| 00:11.36 | *** join/#edev linac (n=lin@122.90.105.196) |
| 00:11.46 | *** part/#edev pingbat (n=pingbat@188-220-33-191.zone11.bethere.co.uk) |
| 00:18.36 | *** join/#edev pingbat (n=pingbat@188-220-33-191.zone11.bethere.co.uk) |
| 00:18.43 | pingbat | found it! |
| 00:19.01 | *** join/#edev ZeZu_ (n=null@c-24-14-8-186.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 00:20.40 | pingbat | i tried to |= a write only register |
| 00:21.59 | pingbat | or would that work? |
| 00:22.30 | pingbat | WRITEONLY |= (1<<3) |
| 00:23.01 | pingbat | is this the same as WRITEONLY = (1<<3) |
| 00:23.43 | bsdfox | pingbat: |= is logical OR |
| 00:23.54 | bsdfox | so no, not the same |
| 00:24.08 | pingbat | but if it's write only will it return null |
| 00:24.33 | bsdfox | what chip/register |
| 00:24.47 | bsdfox | I'm not sure why one would be write only |
| 00:24.54 | pingbat | LPC24XX |
| 00:25.17 | pingbat | LCD_INTCLR |
| 00:25.45 | bsdfox | 1 min |
| 00:25.47 | pingbat | it's a status register |
| 00:26.25 | pingbat | scratch that, it's an interrupr clear register |
| 00:26.27 | bsdfox | I can't find LCD_INTCLR in LPC2478 |
| 00:26.33 | bsdfox | give me a better part number |
| 00:26.45 | pingbat | it's there |
| 00:27.30 | pingbat | LPC2478 is the chip i'm using |
| 00:27.38 | bsdfox | what page is it on |
| 00:27.47 | pingbat | 315 |
| 00:28.24 | pingbat | of the LPC24XX_user_manal |
| 00:28.27 | bsdfox | ack I got the prelim sheet |
| 00:28.30 | pingbat | *manual |
| 00:30.20 | bsdfox | alright so you read the status from LCD_INTSTAT |
| 00:31.03 | pingbat | yup |
| 00:31.36 | pingbat | i don't have the hardware now |
| 00:32.30 | pingbat | but could the |= have been preventing the interrupt from being reset? |
| 00:32.40 | pingbat | i am hoping yes |
| 00:32.54 | bsdfox | pingbat: yeah probably |
| 00:33.24 | pingbat | hum |
| 00:33.31 | pingbat | thanks |
| 00:35.32 | pingbat | has anyone in here tried the new luminary 9000 series? |
| 00:36.36 | pingbat | 9B00 |
| 00:43.12 | roxfan | not me |
| 00:43.48 | roxfan | only tried lm3s811 |
| 00:45.04 | pingbat | the 9B's are the first to have usb and ethernet |
| 00:45.11 | pingbat | i think |
| 00:46.07 | pingbat | what did you think of the lm3s811? |
| 00:47.16 | roxfan | didn't do much with it, but didn't have any issues either |
| 00:49.58 | pingbat | i was going to use one of the NXP ones but i couldn't seem to find a full manual |
| 00:50.06 | roxfan | hmm? |
| 00:50.14 | pingbat | it was odd |
| 00:50.17 | roxfan | which chip? |
| 00:51.13 | pingbat | http://www.nxp.com/#/pip/pip=[pip=LPC1768_66_65_64_2]|pp=[t=pip,i=LPC1768_66_65_64_2] |
| 00:51.29 | pingbat | i couldn't unzip the archive |
| 00:52.16 | roxfan | http://www.standardics.nxp.com/support/documents/microcontrollers/pdf/user.manual.lpc17xx.pdf |
| 00:52.52 | pingbat | failure on my part |
| 00:53.05 | pingbat | did you just google it? |
| 00:53.12 | roxfan | weird that it's not linked from that page |
| 00:53.45 | pingbat | that one's a draft too |
| 00:54.18 | roxfan | well, as far as i know this is most current one |
| 00:54.29 | pingbat | the Cortex-M3 stuff is all fairly new i guess |
| 00:55.32 | roxfan | maybe they just forgot to remove the watermark |
| 00:55.40 | roxfan | it's on 7th revision already |
| 00:55.53 | pingbat | it wasn't on the farnell site either |
| 00:56.10 | roxfan | maybe also check this http://www.standardics.nxp.com/support/documents/microcontrollers/?search=LPC17&type=errata |
| 00:57.34 | roxfan | the 17xx series seems to have some nice dma features |
| 00:57.46 | pingbat | haha, the errata sheet is on 1.2 but the manual is on 0.07 |
| 00:58.00 | roxfan | well, errata starts at 1.0 :) |
| 00:58.11 | pingbat | ? oh :-( |
| 00:58.30 | pingbat | but surely not until the the initial document is on 1.0 |
| 00:58.55 | roxfan | i guess different departments use different numbering... |
| 00:59.07 | roxfan | in a big corporation everything is possible |
| 01:00.09 | pingbat | that's a peeve |
| 01:00.21 | pingbat | wish i'd had that before |
| 01:00.54 | pingbat | they don't have a PHY do they? |
| 01:01.35 | pingbat | that the other reason i avoided it |
