| 00:19.22 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50600 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/lib/ (PictureTypeB.itcl PictureTypeC.itcl PictureTypeD.itcl): Make picture types B, C and D use rtimage |
| 00:29.18 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50601 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/lib/PictureTypeE.itcl: Picture type E converted |
| 00:38.35 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50602 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/lib/PictureTypeD.itcl: Fix background color for type D picture |
| 00:40.28 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50603 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/lib/PictureTypeF.itcl: And last but not least, type F images |
| 00:45.46 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50604 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/lib/ (PictureTypeBase.itcl tclIndex): Remove some unused commands |
| 00:54.01 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50605 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/rtwizard.tcl: Add option for perspective, although it doesn't seem to interact well with zoom for some reason |
| 00:56.12 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50606 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/rtwizard.tcl: Ah - just needed to crank it into the initial view setup |
| 00:57.01 | starseeker | Still needs a lot more testing and documentation work, but now the NEWS item about PNG should properly apply |
| 02:23.14 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (~louipc@archlinux/fellow/louipc) |
| 02:39.10 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50607 10/brlcad/trunk/NEWS: rtwizard now properly supports PNG output from all of its image types. Bob's new tcl proc cadwidgets::RtImage is the heart of the new features. |
| 03:01.37 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50608 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/rtwizard/rtwizard.tcl: remove debugging puts statement |
| 03:30.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r50609 10/brlcad/trunk/NEWS: |
| 03:30.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: tom added an italian translation of the intro to brl-cad. do not know who the |
| 03:30.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: original author is. my records indicate it dates back to at least sometime |
| 03:30.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: before july 2007 but is an unattributed contribution. files had not identifying |
| 03:30.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: markers and no other record in my logs all the way back to 2004. |
| 05:24.39 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03phoenixyjll * r50610 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/hyp/hyp_brep.cpp: Fixed the direction of shearing the hyp. |
| 05:30.05 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Phoenix 07http://brlcad.org * r3677 10/wiki/User:Phoenix/GSoc2012/Reports: /* Community Bonding */ |
| 05:49.04 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@117.192.128.176) |
| 06:14.43 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Stattrav 07http://brlcad.org * r3678 10/wiki/User:Stattrav/GSoC2012_log: Updation of logs |
| 06:26.35 | *** join/#brlcad archivist (~archivist@host81-149-189-98.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 06:42.51 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@117.192.128.176) |
| 06:56.01 | *** join/#brlcad d_rossberg (~rossberg@BZ.BZFLAG.BZ) |
| 07:38.05 | *** join/#brlcad KimK (~Kim__@2001:470:1f0f:1042:4261:86ff:fe43:bcad) |
| 07:57.44 | *** join/#brlcad stas (~stas@82.208.133.12) |
| 08:21.43 | *** join/#brlcad KimK (~Kim__@209.248.147.2.nw.nuvox.net) |
| 08:36.07 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Best (~Al_Da_Bes@elvyn-248-109.halls.student.lut.ac.uk) |
| 10:23.27 | *** join/#brlcad cristina_ (~cristina@188.24.66.147) |
| 10:46.26 | *** join/#brlcad kane_ (~Mesut@e181169167.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 11:18.24 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@223.235.172.114) |
| 11:22.16 | Stattrav_ | the benchmark for sphflake fails after the recent updates |
| 11:23.39 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@223.235.172.114) |
| 11:47.32 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@223.235.172.114) |
| 12:23.25 | brlcad | Stattrav: hm, good to know -- did you isolate the commit that causes the failure? |
| 12:23.37 | brlcad | and did you get the two images starseeker pasted earlier? |
