IRC log for #devuan on 20200515

00:00.15*** join/#devuan mcr (~mcr@obiwan.sandelman.ca)
00:12.28*** join/#devuan hippiegunnut (~molly@troll.molanie.org)
00:19.19*** join/#devuan shibboleth (~shibbolet@gateway/tor-sasl/shibboleth)
00:30.45*** join/#devuan hippiegunnut (~molly@troll.molanie.org)
00:36.36*** join/#devuan Nukien (~Nukien@162.250.233.55)
00:45.51*** join/#devuan markizano (markizano@2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fec8:382d)
00:51.26*** join/#devuan cyteen (~cyteen@static-84-9-179-245.vodafonexdsl.co.uk)
01:08.15*** join/#devuan tarbz2 (~Thunderbi@unaffiliated/targz)
01:10.10*** join/#devuan arnoldoree (~arnoldore@2001:d08:1015:ab14:8a34:ce7b:d7d8:6408)
01:12.49*** join/#devuan arnoldoree (~arnoldore@2001:d08:1015:ab14:8a34:ce7b:d7d8:6408)
01:12.58*** join/#devuan arnold_oree (~arnoldore@2001:d08:1015:ab14:8a34:ce7b:d7d8:6408)
01:22.06*** join/#devuan ar3itrary (~hacker@v22016101923038440.bestsrv.de)
01:27.21*** join/#devuan sacioz (~sacioz@138.185.96.35)
01:29.40*** part/#devuan sacioz (~sacioz@138.185.96.35)
01:30.46*** join/#devuan xcm (~xcm@ipd114.250.tellas.gr)
01:48.30*** join/#devuan stiltr (~stiltr@c-73-12-245-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
01:54.47*** join/#devuan Nematocyst (~Nematocys@174-28-248-16.albq.qwest.net)
02:02.57*** join/#devuan D-HUND (~debdog@194.140.113.71)
02:32.55*** join/#devuan xcm (~xcm@ipd114.250.tellas.gr)
02:35.16*** join/#devuan tuxd3v (~tuxd3v@78-130-62-250.net.novis.pt)
02:35.28tuxd3vhello all
02:36.02tuxd3vI am trying to build a 4G router, and come across https://pcengines.ch
02:36.18tuxd3vdoes any one has experience with their boards?
02:36.38tuxd3vthey run a amd64 cpu
02:36.56tuxd3vQuad Core@1Ghz
02:37.32tuxd3vcoreboot bootloader, and maybe I could stick devuan on it :)
02:40.25DonkeyHoteireportedly they run linux a lot more efficiently than they run bsd, but equally supported
02:41.40tuxd3vmy idea was a 2.4/5Ghz WIFI + 4G LTE + 3 Gigabit ports for some routing , dmz, and firewall
02:42.36tuxd3vI don't know if the cpu is enough, because I don't have any experience with them, and no idea on memory consumtion of the system..
02:43.25tuxd3vthey sell board with 2GB and 4GB
02:48.48DonkeyHoteicpu is nice for what it is but the big downside IMO is the lack of L2 cache
02:48.54stiltrFor reference, I'm running Devuan on an espressobin and it's handling being a router just fine.
02:49.18DonkeyHoteiespressobin is arm, and the above board is x86_64
02:49.52stiltrWow I read amd64 as arm64... I need more sleep.
02:53.55slvrI'm gpu shopping. Any suggestions for a well supported one? I'm looking at a radeon rx560 right now.
02:56.19tuxd3vstiltr, expressobin is a nice board, but it doesn't have the 3 mini-pcie ports I need :(
02:57.32tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, does you think it will handle 2.4/5Ghz WIFI + 4G LTE trafic, and also some routing between 3xGigabit ethernet ports, with firewal running and such
02:58.03tuxd3vI mean handle it well, without trouble or capping the bandwith because its cpu is slower?
02:59.07tuxd3vI know what are the usual Ram sizes that a minimal linux has for arm64, but I don't know for amd64 :(
02:59.24DonkeyHoteituxd3v: how fast is your wan connection?
02:59.27tuxd3vdon't have a picture of the default base could boot usage
02:59.55tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, it will be at least 150Mbit Download/50Mbit upload
03:00.04tuxd3v4g LTE
03:00.18DonkeyHoteii have symmetric gigabit and seriously looked at that board, ended up going with something intel-based
03:02.08tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, so in your perpective, cpu will be bottlenecked..?
03:02.38tuxd3vits a 4 core, but I don't know if its more eficient than a 4 core ARM64
03:03.15DonkeyHoteiat symmetric gigabit it has little leeway from what i've heard
03:03.33DonkeyHoteiat 150Mb you're fine
03:03.54tuxd3vwhat is symmetric Gigabit?
03:04.01tuxd3v2 Gbit/s
03:04.07tuxd3v1 + 1
03:04.20DonkeyHotei1000 down, 1000 up
03:04.33tuxd3vwell 150Mbit is the maximum of my modem
03:04.49tuxd3vI will be at around some 10 Mbit/s or so :D
03:05.45*** join/#devuan bgstack15 (~bgirton@035-133-221-218.res.spectrum.com)
03:05.59bgstack15does anyone have any problems with update-rc.d never returning?
