| 00:24.17 | *** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 00:24.17 | *** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.20.0 (2018/03/15), Standard: 15.3.0 (2018/03/15); DAHDI: DAHDI-linux 2.11.1 (2016/03/01), DAHDI-tools 2.11.1 (2016/03/01); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22 -=- Logs: bit.ly/1s4AKKu |
| 00:50.55 | *** join/#asterisk syadnom (~syadnom@host-72-174-216-132.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) |
| 00:56.43 | syadnom | got a question google can't seem to answer. If I have a conference room and I force it to a HD codec like g722 or opus, will that make the conference room side any better when all connected parties are g.711? Obvious there is no improvement in quality from an individual remote caller but I'm wondering if in the bridging the multiple remote callers e through cleaner. |
| 00:58.03 | *** join/#asterisk cemotyz09 (~cemotyz09@cpe-70-121-157-202.satx.res.rr.com) |
| 01:03.01 | *** join/#asterisk ganbold (~ganbold@173.244.215.173) |
| 01:58.23 | Samot | No. |
| 01:58.32 | Samot | 1) Opus isn't a PSTN codec. |
| 01:58.53 | Samot | 2) G.722 isn't a 100% confirmed PSTN codec. |
| 01:59.17 | Samot | 3) Asterisk will transcode everything to to peer's preferred codec. |
| 01:59.35 | Samot | Add those together and you get extra load for no real benefits. |
| 02:13.33 | *** join/#asterisk paulgrmn (~paulgrmn@184.75.212.68) |
| 03:14.42 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 03:52.20 | *** join/#asterisk chiggins (~chiggins@unaffiliated/chiggins) |
| 04:08.37 | *** join/#asterisk CheBuzz (~CheBuzz@unaffiliated/chebuzz) |
| 04:14.25 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
| 04:27.54 | *** join/#asterisk dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-203-6-107.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 04:56.52 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777d632383-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 06:12.36 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777d632383-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 06:13.40 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.51) |
| 07:29.48 | *** join/#asterisk Major_Lurker (~Andrew@110-232-243-127.cust.dcsi.net.au) |
| 07:30.52 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 07:34.50 | *** join/#asterisk sebastienthiry (~Thunderbi@109.134.212.7) |
| 07:38.31 | *** join/#asterisk [sID] (~sid@77.81.226.38) |
| 07:47.57 | *** join/#asterisk defsdoor (~andy@cpc120600-sutt6-2-0-cust232.19-1.cable.virginm.net) |
| 07:59.03 | *** join/#asterisk u0m3__ (~u0m3@188.27.76.8) |
| 08:23.31 | *** join/#asterisk DanB (~DanB@clt-195.192.206.50.ip-anschluss.net) |
| 09:16.58 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 09:29.05 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon_ (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 09:42.29 | *** join/#asterisk Worldexe (~Worldexe@95-107-33-134.dsl.orel.ru) |
| 10:04.36 | *** join/#asterisk andresmujica (~andresmmu@ubuntu/member/andresmujica) |
| 10:05.53 | sibiria | does asterisk (13) and chan_sip do well with SIP response codes that aren't entirely established? like f.e. 402/payment required (reserved for future use) |
| 10:06.14 | sibiria | or does it simply not care about the response code |
| 10:15.23 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
| 10:56.27 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon_ (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 11:04.48 | *** join/#asterisk ganbold (~ganbold@173.244.215.173) |
| 11:06.04 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777d632383-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 11:24.22 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon_ (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 11:55.57 | *** join/#asterisk puzzled (~puzzled@2001:982:1097:1::1:3) |
| 12:02.42 | *** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@198.164.250.208) |
| 12:21.33 | *** join/#asterisk thiagoc (~thiagoc@unaffiliated/thiagoc) |
| 12:21.59 | *** join/#asterisk Milos (~Milos@pdpc/supporter/student/milos) |
| 12:27.27 | *** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50) |
| 12:35.23 | *** join/#asterisk zigggggy (ffssd@unaffiliated/zigggggy) |
| 12:40.09 | *** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw) |
| 12:45.38 | *** join/#asterisk sebastienthiry (~Thunderbi@109.134.212.7) |
| 12:59.35 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165) |
| 13:07.54 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
| 13:12.32 | *** join/#asterisk sotoz (~sotoz@095-097-255-066.static.chello.nl) |
| 13:15.36 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@87.116.190.157) |
| 13:20.32 | *** join/#asterisk Mr_Pleb_Mgoo (~jakeb@103.46.213.148) |
| 13:24.10 | syadnom | @Samot, I said that a bit wrong. I mean I have a conference room phone that not an asterisk conference room.... So 1 g722 or opus channel and the rest g.711. |
