| 00:05.48 | *** join/#gllug stephen (~stephen@windsor.org.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:12.20 | *** join/#gllug wethrin (~dankolb@ipv6.eco.li) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 00:38.57 | Leeds | morning folks! |
| 00:45.56 | highbury | morning Leeds |
| 00:47.58 | highbury | well nn folks |
| 00:49.19 | Leeds | night |
| 00:57.59 | AngelChild | morning |
| 01:16.04 | Leeds | worktime |
| 02:13.42 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~Richard@202.82.163.139) |
| 02:51.12 | *** join/#gllug JAV (~JAV@105.Red-80-34-40.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 04:16.49 | Leeds | okay, I've had enough of fighting with windows |
| 05:15.42 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~Richard@202.82.163.139) |
| 06:12.53 | *** join/#gllug Gonzo (~Gonzo@82-35-18-215.cable.ubr03.hari.blueyonder.co.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 06:15.04 | *** join/#gllug Gonzo (~Gonzo@82-35-18-215.cable.ubr03.hari.blueyonder.co.uk) |
| 07:29.07 | highbury | morning |
| 07:46.45 | morsing | morning |
| 07:47.21 | *** join/#gllug eye69_ (eye69@spoofed.host.name) |
| 07:50.45 | *** join/#gllug eye69_temp (eye69@spoofed.host.name) |
| 07:59.16 | Cope | greetings |
| 08:01.24 | mozrat | Morning |
| 08:06.47 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~richardc@202.82.163.139) |
| 08:13.48 | *** join/#gllug mikejw (~mikejw@81-178-90-91.dsl.pipex.com) |
| 08:16.42 | Leeds | morning folks |
| 08:16.56 | mozrat | hey Leeeds |
| 08:17.01 | mozrat | -e |
| 08:17.28 | Leeds | I'm feeling much better after forcibly un-crippling this machine :-) |
| 08:17.53 | mozrat | did you liberate it? |
| 08:18.22 | Leeds | I did |
| 08:18.32 | Leeds | well, I am doing... |
| 08:18.48 | mozrat | what are you putting onto it? |
| 08:18.52 | Leeds | it's amazing how welcoming twm feels after a few days of NT4 - and twm is a pile of shite |
| 08:19.21 | Leeds | it's also amazing how much quicker the machine feels - although I've not got it doing as much yet |
| 08:19.26 | Leeds | slackware, of course :-) |
| 08:29.15 | Cope | mmm tuna |
| 08:32.38 | Leeds | wow, suddenly everything is tabbed! |
| 08:33.22 | *** join/#gllug SlayerXP (~Mart@burningchrome.demon.co.uk) |
| 08:33.27 | Leeds | and strangely sticky |
| 08:34.00 | Leeds | back in a mo |
| 08:34.02 | Cope | sticky!? |
| 08:34.10 | Cope | hello SlayerXP |
| 08:34.43 | SlayerXP | lo cope |
| 08:35.56 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~richardc@202.82.163.139) |
| 08:36.32 | Cope | hello again |
| 08:36.41 | Leeds | hi |
| 08:36.54 | Leeds | better - now my x session is owned by afterstep rather than a random xterm :-) |
| 08:40.57 | Cope | u iz 0wned |
| 08:42.01 | Cope | Leeds: star wars was good :) |
| 08:42.13 | Leeds | glad you enjoyed it :-) |
| 08:42.27 | Cope | Especially the bits when yoda fights |
| 08:42.35 | Leeds | I'm potentially going to see it again on Sunday |
| 08:42.47 | Cope | groovy baby |
| 08:43.10 | Leeds | and should be meeting Sarah again tomorrow (again, briefly, I think) |
| 08:44.37 | Cope | aha |
| 08:44.42 | Cope | with what purpose this time/ |
| 08:45.07 | Leeds | to give her some things I should really have posted before I left the UK and ask her to either post them or give them to rhowe to post |