03:06.07bgstack15"update-rc.d sssd enable" just hangs
03:06.41bgstack15same for certmonger
03:07.27tuxd3vbut of-course will be 2.4Ghz/5Ghz dedicated cards, which theoretically could push for something like ~2000Mbit, 2300Mbit, but for that to hapen it needs to consume or send data to internal interfaces, like the NAS
03:12.19tuxd3vbgstack15, what you get with 'update-rc.d sssd defaults'
03:12.30tuxd3vit could be related with the sssd service..
03:12.48bgstack15tuxd3v: update-rc.d sssd defaults operates fine
03:12.57bgstack15does update-rc.d execute the init script?
03:13.19tuxd3v'service sssd restart' :)
03:14.16bgstack15I don't want to restart the service. The ipa-client-install command wants to set the daemon to the defaults. I'm translating the hard-coded systemctl command (systemctl enable sssd.service) to update-rc.d sssd enable
03:15.15tuxd3vit should be enabledonly in init 2?
03:15.19tuxd3vif so:
03:15.25tuxd3v'update-rc.d sssd enable 2'
03:15.37bgstack15I don't even really care about what the defaults are. The command is going to run unless I hardcode my wrapper to not execute it.
03:15.44tuxd3vthat way it will be enabled in runlevel 2
03:15.58bgstack15Has anyone heard of any update-rc.d commands that never return?
03:16.57tuxd3vdefaults is for runlevels 2,3,4,5, iirc
03:18.40tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, you suggest intel instead, but I don´t know of any manufacturer that does this boards with intel atoms
03:21.16*** join/#devuan bsd4me (~me@98-106-74-65.gci.net)
03:23.19tuxd3vbgstack15, you can check if simlinks are generated correctly or not with:
03:23.23tuxd3v'find /etc/rc?.d -type l -name ???sssd -exec ls -l {} \;'
03:24.00bgstack15Thank you, theit looks like it was disabled last, but I'm in the midst of reinstalling/uninstalling freeipa client.
03:24.12bgstack15The problem is the update-rc.d command never returns to the prompt.
03:25.27bgstack15oh my
03:25.31bgstack15i found the problem
03:25.46bgstack15update-rc.d invokes /bin/systemctl, which is my wrapper that invokes update-rc.d...
03:25.56bgstack15has had enough for one day
03:26.13bgstack15thanks tuxd3v for the help! Come to find out, I shot myself in the foot, repeatedly.
03:27.00tuxd3vbgstack15, I sometimes shot against me too :)
03:28.41tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, the other board producer is Bananapi with the r2, or r64, but they don't even have simcards in the board
03:28.55tuxd3vit they had, maybe I would buy r2
03:30.05masonbgstack15: You haven't even seen the footcannons I encounter in my day job.
03:30.39*** join/#devuan nyov_ (~nyov@unaffiliated/nyov)
03:32.45bgstack15mason: you're scaring me, man
03:46.44*** join/#devuan tuxd3v (~tuxd3v@78-130-62-250.net.novis.pt)
03:47.29tuxd3vDonkeyHotei, the GX-412TC@1Ghz has 2MB L2 cache total
04:00.47DonkeyHoteithat's not much
04:01.51tuxd3vI don't know of other option that permits me to have 3 mini-pcie card
04:02.01tuxd3v2.4Ghz + 5Ghz wIFI
04:02.10tuxd3vplus 4G LTE
04:02.20DonkeyHoteithat board has only 2 such slots btw
04:02.35DonkeyHoteithe 3rd is only msata
04:02.41tuxd3vhumm
04:02.56tuxd3v1 can be obly deditaced to 4G
04:03.07tuxd3v1 can be dedicated to WIFI
04:03.30tuxd3vthe other can be for msata or wifi
04:03.35tuxd3vI believe
04:03.43tuxd3vI am not 100% sure..
04:04.00DonkeyHoteithey have two different variants with different pin routing
04:04.10DonkeyHoteicheck the schematics
04:05.12tuxd3vthe one I am chasing is the apu3c?
