IRC log for #gsoc on 20180807

00:20.19*** join/#gsoc infobot (ibot@208.53.50.136)
00:20.19*** topic/#gsoc is Google Summer of Code 2018 | Start of coding May 14th | https://g.co/gsoc
00:30.53*** join/#gsoc daMaestro (~jon@fedora/damaestro)
00:32.44*** join/#gsoc thomasbonte (sid4377@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-orxlkhkpmvnbqoyr)
01:09.01*** join/#gsoc nurupo (~nurupo.ga@unaffiliated/nurupo)
01:36.23*** join/#gsoc thiago (~thiago@kde/thiago)
02:07.37*** join/#gsoc RT|Chatzilla (~chatzilla@reactos/tester/RT)
02:45.22*** join/#gsoc RT|Chatzilla (~chatzilla@reactos/tester/RT)
02:56.01*** join/#gsoc ann (uid311059@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-uiyyxpkpnpyzevem)
03:06.10r0bbyrolls an eye to gevaerts
03:06.11r0bby:D
03:27.19r0bbyWait, people sleep?
04:53.21*** join/#gsoc darkxploit (~jay@197.227.163.175)
05:37.31*** mode/#gsoc [-r] by meflin
05:41.02*** join/#gsoc ggurbet (~ggurbet@unaffiliated/ggurbet)
05:51.15*** join/#gsoc himcesjf_ (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf)
05:54.32*** join/#gsoc digitalcircuit (~quassel@2605:6000:1518:a1a4:ec4:7aff:fe6b:c6b0)
05:56.14*** join/#gsoc rsh7 (uid189998@musicbrainz/user/little-rsh)
05:57.59*** join/#gsoc LordOfBikes (~armin@dslb-178-010-184-074.178.010.pools.vodafone-ip.de)
06:38.38*** join/#gsoc alicef (~none@www1392ue.sakura.ne.jp)
06:38.38*** join/#gsoc alicef (~none@gentoo/developer/alicef)
06:47.03*** join/#gsoc safwan (uid93576@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ltkulbucjcmmdsgx)
06:54.32*** join/#gsoc furiousDingo7 (~furiousDi@41.35.207.229)
06:54.32furiousDingo7Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
06:54.32furiousDingo7This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
06:54.49*** mode/#gsoc [+r] by meflin
07:36.42*** join/#gsoc DarthGandalf (~Vetinari@znc/developer/DarthGandalf)
07:50.18*** join/#gsoc thc202 (~thc202@unaffiliated/thc202)
08:31.32*** join/#gsoc sayalilunkad (slunkad@nat/novell/x-jyeipccahgjtlfns)
09:01.12*** join/#gsoc eirien (~sivanova@whq-10.cs.helsinki.fi)
09:20.34*** join/#gsoc ann_ (uid311059@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ufppgpxzosewvdcq)
10:20.24*** join/#gsoc teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee)
10:45.27*** join/#gsoc teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee)
12:05.13*** join/#gsoc Caterpillar2 (~caterpill@unaffiliated/caterpillar)
12:23.24*** join/#gsoc pombreda (~pombreda@216.234.144.41)
12:27.07*** join/#gsoc Justin_o (uid14648@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fivjzfyjgpkyedmy)
12:50.39*** join/#gsoc depate (~depate@dyn-054810efff6911a095001000.eduroam.ipv6.ruhr-uni-bochum.de)
12:50.40*** join/#gsoc jgeboski- (~jgeboski@unaffiliated/jgeboski)
12:50.40*** join/#gsoc Mek_ (~quassel@kde/mkruisselbrink)
12:53.23*** join/#gsoc jzaefferer (jzaefferer@gateway/shell/jquery.com/x-dtezzmhuupizkytp)
12:53.23*** join/#gsoc busterbcook (~busterbco@metasploit/busterbcook)
12:54.41*** join/#gsoc Nicofuma (~nicofuma@phpbb/developer/nicofuma)
12:58.30*** join/#gsoc ng420 (ng420@gateway/shell/elitebnc/x-bhqhnbygbfpbrdaw)
13:09.44*** join/#gsoc rsh7 (uid189998@musicbrainz/user/little-rsh)
13:31.22FresoFellow ops, should we set `/mode #gsoc -r+zq $~a` (and `/op Sigyn`)? This would allow spammers to still join and post, but only ops (ie., us) would see it, and Sigyn could still k-line them. Any legitimate users could also still post their questions and we'd be able to see it.
13:37.53*** join/#gsoc teepee- (bc5c2133@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.92.33.51)
13:46.41*** join/#gsoc cfoch (uid153227@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ufirxisyfngdbnbm)
13:51.44*** join/#gsoc kushal (~hopless@fedora/kushal)
13:52.17*** join/#gsoc pombreda (~pombreda@host-85-27-66-57.dynamic.voo.be)
14:03.07achillionoh cool
14:06.31jn__Freso: sounds pretty good to me (speaking as a non-op, notably)
14:15.40*** join/#gsoc vivekp (~vivek@unaffiliated/vivekp)
14:16.16*** join/#gsoc kappa1 (~kappa1@unaffiliated/kappa1)
14:28.18*** join/#gsoc thiago (~thiago@kde/thiago)
15:18.05Fresojn__: Well, me too obviously, but not doing anything without a 👍 from other mods here. :)
15:18.22FresoBut I feel `+r` is too restrictive for the target group.
15:29.01*** join/#gsoc bkuhn (~bkuhn@fsf/director/conservancy.president.bkuhn)
15:29.39*** mode/#gsoc [-r] by meflin
15:37.29*** join/#gsoc Cervator (~Thunderbi@2601:4c1:4001:1d5d:1013:f4e5:113b:c896)
15:46.52*** join/#gsoc teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee)
15:48.49*** join/#gsoc darkxploit (~jay@197.227.163.175)
15:53.32kappa1Anyone can point me to a good report from last years?
15:53.50*** join/#gsoc gruetzkopf (gruetzkopf@bnc.dont-follow.us)
15:53.51kappa1final report with the description of the word done, etc
16:07.02*** join/#gsoc m16 (~m@22.168.158.88.radiocom.ro)
16:07.02m16Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
16:07.02m16This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
16:07.02m16Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
16:07.34*** join/#gsoc nagyation (~nagyation@197.52.143.212)
16:10.39*** join/#gsoc thiago (~thiago@kde/thiago)
16:36.00*** join/#gsoc mujjingun (uid228218@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dcovjxxdvhuhjxmf)
16:56.53*** join/#gsoc cave (~various@h081217094244.dyn.cm.kabsi.at)
16:58.44*** join/#gsoc ariyan (2f0f4de8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.47.15.77.232)
16:59.14*** join/#gsoc enchi (~enchi@220.72.173.203)
16:59.18enchiChristel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
17:07.55*** join/#gsoc jkridner (~jkridner@pdpc/supporter/active/jkridner)
17:11.01*** join/#gsoc jkridner|pd (~jkridner@pdpc/supporter/active/jkridner)
17:22.04*** join/#gsoc prklm10 (2ff72193@gateway/web/freenode/ip.47.247.33.147)
17:23.40prklm10can anyone help me prepare for gsoc 2019 any help would be great
17:24.11jn__prklm10: first step: the student guide
17:24.14jn__!studentguide
17:24.24jn__oh, no, the bot is asleep
17:24.32blast007http://google.github.io/gsocguides/student/
17:24.52achillionjn__: well, I would say the first step is sticking around for the answer :P
17:25.05jn__oh
17:25.06jn__good point
17:25.07blast007oh, yeah, missed that :)
17:25.17jn__maybe that's the zeroth step, though
17:25.24achillionheh
17:43.50*** join/#gsoc Andre_H (~german_wi@dslb-088-067-201-164.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de)
17:47.18*** join/#gsoc darkxploit_ (~jay@41.136.255.25)
18:58.51*** join/#gsoc czart_ (~czart_@179.217.5.26)
18:58.54czart_Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:00.00*** join/#gsoc witness (uid10044@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qwtqxwoirnqizriy)
19:19.19*** join/#gsoc ximion (~ximion@2a02:8071:695:200:8aa1:9b7f:4418:e9e)
19:25.49*** join/#gsoc ish_ (75f7ae9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.117.247.174.157)
19:29.55*** join/#gsoc nandub (~nandub@201.131.244.143)
19:29.55nandubChristel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:29.55nandubThis blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
19:29.55nandubConsider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
19:29.55nandubOh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936
19:30.21meflin1 hour 27 min
19:42.08*** join/#gsoc rwg27 (~rwg@81-210-85-118.static.ip.netia.com.pl)
19:42.12rwg27Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:42.35meflin11 min
19:47.07*** join/#gsoc noonehere4u (~noonehere@124-9-163-116.dynamic.tfn.net.tw)
19:47.07noonehere4uChristel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:47.29achillionmeflin: spam intervals?
19:47.42meflin5 min
19:47.44meflinyes
19:48.12*** mode/#gsoc [+zq $~a] by meflin
19:48.24meflinachillion: can you still see me
19:48.28achillionyup
19:48.59*** mode/#gsoc [+o downey] by meflin
19:49.04*** mode/#gsoc [+o edunham] by meflin
19:49.16*** mode/#gsoc [+o gevaerts] by meflin
19:49.34*** mode/#gsoc [+o matthewwilkes] by meflin
19:49.49achillionand you get an op, and you get an op...
19:49.58*** mode/#gsoc [+o PulkoMandy] by meflin
19:50.13*** mode/#gsoc [+o terri] by meflin
19:50.28*** mode/#gsoc [+o warthog9] by meflin
19:51.16meflintake no offence these choices are based on long memorys
19:52.15achillionme? nah
19:52.55*** mode/#gsoc [+o Sigyn] by meflin
19:53.04achillionSo, "+zq $~a". This makes non-registered users' messages visible only to ops?
19:53.09meflinyes
19:53.11achillionneat
19:53.40meflinI might burn in hell ... but the other 2 options have been proven to ... be horiable
19:54.19achillionThis does seem like a great option for this channel (assuming you have at least one active operator at any given time)
19:54.31meflinthat is an issue yes
19:55.02achillionfor many channels, plain old +r works, but certainly not here
19:55.56meflinthat issue is also why I made some more ops ;)
19:56.04achillionyeah, I figured
19:58.07achillionmeflin: thanks, btw :)
19:58.12achillionfor the spam reduction efforts!
19:59.17meflin3rd fail is the charm ;P
20:02.00achillionwell, after that, we just shut it all down and go home
20:02.36meflinI'm to stubborn to go home ;)
20:03.24achillionwell then
20:03.27achillionin that case
20:03.29achillionsticks around for the show
20:03.42achillionlemme know if you need me
20:05.53achillionor if there's tea
20:06.04achillionI would also like to be notified of tea
20:06.07meflinthere is always tea
20:06.26meflinherbal, chai, black , green
20:06.46meflinpasses achillion some whild grown asamm
20:06.54achillionI mean, why else stick around?
20:07.16achilliongonna have to grab something herbal though; too late for black
20:07.39meflinrobidos with orange honey and hibiscous ?
20:07.55achillionsure
20:08.00meflinpours
20:08.27achillionty ^_^
20:08.51downey!tea
20:08.55downeyoh yeah, no bot :)
20:09.28meflinas that this is _your_ fault I server you a cup of teppid water :P
20:10.44achillionsips on his proper tea and glares at downey
20:11.09gevaertsAny guidelines on what we do? +v and tell them to ask again?
20:11.25meflingevaerts: I hadn't thought that far
20:11.32gevaertsOr try to help, which would make the channel look a bit one-sided
20:11.35downeygevaerts: i believe that's correct
20:11.46downeylet me test. stand by :)
20:12.10*** join/#gsoc newb1e (c0843d23@gateway/web/freenode/ip.192.132.61.35)
20:12.13meflin+v would worrk for humans
20:12.29meflinand bots may *censored 75 lines*
20:12.32*** mode/#gsoc [+v newb1e] by gevaerts
20:12.40newb1ehello world :)
20:12.45meflinnewb1e: you can stop being identifed to acutaly test
20:12.52newb1ei'm not identified
20:12.54meflinor it worked
20:13.04gevaertsYet we know who you are!
20:13.07meflinheh my bad I mixed up idents
20:13.10downeyachillion: did you see newb1e say "hello im a newbie how do i gsoc?"?
20:13.16meflindeath to newb1e
20:13.37gevaertsis happy that no actual newbie joined right then :)
20:13.39downeyor any other non-op ^^
20:13.52*** mode/#gsoc [-o downey] by meflin
20:13.58downeyhey now
20:13.59meflinsimple enough to test
20:14.01downey:-P
20:14.06newb1ebut i am voiced
20:14.24*** mode/#gsoc [-v newb1e] by meflin
20:14.29meflinsays who?
20:14.37meflinI see you do you see you
20:14.52*** kick/#gsoc [newb1e!~meflin@c-24-8-154-206.hsd1.co.comcast.net] by meflin (Do not disturb the Tea!)
20:15.01meflindam trolls ;)
20:15.01downeyok, seems to work
20:15.07*** mode/#gsoc [+o downey] by meflin
20:15.26meflinso +v is required for actual ppl
20:15.28downeyi'm not sure how we know someone is new and can't be seen by others, though.
20:15.38meflinbut ops have no way to tell
20:15.41downeydo we need to +v everyone, to tell the difference?
20:15.44ollythe unvoiced user doesn't seem to stand out to me
20:15.48downeyolly: right.
20:15.55achilliondowney: nope
20:16.06achilliondowney: first thing was "hello world"
20:16.07downeyachillion: cool, thanks for verifying :)
20:16.20meflinthis solution sucks
20:16.22ollyi think this approach is going to see a lot more students unreplied to
20:16.35ollyI can see it might work for other channels
20:16.46downeyit is not most desirable
20:16.56downeybut then again, nothing about the situation is desirable
20:17.01meflindowney: remember our founder :P
20:17.18ollymaybe if a bot auto-voiced people from the freenode web ui
20:17.23ollyat least until that's abused
20:17.26achillionI would have suggested adding info in the topic for users to ask for +v, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't help
20:18.08achillionHave a bot PM unregistered users who join with instructions?
20:18.09downeyall of the spammers are coming from unpatched zombie routers, from what i've heard
20:18.11*** mode/#gsoc [-zq $~a] by meflin
20:18.18*** mode/#gsoc [-o downey] by meflin
20:18.30*** mode/#gsoc [-o edunham] by meflin
20:18.42*** mode/#gsoc [-o matthewwilkes] by meflin
20:18.43achillionmeflin is taking over!
20:18.51achilliondo something!
20:18.52*** mode/#gsoc [-o PulkoMandy] by meflin
20:19.03*** mode/#gsoc [-o Sigyn] by meflin
20:19.11*** mode/#gsoc [-o terri] by meflin
20:19.19*** mode/#gsoc [-o warthog9] by meflin
20:19.22downeymutiny :)
20:19.30ollyum, i think some of those are usually ops
20:19.36gevaertsShould I act while I still can? :)
20:19.47meflinolly: I dont think so
20:19.58downeyChanServ should own all of that IMHO
20:19.59achilliongevaerts: the revolution is counting on you
20:20.22meflingevaerts: since I fogot you you should kickabn :P
20:20.33ollyi guess if you got it wrong they can moan
20:20.36gevaertsI should have kept quiet :)
20:20.46*** mode/#gsoc [-o gevaerts] by meflin
20:21.02meflingevaerts: you should be deeply offended ;)
20:21.12gevaertsI usually am
20:21.20meflindowney: chanserv is in command
20:21.43meflinthe only reason I consider handing ops out like candy :P
20:22.08downeyas long as valorie is +o life is good
20:22.10achillionMy Chromecast is acting up. Since this is a Google channel, pls help
20:22.19meflinso nothing works ....
20:22.34*** kick/#gsoc [achillion!~meflin@c-24-8-154-206.hsd1.co.comcast.net] by meflin (you asked :P)
20:22.45*** join/#gsoc achillion (~ach@unaffiliated/achillion)
20:22.47downeyachillion: did you try buying a new one?
20:22.51ollyachillion: have you tried turning it off and on again?
20:23.02achilliondowney: no. olly: of course
20:23.06downeymeflin: i have seen good results from a moderated +v channel with a bot that auto +v's after a little time
20:23.29achilliondowney: it's a very first gen... maybe I should get one of them ultras
20:23.42gevaertsThat might work, now we only need such a bot
20:23.48downeyright. a bot
20:24.02achillionbut then there's also the issue that a lot of users barely stick around a minute after they pop in and ask a question
20:24.23meflindo we care about ppl who dont even stay for 5 min?
20:24.57downeyachillion: FWIW i think it's something like 15 seconds ... long enough to deter the spammers
20:25.07achillionfair enough
20:25.29downey200 people in here ... surely someone wants to hack on gsocbot v2
20:25.33gevaertsThe bot should then probably also tell the user
20:25.45achillionmeflin: fair point, I just meant there's a lot of people coming in who do stick around but wouldn't realise they're unable to speak for half a minute
20:25.47downeyfame & unfortune awaits the brave volunteer
20:26.06ollyif Sigyn has +o it'll see what they say and if it hasn't kicked them after they say something, it's fairly safe to +v
20:26.21downeyolly: right
20:26.21gevaertsyes
20:26.31ollythough then you lose what they first say
20:26.48downeyolly: the bot could send a privmsg
20:26.50ollyand having the bot repeat it doesn't seem ideal
20:26.52gevaertsYou do, but that's inevitable
20:27.03ollywell, voice after N seconds may not
20:27.25meflinolly: that is a very very good point on the bot thing
20:27.51downey"GSOCbot here. Sorry, but we didn't catch anything you said before just now. If you asked a question or made a comment, please repeat it. Thanks."
20:28.05ollyi'm potentially up for some bot hacking, but I think it probably makes sense to see how the situation develops before putting a lot of effort into a solution
20:28.31*** join/#gsoc DJWillis (~djwillis@cpc123798-trow7-2-0-cust28.18-1.cable.virginm.net)
20:28.35meflinI agree
20:28.45meflinexpecialy since it would most likly be me :P
20:28.46ollyi'd assume freenode will be looking at a central way to address this
20:28.51downeyolly: they are
20:29.12ollyi'll be at the mentor summit - perhaps that's a suitable time to get together and review?
20:29.26downeyas long as nobody suggests slack as a replacement :)
20:29.30olly(though if someone's keen to work on something sooner, don't let me stop you)
20:29.32meflinolly: you will?  must find
20:29.42achilliondowney: ++
20:29.46ollybooked my flights and everything
20:30.07ollyjust need an ESTA, but that should be a formality
20:31.39meflinso we have tried all the things now they all suck
20:31.48meflinso what should we do
20:32.20gevaertsThe least sucky solution I think would be the bot one
20:32.36olly+r seems tolerable for this phase of gsoc
20:32.44gevaertsWell, it would be forcing the spammers to read bad poetry, but...
20:33.06ollyi don't see it as suitable in the application phase
20:33.13meflinbot is doable and we havent tried that suck yet
20:33.19achillionyou could +r with redirect into a -unregistered channel where a couple of ops hang out and eat the spam and explain...
20:33.29ollythat's not a bad idea
20:33.49meflinachillion: hmm define redirect
20:34.05ollythey can add ignore rules to filter out the spam too
20:34.14ollymeflin: it's an IRC channel mode
20:34.16meflinolly: by app phase hopefully this problem will be solved
20:34.23achillionmeflin: it's one of the chanmodes that redirects /join to a channel for unregistered users
20:34.41ollyunreg user tries to join #gsoc and end up in (say) #gsoc-unreg
20:34.48achillion+f
20:35.02meflinolly: and then unreg gets spamed
20:35.09achillionyes
20:35.10gevaertsHmmm, maybe
20:35.23meflinit would work for a while
20:35.28ollyyes, but basically just a few ops are there, and they can set ignore rules in their clients
20:35.46gevaertsTrue
20:35.47achillioncould also get sigyn in there
20:35.52ollyso the only traffic they'd see is unregistered users
20:36.07ollyachillion: maybe not - it'll only join channels with >= 100 users now it seems
20:36.27meflinvery likely if set up right the spam will never find it
20:36.28achillionah yeah, it's a stated rule
20:36.40ollyit's still not a good experience for newbies though
20:36.47gevaertsmeflin: depends on whether the spam bots get redirected
20:37.02meflinpoint
20:37.44ollywe probably should see what OSPO people think too
20:37.59downey#freenode-sigyn topic says min 30 users. but still
20:38.18achillionjoins #python-unregistered to see what it's like in there
20:38.53meflinholy bovine feecies
20:39.43ollydowney: interesting, i guess it was temporarily higher: "I just tried to invite it to a channel and got a reply: Invitation denied, there are only 77 users in #linux-libre (100 minimum for Sigyn)"
20:39.44meflinover 1K nicks
20:40.00meflinolly: sigyn is in hight demand
20:40.08downeycould be demand based ya
20:40.47ollythe danger is that the #gsoc-unregistered channel ends up becoming a place where new students just fail to get answers from other new students
20:41.01achillionmeflin: yeah, not sure why. It looks like some people just hang out there... maybe to help unregs?
20:45.40meflinwe have 3 bad solutions and new projects
20:48.11achillionIt's a true open source project!
20:48.46meflinso what should we do right now
20:50.55achillionkeep our client filters updated and eat the spam for a while longer?
20:51.09meflinthat is an option
20:51.36Robert_Snot really, most people dont' have client filters
20:51.55meflinRobert_S: living wit the spam so newbs can talk is an option tho
20:51.56achillionwell, it's yet another *bad* option perhaps
20:52.12Robert_SWe need better efficacy metrics.
20:52.31meflinRobert_S: we are dealing with current realities at this point
20:52.41achillionI'm just enumerating the options, tbh
20:53.20achillionmuting unregs + bot with instructions; forwarding to unreg chan; other botty solutions...
20:53.32meflinthat is a project
20:54.19meflinI'm asking for feedback on our 3 failed do it right now solutions
20:54.55meflinlet the spam happen, +r no un identifed clients , or only opts can see un identifed while that cant see who is who
20:56.27meflinthose options hope that freenode gets this under controll , the others are projects that take a bit of time/skill/and thinks
20:56.46*** join/#gsoc Yoda (~Yoda@58.65.159.251)
20:56.46YodaChristel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
20:57.40*** mode/#gsoc [+r] by olly
20:59.44ollyi think +r is least terrible right now - at least an unregistered user gets an error saying what the issue is
20:59.55ollyit could be clearer "#gsoc Cannot join channel (+r) - you need to be identified with services"
21:00.19meflinthe msg is not i our controll
21:00.21ollybut it's better than being quietly ignored but it appearing you can talk
21:00.24ollyyes, i know
21:00.42meflinwe could use the redirect option tho
21:00.57ollyand Robert_S could add a note to the page linking to the channel to say you need to be registered currently
21:01.01meflinI've hit that before and its ... not optimal in the least
21:01.41ollywe could, but it seems confusing to the new user and requires manual op intervention for each new user
21:01.47ollyor writing bots, etc
21:01.54meflinprojects
21:02.01ollywhich sure we can do, but for a solution right now it's manual
21:02.12meflinexactly
21:03.28meflinunless someone has a better idea of right now ... +r it is unless a chan op is monitoring
21:03.40*** mode/#gsoc [-r] by meflin
21:03.54ollyi'd hoped that each bot just did /list to find targets and +s would work to stop them finding the channel, but it seems there's more of a control structure in place
21:04.30meflinolly: that got more advanced 20 years ago +s does help alot tho i've tested it in other places
21:05.14achillionmeflin: did you accidentally -r instead of +r?
21:05.34meflinachillion: no I did not since I am monitoring r is off
21:05.49achillionah, right right
21:06.00achillionOh it was already on
21:06.05achillionnever mind!
21:06.07meflinif the spam is distruptive and I will set + when I go get lunch ( to late ) I will set +
21:06.21achillionroger roger
21:06.32ollyi'd turned it on to test the message an unregistered user got
21:06.32downey+?
21:06.44meflin+r
21:08.39*** mode/#gsoc [+r] by meflin
21:08.47meflinthis also isn't the only chan I monitor ;)
22:04.31*** join/#gsoc ann (uid311059@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-eqtfnnaqihdpzlxi)
22:37.37*** join/#gsoc jkridner (~jkridner@pdpc/supporter/active/jkridner)
22:40.47*** join/#gsoc RT|Chatzilla (~chatzilla@reactos/tester/RT)
22:51.43*** join/#gsoc thiago (~thiago@kde/thiago)
23:12.53*** join/#gsoc jkridner (~jkridner@pdpc/supporter/active/jkridner)
23:26.39*** join/#gsoc lachlan_s (uid265665@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-zcatznfojhznjksq)
23:52.21*** join/#gsoc appleclusters (uid197723@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kkgvzzomrfgvyoor)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.