| 13:24.43 | Samot | Doesn't change what I said. |
| 13:24.51 | Samot | It still has to transcode. |
| 13:28.09 | *** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 13:28.09 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 14:03.03 | *** join/#asterisk waldo323 (~waldo323@75-151-31-89-Michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 14:07.37 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-clrfixkcdvwpnfez) |
| 14:07.37 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 14:28.53 | *** join/#asterisk CatCow97 (~mine9@c-24-22-38-85.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 14:33.52 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 14:34.14 | *** join/#asterisk sebastienthiry (~Thunderbi@109.134.212.7) |
| 14:36.28 | *** join/#asterisk bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-uerahahsfbkfcyds) |
| 14:36.28 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 14:39.47 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.51) |
| 14:53.28 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 14:55.54 | *** join/#asterisk defsdoor (~andy@cpc120600-sutt6-2-0-cust232.19-1.cable.virginm.net) |
| 14:58.10 | *** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-kerqtqffvkpyazoj) |
| 14:58.10 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ |
| 15:37.48 | *** join/#asterisk Mr_Pleb_Mgoo (~jakeb@103.46.213.148) |
| 15:49.53 | *** join/#asterisk CheBuzz (~CheBuzz@unaffiliated/chebuzz) |
| 16:06.57 | *** join/#asterisk sawgood (~sawgood@unaffiliated/sawgood) |
| 16:11.41 | *** join/#asterisk CheBuzz (~CheBuzz@unaffiliated/chebuzz) |
| 16:22.12 | *** join/#asterisk lilDangerz (~AllenEliz@fixed-187-189-68-170.totalplay.net) |
| 16:46.22 | *** join/#asterisk tripleslash (~triplesla@unaffiliated/imsaguy) |
| 17:14.43 | igcewieling | Heh, fiber service service we ordered from Verizon on Feb 21 should complete the install on May 15th. I guess they had to mine the silicon or something. |
| 17:21.34 | [TK]D-Fender | I waited over 9 months for my E10 when I first got it |
| 17:21.47 | igcewieling | E10? |
| 17:21.54 | [TK]D-Fender | 10MB fiber |
| 17:22.01 | igcewieling | ah. |
| 17:22.14 | [TK]D-Fender | A year and a bit ago I upped to 100mbit which was pretty quick since the actual fibre was there |
| 17:22.45 | igcewieling | Most of our more-than-1.544bps connections are EoC, but fiber is coming available at more locations |
| 17:24.20 | igcewieling | I think I'm at 25Mbps at home. The cable company pissed me off so I downgraded. |
| 17:31.01 | [TK]D-Fender | I've been on 12/10 at home for a few years now. Cable is faster but my provider gives me a public subnet, fixed IP and unlimited BW |
| 17:33.03 | igcewieling | *nod* a public subnet would be nice. |
| 17:33.34 | sibiria | are traffic limits on fixed internet connections still a thing with US providers? |
| 17:33.46 | igcewieling | the closest I have is a 2nd internet connection on ATT DSL for testing faxing on public IPs |
| 17:34.24 | igcewieling | sibiria: more ISPs are adding datacaps, but on Cable they seem reasonable for me. 1TB/month cap. |
| 17:34.58 | [TK]D-Fender | However US situation is likely about to get so much worse soon.... |
| 17:35.13 | igcewieling | sibiria: you can generally assume internet service is slower, less available, and more expensive than many other countries. |
| 17:35.36 | sibiria | yeah i've understood as much |
| 17:37.10 | igcewieling | sibiria: what country are you in? |
| 17:37.23 | sibiria | igcewieling: sweden |
| 17:40.07 | igcewieling | *nod* How many ISPs can you choose from? |
| 17:40.47 | sibiria | our ISPs have never had a pronounced cap on traffic limits, not even 20 years ago when "broadband" started popping up, but the past 5-10 years our telcos have realized they can charge up the ass with artificial and absurd traffic limits on mobile internet - 10 years ago they were quite friendly with traffic amounts on mobile |
| 17:41.17 | sibiria | igcewieling: we have 4 or 5 major ISPs in the country, and god knows how many more smaller more local ISPs |
| 18:20.59 | *** join/#asterisk ashka (~postmaste@pdpc/supporter/active/ashka) |
| 19:28.50 | *** join/#asterisk lilDangerz (~AllenEliz@187.189.68.170) |
| 19:31.44 | *** join/#asterisk sebastienthiry (~Thunderbi@109.134.212.7) |
| 20:41.38 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon_ (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 22:05.37 | *** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca) |
| 22:40.25 | *** join/#asterisk salviadud (~ralfalfa@187-162-28-201.static.axtel.net) |
| 23:01.59 | *** join/#asterisk sibyakin (~sibyakin@188.162.228.168) |
| 23:18.40 | *** join/#asterisk setham (~setham@unaffiliated/setham) |
| 23:30.54 | *** join/#asterisk Karyon_ (~Karyon@unaffiliated/karyon) |
| 23:30.56 | *** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-clrfixkcdvwpnfez) |
| 23:40.04 | *** join/#asterisk rpifan (~rpifan@99-203-30-141.pools.spcsdns.net) |
| 23:40.06 | rpifan | hi |