| 00:06.33 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:06.33 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslb-088-071-037-042.pools.arcor-ip.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:07.36 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:12.20 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@88.71.37.42) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:12.20 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:16.29 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@88.71.37.42) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:16.29 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:19.41 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@88.71.37.42) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:19.41 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:22.22 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@88.71.37.42) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:22.22 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:23.38 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:43.24 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@69.255.182.248) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 01:06.59 | *** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
| 01:27.53 | *** join/#brlcad vedge (n=vedge@205-237-251-204.ilesdelamadeleine.ca) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 01:33.50 | *** join/#brlcad ``Erik (i=erik@c-68-54-174-162.hsd1.md.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 02:19.44 | *** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
| 02:38.52 | *** join/#brlcad ``Erik (i=erik@c-68-54-174-162.hsd1.md.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 02:39.30 | brlcad | wee |
| 03:14.55 | andrecastelo | weeee |
| 03:14.57 | andrecastelo | :D |
| 03:15.19 | andrecastelo | hey brlcad , what should i do about functions used both in view.c and viewmlt.c ? |
| 03:15.55 | andrecastelo | for example, i'm going to use scanlines, so free_scanlines() is a nice function to have.. external header? |
| 03:27.47 | brlcad | what do you mean used in both? viewmlt is a separate version of view |
| 03:28.06 | brlcad | utility funcs that view happens to use? |
| 03:28.12 | brlcad | or actual callbacks? |
| 03:28.52 | andrecastelo | utility functions that will be useful in viewmlt, as the view_pixel function will be pretty similar |
| 03:30.23 | brlcad | okay, well for that particular example .. I'd move the scanline struct and the free_scanlines into their own scanline.h/scanline.c files, and reuse |
| 03:30.51 | brlcad | and make a pairing alloc_scanlines() to match the free (presently is inline in view_init2 i think) |
| 03:31.11 | brlcad | other funcs, depends what they do :) |
| 04:23.15 | starseeker | raises eyebrows at Intel's demo of raytraced quake... |
| 04:41.25 | andrecastelo | ok, i'm going to add scanline.c and .h |
| 04:41.46 | andrecastelo | but here in the makefile, there is a line 'EXTRA_PROGRAMS = rtmlt' |
| 04:41.56 | andrecastelo | rtmlt isn't included in the build ? |
| 04:43.55 | andrecastelo | ok, checked the log |
| 04:44.23 | *** join/#brlcad vedge (n=vedge@205-237-251-204.ilesdelamadeleine.ca) |
| 05:23.43 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31410 10/brlcad/trunk/ (7 files in 3 dirs): |
| 05:23.43 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: Added files scanline.c and scanline.h, to contain functions and definitions of |
| 05:23.43 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: scanline, that are shared by view.c and viewmlt.c. Updated msvc9 build files and |
| 05:23.43 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: the Makefile.am. Moved and modified free_scanlines() function to work with |
| 05:23.43 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: parameters (int height and struct scanline* scanline). Updated view_pixel() |
| 05:23.45 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: function in viewmlt.c and made some other minor changes in the file. |
