| 00:00.15 | starseeker | OK, that was really weird, but it worked. Does BRL-CAD need the zlib copy included with it? |
| 00:00.46 | ``Erik | src/other/libz ? |
| 00:01.18 | starseeker | opennurbs/zlib |
| 00:01.59 | brlcad | no, but to remove it requires a few mods |
| 00:02.02 | starseeker | sorry - the opennurbs tarball has a copy of zlib |
| 00:02.05 | starseeker | ah :-) |
| 00:02.25 | brlcad | we've modified them in our src tree, but we're also one release behind them now |
| 00:02.45 | starseeker | ah |
| 00:02.50 | brlcad | i had to make a slew of cross-platform compilation fixes too, but maybe they've fixed those |
| 00:03.27 | brlcad | fortunately, all of our big mods have been left out of their source tree |
| 00:03.51 | brlcad | "we" (jason) implemented a lot of the functions that they took out of opennurbs |
| 00:04.05 | brlcad | as they intentionally don't want it used the way we're using it |
| 00:04.22 | starseeker | That's annoying |
| 00:04.29 | brlcad | (i.e. as part of a nurbs evaluation kernel) |
| 00:04.52 | brlcad | as they see it as directly competing with one of their commercial products they sell |
| 00:04.58 | starseeker | So BRL-CAD can use (in theory) an external copy? |
| 00:05.02 | starseeker | indeed |
| 00:05.03 | brlcad | in theory |
| 00:05.19 | brlcad | like I said, haven't tried the latest |
| 00:05.34 | brlcad | you might want to try upgrading our copy first, just in case there were api changes |
| 00:05.41 | brlcad | might/should be easier |
| 00:05.57 | brlcad | then work on making the patch that the ebuild will need from their zip |
| 00:06.13 | brlcad | how is the ebuild supposed to get the zip? |
| 00:06.21 | starseeker | got me |
| 00:06.28 | starseeker | may require fetch restrictions |
| 00:06.31 | brlcad | iirc, they have this click-through contact form |
| 00:06.49 | brlcad | you don't have to fill in anything, but you can't get to the download link without going through it iirc |
| 00:07.06 | starseeker | well, if it's free Gentoo can make a tarball :-) |
| 00:07.12 | brlcad | and host it? |
| 00:07.24 | starseeker | maybe. or we could |
| 00:08.08 | brlcad | I wouldn't without an okay from mcneel, and that's not likely given how we use it |
| 00:08.23 | brlcad | even if license-wise there's no reason we couldn't |
| 00:08.56 | starseeker | Hmm |
| 00:09.07 | starseeker | ok |
| 00:09.26 | brlcad | but you're welcome to ask :) |
| 00:09.31 | starseeker | hehe |
| 00:09.54 | brlcad | yay, one of my stitches just came out |
| 00:10.07 | brlcad | that's been irritating for days |
| 00:10.09 | starseeker | I'll let the Gentoo devs ask :-P |
| 00:10.18 | brlcad | heh, that works |
| 00:10.44 | ``Erik | soluble stitches? |
| 00:11.55 | brlcad | yeah |
| 00:17.41 | ``Erik | cool beans |
| 01:15.28 | starseeker | brlcad: So are the opennurbs guys actively annoyed with us, or they just didn't provide the functions jason recreated in order to avoid making it TOO easy for the competition? |
| 01:33.31 | brlcad | starseeker: i'm not sure I'd characterize it as annoyed or not, I don't know -- but I do know that they openly state that using the library as part of any geometric modeling kernel is and was not the reason that the sources are provided and that they specifically will *not* help anyone using it in that regard |
| 01:35.09 | brlcad | if you read through their news/mailing list for the past couple years (archived on their site iirc), you'll see at least a half dozen questions that come up with people trying to use it as such where they reiterate that it's not supposed to be used for that and they don't provide any help |
| 04:19.40 | Axman6 | sound like a bunch of wankers. how does doing that help anyone? |
| 04:41.16 | *** join/#brlcad jgay (n=jgay@fsf/staff/jgay) |
| 05:08.31 | Axman6 | ....................... |
| 05:08.34 | Axman6 | oh god |
| 05:08.39 | starseeker | Thank goodness the stix font beta had already come and gone or I would have started suspecting an early April 1st |
