IRC log for #asterisk on 20200318

00:31.35*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
00:38.33wyoungvelix: Nice spam there :)
00:40.39velixwyoung: But I'm still awake and winning.
00:40.45velixwining
00:50.41wyoungvelix: epic wining :)
01:00.38*** join/#asterisk mmx870 (~mmx@ptr1.cyberia.es)
01:25.40*** join/#asterisk yuljk (~yuljk@unaffiliated/yuljk)
01:51.45*** join/#asterisk deavmi (~quassel@165.255.253.203)
01:55.14*** join/#asterisk ganbold_ (~ganbold@202.21.108.8)
02:02.20*** join/#asterisk Guest5194 (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee)
03:56.28*** join/#asterisk joako (~joako@opensuse/member/joak0)
04:21.28*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
04:28.38*** join/#asterisk velix (~velix@unaffiliated/velix)
04:37.14*** join/#asterisk velix (~velix@unaffiliated/velix)
04:44.41*** join/#asterisk tehgooch (tehgooch@unaffiliated/tehgooch)
05:18.38velixSince I've got a "pool" of four SIP accounts, can I route the users to free channels? Right now, they're hardcoded (student10 to account "student10")
05:26.04velixPerhaps Gotoif ?
05:26.36velix<PROTECTED>
05:33.23[TK]D-FenderIt's your dialplan.  Calls do whatever you tll them to
05:33.32[TK]D-Fendertell*
05:41.11*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.100)
05:52.34*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPEb4fbe4e331bd-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
05:52.47velixI'm asking just for best practice :)
05:52.59[TK]D-Fenderno such thing
05:53.06[TK]D-Fenderit's whatever logic you come up with
05:54.17velixI've got an idea, 1 sec
05:54.21[TK]D-FenderYou can GROUP them, chanisavail to see if the device has a channel in progress, blind-dial and roll-over on fail, or whatever you feel like
05:54.32[TK]D-FenderAnd that's only thinking linear
05:58.11velixWhat do you think? https://bpaste.net/raw/L6OQ
05:59.24[TK]D-Fenderso much invalid there...
06:00.18velixWhy?
06:00.21[TK]D-Fenderinvalid device names, functions called as though they were applications, etc
06:00.52[TK]D-FenderAnd why you're doing a Read() in there I have no idea...
06:01.22velixCould you please help me fixing it?
06:01.46[TK]D-FenderYou need to ask yourself what you're even doing at each step....
06:02.21[TK]D-FenderIf you can't talk your way through the logic it's not a good sign
06:02.36velixI just want to use "the next free channel".
06:03.08[TK]D-FenderDepends how you define "next" as well
06:03.55velixI've got four possible channels in total: student01, student02, student03, student04.
06:04.06velixIf 01 is in use and 02 is free, 02 should be used.
06:04.16velixIf 01 is in use and 02 is in use, but 03 is free, 03 should be used.
06:04.28velix(the example only had 2 channels!)
06:07.55*** join/#asterisk dougquaid (dougquaid@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/dougquaid)
06:07.58[TK]D-FenderSo if you never have more than 2 calls, 3 & 4 will never get used.
06:08.06[TK]D-Fenderand that's fine?
06:08.52velixThat was just an example, 4 can be used in total.
06:09.12[TK]D-Fenderthat was not an answer at all
06:09.17velixNo, it's not fine.
06:09.26[TK]D-FenderSo what should actually happen?
06:09.45[TK]D-Fenderbecause you're not happy with the flow you just wrote out
06:09.50velixLet me explain the whole thing, it's hard for me to get the right words.
06:09.59[TK]D-FenderIt really shouldn't be.
06:10.40velixWe're 10 students, having 4 SIP accounts right now and have to do phone interviews. When I assign those 4 channels "hard" to 4 students, the other 6 cannot use the lines, when the 4 are pausing.
06:10.51velixSo all channels need to be flexible.
06:11.12velixThe plan is, that there are 4 students calling in parallel only of course.
06:11.26velixBut a flexible assignement of outgoing channels is better than a fixed one.