| 05:36.10 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31411 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (scanline.c scanline.h view.c viewmlt.c): Added alloc_scanlines(int, struct scanline*) function and made appropriate changes in view.c and viewmlt.c. |
| 05:38.22 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31412 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/view.c: Removed commented code (that is now alloc_scanlines() ). |
| 05:58.57 | *** join/#brlcad clock_ (n=clock@77-56-95-149.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 07:22.03 | *** join/#brlcad clock_ (n=clock@zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch) |
| 09:17.28 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r31413 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/Makefile.am: libremrt needs stuff moved to scanline. Remove the EXTRA_PROGRAMS thing |
| 09:54.51 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow (n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
| 10:24.10 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslb-088-071-032-132.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 10:29.30 | *** join/#brlcad d_rossberg (n=rossberg@bz.bzflag.bz) |
| 10:35.23 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03d_rossberg * r31414 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/CMakeLists.txt: |
| 10:35.23 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: include new constraint object import export functionality in CMake build |
| 10:35.23 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: we need to include libpc too if any function from this library will be used here |
| 10:59.42 | *** join/#brlcad mafm (n=mafm@elnet-111.lip.pt) |
| 11:00.22 | mafm | hai |
| 11:04.53 | andrecastelo | hai mafm |
| 11:06.04 | ``Erik | <PROTECTED> |
| 11:17.44 | andrecastelo | hey ``Erik good morning :D |
| 11:21.31 | brlcad | howdy folks |
| 11:23.47 | ``Erik | well, it's A morning, that's for sure :) |
| 11:24.30 | mafm | A morning? |
| 11:24.34 | ``Erik | andre: you might have to tweak the msvc proj file to include scanline.c in libremrt (in src/rt) |
| 11:24.57 | ``Erik | I ran into missing symbol issues in src/remrt |
| 11:26.06 | ``Erik | half wonders if some of those functions might be better held in librt |
| 11:28.57 | brlcad | andrecastelo: changes look good, one thing though -- you can use "make distcheck" to do a sanity check when adding new files (needs header) |
| 11:29.29 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5B14F062.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 11:30.18 | ``Erik | heh, doh, I missed that, too :) |
| 11:30.27 | andrecastelo | hmm ok ok |
| 11:32.11 | andrecastelo | libremrt ? |
| 11:32.40 | andrecastelo | or librt ? |
| 11:35.00 | ``Erik | libremrt in src/rt/ |
| 11:35.10 | ``Erik | used by src/remrt/ |
| 11:36.30 | ``Erik | patched it earlier (couple hours ago) |
| 11:37.21 | andrecastelo | ah so it's a new lib? |
| 11:37.59 | andrecastelo | o.O |
| 11:38.01 | ``Erik | uhm, not... new... it's been in src/rt/ as a noinst for quite a while, src/remrt uses it for a lot of rt guts... |
| 11:38.40 | andrecastelo | ok, i'll setup a new project in msvc |
| 11:38.53 | ``Erik | basically rt as a library, so remrt can re-use that code (stuff that might be better in librt *cough*) |
| 11:39.04 | ``Erik | you don't build src/remrt/ in msvc? |
| 11:39.23 | andrecastelo | let me see |
| 11:50.37 | andrecastelo | apparently not o.O |
| 11:54.12 | andrecastelo | this is weird |
| 11:54.34 | ``Erik | ? |
| 11:55.18 | ``Erik | huzzah for bad system calls in ld |
| 12:00.34 | andrecastelo | remrt is described in src/rt/makefile.am, right ? |
| 12:00.39 | andrecastelo | looks |
| 12:01.12 | ``Erik | libremrt is in src/rt/Makefile.am, remrt is in src/remrt/Makefile.am |
| 12:01.33 | ``Erik | remrt uses libremrt to crib rt functionality |
| 12:04.25 | ``Erik | straps some shoes on and drives to "that place", bbiab |
| 12:08.16 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: here's a screenshot of brlcad/brlcadinstall/lib http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/2202/librertnotherewe6.jpg |