| 05:09.59 | starseeker | Axman6: Exactly :-) |
| 05:11.19 | starseeker | As much as I have to grit my teeth to say it - Good for Microsoft; well done |
| 05:13.06 | Axman6 | only what, two years too late? |
| 05:13.28 | starseeker | ``Erik: Do you by any chance have autoconf build logic for opennurbs that could be used for a stand alone install? They don't seem to have even a make install command... |
| 05:13.35 | starseeker | Heh - better late than never |
| 05:13.56 | starseeker | From what I recall, ACID2 stumped everyone for a while - I think Konqueror was the first to get it right? |
| 05:14.09 | Axman6 | Safari was the first |
| 05:14.21 | starseeker | Ah, right |
| 05:14.23 | Axman6 | which then meant konquorer came next, then opera |
| 05:15.31 | Axman6 | and now the KDE guys have basically dropped the main khtml stuff, and they're going to use Apple's WebKit for konqueror... because bugs get fixed faster :P |
| 05:17.37 | starseeker | Hey, as long as it works :-) |
| 05:17.58 | starseeker | I guess you could call WebKit khtml2.0, based on where it came from... |
| 05:18.54 | Axman6 | well khtml basically died about a year ago. there's been no work on it for ages |
| 05:19.41 | Axman6 | Apple have done a fantastic job with webkit, fast, makes things look good, very standards complient |
| 05:20.00 | starseeker | Hard to argue with that, and if the licensing is OK why not use it? |
| 05:21.01 | Axman6 | yeah, not sure what it's licence is actually, good chance it's GPL though |
| 05:21.22 | starseeker | Apple does good work, as a rule |
| 05:21.38 | starseeker | The problem is (for me at least) they charge accordingly :-) |
| 05:21.55 | Axman6 | well i could seriously imagine steve standing behind guys witha whip... |
| 05:22.07 | Axman6 | macs are cheap these days man, and so's OS X |
| 05:22.29 | starseeker | They aren't bad, but Linux is free and almost all of it is open :-) |
| 05:23.10 | starseeker | One thing about Mac OSX's graphics systems - they are very definitely NOT open |
| 05:23.41 | Axman6 | linux is a play thing for me, there's just not enough polish with it, things are still too hard to use, and it lacks the consistancy i get with OS X. i know linux definitely has it's place, but i don't think that's the desktop yet |
| 05:23.41 | starseeker | Plus, as time goes by I'm coming more and more to appreciate the X method of communication - it is relatively language independent |
| 05:24.10 | Axman6 | heh, X is one of the main reasons i don't like linux |
| 05:25.06 | starseeker | X is actually quite an excellent piece of work, but it didn't get the fancy stuff until recently thanks to the XFree86 organizational setup (as I understand it) |
| 05:25.14 | Axman6 | yeah, that argument usually doesn't go down very well on irc... but you're talking to people who irc, so they're not going to be your average joe ;) |
| 05:25.23 | starseeker | I remember noticing a lot of abrupt improvements in Cygwin's X support after Xorg took off... |
| 05:26.54 | Axman6 | i just think the structure of X is stupid. i don't understand using a client server model when you're using a single machine. X forwarding is nice ish, but there are other ways, and that should really be a side thing these days |
| 05:26.59 | Axman6 | if that makes any sense |
| 05:27.59 | starseeker | Well, the advantage of client-server is that you don't have to care what programming languages are being used in client or server. Programming a GUI on Mac OSX in anything other than Objective C requires some FFI work at some layer, as I understand it |
| 05:28.48 | Axman6 | well you can use many different things like QT and gtk if you want |
| 05:28.56 | starseeker | The X architecture is one of the reasons Lisp can talk to it well - it doesn't require an FFI bridge |
| 05:29.26 | starseeker | Oh, sure - you can use a lib to paper over the differences if someone has written one (and QT is a good one by all the accounts I have heard) |