| 13:19.31 | *** join/#brlcad crdueck__ (~AndChat43@184.151.61.79) |
| 13:21.10 | brlcad | morning crdueck__ |
| 13:21.13 | Al_Da_Best | kane_: Did you say you managed to compile brl-cad with bullet? I'm running into a lot of errors when trying to do so, could do with some advice |
| 13:21.56 | brlcad | the vm image has a bullet-enabled compile included, could inspect it for reference |
| 13:22.40 | Al_Da_Best | Yeah I have done. As far as I can tell my CMake is setup correctly, going by the cmakecache on the VM, but visual studio is having issues |
| 13:22.46 | crdueck__ | brlcad: morning, have you gotten a chance to take a look at the patch I submitted on SF? |
| 13:23.33 | *** join/#brlcad AndChat-430625 (~AndChat43@184.151.61.29) |
| 13:27.46 | *** join/#brlcad crdueck__ (~AndChat43@184.151.61.29) |
| 13:55.59 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r50611 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libtclcad/tclcad_obj.c: Simplified to_png(). Added to_pix(). Not tested on Windows. |
| 13:57.17 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r50612 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/lib/Ged.tcl: Added cadwidgets::Ged::pix. |
| 14:10.12 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r50613 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libtclcad/tclcad_obj.c: More simplification of to_png() and to_pix(). |
| 14:25.05 | starseeker | Al_Da_Best: so far as I know, the bullet stuff has never been tried on Windows before |
| 14:25.13 | starseeker | not surprising there would be issue |
| 14:25.24 | starseeker | or issues even |
| 14:26.53 | Al_Da_Best | Yeah that's what I thought. I'll check that its not my configuration before diving in and trying to fix things that aren't broken, should be moving to a fresh install of windows+vs2010 when I get round to it, which would be ideal for testing |
| 14:28.38 | kane_ | Al_Da_Best: I have tried it with the Bulletlibraries, i got 61 build-errors |
| 14:29.04 | Al_Da_Best | Ah :P Yeah I get similar amounts. Oki, I'll try and work out why :D |
| 14:38.37 | *** join/#brlcad Al_DC_Mobile (~Al_Da_Bes@2001:630:301:9110:f0fa:9bcd:9fc8:1e4e) |
| 15:10.51 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Mobile (~Al_Da_Bes@2001:630:301:9110:b553:a4e8:6a5f:ce27) |
| 15:19.33 | *** join/#brlcad ibot (~ibot@rikers.org) |
| 15:19.33 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || Congratulations to our 11 accepted GSoC students!! |
| 15:22.52 | *** join/#brlcad crdueck__ (~AndChat43@184.151.61.29) |
| 15:34.10 | brlcad | crdueck__: not yet |
| 15:35.21 | brlcad | I usually try to let other devs get first dibs, but I'll take a look if nobody else comments soon |
| 15:40.31 | crdueck__ | brlcad: alright thanks |
| 15:42.09 | Stattrav | brlcad: yes |
| 15:42.25 | brlcad | crdueck__: so one issue I notice right off the bat is that you've had 9 patch submissions |
| 15:42.54 | brlcad | 5 of which are "invalid" or deleted or rejected |
| 15:43.13 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@117.192.143.52) |
| 15:43.18 | Stattrav | brlcad: doing a binary search on the commits between them I checked r 50443 |
| 15:43.23 | Stattrav | that was working fine |
| 15:44.09 | brlcad | crdueck__: that's usually a sign that you're not thinking through or testing your own patch before submitting it, so a little more rigor on your end is probably warranted |
| 15:44.52 | brlcad | don't want to be in a situation where 5/9ths of your commits are problematic .. that'd be quite a bit of havoc :) |
| 15:45.38 | brlcad | Stattrav: do you know how to binary search efficiently or are you doing full-blown checkouts each time? :) |
| 15:46.02 | Stattrav | brlcad: svn update -r <r.no> |
| 15:46.19 | brlcad | okay, good just checking |
| 15:46.21 | Stattrav | brlcad: svn update -r <revison no> <- this was what I was doing. so yeah |
| 15:55.22 | crdueck__ | brlcad: agreed, i'll try to be more thourough in the future and especially when committing |
| 15:57.53 | brlcad | crdueck__: that said, I'm hoping you have reviewed your four patches that are open to make sure they don't have obvious room for improvement, like wrong style or not compiling, etc |
| 15:59.31 | brlcad | if a patch has an issue, you do not need to close out the patch tracker, just add a new attachment and mark it v2 or similar |
| 16:05.59 | crdueck__ | i dont believe there's any obvious issues with the open patches, but i'll look them over again when i get the chance. i'm away from my desktop at the moment |
| 16:07.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r50614 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libtclcad/tclcad_obj.c: Added calls to glPixelStorei(GL_PACK_ALIGNMENT, 1) in both to_png() and to_pix(). |
