebrow? |
| 12:31.12 | jkroon | how many SIP clients do you have? |
| 12:31.47 | jkroon | from ~150ms best case |
| 12:32.01 | jkroon | so REGISTER frames in my case took around 150ms before that astdb change. |
| 12:32.05 | jkroon | now they're <1ms. |
| 12:32.47 | jkroon | most other frames were dealt with sub 100ms, so I'd say anything over 1ms is cause for great concern. |
| 12:32.59 | jkroon | (other than REGISTERs currently) |
| 12:33.02 | bounceman | Ok, so I'll aim for under 100ms then |
| 12:33.12 | jkroon | 100us :) |
| 12:33.16 | bounceman | Ok.. |
| 12:33.37 | jkroon | even with astdb on ramfs they're still relatively slow (750us) but still faster than 1ms. |
| 12:35.45 | bounceman | Only registers that are affected by astdb? |
| 12:35.49 | bounceman | what about notify? |
| 12:42.37 | rbeer | Hi, is anyone else having issues with taskprocessors in asterisk 13? |
| 12:44.06 | rbeer | I've got a issue logged under https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26145 which has been opened |
| 12:50.02 | jkroon | bounceman, NOTIFY is outbound, not a problem. |
| 12:50.09 | jkroon | but no, afaik only REGISTER is affected. |
| 12:51.23 | bounceman | taps jkroon on the back |
| 12:59.36 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@178-117-109-135.access.telenet.be) |
| 13:05.09 | *** join/#asterisk SunTsu (miyamoto@unaffiliated/suntsu) |
| 13:06.33 | *** join/#asterisk SeiGGy (~zway@74.203.105.194) |
| 13:10.24 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@d5152CCD8.static.telenet.be) |
| 13:18.36 | *** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@165.255.59.184) |
| 13:19.04 | jkroon | bounceman, i prefer creates of beer :p |
| 13:23.01 | bounceman | jkroon: I do not really see any REGISTER requests on the time when this occurs |
| 13:23.20 | *** join/#asterisk dpecka (~jdoe@static-84-42-228-122.net.upcbroadband.cz) |
| 13:23.22 | dpecka | hello |
| 13:24.58 | dpecka | I have one simple Q: ... I'm building asterisk on solaris 11 and it is still bitching, that libjansson is missing whilst I have built it already and PKG_CONFIG_PATH= points to where (/opt/fax/libjansson/lib/pkgconfig) libjansson.pc is |
| 13:25.02 | dpecka | is it some bug ? |
| 13:33.03 | jkroon | bounceman, interesting. if you can grep out all the logged packet times and pastebin that I'd be really interested to look at the timings. |
| 13:33.30 | bounceman | oh, we havent implemented that fix yet in the production. We will do it tomorrow morning. |
| 13:33.33 | bounceman | We have only tested it |
| 13:34.39 | dpecka | I'd like to ask for one more (meta-)Q: is actually here somebody that could confirm/deny if it is possible to run asterisk on solaris ? |
| 13:36.04 | WIMPy | dpecka: As long as you don't plan to use interface cards, why wouldn't you? |
| 13:37.05 | dpecka | WIMPy: well, I had to fix several ./configure things because there weren't any ifdefs that could indicate, that there is real support for solaris |
| 13:37.14 | *** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:8016:3e4e:512b:70f9) |
| 13:37.20 | dpecka | also I'm getting a lot of nasty warnings while building it |
| 13:38.17 | dpecka | WIMPy: but okay, it was meta-Q |
| 13:59.36 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-jwarykswtstldbbv) |
| 14:06.46 | *** join/#asterisk putnopvut (putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:06.46 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:10.14 | *** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 14:10.15 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 14:12.46 | jkroon | bounceman, the patch? |
| 14:12.52 | bounceman | Yes |
| 14:28.08 | *** part/#asterisk Haris (~haris@unaffiliated/haris) |
| 14:39.37 | *** join/#asterisk raspberrypifan (~raspberry@cpe-69-204-230-28.nyc.res.rr.com) |
| 14:40.17 | *** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@165.255.59.184) |
| 14:49.11 | *** join/#asterisk slav3_sergal (~frankthet@unaffiliated/slav3-kitten/x-0866809) |
| 15:00.26 | *** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-gqbzjvivofslngqm) |
| 15:02.23 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 15:06.56 | *** join/#asterisk happy-dude (uid62780@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-diwscblbmplmxmce) |