| 05:29.43 | starseeker | But the client/server flexibility still makes many things easier in the end |
| 05:30.12 | starseeker | Sorta like the trend towards web clients for apps, although I'm not terribly impressed with that personally... |
| 05:30.48 | Axman6 | still, if you've ever used a mac for a while, you start to feel that the gui is really 'solid' its hard to explain, but with X and the windows managers you use, you can feel that windows are made of little bitmaps and such |
| 05:31.10 | starseeker | Sure. I'm not claiming OSX isn't more polished - it is |
| 05:31.26 | starseeker | But to me that's less critical than the core technologies behind it :-) |
| 05:32.12 | starseeker | Apples technologies are probably pretty good overall (unless you're trying to make an McCLIM backend to the OSX graphics layer...) but they're also completely closed up |
| 05:32.58 | starseeker | Heh - I've gotta hit the hay here before my head demolishes my keyboard... I like this keyboard |
| 05:33.33 | Axman6 | i also like how easy the tools for OS X are to use for the gui. you drag and drop some stuff, put it where it tells you, and you end up with a HIG complient interface, that's fully OpenGL backed, and looks great |
| 05:33.45 | Axman6 | haha, ok man, take care |
| 05:34.11 | starseeker | If you don't like X, you might take a look at http://picogui.org/ or http://fresco.org/ |
| 05:36.08 | Axman6 | interesting |
| 06:41.41 | brlcad | Axman6: I don't see them as wankers, it was pretty cool/useful that they released openNURBS at all, and they're not actively prohibiting anyone -- they're just not going to help make a direct competitor to a product they sell |
| 06:42.35 | brlcad | the reason they released it was to give people free 3DM read/write file support for the Rhino file format -- we could really trivially write a Rhino-to-BRL-CAD importer/exporter now |
| 06:45.21 | Axman6 | yeah |
| 06:49.40 | *** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy (i=clock@77-56-92-195.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 08:21.11 | *** join/#brlcad ibot (i=ibot@rikers.org) |
| 08:21.11 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad || Channel logs at http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || BRL-CAD is on scan.coverity.com but still offline || Release 7.12.0 coming soon to a desktop near you |
| 08:37.10 | *** join/#brlcad Axman6 (n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
| 08:48.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/include/vmath.h: |
| 08:48.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: provide DEG2RAD and RAD2DEG constants for pi/180 and 180/pi; rename the new |
| 08:48.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: V3AE2DIR to V3DIR_FROM_AZEL to be more consistent with other vmath macros, |
| 08:48.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: similarly making first arg the dir instead of last; implement the complementary |
| 08:48.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: AZEL_FROM_V3DIR for setting an az/el from a direction vector as well (untested) |
| 08:49.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/librt/view_obj.c: update from V3AE2DIR to newly renamed V3DIR_FROM_AZEL macro name |
| 08:55.04 | Z80-Boy | Did anyone from here already get contacted by Google recruitment? |
| 08:55.26 | brlcad | huh? |
| 08:55.30 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/libbn/const.c: use the vmath.h/math.h macros where available (math.h are generally higher precision), convert all constants to fastf_t values. |
| 08:56.14 | Z80-Boy | They said they have Vont Cerf and Ken Thomson |
| 08:56.17 | Z80-Boy | Vint |
| 08:57.20 | brlcad | they hire all sorts of people ... like many many many companies |
| 08:59.55 | Z80-Boy | Is it true they are famous for secretivity? |