| 12:44.36 | brlcad | mafm: you received my memo? |
| 12:46.43 | brlcad | it was basically "check out wmii", there may even be code that you could use (it's certainly small enough) and it has many of the same usability traits as IOE |
| 12:57.16 | mafm | memo? |
| 12:57.21 | mafm | ah, IRC one |
| 13:02.04 | mafm | lol |
| 13:02.04 | mafm | the p9 window manager |
| 13:12.29 | ``Erik | andré, libremrt is a compile time convenience library, it is not intended to be installed. |
| 13:14.19 | mafm | brlcad: did you use wmii? |
| 13:17.00 | brlcad | mafm: i've used it before (long time ago) |
| 13:18.21 | brlcad | I'm just not at a linux desktop frequently these days it seems, one of the other devs uses it fairly regularly |
| 13:18.32 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: i'm having trouble setting it up |
| 13:18.40 | brlcad | (the ioe guy) |
| 13:19.02 | andrecastelo | i've created a new project for libremrt, exports a .dll.. but it's having some problem compiling |
| 13:19.29 | brlcad | you shouldn't need a libremrt |
| 13:19.41 | brlcad | that's just the easy way to put it together in automake |
| 13:19.50 | mafm | which is the interesting part in our perspective? the general layout? the taskbar at the bottom? the tiling of windows? |
| 13:20.20 | brlcad | mafm: "yes" |
| 13:20.26 | andrecastelo | the thing is that remrt isn't there as a vcproj file either |
| 13:20.48 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r31415 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc8/librt/librt.vcproj: Added pc_constraint.c to build. |
| 13:21.33 | brlcad | it has many of the same usability conventions, tiled windows, tabbed contexts, quasi-shaded windows, full keyboard navigation, task/info bar, etc |
| 13:22.22 | ``Erik | um, if remrt is put in, it should have, uhm, all the sources used by libremrt included... like, uh, ...\src\rt\view.c ...\src\rt\shotline.c ... etc |
| 13:22.39 | andrecastelo | hm ok |
| 13:22.49 | ``Erik | looks at the mail list |
| 13:23.14 | ``Erik | tjyang is the one who was arguing for LaTeX instead of docbook? |
| 13:24.01 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31416 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc9/librt/librt.vcproj: Added pc_constraint.c to librt. |
| 13:24.19 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: yup |
| 13:24.37 | mafm | I see |
| 13:24.44 | ``Erik | thinks someone is looking for a large helping of "patches accepted" |
| 13:24.52 | mafm | I'll try to check it out, but I'm fighting with cmake at the moment :) |
| 13:24.55 | ``Erik | or, welcome, rather |
| 13:26.46 | mafm | latex? he must be a mad physicist |
| 13:31.28 | ``Erik | "Can god code something so unusable even he can't use it? No, but I can and so can you: http://www.microsoft.com/careers" |
| 13:32.32 | andrecastelo | lol |
| 13:33.12 | andrecastelo | "We offer opportunities around the world to make an impact with the next generation of technology we're building today." |
| 13:33.16 | andrecastelo | s/building/copying |
| 13:37.19 | mafm | s/copying/borking |
| 13:42.15 | starseeker | LaTeX does offer easier customization on the output side, but that's probably not worth the tradeoff |
| 13:42.42 | starseeker | is still early on the Docbook learning curve, in some respects |
| 13:42.55 | ``Erik | <3 LaTeX for print, and it's web thing isn't too terrible, but has seen docbook work damn well, too *shrug* |
| 13:43.18 | starseeker | is rather surprised by the apparent lack of "here's how to write a docbook file and get a pdf" step by step |
| 13:45.38 | mafm | well, certainly docbook is more writer-friendly :D |
| 13:45.44 | ``Erik | has seen jade->pdf shtuff |
| 13:45.51 | mafm | for non-english texts especially |
| 13:46.58 | starseeker | ``Erik: Occasionally, but not like I would expect - Docbook's "get up and go" threshold is fairly high as compared to LaTeX's |
| 13:47.24 | starseeker | reflects that it does help that ALL of the TeX tools are usually crammed into one huge installation |