04:05.32tuxd3vit has 3 gigabit ethernet ports, and 3 ini-pcie ports
04:05.40tuxd3vini -> mini
04:06.00DonkeyHoteicompare the apu3 schematics for the slots to the apu2
04:06.22tuxd3vbananapi has the r2, and the r64 but they don't even have simcards onboard :(
04:11.27tuxd3vapu2 cannot be used for this, has it obly has 2 m-pcie :)
04:11.35tuxd3vit needs to be apu3
04:45.30*** join/#devuan xcm (~xcm@ipd114.250.tellas.gr)
04:52.33*** join/#devuan DocScrutinizer05 (~saturn@openmoko/engineers/joerg)
05:49.04*** join/#devuan Acacia (~Acacia@unaffiliated/acacia)
06:12.52*** join/#devuan silentjet (~jet@staticline-31-182-193-145.toya.net.pl)
06:17.56*** join/#devuan sb35 (~sb35@23.111.78.47)
06:21.15*** join/#devuan pekman (~pekman@unaffiliated/pekman)
06:26.00*** join/#devuan Anonical_juju (~Anonical_@86.5.189.224)
06:28.07*** join/#devuan Joril (~joril@host-217-194-188-145.sbs.redder.net)
06:49.31*** join/#devuan Bombonica (8512c498@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.133.18.196.152)
06:50.36*** join/#devuan Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali)
06:50.37*** join/#devuan gnu_srs (~srs@2-248-159-26-no549.tbcn.telia.com)
07:24.28*** join/#devuan sunshavi (~user@190.236.255.69)
07:25.04*** join/#devuan telst4r (~telst4r@fsf/member/telst4r)
07:29.10*** join/#devuan phyre (~phyre___@78.30.25.235)
07:36.55*** join/#devuan pekman (~pekman@unaffiliated/pekman)
08:12.58*** join/#devuan proteus-guy (~proteus-l@2403:6200:8964:76d:81c9:388b:95e2:8a53)
08:32.46*** join/#devuan ShorTie (~Idiot@unaffiliated/shortie)
08:45.15*** join/#devuan xinomilo (~xinomilo@gateway/tor-sasl/xinomilo)
08:45.39*** join/#devuan xrogaan (~xrogaan@unaffiliated/xrogaan)
08:51.04*** join/#devuan systemdlete (~systemdle@c-76-105-3-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
09:00.50*** join/#devuan systemdlete (~systemdle@c-76-105-3-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
09:19.12openbsdt1i123it seems that slackware runs faster than devuan. is this behavior possible?
09:20.37*** join/#devuan cocoadaemon (~foo@2a01:e0a:4e1:97e0:179d:1cc6:8854:4d5c)
09:24.31golinuxHow is that a devuan support question?  It's not.  Just more useless trolling
09:50.52*** join/#devuan ruenoak (~chatzilla@222-153-58-9-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz)
10:09.42*** join/#devuan arnoldoree (~arnoldore@2001:d08:1015:ab14:8a34:ce7b:d7d8:6408)
10:31.44*** join/#devuan xinomilo (~xinomilo@gateway/tor-sasl/xinomilo)
10:38.15*** part/#devuan meep_____ (44f2e88408@xmpp.snopyta.org)
10:41.37*** join/#devuan bruc3l33 (b968ba32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.185.104.186.50)
10:44.23*** join/#devuan silentjet (~jet@staticline-31-182-193-145.toya.net.pl)
10:58.51*** join/#devuan sb35 (~sb35@67.231.16.206)
11:06.30*** join/#devuan ErRandir (~mhabets@81.168.73.77)
11:26.08*** join/#devuan bnjf (~bnjf@vm.bnjf.id.au)
12:03.10JorilAt the very least, a vague statement
12:11.23*** join/#devuan Acacia (~Acacia@unaffiliated/acacia)
12:19.49*** join/#devuan bruc3l33 (b968ba32@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.185.104.186.50)
12:31.29*** join/#devuan Centurion_Dan (~Thunderbi@devuan/developer/centuriondan)
12:39.09*** join/#devuan banisterfiend (~textual@ruby/staff/banisterfiend)
12:58.53*** join/#devuan ac_laptop (~ac_laptop@186.2.247.129)
13:18.01*** join/#devuan byzandula (~byzandula@beerbq.net)
13:20.54*** join/#devuan james1138 (~james1138@71-222-133-42.albq.qwest.net)
13:25.22*** join/#devuan Xenguy (~Xenguy@devuan/community/Xenguy)
13:29.26*** join/#devuan bsd4me (~me@98-106-74-65.gci.net)
13:34.08masonopenbsdt1i123: Slackware is WAY WAY faster. It's almost as fast as Gentoo. This is because Devuan doesn't funroll the loops.
13:34.49masonopenbsdt1i123: If you share the comparitive perf data you've collected we can give you more detail.
13:36.13masonopenbsdt1i123: Also, feel free to come join us at ##slackware, where you'll also find a lot of useful data on this comparative analysis you're doing.
13:38.40*** join/#devuan cd (~cd@unaffiliated/cd)
13:41.41masonopenbsdt1i123: (Because then you can ask "wow, how are you guys so fassszzzt?")