| 09:00.21 | Axman6 | sounds more like apple. google are pretty open |
| 09:07.11 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54874E5F.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 09:39.07 | Z80-Boy | brlcad: do you someone who could donate his superfluous supercomputing capacity for ocassional rendering of a project like Ronja? |
| 09:39.32 | Z80-Boy | Like I would like to make the video anti-aliased but that would render a month... |
| 09:39.43 | Z80-Boy | on my laptop |
| 09:50.14 | Axman6 | Z80-Boy: what're you rendering and how? |
| 09:50.29 | Z80-Boy | Axman6: Ronja models, using BRL-CAD rt |
| 09:51.09 | Axman6 | right, never heard of ronja |
| 09:51.24 | Z80-Boy | http://ronja.twibright.com/3d/ |
| 09:52.48 | Axman6 | hmm, i'm confused now |
| 09:53.06 | Axman6 | are mounting brackets really that interesting? :P |
| 09:54.43 | Z80-Boy | There are no mounting brackets on the page I posted. Mounting brackets are mentioned in the news on the title page and there is no 3D model of mounting brackets./ |
| 09:56.49 | Axman6 | the pics look like mounting brackets to me, but anyway. looks like a cool idea now i know what it does |
| 09:57.14 | Z80-Boy | aha I thought you are talking about the specific part of Ronja that is officially called mounting brackets |
| 09:57.59 | Z80-Boy | The 3D models are important for people to know how to put all the parts together. |
| 09:58.17 | Z80-Boy | Also to see what it looks like how it's interfaced to the building etc. |
| 09:58.28 | Z80-Boy | How bulky it is |
| 09:58.31 | Axman6 | yeah |
| 09:58.55 | Axman6 | what's wrong with wifi and parabolic reflectors anyway? :P |
| 09:59.07 | Z80-Boy | There's nothing wrong with them |
| 09:59.18 | Z80-Boy | They just have a different set of advantages and weaknesses |
| 10:00.51 | Z80-Boy | Here is some discussion of possible problems with WiFi that Ronja can be a solution for: http://ronja.twibright.com/wifi.php |
| 10:13.53 | vedge | Z80-Boy: very cool. i know some people who are having problems with interference from airplanes in my area and it's so bad they're basically stuck with an unreliable cable ISP because of this. |
| 10:14.31 | vedge | we have a very good wifi provider, and i know people there have been trying to figure out a way around this problem. i'll send them the link. |
| 10:18.17 | Z80-Boy | I had an Internet connection through 2 Ronjas in series and it was quite reliable |
| 10:18.30 | Z80-Boy | The biggest problem was they were still prototypes and in process of debugging |
| 10:18.51 | Z80-Boy | But they still genrally appeared to be more reliable than wifis and cables we had in the same network :) |
| 10:26.55 | vedge | cool |
| 10:28.36 | vedge | i'm opening a pcb shop, in case you're looking for a small/medium qty manufacturer in north america |
| 10:36.10 | archivist | vedge #electronics has people asking about pcb makers now and again |
| 10:36.55 | Z80-Boy | vedge: I already have a company where I send prototypes |
| 10:39.53 | Z80-Boy | vedge: can you send post order internationally? |
| 10:41.05 | Z80-Boy | Can you do all the necessary technologies - HAL, through plating, solder mask, edge routing? |
| 10:41.11 | Z80-Boy | I mean edge milling |
| 10:45.42 | vedge | archivist: thanks for the tip |
| 10:46.14 | vedge | Z80-Boy: i'm in canada, i think sending small pcbs internationally through canada post would be around $10 |
| 10:47.11 | Z80-Boy | If you were interested you could sell the Ronja PCBs and I could put you on the website as a supplier |
| 10:47.22 | vedge | i can do all of this, but i don't have a machine in my PCB assembly line for edge milling, extra setup time would be involved for that |
| 10:47.45 | Z80-Boy | The transmitter has 3 rectangular millings |
| 10:48.05 | Z80-Boy | can you dissolve the cost in a larger series? |
| 10:48.49 | vedge | i wonder if punch pressing would work for PCB material, that would be a lot cheaper than actual milling. |
