| 00:04.05 | T0mW | sorphin: there is something missing: mipsel-linux-cc |
| 00:04.24 | T0mW | sorphin: I have a mipsel-linux-gcc, but not a mipsel-linux-cc |
| 00:04.54 | kergoth | ? |
| 00:05.08 | T0mW | is that a gcc-2.95 thingy? |
| 00:05.12 | CosmicPenguin | gcc is good, mkay? |
| 00:05.19 | T0mW | no |
| 00:05.28 | T0mW | it complains of no "-EL" option |
| 00:05.41 | T0mW | it is in arch/mips/Makefile |
| 00:06.18 | *** join/#elinux darkschneider (~gab@81-208-36-80.fastres.net) |
| 00:06.31 | T0mW | must be some MetroWerks thing |
| 00:06.34 | CosmicPenguin | if you have an mipsel compiler, isn't the -el implied? |
| 00:08.55 | T0mW | yeah, but why did Lineo explicity redefine CC from $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc to $(CROSS_COMPILE)cc in the arch/mips/Makefile ? |
| 00:09.17 | kergoth | who cares? |
| 00:09.37 | kergoth | 'cc' and 'gcc' are identical. there's generally a symlink from one to the other |
| 00:09.39 | T0mW | make does |
| 00:09.46 | kergoth | if theirs did otherwise, its their problem |
| 00:09.55 | kergoth | no, make cares about hte fact that your toolchain doesnt handle -EL |
| 00:10.21 | T0mW | ok, I'll take out the -EL option, no, I'll change it to -el |
| 00:11.24 | T0mW | I wonder, I am using gcc-3.3.3 cross, they might have used 2.95, there might have been a "-EL" option for little-endian then, and now in gcc-3.x it is "-el" |
| 00:11.53 | T0mW | screw it, I'll go build a mipsel-linux-gcc-2.95 |
| 00:12.50 | T0mW | oops, no such target in crosstool |
| 00:27.28 | mallum | kergoth, where can I grab a arm-gcc 2.95 from ? |