13:47.07MinceRlol @ funroll-loops
13:51.34buZzslackware just cheats by doing -O9999 on all binaries
13:57.17*** join/#devuan shibboleth (~shibbolet@gateway/tor-sasl/shibboleth)
13:57.36MinceR:>
14:11.22*** join/#devuan HumanG33k (~HumanG33k@62.147.242.8)
14:33.52*** join/#devuan g4570n (~g4570n@unaffiliated/g4570n)
15:00.50*** join/#devuan targz (~Thunderbi@unaffiliated/targz)
15:10.27*** join/#devuan Human_G33k (~HumanG33k@62.147.242.8)
15:34.10*** part/#devuan Joril (~joril@host-217-194-188-145.sbs.redder.net)
15:37.10*** join/#devuan gnu_srs (~srs@95.202.6.134)
15:40.41*** join/#devuan fanderal (~fanderal@50-1-125-64.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com)
15:44.03*** join/#devuan silentjet (~jet@staticline-31-182-193-145.toya.net.pl)
15:45.09*** part/#devuan fanderal (~fanderal@50-1-125-64.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com)
15:58.56*** join/#devuan IoFran (~Thunderbi@189.237.25.138)
16:15.33*** join/#devuan arnoldoree (~arnoldore@113.210.88.172)
16:31.01*** join/#devuan proteus-guy (~proteus-l@2403:6200:8964:76d:81c9:388b:95e2:8a53)
16:33.23golinuxAnd that still does not relate to Devuan support.
16:38.04nemoMinceR: I always loved the funroll-loops meme because it made me think of a rollercoaster
16:38.17nemomy home systems are devuan and gentoo and I love them both ☺
16:38.18MinceRsame
16:39.23nemoI used to run gentoo on my... P166 or P233, I forget exactly at this point. I think 166 with a whopping 96MiB of RAM, laptop.
16:39.34nemofinally gave up on that in like... 2010
16:42.46golinuxGood grief, can y'all please get back on topic.  Take it to #debianfork
16:55.34slvrWhere do we see the list of rules for this chat room, and how are the rules modified? Is a sole person in charge or is it open to community input? I have some thoughts on how offtopic conversations could be better handled.
17:01.51furrywolfyou mean "golinux yells at you until you stop" isn't ideal?  :)
17:01.57golinuxhttps://beta.devuan.org/os/community
17:02.08golinuxAlso in the topic for this channel.
17:02.39slvrI'm on irssi and my term is 80ch wide, the last thing I see up there is files.devuan.org.
17:02.47slvrthanks for the link, I'll write something up.
17:03.14*** join/#devuan Akuli (~akuli@mobile-access-b04865-204.dhcp.inet.fi)
17:03.25golinuxWhaaaat?
17:05.00golinuxFind something more productive to do and take it to the fork unless you have a support question.
17:06.24*** join/#devuan meep_____ (44f2e88408@xmpp.snopyta.org)
17:08.01furrywolf"how do we modify devuan policies" seems like valid support question.
17:08.36*** part/#devuan meep_____ (44f2e88408@xmpp.snopyta.org)
17:08.53golinuxOf all the things that need attention, that would be at the bottom of the list.
17:11.35*** join/#devuan Soo_Slow (Soo_Slow@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/sooslow/x-31376162)
17:11.39golinuxDevelopers who read this channel, shouldn't be taxed with slogging through unrelated stupidity to find legitimate issues that need attention.
17:13.02slvrHmm well I'll have something ready later. Discussing it here I agree is offtopic.
17:15.27golinuxKnock yourself out
17:17.45specingmeep meep
17:28.27*** join/#devuan gnu_srs (~srs@devuan/developer/srs)
17:35.13*** join/#devuan ejr (~ejr@178.165.129.93.wireless.dyn.drei.com)
17:39.43*** join/#devuan meep_____ (44f2e88408@xmpp.snopyta.org)
17:47.28*** join/#devuan Uberius (~Uberius@gateway/tor-sasl/uberius)
18:04.19*** join/#devuan Acacia (~Acacia@unaffiliated/acacia)
18:14.09ejrhi. i am trying to get my microphone to work in my browser(s). it works in installed programs otherwise, but when browser applications (palemoon and ,more importantly, chromium) try to access the mic, it does not. I cannot grant it permissions to be accessed either. i assume it is somehow related to my system settings, but dont really know where to look
18:14.16ejrmy mic is unmuted in alsamixer
18:15.40ejr(btw, running beowulf)
18:17.25masonejr: The browser has to let you select a device.
18:17.39masonejr: Which is to say, the web app it's running has to let you select something.
18:18.35ejrit does let me select a device, but when i try to set the permissions from "Block" to "Ask" or "Allow" it switched immediately back to "Block"
18:24.52bgstack15palemoon does not support WebRTC, which is the normal way (nowadays) to get to a microphone input.
18:25.21bgstack15have you ensured that other applications can get to the mic, and are not currently using it when trying the browser?
18:26.54ejrbgstack15: yes, i actually just need it for chromium really, for the reason you stated.
18:27.24ejrand i am pretty sure no other application is using the mic, though i am not sure how to check (other than disabling most programs running)
18:27.36ejrah wait, maybe it's telegram, i did not quit that yet
18:29.33ejrnah, still doesnt work without telegram running
18:29.34*** join/#devuan xcm (~xcm@ipd114.250.tellas.gr)
18:32.44*** join/#devuan climbingturtle (~climbingt@c83-248-135-84.bredband.comhem.se)
18:33.40bgstack15Can you try https://test.webrtc.org/ and see if it prompts you about the mic?