| 10:48.51 | Z80-Boy | Here is the old shop http://ronjashop.com/info.php?lang=en |
| 10:48.53 | vedge | yes |
| 10:49.06 | Z80-Boy | I don't know if this guy is still operating |
| 10:49.17 | Z80-Boy | He doesn't seem to having upgraded from Twister to Twister2 |
| 10:49.24 | archivist | pressing is normal for paper boards |
| 10:49.33 | Z80-Boy | He has the prices on his website you could see if you can be competitive |
| 10:50.06 | Z80-Boy | Of course only in case such a small project is actually interesting for you financially |
| 10:52.46 | vedge | my equipment is not entirely ready for production just yet, i'm still working on the testing phase. i'll get back to you on this. |
| 10:53.41 | vedge | i have basically all of the fabrication equipment ready, but no testing system. |
| 10:54.40 | Z80-Boy | you mean electrical and optical testing? |
| 10:55.53 | vedge | yes |
| 10:56.02 | vedge | and i can't exactly afford a $200k "bed of nails" |
| 10:57.12 | Z80-Boy | I wonder if with all the cost of handling individual orders a project like Ronja could be interesting for you financially |
| 10:57.40 | archivist | heh send RF testing to me in the UK |
| 10:57.51 | Z80-Boy | It should theoretically be a small, but continuous income |
| 10:58.31 | Z80-Boy | Like the Ronjashop sold already about 500 boards IIRC |
| 10:58.55 | Z80-Boy | It's actually a student who always orders a series of 100 or 200 and then sells it apart individually |
| 10:59.16 | Z80-Boy | You get 1/6 of the price you would pay if you ordered your board individually in a PCB manufacturere. |
| 10:59.34 | vedge | oh, this is exactly the sort of project i'm interested into. |
| 10:59.44 | Z80-Boy | that's good |
| 10:59.59 | vedge | i have a mostly-automated assembly line, i order films and supplies in bulk, but it's far from being a big plant. |
| 11:00.15 | Z80-Boy | Can you do optical testing? |
| 11:00.48 | Z80-Boy | I think below 3 pieces no testing is prescribed and above 3 optical I am not sure |
| 11:01.22 | Z80-Boy | One should also check if the gerbers can be loaded into your system. I am using a free software that generates the negative drawing command which some softwares that don |
| 11:01.22 | vedge | what do you mean by optical testing? |
| 11:01.32 | Z80-Boy | t implement RS 274-X completely cannot crunch |
| 11:01.43 | vedge | oh, sure. i'm using my own software for this. |
| 11:01.45 | Z80-Boy | Making a picture of the board and comparing with a reference picture |
| 11:01.51 | Z80-Boy | to find copper bridges gaps etc. |
| 11:02.44 | Z80-Boy | You could even sell with part bags if it were interesting for you, like kits - would be more convenient for the user, would increase interest in the project and sales |
| 11:03.00 | Z80-Boy | Now the interest is going down due to 5GHz WiFi competition. |
| 11:03.14 | Z80-Boy | And because people have to buy all the parts themselves |
| 11:04.17 | Z80-Boy | I hope once maybe someone manages to run a shop like this and sponsor my project so I can improve the kilometers and megabits increase interest and his sales |
| 11:04.23 | Z80-Boy | Kinda mutual symbiosis |
| 11:07.01 | vedge | as far as optical testing goes, i suppose it would depend on the resolution. i don't have a microscope unfortunately. |
| 11:07.22 | Z80-Boy | Or can you manufacture it reliably? |
| 11:07.27 | vedge | i have a machine shop, i could probably manufacture parts but i don't know if it would be cost effective at all. i'd have to look more closely at the model. |
| 11:07.44 | Z80-Boy | I don't mean machine parts, but electronics parts |
| 11:07.52 | Z80-Boy | diodes transistors resistors LEDs HC gates |
| 11:09.40 | vedge | sure, but it's just a matter of cost. my process is reliable but i still need to figure out bare-PCB testing |
| 11:10.38 | vedge | if put a potentially defect board on the pick and place and then functional testing reveals problems i can't really recover the parts. |