| 13:47.54 | ``Erik | pheer the teTeX |
| 13:48.05 | ``Erik | which I guess is deprecated now? heh |
| 13:48.11 | starseeker | :-) |
| 13:48.19 | starseeker | pheer the TeXlive |
| 13:48.41 | ``Erik | lets his package management system worry about all that for him, is old and lazy |
| 13:49.09 | starseeker | I think to do DocLive you would have to bundle java, xml tools, fop, the stylesheets, and lord knows what else |
| 13:49.14 | starseeker | does too |
| 13:49.44 | starseeker | To date, the only successfully running toolchain for docbook that I have working is on my Gentoo box (yay portage!) |
| 13:51.01 | starseeker | meh - firebird seems to be using ant |
| 13:53.40 | starseeker | doesn't want to use ant - I'll concede java as a necessity for fop, but arrgh... |
| 13:53.57 | starseeker | alright, what are they up to here... |
| 13:54.08 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r31417 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc8/rt/rt.vcproj: Added scanline.c to build. |
| 14:03.03 | mafm | about the rt^3 module... should I consider g3d a separate project? |
| 14:03.32 | mafm | I mean so that you can build g3d but not other utilities/whatever inside there |
| 14:32.19 | *** join/#brlcad Axman6 (n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
| 14:37.35 | starseeker | brlcad: do we want to keep all docbook documentation build results (html, pdf, etc.) in the share directory or should we make a /usr/local/doc/brlcad/7.12.4 type layout? |
| 14:55.25 | *** join/#brlcad prasad_ (n=psilva@h-72-245-122-226.mclnva23.covad.net) |
| 15:38.58 | *** join/#brlcad andrecastelo (n=chatzill@189.71.51.90) |
| 15:49.55 | *** join/#brlcad pacman87 (n=timothy@71.170.63.120) |
| 15:56.19 | louipc | starseeker: I'd say leave them in the same place as the .xml after make, then put them into brlcad/doc or brlcad/share/doc on `make install` |
| 15:58.45 | louipc | starseeker: err I wasn't paying attention. Yeah keep them under the brlcad root please :D |
| 16:43.46 | *** join/#brlcad homovulgaris (n=homovulg@202.63.233.61) |
| 16:44.25 | homovulgaris | hi all :) |
| 16:44.47 | louipc | hi |
| 16:44.55 | pacman87 | hello |
| 16:45.33 | homovulgaris | hi pacman how is it going ? :) |
| 16:45.54 | homovulgaris | hi louipc |
| 16:46.05 | louipc | what's up yo |
| 16:46.15 | pacman87 | pretty good. putting the finishing touches on hyp, then optimizing everything |
| 16:46.33 | homovulgaris | have been studying gecode structure for sometime.. they are a generic constraint solver |
| 16:46.54 | homovulgaris | but their architecture is good.. was thinking could use something for geometric constraint solver.. |
| 16:47.44 | homovulgaris | Ideally though i think in effect any constraint solver is in the end generic.. all csps- constraint satisfaction problems can be translated from one "language" to the other |
| 16:48.07 | homovulgaris | pacman87: how are the plans on sweep going ? |
| 16:48.35 | pacman87 | i've kinda put them on hold while finishing hyp |
| 16:48.43 | pacman87 | you have any ideas/suggestions? |
| 16:48.48 | homovulgaris | how exactly would u be storing the dependence between the existing geometry and the new one ( sweep ) ? |
| 16:49.23 | pacman87 | i'm planning on using the sketch to store the outline, and i need to find a way to store the path |
| 16:49.35 | homovulgaris | i mean in the .g .. would it be like a name reference to the sketch object , inside the sweep object repersentation.. |
| 16:49.56 | pacman87 | i need to see how 'extrude' does it |
| 16:50.14 | pacman87 | becasue that's just a sweep in a straight line |
| 16:50.24 | homovulgaris | indeed :) |
| 16:50.46 | louipc | you can extrude a sketch? |
| 16:51.14 | pacman87 | louipc: what else would you do with a sketch? |
| 16:52.45 | louipc | sketch in 2d I suppose |
| 16:52.53 | pacman87 | louipc: yes |
| 16:53.37 | louipc | but that's cool |