| 01:01.50 | roxfan | they seem to have usb phy |
| 01:01.56 | roxfan | but not etherner |
| 01:02.45 | pingbat | yup, and no ieee 588 |
| 01:03.33 | pingbat | well, I have a bunch of the luminary parts on the way now anyway |
| 01:03.36 | roxfan | well, that one can done in software i think |
| 01:04.21 | pingbat | really? didn't realise |
| 01:04.51 | pingbat | on a 50Mhz chip |
| 01:05.09 | pingbat | i thought it might be borderline |
| 01:05.33 | pingbat | i don't know much about it though |
| 01:07.24 | roxfan | yeah it's a protocol on top of ethernet... you send/receive some packets, measure time etc |
| 01:28.29 | pingbat | so the DAC on LPC24XX has a 'buffered output' no further details are given |
| 01:29.48 | pingbat | does that just allow you to write several output values into the buffer and go off somewhere else? |
| 01:30.48 | SpeedEvil | no |
| 01:31.02 | SpeedEvil | that means it has a low impedence typically |
| 01:31.24 | pingbat | ah |
| 01:33.01 | pingbat | thanks |
| 01:33.59 | pingbat | it's odd |
| 01:34.28 | pingbat | you can write values as fast as possible to the DAC but it doesn't miss any |
| 01:35.56 | pingbat | is it common that a write operation to the output register waits for the next DAC cycle to read in? |
| 01:36.54 | SpeedEvil | It depends. |
| 01:37.23 | SpeedEvil | It may have analog constraints on the output - for example - you may be able to update the input register at 70MHz - but it will only slew 1V/us |
| 01:39.01 | pingbat | the slew is quite good |
| 01:39.15 | pingbat | 1us settling time max |
| 01:41.40 | pingbat | it seems to slew quickly(0.1us) and settle for about 1us before moving to the next value |
| 01:41.47 | SpeedEvil | In general - look at everything. Read all the documentation on the DAC module. |
| 01:41.49 | pingbat | had to tell on the crappy scope |
| 01:42.04 | pingbat | the documentation is a bit thin |
| 01:42.06 | SpeedEvil | Look at the output ac and dc specifications |
| 01:42.20 | SpeedEvil | look for any block diagrams that'll hint at stuff |
| 01:49.45 | pingbat | i guess the DAC is limited only by the slew rate? |
| 01:50.46 | pingbat | so as fast as you can pump values in you can get an output |
| 01:50.52 | pingbat | unless it's clocked |
| 02:04.09 | SpeedEvil | sort-of - there can be other reasons why it's limited |
| 02:04.38 | SpeedEvil | There will always be some assymetry |
| 02:05.07 | SpeedEvil | for example - if the bits are not all added together at quite teh same time, you will get a lumpy response |
| 02:17.42 | *** join/#edev pingbat (n=pingbat@188-220-33-191.zone11.bethere.co.uk) |
| 02:21.45 | pingbat | thanks SpeedEvil |
| 02:37.54 | *** join/#edev HopsNBarley (n=hops@nslu2-linux/HopsNBarley) |
| 02:57.05 | *** join/#edev jacques (n=jacques@nslu2-linux/jacques) |
| 03:13.50 | *** join/#edev HopsNBarley (n=hops@nslu2-linux/HopsNBarley) |
| 03:36.48 | *** join/#edev HopsNBarley_ (n=hops@pool-173-67-93-147.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net) |
| 04:00.19 | *** join/#edev JoeLlama (n=snork@206.169.63.10) |
| 04:04.24 | Mirell | Hmm... |
| 04:30.27 | *** join/#edev HopsNBarley_ (n=hops@pool-173-67-93-147.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net) |
| 04:33.11 | *** join/#edev kergoth (n=kergoth@ip24-251-170-95.ph.ph.cox.net) |
| 05:08.27 | *** join/#edev monkey__ (n=monkey@tog-wakko4.prognet.com) |
| 05:23.19 | *** join/#edev mbuf (n=mbuf@118.102.130.6) |
| 05:42.27 | *** join/#edev HopsNBarley_ (n=hops@pool-173-67-93-147.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net) |
| 05:47.36 | *** join/#edev SandGorgon (n=OmNomNom@122.160.41.129) |
| 06:05.49 | *** join/#edev PureSine (n=chatzill@unaffiliated/puresine) |
| 06:24.26 | *** join/#edev PureSine (n=PureSine@unaffiliated/puresine) |
| 19:04.52 | *** join/#edev purl (i=ibot@rikers.org) |
| 19:04.52 | *** topic/#edev is Discussion of embedded systems (Hardware/Software/Linux/WinCE/Commercial Device Repurposing) : Firmware Linux (FWL) : Busybox and Buildroot : http://www.elinux.org |
| 19:08.42 | *** join/#edev T0mW (n=Tom@24.238.37.43.res-cmts.tv13.ptd.net) |