| 15:10.27 | *** join/#asterisk AviiNL (~AviiNL@185.21.52.255) |
| 15:27.37 | *** join/#asterisk newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-mrpfvywtvymbnntj) |
| 15:27.37 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 16:11.45 | dpecka | WIMPy: hmm ... nope, it won't work (at least easily) |
| 16:12.06 | dpecka | asterisk is completely untested on solaris |
| 16:12.13 | WIMPy | Doesn't compile? |
| 16:12.51 | dpecka | WIMPy: yes but because of functions that doesn't exist here .... it's straight away clear that nobody with asterisk 11+ tested it on solaris |
| 16:13.30 | WIMPy | certainly didn't. |
| 16:13.31 | *** join/#asterisk BBone_ (~Thunderbi@maila.fraserwoodindustries.com) |
| 16:13.49 | WIMPy | But then I have interface cards in all but one box. |
| 16:14.44 | dpecka | well, there are things that won't work in base part like uuid.c or logger.c |
| 16:15.30 | WIMPy | Have you tried faking to be BSD as a base? |
| 16:16.18 | dpecka | WIMPy: it's not enwrapped in ifdefs or so |
| 16:16.31 | dpecka | I'm already trying to patch sources |
| 16:16.47 | dpecka | thanks for hint with bsd but simply said, it won't work |
| 16:17.30 | WIMPy | And AFAIK it works with OSX. |
| 16:18.14 | dpecka | WIMPy: I dare to say it won't, because it uses *exclusive stupid glibc functions that doesn't exist anywhere but only in glibc |
| 16:18.39 | dpecka | for example uuid_unparse_lower |
| 16:19.13 | dpecka | WIMPy: btw, I was checking 1.8, it should work because these `improvements' were been added later on |
| 16:20.08 | WIMPy | If you're working on msking it work, I suggest you join #asterisk-dev |
| 16:22.19 | dpecka | http://forums.asterisk.org/viewtopic.php?p=207182 |
| 16:22.22 | dpecka | JFYI ^^ |
| 16:23.02 | dpecka | I have both (+ few more) issues .... I've already resolved the second one |
| 16:29.56 | dpecka | WIMPy: latest 11 LTS looks finer |
| 16:31.08 | dpecka | at least, I hate that asterisk-class software is totally untested on such a usual platform like solaris .... it's just glibc-hardcoded and it's caused by that a less-experienced ppl are allowed to add inane features |
| 16:32.30 | WIMPy | Welcome to the post progress ages. |
| 16:37.54 | dpecka | WIMPy: good news is, that because I (we) have to build it,, we'll be able to patch it (most likely) and share the patch .... I'm fortunatelly backed up by several skilled programmers |
| 16:38.16 | WIMPy | I'm eradin over there as well :-) |
| 16:38.47 | WIMPy | Why do you "have to"? And which version are you going to make work? |
| 16:39.41 | dpecka | I started with 13 but now - as a part of workaround - picked up 11 and it looks better by miles |
| 16:42.42 | WIMPy | And why do you want ot run in on Solaris? |
| 16:42.59 | dpecka | because we have only solaris environment |
| 16:48.32 | *** join/#asterisk drale2k (~drale2k@46.101.230.32) |
| 16:53.31 | mub | like 99% of people use rhel or debian |
| 16:53.45 | mub | something based on rhel or debian* |
| 16:55.44 | drmessano | You left off a few 9's |
| 16:55.58 | drmessano | 1 out of 100 is generous |
| 16:56.18 | WIMPy | Like 99.9% of all smartphones a iPhones? |
| 16:56.30 | WIMPy | are |
| 16:56.37 | drmessano | Are they? |
| 16:56.59 | WIMPy | Don't you believe? |
| 16:57.15 | drmessano | Why would I believe that? |
| 16:57.30 | dpecka | mub: 99% of ppl use debian ? that was a point to my asterisk-couldn't-be-built-on-solaris rant ? |
| 16:58.08 | WIMPy | It's all just "merketing trouths". |
| 16:59.19 | drmessano | Hm ok |
| 16:59.29 | drmessano | Whatever that means |
| 16:59.49 | WIMPy | To many people it means everything. |
| 17:03.45 | *** join/#asterisk pchero (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 17:04.36 | *** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@2a02:fe0:c321:9d80:1f1:201e:6ce6:4d99) |
| 17:05.23 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 17:09.07 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@modemcable002.114-70-69.static.videotron.ca) |
| 17:12.27 | mub | I did not read your rant, I just jumped into the conversation randomly. |
| 17:12.55 | mub | I'm merely stating that if you use an OS that many many people use, you'll have less problems |
| 17:13.01 | mub | and more support |
| 17:13.28 | WIMPy | That does not match my experience. |