| 08:45.29 | Cope | When is she coming to uk |
| 08:46.08 | Leeds | next week, apparently |
| 08:53.23 | mozrat | http://www.42below.com/flashad/britain/index.html |
| 09:05.38 | Cope | that's rather good |
| 09:10.35 | mozrat | it is |
| 09:10.40 | mozrat | colonial t**ts |
| 09:18.08 | *** join/#gllug eye69_tmp (eye69@spoofed.host.name) |
| 09:18.21 | rhowe | Cope: Monday |
| 09:18.44 | rhowe | (want to get there in plenty of time for Eurovision :) |
| 09:20.20 | Leeds | rhowe: I assume there's nothing you need me to send you :-) |
| 09:20.54 | rhowe | Leeds: A happy, loving Sarah? :) |
| 09:21.03 | Cope | Leeds: yeah, love her up. |
| 09:21.09 | rhowe | haha |
| 09:21.13 | rhowe | Not like that :) |
| 09:21.21 | rhowe | Leeds: Hmm.. lemme think :) |
| 09:21.25 | rhowe | Leeds: Fancy a trip to HMV? :) |
| 09:21.36 | Cope | you have hmv in hk? |
| 09:21.46 | rhowe | Cope: Sure, there are loads in Asia |
| 09:22.01 | rhowe | Cope: Japan has them too |
| 09:22.04 | Leeds | not sure I can deliver a happy loving Sarah, although I could say nice things about you if that helps :-) |
| 09:22.15 | Leeds | I'm pretty sure I could get to HMV before meeting her though... |
| 09:22.19 | rhowe | Leeds: Sure :) |
| 09:22.41 | rhowe | Leeds: Well, if you can take a look in HMV and look for albums by 'Boa', that'd be cool :) |
| 09:22.49 | rhowe | Leeds: Lemme check which ones I dno't already have |
| 09:23.15 | Leeds | hmm... Boa ~= Noa :-) |
| 09:24.05 | rhowe | http://boa-nation.com/discography.php |
| 09:24.38 | rhowe | Either "My Name" or "Atlantis Princess" would be good - try and avoid any Japanese versions they may have |
| 09:26.34 | Leeds | got it |
| 09:26.42 | Cope | by jove! |
| 09:27.42 | Leeds | Cope: ? |
| 09:28.55 | Leeds | I suspect there may be an internal/external IP thing going on |
| 09:40.02 | Leeds | yup - it has a routable address and an intermal one - and sensibly, it's only listening on the internal one |
| 09:41.46 | Cope | Leeds: My fair lady |
| 09:42.09 | Leeds | ah! |
| 09:42.21 | Cope | ibot google for "by jove" +fair +lady |
| 09:43.26 | Cope | hmm not a very good google |
| 09:43.29 | Cope | never mind |
| 09:44.19 | mikejw | hey guys |
| 09:45.10 | Leeds | mikejw: good evening |
| 09:50.00 | Cope | an earth-shattering change of name |
| 09:50.28 | Leeds | heh |
| 09:55.27 | Leeds | nearly hometime :-) |
| 09:55.59 | eye69-tmp | Leeds: Try Evolution? |
| 09:56.22 | Leeds | eye69-tmp: got it working |
| 10:07.49 | rhowe | They're probably Kornet customers |
| 10:08.31 | Cope | is there any point in putting more than 4G of RAM in a linux server running on 32bit architecture? |
| 10:12.32 | rhowe | Cope: If you need more than 4G of RAM and upgrading to a 64bit architecture is unfeasible |
| 10:12.41 | rhowe | Cope: Other than that, I can't really see the point |
| 10:13.06 | rhowe | Cope: I think you need to do special tricks in Linux just to get above about 768M or something (you need CONFIG_HIGHMEM even for 1G of RAM, for example) |
| 10:13.23 | rhowe | Cope: I think there's something that happens once you go above 2G too |
| 10:13.44 | eye69-tmp | It's 4GB |
| 10:14.00 | eye69-tmp | It's the PAE addressing, I believe. |
| 10:14.02 | rhowe | Cope: Some parts of RAM have limited functionality once you get above a certain point, and I think it depends on things like CPU and chipset, too. (IIRC you often can only do DMA to certain regions or something like that) |
| 10:14.24 | Cope | eye69-tmp: Yes - that's what I recall |
| 10:14.39 | Cope | enabling 36 bit addressing - ie 64G ram |
| 10:14.40 | rhowe | eye69-tmp: *nod*, but I think in at least some cases you might even need to do PAE or something like it once you hit 2G. Maybe it's only when you have a crappy chipset or something though (or maybe I'm just misremembering - never had a box with that much RAM :) |
| 10:15.05 | Cope | rhowe: I have a recollection of the boundaries being <1G <4G <64G |
| 10:15.17 | eye69-tmp | Yeah, I'm not sure either. I have machines up to 2GB. |
| 10:15.22 | rhowe | Cope: I'd be tempted to just say that IA32/x86 being suboptimal for configurations >1G :) |
| 10:15.38 | rhowe | Cope: Or even s/ for.*// :) |
| 10:15.51 | rhowe | hm, too much coffee. Not making sense. |
| 10:16.01 | Cope | Basically I have a linux machine which currently has 4G of RAM, running big oracle DB and lots of other stuff; its constantly hammered - 100% RAM and 100% CPU |
| 10:16.32 | Cope | I'm considering adding more RAM - but not sure if it will be addressbale - maybe I'll need a kernel recompile to allow PAE? |
| 10:16.46 | eye69-tmp | Yes, you probably will. |
| 10:16.49 | Cope | sorry not CPU - SWAP |
| 10:16.56 | Cope | 100% swap constantly |
| 10:17.08 | eye69-tmp | Cope: Read the help section in the menuconfig. |
| 10:17.46 | eye69-tmp | Check your CPU flags in /proc/cpuinfo |
| 10:17.51 | eye69-tmp | It should show pae. |
| 10:18.21 | eye69-tmp | Otherwise the kernel wont even boot on the machine with PAE enabled. |
| 10:18.59 | Cope | yeah sure |
| 10:20.31 | Cope | yeah - pae is there ok |
| 10:20.38 | Cope | I thought it would be |
| 10:20.47 | Cope | Intel(R) Xeon(TM) MP CPU 2.70GHz |
| 10:21.01 | Cope | x 4 |
| 10:25.03 | Cope | hmm - looks like this is using a stock redhat kerel - can't find a .config file to check the # uname -sr |
| 10:25.06 | Cope | sorry |
| 10:25.09 | Cope | mispaste |
| 10:25.16 | Cope | the CONFIG_HIMEM stuff |
| 10:25.18 | Cope | # uname -sr |
| 10:25.19 | Cope | Linux 2.4.21-20.ELsm |
| 10:25.30 | Cope | p |
| 10:30.07 | rhowe | Cope: Check the bootup messages. Compaq box at work has this: |
| 10:30.08 | rhowe | 640MB HIGHMEM available. |
| 10:30.08 | rhowe | 896MB LOWMEM available. |
| 10:30.23 | rhowe | Cope: Very early on in the boot process (/var/log/dmesg on Debian) |
| 10:32.46 | rhowe | Cope: My dual celeron at home, which doesn't have a CONFIG_HIGHMEM kernel, has this: |
| 10:32.51 | rhowe | 767MB LOWMEM available. |
| 10:33.57 | rhowe | Cope: If you boot a non-HIGHMEM kernel on a box with more RAM than it can handle, you get a message something to the effect of "rebuild this with HIGHMEM if you actually want to use all the RAM" |
| 10:34.00 | Cope | 3007MB HIGHMEM available. |
| 10:34.18 | rhowe | Pretty conclusive, I would think :) |
| 10:34.31 | Cope | Memory: 3917204k/3997664k available (1705k kernel code, 75848k reserved, 1298k data, 228k init, 3080160k highmem) |
| 10:34.34 | Cope | allocated 32 pages and 32 bhs reserved for the highmem bounces |
| 10:35.01 | rhowe | Henrik Morsing calling wethrin |
| 10:35.06 | rhowe | wethrin: *poke* |
| 10:38.34 | Cope | hrm - in redhat land looks like the 'enterprise' kernel is needed |
| 10:43.55 | rhowe | sure, 'cause there aren't any desktops with 1G RAM+ :) |
| 10:46.46 | rhowe | heh, gnucash takes a good 5 minutes to load now |
| 10:46.53 | rhowe | The reports are *slow* to build |
| 11:03.19 | eye69 | Yay...back on my machine. |
| 11:08.40 | rhowe | wtf? |
| 11:09.22 | rhowe | Received: from mail.ore-ore.net (unknown [211.240.67.181]) by mailhost.wreckage.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C42152208 for <russell_howe@wreckage.org>; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:57:06 +0100 (BST) |
| 11:09.26 | rhowe | To: russell_howe@wreckage.org |
| 11:09.29 | rhowe | X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at wreckage.org |
| 11:09.31 | rhowe | t-yoshigaki@sis-world.jp |
| 11:09.34 | rhowe | spam_okurunayeah@mail.goo.ne.jp |
| 11:09.37 | rhowe | That's it. The body of the message is simply those two email addresses |
| 11:14.31 | rhowe | In the past two months, Nildram have invoiced me for 250 quod |
| 11:14.32 | rhowe | quid |
| 11:14.44 | rhowe | Took them until May to bill me for my access since December |
| 11:16.37 | rhowe | Then they did weird stuff |
| 11:16.45 | rhowe | I still need to total up what I've paid and see if it's right |
| 11:20.01 | eye69 | I should start to wrap up if I'm going to get to Stockholm at a reasonable time. |
| 11:26.38 | mozrat | Guys - I have a Debian box with libpam-ldap and libnss-ldap against AD... (AD has the SFU stuff installed). Trying to logon over SSH *nearly* works.. I get authenticated correctly... mkhomedir.so does it's bit but the SSH connection gets closed right after |
| 11:27.08 | mozrat | I'm suspecting it's not finding the users loginShell attribute but there's no mention of it in /etc/pam_ldap.conf |
| 11:42.19 | *** join/#gllug stephen__ (~stephen@windsor.org.uk) |
| 11:43.12 | Cope | mozrat: I can do some research, (which I am sure you're doing too) but I don't know... just wanted to assure you I'm not ignoring you! |
| 11:43.44 | mozrat | :) |
| 11:43.48 | mozrat | thanks Cope :) |
| 11:44.23 | mozrat | I've run SSH in debug mode but it doesn't complain before it kills the connection |
| 11:44.44 | mozrat | I would make sense that after successful authentication it would wonder which shell to run for the user |
| 11:46.45 | rhowe | mozrat: I'd wonder if the problem is somewhere in PAM |
| 11:47.00 | rhowe | mozrat: Nothing being logged to syslog? |
| 11:47.04 | mozrat | rhowe, I think possibly yes. |
| 11:47.27 | mozrat | nothing relevant in syslof |
| 11:47.30 | mozrat | g |
| 11:48.32 | rhowe | mozrat: PAM is something I'm trying my best to avoid :) |
| 11:48.36 | mozrat | :) |
| 11:48.42 | mozrat | how are you avoiding it? |
| 11:48.46 | rhowe | mozrat: No way to turn debugging on in the PAM authentication modules? |
| 11:49.02 | rhowe | mozrat: I'm leaving it to Debian and hoping it does a good enough job that I don't need to know anything about it :) |
| 11:50.40 | mozrat | ooh yes |
| 11:50.44 | mozrat | debugging in PAM |
| 11:53.40 | Cope | one geek two geeks three geeks and their coffee, went to debug a system. |
| 12:00.29 | rhowe | Looks like none of the available ones do what I want |
| 12:00.39 | Cope | :-) |
| 12:01.01 | mozrat | that pam debugging is just gibberish |
| 12:01.07 | rhowe | mozrat: heh |
| 12:01.11 | mozrat | nothing meaningful |
| 12:01.19 | rhowe | Cope: Want to do LDAP authentication, but not the way that mod_auth_ldap does it |
| 12:41.37 | rhowe | It lets you in with a username of '*' and a blank password :) |
| 12:43.52 | Cope | nice |
| 12:45.06 | rhowe | Yeah, I thought so too |
| 12:45.22 | rhowe | It also half authenticates you if you specify a blank username and password :P |
| 12:46.17 | rhowe | Default regex will be '^[^*].*$' I think |
| 12:46.59 | Cope | what if your users have a name like *rhowe |
| 12:47.13 | Cope | or would that never happen? |
| 12:47.25 | *** join/#gllug AngelChild (~angelic@AngelChild.user.allegro) |
| 12:47.39 | rhowe | Doesn't happen |
| 12:47.44 | Cope | groovy |
| 12:48.03 | rhowe | All usernames here match '^[a-z]+_?[a-z]*$' |
| 12:48.27 | Cope | ok |
| 12:48.51 | rhowe | Or, rather: '^[a-z]+([-_]?[a-z]+)?$' |
| 12:49.03 | Cope | then why not catch the exception? |
| 12:49.21 | AngelChild | 'sup |
| 12:49.37 | Cope | seems like a better way of ensuring it doesn't break with some strange username |
| 12:49.48 | rhowe | What exception? |
| 12:49.57 | Cope | well * would be an exception |
| 12:50.07 | Cope | or steve* |
| 12:50.13 | Cope | or steve-nelson |
| 12:50.28 | rhowe | You mean makes the regex as specific as possible? |
| 12:50.29 | Cope | whereas steve-nelson is ok for your first regex |
| 12:51.32 | rhowe | Currently, I'm fighting Java's regex engine: |
| 12:51.35 | rhowe | User name of "rhowe" does not match usernamePattern of "^rhowe$" |
| 12:53.03 | mozrat | OK - Microsoft have a stand right in the middle of the station to promote Office 2004 |
| 12:53.23 | mozrat | It's a 4 sided stand with a mockup disorganised office |
| 12:53.34 | mozrat | postit notes - box of papers on the floor |
| 12:53.37 | mozrat | PC on the desk |
| 12:53.48 | mozrat | on close inspection it's a very old P2 machine |
| 12:54.04 | mozrat | judging by the era (about 5 years old) probably 128Mb RAM |
| 12:54.28 | mozrat | I did mention to the girl on the stand that machine wouldn't run XP and Office very well |
| 12:54.32 | mozrat | she didn't understand |
| 12:55.03 | rhowe | mozrat: Bet it wasn't plugged in, for one :) |
| 12:55.13 | mozrat | that as well, yes |
| 13:22.35 | rhowe | mmm, microwaved cheese on toast :) |
| 13:27.23 | *** join/#gllug JAV (~JAV@105.Red-80-34-40.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 13:41.34 | *** join/#gllug AngelChild (~angelic@AngelChild.user.allegro) |
| 13:47.25 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~richardc@pcd646153.netvigator.com) |
| 14:02.04 | mozrat | anyone on SUSE 9.3 yet?? |
| 14:22.09 | mozrat | Cope, how did that happen? |
| 14:23.27 | Cope | mozrat: I imagine I put in two install floppies and followed the instructions |
| 14:23.40 | mozrat | Cope :) |
| 14:25.07 | Cope | today I shall mostly be writing documentation about subnetting |
| 14:28.18 | Leeds | oops, down to about 30p credit on my phone... |
| 14:28.31 | Leeds | evening folks |
| 14:28.52 | mozrat | hallo Leeds |
| 14:29.05 | Leeds | mozrat: hey... |
| 14:29.20 | Leeds | your friend isn't being responsive... I replied to your mail, not heard anything back... |
| 14:31.03 | Cope | hello Leeds |
| 14:31.15 | Leeds | hey Cope :-) |
| 14:34.58 | Cope | How's t6he liberated machibe? |
| 14:35.42 | Leeds | working pretty well, once I sorted my dns issue... of course, it's at work, and I've not seen it for hours :-) |
| 14:36.44 | Cope | on what are you connected now? |
| 14:37.05 | Leeds | my laptop |
| 14:37.15 | Cope | the fruity one? |
| 14:37.35 | Leeds | that's the one, although I apparently do have an IBM one in the pipeline for work |
| 14:38.02 | Cope | You haven't inflicted linux on the mac, have you? I can't remember. |
| 14:38.10 | Leeds | no, I haven't decided and certainly haven't announced wether or not I'm going to stay past a few weeks here... |
| 14:38.16 | Leeds | nope, running Panther here |
| 14:38.46 | Cope | azxscsCD |
| 14:39.15 | Leeds | um... |
| 14:40.01 | Leeds | a zx spectrum can't see CDs? |
| 14:42.32 | Cope | paddington green |
| 14:44.59 | Cope | 'The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System' |
| 14:45.06 | Cope | He likes the daemon |
| 14:45.20 | Cope | (which he thinks is a ``doggy'' |
| 14:45.33 | mozrat | *woof* |
| 14:45.46 | Cope | all animals are doggies |
| 14:45.57 | Leeds | you may want to correct that misconception before he gets into some strange religious things: god, dog or satan? |
| 14:46.02 | Cope | and all other things are yoyos |
| 14:47.53 | Leeds | that, on the other hand, sounds like a particularly deep philosophical comment |
| 14:51.54 | Leeds | mozrat: so should I bug Dan? |
| 14:52.02 | mozrat | Leeds, yes! |
| 14:52.13 | pdr | you should bug him anyway |
| 14:52.48 | Leeds | particularly people he doesn't actually know at all :-) |
| 14:53.13 | Cope | who is dan? |
| 14:53.41 | Leeds | Cope: friend of mozrat's in HK |
| 15:03.20 | mozrat | nah can't find one |
| 15:03.28 | mozrat | but give him a poke anyway Leeds |
| 15:03.44 | Leeds | willdo |
| 15:10.54 | mozrat | Leeds - by coincidence Dan just phoned! he said he'd been too "ummmm... busy? no, lazy to answer" but he was going to catch up this weekend |
| 15:11.14 | Leeds | cool |
| 15:11.22 | Cope | humid and warm |
| 15:11.51 | Leeds | Cope: nope, I'm in aircon :-) |
| 15:23.20 | pdr | Leeds: have you seen the bbc online trial? |
| 15:23.44 | Leeds | I saw something about it - was going to send them a mail, but I guess they'll be overwhelmed with responses |
| 15:26.15 | Cope | who is in the dock? |
| 15:26.37 | Cope | Dr Who? |
| 15:30.08 | Leeds | some sailors, probably |
| 16:00.28 | Leeds | bong bong bong, midnight and all's well |
| 16:24.29 | Cope | oooh -0 new suedey song - andersson/butler combo |
| 16:27.30 | Cope | the tears? |
| 16:42.51 | pdr | laterz |
| 16:58.16 | mozrat | bye folks - home time |
| 17:43.32 | Cope | woo! they played some suede on the radio for me :-) |
| 18:10.11 | *** join/#gllug edward (edward@4angle.com) |
| 18:10.22 | Leeds | morning edward |
| 18:10.25 | edward | hi |
| 18:10.43 | edward | about skype |
| 18:21.42 | gregj | bush has iPod, I think it's time to sell one, and buy something else |
| 18:21.52 | gregj | edward: skype ain't voip |
| 18:22.04 | gregj | skype is skype, they have their own protocols |
| 18:23.20 | edward | it is voice. and it is going over IP |
| 18:23.26 | edward | therefore it is VoIP |
| 18:23.31 | edward | do you mean it isn't SIP? |
| 18:23.37 | gregj | it isn't |
| 18:23.45 | gregj | they use kazaa protocol |
| 18:23.50 | gregj | that's the same company after all |
| 18:24.17 | edward | but you agree VoIP isn't a specific protocol? |
| 18:24.18 | Leeds | skype certainly is voip |
| 18:24.52 | gregj | for me voip is a set of well established protocols and standarts, so if someone doesn't use them... |
| 18:25.06 | gregj | btw, MSN IM is based on SIP |
| 18:25.12 | gregj | but ain't voip either :-) |
| 18:25.14 | edward | gregj: i wouldn't say it uses the kazaa protocol |
| 18:25.24 | gregj | althou, their voice thingie is compatbile with voip |
| 18:25.28 | gregj | edward: it does |
| 18:25.29 | edward | gregj: it uses a skype protocol |
| 18:25.39 | Leeds | voip is a type of service - as IM is a type of service |
| 18:25.41 | edward | what is the kazaa protocol? |
| 18:25.43 | gregj | whatever, if you thinkyou know better |
| 18:25.56 | Leeds | gregj: you know nothing |
| 18:26.10 | gregj | Leeds: that wasn't to you |
| 18:26.14 | gregj | Leeds: yeah, so do you |
| 18:26.23 | Leeds | very true :-) |
| 18:26.30 | gregj | :-) |
| 18:26.37 | gregj | at last we agree on something |
| 18:26.46 | Leeds | :-) |
| 18:27.41 | edward | on this VoIP TV programme a guy phoned BT and asked to cancel his phone line. they said no, because he had ADSL |
| 18:28.27 | Leeds | well he's a fool |
| 18:29.29 | edward | "first of all skype rhymes with hype" |
| 18:39.54 | Leeds | sleeptime |
| 18:39.55 | gregj | it's almost mid day |
| 18:39.56 | Leeds | gregj: 2:39 am |
| 18:40.04 | gregj | hmm |
| 18:40.10 | gregj | 11:39 am |
| 18:40.28 | Leeds | the family are all going to the synagogue in the morning for an event - I'm not going, so it's time to sleep in :-) |
| 18:40.58 | Leeds | g'night |
| 18:41.05 | gregj | night |
| 18:52.32 | Cope | anyone want to go to 'cargo' for the remix tonight? |
| 18:52.41 | Cope | I appear to have won 2 tickets :-) |
| 18:54.18 | edward | what and where is cargo? |
| 18:54.46 | Cope | its in shoreditch - indie music remix night |
| 18:54.56 | Cope | club / dance / booze |
| 19:01.57 | edward | sure, what time? |
| 19:13.11 | Cope | well - from now, really. I can't really go, as I have to stay with William, but if you can find a mate, you're sorted. |
| 19:16.02 | edward | thanks, but i think i'll pass |
| 19:16.55 | Cope | ok mate |
| 19:17.04 | Cope | anyone else, just give me a ping |
| 20:49.12 | Cope | test |
| 20:55.09 | *** join/#gllug Cope (~sanelson@82-69-220-158.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk) |
| 20:55.34 | *** join/#gllug mozrat (~mozrat@mozrat01.vm.bytemark.co.uk) |
| 20:55.35 | *** join/#gllug edward__ (edward@4angle.com) |
| 21:03.26 | *** join/#gllug mikejw (~mikejw@81-178-90-91.dsl.pipex.com) |
| 21:11.15 | *** join/#gllug rhowe (rhowe@xiao.siksai.co.uk) |
| 21:14.19 | Cope | rhowe! |
| 21:55.49 | *** join/#gllug JAV (~JAV@105.Red-80-34-40.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 22:08.31 | *** join/#gllug anap (~ana@213.78.90.69) |
| 22:59.50 | *** part/#gllug anap (~ana@213.78.90.69) |