18:40.07ejrit actually complains right away that mic + cam access is not allowed (though cam works at the other site i was trying, jitsi meet)
18:40.47ejrah well, when i go on regardless, the cam works on that test site too...but not the mic
18:41.32ejr"NotAllowedError: Permission denied" is the error message for audi access
18:41.34ejr*audio
18:42.03*** join/#devuan stiltr (~stiltr@c-73-12-245-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
18:51.32bgstack15So in the same browser session though, jitsi meet will successfully use the microphone?
18:52.03ejrno, only the cam, not the mic
18:53.28slvris your user in the video group?
18:53.56slvrI think webcam permissions to /dev/video0 might be needed
18:54.12masonAudio should present as a separate device, no?
18:54.38slvrI suppose
18:55.02slvraudio works from other applications?
18:55.22ejri just tried, to make sure, "sudo adduser myusername video", but i was already in that group
18:56.13ejrthese are the permissions of /dev/video0: crw-rw----+ 1 root video 81, 0 May 15 20:29 /dev/video0
18:56.25ejrthough the mic i want to use is not that of the webcam, it's an attached headset
18:56.46ejrand yeah, audio works in zoom, telegram etc., but not in chromium
18:57.20slvrPosted my thoughts on moderation in this room for discussion on the forum. It's long, sorry. https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21759
18:57.34slvrIs chromium able to play audio?
19:01.05ejrslvr: yes
19:07.01slvrI used jitsi in firefox on devuan often, I wonder what makes chromium different.
19:07.55ejryeah, even more strange because it worked on my earlier installation (also beowulf); i just reinstalled it today
19:08.15ejrand i dont really know what is different now, in terms of packages or permissions
19:08.36masonslvr: Thanks for the post. Thoughtful.
19:08.45systemdletePuzzling.  Not sure what has changed, but I am having a problem suddenly.  I have been running ascii in a VM for months now, actually years.  I apply updates regularly.  It is up to date atm.  But now when I switch between the VM and the host, the VM does not "come back" -- meaning, all I get is a blank screen.  If I open console, I can see the user is sstill logged in and running the desktop.  ???
19:09.22systemdleteI tried searching this, but apparently I am not picking the right terms.  Any ideas?
19:09.22slvrejr: might be worth running chromium from a shell and looking at the output while it is failing
19:09.32slvrsystemdlete: is monitor blanking enabled?
19:09.42systemdletenot sure.  How to tell?
19:09.47slvrsystemdlete: I think you check with DISPLAY=:0 xset -q
19:10.00systemdletefrom console?
19:10.10slvrI just fixed this today on a beowulf system. Installing firmware-linux pacakge made blanking enabled. :./
19:10.23slvryeah ssh'd in or from a console. Doesn't matter.
19:11.36systemdleteNo protocol specified   xset:  unable to open display ":0"
19:11.44slvris X running?
19:11.50slvras your user?
19:12.14slvrif there's no session running, it won't have anything to connect to.
19:12.23systemdletexfce4-session running
19:12.45systemdletexfwm4 --display :0.0 is running
19:13.00systemdletexfdesktop is running
19:13.42systemdletelooks like 2 instances of Xorg are running, one for my user and the other waiting for additional login
19:13.52systemdlete(tty7 and tty8)
19:14.16systemdletehuh... what is -novtswitch option to Xorg -- is that the issue?
19:14.29ejrhttp://paste.debian.net/1146940/
19:14.43ejrthis is the log from starting chromium in the shell and doing the test.webrtc.org test
19:15.15systemdletefirmware-linux is not installed
19:15.56iv4nshm4k0v"No protocol specified" suggests an X authentication error.
19:15.59ejrtowards the end of the log some messages say that no audio channel exists and something about clearing from sink for ssrc 0, whatever that means
19:16.43systemdleteI just rebooted the VM, logged in, switched to the host, then back to VM.  That's all -- I haven't done anything else.
19:17.41systemdleteOne thing I remember now.  I temporarily clicked on the checkbox (on a previous boot earlier today) that says something to the effect that it should always ask for the session (I think upon login, but I'm not sure)
19:18.09systemdleteI checked it, unchecked it and left that dialog.  But it does query me upon login now.
19:18.26systemdleteThat's the only session-oriented issue I can think of atm.
19:18.42systemdleteit's xfce4 btw
19:21.06systemdletestrange, it just switched back to the login screen on its own
19:21.18systemdlete(I was in console)
19:22.27systemdleteslvr:  xorg is running (2 instances) but as root, not my user
19:34.30systemdleteare we still here?
19:36.38systemdleteone other change I made was increasing memory from 4G to 6G in the VM.
19:49.09ejri just tried the appr.tc site and there i also get a general "Permission denied" error
19:54.32*** join/#devuan conifer (~conifer@gateway/tor-sasl/conifer)
19:56.30systemdleteI'm trying xfce4 in a new session.  I want to see if maybe that one session config is messed up.