| 11:21.15 | Z80-Boy | vedge: I don't mean that you would populate the boards. That would be an unnecessary cost. The user can populate it himself easily. |
| 11:23.34 | vedge | i'm not sure optical comparison would be that useful with my process. i'd expect most defects to involve the vias, as opposed to the surface of the board, unless there are very tiny features. |
| 11:24.12 | Z80-Boy | vedge: I misinformed with an old information. The existing shop apparently already upgraded to Twister2. |
| 11:24.13 | vedge | populating the boards isn't expensive for me if the components are SMT |
| 11:24.55 | Z80-Boy | Some are not |
| 11:25.41 | Z80-Boy | you could pre-populate the SMT ones, though. |
| 11:48.53 | *** join/#brlcad docelic (n=docelic@213.147.110.16) |
| 13:00.15 | Defcon | oem version :D |
| 13:00.19 | Defcon | guess not ^^ |
| 13:01.06 | Maloeran | You think so? I'll look for the usual refund clause in the EULA |
| 13:01.42 | Maloeran | I think the point is mostly to annoy HP for forcing me to buy software I didn't want |
| 13:02.21 | Z80-Boy | Forcing? Noone is forcing you into buying anything :) |
| 13:02.33 | Z80-Boy | You had an option to not buy the whole notbeook |
| 13:03.38 | Defcon | no |
| 13:03.53 | Defcon | there was another case just like this |
| 13:04.04 | Defcon | the guy won like 1200$ back |
| 13:04.13 | minute | wtf? |
| 13:04.20 | Z80-Boy | and how much did he pay for lawyers? |
| 13:04.30 | Defcon | he won |
| 13:04.37 | Defcon | so nothing..? |
| 13:05.01 | Z80-Boy | In such case I prefer designing my own hardware that works 100%. |
| 13:05.12 | Z80-Boy | Courts and lawyers are inherently unreliable and can backfire |
| 13:05.27 | Defcon | indeed |
| 13:05.48 | Z80-Boy | For example since I made myself Ronja, I now don't have to care about NDA binary-only WiFi drivers, bugs in WiFi firmware and how badly they designed their access method |
| 13:06.16 | Maloeran | Z80-Boy, I didn't sign the EULA before buying the laptop |
| 13:06.21 | Maloeran | And there's clearly a refund clause in there |
| 13:06.26 | Z80-Boy | Maloeran: that's good |
| 13:06.53 | Z80-Boy | Maloeran: so you should get your money back easily, shouldn't you |
| 13:07.18 | Maloeran | Theorically, yes. I'm sure they don't enjoy doing this though |
| 13:07.36 | Z80-Boy | Noone enjoys coughing up money |
| 13:07.37 | Defcon | http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/94705/index.html |
| 13:07.50 | Defcon | i thought he got more money than this |
| 13:08.18 | Maloeran | 140 euros, not too bad |
| 13:10.22 | Z80-Boy | Noone should really complain about hardware anymore since we have free software for designing hardware |
| 13:10.23 | Defcon | indeed not |
| 13:10.31 | Z80-Boy | And we have that already for several years |
| 13:10.56 | Defcon | ppl tend to complain very fast |
| 13:11.04 | Z80-Boy | It's like - you don't like Microsoft Windows? Take Linux. If you don't like that one, pimp it up until you like it ;-) |
| 13:11.52 | Maloeran | http://www.rayforce.net/hp000.png |
| 13:11.56 | Z80-Boy | Or like complaining that AutoCAD is crap and not taking BRL-CAD |
| 13:12.03 | Defcon | and what if ppl can't pimp it up |
| 13:12.35 | Defcon | lol Maloeran |
| 13:13.23 | Maloeran | Looks clear enough to me |
| 13:14.00 | Z80-Boy | Doesn't Leninovo sell notebooks without Windows? |
| 13:15.01 | Z80-Boy | By using Vista you agree to a) not have any opinion b) stop thinking c) obey everything Microsoft says d) voluntarily and irrevocably giving up your all human rights to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) |
| 13:15.56 | Defcon | Don't sell your soul to the devil! |
| 13:16.49 | Z80-Boy | I don't like products for whose usage I need a lawyer |
| 13:17.08 | Z80-Boy | Lawyers are expensive and it totals up pretty expensive :) |
| 13:22.40 | Defcon | haha yeah |
| 13:23.45 | Maloeran | The point is more to get these companies to stop trying to force buying software on people |