| 17:13.53 | mub | WIMPy: What do you run asterisk on? |
| 17:14.08 | WIMPy | Slackware |
| 17:14.14 | mub | dang |
| 17:14.33 | drmessano | Im not sure about "Less problems" or if that's even worth stating... but 100% on "More support". If you're a newb, that's a vitally and often overlooked aspect |
| 17:15.32 | WIMPy | Maybe for noob questions. Doesn't help if you'renot a noob, though. |
| 17:16.06 | drmessano | I would consider someone executing their first install to be a newb |
| 17:16.15 | drmessano | I think that's actually the definition of such |
| 17:16.25 | *** join/#asterisk ||cw (~chrisw@unaffiliated/cw/x-1182934) |
| 17:16.29 | drmessano | At least that's what Siri tells me |
| 17:16.42 | WIMPy | LOL |
| 17:34.08 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 17:36.46 | *** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@089144237156.atnat0046.highway.webapn.at) |
| 17:42.17 | *** join/#asterisk giesen (~ggiesen@2001:19f0:0:1019:5400:ff:fe25:bda6) |
| 17:47.59 | *** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou) |
| 17:58.10 | *** join/#asterisk ||cw (~chrisw@unaffiliated/cw/x-1182934) |
| 17:58.25 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@2a02:1811:c52c:1700:9448:c779:3791:f836) |
| 18:04.12 | *** join/#asterisk freebs (~freebs@unaffiliated/freebs) |
| 18:07.37 | *** join/#asterisk jameswf (uid27319@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kiyfxulguwshvtnc) |
| 18:20.52 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@2a02:1811:c52c:1700:640c:2099:ffc4:61b) |
| 18:20.55 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216-191-106-165.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 18:22.56 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216-191-106-165.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 18:27.25 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 18:41.06 | *** join/#asterisk malcolmd (malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 18:41.07 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 18:47.19 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-179-40-172.cust.bezeqint.net) |
| 18:47.32 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 19:12.57 | *** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@chello080109194026.3.graz.surfer.at) |
| 19:22.52 | *** join/#asterisk obelixBE (~obelix@2a02:1811:c52c:1700:640c:2099:ffc4:61b) |
| 19:25.39 | *** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@2a02:fe0:c321:9d80:91c8:3cbf:da24:9d54) |
| 19:31.08 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 19:34.37 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 19:44.35 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat56@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 19:45.16 | *** join/#asterisk piling (~piling@unaffiliated/piling) |
| 19:47.56 | *** join/#asterisk talntid (~talntid@173-160-189-58-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 19:55.53 | SpaceInvaders | Hi, how do I troubleshoot Wrong password in the CLI? I have secret=mypassword in sip.conf and entered the same password in the sip client. I'm pulling my hair out. I even changed the password to "test" in both places. Clearly I'm missing something. |
| 20:00.15 | talntid | I have this queue, with context=billing888, and when I put a call into the queue, I try to break out by pressing 1 (which I have an extension for in my billing888 context)... but when I press 1, there is no response from * at all..... does this functionality not work? http://pastebin.com/emHTNjyF -- Asterisk 13.6.0 |
| 20:24.00 | Kobaz | anyone have a bare minimum xml for grandstream |
| 20:29.22 | *** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou) |
| 20:38.38 | *** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~luckman21@unaffiliated/luckman212) |
| 20:43.07 | SpaceInvaders | ok so username= causes pw fails |
| 20:43.08 | SpaceInvaders | wow |
| 20:43.52 | SpaceInvaders | so much for instructions at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+sip.conf |
| 20:49.45 | *** join/#asterisk MaliutaLap (nikolai@unaffiliated/maliuta) |
| 20:49.56 | cresl1n | fromuser? |
| 20:50.14 | cresl1n | it really depends on the scenario though |