20:00.08slvrSorry, I was told I was an SJW and to begone by the fucking asshole running this place. I'm out. This project is fucked as long as golinux is here.
20:00.12slvrgoodbye.
20:00.17*** part/#devuan slvr (~silver@63.250.45.166)
20:01.59systemdleteslvr...
20:02.30masonYeah, there's a strong alt-right leaning which is unfortunate.
20:02.40systemdleteugh
20:03.20systemdleteadelie linux can't come soon enough it seems
20:03.54coniferhow did such subject even come up in a software project?...
20:04.14crashoverridesystemdlete: dunno, I switched to BSD
20:04.31crashoverrideadelie is taking years literally
20:04.31systemdleteand when?  slvr and I were just chatting, moments ago, and then suddenly *poof*
20:04.37systemdleteI know, I know.
20:05.15systemdleteand then there's openindiana
20:05.19systemdleteor was, anyway
20:06.07masonStill is. They just had a release IIRC.
20:06.14masonBut Devuan's quite worthwhile.
20:07.09systemdleteyour comment was unsettling, and it made me want to run and cry, not nec in that order
20:07.22systemdletebut this prob belongs in fork, not here
20:07.42masonToo toxic in there for me.
20:10.19*** join/#devuan sgage (~sgage@h64-35-192-144.cntcnh.dsl.dynamic.tds.net)
20:11.15sgageslvr, you are WAY out of line. Take your foul-mouthed passive-aggression somewhere else.
20:12.09sgageAs for SJW, it comes across that way. Fiddly little CoC's come next.
20:12.19sgageI'm off topic! Buh-bye...
20:19.47systemdletewell, now I can see what's happening -- after some period of time, a new login session just suddenly appears, and the one that was running goes blank screen, but all the programs are still running in that session!  and the user is still logged in
20:20.01systemdleteAnd this is with a fresh session.
20:20.06MinceRstrange how caring more about software working properly than making suits/politicians feel happy makes one altReich...
20:20.37*** join/#devuan ejr (~ejr@178.165.129.93.wireless.dyn.drei.com)
20:21.05systemdleteOr, one could be nice *and* helpful at the same time, right?  Maybe not bring up politics too much though.
20:21.26systemdleteCan anyone actually help me with this problem?
20:21.39systemdleteI mean, things were going quite well before now
20:21.53MinceRsorry, i have no idea what's going on there
20:21.53systemdletethis problem only started appearing the last day or so
20:22.06ejrdito
20:22.45*** join/#devuan sgage (~sgage@h64-35-192-144.cntcnh.dsl.dynamic.tds.net)
20:22.54systemdletewhat is "dito"?
20:23.24systemdleteis that like ditto?  or is it an acronym?
20:23.26ejrit means "i agree"
20:23.28buZzsystemdlete: lacking idem
20:23.37ejr(as I also have my problem with the microphone still, since my reinstall)
20:23.43ejryes
20:24.04systemdletebuZz:  Sorry, not familiar with idem either!
20:24.23buZzthats ok ;) its kinda bloated language anyway
20:24.33systemdleteejr:  I think you meant "ditto" not "dito"
20:24.33buZzidem dito is latin for 'same as before'
20:24.35ejrisn't all language bloat?
20:24.40buZzsystemdlete: no, dito ;)
20:24.48systemdlete???
20:25.06systemdleteanyway, per my issue, please...
20:25.39buZzare you multiseat logging into your 1 X server?
20:25.41masonsystemdlete: Can you summarize it? You're losing your screen swiching back and forth between a VM and your host system...? What software are you using, if this is accurate?
20:26.08systemdleteafter some period of time, a new login session just suddenly appears, and the one that was running goes blank screen, but the user is still logged in and all the programs are still running in that session!
20:26.14systemdletevirtualbox running ascii
20:26.32systemdletesomehow a new login is being spawned, not sure why
20:26.34masonsystemdlete: So, it's just inside the virtualbox that things go south?
20:26.42systemdleteso far, yes...
20:26.56masonsystemdlete: Nothing in dmesg about it?
20:27.09systemdleteah, those logs, yes...
20:27.17buZzhow are you seeing the login being spawned if you have a black screen?
20:27.53buZzis it a tty login? a X login? what?
20:29.06systemdletepaste.debian.net/1146953
20:29.24buZzso, nothing
20:29.36systemdleteNot sure where the ISO/CD messages come from.  I didn't insert a CD
20:29.44buZz> 22:27:17 < buZz> how are you seeing the login being spawned if you have a black screen?
20:29.59masonsystemdlete: X session? Can you show us the end of /var/log/Xorg.0.log?
20:30.32systemdletepaste.debian.net/11469654
20:30.33buZzi'm -guessing- he just dropped to console from X
20:30.37buZzalt+f7 to go back
20:30.38buZzright?
20:30.58systemdleteI did say that the one that was running goes blank screen, so yes
20:31.14buZzso how does a blank screen show you a login?
20:31.15masonsystemdlete: It could go blank from being X or from being a getty
20:31.15systemdletewho(1) shows who is logged in
20:31.29masonsystemdlete: Have you verified that the virtual console hasn't simply changed?