| 16:54.01 | homovulgaris | brlcad: i checked out boost interval library.. not very confident it is useful in csp solving .. though still keeping it as an option now..basically the type of intervals i need are for example if x belong to (3,4) and (4,5) the effective domain should be shown as (3,5) or in a sense (3,4) + (4,5) = (3,5) set union basically .. whereas interval arithmetic is basically (3,4) + (4,5) =(7,9) basically the domain of x+y if x and y belong to the respect |
| 16:54.01 | homovulgaris | ive ranges |
| 16:54.10 | homovulgaris | oops :) |
| 16:54.38 | homovulgaris | pacman87: what are sketches themselves made of ? |
| 16:55.01 | homovulgaris | hmm i should read mk_sketch |
| 16:55.08 | homovulgaris | is there one ? |
| 16:55.13 | pacman87 | not sure |
| 16:55.26 | pacman87 | src/librt/primitives/sketch/sketch.c |
| 17:02.14 | homovulgaris | hmm.. splines |
| 17:02.14 | homovulgaris | gecode.org for the constraints thingy i mentioned |
| 17:03.06 | homovulgaris | brlcad: so basically i am writing the interval class myself whose list<> makes the domain |
| 17:05.42 | homovulgaris | pacman: sketches dont have to be closed right? |
| 17:06.02 | homovulgaris | pacman87: and u intend the sweep path to be a 3d curve right ? |
| 17:06.23 | pacman87 | i dont think you can sweep an open sketch |
| 17:06.31 | pacman87 | and sweep path will be 3d |
| 17:06.57 | louipc | I guess it depends on how you sweep it eh? |
| 17:07.18 | homovulgaris | i mean we can sweep an open sketch right ? |
| 17:07.41 | pacman87 | how would you get a 3d solid from sweeping an open sketch? |
| 17:07.46 | louipc | if you're just sweeping along one axis it could be open |
| 17:07.55 | homovulgaris | and regarding 3d i mean ofcourse minimally it would be a 2d curve and maximally 3d :) |
| 17:07.59 | louipc | like turning on a lathe |
| 17:08.07 | homovulgaris | hmmm.. |
| 17:08.30 | homovulgaris | thats revolve right ? |
| 17:09.01 | pacman87 | if you sweep an open sketch, you end up with a surface, not a solid, right? |
| 17:09.13 | homovulgaris | yeah |
| 17:10.43 | pacman87 | a closed sketch is already a surface, so sweeping that gives you the soldi |
| 17:10.46 | pacman87 | solid |
| 17:12.03 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: http://rafb.net/p/G6YzD486.html :O |
| 17:13.58 | homovulgaris | yikes.. this iterator thingy is getting on my nerves i better get back to kicking some c++ butt |
| 17:13.58 | homovulgaris | defining ur own containers is so much like writing a manual :( |
| 17:14.02 | homovulgaris | true |
| 17:14.14 | homovulgaris | pacman87: have u seen this page ? http://www.opencascade.org/showroom/shapefactory/# |
| 17:15.49 | homovulgaris | andrecastelo: huh :O no time.h ??? 0.o |
| 17:16.19 | andrecastelo | apparently no! hehehe |
| 17:16.23 | ``Erik | neato |
| 17:16.35 | ``Erik | netdb.h may be handled by winsock.h on windows, I d'no |
| 17:18.45 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: its weird though, that a module such as remrt wasn't present in the solution file |
| 17:18.50 | andrecastelo | msvc 9 solution file* |
| 17:27.22 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03pacman87 * r31418 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/hyp/hyp.c: implement curve() for hyp, hyp is now fully functional |
| 17:27.44 | pacman87 | optimizations, here i come! |
| 17:29.09 | ``Erik | *shrug* the msvc8 stuff was not ALL of BRL-CAD, bob's still working on making more build on win32 |
| 17:29.26 | ``Erik | and remrt/rtsrv should probably be modified to use libpkg instead of direct sockets |
| 17:47.34 | andrecastelo | ah ok ok |
| 17:47.50 | andrecastelo | should i commit the changes? |
| 17:54.31 | brlcad | starseeker: I believe docs are covered by the --data-dir setting, so somewhere under there |
| 17:54.55 | brlcad | (which is what the Makefile.am's in doc/ already do iirc |
| 18:07.26 | brlcad | homovulgaris: I realize that it wasn't exactly what you needed, but you can get that different range through different operators .. but more a thought of what structures you could leverage |
| 18:07.38 | brlcad | instead of growing everything from scratch, which will be tough |
| 18:07.46 | brlcad | (but also viable solution) |