| 19:17.11 | Mirell | So debating about trying an experiment this weekend...not get on the laptop at all |
| 19:20.58 | csail | this is the line that it's making troubles: SysCtrlRegs.PLLCR.bit.DIV = val |
| 19:52.20 | *** join/#edev linac (n=lin@122.90.131.186) |
| 19:52.20 | *** join/#edev davidc__ (n=davidc__@user-387g3od.cable.mindspring.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 19:55.23 | *** join/#edev cmw (n=jlika@static-173-68-151-26.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:20.05 | *** join/#edev eox425 (n=root@213.133.177.11) |
| 20:24.23 | *** join/#edev CosmicPenguin (n=nobody@66-162-99-237.static.twtelecom.net) |
| 20:24.24 | *** join/#edev Madsy (n=madsy@fu/coder/madsy) |
| 20:24.24 | *** join/#edev HcE (n=egtvedt@egtvedt.no) |
| 20:30.52 | *** join/#edev flo_lap (n=fuchs@Maemo/community/contributor/florian) |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev T0mW (n=Tom@24.238.37.43.res-cmts.tv13.ptd.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev csail (n=rortega@200.89.69.139) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev linuxjacques (i=6217fec1@nslu2-linux/jacques) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev Redhatter (n=vk4msl@gentoo/developer/redhatter) |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev monkey_ (n=monkey@216-243-6-35.users.condointernet.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev mraddatz (n=me@markraddatz.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev Spida (n=timo@ns1.spinnennetz.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev bsdfox (n=h36sa@unaffiliated/bsdfox) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.51 | *** join/#edev juub (n=jwb@unaffiliated/juub) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev cjameshuff (n=cjameshu@pool-71-97-195-26.aubnin.dsl-w.verizon.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev ohsix (i=ohsix@66.220.111.99) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev MuscleNerd (i=eric@adsl-75-27-189-151.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev ccjoe (n=ccjoe@69.20.152.109) |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev m4t (i=matt@theorize.org) |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev rektide (i=rektide@voodoowarez.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev Zoiah (i=Zoiah@matryoshka.zoiah.net) |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev chouimat|lunch (n=mathieu@kde/developer/chouinard) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev mapd (i=mapd@mapd2.portfrog.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev solar (n=solar@smtp.gentoo.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev lilalinux (n=lilalinu@ist.deswahnsinns.de) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev vapier (i=UserBah@wh0rd.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev Crofton|work (n=balister@pool-71-171-31-89.nwrknj.east.verizon.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev mnemoc (n=amery@shell.opensde.net) |
| 20:57.52 | *** join/#edev armin76 (n=armin@gentoo/developer/armin76) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 20:58.44 | *** join/#edev mpk (n=mpk@209.20.91.138) |
| 21:35.12 | *** join/#edev linac (n=lin@122.90.131.186) |
| 21:35.12 | *** join/#edev davidc__ (n=davidc__@user-387g3od.cable.mindspring.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:35.21 | *** join/#edev ZeZu (n=null@24.14.8.186) |
| 21:37.03 | *** join/#edev CosmicPenguin (n=nobody@66-162-99-237.static.twtelecom.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:37.07 | *** join/#edev HcE (n=egtvedt@egtvedt.no) |
