| 00:38.05 | CIA-55 | BRL-CAD: 03Cprecup 07http://brlcad.org * r4361 10/wiki/User:Cprecup/GSoC2012_progress: 17/08/2012 - introduced the "graph" command and a subcommand |
| 01:05.56 | starseeker | brlcad: don't worry, I wasn't going to start investigating it |
| 01:07.00 | starseeker | not that old is necessarily bad, but its license has an advertising clause in it |
| 01:07.11 | starseeker | and I doubt it does anything we don't already do for ourselves |
| 01:11.47 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@75-1-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 02:04.46 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@155-101-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 02:23.20 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (~louipc@archlinux/fellow/louipc) |
| 04:48.21 | CIA-55 | BRL-CAD: 03crdueck * r52117 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/bot/bot.c: fixed memory leak, some other minor changes |
| 06:07.41 | *** join/#brlcad archivist (~archivist@host81-149-189-98.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 08:10.15 | *** join/#brlcad elf_ (~elf@p22.eregie.pub.ro) |
| 09:16.13 | *** join/#brlcad stas (~stas@82.208.133.12) |
| 09:19.32 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.107.42) |
| 09:29.02 | *** join/#brlcad archivist (~archivist@host81-149-189-98.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 10:01.39 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.107.42) |
| 12:12.10 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav (u3131@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hjgrpyembujljntd) |
| 13:39.26 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.107.42) |
| 14:33.16 | *** join/#brlcad andrei (~andrei@79.117.233.10) |
| 14:59.48 | andrei | hello! |
| 15:00.06 | andrei | aside of 0, what can I pass as a parameter for a function using : void (*errlog) (char *msg). |
| 15:00.17 | andrei | I don t understand the type |
| 15:01.54 | andrei | <PROTECTED> |
| 15:05.52 | andrei | nevermind, fixed it. |
| 17:55.09 | *** join/#brlcad archivist (~archivist@host81-149-189-98.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 18:06.29 | *** join/#brlcad Yoshi47 (~jan@d24-204-236-81.home4.cgocable.net) |
| 18:08.20 | *** join/#brlcad stas (~stas@86.122.32.42) |
| 18:25.46 | brlcad | andrei: that's a function callback, it takes a function as a parameter |
| 18:26.07 | brlcad | so you could pass printf, for example |
| 18:26.43 | andrei | I did that :) |
| 18:27.44 | brlcad | cristina: it sounds like you didn't register the command somewhere for archer |
| 18:28.24 | brlcad | i don't recall off the top of my head, but you can try searching for a similar command such as "facetize" |
| 18:28.55 | brlcad | andrei: I'm going to have a little bit of time to review some patches this weekend -- which of yours should I start with first |
| 18:29.26 | andrei | I think you should start with the test_rbtree, it should be easiest to review ( even tho it has nothing to do with the project) |
| 18:29.31 | andrei | and afterwards, the test units |
| 18:29.42 | andrei | I need to re-upload them |
| 18:30.23 | andrei | Speaking of re-upload, I introduced some code duplication ( in some of the tests). For example, I needed the callbacks from pkg.c for pkg_getclient |
| 18:30.26 | andrei | how should I proceed? |
| 18:33.13 | andrei | or I have a display function common to around 5 tests. Should I move that to pkg.h ? |
| 18:34.48 | cristina | brlcad: Hello, I looked over other commands and registered in in the same folders |
| 18:35.06 | cristina | s/folders/files |
| 18:35.33 | *** join/#brlcad stas (~stas@188.24.40.47) |
| 18:46.30 | *** join/#brlcad stas (~stas@188.24.42.87) |
| 19:16.06 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.105.83) |
| 19:32.10 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.105.83) |
| 19:47.23 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.105.83) |
| 20:45.06 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@155-101-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 22:12.15 | andrei | brlcad : I finished re editing both unit tests and the fixes, they should be ready to be reviewed / commited. Aside of that there are two unit tests that aren't in patch format, I need a bit of help with them. I can t unit test pkg_waitfor since it doesn't end. |
| 22:12.58 | andrei | also, I m getting some pretty wierd memory leaks on test_pkg_send and I don t know why, it just displays some gibberish |
| 22:24.23 | andrei | There are some unit tests where there isn't a bu_free after memory allocation. The reason is that the functions contain it. |
| 22:50.07 | andrei | the best order for review is, I think : red-black tree test -> unit tests -> pkg fixes |
| 23:29.34 | *** part/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@193.151.105.83) |