| 18:10.39 | brlcad | pacman87: I believe extrudes just use a vector, you'l probably want to use spline paths for sweeping (maybe struct curve's) |
| 18:11.50 | pacman87 | brlcad: i was referring more to how the sketch is stored for the extrude |
| 18:12.13 | brlcad | it's "not" |
| 18:12.22 | brlcad | sketches are independent objects |
| 18:12.27 | brlcad | extrudes refer to them by name |
| 18:13.04 | pacman87 | right, that's what i'm planning for rev/sweep, too |
| 18:13.18 | brlcad | sounds like a good plan |
| 18:13.55 | pacman87 | is there a standard set of benchmarks to test my primitive's performance? |
| 18:14.50 | brlcad | andrecastelo: are you creating a new project for remrt? |
| 18:15.18 | brlcad | pacman87: not per-primitive |
| 18:15.34 | brlcad | there are benchmarks that quantify performance for regression purposes |
| 18:15.43 | andrecastelo | brlcad: yes, created and added the sources of libremrt |
| 18:15.44 | brlcad | and testing/optimization, etc |
| 18:16.31 | brlcad | andrecastelo: ah, okay -- those header woes are build system issues -- the sys/time.h header should be wrapped in HAVE_SYS_TIME_H, the netdb.h is probably a missing preprocessor search path |
| 18:17.33 | brlcad | sweeping a non-closed sketch would be invalid -- we don't deal with zero-thickness surfaces |
| 18:30.45 | louipc | ah right you might want a hollow object |
| 18:34.18 | andrecastelo | brlcad: i have a class right now, i'll work on it when i get back :D |
| 18:34.32 | *** join/#brlcad clock_ (n=clock@77-56-72-145.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 18:43.16 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r31419 10/brlcad/trunk/src/mged/ (qray.c setup.c): Temporarily disable qray while transitioning to libged. |
| 19:10.20 | brlcad | pacman87: there are a few remaining polish points for hyp to be "done", if you're interested |
| 19:10.30 | pacman87 | brlcad: sure |
| 19:10.56 | brlcad | nothing critical, you're more than welcome to "move on" too, I can certainly implement them |
| 19:11.43 | pacman87 | well, i ran into a bug somewhere trying to ev a combination |
| 19:13.58 | pacman87 | nmg_region_v_unique(): 2 verts are the same, within tolerance |
| 19:17.50 | brlcad | the ones I noticed are the 'make' comamnd (libged/make.c), 'mirror' (librt/mirror.c), solid edit menu options (mged/edsol.c), and the 'ted' command (mged/tedit.c) |
| 19:18.05 | brlcad | all are pretty easy |
| 19:18.50 | brlcad | interesting about unique vertices .. |
| 19:27.14 | pacman87 | and i'm getting a segfault when raytracing at view.c:1474 |
| 19:27.28 | pacman87 | for all rt's, not just hyp |
| 19:38.29 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03mafm * r31420 10/rt^3/trunk/src/g3d/ (CMakeLists.txt cmake/ cmake/UsePkgConfig.cmake): Preliminary support for CMake, not working yet |
| 19:53.03 | andrecastelo | so the professor couldn't go today :S |
| 19:59.56 | mafm | I feel your sorrow andrecastelo |
| 20:02.58 | mafm | w00t |
| 20:02.59 | mafm | cmake is starting to work :) |
| 20:05.19 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5B14F062.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 20:08.17 | prasad_ | applied for graduation :o |
| 20:08.40 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31421 10/brlcad/trunk/src/remrt/rtsrv.c: Wrapped sys/time.h with HAVE_SYS_TIME_H macro. |
| 20:12.09 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31422 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc9/ (Makefile.am brlcad/brlcad.sln remrt/ remrt/remrt.vcproj): Created remrt project file, with files in src/remrt and the files that belong to libremrt, in src/rt/, and added the .vcproj to the MSVC 9 build. |
| 20:15.59 | mafm | I go now, bye |
| 20:16.07 | brlcad | cya mafm |
| 20:16.11 | brlcad | any progress? :) |
| 20:16.19 | mafm | it compiles in cmake |
| 20:16.27 | brlcad | cool |
| 20:16.36 | brlcad | building just the g3d dir sources? |
| 20:16.39 | mafm | yes |
| 20:16.47 | brlcad | okay |
| 20:16.48 | mafm | I asked about that before, let me find |