| 20:50.41 | *** join/#asterisk robsco (~robsco@cpc65125-nmal16-2-0-cust242.19-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 20:50.43 | SpaceInvaders | I was just following the instructions at voip-info and nothing worked until I took out the username= |
| 20:50.52 | SpaceInvaders | well I got password fails until I removed the username |
| 20:51.02 | SpaceInvaders | then my sip phone registered immediately |
| 20:51.30 | robsco | i've just installed v13 on Fedora 24, lots of errors about loading modules. is there a nice up-to-date howto for configuring a simple trunk? |
| 20:51.43 | SpaceInvaders | LOL |
| 20:52.02 | SpaceInvaders | I've been asking for fedora-specific instructions. I don't think they exist. You have to pick your way through it. |
| 20:52.12 | SpaceInvaders | It's ugly if you don't know asterisk fairly well |
| 20:52.14 | robsco | prob doesn't need to be fedora-specific? |
| 20:52.29 | SpaceInvaders | I was thinking more "from scratch" |
| 20:52.32 | robsco | i used to know it enough, had it working anyway, but now there's a ton of new config files appeared by default |
| 20:52.42 | robsco | just really need to copy and paste what i need from my old configs |
| 20:53.00 | SpaceInvaders | depends on what and how-old... there have been changes :) |
| 20:53.00 | robsco | no sip.conf for a start, is that a restructure or do i still need to create it? |
| 20:53.15 | SpaceInvaders | That's the first fedora-specific issue I ran into. |
| 20:53.28 | SpaceInvaders | I'm guessing you ran dnf install asterisk ? |
| 20:53.34 | robsco | yup |
| 20:53.40 | SpaceInvaders | dnf install asterisk-sip |
| 20:53.56 | robsco | upgraded from f19 to 24, asterisk broke, so removed and started again fresh |
| 20:54.06 | SpaceInvaders | that'll fix ur current problem |
| 20:54.17 | robsco | ah ha, thanks |
| 20:54.19 | SpaceInvaders | I'd suggest u run dnf search asterisk and carefully review *everything* |
| 20:54.25 | cresl1n | robsco: weird that there's no sip.conf |
| 20:54.32 | cresl1n | that should still exist, IMHO |
| 20:54.37 | SpaceInvaders | read up cresl1n :) |
| 20:54.43 | cresl1n | But I haven't used Fedora in a while :-) |
| 21:00.06 | robsco | do i need to worry about errors loading modules? and/or how do i remove the errors "Error loading module 'res_ari_channels.so'" |
| 21:00.30 | SpaceInvaders | read the modules section of docs and modules.conf |
| 21:00.35 | SpaceInvaders | /etc/asterisk/modules.conf |
| 21:01.09 | robsco | got it |
| 21:02.25 | *** join/#asterisk Alblasco1702 (~Alblasco1@ip5456b46b.speed.planet.nl) |
| 21:10.49 | robsco | what happened to the version numbers? from 1.2, 1.4, now 13.7? |
| 21:28.37 | *** join/#asterisk rp_ (~rp@185.9.7.195) |
| 21:31.19 | cresl1n | robsco: 1.2, 1.4. 1.6, 1.8, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
| 21:32.10 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 21:34.33 | *** join/#asterisk acidfu_ (~acidfoo@198-48-218-90.cpe.pppoe.ca) |
| 21:51.08 | talntid | I have this queue, with context=billing888, and when I put a call into the queue, I try to break out by pressing 1 (which I have an extension for in my billing888 context)... but when I press 1, there is no response from * at all..... does this functionality not work? http://pastebin.com/emHTNjyF -- Asterisk 13.6.0 |
| 21:52.11 | cresl1n | are you expecting the call to come out of the queue by virtue of them pressing one in a dialplan context with another extension called '1'? |
| 21:52.18 | WIMPy | cresl1n, robsco: More like 1.2, 1.4, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.8, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
| 21:52.24 | cresl1n | well |
| 21:52.25 | cresl1n | yeah |
| 21:53.23 | [TK]D-Fender | talntid, where's the CONFIGS? |
| 21:53.39 | talntid | [TK]D-Fender, they are served by CURL... |
| 21:53.46 | [TK]D-Fender | .... |
| 21:53.52 | talntid | but I can assure you, it is setting context=billing888 |
| 21:53.58 | [TK]D-Fender | Trust? |
| 21:54.01 | [TK]D-Fender | Are you INSANE? |
| 21:54.03 | talntid | haha |
| 21:54.05 | [TK]D-Fender | :) |
| 21:54.07 | [TK]D-Fender | NOT A CHANCE |
| 21:54.22 | [TK]D-Fender | "I did everything right!" - A wrong person. |
| 21:54.37 | [TK]D-Fender | ALL OF IT <- |
| 21:54.52 | talntid | cresl1n, I am expecting the call to come out of the the queue and go into the context specified |
| 21:55.03 | talntid | [TK]D-Fender, I could show you the HTTP result if tha thelps? :P |