20:31.33systemdletemason: But why after so long?
20:31.46systemdleteno, virtual console is still tty7
20:31.54systemdletethe new login is on tty8
20:32.00systemdletebut no one is logged in on tty8
20:32.47buZzi bet you just need to go back to the virtual console running X , virtualbox made you leave it somehow
20:32.56masonso you see a getty show up on ttyv7 after there'd been a X session there? Or there's been a logged in getty session there?
20:33.03systemdleteno, on tty8
20:33.07systemdletetty7 is blank
20:33.12systemdlete(black screen)
20:33.17masonWas there an X session on ttyv7 before that?
20:33.30systemdleteyes, that is what I'm saying.  My user was logged in on tty7
20:33.38buZzon tty7, or in X?
20:34.05systemdletesuddenly, out of nowhere, the VM switches to tty8/login, and when I go back to tty7, it is blank
20:34.11systemdleteBUT
20:34.33masonsystemdlete: I really want to know what was on 7 before. It's not clear. X? console login? It matters for debugging.
20:34.34systemdletethere is still my user logged in on tty7, and all the programs for xfce etc are still running under that user
20:34.43masonAh, XFCE means X.
20:34.57masonSo there was X on it before that. Please show us the end of /var/log/Xorg.0.log from the VM then.
20:35.04systemdleteI just did
20:35.19masonOh, thought that was from dmesg.
20:35.28masonOh, that paste. It was a bad URL. "No such paste."
20:35.40systemdletehere it is again:  paste.debian.net/11469654
20:35.48buZzEntry not found
20:35.52masonSays "entry not found" here.
20:37.58systemdletepaste.debian.net/1146960
20:38.36masonThat one works. Looking.
20:38.41systemdletethanks
20:39.05systemdleteI'm starting to wonder if  maybe I need to reboot the host.  Perhaps some weird VM stuff coming from vbox
20:39.17masonsystemdlete: Not altogether sure as I don't tend to run X in VMs, but the vmware lines with what appear to be resolutions seem notable.
20:39.39systemdleteright.  That would be the VM changing "resolutions"
20:39.48masonsystemdlete: I'd line up that second one, at 6087.335, with the session going away.
20:40.03masonIs that the event at which it went away?
20:40.12systemdleteprobably
20:40.18systemdleteidk
20:40.26systemdleteI'm not expert on X
20:40.30masonsystemdlete: This is killing it with fire, but if I were you I'd use qemu-kvm for VMs.
20:40.46*** join/#devuan sunshavi (~user@190.236.255.69)
20:41.15systemdleteor maybe it's just another annoying problem with vbox that needs to be reported... yeah, I'm actually starting to look at xen
20:41.32systemdleteLet me try a reboot and see if that does anything good.
20:41.34masonThat's work too. KVM is less work to use since it's a type 2 hypervisor.
20:41.38masonThat'd*
20:41.50masonI used Xen for years. I prefer KVM now.
20:42.09systemdleteIf not, we can look further.  At this point we are guessing and maybe wasting your time.  I appreciate it though.
20:42.27systemdletehave you looked at xen dom0-less?
20:42.30masonNah, we documented the event that led to what you're seeing. That's productive.
20:42.42systemdleteit's available in the latest xen
20:42.51masonsystemdlete: That sounds conceptually impossible. Weird. I'll look.
20:42.51systemdleteI'm trying to install it here on a testbox
20:43.05masonhrm, https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/features/dom0less.html
20:43.16systemdletewell, at this point, you still have dom0, but it doesn't do the work of launching the domU's
20:43.38systemdleteyeah, there's a few youtube vids on it also.
20:44.05systemdleteI like the idea of not having a "host" OS (dom0)
20:44.18buZzi wonder if they finally fixed proxmox to install onto devuan yet
20:44.21masonHm, pushing functionality off to the bootloader. I guess that could reduce system load.
20:44.51systemdleteand they claim it is fast too because it is booting the domU's in parallel
20:45.03systemdletebut for the moment, let me reboot and see if this goes away
20:45.13systemdletebbs...
20:59.17*** join/#devuan Hoshpak_ (~Hoshpak@dslb-002-204-200-128.002.204.pools.vodafone-ip.de)
21:02.21*** join/#devuan systemdlete (~systemdle@c-76-105-3-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
21:05.44systemdleteI had also installed light-locker; forgot about that one.  I think I read that it can present some issues
21:05.51systemdletethat might be the sticky wicket
21:06.04systemdleteI might not have had it configured correctly, but it is gone now
21:10.40systemdletethat apt history log comes in handy... I had forgotten I installed it.  I'll let the VM run for a while and see if the behavior returns
21:15.40specingIs there a guide on how to write Devuan OpenRC init scripts ?
21:16.25specingI see "### BEGIN INIT INFO" at the top of them, loooks like machine readable part? Is there a tool one should use?
21:17.28specingactually... those don't look like OpenRC scripts, do they?