| 17:06.37 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Mobile (~Al_Da_Bes@2001:630:301:9110:69b9:8754:c10d:fc6f) |
| 18:08.24 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Mobile (~Al_Da_Bes@2001:630:301:9110:69b9:8754:c10d:fc6f) |
| 19:09.07 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksu@46.149.81.166) |
| 19:39.44 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Ksuzee 07http://brlcad.org * r3679 10/wiki/User:Ksuzee/Reports: |
| 19:40.22 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Ksuzee 07http://brlcad.org * r3680 10/wiki/User:Ksuzee/Reports: |
| 19:41.06 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Ksuzee 07http://brlcad.org * r3681 10/wiki/User:Ksuzee/Reports: |
| 19:41.46 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Ksuzee 07http://brlcad.org * r3682 10/wiki/User:Ksuzee/Reports: |
| 19:46.29 | brlcad | ksuzee: so curious, what criteria are you using for selecing these reductions? |
| 19:51.54 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r3683 10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2012: move additional info to the end, prep for announcement |
| 19:56.16 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r3684 10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2012: deengrishify |
| 20:03.31 | *** join/#brlcad DarkCalf (~DarkCalf@173.231.40.99) |
| 20:13.49 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r50615 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/ell/ell.c: apply sf patch 3515075 (rt_ell_surface_area) from crdueck adding support for calculating ellipsoid surface areas. |
| 20:39.16 | Stattrav | brlcad: 50580 works fine and 50581 breaks |
| 20:45.34 | brlcad | Stattrav: that can't be right |
| 20:46.03 | brlcad | 50580 and 50581 are both edits to our release notes text file, having nothing to do with runtime behavior |
| 20:46.34 | Stattrav | wait or 582 |
| 20:46.43 | brlcad | well which is it? :) |
| 20:46.50 | Stattrav | let me check that once :P |
| 20:47.28 | Stattrav | did somebody else report that the benchmark test is reporting that sphflake is throwing out the error ? |
| 20:47.37 | brlcad | actually, I'll buy 50582 breaking sphflake -- let me read into it |
| 20:51.20 | brlcad | Stattrav: you don't have a patch yet, do you? want to try and tackle that one now that you have it isolated? |
| 20:51.39 | brlcad | I can certainly explain it to help make it easy if that commit really did break sphflake |
| 20:52.49 | brlcad | actually I think I already see the bug |
| 20:53.32 | Stattrav | brlcad: let me confirm once |
| 20:53.43 | Stattrav | as in let me check that once again. |
| 20:53.56 | brlcad | sure, but I'm pretty sure I see why it's failing |
| 20:54.49 | Stattrav | I am checking 50580 |
| 20:54.58 | brlcad | yeah, that's the issue -- no worries, not even patch-worthy because the edit was just wrong |
| 20:56.02 | Stattrav | 580 is good |
| 20:56.34 | Stattrav | 582 had a change in parse.c |
| 20:58.08 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r50616 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/parse.c: Revert r50582 as it was just wrong. 'shader' is the whole string, not just the name. |
| 20:58.49 | Stattrav | cool, I shall test 50616 now |
| 21:01.31 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r50617 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/parse.c: go ahead and still make the comparison case insensitive. thanks to Stattrav (via irc) for pinpointing the cause of sphflake failure introduced by r50582. |
| 21:02.15 | Stattrav | Yaay! my first useful contribution. |
| 21:02.38 | ksuzee | hello |
| 21:03.18 | ksuzee | Sean, I've just read you wrote me) |
| 21:03.25 | Stattrav | Now, I shall get down to writing the patch. |
| 21:05.03 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@117.192.143.52) |
| 21:07.18 | brlcad | Stattrav_: so what patch are you working on? |
| 21:08.54 | Stattrav | the same thing pixcmp.c, couldn't find the bug w.r.t starseeker 's image with normal testing, seeing into it now. Instead I want to write the off-by-<val> where val is specified by -d |
| 21:09.34 | Stattrav | by write the off-by-<val>, I meant implement that feature |
| 21:14.15 | starseeker | src/libbu/parse.c:1767:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bu_strnasecmp’ |
| 21:14.35 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r50618 10/brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/mged/skt_ed.tcl: |
| 21:14.36 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: qualify all of the calls to the dist proc as being in the top-level namespace. |