| 20:17.10 | brlcad | should you consider it a separate project? no |
| 20:17.20 | mafm | <mafm> about the rt^3 module... should I consider g3d a separate project? |
| 20:17.25 | mafm | <mafm> I mean so that you can build g3d but not other utilities/whatever inside there |
| 20:17.27 | brlcad | it *is* the project |
| 20:17.46 | brlcad | the other dirs/folders are very closely related |
| 20:17.59 | brlcad | the "rt^3" name is just misleading |
| 20:18.02 | mafm | so basically all the rt^3 "module" is for g3d? |
| 20:21.53 | mafm | well, be back tomorrow anyway :) |
| 20:21.56 | mafm | cheers |
| 20:52.00 | *** join/#brlcad homovulgaris (n=homovulg@202.63.233.61) |
| 21:06.48 | pacman87 | andrecastelo: i think your changes to view.c broke rt |
| 21:07.44 | andrecastelo | pacman87: hmm, what's happening? it isn't compiling ? |
| 21:07.59 | pacman87 | no, it compiles |
| 21:08.03 | pacman87 | but rt fails |
| 21:08.31 | andrecastelo | seg fault? |
| 21:08.34 | pacman87 | yeah |
| 21:12.12 | andrecastelo | hm, did you try reverting ? |
| 21:12.44 | pacman87 | yeah, it works for rev 31409 |
| 21:15.01 | andrecastelo | ok, i'll take a look |
| 21:31.35 | andrecastelo | ok, fixed |
| 21:31.44 | andrecastelo | just reviewing and will commit |
| 21:33.53 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31423 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (scanline.c scanline.h view.c): Fixed a bug in rt that had to do with scanlines. The memory allocation function now returns a pointer. Checks to see if scanline already exists were added. |
| 21:36.01 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31424 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/viewmlt.c: Fixed scanline functions and added checks in memory allocation. Did some irrelevant formatting and added a bit more to view_pixel(). |
| 21:37.40 | pacman87 | viewmlt.c: In function 'view_pixel': |
| 21:37.40 | pacman87 | viewmlt.c:184: error: 'width' undeclared (first use in this function) |
| 21:39.37 | CIA-22 | BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31425 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/viewmlt.c: Fixed a minor bug - int width not declared. |
| 21:39.52 | andrecastelo | my bad :S |
| 21:39.56 | andrecastelo | did you try rt ? |
| 21:40.06 | pacman87 | that's why i generally compile before committing |
| 21:40.34 | andrecastelo | yeah, i do that too, just missed this time |
| 21:41.24 | andrecastelo | anyways, i'll have to leave now |
| 21:41.28 | andrecastelo | will be back later |
| 21:41.30 | andrecastelo | cya |
| 21:41.32 | pacman87 | bye |
| 22:05.42 | *** join/#brlcad tjyang (n=tjyang@c-71-194-123-60.hsd1.il.comcast.net) |
| 22:24.20 | ``Erik | thinks you should compile and try running stuff you may've impacted before compiling |
| 22:24.59 | ``Erik | like view/viewmlt/scanline shoulda seen test runs of rt, rtmlt and remrt/rtsrv :) |
| 22:26.00 | ``Erik | er |
| 22:26.03 | ``Erik | before committing |
| 22:33.02 | ``Erik | "what good is mining nose-gold if I can't share it with the towns-people???" |
| 22:34.32 | andrecastelo | ``Erik: yeah Erik, i usually compile stuff and try a few runs (viewarea for example), but totally forgot this time o.O |
| 22:35.00 | ``Erik | *shrug* eventually, it should become pretty much automatic, muscle-memory |
| 22:35.14 | andrecastelo | i'll work on it ;) |
| 22:35.17 | ``Erik | but I've committed without even doing the "does it compile" test just recently, so'z *shrug* :) it happens |
| 22:38.13 | ``Erik | nice, a bf2c compiler written in bf |
| 22:38.19 | ``Erik | http://www.hevanet.com/cristofd/brainfuck/dbf2c.b |
| 22:48.04 | poolio | howdy all |
| 22:49.15 | ``Erik | greetings, ben |
| 22:51.02 | poolio | ah it is quite bizarre reading my real name on IRC, hi ``Erik. How's the office? |
| 22:53.48 | ``Erik | the office is 20 miles over that way *point* so I'm happy :D |
| 23:20.25 | brlcad | yay for problems getting fixed before I get to compile |
| 23:35.40 | *** join/#brlcad dtidrow_ (n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
