| 00:05.51 | rhowe | "(h) Public reference: By using the BitKeeper Software, You agree to the public use of your name and/or your companies' name as a user of the BitKeeper Software." |
| 00:07.30 | murb | rhowe: you can get a different license if you want. |
| 00:07.33 | murb | and have a bit of space cash. |
| 00:07.35 | murb | s/bit/lot/ |
| 00:07.46 | rhowe | pfft |
| 00:07.58 | rhowe | which is now |
| 00:08.30 | murb | rhowe: you realise they do snapshots? |
| 00:08.44 | rhowe | Hm, missed them |
| 00:08.51 | rhowe | Oh well, too late now :) |
| 00:09.14 | murb | rhowe: what hardware do you have to run it on? |
| 00:09.59 | rhowe | murb: Duron 1.1, Abit KT7-RAID and a 3com 3c59x. The NIC is supported, will see about the rest |
| 00:10.06 | rhowe | murb: Just wanna see if it works or not :) |
| 00:10.14 | rhowe | The HD is as good as blank |
| 00:10.18 | murb | how much ram? |
| 00:10.22 | rhowe | 768Mb |
| 00:10.33 | murb | what does -RAID mean? |
| 00:10.38 | murb | and do you use any such features? |
| 00:10.46 | rhowe | Means it has a Highpoint 370 controller, which goes unused |
| 00:11.02 | rhowe | I just use the IDE controller in the VIA motherboard chipset |
| 00:11.29 | rhowe | This is my desktop box, which boots via PXE straight from the NIC usually, so no harm can come to it unless xen trashes the BIOS, which is somewhat unlikely :) |
| 00:12.33 | rhowe | So long as xen plays nice with the Via chipset, things shouldn't be too bad |
| 00:15.04 | rhowe | Sound OK? |
| 00:17.32 | murb | rhowe: i think it really likes intel PIIX controllers |
| 00:17.39 | murb | atleast for decent speed. |
| 00:17.42 | murb | or SCSI. |
| 00:17.46 | murb | various chipsets |
| 00:18.14 | murb | rhowe: in the future they are planning on having driver domains which will run a cut down linux so native linux dirvers will work better. |
| 00:18.23 | rhowe | murb: Unfortunately, my PIIX is my dual celeron and would take effort to put xen on |
| 00:19.50 | murb | I would boot Xen on this machine, but sadly it(the compaq bios) asks for keyboard input on boot :( |
| 00:21.00 | rhowe | Is that a bad thing? |
| 00:25.29 | murb | rhowe: yes, the machine is in mechelen |
| 00:25.38 | murb | oh and i'm not sure the ethernet card is supported either. |
| 00:26.24 | rhowe | murb: I read that it was.. |
| 00:26.41 | murb | rhowe: on my machine. |
| 00:27.02 | rhowe | Oh right |
| 00:27.07 | murb | and the virtual network doesn't do v6 |
| 00:27.10 | murb | iirc. |
| 00:27.19 | rhowe | v6 of IP? |
| 00:27.26 | murb | yeah. |
| 00:27.33 | rhowe | Ah, don't use it yet |
| 00:27.48 | murb | they are going to do a bridge bus type thing they have the code but it hasn't not been merged yet |
| 00:28.56 | wethrin | Hmm. Since yesterday, I've only got 1 spam. |
| 00:29.12 | wethrin | Are spammers on break or something? |
| 00:30.05 | Leeds | not here |
| 00:30.29 | Leeds | unless you mean since yesterday as in the past 28 minutes or so - and even then, only 1 spam is pretty low |
| 00:30.45 | wethrin | No. Since Friday evening |
| 00:31.06 | wethrin | Well, maybe 4. But still something very low |
| 00:38.39 | Leeds | I do |
| 00:54.41 | murb | hmm isn't +91 india |
| 00:58.37 | wethrin | g'night all |
| 00:58.40 | Leeds | night |
| 00:59.06 | Leeds | murb: yes |
| 00:59.19 | Leeds | http://kropla.com/city_india.htm |
| 01:19.18 | murb | ta |
| 01:38.25 | *** join/#gllug murble (~murble@213.152.57.250) |
| 01:43.21 | rhowe | Hrm, is Fedora Core 2 test 1 the latest release? |
| 01:43.28 | rhowe | well, test release, I should say :) |
| 02:00.49 | *** part/#gllug formi (~formi@82-35-38-157.cable.ubr01.camd.blueyonder.co.uk) |
| 02:05.09 | rhowe | This is going to require alcohol |
| 02:06.16 | Leeds | heh |
| 02:06.41 | rhowe | kahlua, sorry |