| 02:02.58 | *** join/#debianppc vi-config (n=jalandu@74-138-212-240.dhcp.insightbb.com) |
| 05:11.19 | *** join/#debianppc trublion (n=trublion@62.147.169.81) |
| 05:13.10 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying (n=freeflyi@ubuntu/member/freeflying) |
| 11:01.57 | *** join/#debianppc vi-config (n=jalandu@74-138-212-240.dhcp.insightbb.com) |
| 11:20.39 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying (n=freeflyi@ubuntu/member/freeflying) |
| 11:21.48 | *** join/#debianppc reDFog (n=redfog@151.74.154.138) |
| 11:28.01 | *** join/#debianppc trublion (n=trublion@lns-bzn-49f-62-147-169-81.adsl.proxad.net) |
| 14:39.46 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying_ (n=freeflyi@123.116.99.93) |
| 14:45.19 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying__ (n=freeflyi@123.116.99.93) |
| 15:06.07 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying_ (n=freeflyi@123.116.99.93) |
| 15:09.17 | *** join/#debianppc freeflying__ (n=freeflyi@123.116.99.93) |
| 15:28.11 | *** join/#debianppc reDFog (n=redfog@151.74.154.138) |
| 19:41.44 | *** join/#debianppc mrwick (n=cmr@net-128041.roam.fas.harvard.edu) |
| 19:43.57 | *** join/#debianppc MelkorD (n=morgoth@station-21-140-87-77.ticom.pl) |
| 20:27.24 | *** join/#debianppc philipp_ (n=philipp@p5484D794.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 21:21.57 | *** join/#debianppc MelkorD (n=morgoth@station-21-140-87-77.ticom.pl) |
| 22:56.50 | *** join/#debianppc Renegade (n=Cowboy@netblock-66-245-249-50.dslextreme.com) |
| 23:05.24 | Renegade | I understand the idea of pointer-based bloat - and heard the arguments about nobody except DB apps need 64... unlike amd64 where there is real gain by using 64bit in userspace |
| 23:06.51 | Renegade | however, I work on a product that interfaces with DB & transactional servers - and need to support 64bit on AIX and Debian ppc to prevent double-buffering or other hacks to cross the 32 vs 64bit boundaries |
| 23:11.11 | pahartik | Renegade: I suppose there is no 64-bit userland built for PowerPC on Debian because it requires extra work... |
| 23:14.18 | Renegade | what kind of extra work... I'd think it be a matter of setting compiler defaults based upon the extant kernel (like amd64) - I can likely set the machine up as a buildd; it is mostly idle |
| 23:15.48 | pahartik | Renegade: Maintenance work, just like what you describe |
| 23:20.17 | Renegade | ah, so there isn't really a religous battle for/against it ? |
| 23:22.05 | pahartik | Renegade: Not that I know of... |
| 23:27.38 | Renegade | cool, thanks ... I'll peek at what becoming a buildd entails (being a dd should help, some) |