21:18.13*** join/#devuan phyre (~phyre___@78.30.25.235)
21:50.04gnarfacespecing: i think those are the sysvinit scripts you're looking at.  they still all run under the default openrc setup
21:50.31*** part/#devuan james1138 (~james1138@71-222-133-42.albq.qwest.net)
21:50.48gnarfacespecing: (i think the whole point of openrc is to not have init scripts, but then you lose compatibility with things that were using them, so someone came up with a way to use both)
21:51.42gnarfacespecing: there's a way to change it to be only openrc like gentoo does it, but i don't know specifics.  people in here have done it though.
21:52.54*** join/#devuan IoFran2 (~Thunderbi@189.237.25.138)
21:54.04specingIts fine if its mixed
21:54.33specingI just chose openrc as I'm familiar with it from Gentoo
21:55.41*** join/#devuan arnoldoree (~arnoldore@113.210.88.172)
22:00.40gnarfacespecing: alright, well i *think* the way it is set up, based on other people describing the difference from the gentoo setup, is that sysvinit runs first, executes all the startup scripts, hands off to openrc
22:01.10gnarface*then hands off to openrc, i meant
22:01.42gnarfaceso you get openrc's process management but sysvinit's initial startup
22:01.55gnarfaceat least that's the idea anyway.  i can't claim to have tried it
22:01.59*** join/#devuan g4570n (~g4570n@unaffiliated/g4570n)
22:02.06gnarfacesome people like it more, some people don't
22:05.26*** join/#devuan hightower2 (~hightower@213.149.51.48)
22:12.17*** join/#devuan Kruppt (~Kruppt@50.111.1.230)
22:22.21*** join/#devuan sacioz_ (~sacioz@138.185.96.35)
22:23.48*** part/#devuan sacioz_ (~sacioz@138.185.96.35)
22:25.13specingHmm, devuan's start-stop-daemon does not support --env?
22:27.26*** join/#devuan Bjornn (~Bjornn@2604:6000:1503:3ac:5dd5:a940:e6a:3897)
22:31.15masonspecing: What do you want --env to do?
22:40.11specingadd some stuff to the daemon's environment
22:42.08*** join/#devuan Xenguy (~Xenguy@devuan/community/Xenguy)
22:45.18systemdletedrat.  Still doing it.
22:45.51specingcommand_user also appears non-functional
22:45.53specinghmm
22:46.14systemdletewhat would cause a new login session to start on tty8?
22:47.24masonspecing: So, for adding to the environment, what I see recommended is populating the environment with a shell script and launching from that.
22:50.34openbsdt1i123After having devuan since first day, I start to move progressively to slackware. It seems good choice, reliable, fast and efficient system. back to old good days... devuan is a bit slow :(
22:51.50golinuxGoodbye then
22:52.25golinux\o
22:53.19openbsdt1i123thank you for all those years ! greatly.
22:55.32Xenguymason: I was logged on here intermittently, but are you saying that you find Slackware faster than Debian or Devuan?
22:57.12XenguyAnd what does "funroll the loops" mean?
22:57.25openbsdt1i123Slackware is for sure pretty fast.
22:58.08XenguyI heard good things about it, but I never tried it as it didn't seem to have dependency management.
22:58.42XenguyAnd Slackware has been around since forever too.
22:59.58*** join/#devuan hightower2 (~hightower@unaffiliated/hightower2)
23:00.26openbsdt1i123there is a saying about slackware... it is surely a good thing to try slackware. Since devuan must follow debian, devuan has to get in this Linux direction.
23:03.24systemdleteXenguy:  Maybe this?  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_unrolling
23:03.45Xenguythanks systemdlete , will check that out
23:04.28systemdleteit seems to be a compiler optimization thingy.  Flattens out the loops in code to sequential statements to save time in execution at the expense of more code size
23:06.01golinuxslack is OT for this channel
23:06.13XenguyOK, so it's some optimization technique...
23:06.27XenguyOK, will continue in #debianfork if you're there systemdlete
23:07.44golinux:)
23:11.00specingOh my
23:11.10specingWhy is Devuan's OpenRC from 2011?
23:11.26golinuxBecause Debian's is.
23:11.34specingthat's not cool
23:11.54specingAnd does Debian still pretend to support other inits?
23:13.12golinuxSupposedly.  Thanks to the init diversity team of Debian and Devuan devs
23:13.21*** join/#devuan fsmithred (~fsmithred@devuan/developer/fsmithred)
23:13.23XenguyFTW
23:42.13*** join/#devuan fleeky (~fleeky@2601:645:4300:6580:315c:801b:2f2e:457f)
23:49.25*** join/#devuan xcm (~xcm@ipd114.250.tellas.gr)
23:53.20masonXenguy: No, I was speculating about openbsdt1i123's assertion, but in all honesty I'd be shocked if there was measurable difference. There's AppArmour, but I don't see that mattering.
23:55.23*** join/#devuan tarbz2 (~Thunderbi@unaffiliated/targz)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.