| 00:19.28 | g4lt | !listkyes broken in sid |
| 00:19.33 | g4lt | !listkeys broken in sid |
| 00:19.35 | dpkg | Factoid search of 'broken in sid' by key returned no results. |
| 00:20.53 | g4lt | !broken in sid is <reply>well, duh, what'd you expect, of course it's broken. see unstable |
| 00:20.53 | dpkg | g4lt: okay |
| 00:21.05 | g4lt | !broken in sid |
| 00:21.05 | dpkg | well, duh, what'd you expect, of course it's broken. see unstable |
| 00:21.22 | g4lt | !unstable |
| 00:21.22 | dpkg | hmm... unstable is the status of a Debian release when packages can be added to the system at any time that might disrupt the integrity of the whole system! Ask me about <break>. not supported here, in general. It's also newspeak for not stable If you have to ask whether you should use unstable, you shouldn't. See testing. see sid |
| 00:21.31 | g4lt | !sid |
| 00:21.31 | dpkg | hmm... sid is the unstable version of Debian. Commonly [and wrongly] backronymmed Still In Development. It's actually named for the destructive neighbor kid in Toy Story. Ask me about unstable. Do not use sid unless you have the skill to find your way out of the mess that broken packages may put you in. <g4lt> THERE IS NO OFFICIAL WAY TO INSTALL SID, FOR THE BILLIONTH TIME |
| 00:22.20 | g4lt | !sid =~ s/<g4lt> THERE IS NO OFFICIAL WAY TO INSTALL SID, FOR THE BILLIONTH TIME// |
| 00:22.20 | dpkg | OK, g4lt |
| 00:22.44 | g4lt | !broken in sid =~ s/unstable/sid/ |
| 00:22.44 | dpkg | OK, g4lt |
| 00:53.32 | *** join/#debian-bots pumbaa (blootbot@134.50.70.17) |
| 00:53.48 | g4lt | %sid =~ s/<g4lt> THERE IS NO OFFICIAL WAY TO INSTALL SID, FOR THE BILLIONTH TIME// |
| 00:53.49 | pumbaa | g4lt: i didn't have anything called 'sid' |