| 02:59.08 | *** join/#brlcad hsrai_ (~hsrai@202.164.53.116) |
| 03:01.39 | hsrai_ | Gauravjeet Singh who did 6 tasks of GCI, out of which 3 were for BRL-CAD, has done one more excellent thing. Check: http://cad.devplace.in/form.html play by changing values, on submission you will get 4 views of "Table". Code is at: https://github.com/GreatDevelopers/wBRLCAD |
| 03:04.32 | *** join/#brlcad hsrai (~hsrai@202.164.53.116) |
| 03:45.29 | *** join/#brlcad EricPoehlsen (~Eric@dslb-084-056-082-235.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 04:08.39 | maths22 | hsrai: that's cool! |
| 05:18.45 | brlcad | hsrai: thanks for sharing that, really awesome |
| 06:10.50 | *** join/#brlcad EricPoehlsen (~Eric@ip-109-41-149-226.web.vodafone.de) |
| 13:11.19 | ``Erik | hmmmm add_custom_target(dist COMMAND ${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM} package_source) |
| 13:41.02 | *** join/#brlcad EricPoehlsen (~Eric@ip-109-46-82-213.web.vodafone.de) |
| 13:51.07 | *** join/#brlcad Skriptkid (~Skriptkid@117.208.166.10) |
| 14:06.01 | *** join/#brlcad luca79 (~luca@net-37-116-119-195.cust.dsl.vodafone.it) |
| 15:46.10 | brlcad | ``Erik: sounds like a good alias to add to me |
| 15:51.19 | *** join/#brlcad luca79 (~luca@net-37-116-119-195.cust.dsl.vodafone.it) |
| 15:58.51 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Best (~Al_Da_Bes@cpc2-shep12-2-0-cust21.8-3.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 16:50.38 | *** join/#brlcad EricPoehlsen (~Eric@dslb-084-056-082-235.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 16:59.46 | *** join/#brlcad caen23 (~cezar@92.81.175.131) |
| 17:00.39 | kanzure | https://github.com/GreatDevelopers/wBRLCAD/blob/master/table |
| 17:00.43 | kanzure | that.. that does not look good. |
| 17:00.56 | kanzure | how is that "excellent" |
| 17:08.53 | brlcad | kanzure: so.. you're working on something better right? :) |
| 17:09.25 | kanzure | huh? brlcad already has a working scripting language |
| 17:09.39 | kanzure | there's no reason to throw it all away |
| 17:09.39 | brlcad | I think it's awesome if only because the end result is something that nobody else has done before |
| 17:09.48 | kanzure | cgi? |
| 17:09.51 | brlcad | the system is meant to be scripted just like that |
| 17:09.56 | kanzure | you're fooling yourself if you think cgi is new |
| 17:10.03 | brlcad | hm? |
| 17:10.07 | kanzure | anyway, i am just cranky that i clicked and saw that |
| 17:10.22 | kanzure | shapesmith at least bothers to send objects as json between the client and server |
| 17:10.31 | kanzure | (not that json is the important part; it's the messages/transactions that matter) |
| 17:11.03 | caen23 | he was talking about the end product, not code… it's html and some bash, it wasn't the code that was excellent |
| 17:11.25 | brlcad | this has absolutely nothing to do with cgi |
| 17:11.49 | kanzure | ok what was excellent then |
| 17:12.34 | brlcad | that a high school student was able to figure out all the pieces to interactively create and render geometry on top of a fairly complex system, and do that in the span of just a couple days |
| 17:12.53 | kanzure | ageism is the worst. |
| 17:13.06 | brlcad | wtf |
| 17:13.14 | kanzure | anyway, i guess it would have been helpful to say "it's excellent because he's young" |
| 17:13.27 | kanzure | that would have put it in more context to see why anyone would think it's that |
| 17:13.32 | brlcad | it would have been excellent had anyone done it |
| 17:13.36 | kanzure | really?? |
| 17:14.30 | brlcad | but knowing that he's inexperienced does make it more interesting if only because I'd rather encourage someone inexperienced to become more experienced than piss in their cheerios because someone somewhere has a better idea |
| 17:14.36 | kanzure | anyway, when he's around could you ping me? if he wants to make web things with brlcad, i think there's some better things he could be implementing. |
| 17:15.25 | ``Erik | *cough* *cough* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scaAz1zcdXI *cough* |
| 17:16.17 | kanzure | i mean, if he wants guidance on how to make brlcad instances usable through a browser safely |
| 17:16.20 | kanzure | or something like that |
| 17:17.12 | ``Erik | he made an mvp, dude |
| 17:17.39 | kanzure | i would have serious hesitations about rolling that into the brlcad repo |
| 17:17.49 | kanzure | wait, i mean i do have |
| 17:19.08 | caen23 | do you really have nothing better to do than comment on some code written in a few days by a high school student? code which, by the way, no one is rolling anywhere… |
| 17:19.41 | kanzure | yes, i think code review is super important |
| 17:20.28 | caen23 | it's not called code review if you're ranting without the person being present |
| 17:20.47 | kanzure | he's not present? |
| 17:22.03 | caen23 | do you see him answering your "review"? |
| 17:22.29 | brlcad | kanzure: questioning others for finding it cool and interesting when you did not is far from a code review |
| 17:22.43 | kanzure | ok let's try this a different way. what is the actual argument for committing this? |
| 17:22.54 | ``Erik | no one has made that argument |
| 17:23.22 | kanzure | okay. |
| 17:23.45 | brlcad | expressing your dissatisfaction is similarly not be a useful criticism |
| 17:25.27 | brlcad | that is the student's own github repo, and good for him for committing his work to a version control system |
| 17:25.30 | brlcad | people should do that more often |
| 17:29.01 | brlcad | if you think you could actually achieve what the student did with a better design or fewer lines of code, I'd be interested in seeing that |
| 17:29.17 | brlcad | not hearing about it though, ideas are easy, talk is cheap |
| 17:29.50 | brlcad | but then if someone wants to go down that route, there are other tasks that would be more in line with our long-term goals |
| 18:50.14 | *** join/#brlcad luca79 (~luca@net-37-116-119-195.cust.dsl.vodafone.it) |
| 22:32.09 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:brlcad * 54198 brlcad/trunk/src/util/bombardier.c: clean up the wording a little bit |