06:11.46[TK]D-Fender4 lines of text and nothing describing the order & method of selection.
06:12.07velixOkay, sorry, I'm not speaking your langugage. Thanks for your try.
06:12.20[TK]D-Fenderno, the english is fine
06:12.28[TK]D-Fenderbut you are not saying HOW you choose the lines
06:13.01[TK]D-Fenderwhich do you pick first?  WHY?  How do you choose which to look at NEXT?
06:13.21velixI don't care, any ... random :-)
06:13.21[TK]D-FenderI jsut asked that isf you only eve had 2 calls if you were ok with only using # 1 & #2 and you said NO.
06:13.38[TK]D-FenderYou said you DID care a moment ago
06:13.39velixAny student can use 1,2,3 or 4.
06:13.43velixJust "the next free one".
06:13.57[TK]D-Fender<[TK]D-Fender> So if you never have more than 2 calls, 3 & 4 will never get used.
06:13.57[TK]D-Fender<[TK]D-Fender> and that's fine?
06:14.03[TK]D-Fendervelix> No, it's not fine.
06:14.10[TK]D-FenderSo what does THIS mean?
06:14.38[TK]D-FenderRandom means nothing matters.  But you care if 2 NEVER get used
06:14.43[TK]D-FenderMake up your mind
06:14.46velixOh, you're right. I've missunderstood it, sorry.
06:14.51[TK]D-FenderThen you can get to coding it
06:14.59velixSure, if 2 students are calling only, 3&4 aren't used.
06:15.33velixBut they could use 1&4 or 2&3 or 1&3 etc. - that's not important.
06:16.06[TK]D-FenderSo if you have only 2 going on at a time you don't CARE which one gets used, and it should just use whatever it can with no importance of order?
06:16.44velixExactly, I don't care which one is used. There's no importance.
06:17.22[TK]D-FenderSo go fix your use of ChanIsAvail to include all 4 devices to check and see what the result looks like
06:17.49velixok, let me play.
06:23.06velixAh okay: "ChanIsAvail is not a solution to tell you conclusively whether the channel is busy or not, it is primarily to tell you whether it would be possible to send a call there. "
06:23.13[TK]D-FenderAnd Read has no place in this logic.  Your description didn't include getting input from the user
06:23.39[TK]D-FenderAs for your comment, there is an OPTION that you skipped that solves that
06:27.43*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPEb4fbe4e331bd-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
06:28.49velixHmm. maybe GotoIf($["${AVAILSTATUS}" =~ "2"]?busy:call)
06:33.40[TK]D-Fender"s - Consider the channel unavailable if the channel is in use at all" <---
06:34.52velixHmm, I've just read, ChanisAvailable is outdated and I should use group counts, like you suggested.
06:34.54velixOh dear...
06:35.01[TK]D-Fendereither works
06:35.45velixMan... I'm too stupid for this: https://bpaste.net/raw/BQOQ
06:36.36[TK]D-Fendergetting a lot closer
06:36.58[TK]D-Fenderlast 3 lines don't get used though
06:39.32velixAnd the rest also doesn't work: No application 'Cut' for extension
06:39.59[TK]D-Fenderthat was in your first code ssample
06:40.05[TK]D-Fenderyour 2nd changed your usage of it
06:41.22*** join/#asterisk elguero (~miguel323@74-95-21-41-Connecticut.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
06:42.27*** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca)
06:43.27velixI cannot get it to work, no matter what I try.
06:44.42[TK]D-Fenderyou just described an error that did not exist in the last code pastebin
06:44.52[TK]D-FenderWhich means you've mixed things up
06:45.09[TK]D-FenderAnd you're acting on variable results without looking at them at each step
06:45.18[TK]D-FenderAnd not looking = acting blind.
06:45.36*** join/#asterisk sa02irc (~mbax@155-079-043-212.ip-addr.inexio.net)
06:46.13velixReally, that _is_ from the laste code in pastebin.
06:46.26velixoh nooo
06:46.27velixnoooo
06:46.34velixyou're right, my DSL line broke down.
06:46.38velixSFTp didn't upload it
06:46.48[TK]D-Fenderit very obviously isn't what was executed
06:48.22velixYeah, the error is: Syntax: CUT(<varname>,<char-delim>,<range-spec>) - missing argument
06:48.24velixmakes sense
06:48.36[TK]D-Fenderalso, no | <----------------
06:48.50[TK]D-Fenderexten => _0049X.,4,Dial(${CUT(AVAILCHAN||1)}/00${EXTEN:4},,rWTg)
06:48.54[TK]D-Fenderlike you put here
06:49.29velixSeems like it wants commas:  CUT(<varname>,<char-delim>,<range-spec>) - missing argument!
06:49.37velixyeah
06:49.42[TK]D-Fenderexactly
06:50.35velixCan I display the content of AVAILCHAN somehow? I don't know how to cut it.
06:50.48[TK]D-FenderNoOp() <-
06:50.57[TK]D-Fenderor Verbose()
06:57.23[TK]D-FenderYou seem to be getting warmer on the idea
06:57.27[TK]D-FenderI'm off for now.
06:57.31velix:-((
06:57.34velix:-(((
06:58.00[TK]D-Fenderparting thought: You are trying to check all 4 at once.  If you find the result is a hassle then just check them consecutively.
06:58.05[TK]D-Fender^
06:58.35velixIs there no way, you could write the lines for me quickly?
06:58.37velixPlease.
06:58.41[TK]D-FenderCheck 1.  If free Dial out.  If not check next.
06:59.03[TK]D-FenderI told you the option to use
06:59.14[TK]D-FenderThis should be easy.  Go look at what it gives you
06:59.22velixOPTION ?
06:59.28velixI mean is it called "OPTION"?
07:12.57velixThis works for me: https://bpaste.net/raw/EKVQ
07:17.36*** join/#asterisk Alblasco1702 (~Alblasco1@ip5456b46b.speed.planet.nl)
07:23.08velixOh great, why is "AVAILSTATUS" zero here?
07:23.45velix"s – Consider the channel unavailable if the channel is in use at all (buggy with SIP, always returning 0?!)"
07:23.48velixgnarrrrrrrrr
07:28.12*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:5037:518b:d158:69a2)
07:28.35*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:5037:518b:d158:69a2)
07:30.26*** join/#asterisk tsal_ (~tsal@i59F5F6CD.versanet.de)
07:34.58*** join/#asterisk allizom (~Thunderbi@unaffiliated/allizom)
07:39.51*** join/#asterisk kerx (~kerx@cpe-98-148-210-69.socal.res.rr.com)
07:53.28*** join/#asterisk defsdoor (~Andrew@cpc120600-sutt6-2-0-cust232.19-1.cable.virginm.net)
08:06.01*** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:1019:6eef:b9cb:e499:e286:f4f7)
08:06.36*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.62)
08:43.40*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@178-223-3-39.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs)
09:14.06*** join/#asterisk eharris (~eharris@unaffiliated/eharris)
09:58.41*** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:1019:6eef:b9cb:e499:e286:f4f7)
10:01.15*** join/#asterisk petris (~quassel@li-docker.host.petris.net)
10:04.40*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:07.23*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:10.06*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:19.52*** join/#asterisk derPlexus (~plexus@81.173.204.226)
10:20.35*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:22.00*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:22.32*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:29.45*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@178-223-3-39.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs)
10:32.28*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:33.23*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@178-223-3-39.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs)
10:40.51*** join/#asterisk ruied (~ruied@PARSIS.PT)
10:41.39*** join/#asterisk daemonwrangler (~daemonwra@168.235.108.29)
10:43.41*** join/#asterisk lambda (~xiretza@mail.xiretza.xyz)
10:46.28*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
10:53.02*** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:1019:6eef:b9cb:e499:e286:f4f7)
10:53.02*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
11:01.16ruiedHello. What does it mean the "Local" -> Dial("Local/<MyExternalNumber>@root-00000014;2", "pjsip/<MyExternalNumber>@G9")
11:01.33*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
11:03.38ruiedIf I Forward a call at Grandstream phone(ext 60) to my mobile number in the dialplan appears a "Local" and the call doesn't reach my phone... If I dial from my 60 extension to my mobile number the asterisk  cli shows: Dial("pjsip/<MyExternalNumber>@root-00000014;2", "pjsip/<MyExternalNumber>@G9") and all is ok
11:04.54fileit's a channel executing dialplan, and is how call forwarding works
11:05.00fileby itself it is not the problem
11:05.17fileit may expose a configuration problem or some other issue with your setup
11:09.27*** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:1019:6eef:b9cb:e499:e286:f4f7)
11:18.20*** join/#asterisk tafa2 (~tafa2@185.115.101.208)
11:23.06*** join/#asterisk scampbell (~scampbell@mail.scampbell.net)
11:34.47*** join/#asterisk Ner0Zer0 (~Ner0Zer0@87.253.63.54)
11:35.04Ner0Zer0Hello
11:37.16joepublicgreetings
11:38.05Ner0Zer0allow me to ask a question
11:38.46Ner0Zer0During Isolation and everyone working from home I was forced to move VoIP clients to VPN connection
11:39.45Ner0Zer0in general that is mean that the clients sitting in a different network 10.17.0.0 - VoIP Server 10.25.0.0 - VoIP clients
11:40.20Ner0Zer0I added this net in localnet in sip configuration
11:40.58Ner0Zer0but unfortunately that doesn't seems to work
11:41.49Ner0Zer0could anyone give me a clue ?
11:50.19Ner0Zer0no one ?
11:50.40*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:5037:518b:d158:69a2)
11:55.59*** join/#asterisk dacod (~dacod@177.204.38.21.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br)
12:00.00cuscoNer0Zer0: that should work
12:00.04cuscois that subnet routed ?
12:00.15cuscoNer0Zer0: also you should try #networking
12:00.19cuscoand what is not working?
12:02.19Ner0Zer0yes
12:02.26Ner0Zer0i can see both nets all ports
12:02.30*** join/#asterisk JohnWigley (uid264251@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yaywwkrslgmwumvd)
12:02.53Ner0Zer010.17.0.0/24 and 10.25.0.0/24
12:03.13Ner0Zer0the phone is authorising
12:03.35Ner0Zer0i can make a call but dont here the other side
12:03.48Ner0Zer0the other side (on the original net) can here me
12:04.43Ner0Zer0if I tcpdump the client I can see that no UDP packets sent from VoIP server to client but udp stream from clinet to server does exists
12:05.01Ner0Zer0also if I set nat=comedia it does wotk... sometimes...
12:05.53Ner0Zer0i'm very new to asterisk so sorry if I'm asking silly questions
12:56.45*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
12:57.13*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
13:09.44*** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50)
13:24.40*** join/#asterisk derPlexus (~plexus@81.173.204.226)
13:28.38*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165)
13:36.10*** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:1019:6eef:e5ca:4ef3:6ca8:29c9)
13:37.31KobazNer0Zer0: that works... paste debugs/captures/settings
13:37.45Kobazwithout that, it's like answering 'my car wont start'... without bringing it into the shop
13:41.37*** join/#asterisk mcdonali_ (~imcdona@65-100-46-166.dia.static.qwest.net)
23:14.55*** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@c-174-52-60-165.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
23:14.55*** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.32.0 (2020/03/12) 16.9.0 (2020/03/12) Standard: 17.3.0 (2020/03/12); DAHDI: 3.0.0 (2018/11/15); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22
23:27.16*** join/#asterisk spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
23:27.37*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:5037:518b:d158:69a2)
23:32.24*** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76)
23:36.47*** join/#asterisk Guest5194 (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee)
23:53.39wyoungvelix: noooice
23:55.32joakoSo I have defined pjsip endpoints but all the pjsip show commands show nothing. For e.g. pjsip show endpoints says: No objects found
23:59.39*** join/#asterisk sawgood (~sawgood@unaffiliated/sawgood)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.