| 13:24.19 | Maloeran | Although I'm leaving for south america in 4 days, it's not the best timing to begin even a brief legal battle |
| 13:25.36 | Defcon | :D |
| 13:27.49 | minute | Maloeran: They aren't forcing people to buy antyhing. |
| 13:28.20 | minute | You choose to buy a laptop that comes with Vista installed, you could easily choose to purchase a laptop that doesn't. |
| 13:28.32 | Defcon | if you want that particular laptop/.. they are |
| 13:28.52 | Maloeran | minute, there's an EULA that states I can get a refund for it |
| 13:28.53 | Defcon | as a customer you have the right to buy the laptop without software |
| 13:28.57 | Defcon | indeed |
| 13:29.02 | Maloeran | I didn't agree to the EULA before purchasing the laptop |
| 13:29.27 | minute | Maloeran: So get a refund? |
| 13:29.36 | Maloeran | Will try to |
| 13:38.19 | *** join/#brlcad starseeker (n=CY@ip72-218-17-237.hr.hr.cox.net) |
| 13:53.16 | *** join/#brlcad ``Erik (i=erik@c-68-54-174-162.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
| 14:33.55 | *** join/#brlcad starseeker (n=CY@ip72-218-17-237.hr.hr.cox.net) |
| 14:41.32 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54874E5F.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 16:03.00 | *** join/#brlcad Axman6 (n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
| 16:07.22 | *** join/#brlcad Axman6 (n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
| 16:08.28 | *** join/#brlcad jgay (n=jgay@fsf/staff/jgay) |
| 16:37.39 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslc-082-082-068-027.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 18:14.06 | *** join/#brlcad starseeker (n=CY@ip72-218-17-237.hr.hr.cox.net) |
| 19:12.49 | *** join/#brlcad ibot (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
| 19:12.49 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad || Channel logs at http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || BRL-CAD is on scan.coverity.com but still offline || Release 7.12.0 coming soon to a desktop near you |
| 20:18.17 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/misc/win32-msvc8/ (38 files in 38 dirs): Initial check-in. |
| 20:22.00 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/misc/win32-msvc8/brlcad/brlcad.sln: Added 38 more projects. Mostly fb utils and their missing libs. |
| 20:26.52 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/include/config_win.h: Define HAVE_RAND and fmax. |
| 20:29.27 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/include/orle.h: Added ORLE_EXPORT for exposing variables and functions on windows. |
| 20:30.47 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/include/vfont-if.h: Mods to expose vfont_get() and vfont_free() on windows. |
| 20:32.25 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/src/fb/ (8 files): Mods to get things compiling on windows. |
| 20:35.17 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/src/other/libutahrle/include/rle.h: Mods to expose variables and functions. |
| 20:37.47 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/src/other/libutahrle/ (rle_getrow.c rle_open_f.c scanargs.c include/rle_config.h): Mods to get things compiling on windows. |
| 21:30.22 | *** join/#brlcad starseeker (n=CY@ip72-218-17-237.hr.hr.cox.net) |
| 21:59.18 | starseeker | wee |
| 22:10.03 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096667681.dsl.bell.ca) |
| 22:13.38 | *** join/#brlcad docelic (n=docelic@77.237.110.164) |
| 22:16.57 | *** join/#brlcad gabo (n=Miranda@dsl5400725E.pool.t-online.hu) |
| 22:22.20 | *** join/#brlcad yukonbob (n=yukonbob@S010600195bd5c415.lb.shawcable.net) |
| 22:56.58 | CIA-30 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * 10brlcad/misc/win32-msvc8/ (44 files in 44 dirs): Clean up the project files a little. |
| 23:44.25 | yukonbob | yay! Looks like Tcl 8.5.0 out today... |
| 23:49.20 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