| 21:37.25 | *** join/#edev Madsy (n=madsy@ti0207a340-1311.bb.online.no) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:39.29 | *** join/#edev ZeZu (n=null@24.14.8.186) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:39.29 | *** join/#edev linac (n=lin@122.90.131.186) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:39.29 | *** join/#edev davidc__ (n=davidc__@user-387g3od.cable.mindspring.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:54.32 | *** join/#edev cvmw (n=jlika@static-173-68-151-26.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 21:55.46 | *** join/#edev HcE (n=egtvedt@egtvedt.no) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.46 | *** join/#edev T0mW (n=Tom@24.238.37.43.res-cmts.tv13.ptd.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.46 | *** join/#edev csail (n=rortega@200.89.69.139) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.46 | *** join/#edev linuxjacques (i=6217fec1@nslu2-linux/jacques) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.46 | *** join/#edev Redhatter (n=vk4msl@gentoo/developer/redhatter) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev monkey_ (n=monkey@216-243-6-35.users.condointernet.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev mraddatz (n=me@markraddatz.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev Spida (n=timo@ns1.spinnennetz.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev juub (n=jwb@unaffiliated/juub) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev armin76 (n=armin@gentoo/developer/armin76) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev mnemoc (n=amery@shell.opensde.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev Crofton|work (n=balister@pool-71-171-31-89.nwrknj.east.verizon.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev vapier (i=UserBah@wh0rd.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev lilalinux (n=lilalinu@ist.deswahnsinns.de) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev solar (n=solar@smtp.gentoo.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev mapd (i=mapd@mapd2.portfrog.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev chouimat|lunch (n=mathieu@kde/developer/chouinard) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev Zoiah (i=Zoiah@matryoshka.zoiah.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev rektide (i=rektide@voodoowarez.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev m4t (i=matt@theorize.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev ccjoe (n=ccjoe@69.20.152.109) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev MuscleNerd (i=eric@adsl-75-27-189-151.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev ohsix (i=ohsix@66.220.111.99) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:55.47 | *** join/#edev cjameshuff (n=cjameshu@pool-71-97-195-26.aubnin.dsl-w.verizon.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 21:57.58 | *** join/#edev mpk (n=mpk@aggr.com) |
| 22:00.16 | *** join/#edev Redhatter (n=vk4msl@2001:388:f000:0:0:0:0:71) |
| 22:02.02 | *** join/#edev eox425 (n=root@213.133.177.11) |
| 22:14.10 | *** join/#edev Christos_N (n=Christos@ppp-94-66-52-76.home.otenet.gr) |
| 22:18.17 | Mirell | Beer at work still seems weird |
| 22:32.38 | mnemoc | what happened to the classic coffee, jolt and pizza? :( |
| 22:33.53 | T0mW | perhaps they are trying to flush out the alcoholics? |
| 22:34.20 | T0mW | "Gee, Mirell gets trashed every day..." |
| 22:34.26 | T0mW | heh |
| 22:34.31 | mnemoc | :) |
| 22:34.37 | Mirell | Nah, they only restock the beer on Friday |
| 22:34.46 | Mirell | And it's all gone by...Friday. |
| 22:34.48 | T0mW | might be a pretty entertaining idea |
| 22:35.46 | T0mW | Mirell: they give the women good maternity benefits? |
| 22:35.58 | Mirell | T0mW: How the hell would I know |
| 22:36.55 | Mirell | T0mW: Sorry, I just...it doesn't even vaguely apply to me, so I wouldn't have noticed |
| 22:37.53 | T0mW | Mirell: np |
| 22:38.33 | T0mW | Mirell: just seems weird to have alcohol on company property, considering all the implications / complications it causes. |
| 22:39.25 | calculus | my last job had events where alcohol was served every Friday |
| 22:39.34 | T0mW | last company I worked for had done away with that at company function around 1988..1990 |
| 22:39.39 | *** join/#edev bsdfox (n=h36sa@c-67-161-174-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 22:40.35 | T0mW | I think that the christmas party was the only event they still did it at, but that was held at a local banquet hall. |
| 22:41.04 | T0mW | well, what do I know, I haven't had a "real" job in 15 years.. |
| 22:41.21 | T0mW | 14 |