| 21:55.22 | [TK]D-Fender | Show the configs for all of this |
| 21:55.40 | talntid | http://pastebin.com/8aWeBJJb |
| 21:56.04 | SpaceInvaders | When the docs say "mailbox number... usually corresponds with estension number" that means having a 1234 extension and mailbox 1234 is OK? |
| 21:56.20 | cresl1n | yes |
| 21:56.24 | SpaceInvaders | thanks! |
| 21:56.34 | WIMPy | They can be the same or ANYTHING. |
| 21:56.47 | talntid | http://pastebin.com/xqifB7vR |
| 21:56.58 | talntid | and, the call: http://pastebin.com/emHTNjyF |
| 21:57.03 | SpaceInvaders | thanks! |
| 21:57.10 | [TK]D-Fender | talntid, Your dialplan is a FAIL |
| 21:57.27 | WIMPy | And mailbox numbers is wroing already. They don't have to be numeric. |
| 21:58.17 | talntid | do'h |
| 22:03.00 | talntid | [TK]D-Fender, even as such, it is joining the queue, and i hear the recording, it just isn't breaking out |
| 22:03.34 | [TK]D-Fender | I'm not seeing proper configs yet... |
| 22:04.10 | talntid | you are asking me to give you things like queues.conf, but I am using curl to do the configs, so i posted the response to the curl request, which is what asterisk digests |
| 22:04.24 | talntid | unless i am misunderstanding you |
| 22:04.24 | [TK]D-Fender | <[TK]D-Fender> talntid, Your dialplan is a FAIL<---------------------------------------------- |
| 22:04.33 | [TK]D-Fender | WHERE IS THE CORRECTED DIALPLAN? |
| 22:04.54 | talntid | what is fail on it? it is working, it drops person into queue properly |
| 22:05.12 | talntid | I'm not trying to be difficult, I promise. Just not sure what is fail on it |
| 22:07.13 | talntid | I am officially a dumbass. |
| 22:08.32 | [TK]D-Fender | NEXT!@!@!!@!!!! (c) BKW |
| 22:08.34 | SpaceInvaders | [dumbass] exten => 1234,1,Dial (SIP/SpaceInvaders) |
| 22:09.39 | [TK]D-Fender | SpaceInvaders, You shouldn't have a space before the bracket there.... |
| 22:10.19 | SpaceInvaders | well... if you want to get techincal I think it would be |
| 22:10.28 | SpaceInvaders | [dumbass]\ exten => 1234,1,Dial(SIP/SpaceInvaders) |
| 22:10.44 | SpaceInvaders | that about get it? :) |
| 22:15.11 | [TK]D-Fender | I'd have assumed the line-break. |
| 22:15.17 | [TK]D-Fender | You get a pass on this one ;) |
| 22:15.22 | SpaceInvaders | :D |
| 22:15.31 | [TK]D-Fender | (assuming your actually have a device definition for that) |
| 22:15.42 | SpaceInvaders | I was assuming the definition :D |
| 22:15.44 | SpaceInvaders | LOL |
| 22:17.00 | SpaceInvaders | Hey, in config files does # also work? It seems to--I just realized I've been using it and ; is the standard. |
| 22:22.39 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.120) |
| 22:22.53 | *** join/#asterisk MaliutaLap (nikolai@unaffiliated/maliuta) |
| 22:26.46 | *** join/#asterisk xnaron (~xnaron@S0106b4750e5de3b2.ed.shawcable.net) |
| 22:31.14 | SpaceInvaders | OK I'm confused by The Definitive Guide.... it says "To allow users to dial 8500 to check their voicemail or modify their voicemail options, you would add an extension to the dialplan like this:" |
| 22:31.21 | SpaceInvaders | [Services]\ exten => *98,1,VoiceMailMain() |
| 22:31.41 | SpaceInvaders | and doesn't specify entries *anywhere* else..... |
| 22:32.38 | SpaceInvaders | That looks like users dialing *98 not 8500 and isn't at-least one additional entry required? |
| 22:33.15 | WIMPy | They need to have a mailbox, obviousely. |
| 22:33.34 | [TK]D-Fender | And it assumes they are in [default] |
| 22:35.53 | *** join/#asterisk klow (~textual@c-98-247-49-57.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 22:36.05 | SpaceInvaders | so when you say they need to have a mailbox.... from what I've read there is no "create mailbox" command. Does adding the VoiceMail() correctly into the dial plan cause mailbox creation once it's there and read from the conf? |
| 22:36.46 | WIMPy | No. You put them in voicemail.conf. |
| 22:37.21 | SpaceInvaders | I think I remember reading that... so much to keep up with! Thanks! |
| 22:48.05 | *** join/#asterisk adonnelly (~quassel@213.152.39.161) |
| 22:51.49 | *** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-jwarykswtstldbbv) |
| 23:49.38 | Gugge | SpaceInvaders: congratulations, you are one of the persons who understands what he reads :) |