| 21:14.36 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: apparently if you qualify one in a proc, but not others, some version(s) of tcl |
| 21:14.36 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: assume the non-qualified one are for a non top-level scope even if a local one |
| 21:14.36 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: doesn't exist. problem reported by Csanyi Pal via brlcad-users mailing list |
| 21:14.36 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: trying to use sketch editor. |
| 21:15.57 | starseeker | oh, I see |
| 21:16.15 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r50619 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/parse.c: looks like a typo? |
| 21:20.33 | brlcad | oops, sorry about that -- didn't have a build to compile-test that on yet |
| 21:25.17 | brlcad | ksuzee: so you read it, do you intend to reply? :) |
| 21:26.32 | brlcad | Stattrav: if you can't reproduce the bug under normal use, that may imply reader error or platform-specific conditions -- no need to go on a witch hunt for it ;) |
| 21:26.45 | ksuzee | oh, yes)) I didn't want to interrupt you=) |
| 21:26.51 | ksuzee | well, |
| 21:27.08 | Stattrav_ | brlcad: ahaha, sure. |
| 21:27.26 | brlcad | ksuzee: it's not an interruption |
| 21:27.34 | brlcad | multithreaded group discussion ;) |
| 21:27.37 | Stattrav_ | oh god, I am replying from two places, browser and irssi, shall switch to irccloud |
| 21:28.41 | ksuzee | ok:) I made the file which contains duplications for every folder in /src |
| 21:29.54 | ksuzee | and now I'm searching the most obvious situations |
| 21:30.20 | ksuzee | in this files |
| 21:30.58 | ksuzee | I think this one https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3528023&group_id=105292&atid=640804 |
| 21:31.04 | ksuzee | is important |
| 21:31.28 | ksuzee | the previouse one is just an example from my proposal |
| 21:32.39 | brlcad | it's actually an interesting social bias in play that I found interesting with the htonf.c change |
| 21:33.03 | brlcad | I knew/know about that duplication |
| 21:33.11 | brlcad | it's goes WAY back 15+ years |
| 21:33.36 | ksuzee | eee |
| 21:33.38 | brlcad | left it in there just because it was so old, but technically there's no reason for it |
| 21:33.59 | brlcad | so it's nice to see your new eyes questioning its existence |
| 21:34.38 | ksuzee | these functions were absolutly similar |
| 21:35.07 | ksuzee | but after making...I saw everything you told me before=) |
| 21:37.34 | ksuzee | about my previous patch I mean |
| 21:38.11 | Stattrav | brilliant, the benchmark tests on 50619 are good. thanks starseeker and brlcad. |
| 21:42.07 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav_ (~Stattrav@117.192.143.52) |
| 21:48.44 | brlcad | Stattrav: aha, I found the bug |
| 21:48.55 | brlcad | it's actually in the pixdiff utility, not pixcmp |
| 21:49.11 | brlcad | moreover, the summary differences reported by the two don't match each other: |
| 21:49.28 | brlcad | [sean@gcc1-power7 .cmake]$ bin/pixcmp eto_implicit.pix eto_brep.pix |
| 21:49.29 | brlcad | pixcmp pixels: 206784 matching, 31160 off by 1, 24200 off by many |
| 21:49.37 | brlcad | [sean@gcc1-power7 .cmake]$ bin/pixdiff eto_implicit.pix eto_brep.pix |bin/pix-png -o diff.png |
| 21:49.40 | brlcad | pixdiff bytes: 702101 matching, 84304 off by 1, 27 off by many |
| 21:49.57 | Stattrav_ | aah :D |
| 21:49.59 | brlcad | so not a bug-perse because pixdiff does qualify and say bytes |
| 21:50.14 | brlcad | but they are different, which is cause for concern |
| 21:50.27 | brlcad | probably only/best solved by fully merging the two tools |
| 21:50.52 | Stattrav_ | ohh. so what do you suggest I do now, work on it ? |
| 21:51.22 | brlcad | adding the off-by-# option is a fine simple patch to start with regardless |
| 21:52.25 | brlcad | dc |
| 21:52.57 | Stattrav_ | cool. that would be the thing I shall work on. |
| 21:54.11 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Stattrav 07http://brlcad.org * r3685 10/wiki/User:Stattrav/GSoC2012: Pointer changed in the roadmap |
| 21:54.25 | ksuzee | so what shall I do with this "good old" duplication? =) |
| 21:54.28 | Stattrav_ | I could actually look into fixing that a bit later though |
| 21:59.23 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Stattrav 07http://brlcad.org * r3686 10/wiki/User:Stattrav/GSoC2012_log: Updation of logs |
| 22:51.22 | CIA-65 | BRL-CAD: 03Anuragmurty 07http://brlcad.org * r3687 10/wiki/User:Anuragmurty: /* community bonding period */ |
| 23:53.48 | *** join/#brlcad crdueck__ (~AndChat43@184.151.61.220) |