| 22:45.19 | linuxjacques | T0mW: wow, long time no chat (jacques here) |
| 22:48.29 | *** join/#edev JoeLlama (n=snork@206.169.63.10) |
| 22:52.32 | T0mW | perl hashes are so much fun :( |
| 22:52.53 | T0mW | linuxjacques: hi jacques, still working on the West Coast? |
| 22:53.15 | linuxjacques | T0mW: nope, I've been back in Texas since early 2006 :-) |
| 22:53.16 | T0mW | linuxjacques: IIRC, you were in California? |
| 22:53.19 | T0mW | ah |
| 22:53.37 | linuxjacques | T0mW: yeah was in bay area, then went to OR for a while (loved it there) |
| 22:53.46 | T0mW | linuxjacques: like you say, it's been a while. Time goes fast while you're coding. |
| 22:54.07 | T0mW | linuxjacques: in my case, it goes even faster since I bought a home. |
| 22:54.10 | linuxjacques | T0mW: yep, I managed to transition into doing embedded linux professionally |
| 22:54.19 | T0mW | linuxjacques: cool! |
| 22:54.21 | kergoth | hey jacques |
| 22:54.32 | linuxjacques | howdy kergoth long time no chat with you too :-) |
| 22:54.35 | T0mW | linuxjacques: so they pay you to play now?! |
| 22:54.36 | kergoth | indeed |
| 22:54.47 | linuxjacques | T0mW: yep, tho they probably think I'm working |
| 22:54.52 | T0mW | LOL |
| 22:55.02 | T0mW | sssssh! |
| 22:55.25 | T0mW | I think kergoth is down south someplace... |
| 22:55.38 | kergoth | is melting in AZ nowadays |
| 22:55.41 | linuxjacques | they do block everything here tho (stupid firewall) I have been off irc until I found this webchat.freenode.net |
| 22:56.03 | T0mW | no openvpn using udp? |
| 22:56.06 | linuxjacques | I'm in Sugar Land, TX (SW of Houston) |
| 22:56.19 | linuxjacques | T0mW: haven't really tried that :-) |
| 22:56.29 | T0mW | should work, tough to block. |
| 22:56.40 | linuxjacques | it's 52F here right now and about to start drizzling |
| 22:56.57 | T0mW | ha, 24F and falling fast. Got to 13F last night |
| 22:57.15 | linuxjacques | ouch, that's a bit cold for my taste |
| 22:57.18 | kergoth | I'd have trouble doing my job if MV blocked irc.. working with upstream is critical :) |
| 22:57.30 | linuxjacques | kergoth: I keep trying to explain that |
| 22:57.41 | T0mW | linuxjacques: yesterday put a real test on the new radiant HW floor heat. |
| 22:57.50 | linuxjacques | my supervisor understands, but IT does not really care |
| 22:57.59 | T0mW | linuxjacques: I got to get back to hashing perl, later |
| 22:58.08 | linuxjacques | T0mW: later, have fun |
| 22:58.15 | T0mW | perl is fun. |
| 22:58.19 | T0mW | :) |
| 22:58.26 | kergoth | i love perl for oneliners, thats about it |
| 22:58.54 | linuxjacques | has done quite a bit of perl years ago, but needs to learn python. |
| 22:59.01 | linuxjacques | and lua |
| 22:59.07 | kergoth | python and lua are both awesome |
| 22:59.20 | kergoth | wrote some wow addons a while back, but has since stopped playing |
| 22:59.43 | linuxjacques | experienced evercrack and thus knew better than to start playing WoW. |
| 23:00.04 | kergoth | heh :) |
| 23:00.08 | linuxjacques | python and lua are the two top of my list |
| 23:00.12 | linuxjacques | to learn |
| 23:01.02 | kergoth | next on my list is .NET stuff, c#, f#, and boo specifically, and ruby at some point.. |
| 23:01.27 | linuxjacques | yeah ruby is maybe #3 on my list |
| 23:01.46 | linuxjacques | I dunno, vala is probably on there somewhere too. |
| 23:02.03 | kergoth | ruby and python are so similar in what they're good at, that its hard to make yourself learn the other once you know one, it seems. great for prototyping, less fugly than perl, more capable than shell :) |
| 23:02.08 | kergoth | vala looks cool |
| 23:02.48 | *** join/#edev MonMotha (n=monmotha@cpe-65-29-71-209.indy.res.rr.com) |
| 23:02.51 | linuxjacques | heh, I love perl but "less fugly than perl" is not saying much :-D |
| 23:04.01 | linuxjacques | from what I've seen python and ruby are *much* less fugly, tho ruby was a bit slow last I checked. |
| 23:04.28 | linuxjacques | ah yeah, I've had to do a lot more bash shell scripting that I really care to in the last couple of years. |
| 23:24.00 | *** join/#edev ZeZu (n=null@c-24-14-8-186.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |