| 00:45.13 | *** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76) |
| 01:06.55 | *** join/#asterisk mahlon (~mahlon@martini.nu) |
| 01:28.24 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:20a2:161a:f933:963c) |
| 02:13.39 | Micc | I think I need to go back to basics and test with a simple webrtc example without asterisk and learn how to debug and test things with that, then add in the asterisk part. There's just too many layers I don't understand at this point to know how to properly debug audio issues with webrtc. |
| 02:16.46 | Samot | So what are you going to use instead? |
| 02:17.05 | Samot | That will give you the level of access you will need? |
| 02:22.34 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:20a2:161a:f933:963c) |
| 02:24.09 | Micc | https://webrtc.github.io/samples/ |
| 02:30.53 | Samot | Micc: So Party A calls Party B, Party A has two-way audio and Party B has one-way audio (outgoing)? |
| 02:41.16 | Micc | Yes, Although now that I think about it, maybe it's party A that has one way audio (in). |
| 02:47.46 | Samot | Which party can hear the other party? |
| 02:47.52 | Samot | The Caller or the Callee? |
| 02:49.08 | Samot | I call you, I can hear you but you can't hear me? |
| 02:49.31 | Samot | Or I call you, I can't hear you but you can hear me? |
| 03:24.48 | *** join/#asterisk spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 03:49.41 | *** join/#asterisk joako (~joako@opensuse/member/joak0) |
| 03:51.58 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
| 04:34.19 | *** join/#asterisk joako (~joako@opensuse/member/joak0) |
| 05:10.10 | *** join/#asterisk derPlexus (~plexus@ip-178-203-131-93.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de) |
| 06:02.15 | *** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@c-174-52-60-165.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 06:02.15 | *** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.32.0 (2020/03/12) 16.9.0 (2020/03/12) Standard: 17.3.0 (2020/03/12); DAHDI: 3.0.0 (2018/11/15); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22 |
| 06:04.15 | *** join/#asterisk ganbold (~ganbold@202.21.108.8) |
| 06:08.45 | *** join/#asterisk tsal (~tsal@i59F4A463.versanet.de) |
| 06:21.06 | *** join/#asterisk dansan (~daniel@cpe-76-183-130-197.tx.res.rr.com) |
| 06:54.11 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPEb4fbe4e331bd-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 07:25.10 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:f153:1bf7:68ad:938d) |
| 07:29.11 | *** join/#asterisk RudyValencia (rudy@unaffiliated/rudyvalencia) |
| 07:33.09 | *** join/#asterisk sa02irc (~mbax@155-079-043-212.ip-addr.inexio.net) |
| 07:41.15 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@178-222-1-219.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs) |
| 07:57.49 | *** join/#asterisk RudyValencia (rudy@unaffiliated/rudyvalencia) |
| 08:42.31 | *** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@185.61.186.152) |
| 08:56.06 | *** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:1748:fad4:7260:e5c6:5dac:c797:4610) |
| 10:15.13 | *** join/#asterisk guerby (~guerby@april/board/guerby) |
| 10:31.26 | *** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@185.61.186.152) |
| 11:01.32 | velix | What's the benefit of running Asterisk in forks or without forks? |
| 11:34.44 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@51.247.195.35.bc.googleusercontent.com) |
| 12:39.38 | *** join/#asterisk miltux (~miltux@94-225-27-17.access.telenet.be) |
| 12:47.02 | TandyUK | when a "Google Caller ID" using person recieves a call from one of my customers, they are getting incorrect caller Name displayed. This caller ID lookup function on android handsets clearly has some sort of database behind it, but I'm struggling to figure out what, or how someone would go about reporting errors with the data. Any ideas? |
| 12:57.44 | Samot | And what is it showing as the wrong name? Is it showing a name or something generic? |
| 13:13.53 | Samot | TandyUK: ^^^ |
| 13:48.28 | sibiria | getting in contact with google for either support or reporting bugs has over the years been shown to be almost impossible |
| 13:48.37 | sibiria | across their entire product range, even for customers paying big money |
| 13:51.38 | *** join/#asterisk CatCow97 (~mine9@c-73-96-109-206.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 13:54.04 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (uid358942@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dhqcnzxgriolxltt) |
| 13:54.05 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 13:55.45 | *** join/#asterisk bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ntkbuhhmqxzpkviu) |
| 13:55.45 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 14:23.21 | Samot | sibiria: Nothing says this is actually a Google problem. |
| 14:26.43 | *** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76) |
| 14:44.14 | *** join/#asterisk retentiveboy_ (~retentive@2001:558:6011:a2:6c20:c96f:ca4f:bf72) |
| 15:01.25 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 15:01.25 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ |
| 15:05.42 | *** join/#asterisk irrgit (~ch33se@parajsa.chat) |
| 15:39.12 | *** join/#asterisk hfb (~hfb@47.139.18.84) |
| 15:51.55 | *** join/#asterisk matteo (~matteo@redhat/matteo) |
| 16:15.32 | *** join/#asterisk matteo| (~matteo@redhat/matteo) |
| 16:24.19 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@195.209.246.194) |
| 16:31.30 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 16:38.26 | *** join/#asterisk lbazan (~lbazan@fedora/LoKoMurdoK) |
| 16:55.21 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@94.233.241.127) |
| 16:56.27 | *** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@185.61.186.152) |
| 17:00.01 | Micc | TandyUK, the cell carriers also have their own caller id lookups sometimes. |
| 17:03.13 | *** join/#asterisk chandoo (~chandoo@pool-100-1-166-161.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net) |
| 17:19.06 | *** join/#asterisk koltrast (869fb223@h77-53-57-114.cust.a3fiber.se) |
| 17:23.09 | *** join/#asterisk irrgit (~ch33se@parajsa.chat) |
| 17:43.39 | drmessano | 09:48:37 <sibiria> across their entire product range, even for customers paying big money <-- Not True |
| 17:44.06 | drmessano | As a paying G Suite Customer, I can call them directly |
| 18:02.42 | *** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76) |
| 18:11.07 | Micc | drmessano, you're right. I've called them a couple times about g suite email filtering and they are pretty good at digging into the problems. |
| 18:12.11 | drmessano | I've never had a problem reaching google support for PAID applications |
| 18:19.51 | *** join/#asterisk juser123 (~juser123@d28-23-147-86.dim.wideopenwest.com) |
| 18:20.54 | *** join/#asterisk sawgood (~sawgood@unaffiliated/sawgood) |
| 19:43.37 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@94.233.241.127) |
| 19:52.40 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@ip-213-127-79-161.ip.prioritytelecom.net) |
| 19:54.01 | sibiria | google's systematic neglect of support is the #1 complaint business customers with google has |
| 19:54.28 | *** join/#asterisk scampbell (~scampbell@mail.scampbell.net) |
| 19:54.43 | sibiria | but, obviously, there's support given somewhere in their product line |
| 19:56.23 | *** join/#asterisk retentiveboy (~retentive@c-73-43-121-243.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 19:56.28 | Samot | sibiria: Again, nothing is showing this is Google's fault. |
| 19:57.09 | Samot | Could be the CNAM lookup and what LIDB source they are using. |
| 19:57.37 | Samot | Could be that the carrier is prefixing a "+" and changing what the source number looks like. |
| 19:59.33 | sibiria | only mentioned as an aside |
| 20:26.52 | drmessano | 15:54:02 <sibiria> google's systematic neglect of support is the #1 complaint business customers with google has <-- Source? |
| 20:30.43 | sibiria | drmessano: reading detailed first-hand accounts on various tech news aggregators for over a decade |
| 20:31.18 | sibiria | it rarely goes 1 month between a new story of this blowing up on Hacker News, just to make one example |
| 20:32.26 | sibiria | be it GC, Maps, YT, Play/Movies, Nest, someone's big product on Play Store etc. |
| 20:36.58 | drmessano | People never blog, tweet, or post on forums about success stories or working apps. A single-sided story of someones negative tech support experience is a very limited datapoint. |
| 20:37.36 | sibiria | that's less relevant. incidents should never be allowed to extend for days, without communications |
| 20:37.55 | sibiria | whether it's someone paying $25 a month for 3 gmail accounts, or $25000 a month for their entire platform in GC |
| 20:38.34 | sibiria | customers should never be left stranded with everything they're built taken away, without a single word or explanation, and without any possibility to get in touch with an actual person to try sort things out |
| 20:39.22 | sibiria | the only thing more unbelievable than how many horror stories about enterprise customers being fucked over in the google product landscape are the details of the stories |
| 20:39.33 | drmessano | You're saying it should NEVER be allowed to happen, as a response to my comment about it being a limited data set. You asserted earlier "09:48:28 <sibiria> getting in contact with google for either support or reporting bugs has over the years been shown to be almost impossible". I haven't seen or experienced anything close to "almost impossible" |
| 20:39.46 | sibiria | glad to hear it |
| 20:40.22 | drmessano | and yes, I read the interwebs too. |
| 21:28.46 | *** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@185.61.186.152) |
| 21:39.57 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:f153:1bf7:68ad:938d) |
| 21:42.59 | *** join/#asterisk renrelkha (~ahklerner@unaffiliated/ahklerner) |
| 21:44.53 | renrelkha | its been a few years since i messed with asterisk. i believe at that time i used a web gui to admin, but i think it was not asterisk maybe some fork of it. does the base asterisk have web gui? |
| 21:45.19 | file | nope |
| 21:45.26 | file | it's never had a built in GUI |
| 21:45.55 | renrelkha | ok, thank you |
| 21:55.54 | *** join/#asterisk ryangpx (~ryan.gehr@unaffiliated/deviantlinux) |
| 21:57.00 | ryangpx | hi! What is a rock solid version of Asterisk 16, you folks are actually using in Production? Or, is there a page where I can find truly stable versions of Asterisk, rather than just picking the latest release? |
| 22:05.49 | Samot | 16 is the stable version. |
| 22:06.06 | Samot | The latest release ensures you have any bug fixes. |
| 22:06.26 | Samot | Features don't get added during a version's lifecycle. |
| 22:06.59 | Samot | 13, 16, 17 are all stable versions. |
| 22:14.08 | *** join/#asterisk CarlosTico (~CarlosTic@107-134-203-65.lightspeed.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net) |
| 22:24.01 | *** join/#asterisk sawgood (~sawgood@unaffiliated/sawgood) |
| 22:34.37 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@2a02:a210:2241:6480:f153:1bf7:68ad:938d) |
| 22:35.38 | *** join/#asterisk matrix1233 (~matrix123@2a04:cec0:11c9:9f4a:9538:8798:3038:b82c) |
| 22:53.40 | *** join/#asterisk CarlosTico4 (~CarlosTic@107-134-203-65.lightspeed.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net) |
| 23:22.00 | *** join/#asterisk chandoo (~chandoo@pool-100-1-166-161.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net) |
| 23:35.54 | *** join/#asterisk tsal (~tsal@i59F5F8A1.versanet.de) |